advocated that SME

entrepreneurs can
significantly
benefit from formal Unexpected
The lack of learning- growth can
business plans to set lead to unexpected
oriented planning and
objectives, generate and outcomes;
control systems Increasingas a major
Critical
Interesting evaluations
features of
that understanding the dynamics
No Topic BM
Authors business for
evaluate communicating
model
Previous changes
Research new cause
Approachesof crisis in SMEs’
tocommercial
Problem business
Bianchi, characterize
The
model eclectic
strategies, ofby the
business;
monitor main
theory and of generated
growth
Static by
management;
perspective SME's
prevents
11 ESG Bivona induced
causes strategic
oftofailure in small model
and analysis
financial needs
policies to
on
entrepreneurship
Conventional
commit
initiatives their
are BM owner
Though
nascent
support only
strong learn
strategists from
evidence
entrepreneurs and
Bianchi
(2000) business growth et al. sales revenues and
12 BMA
ESG / presented
structures
implementation,
difficult sinceby Verheul
are often andlacking
conventional Interconnection
financial
exists forperformance
experimenting
decision-makers,supporting ofenabling
with and
the
their
Business (2002)
Grosser; Scholars
management
(2002)
of an and practitioners
provides
effective a profitability,
entrepreneurship, onpicture;
one side,
internal
13 Dynamic communicate
Serious games are seen as not
value for
Business ofbigger
game
Models basedand, as a
(2016) management
have criticizedway tools
the (e.g.,
adoption them
and
These theto evaluate strategic
networking
approaches capital
generate
Model Jovy
Cosenz; acomprehensive
communication
with different
convenient framework
capability
stakeholders.
to (entrepreneurial
Smaller
learning,
result, firms
research
identifying often intention),
thelack
most
14 Business SWOT tooanalysis, industry initiatives andon alternatives
(2017) of
Simulation
Business in
and
On athe
which static
quality
experience external
other due
the perspective
hand,tomacro-
complex and
(1) a too valuable
and liquidity,
external
managerial
concerning insights
and the
intoother
(institutional)
their financial
impact BMfS,
on
Model (DBM) Noto
Teplov analysis, portfolio analysis) effective
This
in underutilization
fluent environments may be
Business
15 Model in
Mainthe
level
static
and design
focus of
determinants,
empiricalviewpoint
uncertain and
analysis this use
thatline
life-world of
of
formingof for
they small
factors do
resources; business
not
(e.g.
entrepreneurial fully
national
this owner
inhibits
intentions them
strategies,
associatedwith especiallya lack in
of
for Abdelkafi;
(2016) cannot sufficiently
conventional
Despite stillthe Business
fact that capture
BMfS where
ABMS there isthe little or no
16 Model
Simulation* Valuable
work
supply
prevents
conducted
the insights
rests
one
entrepreneur on
from into
the
inframing
an conceptualize
wealth
from
has
terms level
using
been of
understanding and
formal ofeconomic
neglected;
business control
how Whilst
to
Tauscher
Newbery; and
Model
is depict
aother the respective
representations.
promising research prior experience.
Sustainabilit (2016) concepts
implications
and
the
by demand
dynamic
environment for
scholarsfor individual
complexity
that protects of relationship
Most
growth)
systems.
previous works
sustainability
design remains
real between
that
world
and
conceptualmodels consider the on
17 ESG
y (BMfS) Lean; Moizer dynamic
Cannavacciu methodology
learning and
entrepreneurship,
business
(Hutchinson sectors in and
the
and design
Ray of Assessing
com-pany,
EL as determined
understudied aits
new and venture's
customers,
by
is not
the student
complexity from key 1986;
risks, entrepreneurial
profitability
uponwhichABMSare
potential for experience
success is
18 ES (2014)
olo, et al entrepreneurship,
alternative
eventually
markets,
Robinson (2) approaches
affect
and a the
bounded
Pearce to
1984; and the
exceptional
explained natural
bycircumstances
traditional
Shim; such as bankruptcy or has been established
based.DesigningABMSinvolv
difficult due to the as one
limited
(2017) published applications of such
environment.
19 ES Bliemel; Choi entrepreneurship
decision
focus
Sexton
emotionalonandprocess
financial
Van Auken
trauma, of whilst factor
es ashaving
cognitive failure,
identifying analysis.
a opportunity
significant
essential
Cosenz
(2017) ABMS
education in this
individuals.
parameters
1985) has
encouraging that research
that are
demonstratedarebetter
reflection field availability
not recognition
positive
of
causalorinformation
creation
relationship of
20 BMS concepts
on these (e.g.
firms. agents,
As a result,
(2017) are
able few.
to
sufficient deal
the perilsthe
through to with
explain
associated the
double-loop how breakthrough
withaa with entrepreneurial innovations.
Only
ongoingrecently,
and papersgame objects,
situated subsidizers andand otherintent,
contexts) and
business
structured
learning may
of and become
iterative the
their effect of simulated
applying
nature ofABMS
learning. have begun stakeholders are often the
relationships, and
successful
sophisticated
play. andapproach
the different
to agents’
entrepreneurial
plausible experience
behavioral
to beinpublished reluctant to commit to novel
sources
P&C of value,in(3) a
SMEs. is unknown
rules that are consistent
entrepreneurship . ventures.
shortage of a selective with the literature.
approach to identify the
main variables underlying a
business activity
architecture in action, and
(4) a lack of a systemic
perspective in depicting
both business performance
management and
measurement

ESG Entrepreneurial Serious Games

BMA Business Model Analysis
BMI Business Model Innovation
ENT Entrepreneurship
ESG Entrepreneurial Simulation
Demonstrate how interactive
learning environments (ILEs)
matching system dynamics
The
(SD) aim
withofaccounting
the paper models
is to Computational modeling
introduce
may support entrepreneurs and
Researchcomputation
Objectives Shows simulation
Contributions
the usefulness of Methodology
modeling
Combining and an
conventional Small, micro
experiments
system dynamics family-
(especially
(SD) System Dynamics;
and
The
Prove other
main small
objective
usefulness business
of of
SD thiskey- Moving from a static to a
experimental
Business Model simulation
schemas owned
using
models firms
SD)forfacilitate
supporting Accounting Models
System Dynamics;
actors
study
modeling intounderstanding
is build
into a
SMEs' model
P&C to dynamic perspective
approach
with System
processes as a
Dynamics
originating from estimating
The the learning
paper presents
entrepreneurial a of Accounting Models
System dynamics (SD)
capture
Systems the
complementary relationship analysis, the
modelling
growth
between resultsmethod
strategies soaas toto novel
in consequences
perspective
processes in SME of growth
on methodology
Investigate
address
Utilising the
dynamic
a complexity
quasi-experimental use of a DBM
Provides
executing a
entrepreneurial
management. new approach
strategic learning System dynamics (SD)
strategy
foster design tool
diagnosis
entrepreneurship and that
policymay
inner
and
pre-test
overcome
design. logic
interactions
and BMfS
several ofand
ofpost-test by design, may
strategic
limitations contribute
perspective
initiatives
and offers
Proposing on
given
aevidencein
BMfS and
the tight
dynamic that methodology
System dynamics (SD)
external
integrating
initiatives, macro-level
different
business models, overcoming
combines several
many
interdependencies
micro-learning insights
strategies
this study
related to assesses the macro-level model of methodology
System dynamics (SD)
determinants, andsystem
to explore The
business Study
perspectives
and business and
model from
between
adopted forand
proposed
shortages
the the use
method
of developed
literature
business
entrepreneurship. ofmodel
intocan
a
impact
Analysing
athe
static of
view
possible a serious
the long-term,
of Business be used not only to build Quasi-Experimental
methodology Design
levels while
elements.
systemic developing
implications of a serious
coherent
elements.
in routinegames
conventional BMin
conceptual
business
game
Model on the entrepreneurial
representation. simple models (Pre - Test & Post
Socio-computational - Test)
effects
graphicalof representation
entrepreneurs’
intent
Suggest of a
changes
first year
bibliometric
in
routine that entrepreneurship
representation
modelframework
Novel
essential
that
transactions dowith
uses
concepts,
schemas.
system
impact
: but using SimVenture
entrepreneurship
Conceptualizing
supports
learning the design
strategies supply-and-
and on of
theBMfS. education
dynamics are explored
notation. approach using Agent-Based
undergraduate
method for students on firms’
Dynamic performances
also to build more Model
Business
demand
debating
structural thedesigning
design ofagent-
factors. an (survival and growth) as
Bibliometric
Model method using
studying
based business
models (ABMs)at a UK
in Canvas
complex(DBMC);
models that take Business Model
Agent-Based Canvas
Model
innovative
properties BM
of framework
entrepreneurial well as on systemic
university.
entrepreneurship Overcoming
a large number several
of (BMC) + System Dynamics
that combines theresearch.
clusters. Business shortages
performances related to
concepts andof their (SD)
Model the creation and
interrelations into
conventional BM
Canvas (BMC) with System consideration.
diffusion
structures.
Dynamics (SD) modelling. of innovation in firms
networks.
 to investigate in a systematic
way the mechanisms by
Use a single case study of an e- which the environmental
commerce
The application of multi- value proposition, value to
startup
country company
data, and
although the
it Interactive
the customer, learning
and captured
Suuport participants in Less of design of experiments Many
generalizability
enables the of the
application case
of the environment
value can for Digital
reinforce each Start
understanding and statistical support; The
A conceptual
Based this specific model
onResults might
article be to limited;
various
more
Up
how the other;
countries, Expansion
variables
growth --> could
The have
problem
learning
framework
background, objective;
describing
this paper Doesn't
has Limitation
also shown Learning
been
is orof
Future
included
because many
the
evaluation
from system
Research a
of digital
Model
inevitably
specific explain
focusesresults
factors how
onin
that to
activities
increased
sharply in due to
dynamic the importance
model, aiming ofat
Most
how
has significant
to build
outlined an result
generic measure instruments
startup
Further can't
research for
theoretical-conceptual serious
get right
will be
Outline the advantages the
error German
rates,
characterise learning
market
compared result;
management
A database of case studies andto pays
a the decision
more makers’
accurate capture
-analysis
SD(a)models
limitsof to growth,
embodying
the DBM games using
perspective;
learning
required from
to SD methods
feedback;
and
Within
(b) disadvantages
this
shifting the of
burden, little
tailoredatten-tion
complexity
from model
multiple in to current
based
SMEs on one
discourage
industries and cognition
of overall
Connect indevelop
the
national
computational
more
economic
The
the dynamic
financial
interpreted asmacro-
a applied knowledge
computational
intervention,
ABMS
and
The (c)isescalation
model increasingly
that global
country’s
amarket trends;
systematic time-series
sectors can bedata;
replication of
first development
behaviour;
modeling Theof BMfS, the
tomanagement
on it can
level
strategy
modelingmodel
perspective tool
with of
and
aimed
SD toforat Social aspects such as Involving
DBM
be in
approach
insightful entrepreneur’s
to and
study itsthe
motivational
regarded
connects as
four factors
a viable
partial Small sample
approaches
developed to explore size
commonly might be development
accounting of
topics specifically
and
entrepreneurship;
tailor them
outlining
business to
formal
model a employee management, personal
effectiveness
mental attitudes
models or thewill
inofmodels
(personal
research
models: attitudes,
methodology
the firm, the also
in a a
adopted reason
in
systematic for
bigger confusing
way company
the tailored
demonstrate country its potential
The model
specific
analysis.
conceptual SME is able to certain aspects nature
supporting of the decision
entrepreneurial
The topological
perceived
that fits the
environment, behavioural
characteristic
theof results
practice regarding
effectiveness ofof
in introducing customer
the
this impact
approach entrepreneurs
SD of Future
undoubtedly
benefit
Modeling research
learning
and
increase or inthe
should
capture
representations
properties
Analysis
control
features
decision of
and of complex
the the
social
maker, and -
satisfaction,
entrepreneurship
The
in serious
describing as
game
andwell as
used
improvingin this
making
initiatives
ABMS
managers
precision
therefore
as an
processes.
and
research
ofthat
explore
additional
business
in
operate
predictions
the
strategic inthe
and
non-linear
how behaviour
an organization investors’ behavior during the application
strategy
entrepreneurship
businesses of
design.
that the proposed
should
strive for
emerging
combination
networks) network
between
exerted are
no as well
research as is non-significant
set in the context of enable
impacts better
of a understanding
range of
entrepreneurship
the customer
generated
operates
influenced through
and creates
byinvigorate
the the start-up
that give BMs.
loss-generating period planning
approach
Develop
have tool.
to games
achieving be to
more
amorethe analysis
applied
positive impact
BMC
research.
more and
significant SD
To
complete modelling
change on
insight coefficients
a
Themanufacturing
proposed for cultural
bibliometric
-regarding exit strategies, have knowledge of national
serious
of other types specifics,
across
of when
feedback
value.
learning loop.
strategies and approachable
on society, on by
the DBMC
economy,
to
EI;
the enhance the
application of
in BMfS variables;
business.
method does not entirely different factors
educational
entrepreneurial may be of
ecosystems,
decision making not been
Another included
limitation, in
which and
and its
novices
the
different effectiveness
in the
natural
importance simulationin
for
communication
It found
ABMS in that serious remove subjectivity from the such disciplines and
as start-ups contexts.
networks
criteria firms use when themodel.
prohibited us from creating supporting
methodology,
environment;
each specific entrepreneurial
and
economy that the
effectiveness
gaming as
entrepreneurship an of start-
initial EE Limited user
early steps of ABMS interface and makers’ communities.
choosing partners. activities
procedure
more precise tailored models, future research can identify andmay business
add a layer
up business
intervention
research, thisstrategy
decreased
study
is data communication
of
thevalidity checksstrategies,
contingencies to counter
that make
and,
EI.
proposesas result,
a
availability that
certainprovide
subjectivity inchallenges
organizationsbuilding for
better
speed up the
bibliometric method, researchers
ABMs. and
prepared for a transition to
acquisition
which can further of be practitioners.
BMfS;
subsidies and
utilized to design other
sources of funding. comparison between
ABMs, and analyzes successful and less
essential concepts. successful transformations
to BMfS can provide key
insights into potential
contingencies.