Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
html
Development of Satellite Mission Operations
Systems for the Operation of Small Satellites
and Additional Assets
• ECE 420 – Senior Design II at the University of New Mexico (Fall 2019)
• Course Overview:
• C1. Proposals and Project Design/Implementation
• C2. Design methodology and development of professional project oriented skills
including communication, team management, economics and engineering
ethics.
• C3. Students work in teams to implement 419 proposal. Prototypes are built and
tested to sponsor specifications, and reports made to sponsor in addition to a
Final Report and Poster Session presentation.
http://norkdd.weebly.com/ece-c2iss.html
Topic of Research & Plan
• The Purpose
• Develop an integrated software laboratory
to aid in the development, testing,
training, and operation of small satellites,
drones, and other assets.
• Highlighted Published Journal Papers
used as reference:
• Development of a Comprehensive Mission
Operations System Designed to Operate
Multiple Satellites. 25th Annual AIAA/USU
Conference on Small Satellites. 2011.
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/smallsat
/2011/all2011/62/
• COSMOS – An Innovative Nodal
Architecture for Controlling Large
Numbers of Small Satellites and Diverse
Assets. 7th International Conference on
Recent Advances in Space Technologies
(RAST). 2015. Document Location:
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/72
08374
Phases of Research & Analysis
• Phase 1:
Phase
• Initial Project Proposal and Approval
1
• Phase 2:
• Develop criteria to evaluate various project
requirements, as they apply to the satellite
simulator project.
Phases of
• Phase 3: Phase Research Phase
4 and 2
• Conduct research of chosen topic, develop Analysis
requirements, and testing criteria.
• Phase 4:
• Using evaluation criteria of phase 2 and
research of phase 3, implement the Phase
project in form.
3
• Final Presentation of Findings (Dec 2019)
Research Summary
Project Deliverables
• Provide Overview of Small Satellites and Operational Satellite Mission
Architecture
• Analyze the Development of COSMOS
• What is COSMOS?
• How does COSMOS relate to Satellite Communications?
COSMOS
Primary Tools
COSMOS and Satellite Communications
• Mission Planning & Scheduling • MPST Block Diagram
Tool (MPST)
• Converts mission planning and
status tracking inputs into
executive command loads,
schedules, sequences, and
timelines (Human Readable)
Operational Proof-of-Concept
HawaiiSat-1 Mission
COSMOS and Satellite Communications
• COSMOS Executive Operator (CEO):
• Overview:
• Provides situational awareness of multiple
vehicles (true or simulated) simultaneously.
• Provides situational awareness for the
ground segment, including the status and
operations of all ground stations within the
network.
• CEO acts as the launching point for other
COSMOS applications, such as the MPST and
MOST utilities previously detailed.
Going Forward – NOS3
• NASA Operation Simulator for Small
Satellites – NOS3
• Overview:
• COSMOS is a difficult to implement
approach.
• NASA has developed a new program to
support a small satellite mission (NOS3).
• NOS3 allows for multiple developers to build
and test flight software with simulated
hardware models
•
• Overview:
• NOS3 has a familiar and easy to use
environment (configurable)
• Native Linux support
• Low operational overhead costs (important!)
Bringing Everything
Together
COSMOS | NOS3| C2ISS
Bringing Everything Together
• C2ISS Requirement 1:
• COSMOS is a great tool for
understanding the differing orbits
that satellite systems use.
• COSMOS offers a practical hands-
on application of Kepler’s Laws,
and how they related to satellite
systems.
COSMOS | NOS3| C2ISS
Bringing Everything Together
• C2ISS Requirement 2:
• Requirement: provides a
framework for satellite ground
stations. Highlighting how earth
stations communicate with
satellite systems, COSMOS and the
COSMOS tools offer a framework
for expanding knowledge in future
coursework and within a space
career.
COSMOS | NOS3| C2ISS
Bringing Everything Together
• Outcome/Objective :
• NASA NOS3 offers a practical
interface for implementing satellite
network applications.
• Applications and interface show
the greatest overview of how
satellite networks operate, and as
the top-level application, providing
a clear overview of ground station
networks and satellite network
applications.
Conclusions/Resolutions
Going Forward
• Performance: • Alternatives Considerations:
• COSMOS Application did not • COSMOS from Ball Aerospace
perform as desired. • Working Variant Inaccessible, not
used for testing
• Focus was to determine the best
method going forward to • NASA NOS^3 Software (will be
used going forward)
implement the networking,
communications, software, and • Concept of Project:
hardware assets into a usable final
project. • I have learned a great deal about
satellite earth stations, orbital
dynamics, and satellite networking
techniques.
Thank-you.
Mr. Nordhagen-Sorenson,
Ethan Z. http://norkdd.weebly.com/
Ethan Z. Nordhagen-Sorenson (M’12) This author became a Member (M) of IEEE in 2012. Ethan was born in
Michigan, United States of American, in 1990. Bachelor of Science in computer engineering, with an emphasis in
hardware design, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM USA, 2019. Master of Science in computer
engineering, with emphasis in information systems, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM USA, 2020.
He enlisted in the United States Marine Corps in 2008, specializing in conventional artillery and HIMARS rocket fire direction
control and communications. Leaving the military as a Sergeant (E-5) to pursue his education in the field of computer
engineering, cybersecurity, and information assurance. He is currently employed as a Research Engineer with the COSMIAC
research center at the University of New Mexico, School of Engineering, Albuquerque, NM USA. He also works within the
United States Air Force’s Space and Missile Systems Center, Advanced Systems and Development Directorate (SMC/AD) in
support of the operation and development of advanced satellite systems and communications capability.
Mr. Nordhagen-Sorenson is a professional member of the following organization other than the IEEE: American Institute of
Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), American Physical Society (APS), American Physical Society - Division of Astrophysics
(APS-DAP), American Physical Society - Division of Nuclear Physics (APS – DNP), American Legion, Veteran’s of Foreign Wars
(VFW), The American Legion, CompTIA Association for Information Technology Professionals (CompTIA – ATIP).
Works Cited - References