Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Vertebrates
Daniel Bustos Forero
Regular seasonal migrations by organisms such as fish, birds and mammals represent a great
challenge for the individual due to the implications of resistance to unfavorable conditions and energy
costs during the migration. Despite high energy costs, migration habits serve different purposes.
There are species that migrate to get away from extremely harsh winters or torrid summers; others
looking for a suitable place for their reproduction, or to flee from their predators; while other species
migrate to ensure sufficient amount of food to increase their survival
According to this, natural selection has molded the morphology, behaviour and physiology of
organisms in relation to migratory habits. Therefore, intraspecific variation in migratory behavior is
often parallel to morphological differentiation; that is, changes in morphology can generate parallel
changes in courtship behavior or socialization, which allows variation within the same species that,
at some point, can lead to speciation.
Likewise, the performance of migratory displacement (air, land, water) has direct effects on fitness.
Therefore, the selection is expected to act to minimize the costs of migration, which increase with
distance traveled. The dynamic theory predicts how morphological adaptations improve the
performance of displacement in migratory habits.
Birds
To summarize, they showed that some morphological traits are likely adaptations to long-distance
migration and related flight costs. Also, combining the results about the predictors of migration
distance and covariance of morphological traits suggests that selection primarily optimizes the
preservation of energy assets during long travels to increase flight range per unit energy. By their
high aspect ratio that conserves energy and moderate wing loading that generates sufficient lift,
migrants might not be subject to strong selection for large flight muscle and aerobic capacity.
Hedenstrom (2008)
In this review, Hedenstrom present some key components of simple optimality models of bird
migration and briefly discuss what the relevant optimization currency applicable to migration should
be and how birds implement optimal behaviours. This paper deals with simple optimization models
about migration; migration strategies and annual routine models of migration and moult have also
been developed using state-dependent optimization. Also, Hedenstrom proposes that the migration
syndrome includes evolutionary modifications of morphology, the acquisition of orientation and
navigation skills and behavioral adjustments in relation to ecological and external factors.
Also, long-distance migrants breeding at high latitudes face severe time pressures, which is a probable
reason why natural selection has evolved efficient behaviours, physiological and morphological
adaptations allowing the maximum possible migration speed. Optimal migration theory commonly
assumes time minimization as an overall strategy, but the minimization of energy cost and predation
risk may also be involved. Based on these assumptions, it is possible to derive adaptive behaviours
such as when and at which fuel load a stopover site should be abandoned. Likewise, the fact that
migratory birds seem to ingest and process food at their maximum capacity is itself an indirect
indication that they are time minimizers. Likewise, the energy budget of migration can be subdivided
into the actual transportation costs and the maintenance and activity costs during stopovers. This fact
permits minimize unnecessary costs during flight.
In general, sedentary birds tend to have shorter, more rounded wings, longer tails and larger body size
in relation to wing span when compared to their migratory conspecifics. In addition, the minimization
of time generates changes in behavior because it alters the rest processes, permanence in predator
sites and time dedicated to feeding.
In general, all the birds that improved in condition during stopover showed an increase in the
abundance of the indicator Lactobacillus OTUs, whereas the bird whose condition worsened showed
a decrease. It is possible that feeding stimulated the growth of the indicator Lactobacillus OTUs as
well. Several species of Lactobacillus have been associated with weight gain in mammals and birds,
so an initial increase in Lactobacillus post feeding could further promote weight gain in feeding birds
during stopover
Bairlein (2002)
In this research, Bairlein argues that migratory flight performance has effect on body mass of birds.
This fact due to increase in the levels of lipids into the organism. For example, many migratory birds
accumulate large amounts of lipids as the prime energy source for their long-distance flights. This fat
accumulation is mostly under endogenous control, reflecting genetically programmed temporal shifts
of the body mass set point. It is accompanied by an increase in daily food intake and food utilization
efficiency and by a seasonal shift in food selection.
Seasonal frugivory appears to play a key role in many migrants. Fruits have a high content of fatty
acids indispensable for building up the specific depot lipids. In addition, plant secondary compounds
seem to play supportive role, but the mechanisms are not yet known. This lipid accumulation
represents a mechanism for physiological adaptation to migratory habits. Likewise, accumulation of
lipids generates a change in the morphology due to require new spaces or volume increase for storage
these compounds.
The main result of the study is that, in the partially migratory population studied, morphology and
migratory behaviour are not correlated. In many cases, this behavioral and morphological
differentiation it couldn’t be due to the phenomenon of migration. Even though, variables into the
same environment such as competition, specialization of diets, among others could be responsible to
the variations in morphology.
Fishes
In summary, the annual energy loss of adult Atlantic salmon during upstream migration and spawning
was more than 60% of the total available energy at the time the salmon were assumed to cease feeding.
Further, the cost appears to be higher in large than in small salmon. In both sexes, most of the energy
reserves used were mobilized from the muscles rather than the visceral tissue. After spawning, total
energy content were similar in females and males, indicating similar energy expenditures for the two
sexes. This energy saving and directed towards the muscles, allows an improvement of fitness by
means of physiological changes (energy saving), morphological (greater volume of muscles) and
behavioral (alteration of normal eating habits) to fulfill the purpose of migration and spawning.
Slotte (1999)
In this article, Slotte analyzes the effects of fish length and condition on spawning migration in
Norwegian spring spawning herring. According to this, the relative weekly energy loss is 3-4 times
higher during the spawning migration than during the wintering, and it increases with decreasing fish
length. Survival of progeny may increase to major fish length due to beneficial environmental
conditions. Besides, large-sized fish have higher volume for fat accumulation (energy source during
migration) and greater muscle development. These characteristics could be considered as adaptations
to migratory habits. Although, large body size increases the degree of attack by predators
Mammals
Bats must use systems of orientation other than echolocation for long-distance navigation, but they
argue that bats migrating over the sea fly low to detect the water surface by echolocation to remain
oriented. It is also possible that lower wind speeds at the low altitudes are favored by bats. This
modification in the echolocation mechanism represent a morphology innovation for increase the
probabilities of success in migration. Also, positively affects fitness.
References
Able, K. P., & Belthoff, J. R. 1998. Rapid evolution of migratory behaviour in the introduced house
finch of eastern North America. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,265(1410),
2063-2071.
Ahlén, I., Baagøe, H. J., & Bach, L. 2009. Behavior of Scandinavian bats during migration and
foraging at sea. Journal of Mammalogy, 90(6), 1318-1323.
Bairlein, F., & Totzke, U. 1992. New aspects on migratory physiology of trans-Saharan passerine
migrants. Ornis Scandinavica, 244-250.
Bairlein, F. 2002. How to get fat: nutritional mechanisms of seasonal fat accumulation in migratory
songbirds. Naturwissenschaften, 89(1), 1-10.
Courtillotl, V., Hulot, G., Alexandrescu, M., le Mouë, J. L., & Kirschvink, J. L. 1997. Sensitivity and
evolution of sea‐turtle magnetoreception: observations, modelling and constraints from geomagnetic
secular variation. Terra Nova, 9(5‐6), 203-207.
de la Hera, I., Pulido, F., & Visser, M. E. 2014. Longitudinal data reveal ontogenetic changes in the
wing morphology of a long‐distance migratory bird. Ibis, 156(1), 209-214.
Hausfater, G., & Meade, B. J. (1982). Alternation of sleeping groves by yellow baboons (Papio
cynocephalus) as a strategy for parasite avoidance. Primates, 23(2), 287-297.
Hedenstrom, A. 2008. Adaptations to migration in birds: Behavioural strategies, morphology and
scaling effects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1490),
287-299.
Jonsson, N., Jonsson, B., & Hansen, L. P. 1997. Changes in proximate composition and estimates of
energetic costs during upstream migration and spawning in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. Journal of
Animal Ecology, 425-436.
Johnston, R. A., Paxton, K. L., Moore, F. R., Wayne, R. K., & Smith, T. B. 2016. Seasonal gene
expression in a migratory songbird. Molecular ecology, 25(22), 5680-5691.
Lewis, W. B., Moore, F. R., & Wang, S. 2016. Changes in gut microbiota of migratory passerines
during stopover after crossing an ecological barrier. The Auk, 134(1), 137-145.
Lohmann, K. J., & Lohmann, C. M. 1998. Migratory guidance mechanisms in marine turtles. Journal
of Avian Biology, 585-596.
Madsen, T., & Shine, R. 1996. Seasonal Migration of Predators and Prey‐‐A Study of Pythons and
Rats in Tropical Australia. Ecology, 77(1), 149-156.
McGuire, L. P., Guglielmo, C. G., Mackenzie, S. A., & Taylor, P. D. 2012. Migratory stopover in the
long‐distance migrant silver‐haired bat, Lasionycteris noctivagans. Journal of Animal
Ecology, 81(2), 377-385.
Morganti, M., Åkesson, S., & Pulido, F. 2015. Decoupling of behavioural and morphological
differentiation in a partially migratory bird population. Bird study, 62(1), 29-38.
Saito, H., Watanabe, T., & Murase, T. 1995. The fatty acid composition characteristic of a highly
migratory fish, with seasonal variation of docosahexaenoic acid content in lipid of bonito (Euthynnus
pelamis). Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry, 59(11), 2186-2188.
Slotte, A. 1999. Effects of fish length and condition on spawning migration in Norwegian spring
spawning herring, Sarsia, 84(2), 111-127.
Vágási, C. I., Pap, P. L., Vincze, O., Osváth, G., Erritzøe, J., & Møller, A. P. 2016. Morphological
adaptations to migration in birds. Evolutionary Biology, 43(1), 48-59.