Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Copyright ©2012. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.
Manuscript received March 8, 2011; provisional acceptance June 16, 2011; revised manuscript received
July 11, 2011; final acceptance July 14, 2011.
DOI:10.1306/07141111038
the ratio 2:1:1, respectively. Finally, the Zoophycos Test). In each simulation, the distribution of DTs
ichnofacies comprises Zoophycos DTs and Phyco- is randomly generated and the probability of con-
siphon DTs in a 1:1 ratio. These models do not cover nectivity is calculated. New configurations are added
the full complexity of the trace-fossil assemblages until the probability of vertical and lateral con-
observed in the various ichnofacies; however, they nectivity unity (i.e., almost surely a continuous con-
provide a good first pass for establishing the effects nection between burrows across the entire cube
of burrow morphology and trace associations on volume exists).
burrow connectivity.
The connectivity simulations are conducted on
several configurations for each of the eight models. RESULTS
Nine to 22 configurations were required for each
model. Every configuration contains a different The results of the simulation experiments are pre-
number of DTs that are populated into the vol- sented graphically in Figures 3 and 4 and described
ume. Subsequent configurations progressively in- below. Three statistical values are tracked for each
crease the number of DTs from one to several thou- model simulation: the bioturbation intensity (percent
sands. The variation between configurations of the bioturbation) at 0.1 probability of interconnections
same model allows for a range of bioturbation in- (P10), the bioturbation intensity at 0.5 probability of
tensities (percent volume occupied by DTs) to be interconnections (P50), and the bioturbation intensity
tested. Burrow connectivity is simulated on each at 0.9 probability of interconnections (P90). The
model configuration 1000 times (i.e., a Monte Carlo P10 is considered to represent the value at which
Figure 3. Graphs of the probability of connectivity versus intensity of bioturbation for (A) the Skolithos model, (B) the Planolites model, (C) the Thalassinoides model, (D) the
Zoophycos model, and (E) the Phycosiphon model. The solid lines represent lateral connections between burrows, whereas the dashed lines represent vertical connectivity. Ac-
companying the graphs is a table that displays the P10, P50, and P90 values of bioturbation intensity for vertical and lateral connectivity in the various models.
Figure 4. Graphs of the probability of connectivity versus intensity of bioturbation for (A) the Skolithos ichnofacies model, (B) the Cruziana ichnofacies model, and (C) the Zoophycos
ichnofacies model. The solid lines represent lateral connections between burrows, whereas the dashed lines represent vertical connectivity. Accompanying the graphs is a table that
preferential percolation of fluids through the bur-
row network (assuming the burrows are more
permeable than the surrounding matrix) occurs
with low certainty and, therefore, represents the
initiation of connectivity. The P50 is the midpoint
value for percolation, where a moderate certainty
exists in the connectivity of burrows. The P90 is
the value at which a high degree of certainty exists
that a continuous burrow network has developed
(i.e., a complete biogenic conduit that can trans-
mit flow). However, these values are chosen as
arbitrary cutoffs for the purposes of this study and
do not hold any significance in percolation theory.
The values for P10, P50, and P90 are tabulated
and accompany the graphs of bioturbation in-
tensity versus probability of percolation and/or
displays the P10, P50, and P90 values of bioturbation intensity for vertical and lateral connectivity in the various models. interconnections (Figures 3, 4).
efficiency. The potential for establishing connections Skolithos ichnofacies and Skolithos DT models were
with neighboring burrows is heightened when ani- the last to exhibit burrow interconnectivity because
mal movement has occurred in all three dimensions. the computer-generated Skolithos is narrow and or-
The relationship between burrow architecture iented vertically. As a result, the potential for lateral
and percolation (assuming permeable burrows and an connections with nearby DTs is minimal, and ver-
impermeable matrix) is evident in the simulation re- tical percolation only results when Skolithos DTs are
sults, where vertical connectivity developed in the stacked atop one another.
models in the following order (lowest to highest
bioturbation intensity): Phycosiphon, Thalassinoides, Unconnected Burrows Still Affect Permeability
Cruziana ichnofacies, Zoophycos ichnofacies, Zoo-
phycos, Planolites, Skolithos ichnofacies, and Skolithos. Although interconnections between burrows forming
The controls of shape and orientation can also be porous and permeable networks are critical for fluid
observed in the order in which lateral connectivity flow, the presence of non-interconnected burrows
developed (lowest to highest bioturbation intensity): can still have marked effects on bulk permeability. In a
Zoophycos and Phycosiphon, Zoophycos ichnofacies, study investigating coupled fracture-matrix fluid
Thalassinoides, Planolites, Cruziana ichnofacies, Sko- flow, Philip et al. (2005) showed that in reservoirs
lithos ichnofacies, and Skolithos. This order reflects with weakly connected fractures, fluid flow was very
the positive effects of increasing burrow branching sensitive to the lengths of fractures, whereas the
or meander on connectivity. Percolation progresses aperture of fractures (i.e., fracture permeability) was a
first in the models consisting of forms that sub- less important consideration. The fracture length is
stantially extend in the vertical and lateral directions, important because it ultimately determines the
followed by forms confined to one direction. The proportion of fluid flow that occurs through the