Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
assignment
Assignment guidelines
• The assignment should meet the word count (+10%) specified in the assessment brief.
Please refer to the guidance about ‘Word Count Requirements’ for further information.
• The assignment should be written in essay format. Six short essays to address each of
the scenarios will probably be most effective.
• Acknowledge any quotation from the published or unpublished works of other persons.
All references must be fully cited. (See section below on citing references, legislation,
legal cases and bibliographies for more information).
• There should be a declaration on the final page, which specifies the total number of
words. This excludes appendices, contents page, title page, bibliography and footnotes.
• The assignment should be submitted to the VLE by the date that you have been given.
• All submissions will be checked for plagiarism using software called ‘Turnitin’
Preparation
Start by reading through the questions carefully. It is important that you address the specific
question that has been set. It might be helpful to underline key words or phrases within the
questions. In reading the question summarise what it is addressing. For example, is it a
question about health and safety or about dismissal?
Read the following question (this is not one of the questions in your assignment):
The organisation requires all employees to fill in an expenses sheet that details any
expenses that they want to claim. Georgia recently attended a training course and was
asked to complete an expenses form. On the form she stated that she spent £73 on a train
fare, and £175 on a hotel room. However, her line manager knows that she drove to the
course, and it was only about 30 miles away and also knows that Georgia stayed with her
aunt overnight and did not stay in a hotel. Georgia is suspended on suspicion of fraud. The
line manager seeks your advice because he wants to dismiss Georgia.
You now need to turn to your course notes about dismissal. Here you will find that a key
piece of law is the Employment Rights Act 1996 and that the Acas Code of Practice:
Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures is relevant to dismissal. You will also find that there
is a need to investigate what has occurred, and hence will find that BHS v Burchell (1978)
is relevant.
Keeping with our example you now need to apply the law.
Firstly, the Employment Rights Act 1996 sets out the potentially fair reasons for dismissal.
One of these is conduct – and this seems to cover the situation that has arisen with Georgia.
Secondly, there is a need to follow the procedure set out in the Acas Code of Practice:
Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures. You need to advise the line manager about the
requirements from this procedure.
Thirdly, you can apply BHS v Burchell (1978). Here there is the need to have a reasonable
investigation, which leads to a reasonable conclusion of the guilt of Georgia. The decision to
dismiss, given the circumstances, then has to be reasonable.
In our example:
It appears that this is a conduct situation. Fraud could be gross misconduct, and hence this
could result in summary dismissal. Before making any decisions an investigation needs to be
carried out to understand if there are any errors in the line manager’s understanding of what
happened. If the investigation seems to suggest that Georgia has fraudulently claimed
expenses she must be invited to a disciplinary meeting. She must be invited in writing, and
told she can bring a colleague or a trade union representative with her. At the meeting she
must be given the opportunity to put her side of the story. Management should adjourn to
consider what to do. If she is dismissed she must be given the opportunity to appeal against
the dismissal.
To strengthen the credibility of your advice give some examples of the consequences for the
company if your advice is not followed (e.g. unfair dismissal claim, discrimination claim with
unlimited compensation, reputation of the company, unwanted media attention)
• Identity the main principles of discrimination law in recruitment and selection and in
employment (2.1)
• Explain how contracts of employment are established (2.2)
Know how to manage issues relating to pay and working time lawfully:
• Identify the major statutory rights workers have in the fields of pay, leave and working
time (4.1)
• Explain the major requirements of equal pay law (4.2)
• Explain major maternity, paternity and other family-friendly employment rights (4.3)
Be able to ensure that staff are treated lawfully when they are at work:
• Explain the main requirements of unfair dismissal law in respect of capability and
misconduct issues (6.1)
• Explain the scope of the right for employees to be accompanied at serious discipline
and grievance hearings (6.2)
In addition to the above, the following criteria will be used when marking your assignment:
Understanding of the legal issues
Clarity
• Has the student shown that s/he is competent to give employment law advice to line
managers?
• Is the advice clear and well explained?
• Is it in a format that would be understood by lay managers i.e those not legally
qualified
Presentation
When citing a reference in the text you only need to mention the author(s)’s surname and the
date of publication, all contained in brackets. For example, (Taylor, 1998).
Standard format for bibliographical entries is given below. Give as much of the following
information as possible/appropriate:
• publication date
• publisher
• place of publication
• if two or more have the same author and year, distinguish by using lower case letters
after the year, e.g.2005a, 2005b
• if you are referring to the general theme of a book, page numbers are not necessary.
When you are quoting or referring to figures or data, page numbers must be included
When citing references from the web, you need to specify the date of your visit to the site.
Legal citations
Being able to accurately cite the source you have used in your work is an important
academic skill. When you reference a case, you should not reference the book or website
where you read about it. You should just reference the case, as shown below.
Cases are normally referred to by way of the names of the parties concerned in the action.
So, where a court action is brought by somebody called Harriman (the Claimant) in dispute
with somebody called Martin (the Respondent), the case can be referred to as: Harriman
v Martin (said as Harriman and Martin) or
This tells you precisely where to find the case in the law library - Weekly Law Reports for
1962, volume 1, at page 739.
Your assignment will be marked by a tutor against the assessment criteria set out above.
Study the assessment criteria carefully and always review your work against this.