From: ​Tulsi 2020 Press (press@tulsi2020.

com)
Subject​: Tulsi Gabbard’s Campaign Calls On the DNC to Ensure Transparency in Debate
Requirements

Tulsi Gabbard’s Campaign Calls On the DNC to Ensure

Transparency in Debate Requirements

WASHINGTON, D.C. ​— ​The campaign of Congresswoman and presidential candidate Tulsi

Gabbard is calling on the Democratic National Committee to revise their list of debate qualifying
polls in light of numerous irregularities in the selection and timing of those polls, to ensure
transparency and fairness.

The DNC set a threshold that candidates must meet 2% in four DNC-certified polls in order to
qualify for the third and fourth Democratic primary debates. However, the DNC has not released
their criteria for selecting the 16 polling organizations they deem “certified.”

Rep. Gabbard has exceeded 2% support in 26 national and early state polls, but only two of them
are on the DNC’s “certified” list. Many of the uncertified polls, including those conducted by
highly reputable organizations such as The Economist and the Boston Globe, are ranked by Real
Clear Politics and FiveThirtyEight as more accurate than some DNC “certified” polls.

After examining the list of certified and non-certified polls, Michael Tracey wrote in Real Clear
Politics, “Tulsi Gabbard is on the verge of being excluded from the next Democratic presidential
debate on the basis of criteria that appear increasingly absurd.”

The Democratic National Committee has the responsibility to facilitate more conversations
between the future leaders of this country, not less. Notably, there have been only four qualifying
polls released after the second Democratic primary debate compared with fourteen qualifying
polls released in the month after the first Democratic primary debate.
Having received 2% in a qualifying CNN poll released Tuesday, August 20th, Gabbard is now
two DNC-certified polls away from qualifying for the debates in Houston next month. According
to Tracey, “Gabbard has [also] polled at 2% or more in two polls sponsored by the two largest
newspapers in two early primary states, but the DNC -- through its mysteriously incoherent
selection process -- has determined that these surveys do not count toward her debate eligibility.
Without these exclusions, Gabbard would have already qualified.”

In a 2018 memo laying out their proposed framework for the debates, the DNC wrote, “Given
the fluid nature of the presidential nominating process, the DNC will continuously assess the
state of the race and make adjustments to this process as appropriate.”

The Gabbard campaign is calling on the DNC to hold true to their promise and make adjustments
to the process now to ensure transparency and fairness. Crucial decisions on debate qualifications
that impact the right of the American people to have the opportunity to participate fully in the
Democratic process should not be made in secret by party bosses. For the sake of democracy,
those decisions must be made openly, with clear and consistent standards and a sufficient
window of opportunity for candidates to demonstrate genuine grassroots momentum and
enthusiasm.

Additional Background

Timing of polls released after the first and second Democratic primary debates
As the campaigns head into the second half of August, only four of the DNC’s list of sixteen
qualifying polling organizations - Monmouth, Fox, Quinnipiac and CNN/SRSS - have released
any new polls following the second July 30-31 Democratic presidential debate in Detroit.

In the two weeks after the first Democratic primary debate in Miami, the period between June 28
and July 13, six DNC-certified polls were released. After the second debate in Detroit, when
Rep. Gabbard had one of the strongest performances on the stage, only two certified polls were
released in the two weeks following her break-out appearance.

# polls # polls # polls #polls Total to

released in released in released in released in date
first week second week third week fourth week

Debate One 4 2 5 3 14

Debate Two 1 1 2 0 so far 4

2
No major news source released a national poll in the two week period following the second
debate, compared to five polls released by seven major news organizations after the first debate.
For example, CNN released DNC-certified polls on a regular monthly basis since March until
after the Detroit debate (which CNN co-hosted) when they inexplicably stopped releasing polls.

Following the first debate in Miami, 14 of the DNC’s qualified polling organizations released
numbers, and four of these organizations released ​multiple​ polls. This contrasts starkly with the
almost dormant activity of these same polling organizations following the second debate.

The delayed release of polls so long after the debates is particularly harmful to candidates with
lower name-recognition. Delayed poll releases are an advantage for high-name recognition
candidates such as Vice President Joe Biden and Sens. Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and
Kamala Harris.

DNC’s polling criteria is unknown; disadvantages Rep. Gabbard

In addition, the campaign is concerned that the DNC has not made their criteria for poll selection
known and, in some cases, the DNC is relying on inferior, less accurate polls.

As of Aug 20th, Rep. Gabbard has qualified for two DNC-certified polls, ​but she has exceeded
2% support in 24 uncertified non-qualifying polls since June 28​ (as reported by Real Clear
Politics and FiveThirtyEight).

Rep. Gabbard’s qualifying/non-qualifying polls above 2% since June 28th

DNC-Qualifying Polls Over 2% Since June 28th

1. New Hampshire (​CBS/YouGov​) 2% (July 2019)

2. National (​CNN/SSRS​) 2% (July 2019)

Non Qualifying Polls 2% and Over Since June 28th (national and early states only)
(Currently 24)
1. National (​Harvard/Harris​) 2% (July 2019)
2. National (​Emerson​) 2% (July 2019)
3. National (​Economist/YouGov​) 2% (July 2019)
4. New Hampshire (​Change Research/PollerCoaster​) 2% (July 2019)
5. South Carolina (​Change Research/PollerCoaster​) 2% (July 2019)
6. New Hampshire (​603/Change Research​) 3% (July 2019)
7. National (​ABC News/Washington Post​) (July 2019) (*qualifying poll but
“non-qualifying” question; received 2% in open-ended question)

3
 8. National (​The Economist/YouGov​) 2% (July 24th 2019)
9. National (​YouGov/PerryUdem​) 2% (July 29th)
10. National (​ChangeResearch​) 2% (July 29th 2019)
11. National (​Echelon Insights​) 2% (July 29th 2019)
12. National (​The Economist/YouGov​) 2% (July 31st 2019)
13. National (​HarrisX​) 3% (August 2nd 2019)
14. National (​HarrisX​) 2% (July 30th 2019)
15. National (​HarrisX​) 2% (July 31st 2019)
16. New Hampshire (​Suffolk University/Boston Globe​) 3% (August 6th 2019)
17. National (​The Economist/YouGov​) 3% (August 7th 2019)
18. National (​ChangeResearch​) 2% (August 8th 2019)
19. New Hampshire (​Gravis Marketing​) 5% (August 13th 2019)
20. National (​YouGov/The Economist​) 2% (August 14th 2019)
21. Iowa (​ChangeResearch​) 2% (August 15th, 2019)
22. South Carolina (​ChangeResearch​) 2% (August 15, 2019)
23. Nevada (​Gravis Marketing​) 2% (August 20th 2019)
24. National (​The Economist/YouGov​) 2% (August 21st 2019)

While conventional wisdom might assume DNC-certified polls are more accurate than
non-qualifying polls, this is not always true. Many non-qualifying polls are more accurate than
the DNC’s preferred polls (​Sources: American Research Group​ ​and FiveThirtyEight​).

For example, Rep. Gabbard had 3% support Suffolk and Emerson polls (both rated B+). These
polls are not approved by the DNC, but received higher accuracy ratings on FiveThirtyEight than
some other DNC-approved polls, such as NPR (rated B-). In addition, Rep. Gabbard met the 2%
threshold in the Politico/Morning Consult poll, which is non-qualifying and is rated the same as
the DNC-“certified” NPR poll. The DNC also “certifies” a poll taken by SurveyMonkey, which
received a “D-” accuracy rating, just because the pollster was commissioned by NBC, which is a
DNC-approved sponsor.

We are calling on the DNC to certify the Boston Globe/Suffolk University poll and the
Economist/YouGov polls, which show that Congresswoman Gabbard increased her support to
3%, as well as the Post and Courier poll, conducted by the highest-circulation newspaper in
South Carolina. There is no justifiable reason for the DNC to exclude these polls, or polls from
other credible organizations.

Journalists with questions should reach out to ​press@tulsi2020.com​ and ​cullen@tulsi2020.com​.

4
Additional background and commentary from Michael Tracey
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/08/21/gabbard_victimized_by_dncs_dubious_de
bate_criteria_141055.html 
 
Tulsi Gabbard is on the verge of being excluded from the next Democratic presidential debate on
the basis of criteria that appear increasingly absurd.

1. Take, for instance, her poll standing in New Hampshire, which currently places Gabbard at
3.3% support, according to the RealClearPolitics average as of Aug. 20. One might suspect that
such a figure would merit inclusion in the upcoming debates -- especially considering she’s
ahead of several candidates who have already been granted entry, including Cory Booker, Amy
Klobuchar, Beto O’Rourke, and Andrew Yang.

2. But a poll sponsored by the newspaper with the largest circulation in New Hampshire (the
Globe recently surpassed the New Hampshire Union Leader there) does not count, per this
cockamamie criteria.

3. A South Carolina poll published Aug. 14 by the Post and Courier placed Gabbard at 2%. One
might have again vainly assumed that the newspaper with the largest circulation in a critical
early primary state would be an “approved” sponsor per the dictates of the DNC, but it is not.
Curious.

4. But Gabbard has polled at 2% or more in six additional YouGov polls -- except those polls are
sponsored by The Economist, not CBS. Needless to say, The Economist is not a “sponsoring
organization,” per the whims of the DNC. It may be one of the most vaunted news organizations
in the world, and YouGov may be a “qualified” polling firm in other contexts, but the DNC has
chosen to exclude The Economist’s results for reasons that appear less and less defensible.
 

About Tulsi Gabbard

Tulsi is the first female combat veteran to ever run for U.S. president and, along with Tammy
Duckworth, one of the first two female combat veterans elected to Congress. Currently a major
in the Army National Guard, she has served for more than 16 years and deployed twice to the
Middle East.

5
Tulsi is a Democrat and was first elected to Congress in 2012. She has served there for more than
6 years, including on the Homeland Security, Foreign Affairs, and Armed Services Committees.

Tulsi was Vice Chair of the Democratic National Committee from 2013 until she resigned in
2016 to endorse Bernie Sanders in his bid for President.

Tulsi’s campaign for president is powered completely by people. She does not accept campaign
contributions from corporations, lobbyists, or any political action committees.

Tulsi was born a US citizen on April 12, 1981 in American Samoa. When she was two years old,
her family moved to Hawaii, where she grew up. As is typical of many residents of Hawaii, she
is of mixed ethnicity, including Asian, Caucasian, and Polynesian descent.

More Information and Updates from Tulsi Gabbard:

TULSI2020.com
https://twitter.com/tulsigabbard
https://facebook.com/tulsigabbard
https://medium.com/@tulsigabbard
https://youtube.com/tulsigabbard
https://instagram.com/tulsigabbard