IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

: AT GADWAL

O.S.No. of 2017

BETWEEN:
Mr. Pedda Anjaneyulu S/o. Bajarappa, Age:35 Years, Occ:Agri.
R/o. Umithyala village of K.T.Doddi Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal Distrcit.

Advocate : B.Narasimhulu, Advocate, Gadwal.

….PLAINTIFF

V/S:

1. Smt.Ananthamma W/o. Bajarappa, Age: 50 Years, Occ:Agri

2. Mr.Chinna Anjaneylu S/o. Bajarappa, Age: 35 Years, Occ:Agri
3. Mr.Hanumanthu S/o. Bajarappa, Age:29 Years, Occ:Agri
4. Mr,Anjaneyulu S/o.V.Karrenna, Age: 39 years, Occ:Agri.
5. Bheemulamma W/o.Prathap,Age:35 years, Occ:Agri
All are R/o. Umithyala village of K.T.Doddi Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal Distrcit.
…..DEFENDANT’s

PLAINT FILED UNDER O. VII R.1&2 R/W U/S.26 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908.

The Plaintiff in the above case most respectfully submits, as follows:

1. That the plaintiff submits that the property mentioned at the foot of the plaint

herein after referred to as suit schedule property is the ancestral and joint family

property of plaintiff and defendant 1ST to 3rd and the defendant No. 4rd to 5th third

parties to suit schedule of the property and family of the plaintiff of the suit. The

defendant No.1st to 2nd are brothers of plaintiff and defendant No.1 is mother of

the plaintiff. That the Pedigree of the plaintiff and the defendant No.1 to 3 as

follows:

THE PEDIGREE.

MR.VARGU BADEGADU (HE & HIS WIFE DIED)

MR.LACHMADU (Son & HE & HIS WIFE DIED)

MR.BAJARAPPA (Son & HE DIED)

ANANTHAMMA P.ANJANEYULU C.ANJANEYULU HANUMANTHU

Wife&D.No.1 Son & Plaintiff Son & D.No.2 Son & D.No.3
2. That the plaintiff submits that the Suit Schedule of Property belongs to one

MR.VARGU BADEGADU, After demise of Mr.Vargu Badegadu, lived behind him as

Legal Heirs was MR.LACHMADU, he was also died, After demise of Mr.Lachmadu,

lived behind him as Legal Heirs was MR.Bajarappa, he was also died, After demise

of Mr.Vargu Badegadu, lived behind him as Legal Heirs is Plaintiff and Defendant

No.1 to 3, therefore the plaintiff and defendant No.1 to 3 enjoying the possession

over the suit schedule of property.

3. That the plaintiff submits that the plaintiff and defendant No.1 to 3 have been

enjoying the possession over the suit schedule property by amicable

understanding. But. There is no occurred partition in respect of the suit schedule

of the property.

4. That the plaintiff submits that the plaintiff was asked to the defendant No.1 to 3

for partition and separate possession in respect of the suit schedule of the

property on 01-06-2017 in the presence of village elders. But the defendant No.1

to 3 was denied and refused for partition and separate possession in respect of the

suit schedule of the property. Hence, the plaintiff was approached to the Revenue

Recording Authority (TAHASILDAR) at K.T.Doddi Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal

District for the purpose of obtain and same references the Revenue Records in

respect of herein said survey number dated on 02-06-2017 and 03-07-2017. And

the Tahasildar had issued certified copies of the Khasra Pahani(1954-1955) on 03-

07-2017,and Pahanies(1991-92,1992-93,1994-95,1996-97,1999-2000,2002-

03,2005-06,) on 07-06-2017. The same C.C. of Khasra Pahani and Pahanies are

filed herewith for kind perusal by this Hon’ble Court.

5. That the plaintiff submits that on dated 07-06-2017 when the plaintiff obtained

the Revenue Records from the Revenue Recording Authority. The plaintiff was

known about the defendant No.4 to 5 names has reflecting in the Revenue

Records in respect of the Suit schedule of Property. Those entries are completely

against the public policy in Revenue Records. Hence the plaintiff file this suit for

cancel the entries in the Revenue Records (1B-forms of the R.O.R. (2) and
 Pahanies (2), these are relevant to the defendant No.4 to 5). The same C.C. of 1B-

forms of the R.O.R. (2) is filed herewith for kind perusal by this Hon’ble Court.

6. The Plaintiff submits that the above said Defendant No.4 to 5 of the Revenue

Records is not bind by the plaintiff and the defendant No. 4 to 5 is not bind on the

plaintiff. Both of The defendants are colluded each other and try to grab the

plaintiff share of the property. Hence this suit.

7. That the plaintiff submits that the cause of action arose at Umithyala village of

K.T.Doddi Mandal where the plaintiff has demanded the defendant No.1 to 3 for

partition of the suit land by mets and bounds on 01-06-2017. When the plaintiff

was known about the defendant No.4 to 5 names has reflecting in the Revenue

Records in respect of the Suit schedule of Property dated on 07-06-2017, The

place of cause of action and the suit schedule of the property situated at

Umithyala village of K.T.Doddi Mandal, which is within the jurisdiction of the

Hon’ble court.

8. That the plaintiff submits that the plaintiff:

1. Relief for partition: As per the valuation certificate issued by the Sub-

Register Office, Gadwal. The suit schedule of the property is valued at

Rs.______________/- per Acre, that the suit schedule of the property total

value comes to Rs, ____________/- on which 1/4th of the plaintiff share is

Rs.____________/- on which 3/4th value comes to Rs.____________/-, up on

which Court fee of Rs_______________ is payable u/s 34(1) of the A.P.C.F.

AND S.V. ACT, 1956. But the suit schedule land property is in joint

possession of both parties, a fixed Court Fee of Rs.__________/-is paid u/s

34(2) of the A.P.C.F. AND S.V. ACT, 1956 which is sufficient.

2. Relief for Cancel entries in Revenue Records (4): the plaintiff has paid court

fee is Rs_________is paid u/s 43 of the A.P.C.F. AND S.V. ACT, 1956. which

is sufficient

9. That the plaintiff submits that this suit is filed within the limitation of time as per

Under Article 110 of schedule of the Limitation Act, 1963.

10. That the plaintiff submits that the documents related to suit schedule of property

are produced along with plaint as list of documents No. 1 to 14. For the kind

perusal of this Hon’ble court.

It is, therefore prayed, that the Hon’ble court may be pleased to decree the plaintiff of
suit as under.
1. To direct the division of suit schedule of the property into 1/4 th equal share,
allot one share such part to the Plaintiff considering its potentiality and
fertility by metes and bounds, pass preliminary decree accordingly in favor
of the plaintiff and against to the defendant No.1 to 2.
2. To cancel the names of the defendant No.4 to 5 in the 1B-Forms of R.O.R-
2017 and Pahanies-2017 (4) in respect of suit schedule of the property.
3. To Grant costs of the suit in favor of the PLAINTIFF and against to the
defendants jointly and severally.
4. To Such other relief as the Hon’ble court deems fit and proper in the
circumstances of the suit.
Date: 25 .09.2017.
PLAINTIFF
Advocate for plaintiff
Verification:-I, the above named Plaintiff herein is doing hereby declare that what is
stated in the above paras are to be true and correct to the best of my knowledge and
belief. Hence, verified and signed on this the 25th day of September, 2017 at
Gadwal.

PLAINTIFF
SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY:The land Sy.No.137/3 Extent of Ac. 2-20 Gts. And
Sy.No.137/4 Extent of Ac. 2-20 Gts, is situated in the limits of Umithyala Village of
K.T.Doddi Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District and compact bounded by as follows:
East : Land of Chinna Savaranna & others
West : Land of G.Hanumanthu & others
North : Land of Chinna Rangaswami & others.
South : Land of Govindamma & others.
PLAINTIFF

LIST of DOCUMENTS

Sl. Date of Description of the

Parties to document Remarks
No Document Document
Khasra Pahani-1954-
1 03-07-2017 Plaintiff &defendant C.C. Copy
55
2 07-06-2017 Do Pahani-1991-92 C.C. Copy
3 07-06-2017 Do Pahani-1992-93 C.C. Copy
4 07-06-2017 Do Pahani-1996-97 C.C. Copy
5 07-06-2017 Do Pahani-1999-2000 C.C. Copy
6 07-06-2017 Do Pahani-2002-2003 C.C. Copy
7 07-06-2017 Do Pahani-2005-2006 C.C. Copy
8 25-09-2017 Do 1B-Form of ROR C.C. Copy
9 25-09-2017 Do 1B-Form of ROR C.C. Copy
10 25-09-2017 Do Pahani-2017 C.C. Copy
11 25-09-2017 Do Pahani-2017 C.C. Copy
12 22-09-2017 Do Valuation Certificate Original
Date: 25 .09.2017. PLAINTIFF

IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

:: AT GADWAL

O.S. No. Of 2017

Between:

P.Anjaneyulu

…PLAINTIFF

Versus

Smt.Ananthamma & others

…DEFENDANTS

PLAINT FILED UNDER ORDR VII RULE 1

& 2 R/W U/S. 26 OF C.P.C.

Filed on: 25 -09-2017

Filed by:Plaintiff

Advocate for Plaintiff

Address for Service:

Sri B. Narsimhulu,

Advocate, Gadwal
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

:: AT GADWAL

O.S. No. Of 2017

Between:

P.Anjaneyulu
…PLAINTIFF

Versus

Smt.Ananthamma & others …DEFENDANTS

AFFIDAVIT

I, Smt. Pedda Anjaneyulu s/o Late Bajarappa, aged 35 years, Occ. Agril., R/o

Umithyala village of K.T.Doddi Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District, do hereby jointly

affirm and sincerely state on oath as follows:-

1. I am deponent – plaintiff in the above suit and I am filing this affidavit

myself and as such well acquainted with facts of this affidavit.

2. I submit that plaintiff have filed the above suit. The said plaint may be read

as part of this affidavit.

3. I submit that plaintiff is hereby swear that all the allegations in the plaint

filed by us are true and correct to the best of our knowledge and belief.

DEPONENT

(P.Anjaneyulu)

VERIFICATION:

The contents of this affidavit having been read over and explained in telugu to

the deponent who admitting the correctness and signed before me on this the 25 th

day of September 2017 at Gadwal.

Advocate
 FORM NO. 8
PARTICULARS OF VALUE OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY
(Rule 11 and 87 of part-Valume 1 C.R.P. and Co)
IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE
:: AT GADWAL
O.S. No. Of 2017
Between:
P.Anjaneyulu
…PLAINTIFF
Versus
Smt.Ananthamma & others …DEFENDANTS
Valuation of immovable property under section 10 of the Andhra Pradesh Court Fee & Suit Valuation Act
1 Sl items of immovable property One.
Registration District and Sub-
2 Jogulamba Gadwal
District
Taluk, Village where property is
3 Umithyala Village, K.T.Doddi Mandal
situated
Sy.No.137/3, 137/4
4 Sy.No.

5 Extent Ac. 5:00 Gts

6 Class of lands wet and dry Dry

7 Rent Value of the land --

8 Market value of the land

Value for purposes of Court Fee
& jurisdiction of Law under
which it is valued
Relief for partition: As per the valuation certificate issued
by the Sub-Register Office, Gadwal. The suit schedule of
the property is valued at Rs.______________/- per Acre,
that the suit schedule of the property total value comes
to Rs, ____________/- on which 1/4 th of the plaintiff share
is Rs.____________/- on which 3/4 th value
comes to Rs.____________/-, up on which Court fee of
Rs_______________ is payable u/s 34(1) of the A.P.C.F.
AND S.V. ACT, 1956. But the suit schedule land
property is in joint possession of both parties, a fixed
Court Fee of Rs.__________/-is paid u/s 34(2) of the
A.P.C.F. AND S.V. ACT, 1956 which is sufficient. And
Relief for Cancel entries in Revenue Records (4): the
plaintiff has paid court fee is Rs_________is paid u/s 43
of the A.P.C.F. AND S.V. ACT, 1956. which is sufficient

10 Remarks -

Dt. 25.09.2017. Advocate for PLAINTIFF PLAINTIFF

 F O R M NO.7
LIST OF DOCUMENT (RULE 9, 10 & 262)
(Under Order VII Code of Civil procedure)
IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE
:: AT GADWAL
O.S. No. Of 2017
Between:
P.Anjaneyulu
…PLAINTIFF
Versus
Smt.Ananthamma & others …DEFENDANTS
LIST OF DOCUMENT FILED BY PLAINTIFF

Sl. Date of Description of the

Parties to document Remarks
No Document Document
Khasra Pahani-1954-
1 03-07-2017 Plaintiff &defendant C.C. Copy
55
2 07-06-2017 Do Pahani-1991-92 C.C. Copy
3 07-06-2017 Do Pahani-1992-93 C.C. Copy
4 07-06-2017 Do Pahani-1996-97 C.C. Copy
5 07-06-2017 Do Pahani-1999-2000 C.C. Copy
6 07-06-2017 Do Pahani-2002-2003 C.C. Copy
7 07-06-2017 Do Pahani-2005-2006 C.C. Copy
8 25-09-2017 Do 1B-Form of ROR C.C. Copy
9 25-09-2017 Do 1B-Form of ROR C.C. Copy
10 25-09-2017 Do Pahani-2017 C.C. Copy
11 25-09-2017 Do Pahani-2017 C.C. Copy
12 22-09-2017 Do Valuation Certificate Original

Dt. 25 -09-2017 Advocate for PLAINTIFF

IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

:: AT GADWAL

O.S. No. Of 2017

Between:
 P.Anjaneyulu

…PLAINTIFF

Versus

Smt,Ananthamma & others

…DEFENDANTS

LIST OF DOCUMENTS

Filed on: 25 -09-2017

Filed by: Plaintiff

Advocate for Plaintiff

Address for Service:

Sri B. Narsimhulu,

Advocate, Gadwal

Form 1 No.(1) (O.5 R.1.5)

SUMMONS FOR THE APPEARANCE OF THE DEFENDANTS
IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE
:: AT GADWAL
O.S. No. Of 2017
Between:
P.Anjaneyulu
…PLAINTIFF
 Versus
Smt.Ananthamma & others …DEFENDANTS
To
1. Smt.Ananthamma W/o. Bajarappa, Age: 50 Years, Occ:Agri
2. Mr.Chinna Anjaneylu S/o. Bajarappa, Age: 35 Years, Occ:Agri
3. Mr.Hanumanthu S/o. Bajarappa, Age:29 Years, Occ:Agri
4. Mr,Anjaneyulu S/o.V.Karrenna, Age: 39 years, Occ:Agri.
5. Bheemulamma W/o.Prathap,Age:35 years, Occ:Agri
All are R/o. Umithyala Village of K.T.Doddi mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal
dist.

Whereas the PLAINTIFF have instituted a suit against you for partition of the
suit schedule property vide plaint copy attached there with you are hereby
summoned to appear in this court in person or by a pleader duly instructed and able
to answer all material question relating to the suit, to who shall be compacted by
some other person able to answer all such questions to the day
at O’ clock to the forenoon to answer the claim and you are
:directed to produce on that day all the documents upon which are intend to relay in
support of your defense. Take notice that in default of your appearance on the day of
before mentioned that suit will be heard and determined in your absence.
Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this day of 2017.

// BY ORDER //
SUPERINTENDENT.
Note:
1. You should appear and your witness will not attend on their own accord you
can have summons from this court to compel the attendance of witness
and to produce any documents, you have to call upon the witnesses to
produce by appearing to the court and on depositing the necessary
expenditure.
2. If you admit the claim you should pay the money the Court to bother with the
costs of the suit to avoid execution of the decree which may be against your
person or property, or both.

PROCESS PAYMENT FORM

IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE
:: AT GADWAL
O.S. No. Of 2017
Between:
P.Anjaneyulu …PLAINTIFF
Versus
Smt.Ananthamma & others …DEFENDANTS

Place of fixing
Date of Purpose of process and
Name of the Party Value
Deposit Deposit for
cancellation
 1. Smt.Ananthamma W/o.
Bajarappa, Age: 50 Years,

Issue Summon/Notice to the Defendants

Occ:Agri
2. Mr.Chinna Anjaneylu S/o.
Bajarappa, Age: 35 Years,
Occ:Agri
3. Mr.Hanumanthu S/o.
Bajarappa, Age:29 Years,
25-9-2017

Occ:Agri
4. Mr,Anjaneyulu
S/o.V.Karrenna, Age: 39
years, Occ:Agri.
5. Bheemulamma
W/o.Prathap,Age:35 years,
Occ:Agri
All are R/o. Umithyala
Village of K.T.Doddi
mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal
dist.

Date : 25 .09.2017 Counsel for PLAINTIFF

IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE
:: AT GADWAL
O.S. No. Of 2017
Between:

P.Anjaneyulu

…PLAINTIFF

Versus
Smt. Ananthamma & others

…DEFENDANTS

PROCESS OF PAYMENT

Filed on: 25 -09-2017

Filed by: Plaintiff

Advocate for Plaintiff

Address for Service:

Sri B. Narsimhulu,

Advocate, Gadwal