Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Abstract: To investigate the anomalous migration process of ammonia nitrogen in vadose zone,
laboratory and numerical experiments of chloride and ammonia nitrogen are used to
gain the transport parameters and evaluate the physical and chemical heterogeneity.
Batch adsorption experiments and column experiments of silty loam and silty clay were
conducted to determine key transport parameters. BTCs of chloride and ammonia
nitrogen are derived using three approaches: the equilibrium advection-dispersion
equation (ADE), mobile-immobile model (MIM), and continuous time random walk
(CTRW-TPL). All the models show accepted fitness to the transport process of
chloride, but CTRW-PTL fits best. For ammonia nitrogen, CTRW with the retardation
term (Λ) can fully describe the tracer-BTC, especially for late-time tailing, while ADE
and MIM not. Concentration fluctuation and irregular behavior in silty clay are more
violent than those in silty loam. Physical heterogeneity has little effect on anomalous
trait of BTCs in homogenous media. And Lower permeability and mass exchange
between mobile and immobile region contribute to increasing anomalous behavior.
Adsorption heterogeneity is the main contributor to anomalous behavior. The more
violent anomalous behavior can be related to the higher retardation. Our results reveal
the non-Fickian variance of ammonia nitrogen which will provide useful insights for
decision-makers in the assessment and management of groundwater pollution.
Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation
Manuscript Click here to access/download;Manuscript;Paper-12-5.docx
41 ̃ (𝑢)
𝜓
42 ̃ (𝑢) = 𝑡̅𝑢
𝑀 (8)
1−𝜓̃ (𝑢)
43
44 1
𝑣𝜓 = ∑ 𝑝(𝑠)𝑠 (9)
45 𝑡̅
46 𝑠
47 11
𝐷𝜓 = ∑ 𝑝(𝑠)𝑠𝑠 (10)
48 𝑡̅ 2
𝑠
49
𝐷𝜓
50 𝛼𝜓 = (11)
51 𝑣𝜓
52
53 200 Where u is the Laplace variable transform; 𝑐0 is the initial concentration and 𝑐̃ (𝑠, 𝑢) is modified
54
55
56 201 ̃ (𝑢) refers to the memory function; ψ(t) and 𝜓̃(𝑢) refer to a
concentration used by Laplace transform; 𝑀
57
58
202 probability density function and its Laplace transformed form; 𝑣𝜓 and 𝐷𝜓 are the effective tracer
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
1 203 transport velocity and dispersion coefficient which are different from those in ADE; s is the position
2
3
204 vector, 𝑡̅ is the characteristic time (Berkowitz et al. 2006).
4
5
6 205 There are different expressions of transition probability density function proposed in studies
7
8
9 206 (Berkowitz et al. 2006; Cortis and Berkowitz 2004; Margolin and Berkowitz 2002), we choose truncated
10
11
12 207 power-law Law (TPL) which contains less parameter and used widely, and its general form is expressed
13
14
208 as follows (Berkowitz 2009):
15
16
𝑒𝑥𝑝 (−𝑡⁄𝑡2 )
17 𝜓(𝑡) = [𝑡1 𝜏2 𝛽 𝑒𝑥𝑝(𝜏2 −1 𝛤(−𝛽, 𝜏2 −1 )]−1 1+𝛽 , 0<𝛽<2 (6)
(1+𝑡⁄𝑡1 )
18
19
20 209 Where 𝑡1 is an average transition time for the one step, 𝑡2 is a truncation time, 𝜏2 = 𝑡2 ⁄𝑡1 ; And β is
21
22
23 210 a dimensionless parameter controlling the relative shapes of the anomalous transport regimes strongly.
24
25
211 Solute concentration plume satisfies the Gaussian distribution for β≥2, and the form of CTRW is
26
27
28 212 equivalent to the ADE. However, for 0<β<2, the transport process of solute is irregular migration. When
29
30
31 213 1<β<2, there is moderate dispersive variation that the second moment does not exit. While 0<β<1, a
32
33
34 214 high non-Fickian dispersive shows both moment does not exit(Liu et al. 2017).
35
36
215 Additionally, the adsorptive tracer transport in CTRW is given through a modified term Λ and
37
38
39 216 reconstruct ψ(t) with w for a conservative tracer. In the Laplace transform, this is given by follows
40
41
42 217 (Cortis et al. 2006):
43
44
45 𝜓̌(𝑢) = 1 + 𝑢 + 𝛬(1-𝜑̃(𝑡)) (12)
46
47 1 1
𝜑̃(𝑡)=𝑐 + (1 − 𝑐) (13)
48 1+𝑢𝑛 𝑇𝑢
49
50 218 Where Λ is the average ‘‘sticking” rate; n is a sensitive and smaller than 1 that shows power law
51
52
53 219 tailing; c represents the relative importance which the power law versus uniform behavior; T is the
54
55
56 220 truncation time for the distribution.
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
1 221 Model Establishment
2
3
4 222 Initial Conditions and Parameters
5
6
7 223 Given the small ratio of diameter to length of the column, we simplify solute transport into one
8
9
224 dimensional vertical movement. Then, BTCs were simulated using the ADE, MIM, and CTRW-TPL
10
11
12 225 models.
13
14
15 226 For the ADE and MIM models, the simulation and inversion process is performed in Hydrus-1D
16
17
18 227 software using the flow and solute modules. According to the column experiments, the input and output
19
20
228 boundary conditions for the flow module are constant head boundary and free drainage boundary,
21
22
23 229 respectively. And those for the solute module are constant concentration boundary and zero
24
25
26 230 concentration gradient boundary, respectively. The moisture characteristic curve parameters are
27
28
29 231 predicted based on the results of the grain size analysis using the neural network prediction function. The
30
31
232 initial value of dispersity (α) is decided by column experiments of chloride. Then dispersity (α) and
32
33
34 233 hydraulic conductivity (K) are optimized by inversion module. Additionally, considering the differences
35
36
37 234 between conservative and reactive solutes, ammonia nitrogen needs adsorption parameters. Initial values
38
39
40 235 of adsorption parameters, 𝐾𝑑 and Nu, are enumerated in Table 3 and optimized by inversion. In the
41
42
236 modeling of MIM, keeping the parameters of ADE unchanged, first-order mass transfer coefficient (𝜔)
43
44
45 237 and immobile volumetric water content (𝜃𝑖𝑚 ) are determined by HYDRU-1D inversion process.
46
47
48 238 CTRW-TPL modeling is conducted using CTRW Matlab toolbox v3.1. The input and output
49
50
51 239 boundary conditions are the Dirichlet boundary and Neumann boundary, respectively. There are five
52
53
54 240 required parameters for simulation of chloride, v, D, β, 𝑡1, and 𝑡2 . The initial values of v and D are
55
56 241 calculated with column experiments. Another extremely sensitive parameter, β, a broad range from 1 to
57
58
59 242 1.9 is tested. The average transition time for the one step (𝑡1 ) is set 10-2 and the truncation time (𝑡2 ) is set
60
61
62
63
64
65
1 243 1010 as initial values. Then these parameters would be inversed. After the optimal values of chloride’s
2
3
244 parameters are obtained, they are used for ammonia nitrogen as initial values. Additionally, the extra
4
5
6 245 parameters, n and Λ, are modified by trial and error.
7
8
9 246 Model Optimization
10
11
12 247 After ascertaining the initial values of these parameters, inversion process would be carried out to
13
14
248 get optimal result. Three statistic indexes are proposed: correlation coefficient (r2); the root mean
15
16
17 249 squared error (RMSE); relative error (RE).
18
19 2
20 ∑𝑁 𝑁
𝑖=1 𝑐𝑖𝑜 ∑𝑖=1 𝑐𝑖𝑒
[∑𝑁
𝑖=1 𝑐𝑖𝑜 𝑐𝑖𝑒 − ]
21 𝑁
𝑟2 = (14)
22 𝑐𝑖𝑜 2 𝑐𝑖𝑒 2
23 [∑𝑁 2 𝑁 2
𝑖=1 𝑐𝑖𝑜 − 𝑁 ] [∑𝑖=1 𝑐𝑖𝑒 − 𝑁 ]
24
25
∑𝑁
𝑖=1(𝑐𝑖𝑜 − 𝑐𝑖𝑒 )
2
26 RMSE = √ (15)
27 𝑁
28
29 ∑𝑁
𝑖=1 𝑐𝑖𝑒
RE = | 𝑁 − 1| (16)
30 ∑𝑖=1 𝑐𝑖𝑜
31
32 250 Where N is the total concentration points; 𝑐𝑖𝑒 and 𝑐𝑖𝑜 are the ith modeling concentration value and
33
34
35 251 measured concentration value.
36
37
38 252 Result and Discussion
39
40
41
42 253 Adsorption Characteristic
43
44
45 254 For batch adsorption experiments, the adsorption law and the adsorption capacity of ammonia
46
47
48 255 nitrogen in silty loam and silty clay are derived using the kinetics curves and the equilibrium curves
49
50 256 (Figure 2 and Figure 3).
51
52
53 257
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
1
2
3 300
4
5
6
7
8 200
9
st (g/g)
10
11
12
100
13
14
15
16
17 0
18
19 Silty loam Silty clay
20
0 200 400 600
21
22 t (min)
23
24 Figure 2 Adsorption kinetic data and model fitting curve of ammonia nitrogen in soils(t refers to the
25
26
27 shaking time and 𝑠𝑡 refers to the concentration of ammonia nitrogen in soils at time t)
28
29
30 As shown in Figure 2, the plot of adsorbed mass versus time is non-linear and the rate of
31
32 adsorption is on the decline gradually. Adsorbate residence time is one of the most effective factors in
33
34
35 kinetic system (Ho 2006). For ammonia nitrogen in both media, adsorptive mass reaches 90%~100%
36
37
38 of the maximum capacity in 5 minutes. After 5 minutes, the curves exhibit a slight fluctuation owing to
39
40
41 a continuous adsorption and desorption process. Although, silty loam and silty clay exhibit similar
42
43 adsorption trend, they possess significantly different adsorption capacities. With similar initial
44
45
46 concentration (20mg/L), the adsorption capacity is 222.28 μg/g for silty loam and 303.09 μg/g for silty
47
48
49 clay. The difference of clay content in soils indicates small particle diameter leads to stronger adsorption
50
51
52 (Abdulgawad et al. 2009; Sieczka and Koda 2016). Pseudo-second order model is the optimal one and
53
54 matched parameters are presented in Table 4. Considering the characteristic of kinetic models, the
55
56
57 process of adsorption of ammonia nitrogen is controlled by surface-rate step (Tan and Hameed 2017).
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
1 Table 4 Fitting equations and parameters of adsorption kinetic experiment (k refers to the pseudo-second
2
3
order rate constant)
4
5
6 Soils Temperature Fitting equation 𝑟2 k 𝑠𝑒
7
8
9 (℃) (g/μg*min) (μg/g)
10
11 222.3𝑡
12 Silty loam 20 𝑠𝑒 = 0.97 0.019 222 28
0.23 + 𝑡
13
14 303.99𝑡
Silty clay 20 𝑠𝑒 = 0.99 0.014 303.99
15 0.23 + 𝑡
16
17
18
19
20
21 1000
22
23
24
25
se (g/g)
26
500
27
28
29
30
31
32 0
33
34 Silty clay Silty loam
35
36 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
37 ce (mg/L)
38
39
Figure 3 Adsorption equilibrium data and model fitting curve of ammonia nitrogen in soils (𝑐𝑒 and 𝑠𝑒
40
41
42 refer to the equilibrium concentration of ammonia nitrogen in liquid and soils)
43
44
45 Adsorption isotherm exhibits the inter-relationship between the concentration in absorbent and
46
47
48 absorbate. In Figure 3, the adsorption thermodynamics curves show that adsorption capacity increases
49
50
with the given concentration until it reaches the maximum mass. Of the three adsorption models (linear,
51
52
53 Freundlich and Langmuir) used to fit the equilibrium data, Langmuir isothermal model yields the highest
54
55
56 of r2 (Table 5). According to the calculated coefficient values in Table5, the maximal capacity is
57
58
59 811.49μg/g for silty loam and 1399.45μg/g for silty clay.
60
61
62
63
64
65
1 258 Table 5 Fitting equations and parameters of adsorption equilibrium experiment (K refers to the Langmuir
2
3
259 constant rate constant)
4
5
6 Temperature 𝑠𝑒 K
7 Soils Fitting equation 𝑟2
8 (℃) (μg/g) (L/mg)
9
10 811.49𝑐𝑒
Silty loam 20 𝑠𝑒 = 0.998 811.49 0.0396
11 20.62 + 𝑐𝑒
12
1399.45𝑐𝑒
13 Silty clay 20 𝑠𝑒 = 0.993 1399.45 0.0476
14 12.98 + 𝑐𝑒
15
16
17 260 Transport Characteristic
18
19
20 261 Normalized concentration in column experiments is calculated by Equation (15) and presented in
21
22
23 262 Figure 4 and Figure 5.
24
𝑐
25 𝑐𝑓 =
26 𝑐0 (15)
27
28
29 263 Where 𝑐𝑓 is normalized concentration, c is the measured concentration, 𝑐0 is the inlet
30
31 264 concentration. By analytic solution of one dimensional convective and diffusion equation (Brigham
32
33
34 265 1974), the initial values of partial parameters for chloride used in models are calculated (Table 6).
35
36
37
38
39
40 1.0
41
42
43
44
45 0.5
cf
46
47
48
49
50 0.0
51
52 Column1 Column3
53 -500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
54 t (min)
55
56
57 Figure 4 Measured breakthrough curves in silty loam
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
1
2
3
4
1.0
5
6
7
8
9
0.5
cf
10
11
12
13
14
15 0.0
16
Column2 Column4
17
18 0 27000 54000 81000 108000 135000 162000
19 t (min)
20
21
22 Figure 5 Measured breakthrough curves in silty clay
23
24
Table 6 Parameters calculated by analytic solution of one dimensional convective and diffusion equation
25
26
27 Soils X (cm) V (cm/min) 𝐷𝐿 (cm2/min) α (cm)
28
29 Silty loam 15 0.039 0.02 0.513
30
31 Silty clay 15 0.0016 0.00079 0.503
32
33 266 The normalized concentration for chloride was observed to increase progressively over time, as
34
35
36 267 shown in Figures 4 and Figure 5. This indicates that the soil column was filled well and there was no
37
38
39 268 obvious preferential flow. Comparing the shape of breakthrough curves for ammonia nitrogen and
40
41
269 chloride, typical non-Fickian features could be clearly observed for ammonia nitrogen with earlier
42
43
44 270 breakthrough and later tailing. The starting penetration time of ammonia nitrogen lags behind that of
45
46
47 271 chloride in both soils because ammonia nitrogen undergoes retardation in transport process. The
48
49
50 272 phenomenon suggests reactive process in pore scale is a significant factor to anomalous transport
51
52
273 behavior. Additionally, irregular performance in silty clay is more violent than that in silty loam. This can
53
54
55 274 be attributed to the more clay particles. The pores in clay are tiny and heterogeneous which cause
56
57
58 275 concentration fluctuations in local scale.
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
1 276 Modeling Characteristic
2
3
4 277 Simulated leaching concentrations of chloride and ammonia nitrogen by ADE, MIM and CTRW
5
6
7 278 were provided in Figure 6~9.
8
9 279
10
11
12
13
14
15 1.0
16
17
18
19
0.5
cf
20
21
22
23
24 Measured
25 0.0 ADE
MIM
26
CTRW-TPL
27
28 0 500 1000
29 t (min)
30
31
32 Figure 6 Fitted breakthrough curves by three models in column1
33
34
35
36
37
38 1.0
39
40
41
42
0.5
cf
43
44
45
46
Measured
47 0.0 ADE
48 MIM
49 CTRW-TPL
50 0 10000 20000 30000
51 t (min)
52
53
54
55 Figure 7 Fitted breakthrough curves by three models in column2
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
1
2 1.0
3
4
0.8
5
6
7 0.6
8
9
cf
0.4
10
11
12 0.2
13 Measured
14 ADE
15 0.0 MIM
CTRW-TPL
16
17 0 1000 2000 3000 4000
18 t (min)
19
20
21 Figure 8 Fitted breakthrough curves by three models in column3
22
23
24
25
26
27 1.0
28
29
30
31
0.5
cf
32
33
34
35
36 Measured
0.0 ADE
37
MIM
38
CTRW-TPL
39
40 0 50000 100000 150000
41 t (min)
42
43
44 Figure 9 Fitted breakthrough curves by three models in column4
45
46 280 As shown in Figure6 and Figure7, three models match the measured data of chloride well. The
47
48
49 281 fitted BTCs show symmetry distribution which indicates the transport of chloride in column1 and
50
51
52 282 column3 is Fickian. However, CTRW-TPL shows good performance in predicting the ammonia nitrogen
53
54 283 concentration, whereas ADE and MIM cannot model this behavior. Non-Fickian transport of ammonia
55
56
57 284 nitrogen could be clearly identified by comparing the estimated curves with the measured data in Figure
58
59
60 285 8 and Figure 9. Moreover, CTRW-TPL cannot adequately describe ammonia nitrogen transport in silty
61
62
63
64
65
1 286 clay.
2
3
287 According to the simulated result in Table 7, MIM model shows slightly better performance than
4
5
6 288 ADE in fitting BTC and describes a late tailing through the physical non-equilibrium process. With the
7
8
9 289 MIM model, the non-equilibrium process can be described by the solute mass change between the
10
11
12 290 mobile and immobile parts which slows down the increase rate of solute concentration (Kohne et al.
13
14
291 2009). The parameters of MIM are the immobile water content (𝜃𝑖𝑚 ) and first-order mass transfer
15
16
17 292 coefficient (ω). In Table 7, variation in the immobile water content increases in the order column1, 2, 3, 4
18
19
20 293 and mass transfer coefficient decreases in the order column1, 2, 3, 4. With increasing immobile water
21
22
23 294 content, the diffusion path between mobile and immobile regions become longer, weakening the
24
25
295 exchange and mixing of solutes between the regions(Gao et al. 2009). Consequently, the variant
26
27
28 296 distribution of flow field and smaller solute transfer contribute to the anomalous transport. Therefore, the
29
30
31 297 MIM can effectively illustrate the physical anomalous transport of chloride. However, as shown in
32
33
34 298 Figures 8 and 9, MIM fails to describe the late tailing of BTCs of ammonia nitrogen. Because mass
35
36
299 transfer in immobile region and mobile region only shows physical influence (Lu et al. 2018).
37
38
39 300 Of three models, the CTRW-TPL shows the best performance, specifically in capturing measured
40
41
42 301 BTCs with early breakthrough and late tailings. It is noteworthy that the dispersion and velocity in
43
44
45 302 CTRW change as a stochastic process but remains constant in ADE and MIM in space and time (Cortis et
46
47
303 al. 2006). Therefore, the value of dispersity in CTRW-TPL is different from other two models. The
48
49
50 304 estimated parameters of CTRW-TPL in Table 7 can be used to analyze the anomalous behavior. For all
51
52
53 305 the columns with 1.8 <β<1.85, it manifests there is a slightly anomalous behavior and a moderate
54
55
56 306 dispersive variation (Liu et al. 2017). In CTRW-TPL modeling, the inverse values of β and α in silty
57
58
307 loam are larger than those in silty clay. The variance of dispersity is related to velocity, dispersity
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
1 308 increases with increasing flow rate in fine-textured soils while not in coarser-textured soils
2
3
309 (Vanderborght and Vereecken 2007).
4
5
6 310 Table 7 Fitted parameters and with three models of ADE, MIM, and CTRW -TPL
7
8 Models Parameters Column1 Column2 Column3 Column4
9
10 K (cm/min) 0.039 0.00133 0.034 0.00133
11
12 α (cm) 0.517 0.516 0.545 0.5544
13
14 𝐾𝑑 (mL/mg) 0 0 1.8 58
15
16
ADE Nu (mL/mg) 0 0 4.7 85
17
18
19 𝑟2 0.989 0.99 0.965 0.72
20
21 RMSE 0.030 0.017 0.16 0.254
22
23 RE 0.006 0.010 0.333 0.272
24
25 K (cm/min) 0.041 0.001325 0.035 0.00133
26
27 α(cm) 0.52 0.5079 0.55 0.5445
28
29 𝐾𝑑 (mL/mg) 0 0 1.8 58
30
31 Nu(mL/mg) 0 0 4.7 85
32
33 f 1 1 1 1
34
MIM
35
𝜃𝑖𝑚 0.1181 0.143 0.163 0.2901
36
37
38 𝜔 0.4288 0.011 0.0004227 0.0000126
39
40 𝑟2 0.992 0.98 0.975 0.745
41
42 RMSE 0.029 0.016 0.138 0.274
43
44 RE 0.005 0.009 0.314 0.363
45
46 V (cm/min) 0.042 0.0018 0.0405 0.0015
47
48 D (cm2/min) 0.024 0.00079 0.0225 0.00058
49
50 α (cm) 0.57 0.43 0.55 0.39
51
52
TPL β 1.8352 1.8010 1.8407 1.8058
53
54
55 𝑙𝑔(𝑡1 )(min) -1.4610 -2.5071 -4.4117 -2.3151
56
57 𝑙𝑔(𝑡2 )(min) 16.8101 18.5276 20.1061 17.9109
58
59 n / / 0.968 0.991
60
61
62
63
64
65
Λ / / 3.46 9.71
1
2
w / / 1000 1000
3
4
5 T / / 1 1
6
7 𝑟2 0.997 0.9956 0.991 0.984
8
9 RMSE 0.028 0.021 0.051 0.119
10
11 RE 0.000609 0.000108 0.14 0.122
12
13
14 311 Non-Fickian Transport of Ammonia Nitrogen
15
16
17 312 Fluid migration and reaction process jointly influence the reactive solution transport behavior
18
19
20 313 (Berkowitz et al. 2016; Sokolov et al. 2006). The experimental and modeling results indicated that
21
22
23 314 physical heterogeneity made a little contribution to the anomalous behavior. Physical heterogeneity
24
25
315 includes less mass exchange and more velocity variation. Compared to the conservative tracer, the
26
27
28 316 reactive tracer (ammonia nitrogen) exhibited evident non-Fickian characteristic in homogeneous media.
29
30
31 317 Overall, the CTRW-TPL estimated concentration fits measured BTCs of ammonia nitrogen best. The
32
33
34 318 optimum values of β in reactive tracer not really differ from that in conservative tracer. However, the
35
36
319 average sticking rate (Λ) which describes the reactive retardation in the transport of ammonia nitrogen
37
38
39 320 appears visible deviation. As observed in Table 5, the higher value of Λ represents the more violent
40
41
42 321 anomalous behavior and smaller dispersion. This suggests a relationship between transport
43
44
45 322 characteristic and reaction retardation.
46
47
48 323 In order to evaluate the contribution of sorption to retardation process in simulation methods, the
49
50 324 maximum adsorption mass and the actual retardation mass are provided in Table 8. In the study of
51
52
53 325 adsorption experiments, the maximum adsorption mass of ammonia nitrogen is calculated. For three
54
55
56 326 models, the retardation mass can be evaluated by equation (16) and (17) when same hydraulic
57
58
59 327 conditions in conservative and reactive tracer transport. Given that the column is packed
60
61
62
63
64
65
1 328 homogeneously, the sorption mass can be calculated assuming each particle reaches the equilibrium
2
3
329 status.
4
5
(𝜏𝑟 − 𝜏𝑐 )
6 𝑠𝑅 = 𝑐0 𝑣 (16)
7 ℎ𝜌
8 𝑐𝑓
9 τ = ∫ 𝑡𝑑𝑐𝑓 (17)
10 0
11
12 330 Where the subscripts in equation r and c are reactive and conservative tracers; 𝑠𝑅 is the retardation
13
14
331 mass; ρ and h are the density and height of column; 𝑐0 is the input concentration; t is transport time; 𝜏
15
16
17 332 is the remained mass in column.
18
19
20 333 Table 8 Maximum sorption amount estimated by models
21
22 Soils Silty loam Silty clay
23
24 Maximum adsorption mass (μg/g) 606.25 1088.91
25
26 ADE 119.0221 657.9699
27 Actual retardation
28 MIM 191.8128 609.0358
29 mass (μg/g)
30 CTRW-TPL 530.741 1176.708
31
32
33 334 In Table 8, the result shows the retardation predicted by CTRW-TPL is different from that by ADE
34
35 335 or MIM. In ADE and MIM, the actual retardation mass is less than maximum adsorption mass in
36
37
38 336 columns. While in CTRW-TPL, the actual retardation mass is closed to the experimental adsorption
39
40
41 337 mass. The adsorption reaction is the major retardation process of ammonia nitrogen in transport.
42
43
44 338 Furthermore, our results provide evidence that CTRW-TPL can depict anomalous transport of
45
46 339 adsorption reactive process.
47
48
49 340 Conclusion
50
51
52
53 341 In present study, batch adsorption experiments and column experiments in laboratory were
54
55
56 342 performed to analyze the transport of ammonia nitrogen. Three models with ADE, MIM and CTRW-TPL
57
58 343 were used to predict concentration based on inversed parameters. According to transport and parameter
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
1 344 characteristic of ammonia nitrogen in modeling and experiment, anomalous behavior is evaluated by
2
3
345 physical and reactive heterogeneity effects. The results allow for the following conclusions:
4
5
6 346 The adsorption experimental results show that pseudo-second order and the Freundlich model
7
8
9 347 exhibit the best fitting to the adsorption kinetic and equilibrium isotherms of two media. The maximum
10
11
12 348 adsorption mass of silty loam and silty clay are 811.49 μg/g and 1399.45 μg/g, respectively.
13
14
349 Three models match the measured data of chloride well. For ammonia nitrogen, CTRW-TPL shows
15
16
17 350 the most satisfying performance than ADE and MIM. Characteristics of column and numerical
18
19
20 351 experiments of chloride and ammonia nitrogen reveal that anomalous behavior is related to the physical
21
22
23 352 and reactive heterogeneous process.
24
25
353 In homogeneous medium, there are slightly physical anomalous behaviors in transport process of
26
27
28 354 conservative and reactive tracers. Lower permeability and mass exchange between mobile and immobile
29
30
31 355 regions contribute to more violent non-equilibrium concentration fluctuation.
32
33
34 356 In particular, the reactive process in pore scale plays a crucial role in anomalous behavior. Among
35
36
357 three models, MIM can model the late tailing for the physical effects but not for the adsorption reaction
37
38
39 358 heterogeneity. CTRW-TPL shows the most satisfying performance for non-Fickian transport of physical
40
41
42 359 and reactive heterogeneous effects. The average sticking rate (Λ) can suggests a relationship between
43
44
45 360 transport characteristic and reaction retardation. However, there is still an exploratory question how to
46
47
361 describe the relationship.
48
49
50 362 Acknowledgement
51
52
53
54 363 Funding: This research reported here was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of Jilin
55
56
57 364 province with ‘Study on the process of water and salt nitrogen mutual feeding in water field ecosystem of
58
59
365 soda-saline soil area’ (20150101116JC) and the project of Northeast Electric Power Design Institute with
60
61
62
63
64
65
1 366 ‘Study on the migration of pollutant components in coal - fired power plant of Northeast Electric Power
2
3
367 Design Institute’ (DG1-G01-2016).
4
5
6 368 Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
7
8
369 Reference
9
10
11 370 Abdulgawad F, Bockelmann EB, Sapsford D, Williams KP, Falconer R (2009) AMMONIUM ION
12 371 ADSORPTION ON CLAYS AND SAND UNDER FRESHWATER AND SEAWATER CONDITIONS.
13
14 372 Advances In Water Resources And Hydraulic Engineering, Vols 1-6. Tsinghua University Press,
15 373 Beijing. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-89465-0_115
16
374 Ben-Zvi R, Nissan A, Scher H, Berkowitz B (2018) A continuous time random walk (CTRW)
17
18 375 integro-differential equation with chemical interaction The European Physical Journal B 91
19 376 doi:10.1140/epjb/e2017-80417-8
20
21 377 Berkowitz B, Dror I, Hansen SK, Scher H (2016) Measurements and models of reactive transport in
22 378 geological media Reviews of Geophysics 54:930-986 doi:10.1002/2016rg000524
23 379 Berkowitz B, Scher H (1995) On characterization of anomalous dispersion in porous and fractured
24
25 380 media WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH 31:1461-1466 doi:10.1029/95WR00483
26 381 Berkowitz B, Scher H (1998) Theory of anomalous chemical transport in random fracture networks
27
382 PHYSICAL REVIEWE 57:5858-5868 doi:org/10.1103/PhysRevE.57.5858
28
29 383 Berkowitz B, Scher H, Cortis A, Dentz M (2006) Modeling non-Fickian transport in geological
30 384 formations as a continuous time random walk Reviews of Geophysics 44
31
32 385 doi:10.1029/2005rg000178
33 386 Berkowitz BB, Brian) ; Scher, H (Scher, Harvey) (2009) Exploring the nature of non-Fickian transport in
34 387 laboratory experiments ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES 32:6
35
36 388 doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.05.004
37 389 Brain B, Georg K, Genndy M, Harvey S (2001) Application of continuous time random walk theory to
38
390 tracer test measurements in fractured and heterogeneous porous media GROUND WATER
39
40 391 39:593-604 doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2001.tb02347.x
41 392 Brigham W (1974) Mixing equations in short laboratory columns Society of Petroleum Engineers
42
43 393 Journal 14:91-99 doi:10.2118/4256-PA
44 394 Bromly M, Hinz C (2004) Non-Fickian transport in homogeneous unsaturated repacked sand WATER
45 395 RESOURCES RESEARCH 40 doi:10.1029/2003wr002579
46
47 396 Burnell DK, Xu J, Hansen SK, Sims LS, Faust CR (2018) A Practical Modeling Framework for Non-Fickian
48 397 Transport and Multi-Species Sequential First-Order Reaction Ground Water
49
398 doi:10.1111/gwat.12660
50
51 399 Chakraborty P, Meerschaert MM, Lim CY (2009) Parameter estimation for fractional transport: A
52 400 particle-tracking approach Water Resources Research 45 doi:10.1029/2008wr007577
53
54 401 Comolli A, Dentz M (2017) Anomalous dispersion in correlated porous media: a coupled continuous
55 402 time random walk approach The European Physical Journal B 90
56 403 doi:10.1140/epjb/e2017-80370-6
57
58 404 Cortis A, Berkowitz B (2004) Anomalous transport in "classical" soil and sand columns SOIL SCIENCE
59 405 SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL 68:1539-1548 doi: 10.2136/sssaj2004.1539
60
61
62
63
64
65
406 Cortis A, Harter T, Hou L, Atwill ER, Packman AI, Green PG (2006) Transport of Cryptosporidium
1 407 parvum in porous media: Long-term elution experiments and continuous time random walk
2
3 408 filtration modeling Water Resources Research 42 doi:10.1029/2006wr004897
4 409 Edery Y, Dror I, Scher H, Berkowitz B (2015) Anomalous reactive transport in porous media:
5
410 Experiments and modeling Physical review E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics
6
7 411 91:052130 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.91.052130
8 412 Gao G, Zhan H, Feng S, Huang G, Mao X (2009) Comparison of alternative models for simulating
9
10 413 anomalous solute transport in a large heterogeneous soil column Journal of Hydrology
11 414 377:391-404 doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.036
12 415 Ho YS (2006) Review of second-order models for adsorption systems Journal of hazardous materials
13
14 416 136:681-689 doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.12.043
15 417 Hou L, Hu BX, Qi Z, Yang H (2018) Evaluating equilibrium and non-equilibrium transport of ammonium
16
418 in a loam soil column Hydrological Processes 32:80-92 doi:10.1002/hyp.11400
17
18 419 Hu H, Mao X, Barry DA, Liu C, Li P (2014) Modeling reactive transport of reclaimed water through large
19 420 soil columns with different low-permeability layers Hydrogeology Journal 23:351-364
20
21 421 doi:10.1007/s10040-014-1187-0
22 422 Jellali S, Diamantopoulos E, Kallali H, Bennaceur S, Anane M, Jedidi N (2010) Dynamic sorption of
23 423 ammonium by sandy soil in fixed bed columns: Evaluation of equilibrium and non-equilibrium
24
25 424 transport processes Journal of environmental management 91:897-905
26 425 doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.11.006
27
426 Kalaruban M, Loganathan P, Kandasamy J, Naidu R, Vigneswaran S (2017) Enhanced removal of nitrate
28
29 427 in an integrated electrochemical-adsorption system Separation and Purification Technology
30 428 189:260-266 doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2017.08.010
31
32 429 Kohne JM, Kohne S, Simunek J (2009) A review of model applications for structured soils: a) Water
33 430 flow and tracer transport Journal of contaminant hydrology 104:4-35
34 431 doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.10.002
35
36 432 Lester DR, Metcalfe G, Trefry MG (2014) Anomalous transport and chaotic advection in homogeneous
37 433 porous media Physical review E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics 90:063012
38
39 434 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.90.063012
40 435 Li N, Ren L (2009) Application of continuous time random walk theory to nonequilibrium transport in
41 436 soil Journal of contaminant hydrology 108:134-151 doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2009.07.002
42
43 437 Liu D, Jivkov AP, Wang L, Si G, Yu J (2017) Non-Fickian dispersive transport of strontium in
44 438 laboratory-scale columns: Modelling and evaluation Journal of Hydrology 549:1-11
45
439 doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.053
46
47 440 Lu C et al. (2018) A mobile-mobile transport model for simulating reactive transport in connected
48 441 heterogeneous fields Journal Of Hydrology 560:97-108 doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.073
49
50 442 Margolin G, Berkowitz B (2000) Application of Continuous Time Random Walks to Transport in Porous
51 443 Media THE JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY 104:3942-3947 doi:10.1021/jp993721x
52 444 Margolin G, Berkowitz B (2002) Spatial behavior of anomalous transport Physical review E, Statistical,
53
54 445 nonlinear, and soft matter physics 65:031101 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.65.031101
55 446 Neuman SP, Tartakovsky DM (2009) Perspective on theories of non-Fickian transport in heterogeneous
56
447 media Advances in Water Resources 32:670-680 doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.08.005
57
58 448 Pachepsky Y, Benson D, Rawls W (2000) Simulating scale-dependent solute transport in soils with the
59 449 fractional advective-dispersive equation SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL
60
61
62
63
64
65
450 64:1234-1243 doi:10.2136/sssaj2000.6441234x
1 451 Padilla I, Yeh T, Conklin M (1999) The effect of water content on solute transport in unsaturated
2
3 452 porous media Water Resource Research 35:3303-3313
4 453 Rezanezhad F, Kleimeier C, Milojevic T, Liu H, Weber TKD, Van Cappellen P, Lennartz B (2017) The Role
5
454 of Pore Structure on Nitrate Reduction in Peat Soil: A Physical Characterization of Pore
6
7 455 Distribution and Solute Transport Wetlands 37:951-960 doi:10.1007/s13157-017-0930-4
8 456 Rubin S, Dror I, Berkowitz B (2012) Experimental and modeling analysis of coupled non-Fickian
9
10 457 transport and sorption in natural soils Journal of contaminant hydrology 132:28-36
11 458 doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2012.02.005
12 459 Sieczka A, Koda E (2016) Kinetic and Equilibrium Studies of Sorption of Ammonium in the Soil-Water
13
14 460 Environment in Agricultural Areas of Central Poland Applied Sciences 6:269
15 461 doi:10.3390/app6100269
16
462 Simunek J, Jacques D, Langergraber G, Bradford SA, Sejna M, van Genuchten MT (2013) Numerical
17
18 463 Modeling of Contaminant Transport Using HYDRUS and its Specialized Modules J Indian Inst
19 464 Sci 93:265-284
20
21 465 Simunek J, Jarvis N, van Genuchten M, Gardenas A (2003) Review and comparison of models for
22 466 describing non-equilibrium and preferential flow and transport in the vadose zone JOURNAL
23 467 OF HYDROLOGY 272:14-35 doi:PII S0022-1694(02)00252-4
24
25 468 Sokolov IM, Schmidt MG, Sagues F (2006) Reaction-subdiffusion equations Physical review E,
26 469 Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics 73:031102 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.73.031102
27
470 Tan KL, Hameed BH (2017) Insight into the adsorption kinetics models for the removal of
28
29 471 contaminants from aqueous solutions Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
30 472 74:25-48 doi:10.1016/j.jtice.2017.01.024
31
32 473 Toride N, Inoue M, Leij F (2003) Hydrodynamic dispersion in an unsaturated dune sand SOIL SCIENCE
33 474 SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL 67:703-712 doi:10.2136/sssaj2003.0703
34 475 Tyukhova A, Dentz M, Kinzelbach W, Willmann M (2016) Mechanisms of anomalous dispersion in flow
35
36 476 through heterogeneous porous media Physical Review Fluids 1
37 477 doi:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.1.074002
38
39 478 Van Genuchten MT, Wierenga PJ (1976) Mass transfer studies in sorbing porous media I,Analytical
40 479 solutions Soil Science Society of America Journal 40:473-480
41 480 Vanderborght J, Vereecken H (2007) Review of Dispersivities for Transport Modeling in Soils Vadose
42
43 481 Zone Journal 6:29 doi:10.2136/vzj2006.0096
44 482 Varjani SJ, Gnansounou E, Pandey A (2017) Comprehensive review on toxicity of persistent organic
45
483 pollutants from petroleum refinery waste and their degradation by microorganisms
46
47 484 Chemosphere 188:280-291 doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.09.005
48 485 Wang LW, Lichun) ; Cardenas, MB (Cardenas, M. Bayani) (2014) Non-Fickian transport through
49
50 486 two-dimensional rough fractures: Assessment and prediction WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
51 487 50:871-884 doi:10.1002/2013WR014459
52 488 WHO (2003) Ammonia in drinking-water background document for preparation of WHO guidelines for
53
54 489 drinking-water quality World Health Organization
55 490 Zaheer M, Wen Z, Zhan H, Chen X, Jin M (2017) An Experimental Study on Solute Transport in
56
491 One-Dimensional Clay Soil Columns Geofluids 2017:1-17 doi:10.1155/2017/6390607
57
58 492 Zhao R, Gupta A, Novak JT, Goldsmith CD (2017) Evolution of nitrogen species in landfill leachates
59 493 under various stabilization states Waste management 69:225-231
60
61
62
63
64
65
494 doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.041
1
2 495
3
4
496
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65