Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ties to their communities and profession. These are issues that become increasingly
crucial to the settlement houses in subsequent decades. My current research deals in part
with these questions. In addition, I would like to second Scimecca’s suggestion that
sociologists (and also social workers) become involved in using the tremendous amount
of documentary evidence on settlement houses in public archives. The varying perspec-
tives are bound to add much depth to our knowledge of this unique special institution.
Dorothy F. Zeligs. Psychoanalysis and the Bible: A Study in Depth of Seven Leaders.
New York: Bloch, 1974. pp. xxiv + 348, $10.00. (Reviewed by L. D. HANKOFF)
As the subtitle of the volume indicates, the author has undertaken a personality
study of seven Old Testament characters - Abraham, Jacob, Joseph, Samuel, Saul,
David, and Solomon - using the standard biblical text supplemented by a considerable
available folklore as the basis for her application of psychoanalytic thinking to the sub-
ject. She has, in effect, provided us with seven psychoanalytic biographical studies in
miniature, approaching the biblical material with respect and a background of interest in
biblical matters which goes beyond a mere application of her profession to the topic. Dr.
Zeligs, a psychologist with training in psychoanalysis, has written the book in lucid and
simple terms with the interested layman in mind. This is evident in her inclusion of a
glossary of psychoanalytic terms and the lack of technical referencing with regard to
modern biblical scholarship.
Zeligs offers many interesting formulations concerning the unconscious strivings of
her seven characters and possible explanations for some of the puzzling events in the Bi-
ble. We are told in a brief forward by Dr. Joost A. M. Meerloo that the present form of
applied psychoanalysis is comparable to the approach of good exegesis generally. This
raises some general issues with regard to Zeligs’ techniques of applied psychoanalysis.
The issue of the context of the psychoanalytic focus is perhaps the most basic con-
cern. The author has chosen to use mainly the biblical account of the character as a basis
for a psychoanalytic formulation. This is bound to introduce distortions if the assump-
tion of the researcher is at variance with the intention of the biblical writer. For what pur-
pose was the Bible written and is it suitable for psychoanalytic study as biographical
material? The author often uses the scriptural text as if it were an analysand’s free
association, interpreting portions as indicating psychodynamic relationships in the
character’s unconscious. For example, she refers to an apparent unclear and faltering
passage about King David in the Book of Samuel as possible evidence of David’s
“resistance” to dealing with sensitive material (p. 212). I believe it is an error to consider
the Bible’s narrative as in any way comparable to modern biography. The Old Testament
gives an account of the relationship of a people to God and any biographical details
which have been included are incidental to that task.
The present psychoanalytic study of the historical character is prone to the error of
ignoring the context because of the nature of the psychoanalytic study process. The psy-
choanalytic method is of value clinically in looking at the individual in terms of in-
dividual defenses, coping mechanisms, and motivating forces. There is an emphasis by
the psychoanalyst on universal symbols and the interpretation of behavior in terms of in-
dividual psychology. The broader context is not always in sharp focus. Thus we find our
BOOK REVIEWS 93
The distinction between group and individual psychology may also be of importance
in the psychoanalytic study of history. The history of a people obviously cannot be
viewed as the simple extension of the history of an individual. Unfortunately, Zeligs has
slipped into this error and offers the interpretation that the Old Testament is the expres-
sion of a working through of the oedipal struggle over many generations of Hebrews:
“The text of the Bible. . . is a remarkable expression of the development of the superego,
outgrowth of the oedipal conflict, portrayed as a group drama, with its leaders as the
representative actors” (p. 3 11-3 12). She supports this contention with the argument that
psychoanalytic investigation of the (biblical) text has been surprisingly limited because
psychoanalytic inquiry represents looking at the father critically, a forbidden form of
voyeurism (p. 314). Her contention is refuted by the simple fact that biblical studies by
psychoanalysts are not rare and their willingness to look at the Bible suffers no
voyeuristic constraints.
Dr. Zeligs’ mature appreciation of the Old Testament is evident in this work, but I
believe that it contains a misapplication of the psychoanalytic method. There is little to
be achieved in attempting a character analysis based on highly incomplete information.
The author is often forced to pile conjecture on conjecture in the effort. This is not to say
that psychoanalysis cannot make important contributions to the understanding of an-
cient literature and ancient man. I believe that psychoanalytic theory can have con-
siderable value in the ongoing effort to grasp the nature of the cognitive processes and
belief systems of ancient man. Psychoanalysis could be well applied along with other dis-
ciplines, such as comparative developmental psychology (in the broad sense used by
Heinz Werner), cognitive anthropology, and ethnopsychiatry, which have been directed
at the problem of the ancient mind.
with much of recent scholarship which has taken a more humanistic and unified ap-
proach to the Bible than was evident in the biblical exegesis of the last two centuries or
so. My presentation offers a psychoanalytic confirmation of what was previously largely
intuitive and makes even more impressive, as I see it, the remarkable qualities of this
literature.
BOOK REVIEWERS
L. D. HANKOFF [Review of Zeligs, Psychoanalysis and the Bible, JHBS 15 (1979):
92-95] is Professor of Psychiatry at the New York Medical College and Chairman of
Psychiatry at Misericordia and Fordham Hospitals, Bronx, New York. He previously
directed and developed programs in psychiatry at Queens Hospital Center, Brooklyn,
New York. He is the author of Emergency Psychiatric Treatment: The Handbook of
Secondary Prevention.