Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
The Research Proposal itself should be presented in sufficient detail for the supervisor(s) and Head of
Department/School to be able to comment on its suitability. It should include a realistic planned timetable including
deadlines, a list of objectives, description of methods to be used, and it should provide details of any special supervisory
arrangements (e.g., provision of alternative supervision in the case of a supervisor taking study leave; arrangements
for meetings with external supervisors). There should be statements about who has been consulted about the project,
including general staff whose assistance may be required in the course of the work.
If the research is dependent on the approval of the University's Human Ethics Committee or Animal Ethics Committee,
or any other committee or organisation, the approval should normally have been obtained prior to registration of the
proposals. Aspects of the research which require approval from an Ethics Committee shall not proceed until the
approval has been acquired.
Please complete the form and return to the Departmental Administrator by email attachment.
We strongly advise students and supervisors to keep a copy of the form for future reference.
UC Student Number:
Email address:
Four letter code for thesis subject (i.e. GEOL. ENGE, DRRE):
Methods: Outline the methods by which you will conduct your research. The Methods should include relevant
references, figures and tables and should not exceed 500 – 1,000 words (excluding figures, tables and references).
ii. The student and supervisors will establish an agreed, and documented, timeline and schedule for work to be completed
and submitted to the supervisory team for comment.
iii. Senior Supervisors will provide feedback on written work within Choose an item. weeks of the work being
submitted.
iv. Specific meeting and feedback expectations e.g. students and supervisor(s) to provide written feedback on meeting
actions points.
Research Timeline:
Provide an outline timetable for the next 2 years, leading to completion of the thesis, and a detailed timetable
for the next twelve months, including the date for your Doctoral Confirmation Oral Presentation and
written assessment at approximately 12 months from thesis enrolment. Your plan should include clear
milestones including deadlines for reports, meetings with funding agencies, etc.
TURNITIN Thesis Checking (TURNITIN is a software package which analyses for plagerism)
Please check the TURNITIN website via Learn for updates on the information below.
All files uploaded will be submitted to the plagiarism detection service Turnitin.
Please follow these guidelines to ensure that your file is uploaded to Turnitin successfully.
You must save your assignment as one of the following file formats.
Make sure that you include the '.' and the 3 or 4 letter extension.
Open Office and Libre Office users - saving as .doc won't work with Turnitin; please save your file as Rich
Text Format (.rtf)
The student has submitted their Research Proposal to TURNITIN, and we have discussed the concept of plagiarism
and there is no significant plagiarism in the proposal
Yes ☐ No ☐
Is the students written and spoke English acceptable to complete a PhD? Yes ☐ No ☐
If no, what action will be taken?
Is the student required to complete any courses? Yes ☐ No ☐
If so, what courses?
Senior Supervisor:
Name
Affiliation:
Email Address:
Supervisory Contributions:
Co-Supervisor:
Name
Affiliation:
Email Address:
Supervisory Contributions:
Name
Affiliation:
Email Address:
Supervisory Contributions:
Name
Email Address:
Supervisory Contributions: Proposal Confirmation. External scientific advice. Independent science mediator between
student and supervisory team.
Supervisors:
☐ I support the student’s continued candidature and am happy with the arrangements as specified above
☐ I do not support the student’s continued candidature, for the reasons specified below
☐ I would like to bring the following issue(s) to the attention of the HoD/S or nominee and/or Dean of
Postgraduate Research
Departmental Health and Safety induction has been completed Yes ☐/No ☐
Yes ☐/No ☐
4 Wheel drive certification required/completed
Yes ☐/No ☐
Field Activities Plan discussed with Health & Safety Manager
Discuss your field activity requirements and field activity plan with both your supervisor and
Departmental Health & Safety Manager.
The Geological Science’s Health & Safety webpage contains all appropriate Health & Safety
documents: http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/science/schools-and-departments/geological-
sciences/health-and-safety/
Further documentation and guidelines are available from the UC Health & Safety Toolkit -
https://intranet.canterbury.ac.nz/hs/toolkit/03_risk/index.shtml
Human Resources
Activity Leader
Full Name
Work Area
Email Phone
Signature Date
Signature
Emergency Procedures
What could go wrong despite efforts to control risks? How will you manage the emergency? Consider:
prevention of further harm or injury
communication
access to emergency services
emergency equipment
Current WOF
Chains
Have all requirements for transportation
of hazardous goods been considered? Yes No N/A
See Land Transport for guidance.
Expected road conditions
Contingency plan for adverse conditions,
e.g. weather, rockfall
Catering arrangements, e.g. self-catered
No. of days extra emergency food
Do your participants have any special
Yes No N/A
requirements with regards to food or
If medical/allergy related, list in participant health list above.
medical requirements?
If yes, have these people been
Yes No N/A
appropriately catered for?
Are you carrying drinking water, purifier
or have access to it during the trip?
Please specify
Use this form for hazard assessment of short term work or activity.
Hazard Consequence If Hazard Likelihood Consequenc Risk Rating Controls Residual Risk Rating Hazard
(An actual or potential source of Not Controlled (L value) e (L x C) (i.e. Eliminate, Substitute, (The remaining level of risk Eliminated
harm, including behaviour) (i.e. Injury, Illness, Incident, (C value) Guarding, Training, after controls have been or Minimised
Property Damage, etc) Administrative, PPE) implemented) (E or M)
1. List all the known or potential hazards associated with the proposed activity.
Identify the potential consequences if the hazard(s) are not controlled.
Consider the likelihood of it occurring and the consequence rating if it did occur. Hazard Control Key:
Use the Risk Rating Matrix below to rate the hazard risk.
E = Eliminate the Hazard
Identify suitable control options for the hazard that will reduce the risk levels.
Use the Risk Rating Matrix to calculate the residual risk. M= Minimise the likelihood the hazard will cause harm
Record the residual risk rating score against the hazard.
Determine if the controls eliminate or minimise the hazard.
Rare (1) Low (1) Low (2) Low (3) Low (4) Medium (5)
Unlikely (2) Low (2) Low (4) Medium (6) Medium (8) High (10)
Moderate (3) Low (3) Medium (6) Medium (9) High (12) High (15)
Likely (4) Low (4) Medium (8) High (12) High (16) Critical (20)
Almost certain (5) Medium (5) High (10) High (15) Critical (20) Critical (25)
Risk Categories
Critical & High Risk treatment strategies to be approved by Supervisor/Manager.
Medium Risk treatment strategies to be implemented by Person in Control of
Work/Activity and any specialist support as required. Strategies to be
approved by persons with specialist knowledge or experience.
Low Risk acceptable – to be managed under normal control procedures (e.g.
planning, training, information, supervisor and review).
Risk: the chance of something happening that will impact on your work.
Residual Risk: The levels of risk remaining after all control measures have been implemented.