Sociology of the Time

“Social Integration and Figuration in the Elias Theory”

Javier Alfonso Saady Avila Barahona
Peoples Friendship University of Russia
December 2017.
 PREFACE

The present study will take some ideas from Elias Sociology but, I founded my property point of
view about of the concept <<time>> or <<timing>> in his theory. The central and chaotic idea is
understanding the influence and direction as, the time organize the social life and the modernity,
however the sociologist refers all the content or theories to starting the physically or philosophy
the matters on the time. Now the purpose is to give clarity on the thought; when us spoke around
the time, these study is not historical recording or resume that final idea is recovery the position in
the actual fact on sociology of the time.

The topic is so, difficultly because pretend change our concept in think the society, how will do
you do it? Just to be <<relationship and function>> is a simple paradigm, if you observed what,
each people have the unique relations and life. These relations conclude Elias is the form in as,
crate the specifically function on the networks social <<society>> in according with the vision the
sciences have more unite point for demonstrate the social process.

On the civilizations created consequences to starting of the control in our behavior, all this process
called “civilisation” leads us, at the big analyses in the development and social progress. Two
importance’s words for understood our ideas this is a central contribution from sociogenic
resources the sociology will understand to the individual life is a social progress. Perhaps the
society is a dynamic idea <<on the movement>> all the content centralized in the individuum is a
reflection for each society can be change or maintained the natural order into the property
development.
 VI

But for now, our concern is demonstrating these relation, not such the phenomenology construction
as Berguer and Luhmann did it [common sense] recreate the real fact in social community, just is
once separation between individuum and society. This social constructor tries, again in separated
the human <<individuum>> at the set, is as will lives together in this world but and the same time
create more and more social controllers for the activity, I will to use the Elias approaches
orientation on the space, well the humanity to gone on the time.

Well understand the orientation is a complex, I found some perception into the social integration,
which are: auto-coaction, auto-coercion, etc. Notice the word auto seems to be than and the more
individualization the humanity, believed to shup up on the property sphere. The languages play
and importance role into the life and these characteristics to pass in generation in generation these
an exactly point for recovery the littles experience in join to interpretation with timers, watch or
any machine what were created for control the social life. Only you can see any places, street,
station bus, metro and supermarket “the people are ubicate on the space with time” or could be
these ubication or orientation is the new control in the social life.

The social order is necessary for the progress and civilization but, depends too much of each
society that’s differently spaces and integration into the social organization but, what happened if
the humanity it is directed with the same time, the universal force is not central matters; I think the
central dialogue is how the sociologist understand the society? Is the time creating, specific
structure in join to the same spaces, almost and the equal <<mode>> or stereotypes on the
globalization, the first task is so difficultly, consisted in create new mental schemes for the
sociologist.
 VII

I propose these papers, a as principal ways to will find the real consequences into the time for the
complementary social figuration [theory as an explanation of the social process] by now this
process you can call, civilization, language, symbolic or individual life. My contribution is
understanding the time as a, concept and real personification into the sociology not to as, mediation
or measure, the life is not time is consequences of the education or socialization in our
mentalization of the which we have, controllers, personification or until ghost.

The theory of the time in sociology renovate the social resources in to see to the future, present or
past, as an experience we are heirs and victims of our time. These heirs represented the effort and
dedication of my knowledge with help of the Norberto Elias in gratitude for open my sociology
imagination in will see into the consciences “the humanity is not out the nature” is there into the
nature evolution and together with human’s society.

Javier Alfonso A.B

December 2017.
 Introduction

When I thinking about of sociology some matters come into to me perhaps is the perception on the
sense or is manipulation the social context, ever the people doing questions not just about the
existence, life or God. In the actually the quality of life re-creates some totalities in the mentality,
to call “daily life” in social sphere, we can find control or disillusion in join with the life, but these
not sociology troubles. Now the sociologist need more forms for think the global world and them
not separated the sciences with “passion point of view” we need more distance between the society
and the ideology.

However, the sociology it`s in crisis or we cannot see this, in all dialogues what around of the
concepts as: time, evolution, psychology or anthropology leads us to confrontation for understand
the simple’s consequences in the social life or in society. These problems are about the method
and methology in considered final solutions at fetishized the language in join to analysis systematic
for demonstrate theories, is a real example think what, the time only just matters in natural science.

In the Elias book “Was it Soziologie” he considered: the substantives, what have been used into
the Social Sciences and in the daily life too…. It is constitution as physics objects and visible them
the people can take...” the author did refer the humanity doing or create things for measure and
can be to controller, for that’s another human and the same situation the nature.

Ever these events or periods on the history were referred a level inside social development; another
author to try explanations in the individual constitution, whatever the famous hypothesis in will
see the society and individuum as an event for separated, but in this introduction, will demonstrate
the principal ideas from Social integration and Social Process as an explanation of the real facts at
the society, the same times with compromising and them will take distance.

Try or have been spoken into the social sciences about the <<timing>> is converted also
compromising almost to thought <<what is the society?>> many people believed or tries to know
around this word [societal, society] as a conjunct or peoples conglomerate, but this so different in
any parts on the world. I referring about what, the humanity believes to know almost in any topics;
take concepts of syntactic high level or abstraction; persuade a believer in anything, for example
in the primitive culture the organization were, around of the planets or nature for will be survive
as group. In this level or epoch, the humanity found the answers in the observations what, were
out of their eyes, actually some peoples can call what twenty-four hours is a day; but in past before
than us, maybe the humanity called God.

The language is experience and heirs of other generations such, these developments consistent in
create symbolic system for complementary to next the generation. Each process is in movement
and dynamic level, in constables changed never stop, there is a civilisation or civilization these
movements have influence at the individual life and behavior, why? In west civilization at the XVI
at XVIII century, well in this period referred in, how the people maybe to eat? (Rotterdom, 1463)
The modals in the table, on the bed, sexual activities, etc. For whom is the perfectly examples as
regulate the individual impulses front the social context such, here can see as the human is
decentralized your society from natural phenome’s. Our consciences are structure for the society
in were born, this particular element in time resources, the keys for understand is as, this behavior
converted some styles life’s in true or common.

If the behavior is relation with another people as community these leads us to integration, with
this reformulate our vision into the social events or facts; the relational form is to give a completely
observation, as human and society together. The first element is the integration have specifically
relations in each level join to social life, respond to all the human need the humanity for survive
as a group. The second element is knowledge as heirs for the next generation to call development,
all the humanity takes ideas in the past and tries change on the way to the future, however the
human people have some natural characteristics for understand the environment and absorber
information and assimilate concepts as symbolic influence in their orientation.

The third element is the institutionalized as a patron in followed the life on the next time [past,
present or future] on the beginning, look the work of the State in regularized the individual life
<<laws, work, education, health care>> but now is not just State or Government; these regularized
can be, elaborate in schemes for the humanity what felt with normally and distractions in brake
the rules or social norms. Perhaps the time has some answers about it`s, each human group has
reference marks for maintained the orientation on the space.

Exist a one demonstration of the humanity just ca be survived in group, from the primitive at the
modern society all the movements join to social development in each level of our history, but these
commons are the responsible; because the human lives together. Ever the groups, exit on the
movement or dynamics systems in constantly change, in these the organizations are concentrate in
try the efficiently effort for reach the major dynamics into the society, but even this constantly
actions try renovation on the social organizations in modifies the behavior their components or
individual’s parts.

The time is according into the social change because the human time can look the society as,
separated from nature environment. A long distance between the society and nature were create
for the traditional conceptions into the sciences in special Kant Philosophy, he created the
possibility world inside to the experience, in this posture pose the followed conception: outside on
the human, just exist object ... in our reason can be see objects and this exist for the knowledge
into the reason... (Kant, 1787). This manner changed the conceptions about the humanity in society
at recognized the reason as apriori what knowledge from to the autonomy after of the volunteer,
referred the discontinuous at human organizations, where is from the social development? The
answers are reformulated after some century for Augusto Comte in his Course of positivism
philosophy this work explained the perfectly plan of the sciences into the social life, already the
three level in human knowledge: theologically, Metaphysis and positivism. In appearance, the first
task in the classic sociology, have been understood the natural order and them social order, but our
position is converting the different position as an explanation model into the time theory in
sociology.

The social entanglement tries in conciliar, what the society have some areas with relative’s
autonomy in this way, pretended see the observation of time as a: social relations both is physics,
social, subjective and objective. The property “relative autonomy” is considered all the individual
people have unique existence in this entanglement, by now the time let to see the humanity auto
controller their action into the minimum social relations … “A social coercion is a type of action
exercised by men among themselves and on themselves” (Elias, 1970). Seems to be into
development on the civilization, is necessary change not just economic model or social structure
that’s modifies the awareness for preserved the idealism in join to the order.

Almost you can have considered the idea of time as a phenomenon is out just perceptible in
measure at the clocks or calculator, if you see the street some minutes and observer all humans
gone at the different direction but with limit; these peoples have only paper into the social
envelopment, the limits impose for the social entanglement, the social predetermination.
Socialization of the social values as: respect, honestly, love, solidarity is teaching as a real
perception on the primary function, when the people decide participate on the social life, of this
manner the conceptions as, the time, development, progress, order etc.
 Time figuration

Uber Dei Zeit

The timing <<time>> or the passage of generations leave us, to think big spaces in sociology with
the formations that we have inherited: types of socialization, behavior or language forms; all we
can observe "as a society" that figure of lattices that between networks of meaning that are moving
this condition is not a simple static idea. Continuous development towards the distant future
between past and present amending cognitively in their commitment1with humanity as stipulated
time now, in a relational set. As noted by Norbert Elias: "think over time, attracts some problems
in the way of how to conceive the concept, not as something physical fetishize"2.

The way of abstracting or give value synthesis3 concepts that are inheritances from previous
generations we are mindsets: "Everyday life is presented as a reality interpreted by men and that
for them has the subjective meaning of a coherent world" (Berguer & Luckmann, 2001). Such
schemes become a reality that is dropped on us, which we interpretations schematic ways, when
interacting within society uses, certain mechanisms specialization4 to know certain phenomena
that are foreign to us, to the very humanity of which we are builders given our position as a human,
which we know more, every moment of social experience.

Our idea about the phenomena we observe, between order Kronos5we are calculated within short
intervals of time, we identified that studies of time cannot be seen as simple causalities of nature
or some pretension; apriori6to become measured with intense physical rigor, such differences in
our social order in reference to the standard time are similar in the way we think or project the
existence of our minds in society, unable to leave the routine forms which become the source of
our forms of perception, through socializing ethos7our language, behavior and knowledge about
human nature. At each stage of the Age of Mass Media8society has created a type of illusion; be

1
(Elias, Uber die Zeit , 1989)
2
Ibid; the conception on time.
3
The synthesis is used as, unity on the knowledge.
4
The specialization is internal wars among the sciences, in as definite.
5
In Greek language is Chorological time.
6
The most important debate into the Elias and Kant about the knowledge.
7
the characteristic spirit of a culture, era, or community as manifested in its attitudes and aspirations.
8
See, Gianni Vattimo: the transparent society.
held outside or in opposition almost same with nature around them; without the most primitive
times to our present time in our events, mankind has been unable to separate himself from his
instinct to survive as a group, such heritage can be determined by routine; "Consciousness is
always intentional, always points or addresses objects"9 This orientation towards objects with
which certain forms of relationship are set in lead a continuum between past events into the future
is one of the fundamental characteristics of human beings, their ability to synthesize concepts
expertise within a given time within the social progress10.

Such formations guidance leads us to that human groups they are inherent to an order of their
actions, in order to reach higher stages of evolution in its estrangement11 of being above, at a point
of time, called Wissen12 placing their expectations in a collective sense of its progress; such a
process is placed between the forms to be part of the object itself in exteriorization knowledge to
a specific group. These capabilities habituation to bring its action almost default in daily life so
instruct a system of rules that must expand to an entire social fabric and to be effective in the
behavior of the same group13 "Habituation implies that the action in question can run again in the
future in the same way and with the same economy of effort" (Berguer & Luckmann, 2001) in
both forms of regulation are essential to find the keys to our forms of: thinking, actions and oriented
in a particular social context, these intentions are self-imposed by the same human groups beget
in daily observation monitoring rules, norms and default to access a social world that exhibits and
coerces default action as an instrument without output processes14This delimits in each habitus in
its interpretation of reality that lives and not exhausted. Time learning occurs such as a coercive
mechanisms to human behavior, it seems that groups develop faster than others, tend to be more
rational in their decisions; They are distancing themselves more than human nature to place new
forms of guidance in every aspect of social reality, such factum 15 It is transmitted as something
unprecedented or established by the other of which figured "as a cause to established effects" this
routinization of knowledge16We are in a network of << know what we need to know >> how a

9
(Berguer & Luckmann, 2001), The social construction of reality
10
Social progress is an adaption, in as the society development into the specific periods on the time.
11
Estrangement is same to abstraction.
12
Wisdom.
13
Reference to Society.
14
The english reference system: Signal output.
15
a statement of the facts of a case.
16
Exactly definition is habitus.
kind of pragmatic implementation to solve the problem according to the mediations of our needs
in the social field where individuals grouped in a space are; but the land where the routinized or
learned life <I live in the world of common sense of everyday life equipped with specific bodies of
knowledge>>17All answers our ways to cope with the natural environment, to our own interests,
which are established by the perception of phenomena18 and how we interpret as an individual.

Imagine that reality which builds us generates social historical significances in its development
both individually and as a group, these differences called: Here and Now, the first thing is
understood as the physical body that is the view of exchanges between humans and the second as
space within the same time, an exact point of what we are, with respect to others. We get to know
our origins of family, mother, father. Etc. The age renews us, our corresponding behavior from
birth to reach the adult form, always finds biological processes to differentiate our way, which
does not limit the permanent stay in a now .The human being, has a capacity of synthesis to relate
their nature, the move forward in modeling the behavior of individual units for the purpose of the
group, conceived his own idea of relating to others: By contrast, relations between man and his
environment characterized by openness to the world19.

In its relational nature with others the socius human. In every moment of interaction with language
compared to others of their social environment by which recognizes their experience in past
generations, as: "No one comes, himself. We all inherit experience carrying inherited knowledge
of another generation " (Elias, 1989). This responds to the ways of thinking what we noted earlier,
these mental models of how natural phenomena conceive and attribute to society in ad hoc20 of
development.

But these schemes inherited anthropomorphic looks21which they are the result of product
knowledge that fail to understand humanity; between itself within a given space and time
influences the progress of knowledge in a tautological22this influence which we know as:
socialization such concept and thus these humanoid forms are inherited; on certain natural or

17
In as the daily life take sense, see: The social construction of reality in (Berguer & Luckmann, 2001).
18
Individual characters.
19
It is reference to experience.
20
created or done for a particular purpose as necessary
21
According with Elias: this form takes some concepts in appearance at humanity.
22
On the regress.
universal phenomena. This aspect should be aware that this socialization depends on the type of
society <complex and less-complex>23an exchange of experiences that regulates our ways of
thinking, the nature of our know-how standards body, as a kind of introjection in humanity results:
a coercive character of our ways of thinking and be able to understand the different states
awareness based in experience.

Thus, the significance of our experience, marked within the high-level synthesis which the human
mind, to make constructs from the general to the specific24, this perception individually calls it:
everyday life, social reality or society. It defined itself as a purely human product "Society is a
human product. The company is an objective reality. Man is a social product " (Berguer &
Luckmann, 2001). Understand that this objectivity, manage understood if we look at society as a
network of relationships and specific functions finite in the development of humanity delimitation
pointing to a more marked difference between society and nature25.

These differences lead us to the central analysis of figuration in time; how could understand the
man without the time?26 mention aspects of the ways in which humans create certain types of
coercions and are imposed upon themselves. Understand time as a structure not physical, but
beyond relations man and nature or the naked eye between subjective and objective. The
dimensions are to understand time; while a search for balance between natural and social
phenomena27. In the above factors within sociology, such annotation may be mentioned that
learning in the use of time; as a society is a mechanism, not only of coercion or duress is both a
center of community life; I mean to live as a distinct group in constant space.

The question refers to a search of humanity that has evolved in homo sapiens28, Which has
inherited from its predecessor’s solutions in a particular, development of knowledge of social
production; which differs from the genetic evolution of humanity29. We understand social
development as a process of great civilizational dimension within a timescale as one can

23
The society types in complex is reference to industrialization process and them not-complex is on the way
development.
24
Individual constructions, George Kelly.
25
Elias Norbert see: about the time.
26
Expression and distance, see Elias: engagement und Distanzierung.
27
Methodological position on the social figuration.
28
About the biological evolution.
29
The humanity reached a status on the universe.
understand the historical characteristics of the times, call it; behavior, fashion, etc. Objectification
of social development is a configuration among the many that exist in the universe if this difference
as mentioned: its social self-production character in itself as a continuous flow of space and time.
If there is no time, we could not orient ourselves in the physical space and target our subjectivity
would turn one poorly differentiated type animality30, take the time made not as a thing that could
be found through a physical process, their understanding is in the same sense that we give when
we arrived on time for an appointment working with a stipulated time.

This relationship between man and time, comes with experience of learning to behave in the middle
of society <<sense>> unfolding of the subjective orientation, we cannot switch roles for individual
decision, and we must at the beginning of introjection31 the times we live (Elias, 1989). Whenever
we drive by any context, we must bear in mind the amount of waiting, movements, distance,
conversations (routines) etc. the individual comes to understand the extent of his own life, as the
object itself same. A high distance32between his own humanity, as a rational being; what is the
purpose of time? It is the same man, has no other foundation than follow the guidance by default
in the conduct of social life, this procedure comes to be experienced as a form of institution time;
in the lives of men. a type of Introjection was mentioned, in a state extension from birth as an
individual, in a process of centering of society; which achieves a humanized des-development
increasingly with respect to the natural environment, how to verify spatiality of where we stand
temporarily, within which we can change the territories without obtaining biological changes in
the body, but if you change your social environment new rules on the use of the calendar, clocks,
timers, Numbers stations, flights etc. Securing the transfer from one reality to another simple way
to complex or vice-versa for which the adaptive capacity of men is becoming more standardized
in their own symbolic universe time.

Flow ratio between the time of human [societal] and running the [natural] universe, they are
manifested in every season within the accuracy; activities in order to achieve high production
value, with a synchronization or Kronos in order to the future33, this projection is the high value

30
The time correspond in a wonderful characteristic in create: symbolic system.
31
Socialization.
32
View Elias: Distanzierung.
33
In join to development.
of synthesis34 which has the concept of time to be treated as a specific relationship between human
beings who know their learning routines: << An institutional world, then is experienced as
objective reality, has a preceding the birth of the individual history and is not accessible his
biographical memoir >> (Berguer & Luckmann, 2001) once the time comes to an expression of
their servers institution in charge of regulating the actions of individuals, it generates kinds of
concepts that are universal to humanity; past, present and future as a natural transition that goes
unnoticed.

The idea of unity in the universal time as reproduction of human culture,35within certain societies
less complex or traditional; the illusions of autonomy that these concepts about human life "Time
is life" are created there is a theological relationship; to grant life to natural phenomena within a
causality explanation that takes possession of human lives on their way to the biological order.
Defined by language, creator of a system of symbols, these companies are a stage behind the
civilizing process36to conceive that social reality is a reflection of the entities with the intention of
controlling behaviors about themselves in a ghostly manner; and reflects on the time when no
reconstructions of the past, it becomes irrational and useless is a result of the socialization process
where learning traditions are central and values within a given context; to understand the time it
takes from the past to project a stable and a more differentiated determinations present social
progress.

You know the social reality objectively, we debate the differences in science and consciousness;
It is formed in certain areas [companies], the development of the physical sciences as an ideal
scientific model and defined by the types of specialties in knowing the nature to control the product
of consciousness as being objectivization, defines us the idea of man as knower in order to
experience this nature. This model of knowledge to the physical or social objects generates an
interaction between: behavior, rationality, knowledge and language; It takes its meanings to be
expressed by universal symbols which are understood globally which society recognizes and can
create according to their needs; An example of synthesis is large clock; Circular this device
classification intervals, measuring social apparatus by which it is driven. Generates universal

34
Refer the potential capacity in orientation.
35
See Luhmann: General Theory of System: chapter III.
36
(Elias, Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation, 1939).
information, each person can read and set the clock by its passing in each hand an ethos listed with
social correctness which it was created.

In everyday life, which permeates every aspect of relationship through the routinization of life
patterns, they are having an effect on every decision within its framework "Human existence is
developed empirically in a context of order, direction and stability" (Berguer & Luckmann, 2001).
A collective teaching and their own language, has its own autonomy observation based on
symbolic systems that are part of the environment and human development being built; the
significance of what we are in the same social network, homo socius is always social cannot get
away from individual buildings as well in his life thrown into the road outside objects. The
instrumental idea of reason37is oriented within spaces in their daily activities with others, what
their identity in relation to space, which is shared collectively. But it responds to the social
demands of the moment where your consciousness is determined by a specific reality, a specific
language is a reflection of this relationship; as forming the real world, "the limits of my language
are the limits of my knowledge"38. The concept of time is coercions producer who master both
balance between nature and society, forcing the latter to be obeyed by its permanent development
of the human hand that is generated in their own social progress. Thus, all social figuration is the
relationship of humans with other humans within a historical and social evolution determined by
their knowledge of reality.

Congruence of reality as being socializing with others within the community must generate a type
of orientation within the same reality that has become known as a social and open to their abilities
progress being. Forms determine orientation relative to non-humans, whether man is the product
itself, time as regulator activities is considered, only a means to an end; Linearity this purpose
intends to seek an outlet when not, logical answers about themselves. To understand this linear
purpose, it can sustain a system of shared rationality between signifiers that are only products
themselves << determined on what we call symbols>39> Or systems of meanings, which are
created as a routinization of common knowledge. A worldview the individual who is the product
of a civilization which has expired form of animality to orientate within the physical nature and
develop their life as unique. Runout of man and nature, is nothing more than a physical observation

37
See: The instrumental reason, Frankfurt School.
38
See: Ludwig Wiggestein; Tractatus logico-philosophicus.
39
As human construction.
of the present, without taking into account that this whole system of meanings, precedes our
existence within society itself. If everyday life by definition is guided by pragmatism a social
process for the production of a well on the nature, understand time is to put man back to nature.
Even within the same, social causality; always the line of progress is survival (as a natural instinct
guide)40In order to organize more appropriate levels of social integration, the previous ones. Each
time it aims to synthesis levels higher, this demonstration held catectar41 natural objects, to brings
us to knowledge and social production. Time functions as a symbol within the social structure in
a direction dimension "is not possible only in space, but it is located in time"42 The result is the
creation of a specific function within the collective life that takes place, with the renewal of new
concepts in language that function as representations of physical objects or nature.

Relatedness between a symbol and its meaning is social development within a specific human
organization, determine the appearance of language as action oriented, as an innate ability of
individuals in every society "the ability to control patterns of language and knowledge in a society,
often it concomitant in the distribution of power in society43" these forms of representation of the
guidelines articulated in a specific speech, we respond to the type of organization to be transmitted
through a communication process. The word as a concept, is a type of representation of physical
and social objects, an innate synthesis shape biological apparatus, leading to joint representations
to a large number of individuals as common language within a specific region <space >. We can
see that society is composed of individuals whom; They have relations and specific functions
within its own existence. It relates both human and biological and social unity, learning
compensation for their welfare, a whole shared reference of a self-image of interdependent agents
for their very survival.

When entries are made about the finiteness of space contexts; differences in forms of learning the
same language are established "that limits communication" in a prototypical reality44. In reference
to a limit, it is understood that each society differs from their forms of language here may result
from different processes of civilization that man has brought upon himself. There may be

40
Instincts depends of period on the history.
41
See: Action Theory; Parsons Talcott.
42
The means take some periods on the human development.
43
Cite: Symbol Theory, Elias Norbert.
44
Denoting the first, original, or typical form of something.
languages, but their intentionality, it is an orientation from individuality to the collective, the group
of speakers that are specific relationships in a specific integration within the same common space.

Sound forms are guidelines only men able to articulate in full of their biological development, we
highlight the idea of a kind of imperative within the language: it is in one unification, which has
limits to stick a whole group of individuals. To keep its communicative function. This group is
determined by your own knowledge itself facing a reality constituted by other human beings who
can communicate and interpret the meanings of their language. One possibility in this self-
realization, ends at two points of difference from the environment animality, the first biological
evolution is understood as a transmission type and changes an organic structure called genes. The
second social development; within developmental stages of the human being,

This generates the transmission media survival within these two possibilities a difference is
achieved in the same reference for understanding that the biological evolution of human being is
linear which becomes a start progressively. Unlike the progress that is designed purely social, as a
product of human relations45 this is not linear, nor even as we have clarified above differs from the
levels of synthesis of each context in our case, every society: The language and its diversity is not
species specific, but the social group where they interact46.

The language is understood as a communication process, the learning itself "naturally human
beings, do not have a language, but a natural disposition to learn"47 this arrangement is a
difference between the power of learning between humans to conceive the sense orientation within
a particular group. But the lapse transfers a common sound to transform it as language [words],
again in reference between the pre-human and human is achieved differentiate within the transition
to the forms of objectivity, that wash on consciousness, which manages framed within the same
instinct of survival to the non-human, these kinds of differences that manage their own systems
about themselves Selbst48. But this difference depends on each group to articulate their own
language and generates developmental changes over themselves as an order understood as sui-
generis, the interdependence between human and non-human refers to our specific form of

45
As entanglements.
46
Exchange among society.
47
The faculties as human.
48
Come to themselves.
biological evolution, language as a means of communication between the same species, such
representation of the world with its unique congruence humans.

We have previously alluded to the idea of common life understood, every day, in society in order
to communicate with symbols developed within the social experience as a principle of symbolic
emancipation49about nature. This symbolic representation is learned individually and directed
toward the collective, to implement sound guidelines50that give meaning to a specific group its
own symbolic system. We can call it a kind of reference for each group to devise their own social
reality: thinking, speaking, etc. Each sound pattern with significance comes to dominate the
collective life, submerging the individual a predetermined composition about themselves. As it
regards the predetermination will call back play, on that later. Sound guidelines, understood as
words51 clearly represent human data within the same playback reference themselves.

We have reached the point between the physical sense unnatural understood as culture. This
responds to a form ab-quo52 It is limited as system itself, storing and achieve symbolic
manipulation in acquire the character which would be useful illustrate: the ego of an individual, it
formed from the face to face relationship within a common space to mean: the ego is not like this
intentionally thrown over the other53this on the alter. The ego can lead us to a figuration specified
as dialogue with other individual to access the human universe, through symbolic communication
that we have described above people, the way of thinking between subject and object a purely
methodological way of human rationality through experience. This is a figuration that: makes
sound patterns (ego), each object and regularized by a company (alter) .... What to know is
symbolized. This possibility of knowledge is regulated by the collective alter a society in specific.

Each phrase or word can be termed as a physical fact as it is between the relationship of meaning
between the individual and action aimed at the collective, this dyad must answer the sympathy of
communication to understand the symbols of a shared or common space as explained above, this
creates the idea of orientation between space shared this functional idea of linking the individual
to the collective, carries a specific process to channel and guide the conduct of the individuum in

49
According to way in adaption the symbol as orientation.
50
Born to words.
51
Symbol, representation on human group.
52
Reference: starting to.
53
See: Ego Transcendecnia in Sartre J.
its specific context of socialization with language learning generating integration in the same space
environment.

The language manages to inject its individual elements standardization exercises power over
speakers, but their regularity depends on the community, to the individual as self-regulation among
the egos that are led by the alter, for the welfare of its symbolic organization. It is possible without
this capacity of the human being in order to create a universe out of nature stand as creator of his
own social sense, it was hard not to get out of the pre-human mindsets undoubtedly have a
biological ability to abstracting by means of concepts that represent a physical reality.

Each symbolic meaning is a creation in time, represented in space by which the orientation
continuum of social progress arises. This faculty to create new symbols is a leap into new
experiences "individuals leave margins grammatical" within the sound practice as a kind of sound
network, which manages symbolically represent knowledge of a society. We can denote that the
symbol is placed in three positions within our work: the first function of symbols as a means of
orientation. Second function as a means of communication, understood as language. Finally, as
though in its role as a means of investigating a company within the levels specified synthesis54
understood as to symbolize the image and storage place within the social memory or experience
that is outside the individual55. For this reason, storage is added the idea of tradition in the
transmission of values to the members of each symbolic system, this way you can gain an
understanding of the concepts are representations of a point in time in which they were created for
the next generation which inherits its membership in the same social group and on the individual
can achieve progress surplus higher than the previous one.

In the same social space <company> we can bring that knowledge and thought have the same level
of synthesis, I refer in the idea of the experience stored in the social consciousness, which becomes
that knowledge is a long history of generations of inheritances that are projected themselves into
thinking later. Language as a unit implies, is a type of object representation as a means of
orientation, which becomes a way of knowing within generational structures composed of human
beings communicate with their language knowledge within.

54
Human capacity.
55
The storage in reference at determination on the social fact.
We could take our analysis outside the margins of the theory of knowledge that predisposed a
subject and an object. In society as we have developed there is a feeling of living integrated as a
group, follow this idea could be called: human society at a level of nature as jumping humanity
towards regulating itself as an essential component of progress human, would be achieved clear
the idea that a point of time and space; humans began to free themselves from their animal instinct
to reach a standardized social order in introject each individual a default reference on the
phenomena of nature.

In this way we can conceive what <we are and where we come from> to free ourselves from
phantom categories that have no cognitive value, I mean our intention to introduce the theory of
time without theological masks. Based on the knowledge of the <intergenerational> experience as
emphasized in reading symbols it is achieved conceive the kind of knowledge of each society, but
our reference is the social knowledge. Where in some forms of knowledge become pre-human,
where the ghost or fancy shapes called a type of congruence dominate56 with reality itself is
temporary57. We have reached a conclusion: the symbolic dimension, has a place in space and
time, in each context with differences in learning a language, a social source of knowledge, as
individual contribution which is achieved elucidate the interaction between alter ego and
knowledge in the us << versus the I >>. Such knowledge as we have played has a faculty that is
coexistence as a social group, to ensure survival of humanity within our theory two standard
deviations is discussed within the theory of the cogito ergo sum and the same ways of knowing
the world physical.

We have understood that the human being, and emphasis on the word being done, because it
denotes a spatial temporality in the current social progress, biological potential through the
encounter of an individual with other individuals who have shared knowledge, having same
language with symbols socially implanted and these in turn as reservoirs of knowledge to survive
as a group.

The communication process understood as a network of relationships between individuals, with

symbolic knowledge is not separate from human communication. This form of interaction of sound
patterns, concludes that nothing has a place in space and time "alone" without the representation

56
A border knowledge as if it existed.
57
Positive Course; Comte A.
of the sound symbol (spoken word). Nothing also not in time and space may have the character of
a sound symbol.

The closeness between language knowledge joins a symbol in this case, the symbolic importance
of time you've been a process of generational learning, based on the experience of social norms
with which an individual predetermination of new generations is achieved, this responds in social
communication based transfer these forms of space knowledge for the survival of the human group
(society), this power of integration is understood as progress in expanding its structure in view of
the past58.

58
In go to the past and see the specific forms in the history, as a real explanation for historical-social process.
 II

Individual Behavior

De Civilitie murum puerilium59

It has presented the idea of time as a specific relationship between man60and nature which in its
very specificity, creates values-based learning a language with its symbolic value within the same
space representation. Now we discuss these variations between one of the positions, knowledge of
the individual who owes his unit to a specific context of roles and relationships is called Society.
We can know is a specific way of transmitting traditions, concepts or the same form of behavior.
In fact, one of the points of importance in understanding the specificity of time with the movement
of composition in civilization, culture and society as not only giving individual result, but as a
social group specific training.

What we can understand as a society within the generality which we belong, as we define by the
same word makes us a specific self-consciousness, which act as individuals in a context. To
formulate an individuality, we can think about our introjection of norms within the inherited
behavior under the most natural ways in which one lives in a society. The same knowledge about
what we can or should not function as an attracted body's regulation on the body, our focus is
oriented on the social scheme, which determines our fulfillment as a human completely detached
from irrational emotions that we may appear in our instinct in daily life.

Achieving this control perceive naturally, human society has a result that is not harmonious; I
mean finding the right along with others facing the potential of individual existence, society is
more or less open views, whatever they look, we are open to the temporal sphere between past and
future. Tracking between the temporal figuration of dynamic cultures are set within an
intermediate period, which responds to the inheritance of reality, with its distinctive character as a
kind of national consciousness of each people. The statement non-harmonic result would give us
an idea about the whole time as a standard set under its own rules of socialization, framed under
the character of a social order. We could illustrate an example61The visit to a specific city metro,

59
(Rotterdom, 1463).
60
Here is a reference to: Humanity.
61
Empirical experiment in observed on Moscow Metro.
the individual who is oriented under the signs of input and output is aware of the language of
society where it is, this what coerces his behavior on and off the subway, now each unit subway
<wagon> is a container containing human beings and they respond uniquely to their existence,
each individual within the wagon has a specific social formation: name, age, birth, work etc. The
non-harmonic is the understanding of each of these specific forms of knowledge of individual life
in live with different behaviors and functions.

Now a figuration in the subway could denote, by the entrance to the wagon; we define it as a
specific type of relationship (ticket purchase, record bags, assign a seat), there could be three types
of figurations to respond to a civilizing process62specific, resulting in the behavior of both, inside
and outside the car. This would give us that human reality has a generality: the ability to regulate
individual life to a function of the social clock, in our example the social watch is the passage of
stations with individual time, this synchrony of serious activities the defining uses the subway
before choosing a car bus or taxi.

There are specific ways of living, they defined its relationship with the social environment in which
they are found within this specific people63they are immersed in a functional structure, by its very
definition we can take the individual life of each passenger in the subway. This forms a mobile
network which forms their character, we suggest that in the construction of both personality as a
result; of a certain type of social coercion of the social structure to individuals; the formation of
his character against the inner <privacy> behavior as an external <public life> is the relationship
with nature that there is no ego only because all its action is intended to alter functionally, this
direction we call "functional interdependence "64 and context of shared functions is called society.

The existence of relations between the individual and society is in a unique way65, we mean within
the social network every human subjectively interprets the idea of society. Their relationship is
unique with respect to its function somehow in its very nature human beings, linking them to
society is the basic layout of your own nature which above, responding to their survival announced
as: group. Somehow our ability to capture natural phenomena in order to assimilate them as their

62
It is understood in the regulation of individual behavior.
63
Individual as unique.
64
Figuration Concept.
65
See: individual Society; Elias N.
own; this capability is based on field experience; it can be seen that the individual human being
conceived by another, interdependence towards its middle, as a social integration unit.

A fundamental element of human existence is the simultaneous coexistence of several people with
others face-recognition << face >>66It is one of the variables interaction. To recognize certain
degree of socialization of this recognition with the other society as an integrative unit contains
within it; a mode of social activation "with this language and their ways of meanings or symbols"
are apprehended; in this mode control input speech carries formation behaviors in every age and
social group specific. With this the idea of high levels of synthesis67it takes that society itself is a
moving unit which constantly renews their way to advance within time and space stipulated with
individuals who work and interact. Individuals are constantly being formed and becoming within
their relationships with others within the same society linked to interlacing.

Therefore, in biological development to adulthood, the individuality of the elderly can only be
understood from its destination, relationship with society. Adulthood as a figuration of temporality
towards acquiring new knowledge, not only complicates the individual life achieved by creating
new relationships with social layers that precede it, adulthood is a figure of time has been
determined through experience collective society "is considered that individual adult form is a
specific form of society"68and so may denote the collective progress of it. In the process of
composition, we can see that society behaves like a forward flow without stopping at its
irreversibility in time, their individual development is a range of collective consciousness that has
formed, that way of thinking and feeling. Modeling the social fabric that manages to cover each
component generally creating specific differences of its elements in coexistence, you can see the
civilizing progress in the behavioral relationships between individuals.

And modeling of consciousness is restricted in emotions, which can manifest the link between
self-constraints on themselves, which are understood to be part of the specific social integration,
put on a temporalizing balance the passions, tastes and achieve balance; difficult and it is great the
likelihood of an individual fail in one or the other aspect, which the individual fails to achieve the
balance between personal inclinations and social duties69.The regulative idea of passions led by a

66
Interaction on the daily life.
67
Reference to Abstraction.
68
Adult is a representation of individual formers.
69
In as the social mechanics adopted control on the individual.
introjected behavior through an individual genesis which is carried by the social environment in
the emergence of social normalized clock; with which to be missed the subjective importance to
the fact collective, the society has somehow a perfect link between individual and collective
experience deriving it from the human being to interpret its own nature.

Earlier this interlacing process, leads us to an order together as a social group, simply take again
the example of the metro; this figure represents in a community a symbol of efficiency, speed,
custom and comfort. The passenger <X> takes as relational as within your consciousness the order
of the seasons, to reach a station <Y>, in this process the idea of order is innate is out of their
individuality, the guide tube is time of social space <timeshare>, cannot pass without stopping
stations at once, cannot go faster than regulated, the order belongs to the social framework that
gives guidance to use in everyday life.

The existence of the order is placed within the social integration as a need to live with others, an
approach within the individual behavior would be achieved verify such need with regard to
proximity, to live as social beings. If it is within our genetic nature << could they understand that
the study of time, is to understand man within nature >> if time is a form of guidance which uses
resources post within the transmission of knowledge are: traditional, rational, scientific. Etc. The
men70They are a perfect biological synthesis unit that keeps constant relation to their natural
survival instincts, using the means that can meet through their generations; in which time is a factor
of human creation, as a determination of its own nature, by which creates the effect of self-coercion
in their individual lives toward an end that is life in society.

These effects are self-imposed processes, the passage of generations, we have a type of psychic
compartment71such as: reason, soul, conscience or instincts a nexus of differentiation in humans
comes from different groups "this creates differences in common or different relationships" while
we understand that human beings are configured themselves and others with a clearer conscience.
Each unit of consciousness is represented in a specific training between the relationships between
individuals from different social backgrounds and social movement with its upstream and
downstream processes is faster. It could be interpreted that, in this inquiry, sociological considered
that conscience only plays a role of materialization, but in reality, the consciousness is conceived

70
Reference to humanity.
71
Socialization process from the Elias conception.
as a human product within his own humanity that behaves according to the social progress of its
compartments.

Specifically our formation as a social product is to be treated in certain ways self-direction of a

human being in relation to other persons or things; these forms continually reform consciousness,
taking her with new forms of domination introjected individuality new values of behavior to be
exhibited in society and greater control in their daily habits in terms of the orientation of its goals
within the social framework that can create interaction with other elements, only in this way can
be achieved relational self-control to be directed towards the other; understood as behavior.
Differentiation behavior is largely the result of socialization of values, created in partnership we
can call as a certain code of behavior every time they give; the integration of individuals in those
individual forms of behavior that become necessary structures and the situation of their society.
As human biological unit shares itself, a physical form and other organic purely; internal and
external processes; at the junction of his corporeal man unit tends to relate functionally as a special
form of flexibility capable of conformity in accordance and within the prevailing society breaks
biology and sociology with behavior in the forms of self-directed towards the others.

If we set specific organic forms of behavior one that responds to instinct, organic is coerced by the
social space outside with which it is in constant communication. Psychic address of the individual
is a response of social modeling "relationships between individuals" there is a direct targeting of
each group on its individual elements, where the primary interaction between individuals reshapes
the character regarding the origin of the group.72The essence of behavior is a social and
psychological materialization again emphasis is each time defined manners that are induced by a
society that is in a process of civilizing, could take an example medieval forms compared to
modern forms in approaching the table when the meat was taken:

"In the Middle Ages there was a more direct way of relating to meat put on the table, the constitution
in the model behavior that had reference to God geocentric mode. While the secular upper class ate
meat in excess, in monasteries by diet were vegetarians and this criticized the rich and gluttons, at
this time could eat huge pieces individually, the animal was served completely in the center the table
...... but in the modern age showed ways to serve more sensitive to dismember the flesh, and the
whole animal is not served ... way. Showed sensitivity civilizational advance in the use of knife, fork

72
As we are with others "the US and I".
 when approaching the table, distinctions in approaching the table,(Elias, Über den der Prozeß
Zivilisation, 1939).

The line behaviors that we could view schematically makes us need to think a little more deeply
about the role of humans within which we are parties, both natural and social order, it would
require an ellipse in time to turn away from complements reason a priori to try to see that every
individual life there is a chain of experiences that have resulted from their own experiences, do not
want to get closer to a position out of context, but the fact of belonging to an order social renews
the idea of human nature against society.

Human behaviors have been reflected as a mechanism of social coercion to obtain a direction
towards social progress, marking this action generates an assertively in the correct use of the
meanings over time. We can clarify that social skills are a type of adaptation to other environments
that can generate higher differences; the appearance of time as a form of high-level synthesis, as
to the direction of the individual actions, are as a set of fields between social this dominated by the
dynamic society, and at the other end a single figure which renews forms of knowledge-based
synthesis; time is not only a social product but is beyond the permitted levels of society, it is
looking at the breakdown of the ordinary, with this scheme in temporize human activities at certain
intervals it sets us that between individual and collective there is only one kind of relationship that
cannot be marked with relational interdependence, the existence of both senses respond to the need
within the mindsets, we can get into the same time, if in every civilization has surely different from
us meanings but nevertheless the only variables which remains valid is the need for guidance, the
continuum cannot be explained as a minimalist or historical variation, if the same man does not fit
into individual experience so, literature knows only its relational existence with others in view of
their own forms of culture based on small spaces atomism regularized 73within the same society,
thinking individual forms as elements is to achieve a breakthrough in the dispersion time and same
transformation along with the man since his appearance in material life. The transformation
beforehand did not exist in human nature, there has been a small relative autonomy from the
environment, thus giving them guidelines increasingly rational behavior for their welfare in favor
of its existence under the self-belief in their ability to the non-human. This emancipatory form
relative autonomy is based on the manipulation of goods for their well-being, a manifestation of

73
See: individual society, Baumann S.
rational power to create objects at your disposal with the idea of pacification of interests, not only
economically, this appearance psyches as a specific rationally, generates a result within a particular
figuration cosmos from the natural cosmos, this is what is called a new cosmovision74. Which
responds to this: dependence on one another, there are only people at any, or with us, but this kind
of belongings it as a way of monopolizing regular power tensions between social functions, in
order to structure human coexistence between power and survival; for example, it is: in the West
coercion social interlacing [imposition] evolve in a civilization75.

Observing the civilization process as a result of interweaving and alter-ego is concluded in creation
of an environment in which humans are for them and the other a type of mobile perpetual. With
the idea of creating objects for their welfare, we could imagine a forest full of natural objects to
the same provision which could generate welfare to his group, but its control is somehow
effectively man needs a medium which it can orient in some intervals that are permitted to use
their weapons, which can exercise its power of rationality. But the forest could denote the potential
of all time, which cannot be handled so there must be a priori notion of dangers to the pursuit of
the interests, all shows a generality what man can take within its possibility is the orientation from
the introjection of inherited knowledge. Time is the forest, which we only based on human nature
in order to grasp knowledge, objects and generate some differences within our relationships, the
forest does not change what is restructured is social progress, when the idea is put before action:
it will be that time, apart from being a kind of orientation is a disorder displeasure, perceived nature
of our sensibility appears in a standardized way to understand the regulation of social life is part
of herself. The idea of living of unemployed above, the idea of a sense of autonomy was taken,
that achievement through consolidation, production of goods. But under the group scheme which
places control of their own forms of guidance; It is making a marked difference with respect to the
immediate desires and personal patriotisms76to understand that humanity in its ongoing
development; and finds groups in training "in the past has sprung their own time" who have been
involved under its own laws, for example; The story tells of coercions about living people, with

74
Put on the center the conceptualization as time.
75
(Elias, Über den der Prozeß Zivilisation, 1939).
76
On the individual and society.
this refers to the process chain of civilization that has been referred to the behavior that gives an
origin of individual success under the social scheme is required within each of the times77.

As we approach the idea of human history with sociological understanding we can denote that the
idea of social fabric which made us as we socialize, we are presented with a very rigid manner and
elastic78 where different levels of differentiation that generates the kinds of decisions that are made
by the individual character which is formed within the same social need, but such possibilities in
deciding have their own limits are, what has been called the predetermination of the social
structure.

We have turned the idea of time, not only based on a kind of regulation we can also see that we
live with temporalized intervals reflect the type of society that produces a particular social fabric,
which the individual cannot break or escape; a temporary demarcation of human life within their
own ways of living together among themselves. The elasticity of the social fabric is cumulative
recurrence time of each element is a permanent maintenance mode in use finding relationships that
are located within its importance, creating a type of linkage thereon of its kind in relation power,
demonstrating the capacity rigid about themselves; and time is a constant relating under the scheme
of elasticity and rigidity that has been exposed.

This type of exchange that takes the character, personality recognition with each other, anticipates
certain pathological forms of social life understood as forms of introject a type of power; this
expression rigid and less differentiated special scope in a range of own decision, determines social
positions to influence people self-direction and destiny. The concept of power we have interpreted
as time, taking membership of a social position and influence others under a normalizing scheme
within their own activities; using a ius-naturalista life towards a more rational under temporary
schemes that are used to maintain social order which we are defined by the biological idea of the
body, these forms of generations, are seen as an element of renewal during times towards a social
purpose; such as group living under the same idea of society. The above time, the new layers
influence in a dynamic movement. It's like living inside a pyramid 79The individual against the
universal knowledge is at the tip of the triangle generations have produced all social knowledge;

77
See: The Sociology of Genius: Mozart.
78
Elastic is change.
79
Idea of quantum physics as regards knowledge.
the individual down to a level in the search for answers, to get them back to the top of the pyramid;
an exercise in finite form, until a new generation to understand the dynamic exchange of
knowledge resulting from the idea of a timeshare under the social fabric itself.

The individual belongs to the other, in a single bound to self-regulate other individuals. That
direction complements the idea of the pyramid, everything known is a form of civilization for
others that exist at the time, or for those who will be part of history in the period ahead of time. In
our scheme you can disappear the idea of the subjective and the objective, therefore we have come
a type of conclusion: society is not only what leveler and typified, but also individualized. Raising
awareness levels of individuality can reach, realize the idea of relationship between individuals
and the types of actions carried out under the scheme of knowledge which form the psyche, we
understand the function of behavior relative to the direction of orientation based on the coexistence
of human beings under the same space, it contained specific relationships as individuals are
directed to the social fabric, called society. Denote specific to appear with the other forms, it is a
human way of guidance and direction within its own framework, with this; the individual can only
be understood, from and within its coexistence with others. The presentation before others;
behavior depends on the same relationship with others such as a leitmotiv80 a formulation between
me who defend their action within us. One position to understand the heritage of knowledge, as
we have called knowledge located within society as a type of memory. Now as humans, they can
be called society within which they can interact only individuals; outside us, what happens is an
individual interaction that connects to relationships with other specifically; at one point in time,
you decide where you ought to conduct on social standards should coerce individual emotions, to
achieve social integration that falls within their needs.

We have located the meaning of figuration within spaces, language, everyday life and behavior,
the latter taken as a form of guidance within societies advancing in the processes of civilization,
for now what we propose is to differentiate time as an object relationship as a dynamic system,
which is created within the society itself. This formulation lead to a sociological abstraction
scheme, where the forms of meaning taken from the command concept, as we have stated
previously carries within itself a scheme reduced complexity81 therefore our analysis is part of an

80
A recurrent theme throughout a musical or literary composition, associated with a particular person, idea, or
situation.
81
To refer as, a methodological position for understand the time as system.
open point towards a theory to explain the time, which we understand as a relationship between
figuration and social integration.

III

The Temporary System

Previously to tried the description of the general characteristics of social and historic forms, but
now our focus is: the time as a system; this section at system such for understand the movement
on the society and them as the temporary reformulate the real life or as we to know these, daily
life. if we understand the society or social groups as a: relations and function, well this our central
point. The ideas the system are functional categories for to be clearly, the time into the sociology
before to start, get to examples from the daily life.

Each human creates, property comfortable spaces for maintained the life. The characteristics you
can see in anywhere; specifically on of the private sense and public sense; the comfortable create
some barriers for beneficial peoples who live, work or any activities inside of the spaces but these
is just an argument for specifically relations into of the spaces what we knows as institution, home,
parks, market when all this create one specifically force, all this orientation for the society as a
system. In this section you can getting the principal postulate difference82 in the social life versus
natural environment.

Think as system, moves us away at complex schemes into of the time; by now the relations and
function, we are going to place them as a dynamic, all connection is in movement and continuant
reconnection nothing is static in special the society what, is the constant changing. Every day the
humanity removed the oldest structure found on the past and them put new, structure starting from
the new experiences83 but the society could be an entirety, this terms in our enquiry is a reduced
complexity.

The entirety gives us a view in general perspective without, forget what social life substantial
component for the new theory of the time. While us think as system the time took the central in
our schemes and this point have around of this, the particular connection could to call; context and

82
See: Luhmann N. about the difference.
83
The social groups produce new knowledge for more complex situation.
on the specific spaces. The last specific spaces are what we know as “society”84 look the position
get the social groups inside on the time but for this we don’t mean what the society is a handful of
humans unlike these inquiry is walking in as understand the human nature, on the environment.

However, when we use the system according as structure is a signal for can compared, two times
in the same way the first complexity and transparence. These characteristics to form the universal
aspects as the self-reference85 and social system here is as the system create the famous and
necessary difference. Before to explain the central idea into the environment and group (system) I
think in take the paper of the individual action; first the individual human is not a system86 because
of leaves clear this, the human is on the environment in as this being go through sometimes the
life without matters; individual people ever go according the social order and this case produce
from the system

The second the timing is once request for work on the social order, nothing is out of the order
because these on the ways, whereby each individual life took direction at the system. The concept
of direction is not a mechanical, this determined the action into the individual goals 87 as an end;
just this is not some schemes for think out of the society; it is rather a bridge between system and
time that really social production in our supposed each material stuff could to take decision based
in the possibility of evolution.

The experience as knowledge, here is, the possibility goes more away in the normal
predetermination to causes in new universes; above the timing it’s a supplement of individual
position when, the social activities need an agreement for the next level, just if each element is
organized with social system, without: protest, wars etc. In the system the time is observed for
each element, regularly is not necessary because is a universal means88 the elements
(individualized) had a suitable socialization and they put in practice as social norms. The rules of
individualized life in its learned process is the most important capacity for understand the social
symbolic; each child in first ten years have standardization which regulate the emotion according
with the social structure, I mean at the behavior.

84
Social System.
85
About the Selbst (go to themselves)
86
See: Luhmann N. Is required into the systematic theory.
87
Here goals to refer as, functional idea.
88
For example: each people to able read the hours.
The process is denominate: self-coaction, before it was explained what a request for the
coexistence is together in the society, but now we see what the society is consequence of one order
which one, all individuum belongs to time and this has one limits call: system.

Demonstrate the systems limits in see through of the elements as production89 once mode to back
in the object (society) in took the little complex part and understand, this part as a reduction but
therefore is not less complex, unlike renew the idea as reproduction. The system uses as a reference
in orientation with the environment at the same time that create difference and its produces opening
on the interior, remember that each element in according with development and them the observer
as self-reference90. On the way the reproduction is the manipulation in this difference, as survive
before the environment; for these reasons each element has not last because the incessant
production is determined with the relation of the environment.

The function inside on the system is create ties among interior and exterior components, for take
as reference the difference what is inside of the process “self-reference” exist system which
establishes relations with themselves and its relations with the environment” but here, where is the
time, result as some abstractions? The time is ubicate in center of the system which, is making
difference among the elements what them returned at system, this cycle denominate reproduction
of the timing in each interval and like the same time with the environment; this requirement at
basic for the uses optimal of element its reproduction continuum.

The abstractions is taken as explanation for understand the internal relations of reproduction, if
each people know as to uses the clock in anywhere, the time is real relations among individuum
who created ties for understand the orientation into the society, but the system is not time, on the
contrary the system requirement, intervals as measure of that social relations; any people can
change the interval for property benefits, the regulations is inside on the system for what the
individuum can be read the guide on the activities. Could be, the self-reference are the people?
Our answers are never because the human is not unique system, each individuum 91 need another
individuum (interaction) for live and coexistence, so the self-reference is a level inside on the
system. The role of the individual in join with the reproduction is under the command of the system

89
In Luhmann is a Synonymy.
90
Reproduction.
91
From German in english: individual person.
and them of time, the effect of this sway is the articulation of the self-reference in back to inside
or the center of the organizations in an equilibrate selbst.

The conservations of system depend the difference with its environment; but this represent once
fundamental postulates in join the time and the rationalization; this movement among production
and reproduction generate the limits92 in each system on the interior the time everywhere required
limits for the ideal functionally; on the world each region has property timing in count the interval
its numerical time. These limits represent the unity of environment and system each relation it’s
the interior is demarcated for opening horizon. When saying opening, we refer to the concept of
evolution inside on the time at the same time that, change the knowledge structure because this
means that each elements is in constant evolution; now the time is demonstrate as unique system
in respect with the environment “if the society change its orientation sense, the time disappear”93
the force is what on center of the system moves its direction counter the environment and cause
others possibility for the future.

On the system theory establishes that; the system produces property environment this explanation
is around to the eternal circle on the social life, but Is same on the time? If it were true the time
would be same on the universe, but in our opinion is not really real, the time create patrons for
differentiate in each territory in according with the system. The time is not a circle but if is a
continuum, keep going to the past, present and future these are the limits of the time (social
delimitation) if were a circle maybe every day the people go to same park or school and never
change.

As we said, the time is a relation and therefore change with respect to socialization process; it
seems a kind of causality94 among time and system; now this causality is a compression of the
observers, call individual elements in as the production of the system take control of causes that
are product in movement with the system; the reaction in this position is due to observation of
phenomenon inside on the society, the conception that are out the human mentality is designated
for social system. We have advanced another level, the compression of the production these

92
Conservation of the system.
93
Own idea.
94
Refer to: Reaction and effect.
elements95 not as a natural explanation, if not as selection advantage inside on the difference for
verify the attitude of each elements on the way of two or more its connection.

However, this connection on the system, its bring with it a decomposition around of the parts in
each elements and relations; its specifically count of rational manner in can to related to each other
in order to make an enumeration. Each element is a unity not reducible of the complex system; but
on the consequences as temporalized the action into the structure is more difficult in definite
because the individual action, it’s never can reducible at the awareness if not, at distributions of
the social process. A element have conditioned that can see as relation among themselves for
achieve the possible called; limitation effect “constrains” it may look that, the element respond to
effective relations and this reproduction of each element with constrains, as a manner of measure;
the interval on the time is a figuration on the individual decision; by now come closer at more
complexity in understand the relations as organizations.

The time its original version96 make a specific organization called; chronologic, perception on the
system for the effective action in go to for away on the future in organized not just the individual
experience is as a complexity organization under selective relations among the systems that tried
in connected its coupling in pro of the systematic relations and them to bring more elements.

We have seemed that the “self-reference” is a mode must be (internalized)97 for the system; is
socialization capacity in conservation its priorities. The selection in action put in alert, when the
elements is not according or functional pieces into the internal process; for example, what
happened if the time or timing, interval change? The first if the time change, must be that each
element is provocateur some anomalies, out of the ordinal order and this is not effective for another
function to mode as contingence, the second that, perception what is outside of us; not change if
the element not change the specific relations, but the time as perception result a mistake, because
the individual sense is just that individuum, if the systematic time to want place change need the
relations and action to work together. On the time can take, specific information that denominate
period in the human history; if the information98 don’t get registration inside on the system, the

95
To reference: individual.
96
Common sense.
97
This an introjection of norms but this, is unit idea from Elias at Luhmann.
98
To refer: knowledge.
socialization process, would lose meaning within a context, would be impossible to determine the
age its elements and therefore its specifically function.

The process of information is a request for the function according with the elements and inside
determined for the individual relations among themselves; as an observation of this
interdependence take place; the human consciousness, addresses the real objects in as know them
as constitutive unity, the real or unreal is resolved into to the experience everything we can to
know in our existence consist with expectation of learning process; supposed on the imagination
a day lets wake up in unknown place and there the peoples talk different languages; how to you
could take orientation? If the context is completely unknown for us. This a constitutive unity that
comprises therefore; knowledge, socialization, learned into the individual experience and this it
comes from to others.

To understand that elements constitute relations for this reason the time involved of importance as
dynamic in join to action for the determine goals; the system self-reference, we realize that each
element is integrated as function and unity in conversation in join to the environment at replay
mode ever go head according with internal dynamic making reference inside on the asymmetric
realization; this refer to fact in as the system function independence of the occur outside; the
principal asymmetric is recovery all the energy that its elements, the extra-help come to from of
the universal time, as an individual reflection in always go according with the social order. 99It`s
like watching, some boulevard on the city; all the cars have only one direction and it`s regularized
for transit signal; the drivers must go to specific goals and the pedestrians must to respect the
transit regulation for save the life and arrived to save.

As do we know the system exist100 for this to bring examples from the real life on the society, each
observation takes particular form at the explain moments; the connection with timing, interval,
temporary and time its real is not a subjective creation or theology conception; the manner in as
we count our life at to see the sky, clock, calendars, birthdays, age etc. It’s so real and concrete in
our relations as social system in particular the culture to bring, specific traditions that deposited
inside on the consciousness without permission; the coaction, coercion, education, behavior it’s
are some concrete examples, the fact in as to see the time is not the individual decision everyone

99
Own idea.
100
See: The general Theory of Systems; Luhmann N.
is according with social time, up to the biological clock; we haves specific times for determine
task.

Now we centralized in specific consequences of the time, as all inside on the system in movement
and therefore is dynamic (not everything remains as it is) in transformation among; system,
environment its complexity as a product specific in self-reference; the time is according with the
movement for highlight the real importance on the temporized function; and this represent the
choice in set on the possibility for take the coaction selection (individual) on progress in join to
the complexity, this process has implication with time.

The set-in function to bring inside the transformation among, relations and structure but that we
know as irreversible “social construction” as structure is only a fact on the society, perhaps the
time is a <the possibility of return or reconstruction does not contradict time, but overcomes an
irreversible process of time between>101 the social progress is a exactly point inside on the system,
and this create the interval for count the orientation, the irreversible and reversible is a kind of
continuum between the space and time.

When the time take the orientation, the society renounce the environment through of a total
synchronization according with internal elements; this movement inside content the principle on
the orientation, must to call: entropy its denominate as communication between elements on the
individual sense inside on the action framework but as understand the action, according to situation
in considerer the individual as actor and their will find to satisfice some necessity for lives on the
temporary system102. As individual and actor have once different in respond to the environment,
in our theory founded that an individual is considered as a unique solution in themselves and actor
is considered with respect to action103; this movement according to organization in each situation.
That’s clear the different; orientation take sense as motivation for reach the specific goals, the
motivation component is collective action as organized system; when to talk about the interest or
goals as actor, the motivation functional to away orientation at toward objects in obtain the
gratification that corresponded to each actor.

101
Luhmann N, the time as movement.
102
To call: temporal system.
103
Individual realized action with benefits.
Exist two kinds of objects according to action theory104, must to be no social objects (physics
objects) and social objects the last corresponding to individual and collective (personality
individual and collective), on the perception physical of objects works as: environment the natural
position on the world which is perpetuum passive position and change if the actor take the action
in against of them. In appearance the world around to us seem that, don’t moves but to contrary
change and the time take control of this situation as recollecting information for survive on the
world, the objects take form according to awareness in there depends of knowledge type.

As to know the actor tried to selection according the information and them the specific necessity,
and this produced for the same system, but selection is an item for the specific relations into such
objects (social and physical) and here produces the effective effect in orientation. We have the
time as an orientation sense on the social life; and specific reproduction of plurality organization
in such orientation on the implication choose and selection, remember depends of system in respect
to society or context; this advice corresponds to cognitive aspect on the consciousness between
objects and gratification.

If the time correspond as orientation, could take a form minimalistic and reduce all to signals or
symbols but to occurred the temporary or timing following the original drama in considered as a
phenomenon outside from us; the perfect example is when the people walking in any place, their
orientation correspond inside the behavior in the relations with context, the symbols and signals
depends of knowledge because is as we to understand the social universe it’s a keys into the mind
for realized the daily life without move away its property knowledge. You can see the time as a
new complex-social universe in this form to understand that producing for us, is not imagination
on the action understanding as collective figure, the social universe lost the emblematic characters
of unknow or impossible. As well as the common sense is produce into social consciousness, the
time take from our senses and formulate the specific characteristics on the real life or else more
society, the time is real but not rea in concrete the pretention on the timing is not count, unlike
generate the specific difference inside to the systems; this production constant of principal ideas
in concrete that product the social universe the symbols; the orientation is to know as symbolic
systematic inside on the human mind just the social groups can to form the social orientation.

104
See: Action Theory and definitions of physical and social objects.
Perhaps now to try the orientation as a distinction between: distribution, selection, taste and
distinguish. In the description of the action orientation a specific system it’s description of the
property status in once moment. This to refer that if can to knowing the orientation inside content
some aspects which is according to framework and them the moment represent the exactly point
on the time, this is a situation corresponding the society is its coordination, the distribution is the
different level in that the element can at obtain the access to the system and taste to try is the most
advanced selection in join to the opportunity in as to create for the property system benefit.

The most unique is count the elements in a determined space which, can to access to specific time
for regulate the activities but this have once moment for work to call: the personality, each element
former the characteristics in join to specific relations with environment on the understand the
dynamic in which the actors walk into the social direction; for this the people believe and their
unique stereotype according the position on the spectrum as the personality. The action of any
determined actor and motivational process its concomitant in convert an integral differently
system105.

As actor its orientation is determined with specific social system in which take the form of coercion
into the progress made to measure, the element choose and received new information according
the system; it’s like watching inside on the tornado around all change. The training to bring some
plurality in common situation all this have to limit on depends the cultural information; now the
social system to moves inside to the actors for former the traditional category in which, can to
knowing the exterior call: social system and take the orientation for property benefit; the cultural
have specific means witch respect in join to action and therefore on the orientation. The description
action system uses category of motivational orientation as to be: cognition (capacity to know) and
evaluation (this refer to selection). It’s really important to understand that inside to time bring in
themselves some’s cultural guidelines as: ideas or beliefs (cognitive interest) , symbolic expression
(artistic styles) and values orientation (consequences and implication for an action system); the
last is chord the specific situation for the social groups, the evaluation on the consequences is the
denominated the rational progress, inside the society in define the progress as community of
knowledge at towards the majority in this case the specific social group.

105
According with Parsons, the action is motivational but in join to Luhmann this process required time and
selection.
On the culture, we will to take the topic about of behavior but as some necessities of organization;
cognitive orientation in cotectic on organization of action106. We to know the organism have into
the direction on objects (social and physical) for satisficed our necessity and impulses; when to
explain the behavior, must to take in our definition that all this with respect necessities depends in
specify social group. The society take the principal components in join to socialization for our
integration as, internal and external; into the internal the responsible to tried according the
biological components or necessities, I talk about as: eat, sleep or sanitary; and this just the
individual entanglement to call: capacity for synthesis, all our organism to respond at the exterior
content, over here take the another form; how our biological components is according with
exterior? It is basic solution for our responsibility and them to resolved the daily life, our passion
and individual position is regulated from the exterior levels, each part in our body need of natural
components that is on the environment, for what? I took one example at the time for eat on the
medium day, your body has routine according the pleasures which is learning in join to
socialization process (times for: eat, sleep, school) all this called: life. Well the individual benefits
correspond to specific interaction on the social life, the institution which is founded for the lasts
generation on the exactly point on the time (dates) in our presents to give social services, all around
of individual being is predetermined the people to call: system, maybe to: States, Governments
and Political Solutions.

In this manner the people realized relations with systems which, to take time for the decision
according the individual goals but what happened with environment? The person or individual
subject to need social explanation for live according the principal laws, norms or rules,
environment to refer to unknow; the individual grown with respect to access at the social
knowledge but depends the biological capacity (grown of ages), in into the socialization each level
has definite according this capacity. The environment changes inside on the time, the individual
too; you know all this components from daily life it makes easy to think and realized “normal
situation” in as we to take specific forms in join to behavior in our century, period or years, etc.
At the moment the time, took this normality as measure and divide each period of our social time,
to believe that the time, is just numeric, interval, measure, etc. It is part in our socialization process
in this period on the civilization.

106
Catectar is same to take or get it on physical spaces.
In catectar to take the particular objects or passwords for attribution on means but for obtain
gratification in join to activity, which can to be direct or private. On the physic world the individual
need the connection of which to generate advanced in time for better life; this form concrete to
refer in as the material objects integrated the individual life is kind of exchange among, exterior
and interior process in this interaction the individual corresponds to according the personal
instincts, but at the same time, the personality is regulated for social life. The exchange emerged
to specific knowledge in as; the land of objects, when the individual actor knows to the relations
among to him and this property necessities, to can organized the behavior with reference to
discrimination, if the universe contain to a lot objects, the individual to can knows all about this
without forget that in more possibilities required different process in join to the society in which
the concepts take the specific forms.

The discrimination is reference to orientation system, jus that to understand in a kind of put values
for entire socialization; the actor selection (this position is an imposition from culturally) depend
of the level into the gratification, the words gratification, only take value if is accept to culturally.
Now the probability on the conception of time, take the same way; some author corresponds to
individual decision as rational choice but in our schemes the rational possibilities is secondary
because, we to talk of individuum and society as a dialogue without obvious, that society change
if the individual positions take, other concepts inside on the property imagen, some concepts tried
the real explanation. The last about to get some awards, is to find on the functional behavior but
as we to seems the society is a consignee for to find the expectation and evaluation to away the
individual person to grown in medium to disasters or mess; the gratification is connection among
to evaluate according with goals.

The learning is development of frameworks reference into the action as a function on the
orientation (relation internal and exterior) with objects universe. All this is connection on the time,
timing or interval sequences for individual capacities in mode to define the orientation of the actor
to towards particular objects which to don’t have experience.
 References

Berguer, Peter; Luckman Thomas. The Social Construction of Reality. Edi, Amorrortu.2002

Bauman, Zygmunt. The Individualized Society. Edi, Free Culture.2001

Elias, Norbert. Die Gesellschaft der Individuen, 62. Edi., Barcelona, Limprergraf.1990

Elias, Norbert. Die Hofische Gesellschaft. Edi. Frankfurt, Lier. 1963

Elias, Norbert. The Symbol Theory. Edi. Barcelona, Limprergraf.1994

Elias, Norbert. Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation. Edi. Sozialphilosophie.1939

Elias, Norbert. Uber die Zeit. Edi. Indubuiliding. 1984.

Elias, Norbert. Engagement und Distanzierung. Edi. 62/A, Barcelona.1990

Elias, Norbert. Was ist Soziologie. Edi. Juventa Verag Munchen.1970

Latour, Bruno. “An Introduction to Actor Network”. Edi. Oxford University Press.2005

Luhmann, Niklas. Soziale Systeme. Edi, Iberoamericana.1998

Parsons, Talcott. The Social System. Edi, Cambridge.1974

Parsons, Talcott. The Action Theory. Edi, Paidos, Barcelona.1978

Parsons, Talcott. The Structure of Social Action I. Edi, Guadarrama, Madrid.1968

Sewell, William. Toward a Sociology of Event. Edi. University of Chicago.1990

Vattimo, Gianni. The Transparent Society. Edi, Universidad de Barcelona, Paidos.1989