Sei sulla pagina 1di 4

Federalism Pros and Cons

Federalism is a system of government where power is divided between


several different entities. Each entity is given the power to share control over
the same geographic region as another entity. In the United States, a system
of Federalism is in place because laws can be passed by a local government,
the state government, or the national government.

This prevents one solitary body from being able to control every aspect
of governing over a population. It also means there are tiered laws and
systems that can be confusing for certain geographic regions when laws may
conflict. Take the marijuana legalization that has occurred in the US.
Recreational marijuana may be legal in some states, but it is illegal at the
national level.

Even though local law enforcement may not arrest someone because
the state laws say their actions are fine, national laws may dictate otherwise
and allow a national law enforcement officer to conduct an arrest anyway.

Here are some additional Federalism pros and cons to think about.

The Pros of Federalism


1. It creates a sense of local patriotism.
People feel close to their communities. Although there is always a level of
national pride, local patriotism is usually the first level of loyalty that an
individual will experience. Federalism encourages this local loyalty by allowing
communities to create laws and regulations that benefit themselves, even if
those laws wouldn’t make sense to implement in another geographic region.

2. It lessens the bureaucracy.


Although there are tiered levels of laws and regulations, the level of
bureaucracy that exists within a system of Federalism is lower than it is in
other government structures. Diverse populations have unique needs that
must be met and having a national-level government attempt to understand
those needs is always difficult. By allowing local or regional officials to have
the power to meet those needs, the safety and security of a population can be
better met.
3. It can provide evidence of success… or failure.
Because local and regional communities can create their own laws and
regulations, other government structures can look at the evidence of success
or failure from those efforts to determine if they could be used in other
geographic regions. Welfare reform in the US originated from regulation
efforts made in Wisconsin, for example, and many environmental protection
policies have originated from California.

4. It provides a better level of stability from a political perspective.


By allowing geographic regions to have a role in self-governing, the national
government achieves political stability to some extent because the people feel
like they are in control of their own destiny. The national government can then
act as more of an oversight or support network to the local and regional
governments that are in place.

5. It encourages involvement.
Because governments are at a local level, people know friends, neighbors, or
family members who are active in creating policies, procedures, or laws. Most
elected positions, from school and hospital boards to the city council and
mayor, are local offices. Because there is such open access to the
government, it encourages involvement because serving is so easy to do.

6. It separates the powers of the government.


Imagine if the President of the US were to eliminate all other branches of the
national government. No more Congress. No Supreme Court. What could
happen? Because there is a separation of powers, freedom is still ensured
because the state governments act independently of the national government
and the local governments, to a great extent, act independently of the state
government. The checks and balances it creates allows for independence.

The Cons of Federalism


1. It creates confusion.
Because the laws vary in each geographic region, people who travel or move
to a new destination may find themselves violating the law without realizing it.
Recreational marijuana may be legal in Colorado, but if you take legally
purchased product outside of the state, you are then violating the local law
there. You’re also violating national laws on marijuana with a purchase. This
makes it difficult to know if you’re actions are “right” or “wrong” as a citizen.
2. It encourages governments to “pass the buck.”
No one really wants to take accountability for failed policies in a structure of
Federalism. Everyone blames everyone else and that creates gridlock
between the various agencies. Then nothing gets done because everyone is
trying to assign blame and each group feels they have the correct ethical or
moral position. In other government systems, there is no question about who
is to blame because there is only one unit of government.

3. It creates a wealth gap.


“The rich get richer and the poor get poorer.” It’s an expression that is heard in
the US quite often and can be described as a “wealth gap.” Socioeconomic
resources are maintained at local levels and the national government is then
asked to fill-in whatever gaps may exist, with historically mixed levels of
success.

4. It causes uncertainty.
Wildfires blaze throughout the Western United States every summer. Who is
responsible for taking care of this issue so that no one gets hurt? Or a
hurricane blasts the eastern seaboard and causes extensive damage,
flooding, and homelessness. Who is responsible for responding? Because the
government is tiered, no one is really sure who needs to respond or pay for
the response and this can create delays in service.

5. It can be used for leverage.


Let’s say the national government wants to change health care laws for
everyone, but a handful of regional governments don’t want any changes to
take place. To garner support for the change, the national government could
offer additional funding or resources to the hold-out regional governments, but
not offer anything to those who agree that a change needs to be made.
Federalism is a structure that encourages dissent because that dissent can be
used as leverage to grab more resources.

6. It stops national policies from being implemented.


Local laws can hamper the passage of regional laws. Regional laws can
hamper the passage of national laws. Federalism effectively disperses powers
throughout a nation, but that also means the creation of national policies can
be incredibly difficult. Unless there are exceptions in place for each
geographic region so that individualized needs can be met in some way, it can
take more than generation to pass national-level legal changes.
These Federalism pros and cons show us that it is a political system that is
designed to ensure freedoms can be experienced, even in times of
governmental turmoil. No one has all the power, which means the population
can’t be overrun by their government. On the other hand, that insurance for
freedom comes at the cost of creating national identities, unity, and policy.

Potrebbero piacerti anche