Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
: ____
VOCABULARY BANK
English word Japanese meaning English word Japanese meaning
assimilate
naturalization
deportation
quota
quarantine
ethnocentrism
isolationism
homogeneity
heterogeneity
persecution
monotheism
exclusivism
VOCABULARY PRACTICE
Write 5 sentences using these words (you can use more than 1 in a sentence).
1. ________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. ________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. ________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
4. ________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
5. ________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
CCU – 02 IMMIGRATION Name: ________________________ Class: ____ No.: ____
WARMUP DISCUSSIONS
Discuss these 5 questions in small groups. You will rotate after each question. First, fill in Your Ideas. Next,
record your Partners’ Ideas.
Why do people leave their homelands
What issues might someone think about
and move to new areas? before deciding to emigrate/immigrate?
What challenges do immigrants face
What makes immigration easier for some
in their new homes? and harder for others?
What would cause you to emigrate from Japan? Where would you go? What challenges do
you think you would have in a new land?
Write your idea. After writing, please write the word count and time spent writing (EX: 80 words/10 minutes)
Immigration
CCU – 02 IMMIGRATION VIDEO DISCUSSION
What do you think about the idea that people should “bloom where they are planted”?
Q1
Do you agree with the narrator’s perspective on “white genocide”? Does that concept apply to Japan?
Q2
How does the data / timeline about population change your perspective about immigration?
Q3
Critical Thinking
TOPIC: What do you think about immigration in Japan?
In the T-chart below, write 5 positive things and 5 negative things about opening up Japan to more immigration
POSITIVE/GOOD POINTS NEGATIVE/BAD POINTS
CCU – 02 IMMIGRATION READING 1: 20 MIN
Among the more eloquent spokesmen for that ideal is Hidenori Sakanaka, former director of the Tokyo
Immigration Bureau and current executive director of the Japan Immigration Policy Institute, which he
founded in 2005. Why not, he has been saying since then, welcome 10 million immigrants to Japan by
2050?
It’s a hard sell. Japan hypes its warmhearted omotenashi (hospitality) toward foreign visitors. Foreign
residents are another matter. No Japanese government has ever been voted out of office for strictly
limiting their numbers.. For Sakanaka it’s a question of national survival. One possible interpretation of
figures released earlier this month by the government’s National Institute of Population and Social
Security Research is that Japan is dying of demographic anemia.
Few nations die natural deaths. But how far can depopulation go before the vital forces wane
irrecoverably? Japan over the next half-century, says the National Institute, will lose on average 780,000
people a year. It estimates a population in 2065 of 88.08 million — down from 127 million in 2015 and
128 million in 2008, the year it peaked. Sakanaka fears “a future of despair” — “villages dying one by
one,” ancient traditions along with them.
A more immediate problem is managing the nation’s rapid aging. People aged 65 and over are expected
to comprise 38.4 percent of the total population in 2065, up from 26.6 percent in 2015 and 10 percent in
1990. Who will care for them? Who will generate the productivity, the cultural vitality, the children, that a
living society needs? Immigrants, says Sakanaka.
He swims against the current. Geographically isolated from birth, politically isolated from the early 17th
to the mid-19th centuries by a rigidly enforced exclusion policy aptly named sakoku (closed country),
psychologically isolated even today by a racial and cultural homogeneity that many consider worth
preserving, Japan has been the despair of international bodies struggling to find homes for a swelling
global tide of refugees.
Sakanaka acknowledges this. He emphasizes it, writing of Japan’s “1,000 years of sakoku.” He
acknowledges, too, that the Western nations once held up to Japan as models of generous
accommodation of immigrants are now turning inward, erecting sakoku walls of their own. Terrorism
counts for much in this, as does fear of native cultures being swamped by foreign cultures, native labor
markets by foreign labor, native freedom by foreign anti-freedom, native tolerance by foreign intolerance,
native law and order by foreign crime and disorder, and so on.
Can this trend be bucked — by the very nation that has embodied it for “1,000 years”? Not easily, and
yet: “Ten years ago, when I proposed that the country be open to immigration,” Sakanaka writes in
Shukan Kinyobi, “those who agreed with me numbered roughly zero. But in April 2015 an Asahi Shimbun
poll showed more than half of respondents to be pro-immigration. The atmosphere with regard to
immigration has changed dramatically.”
CCU – 02 IMMIGRATION READING 1: 20 MIN
Not really, counters Tokyo Metropolitan University professor Kiyoto Tanno. “I think, the current
environment being what it is,” he argues in a separate Shukan Kinyobi piece, “that immigrants are best
advised not to come here.” Circumstances are such, he says, “if they do come, they won’t be happy.”
That is unfortunate, in his view, because Tanno, like Sakanaka, believes Japan would be the better for a
foreign infusion. He doubts it’s equipped to receive one, however. He sees the foreign workers here —
numbering 1.08 million as of October 2016 — being treated more as commodities than as human beings.
Legal restrictions of their length of stay and occupational mobility constitute, in effect, a cynical invitation
to meet Japan’s temporary labor needs and then go home. The U.S. and the EU, he says, are more
flexible in that regard.
True, says Sakanaka — but present shortcomings need not thwart future improvements. It’s his institute’s
mission to design and promote them, and the key one seems to be: “All immigrants to be treated the
same as Japanese.” Equal opportunity, equal working conditions, equal freedom, equal pay for equal
work, equal taxation, equal pensions, equal access to social welfare.
The dominant language would, of course, be Japanese, which immigrants would have to learn —
preferably, to some extent, before coming, which would require more and better language instruction in
the home countries. But culturally, diversity would reign. Out with homogeneity.
Would cultures clash? Creatively, yes; antagonistically, no. “People of different cultures, religions, faces,”
he writes, “would come together — all of them Japanese, all of them stimulating one another.”
Why shouldn’t it happen? It should, but it rarely seems to. Sakanaka admits as much. In the U.S., cradle of
“freedom”; in France, whose revolution enthroned “liberty, equality and fraternity”; in the West as a
whole, “anti-Islamism and racial discrimination are poisoning European culture.”
Sakanaka suggests reasons. Europe generated ideals but Christian monotheism — “only my religion is
right, all others are wrong” — hindered their flowering. The U.S., historically “an immigration society,”
was built partly on slavery. Japan has its faults, but religious exclusivism and mass enslavement are not
among them. A less tainted past can, Sakanaka hopes, make for a more humane future.
Is this visionary, or practical? Or both? The current microcosm of a future multicultural Japan might be
Tokyo’s Shin-Okubo district, whose large (by Japanese standards) immigrant population includes Koreans,
Taiwanese, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis and Indians. Other neighborhoods harbor other communities —
Chinese in Ikebukuro, Burmese in Takadanobaba. Journalist Keiichi Kanda, reporting for Shukan Kinyobi,
discerns among ordinary Japanese little repugnance but not much cordiality either — more a cautious, or
shy, holding aloof, their feelings hovering, perhaps, between Sakanaka’s brotherhood and the grim
alternative emerging elsewhere: the poisoned melting pot.
Michael Hoffman is the author of “In the Land of the Kami: A Journey into the Hearts of Japan” and “Other Worlds.”
Do you agree or disagree? (Discuss with your partners) What does “if they do come, they won’t be happy” mean?
Immigration
CCU – 02 IMMIGRATION Research Project
Project Overview
Pick a research question from the set below and investigate it with your partners. You will present
your findings to the entire class and participate in a group discussion about these issues.
Research Questions
• Do immigrants cause more crime?
Step 1 - Define what information you need to understand and answer your
question?
Identify data/evidence (both Japanese and international) needed to
give a reliable, detailed response to your group’s question.
2"Today's Immigration Policy Debates: Do We Need a Little History ...." 1 Nov. 2006, http://
www.migrationpolicy.org/article/todays-immigration-policy-debates-do-we-need-little-history. Accessed 9 May.
2017.
5"Push and Pull Factors - Association of American Geographers." 16 Mar. 2011, http://cgge.aag.org/Migration1e/
ConceptualFramework_Jan10/ConceptualFramework_Jan105.html. Accessed 9 May. 2017.
NAME:_________________________________ NUMBER: _______
The Research
Project
3i CCU - Immigration FIRST DRAFT
Should Japan open up to more immigration (increase total to 10%)?
Drafts
CCU – 02 IMMIGRATION RUBRIC
Essay Rubric
Study
Excellent Good
More
Introduction
The Introduction starts with a HOOK that successfully grabs the reader’s
5 4 2
attention
The THESIS presents a main idea and provides a clear plan for the
5 4 2
entire essay
Body
Conclusion
The main points are REVIEWED, either to remind the reader or suggest
3 2 1
solutions
The conclusion ends memorably with a TAKEAWAY or COMMENT for
3 2 1
the reader
Target
Expression
Grammar 20 15 10
Coherency 15 10 5
Score:
100
CCU – 02 IMMIGRATION USEFUL VOCABULARY
PLEASE CHECK THE JAPANESE MEANING IF YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND
Discourse Markers (つなぎ言葉)
Addition, Similarity
Illustrations, Examples
Contrast, Conflict
Summarizing, Concluding
Direction
Time
*words marked with an * should generally NOT be used to start sentences. Please check for the correct usage first.