PROJECT

LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT)

Rev. Issued ISSUED for INFORMATION Made

date Description by
- -
Vansya Pratama Lubis, ST

Cheked
by

Edwin Romel

Contractor:

Client: Contract No.:

Project no: Project title:

TENSILE MEMBRANE STRUCTURE
Document type: Platform(s): Area(s): System(s): Tag(s):

Document title:

STRUCTURE CALCULATION REPORT

Document no.: Rev.: Page:

00 1 of 38
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 2 of 38

REVISIONS

----- None ----

PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 3 of 38

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 DESIGN LIMITATION

3.0 REFERENCES

4.0 METHOD OF ANALYSIS

4.1 BASIC LOAD CASES

4.2 LOAD COMBINATION

5.0 ANALYSIS RESULT

5.1 STABILITY
5.2 STRENGTH CHECK
5.3 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

APPENDICES
APPENDIX A Structural Model
APPENDIX B Load Summation
APPENDIX C Support Reaction
APPENDIX D Check Ratio
APPENDIX E Conclusion
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 4 of 38

1. INTRODUCTION

This report is provided as a brief summary of the design of structural space framing
calculations,made to support the roof of the roof membrane of the “LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
(LRT)”, Indonesia. The roof consists of a series of elongated pulls membrane with a barrel
roof shape. Support for all structures is formed by a frame truss in each series of roof
membranes. The frame structure of the roof membrane is a series of curved steel structures
supported by the edge of the column with the column distance to the column includes
dimensions 3.4 m.

The basic illustration of the roof membrane is as follows:

PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 5 of 38

2. DESIGN LIMITATION

The structural analysis and design provided in this report only covers the brief analysis that
ensures the support space frame (framing and column truss) adequacy in withstanding the
roof against the live-load and wind load. The tensile membrane itself and or the structural
basement building check beneath the column truss support are not covered.

The analysis constitutes a static analysis only (in-place condition), while seismic is excluded
as it has insignificant impact compared to the wind. Any induced load unless what has been
described in the analysis, are not to be taken into account and hence any failure against
them are outside of the scope.

3. REFERENCES

1. Peraturan Pembebanan Indonesia Untuk Gedung 1987.

2. Standar Nasional Indonesia 1727:2013.

.
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 6 of 38

4. METHOD OF ANALYSIS

The calculation is generated using StaadPro structural program that models the 3 (three)
dimensional structural framing for support frame, column truss, slings and the Finite Element
Model (FEM) for the roof membrane. The use of roof membrane FEM model is limited only
for gaining the ‘more correct’ load distribution while the membrane stiffness contribution to
the entire analysis process is neglected..

The analysis considers the load of: self-weight of the support frame, self-weight of the
membrane of 750 g/m2 (with allowing some miscellaneous component), live-load of 20 kg/m2
(PPIUG’83) and the wind speed of 25 Kg/m2 (PPIUG’83). The wind speed envisaged herein
constitutes a reduce one due to the building blockage around the ‘roof membrane farm’ area.

1.1 BASIC LOAD CASE

Load case 1: Membrane self-weight 750 g/m2

Load case 2: Live load 20 kg/m2
Load case 3: Support frame self-weight
Load case 4: Wind load 25 Kg/m2
Load case 5: Initial pre-stress

Pre-stress Membrane :
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 7 of 38

The prestress membrane is derived from separate membrane finite element analysis (using
M-Panel program) with the provision as outlined beforehand. The result of tensile load is as
follows:

Tensile load at the tent perimeter

VELODROME TYPE A

VELODROME TYPE B
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 8 of 38

1.2 LOAD COMBINATION

Load combination divided into two conditions, i.e: for Stability check so called as ASD
(Allowable Stress Design) group.

Load combination:

METHOD ASD Dead Load Live Load Wind Load X

(Allowable Stress Design) (DL) (LL) (WL)
LOAD COMBINATION FOR FOUNDATION PLANNING
Load Combination 1 1.40 - -
Load Combination 2 1.20 1.60 -
Load Combination 3 1.20 1.00 1.00
Load Combination 4 0.90 - 1.00
LOAD COMBINATION FOR CHECK RATIO
Load Combination 5 1.00 - -
Load Combination 6 1.00 1.00 -
Load Combination 7 1.00 0.75 -
Load Combination 8 1.00 - 0.60
Load Combination 9 1.00 0.75 0.75.(0.60)
Load Combination 10 0.60 - 0.60

2. ANALYSIS RESULTS

2.1 STABILITY

The stability check constitutes the displacement check due to the ASD load combination
group. It is found that the deflection of the support frame is within the considered limit. See
Appendix C. Thus the structure is concluded to be firmly stable.

2.2 STRENGTH CHECK

Based on the result of UC check, all structural support frame is found satisfactory (<1.0). See
Appendix D. The maximum UC is 0.469 for Column.

4.1 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

From the result of stability and strength adequacy above, therefore it is concluded that the
support structure framing is satisfactory to withstand the assumed load and load combination
described in Section 4.0. It is recommended to control the load application specifically the
initial pre-stressed for not exceeding the limit used in the analysis.
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 9 of 38

APPENDICES
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 10 of 38

APPENDIX A.1
STRUCTURAL MODEL
(VELEDROME TYPE A)
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 11 of 38
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 12 of 38

Pipe dia 2.5in Medium

Pipe dia 3in Medium

 PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 13 of 38

Pipe dia 6in Medium

Pipe dia 267.4 mm , thickness 6.0 mm

Pipe dia 165.1 mm , thickness 5.0 mm

PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 14 of 38

APPENDIX A.2
STRUCTURAL MODEL
(VELEDROME TYPE B)
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 15 of 38
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 16 of 38

Pipe dia 2.5in Medium

Pipe dia 3in Medium

PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 17 of 38

Pipe dia 6in Medium

PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 18 of 38

LOAD ON STRUCTURE
(VELODROME TYPE A)

DEAD LOAD

LIVE LOAD
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 19 of 38

WIND LOAD
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 20 of 38

DEAD LOAD (PRE STRESS)

PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 21 of 38

LOAD ON STRUCTURE
(VELODROME TYPE B)
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 22 of 38

DEAD LOAD

LIVE LOAD
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 23 of 38

WIND LOAD

DEAD LOAD (PRE STRESS)

APPENDIX B
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 24 of 38

LOAD SUMMATION
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 25 of 38
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 27 of 38
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 28 of 38

APPENDIX C.2
SUPPORT REACTION
(VELODROME TYPE B)
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 29 of 38
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 30 of 38

APPENDIX D.1
CHECK RATIO
(VELODROME TYPE A)
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 31 of 38
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 32 of 38

APPENDIX D.1
CHECK RATIO
(VELODROME TYPE B)
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 33 of 38

APPENDIX E
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 34 of 38

CONCLUSION
 SPECIFICATION ANGKUR CHEMICAL

PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT

Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 35 of 38
SPECIFICATON ANGKUR CHEMICAL

Recommendation Angkur Chemical :

OUTPUT :
PROJECT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Structural Design Calculation Report Rev. : 00 Page : 36 of 38

a. Fu(tensile) maximum : 3041.550 Kg

b. Fu(shear) maximum : 378.484 Kg

Based On Calculation :
1. Anchor using M12, effective anchor depth L=110mm.
1 anchor = 20.4 kN (Tensile) = 2.0802 Ton = 2080.2 Kg
1 anchor = 12.6 kN (Shear) = 1.2848 Ton = 1284.8 Kg
For one column using 4 Anchor Chemical
4 anchor = 4 x 2080.2 Kg = 8320.8 Kg > 3041.550 Kg (Fu Tensile).
4 anchor = 4 x 1284.8 Kg = 5139.2 Kg > 378.484 Kg (Fu Shear).
2. Baseplate thickness t=15mm is still acceptable.