Sei sulla pagina 1di 8

Team Building Worksop

Facilitator’s Guide

© NL Buckley 1984–2018 info@facet5.com.au


TeamScape Team Building Workshop: Facilitator’s Guide 2

Contents
Introduction 3

Planning a team building workshop 4

Sample workshop agendas 6

© NL Buckley 1984–2018
TeamScape Team Building Workshop: Facilitator’s Guide 3

Introduction

This guide has been written to help Accredited Facet5 Users design and run
a team building event using Facet5 and TeamScape data. It assumes a good working
knowledge of Facet5, but little experience of Teambuilding, Facilitation or Training.
The aim is to provide sufficient information to run such an event for the first time.

Those of you who are experienced will have your own ideas TeamScape Facilitators Pack
and preferences for designing a team event, and will have
a full repertoire of exercises and techniques that you use to The TeamScape Facilitators Pack consists of:
good effect.
Documents
We hope what follows will enable you to add value and
depth to your designs through the incorporation of Facet5 • TeamScape: Facilitator’s Guide to the Model
and TeamScape data. • Sample TeamScape Report

• Understanding your TeamScape Report:


Participant’s Guide

• TeamScape Team Building Workshop: Facilitator’s Guide

PowerPoint presentations

• Facet5 Line Dancing

• Facet5 TeamScape

© NL Buckley 1984–2018
TeamScape Team Building Workshop: Facilitator’s Guide 4

Planning a team building workshop

When to use TeamScape Get a good understanding of who and


TeamScape is a valuable application for team leaders,
what you are dealing with
managers, trainers and consultants who are already familiar Healthy skepticism is a very usual response from people
with the Facet5 model of individual differences, and who who have never participated in a team building exercise
wish to improve the functioning of interdependent groups [or who have experienced a poorly designed and managed
of people. event]. A similar response is also not uncommon when the
inclusion of personality data is proposed. As a result the
Learn how to produce and interpret majority of team building facilitators will caution against
a TeamScape Report undertaking such an activity without first ensuring that all
the individuals have been properly briefed. When it comes
The first document in the Facilitators Pack, entitled to using Facet5, or any other personality measure, good
TeamScape: a Facilitators Guide to the Model, should practice dictates that everyone who has completed such
be read before continuing with this Guide. It is a detailed an instrument should receive quality 1:1 feedback from
document and worth reading carefully. It includes: an accredited person, and be issued with their individual
• discussion of what constitutes a team profiles. If the data is to be used in a team build then this
should take place prior to the event. This not only gives
• the rationale behind the TeamScape model individuals the opportunity to evaluate whether their profile
• how to administer a TeamScape project is a fair reflection of themselves, but also gives them
a grasp of the Facet5 model and language that will
• how to administer the on-line TeamScape 360 be used during the team build session. In our experience
• the structure and content of a TeamScape report. individuals are left feeling far more comfortable with the
whole prospect of the team event if the feedback session
Define the purpose of the team build also includes the following:

There are many varied and valid reasons for undertaking • the aims and objectives of the team event
a team building exercise and it is important that the aims • the tone of the event [i.e. supportive, non threatening,
and objectives of a specific team build are clear in your mind confidential, fun, practical and constructive]
before planning how best to proceed. In this way you can
tailor the agenda appropriately. • a confidential discussion of the individual’s perception
of how well the team currently operates and any issues
This is best achieved by talking to the person who has that they feel are affecting team performance
requested the event. Very often the responses will be vague
but the overall objectives should be clear from the outset. • information on how the Facet5/TeamScape data will
For example, the objectives for the Two-day Workshop be used
agenda we recommend later, were defined by the Manager • if the TeamScape 360 is being included, then now would
as being: be the time to explain the process and alert individuals
‘We are a relatively new team and it is important that to expect their on-line invitation.
we get to know each other better and become clearer about
how to work well together to achieve our objectives as Numbers of people
a Division’. Further discussion revealed that there was This gets at the core of what constitutes a team. While it
some nervousness and a high degree of skepticism within would be usual to have more than 2–3 people, the basic
the team about the value of a team building exercises. principles are equally applicable to two or three people
working together as to a larger team of 12 or so. We have
been involved in a Team Build for 70 people, but this is rare!
Facet5 can produce TeamScape reports for a maximum of
30 people. This limit is due to the difficulties of representing
the data effectively. For larger numbers you should divide
the group into two or more Projects.

© NL Buckley 1984–2018
TeamScape Team Building Workshop: Facilitator’s Guide 5

On-site or off-site location Use of a 360° review process


• Most team build facilitators would agree that it is easier Inclusion of some form of 360° feedback process adds
to keep the team focused on the event if it is carried out significantly to the effectiveness of a team workshop.
away from the work place. The key issue here is often This is because it provides an external view over and above
one of cost and logistics. Although an off-site workshop that inferred by Facet5. We would recommend using at least
is more expensive in terms of the additional costs incurred one, and preferably both of the following to add value and
in delegate day rates, dinner, accommodation, etc., clarity to the whole process.
it is preferable in every other way. Specifically:
• The TeamScape 360 Questionnaire. Administered
• People are less accessible and thus less likely ‘online’ after the 1:1 briefing and prior to the Workshop.
to be interrupted or distracted by business issues
• A ‘live’ 360° exercise conducted during the event.
• The change of environment encourages people to look
We have included both processes in the two longer
at things from a different perspective
agendas. If this is impractical then we have found the ‘live’
• It is easier to create a more egalitarian environment option to be the most powerful by far. If you choose to use
without the trappings of power and authority the on-line 360 alone, then it is really important to brief
participants to provide as much free text commentary
• People can relax, socialise and get to know one
as possible when completing the questionnaire.
another better.

If this is not possible then it is best to formally agree that Designing the team build
individuals will not be interrupted for the duration of the
event and will, to all intents and purposes, be unavailable Use the pre-workshop sessions to gather as much
and away from their desks and telephones. If this is made information as you can. This will enable you to design the
clear before the event then individuals can make the team build to meet the overall objective and cover any
necessary arrangements. performance concerns and issues that have already been
raised. You also have Facet5 and TeamScape data on the
team. Use this to help you understand how individuals
Adjust your agenda and approach
and the team are likely to respond and behave during the
to fit the time available event and to think about your own facilitation style and fit
It is important to know how much time the team is able with the Team.
to commit to for the event. The usual objectives for most
When designing a team build for the first time it is helpful
team building events is to allow the team to come away with
to think of team effectiveness as comprising two main
a better understanding of what they do well and not so well,
components or elements. The first of these is best described
and to create some clear action plans for improving their
as the ‘What’ or ‘Task’ element of effectiveness. Most teams
individual and team effectiveness. If this is the case then
are brought together to perform a specific role and will
it is difficult to envisage much progress being made in less
have goals and objectives that they need to achieve.
than a good half day. In addition, it is worth remembering
These should be clear and agreed and will usually be
that teams need time to ‘tune in’ to the event and to adjust
understood in terms of tasks and deliverables. Ideally,
to the rare luxury of having time to think and reflect on
Team builds include a discussion of such things and will
how they work. They will need time to create the right
seek to ensure clarity and agreement about what the team
atmosphere where people feel relaxed and comfortable.
has to achieve and deliver.
It is difficult to achieve momentum and create and maintain
such an environment if time is short. If, as is often the case, The second element is best described as the ’Process’
the event is also seen as an opportunity for team members or the ‘How’ element. This refers to the way in which tasks
to get to know one another better, then it is advisable to are undertaken and the quality of interpersonal interactions
include some ‘down time’ for socialising in the agenda. and behaviours. People have much more difficulty in
At the very least this can be achieved by arranging for describing and explaining this aspect of team effectiveness
people to meet up for a drink and/or a meal after the event. and this is where Facet5 really comes into its own.
In our experience, teams gain most from events that span
two days and include a compulsory overnight stay, which
includes a team dinner.

The key barriers here are typically cost and logistics.


Use the objectives to help you determine how much time
is required and encourage your client to allow as much
time as they can for the event. We include three example
agendas – a half-day, a full-day and a two-day workshop.

© NL Buckley 1984–2018
TeamScape Team Building Workshop: Facilitator’s Guide 6

Sample workshop agendas

We have included three sample workshops. They differ The most striking difference is that the Two-day Workshop
in terms of length, depth and complexity, but share includes practical, experiential team activities that are
a consistency of approach based on the premise that: interesting, fun and informative. At a basic level these add
TeamScape should to be used in the context of why the value to any workshop by:
team exists, what are they there to achieve, and how best
• creating a positive atmosphere
they can do that, given the individual makeup of the teams.
• allowing physical movement
The workshops have evolved over the years and are
a product of several people’s ideas and experiences. • keeping people awake after lunch!
We are grateful to our colleagues, at t-three and Kate
• helping people to relax
Woodley in particular, who have shared their knowledge
and experience with us. • promoting laughter

A set of Facilitator Notes has been attached to each of • breaking down social barriers
the agendas. The purpose and objective of each session
• energising and motivating people
is provided, along with detailed notes on how to run the
exercises and manage the session. Although there is • helping people to ‘think outside the box’
duplication each agenda has a full set of notes for ease
• helping people to get to know one another
of use.
When they are also carefully observed and debriefed well,
The Agendas do not include specific time slots but give
then they offer valuable perspectives on team and individual
an indication of how much time you should allow for each
behaviours that compliment and reinforce the messages
session or exercise. All timings are approximate and
and lessons of the workshop.
on the generous side. Facilitators may prefer to work
to a more precise timetable, but it is always better to retain You may feel that it is worth sacrificing some of the
some flexibility. All teams are different and it is difficult content of the shorter workshops to allow space to include
to predict how a team is going to perform on the day. such activities.
They vary in numbers and in the length of time they need,
or are prepared to put in to, any one session. You will need
to respond to what you are observing and to use your
judgment about how far to ‘push’ a team to work
on a particular aspect of the workshop, how much time
to allow for breaks and what to include or leave out.

The Agendas and Notes have been written for a team


of eight people. Many of the exercises require you to divide
the team in to groups or pairs. You will need to adjust the
groupings to suit the size of the team and the time slot
available. Be sure to plan and prepare for this ahead of time,
as such changes can significantly effect the timings and
smooth running of the workshop.

Use the agendas as they are or mix sessions and include/


exclude exercises to suit the purpose of the event.
Time will dictate how much you can include in a workshop.
This is usually the most challenging part, but you should
be able to create some lively and constructive workshops
based on our suggestions. The table on page 7 shows
the relative advantages and disadvantages of the three
workshops and their uses.

© NL Buckley 1984–2018
TeamScape Team Building Workshop: Facilitator’s Guide 7

Half-day Workshop One-day Workshop Two-day Workshop

Workshop duration Workshop duration Workshop duration


• 4 to 4.5 hours • 8 hours • 2 consecutive days

Main advantages Main advantages Main advantages


• Includes all the main components • Includes all the main components The same as the One-day Workshop, plus:
• Minimum budget • Some ‘getting to know you better’ time • Includes highly interactive experiential
• Duration • Includes ‘on-screen’ presentation of data team activities

• Tone is ‘strictly business’ • Linking team data to current and future • Learning and impact is greater

• Does not require internet access during effectiveness • Benefits longer lasting
the workshop • Extra emphasis on feedback and the • Experience is more enjoyable and
contribution of the individual memorable
• More flexibility with the timing and
content.
• More time for action planning and
ensuring that progress is monitored

Main disadvantages Main disadvantages Main disadvantages


• Time has to be very tightly managed • A larger budget and time investment • Cost are usually higher
• A lot of information for teams to absorb • The pace needs to be kept up if all • Requires teams to take 2 full days out
in a short time sessions and exercises are included of their work schedule
• Short discussions and de-briefing in full • More preparation time for the facilitator
• Action Planning is limited to two areas • Action planning is usually limited • More challenging for the facilitator and
to four areas the team
• The tone is less positive
• Little or no time for ‘fun’ and experiential
• Less interaction. No simulation, team activities
‘fun’ or ‘getting to know you’ time
• The graphic and dynamic nature of the
web data is lost

Suitable uses Suitable uses Suitable uses


• As part of a larger team event • Established teams that have worked • All teams where teamworking
• Newly formed teams that have not together for more than three months is paramount to success
worked together for long • Teams that need to improve their • Underperforming teams
• Whole department or function events – teamwork skills or are underperforming • Work groups where communication
when the focus is the whole team, rather is poor, relationships are strained
than individuals or stress and negativity is the norm
• Teams that are curious about their
results but have no real issues

© NL Buckley 1984–2018

Potrebbero piacerti anche