Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
I'age No.
3.1- General
3.2- Evaluation of Seismic Design Forces for Equivalent Static Analysis
3.2.1- Seismic Hazard and Zoning Coefficient - Z
3.2.2- hnportance Factor - 1
3.2.3- Dynamic Coefficient - S
System Coefficient- K
3.2.4- S~I-uctural
3.2.5- Total Weiglit of Buildings and Structures - \'I'
3.2.6- influence of Soil and Foundation Conditions
3.3- Dish-ibution of Seismic Forces
3.4- Mcthoti of lly~iamicTinie History Analysis
REFERNCES ... 40
-11-
CHAPTER 1 - SCOPE AND PURPOSE
l.l- This code provides design and constrnction reqmrements for an eaithqnake
resistant buildings, lowers, chimneys and similar slrnctures.
The method specified do not cover nuclear power plants, large dams, and sim.ilai·
installations which require special site and structural investigations.
-1-
CHAPTER 2 - PRINCIPLES OF EARTHQliAKE- RESISTANT DESIGN
1l1e basic concept of the requirements provided in this code is that complete
protection against total damage is not economically feasible for all types of buildings
and structures. This concept is fulfilled by the following criteria:
a) 1l1e structure should withstand, without any structural and non-structural damage,
the effects of slight seismic motion.
b) The structure should withstand, with limited non-structural damage and limited
non-linear behaviour of stn1ctural members, the effects of moderate seismic motion
(design eruthquake).
·c) The stiucture should not collapse under sever or maximum expected earthquake.
For better earthquake resistance, it is necessaiy that buildings and structures have
simple fo1ms, in both pla11 and elevation, and of structural clements which resist
horizontal seismic actions be ananged in such a way that torsional effects are
minimized. Non symmeu-ical distribution of volumes, masses and stiffnesses in
buildings should be avoided in order to control torsional effects.
Generally, the design and construction of buildings and structures with in-egular or
complicated layout shall be avoided due to the potential occurrence of c1itical
additional stresses in the regions of discontinuities. \Vhen these requirements cannot
be met, the structure shall be separated by seismic joints, each part having an adequate
shape and a proper distribution of volumes, masses and rigidities. Otherwise proper
considerations of inegnlarities should be taken, such as by pe1forrmng appropriate
dynamic analysis.
The sti·uctural system should be clearly defined so that rational analysis can be
applied. In computing earthquake response of a bnilding, the influence of not only
structural systems, but also non-structural elements (infill walls, partitions, windows_
etc.) should be considered as well.
2.4- Ductility
TI1c strnctmal system and its structural elements should have adequate strength a11d
ductility for the applied seismic actions. Structural elements which have sufficient
ductility are capable of absorbing energy. Special attention should be given to the
brittleness of structural elements such as shear failure, joint fracture, buckling, bond
failure and anchorage failure.
2.5- Deformations
8 1 , 82 - total lateral displacements of the two parts of the building under the
seismic action (see clause 4.8). For buildings of Class l, they should be
detennined by dynamic response analysis.
-4-
CHAPTER 3 - EVALUATION OF SEISl\1IC ACT! ONS
3.1- General
1e
)e 3.1.1- The seismic analysis of structures shall take the dynamic properties of the
structure into consideration either by dynamic analysis or by equivalent static
analysis. A dynamic analysis is highly recommended for specific stTuc11ires such
as slender high-rise buildings and structures with inegularities of geometry or
mass distribution or rigidity dist1ibution.
3.1.2- Seismic design forces shall be applied at points where masses me assumed to be
concentrated.
The actual mass dist ribution may be substituted by a dishibution which simplifies
the analysis without affecting appreciably the final results (mass concentration at floor
levels in multistorey buildings; mass concentrations at an adequate number of
equidistant levels in tall constructions like chimneys, towers, etc.)
For structural desi f:,'11, the directions of seismic actions in horizontal plane should be
taken at least in two 011hogonal directions
Cantilevers and structures in which vertical seismic effects are significant, should
be analyzed in the ve11ical d irection taking into account these effects .
.U.3- The masses used for analysis have to correspond to the dead .ind probable live
loads.
For different Classes of buildings as defined in 3.2.2, the probable live load shall be
taken as 50% for sn·uctures of Class II and 25 °/o for stn1ctures of Class 111and Cl ass
IV, of floor live loads determined by the existing regulations,
For structures with significant live load such as (\Varehouses, Silos, Libraries.
Storage rooms and similar structures), the seismic design forces should be determined
for the most unfavorable combination of maximum, and I or minimum nctuil i loading.
Live loads of cranes should not be considered for detenninatio:n of seismic desi1,ri1
forces.
The total horizontal seismic design force acting on buildings and strnctures shall be
detennined according to the following fonnula., but shall not be less than (0.02W).
v = z.r.s.K.w ................................ . (3-1)
\Vb ere:
The evaluation of seismic hazal'd in different seismic areas for the design of
buildings and structures shall be perfonned according to the seismic zoning map of
Iraq (Appendix A).
Zone z
r 0.05
]] 0.07
---
Ill 0.09
\\