Sei sulla pagina 1di 3

SOLUTION EVIDENCE: BLOG “WHAT YOU WOULDN’T RECOMMEND”

Da Vinci Codes
Writer: Dan Brown
Reviews: Amelia Quintero
My reviews will be about a book, this book called Da Vinci Codes, the which
was written by Dan Brown y published in 2003 by Random House, the reasons
for write about this book famous, are various:

First: The writer his taken various histories old-out-date without testing.

Second: Dan Brown mixed the science, the religion and politics in one only
place, in the book

Third: He wanted changed the history of the Catholics religion.

And by end, the writer let us written in the book the idea of existence of
inheritors of Jesus Christ in the earth.

The history started in Paris city in the Louvre museum, the curator Jacques
Saunière appearsed dead with write ancient in your body, symbols very ancient,
the symbologist Robert Langdon which known very well the symbols and was
friend of the Jacques Saunière curator of the museum, Robert is guilty
according the police of Paris and He is invited to the museum for see the body
de Jacques and read the symbols in the body de Jacques.

The granddaughter of Saunière received to Langdon in the museum and they


got where were body of Sauniere, She said to Langdon, the police erased the
letters write in the floor, where said the Name of Langdon and your Telephone,
so, the Police thinked in the culpability of Langdon, here started the best part
of the book, when Sophie the granddaughter of Sauniere helped to scape to
Langdon.

Sauniere the curator of the museum it left to Langdon several track, about your
death, the which they started to investigation, are persecuted by Police and
Opus Dei, the Police by the murder of Sarniere y el Opus Dei for hide the legend
about the inheritors of Jesus Christ, Sophie and Langdon got to tracks hidden in
the streets of Paris of the time of Da Vince, Newton and others men of Science,
they belonged to sects secret in his time.

The argument of keeping the heirs of Jesus hidden for almost 2000 years in
order to preserve a correct theological interpretation of Jesus as the incarnation
of God and the second person of the Holy Trinity, is described by Cortes as
"extravagant, to put it mildly ».

The union of Jesus and Mary Magdalene is not verified in any way in the
Scriptures. The forcing of apocryphal writings - as it appears in the film - to say
what they say in any way is a biased way of interpreting those materials that
defies common sense.

The idea that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene and that union produced
a daughter, who in turn kept the lines of divine and real blood of Jesus alive for
2000 years despite a massive ecclesiastical plot to destroy that "theological
bomb" It can be "exciting for some" and can contribute to "good theater" but
not to a rigorous biblical analysis.

Additionally, the time between Jesus and our days represents a minimum of 60
generations. Even if the union of Jesus and Mary Magdalene, which is not
verified in any way in the Bible, would have resulted in an heir that was
presumably half divine, by the time the line had crossed 10 generations, the
"divine blood" (that is, its gene contribution) would not be greater than 1 /
2,032; in generation 25 it would and in generation 60 it would represent an
infinitesimal contribution.

The idea that, after 60 generations, that bloodline resided in a woman of the
21st century and not in hundreds of thousands of heirs, is obviously absurd
unless in each generation the progeny that gave rise to the new surviving
generation was of a person, which would be quite difficult to accept.

Let it be speculated that the bearer of the divine blood "cannot walk on water,"
but "hopes to make the conversion of water into wine better" refers to a literal
interpretation of the Bible. It is assumed that these two biblical images of Jesus
are the result of a literal interpretation of the New Testament, which has
already been neglected by many contemporary scholars.

In resume, much stories of sects secrect, men of science was made symbols for
communicate with others, the templar and the church, the belief of the wife of
the Jesus Christ and his decendents, to tip of symbols and histories, Sophie and
Langdon end where it was the body of Maria Magdalena, we remained the idea,
Sophie is the decendents of Jesus Christ.

Potrebbero piacerti anche