0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
9 visualizzazioni2 pagine
This rubric evaluates questions groups on a scale of 0 to 4 in three criteria: claim and support, development, and conventions. For each criterion, it provides descriptions of expectations at each level to guide scoring, focusing on elements like establishing a clear claim, citing relevant evidence, explaining connections between evidence and claims, and using appropriate language and tone.
This rubric evaluates questions groups on a scale of 0 to 4 in three criteria: claim and support, development, and conventions. For each criterion, it provides descriptions of expectations at each level to guide scoring, focusing on elements like establishing a clear claim, citing relevant evidence, explaining connections between evidence and claims, and using appropriate language and tone.
This rubric evaluates questions groups on a scale of 0 to 4 in three criteria: claim and support, development, and conventions. For each criterion, it provides descriptions of expectations at each level to guide scoring, focusing on elements like establishing a clear claim, citing relevant evidence, explaining connections between evidence and claims, and using appropriate language and tone.
Expectations Expectations Expectations Expectations Claim & No claim present Attempts to establish a Establishes a claim to Establishes a clear and Establishes a credible or evidence claim that is unclear or answer each question plausible claim to and convincing claim Support present disconnected from the that needs more answer each question. to answer each topic; or does not answer development. Refers Cites mostly strong question. Cites each question. Includes to some evidence from evidence that supports sufficient and relevant almost no evidence from the text that loosely or the claim. evidence to fully the text; evidence is based vaguely supports the support the claim. on personal experience or claim. unconnected sources. Development No development Attempts to explain some Explains the Clearly explains the Analyzes the relevance present connections between connection between connections between and strength of the evidence and claim in an some evidence and the the selected evidence evidence in supporting unclear or disconnected claim; some and the claim. the claim. way. explanations revolve around personal feelings rather than analysis. Conventions Writing is Attempts to use some Demonstrates some Demonstrates a Demonstrates a strong incomprehensible. English conventions, though command of English working command of command of English errors frequently inhibit conventions with some English conventions conventions with few, reader’s comprehension. errors that inhibit with some errors that minor errors. Uses Uses informal language and reader’s do not inhibit reader’s language and tone that tone. comprehension. Uses comprehension. Uses are appropriate to language and tone language and tone that audience and purpose. that are inconsistently are academic. academic or inconsistently appropriate for audience and purpose.