Sei sulla pagina 1di 6

CFA Guidance Note:

Procedure for site testing construction fixings - 2012


1.1 Terminology and notation

In this Guidance Note the terms listed are taken to have the following meanings (Some terms and notation are defined
within the text):
Note: Terminology adopted here is that used in in BS 8539:2012 and similar to that used in the European context e.g.
Eurocodes, and in particular in CEN Technical Specifications [CEN TS 1992-4-1] which detail design methods for
6
anchors with ETA . Some of this terminology is different to that traditionally used in the fixings industry. Key terms used
here are defined below, (the traditional reference is shown in brackets). A key difference to be aware of is that loads are
now referred to as either “actions” – loads applied from the fixture – or “Resistances” – the ability of the anchors to
5
withstand actions. For more on the terminology see . In the definitions referred to below the notation N is used for tensile
actions or resistances, V would be substituted for the same term in shear.
Anchor (Fixing)
Manufactured device for achieving a connection between the fixture and the base material. (In CEN TS 1992-4-1
the terms “anchor” and “fastener” are used interchangeably.) BS 8539 uses only the term “Anchor”, here we use
both anchor and fixing.
Anchorage
The combination of anchor, a fixture, e.g. a bracket, and the immediately surrounding base material on which the
anchor depends in order to transfer the relevant forces. (In CEN TS 1992-4-1 the term “fastening” is used.)
Allowable Resistance (Allowable Load), NR,all
Safe working load determined from tests carried out on site when no Recommended Resistance is published by
[3]
the manufacturer. In designs carried out to Eurocode 2 there is no equivalent term see .
Characteristic Resistance (Characteristic Load), NRk
Resistance derived as the 5% fractile of the mean ultimate resistance when determined from a series of tests
based on a 90% probability that 95% of all anchors will exceed the characteristic value. In some ETAGs it may be
derived by other means, e.g. by empirical calculation depending on the mode of failure.
NRk,ETA is the characteristic resistance quoted in the ETA for the relevant base material.
Characteristic Action (Applied Load), NSk
Actual load to be applied to the anchor according to the design. A term in common usage is “unfactored load”.
Designer
Person with overall responsibility for the design of the structure which includes the anchorage.
Design action, NSd
Sometimes referred to as the “Factored load” it is the action determined by the application of a partial safety
factor, γF, to the characteristic action. There was no traditional equivalent to this term.
Installer
Person or organisation who installs the specified anchors or the test anchors.
Masonry unit
Individual brick, block or stone within a masonry wall.
Recommended Resistance (Recommended Load), Nrec
The load which may be applied to the anchor as quoted by the manufacturer for a specific base material. In
[3]
designs carried out to Eurocode 2 there is no directly equivalent term see .
Ultimate Resistance (Failure load) NRu
Failure load determined in a test (Mean ultimate resistance, NRu,m, is the average from a series of tests)
Specifier
Person or organisation who designs the connection between the fixture and the substrate and is responsible for
the selection and specification of the anchor.
Tester Person or organisation who tests anchors

Loads in tests:
Np tensile load applied in a proof load test
Ntest tensile test load applied in preliminary tests
NRu,m mean ultimate tensile resistance recorded in a series of tests
Nu,ave average tensile failure load recorded in preliminary tests
Nu,low lowest tensile failure load recorded in preliminary tests
N1st,m load at first movement

PROCEDURE FOR SITE TESTING CONSTRUCTION FIXINGS – 2012 (07 12 12) 2


CFA Guidance Note:
Procedure for site testing construction fixings - 2012
2 SCOPE
BS 8539 outlines the test regimes (number of tests, test load, assessment of results) which need to be satisfied to
achieve the appropriate objectives. These are summarised below. This GN gives the details of how tests should be
carried out: equipment, how loads are applied, how movement may be monitored, reaction spacings, etc. Some
elements of the recommendations of BS 8539 are repeated here to provide a single reference.
This Guidance Note covers the procedures for applying Ultimate, Preliminary or Proof Loads in concrete and masonry
materials. Tests in the tensile direction are covered in the main body of the document. Tests in shear are not usually
needed as shear performance is generally limited by the material strength of either the structure or the anchor. They may
be needed when fixing to low strength masonry. Procedures for testing in shear are covered in Appendix 1.

3 PURPOSE OF TESTS, TEST REGIMES AND ASSESSMENT OF RESULTS


Tests for anchors on site may be required for two distinct purposes.
A) To determine the suitability of a fixing and the Allowable Resistance of an anchor in the case where no manufacturer’s
data is available for the specific base material concerned, see 3.1, or
B) To validate the quality of installation of anchors used on the job, i.e. Proof tests , see 3.2. Proof tests are not generally
recommended for assessing the suitability of fixings for use in a particular base material, i,e, purpose A above, except in
7
cases where tests as prescribed in 3.1 cannot be carried out, e.g. anchors used for seasonal decorations . In such cases
proof tests should be carried out on 100% of the fixings of a project.
Site tests are not required for objective A) above in cases where an anchor with an ETA is used and the base material
satisfies the criteria of the ETA.
Site tests are not required for objective b) above in cases where an anchor with an ETA is used and it is installed, as
required in the ETA, by a competent person working under supervision.

3.1 Tests regimes for determining Allowable Resistance.


Tests to determine Allowable Loads are called up in BS 8539 in Clause 9.2 for two conditions, Anchors with or without
ETA, and for each there are two approaches, these four approaches are first summarised in 3.1.1 and described in
detail in 3.1.2. NOTE: The test procedures for all regimes are detailed in section 4.
3.1.1 Test regimes for determining Allowable Resistance - SUMMARY:

Anchors with ETA


(where the base material of the application is within the category of the ETA
but does not comply in terms of strength and/or dimensions)
Test to BS 8539 Annex B.2.2
See 3.1.2 a) and b) below

This allows either:

Test to relevant ETAG Test to BS 8539 Annex B.2.2.1


Test > 15 anchors to failure OR Test 5 to 15 anchors to failure
NRk = .5 (alt .6*) x ave of lowest 5 results NRk1 from statistical analysis
See 3.1.2.1 below. (*ETAG 014) See 3.1.2.2 below

These two approaches will give different results but both on the safe side. The ETAG approach potentially requires more
tests so will take more time and cost more. In the BS 8539 alternative approach, the basis of the statistical analysis of the
results means that the larger the number of anchors tested the higher the resulting allowable resistance is likely to be.

Anchors without ETA


Test to BS 8539 Annex B.2.3
See 3.1.2.c) below

This allows either:


Test to BS 8539 Annex B.2.3.1 Test to BS 8539 Annex B.2.3.2
Preliminary test procedure Test > 5 anchors to failure.
Test > 5 anchors to a test load, Ntest. OR NRk1 derived from statistical analysis
NR,all derived from simplified approach See 3.1.2.4 below
See 3.1.2.3 below

PROCEDURE FOR SITE TESTING CONSTRUCTION FIXINGS – 2012 (07 12 12) 3


CFA Guidance Note:
Procedure for site testing construction fixings - 2012
Of these two approaches the CFA recommends the “Preliminary test procedure” as it requires fewer tests and is less
likely to involve damaging the base material as the initial tests are taken only to a test load and tests to failure of all
samples are only required if any of those fails to reach the required test load. The results from the alternative approach
are more likely to be an accurate assessment of the anchor performance but may cause more damage. Again the two
approaches will give different results and, in the tests taken to failure the more tests are carried out the more accurate
the results are likely to be due to the statistical benefits of a larger sample size.
Tests under this heading are not usually required for anchors to be used in concrete as BS 8539 recommends that only
anchors with ETA should be used and full performance will be stated in the ETA. They may be required for anchors to be
used in concrete if for some reason no anchors with ETA are available on the market or if the condition of the concrete
gives reason to believe that performance quoted in the ETA is unlikely to be achieved. They are therefore normally
expected to be required only for anchors to be used in masonry as outlined below.

3.1.2 Test regimes for determining Allowable Resistance – DETAILED EXPLANATIONS:


a) Where the proposed anchor carries an ETA for the category of masonry of the job and that masonry conforms to
the qualifications of the ETA in terms of strength and dimensions. i.e. the masonry units have a nominal strength at least
that quoted in the ETA and their dimensions the same as ort larger than those quoted in the ETA, then site tests are not
needed and the anchor can be selected using the load data quoted within the ETA.
b) Where the proposed anchor carries an ETA for the category of masonry of the job but that masonry does not
conform to the qualifications of the ETA in terms of strength and dimensions. i.e. the masonry units have a nominal
strength lower than that quoted in the ETA OR their dimensions are not as large as those quoted in the ETA, then tests
should be carried out to EITHER:
- the test regime outlined for Job-site tests in the relevant ETAG, (see BS 8539 Annex B.2.2) see 3.1.2.1. below
or
- the test regime detailed in BS 8539 Annex B.2.2.1 see 3.1.2.2 below
c) Where there is no anchor available on the market which carries a relevant ETA the tests called for in BS 8539
Annex B.2.3 should be carried out as long as the proposed anchors are of a type approved by the manufacturer for use
in the category of base material involved. Within this Clause there are two possible approaches.
The test regime described in 3.1.2.3 below relates to BS 8539 Annex B.2.3.1 where it is referred to as “Tests for
allowable resistance (simplified approach)” but is traditionally referred to as “Preliminary Testing”.
The test regime was devised some years ago by the CFA to provide a test method which is on the safe side,
and would minimise both the number of tests required and – if possible – damage to the structure.
The test regime described in 3.1.2.4 below relates to BS 8539 Annex B.2.3.2 where it is referred to as “Tests for
allowable resistance (statistical approach)”.
This test regime is more traditional. It may, depending on how many tests are carried out, produce a more
accurate result than the Preliminary testing approach but is more likely to damage the structure. In common with
tests called for in Annex B.2.2.1 the larger the sample size the higher the result is likely to be.
Note: If for any reason an anchorage is to be made in concrete for which no anchor with an ETA is available (and no
other industry specific test regime is appropriate), or into concrete whose condition may give rise to concern regarding
anchor strength, then tests to either BS 8935 Clause 9.2 condition b) to Annex B.2.3.1 or Clause B.2.3.2 may be done.
Determination of Allowable Resistance.
For completeness and ease of use the regimes for determining allowable resistances are repeated from BS 8539,
together with the treatment of results, and for clarity the references for equations used in BS 8539 are retained.

3.1.2.1. Test regime – anchors with ETA – as ETAG


The regimes for anchors under this heading should be taken from the relevant ETAG. They are summarised below for
reference and comparison with other regimes outlined here.
The output from these test regimes is the Characteristic Resistance from which the Allowable Resistance is determined
by dividing the characteristic resistance by a partial safety factor, γF.

In the following ETAGs the basis of the tests is common:


Test at least 15 anchors to failure.
In assessing the results N1 = mean of the lowest 5 results

q ETAG 014 Plastic anchors for fixing of external thermal insulation composite systems with rendering.
Characteristic resistance, NRk = .6N1 < 1.5kN
q ETAG 020 Plastic anchors for multiple use in concrete or masonry for non-structural applications
Characteristic resistance, NRk = .5N1 < NRk,ETA* *(for the same category of material)
q ETAG 029 Metal injection anchors for use in masonry
Characteristic resistance, NRk = .5N1 < NRk,ETA* *(for the same category of material)

PROCEDURE FOR SITE TESTING CONSTRUCTION FIXINGS – 2012 (07 12 12) 4


CFA Guidance Note:
Procedure for site testing construction fixings - 2012
3.1.2.2. Test regime – anchors with ETA – to BS 8539 Annex B.2.2.1

Between 5 and 15 anchors are loaded carefully to failure.


For each tests record the load at first movement N1st, the failure load NRu, and the mode of failure (see 4.2)
For the series calculate the mean load at first movement N1st,m, the mean failure load NRu,m.

Determination of Allowable Resistance:

Characteristic resistance, NRk1 =NRu,m (1 – K·v) · β ≤ NRk,ETA (B.1)

where: the values of K are taken from standard statistical tables:


For 5 tests K = 3.4
For 10 tests K = 2.57
For 15 tests K = 2.33
v is the coefficient of variation of the failure loads, and is given by v = (s NRu,m) · 100%;
β is an influencing factor whose values are given in the approval document.
s is the standard deviation of failure loads about the mean value.
The design resistance, NRd is given by equation (B.2), from which the allowable resistance, NRall, is derived
using equation (B.3).

NRd = NRk1 γM (B.2)

NR,all = NRd γF ≤ N1st,m (B.3)

γM is given in the approval document.


γF = 1.35 for permanent actions, 1.5 for variable actions or 1.4 if the nature of the actions is unknown or they
are mixed.

3.1.2.3. Test regime – anchors without ETA – to BS 8539 Annex B.2.3.1 - “Preliminary Tests”.

Procedure Test 5 anchors to a load of Ntest = NSk · νtest (B.4)

Where NSk is the characteristic tensile action.


and νtest depends on the type of anchor being tested. Values for νtest are shown in Table 1 below.

It is essential that anchors used for preliminary tests are installed specifically for the tests and will not be used on the job.

If all 5 anchors hold the test load, see figure 1, then


Load
the characteristic action NSk, may be taken to be the
allowable resistance in this base material.

NR,all = NSk (B.5)


Ntest
+ + + + +
Test results
All 5 test anchors hold the load
Figure 1. All five anchors hold the test load satisfactorily. NSk

If any anchor fails to reach the test load then the situation
should be reviewed with the specifier. If the number of
anchors cannot readily be increased then the anchor Load
specification should be changed – options include
using the same type of anchor, but with a larger
diameter or increased embedment depth, or changing
to a different type of anchor. In either of these cases
the Preliminary tests will need to be repeated with the
Ntest
+ + + ++
new anchor. Test results
NSk
Figure 2. EXAMPLE TEST SERIES.
On initial test four anchors hold the required load
satisfactorily but one fails at a slightly lower load.

If the number of anchors being used can be readily increased then the following approach may be applied using the
same anchor type. This should only be contemplated if the failure is close to the required test load, e.g. NRu > 0.8 · Ntest.

PROCEDURE FOR SITE TESTING CONSTRUCTION FIXINGS – 2012 (07 12 12) 5


CFA Guidance Note:
Procedure for site testing construction fixings - 2012
Procedure following one failure before reaching Ntest

Load all five test anchors carefully to failure, if an anchor Load


moves during loading the tests should be halted at
+
approximately 1.0 mm movement to avoid damaging the
structure. The load at this point should be taken as the Ntest
+ + +
failure load, NRu,m, for that test. Test results +
Figure 3. EXAMPLE TEST SERIES cont’d.
The remaining anchors which held the test load (four in NSk
this example) are then carefully loaded to failure.

The new Allowable Resistance, NR,all , is then calculated as the lowest result from equations B.6 and B.7:

Average failure load, Nu,ave νave (B.6)

Lowest load, Nu,low νlow


(B.7)
Check also that NR,all ≤ N1st,m

Where the factors νave and νlow are shown in the table 1

Table 1. Factors used in preliminary tests

Application Anchor Factors to determine Factors to determine new


material test load, Ntest allowable resistance, NR,all
νtest νave νlow
Long term loading for Nylon* 5 7 5
general purposes All other 3 4 3
Short term loading for e.g. Nylon* 3 5 3
scaffold anchoring, All other 2 3 2
steeplejack anchoring
8
* Nylon anchors require higher factures due to the effects of creep .

Determining the Allowable Resistance, NR,all, from the test results: Figure 4. Finding average failure
load and Nu,ave νave
Load
+ Average Failure Load, Nu,ave
+ + +
Test results +
Nu,ave
NSk νave
The lowest of these is the new
Allowable Resistance, NR,all

Load
+ Lowest Failure Load, Nu,low
+ + +
+ Nu,low
νlow
NSk Figure 5. Finding lowest failure
load and Nu,low νlow
.

Load
+ Figure 6. Determining allowable
+ + + resistance from lowest result.

+
In this case the Nu,ave νave becomes the new
NSk “Allowable Resistance”, NR,all. It is inevitably
lower than the required “Characteristic action” so
more fixings will be needed.
PROCEDURE FOR SITE TESTING CONSTRUCTION FIXINGS – 2012 (07 12 12) 6
CFA Guidance Note:
Procedure for site testing construction fixings - 2012
If the number of anchors may be increased pro rata by, for instance, simply reducing the spacing between anchors, then
the new number of anchors required on the job, n’ comes from:

Revised number of anchors required

n’ = n0 · NSk NR,all (B.8)

Where n0 = number of anchors originally assumed


and n’ = number of anchors required with the Allowable Resistance NR.all

3.1.2.4. Test regime – anchors without ETA – to BS 8539 Annex B.2.3.2


Ultimate load tests with statistical analysis.

Between 5 and 15 anchors are loaded carefully to failure.


For each tests record the load at first movement N1st, the failure load NRu, and the mode of failure (see 4.2)
For the series calculate the mean load at first movement N1st,m, the mean ultimate load NRu,m.

Determination of Allowable Resistance:

Characteristic resistance, NRk1 =NRu,m (1 – K·v) · Ω ≤ NRk,ETA (B.9)

where: definitions of K, v and s are as section 3.1.2.2


v should not be greater than 30%
Ω is an adjustment factor based on conditions pertaining to the application and whose values should be
decided by the designer (or specifier). The following values are mentioned in BS 8539.
Ω = 0.8 for installation in wet substrate

Ω = 0.8 for the effect of temperatures above the service temperature range normally recommended by
the manufacturer.

Ω = 0.75 for rendered or plastered walls where the mortar joints are not visible or where positioning of
anchors cannot be guaranteed to be within the brick.
Where more than one of these conditions applies then all relevant factors should be multiplied together.
The allowable resistance, NR,all is given by equation (B.10).

NR,all = NRk1 ν ≤ N1st,m (B.10)

where ν is a global safety factor (to be chosen by the specifier) e.g. 2.5, which is the factor recommended in
BS 8539 for static and quasi static actions for anchors other than those of nylon for which higher factors should
be considered e.g. 5.0 .

3.2 Tests to validate the quality of installation – Proof tests


Tests to meet this objective are called up in BS 8539 in Clause 9.3 and the test regime outlined in BS 8539 Annex B.3.

The term “Proof load” as used here and in BS 8539 bears no relation to “Proof Load” tests carried out to ETAG 029
B.3.3.
BS 8539 recommends, in section B.3, that the level of Proof Load, Np is given by

Np = NSk · νP,test (B.11)


Where the level of the factor νP,test should be decided by the engineer responsible for the fixing specification.

BS 8539 recommends νP,test = 1.5 when > 2.5% of all anchors are tested and
= 1.25 when > 5% of all anchors are tested
νP,test should not exceed 1.5 x the manufacturer’s recommended resistance, Nrec, for the type
and size of fixing in the base material concerned at the same strength, if known, and
taking account of any spacing and/or edge distance reduction factors.
The minimum number of fixings to be proof tested should always be at least 2.5% and at least 3 of the total number of
anchors installed on a job. The minimum of 3 applies in any discrete area where different anchors may have been used,
the base material is different, the condition of the base material has been affected by weather conditions e.g. on a
different elevation or where anchors have been installed by different installation teams.

PROCEDURE FOR SITE TESTING CONSTRUCTION FIXINGS – 2012 (07 12 12) 7

Potrebbero piacerti anche