Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
UKK Respirology on
Nebulization Treatment in
Children with
Acute Asthma
Heda Melinda N Nataprawira
Professor of Pediatric
UKK Respirologi-PP IDAI
Presented in Symposium and Webinar Meeting “Update on Nebulization Treatment in Children with Acute Asthma
and Strategy to Control Asthma”. Jakarta, 10 Maret 2019
Prof. Dr. dr. Heda Melinda Nataprawira, Sp.A(K) M.Kes
Staff Department of Child Health
Faculty of Medicine – Universitas Padjadjaran
Despite
Historymajor advancessymptoms
of respiratory in the treatment
such as of asthma
wheeze,
shortness
and the development of several
of breath, chest asthma
tightness guidelines
and cough that ,
vary over time250,000
approximately and in intensity,
people dietogether with each
prematurely
variable
year fromexpiratory
asthma airflow limitation
GINA; 2018.
WHO; 2007.
ASTHMA
Recurrent exacerbation
chronic airway with wheezing, chest
inflammation tightness, cough
Frequent of
Early initiation emergency
inhaledvisitcorticosteroid
and
(ICS) is highly hospitalisation
effective reducing asthma
symptoms, risk of exacerbations,
hospitalization, and death
Classification of Asthma
Asthma Severity
Level Asthma Control
Asthma Exacerbation
GINA; 2018.
PNAA; 2016.
Asthma Exacerbation
Mild or L i fe -
S eve re
Moderate t h re a t e n i n g
- Talk in phrases - Talk in words - Drowsiness
- Prefer sitting to - Sits hunched - Lethargic
lying forwards - Unheard breath
- Not agitated - Agitated sound
- Respiratory rate - Respiratory rate
increased >30/min
- Accessory muscle - Accessory muscle
not used being used
- Pulse rate 100-120 - Pulse rate >120
bpm bpm
- O2 saturation - O2 saturation
(room air) < 90- (room air) < 90%
95% - PEF 50% predicted
or best
GINA; 2018.
Asthma Exacerbation
Mild-Moderate
Severe
Life-threatening
PNAA 2016
Mild
PNAA Moderate
2004
Severe
Asthma Exacerbation
2017 2016 2015 2014
Mild or Moderate
Severe
Life-threatening
2012
Mild Moderate
Severe Respirator y
Arrest Imminent
GINA; 2012–2017.
Management of Acute Asthma in
GINA 2018
P r i m a r y C a re
C h i l d ≤ 5 ye a r
Setting
A c u t e C a re Adult, Adolescent,
Setting (EMG) 6 −1 1 ye a r s
PRIMARY CARE Children presents with acute or sub-acute asthma exacerbation or acute wheezing episode
MILD or MODERATE
• Breathless, agitated SEVERE OR LIFE THREATENING
• Pulse rate ≤ 200 bpm (0-3 yrs) or ≤ 180 bpm (4-6 • Unable of speak or drink
yrs) • Central cyanosis
• Oxygen saturation ≽ 92% • Confusion or drowsiness
• Marked subcostal and/or subglottic retractions
START TREATMENT • Oxygen saturation < 92%
Salbutamol 100 mcg 2 puffs by pMDI + spacer or 2.5 mg by nebulizer • Silent chest on auscultation
Repeat every 20 min for the first hour if needed • Pulse rate > 200 bpm (0-3 yrs), or >180 bpm (3-5yrs)
Controlled oxygen (if needed and available) target saturation 94-96% urgent
DISCHARGE/FOLLOW-UP PLANNING
Ensure that resources at home are adequate
Reliever: continue as needed
Management of Acute
Controller: consider need for adjustment, regular controller
Check inhaler technique and adherence
Follow up within 1-7 days
Asthma in Primary Care
Provide and explain action plan
FOLLOW UP VISIT
Setting ≤ 5 yrs
Reliever: reduce to as needed
Controller: continue or adjust depending on cause of exacerbation, and duration of need for extra salbutamol
(2018) GINA; 2018.
Risk factor: check and correct modifiable risk factors that may have contributed to exacerbation, including inhaler technique and adherence
Action plan: is it understood? Was it used appropriately? Does it need modification?
Schedule next follow up visit
PRIMARY CARE Patient presents with acute or sub-acute asthma exacerbation
Is it asthma?
ASSESS the PATIENT Risk factors for asthma-related death?
Severity of exacerbation?
FOLLOW UP
Reliever: reduce to as-needed
(2018)
Controller: continue higher dose for short term (1-2weeks) or long term (3 month), depending on background to exacerbation
Risk factor: check and correct modifiable risk factors that may have contributed to exacerbation, including inhaler technique and adherence GINA; 2018 .
Action plan: is it understood? Was it used appropriately? Does it need modification?
INITIAL ASSESSMENT Are any of the following present?
A: airway B: breathing C: circulation Drowsiness, Confusion, Silent chest
no yes
Further TRIAGE BY CLINICAL STATUS
According to worst feature
Consult ICU, start SABA and O2
yes
no
PNAA 2016
PNAA 2016
PNAA; 2016.
Treatment in Acute Care Setting
O x y ge n Other :
- i p r a t ro p i u m
Inhaled short- b ro m i d e
acting-beta - a m i n o p hy l l i n e /
ago n i s t ( S A B A ) t h e o p hy l l i n e
- m ag n e s i u m ,
Systemic
- LT R A
c o r t i c o s t e ro i d
- ICS/LABA
(SCS)
• First-line and First step : Inhaled SABA
• Second-line therapy to incomplete response to
inhaled SABA : Systemic Corticosteroid
GINA; 2018.
Overview
Corticosteroid in the Treatment
of Asthma
Role of Corticosteroids in Treatment of Asthma
• Reduce the
inflammatory
ICS cells in
asthmatic
airways
Hocchaus (1997) → ‘Airway selectivity’ Concept
→ Lung-related parameter (pulmonary deposition, pulmonary
residence time, pulmonary drug release) as important as
pharmacokinetics parameter (systemic clearance and oral
bioavailability)
Local disposition
Airway kinetics
Systemic disposition
Edsbacker S et al. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006;98:523–36.
Pharmacokinetic properties promoting safety and efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids. ↑,↓ =
corresponds to improved, reduced or no influence, respectively
Parameter Efficacy Safety Airway Selectivity
Formulation Greater lung deposition with Reduced incidence of local adverse events ↑ with optimal particle size
optimal particle size when lung deposition is maximized
Prodrug structure Increased efficacy if pulmonary If prodrug completely activated, safety will ↑ if pulmonary retention of active
retention is imporoves. Reduced not be affected. Local safety will be improved metabolite is improved and/or
efficacy if intact prodrug is for prodrugs which are not activated in oropharyngeal activation is reduced
systematically absorbed oropharyngeal area ↓ for prodrugs which are systematically
absorbed
Pulmonary High availability results in increased High availability increase systemic exposure = for a drug with no or little oral
availability lung exposure but reduce oral waist availability
Pulmonary Absorption
Pulmonary Metabolism
Effects •
between• 30Suppressing
Selective switch off in multiple
and 60the min after drug
increased
inhalation microvascular permeability and plasma
activated inflammatory genes
(transrepression) by reversal of leakage into the airway lumen
histone acetylation • Acutely suppressing airway hyperfusion
• Increasing mRNA degradation and in a dose-dependent manner
hence blocking production of pro- • Inhibiting the remodeling process (only
inflammatory cytokines long-term therapy in a dose-dependent
• Increasing the synthesis of anti- manner)
inflammatory proteins
Pressurized Meter
Dose Inhaler Dry powder
(pMDI)
Nebulizer
Inhaled Cor ticosteroid (ICS)
Nebulization
Jet
Budesonide Inhalation
Various Inhaled Corticosteroids
Fluticasone Beclomethasone
Furoate
Budesonide Mometasone
FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE (FP)
• A potent dan poorly oral absorbed topically active
corticosteroid and extensively metabolized in the
liver to an inactive compound
Carolyn M et al. Kendig’s Disorders of the Respiratory Tract in Children. Ninth Ed; 2019 pp 686-21.
FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE (FP)
• More likely to produce sore throat and hoarseness
than other ICS
Carolyn M et al. Kendig’s Disorders of the Respiratory Tract in Children. Ninth Ed; 2019 pp 686-21.
BECLOMETHASONE (BDP)
• BDP is less potent than FP dan Budesonide (BUD)
• Advantage:
– Poor systemic absorption
– Effective in improving lung function and controlling
asthma
Carolyn M et al. Kendig’s Disorders of the Respiratory Tract in Children. Ninth Ed; 2019 pp 686-721.
Janson C. et al, Int J of Pulm, 2017;12: 3055–64.
The reversible process of budesonide endogenous
esterification with fatty acids in the airway/lung tissue
Results
Methods
RCT
• Severe Acute Asthma Group;
Nebulized Budesonide (BUD) (1500 BUD had 58% reduction in
μg) vs Placebo (Normal Saline) the risk of hospital
Children aged 2-12 tahun, Moderate admission
or Severe Acute Asthma Exacerbation • Asthma Severity Score
Outcome: Hospital admission rate and
Asthma Severity Score
significantly lower in BUD
group
Methods
- Single-center, double-blind, Results
placebo-controlled and parallel ▪ Total hospital LOS:
group trial significantly shorter in
- Children aged 7-72 months, BUD group
asthma exacerbation (Clinical ▪ Reduce the overall cost of
Asthma Score) 3-9
treatment
- Treatment group: addition of
inhaled Budesonide 2 mg/day (n:
50) vs control group: Inhaled NS 2
mL (n:50)
Razi et al. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2015;166(4):297–303.
Total hospital LOS was Discharge rates were
significantly shorter in the significantly higher in the
budesonide group than the budesonide group at 48, 60
placebo group and 72 h
Results
LOS (hour)
Razi et al. Pediatric Pulmonology. 2017.52:720–728.
Saito et al. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;49(1):22–27.
Efficacy and Safety of High-dose
Budesonide vs Systemic Corticosteroid in
Mild Exacerbations (<3yr)
Baseline characteristics and treatment
Nebulised Budesonide (BIS) group Sistemic Corticosteroid group
Parameters
(n = 30) (n = 20)
Age (months) 20 ± 2 21 ± 2
Gender (M/F) 21:9 15:5
Thailand
Management of Pediatric Asthma Exacerbation in Hospital
Direkwattanachai et al. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2019. DOI 10.12932/AP-170918-0407.
Studi Pendukung Rekomendasi Terapi Nebulisasi pada
Tatalaksana Eksaserbasi Asma Anak
Asthma
Author Treatment arms Results
Severity
Saito, 2017 Mild 1. Neb BUD 1 mg BID + SoC BUD and PSL similar efficacy.
2. 3x/d IV PSL 0. mg/kg + SoC Serum cortisol unchanged with
BUD, decreased with PSL (safety)
Yanagida, 2015 Moderate 1. Neb 0,01% procaterol Lower frequency of inhalations
hydrochloride + 1% DSCG and IV mPSL on days 3-6 of hospitalization
1mg/kg, 3x/d with BUD.
2. Neb 0,01% procaterol Signif. higher cortisol level at
hydrochloride + BUD 0,5mg, 3x/d discharge with BUD.
Razi, 2015 Moderate- 1. SoC3 + 2mg/d neb BUD for up to Signif. shorter LOS with neb BUD.
severe 5 day Signif. less inpatients with neb
2. SoC3 + Pbo for up to 5d BUD.
Neb BUD reduced the overall
cost of treatment.
Alangari, 2014 Addition of neb BUD signif.
Moderate- 1. 3x/20’ nebBUD 0,5mg + SoC2 decrease in admission rate and
severe 2. 3x/20’ Pbo + SoC2 signif. greater drop in asthma
score in severe AEA.
Chen, 2013 Signif. improvement FEV1 at 1
1. 3x Neb sol 0,5% Salb + 0,025% IB
and 2h with BUD.
Moderate- (1mL) + 0,05% BUD (2mL)
Signif. higher complete
severe 2. 3x Neb sol 0,5% Salb + 0,025% IB
remission rate and signif. lower
(1mL) + Pbo (2mL)
need for oral CS with BUD.
Rapid Effects on Inhaled Corticosteroids in Acute
Asthma
An Evidence-Based Evaluation
• Published RCT (1996-2006) from different data bases-adults & children
• Primary outcome: admission and ED discharge rates
CONCLUSION
❑ ICS present early beneficial effects (1 to 2 h) when used in multiple
doses administered in time interval < 30 min over 90 to 120 min.
❑ A possible candidate: NON GENOMIC EFFECT
Informasi Tambahan