REFERENCE CALCULATION OUT PUT

Design Information
Design Code : BS EN 1991-2-2003
Bearing Presure : 670KN/m2 under Abutment
510KN/m2 under pier P1

Deck slab : 100mm

Wearing course : 50mm

Design Assumption
* Assume walk way kerb height as 150mm
* Side railing weight as 1KN/m
* Adjusment factors of α consider as 1
* Density of concrete is 25kN/m3
* Density of wearing surface and pavement materials as 24kN/m3
*
Thermal and wind actions along with creep & shrinkage of
PS girders are not considered for load combinations. Thus
effects of displacement and deformations are assumed to be
negligible.

Load Calculations
Permanent action
PC Girder = From Autocad section area
= 0.3619348*25
= 9.048 kN/m

Cross Diaphram = 0.6*1.2*25

= 18.0 kN/m

Deck slab = 25*0.1 = 2.5 kN/m

Wearing surface = 24*0.05 = 1.2 kN/m
Walkway finishes including kerb were assume 175mm height
Walkway finishes = 24*0.175 = 4.2 kN/m
hand rail = 1 kN/m
BS EN 1991- Variable actions
2-2003
Table 4.4A Walk way = 3 KN/m2
Table 4.1 Carrriage way
total width = 11 m
Carraige way width = 7.2 m
Number of nationala lane (Int (w/3)= 2 with remain 1.2m
Table 4.2 Load Model Lane 1 Lane 1 remain
LM 1 (KN/m2) 9 2.5 2.5
LM 2 (KN) 300 200 0

Load Calculation to Girders

Consider the applicability of courbon's method
* Span/width =23.2/11 = 2.11> 2 Hence “ok”
* Depth of cross girders = 42 in > 0.75 x depth of longitudinal
girders = (54.5 in). Hence “ok”
* Longitudinal beams are interconnected by symmetrically
spaced cross girders of adequate stiffness
So it shall be applicable
According to the Courbon's Method getting higher results on
most end girders. So girder "A" were selected for critical load
calculation
 ∑ x2 = (2^2+4^2)*2 = 40
n = 5

So Ri = P(1/5+e*4/40) = P (0.2+0.1e)
x is positive for the considered girder direction from center line

With unit load P=1 by substituting aboave values with difrent x

values for Girder "A"
@ e= 0 From Equation R1= 0.2
@ e= 3.6 From Equation R1= 0.56
@ e= -2 From Equation R1= 0
@ e= -3.6 From Equation R1= -0.16

*
As per the code two tandem systems on adjacent notional lanes
are taken into account, they may be brought closer, with a
distance between wheel axles not below 0.5m (Reference BS EN
1991-2:2003 Clause 4.3.2 (5))

*
if span is greater than 10m, each tandem system are replaced in
each lane by a one-axle concentrated load of weight equal to the
total weight of the two axles (Reference BS EN 1991-2:2003
Clause 4.3.2 (6))

So following loading arrangment shall be considered for the

courbon's Method
With reference to above loads and there load center distance
shall be govern effective Loading arrangment on girder "A"

Equivelant
Load Type Load Point load e RA
NL1 UDL 9 27 2.1 11.07
NL2 UDL 2.5 7.5 -0.9 0.825
Pedestrian
UDL 3 5.7 4.55 3.7335
300 300 3.6 168
NL1 TS
300 300 1.6 108
200 200 0.6 52
NL2 TS
200 200 -1.4 12

So total Resultant variable action on selected Girder "A" is

Point Load = 168+ 108+ 52+ 12 = 340 kN
UDL = 11.07+ 0.825+ 3.7335 = 15.6285 kN/m

Other actions on selected Beam which self weight of the

structures are going to uniformly distribute to the beam with
propotion to effective deapth

Load Type Load Efective width Resultant force

Deck slab 2.5 2.5 6.25 KN/m
Wearing
course 1.2 0.6 0.72 KN/m
Walkway 4.2 1.9 7.98 KN/m
PC Girder 9.05 9.05 KN/m
Guard rail 1 1 KN/m
Diaphram 18.0 1 18 KN

UDL on dead load = 6.25+ 0.72+ 7.98+ 9.05

= 24 kN/m
Guard rail Load = 1 kN/m
= 25 kN/m
Point load on Girder A = 18 KN AT Diaphram connection

Total Dead Load = 25 kN/m

= 18 KN at 4.25M C-C

Total pedastrian Load = 3.734 kN/m

Total Trafic Load = 11.9 kN/m
= 340 KN at midle of the girder
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
-1000
-2000
-3000
-4000
-5000
-6000

Diaphram Load TS load UDL SLS

Middle Moment UDL dead = 25*23.2^2/8

= 1682 kN/m

Middle Moment UDL traffic = 11.895*23.2^2/8

= 800.3 kN/m

Middle Moment pedastrian = 3.74*23.2^2/8

Load 251.19 kN/m

Middle moment From TS = 340*23.2/4

= 1972 kN/m

Middle Load From diaphram = 264.6 kN/m

Thus SLS Resultant Middle = 264.6+ 1972+ 1682+ 800.3+ 251.19

moment
= 4970.09 kN/m

Shear force from Selfweight = 25*23.2*0.5

290 KN

Shear force from Diapram = 18*3

 = 54 KN

Shear force from Pedastrian = (3.7335)*23.2*0.5

43.31 KN

Shear force from TS = 340*0.5

= 170 KN

Shear force from trafic load = (11.895)*23.2*0.5

= 137.982 KN

Total shear force of end of = 290+54+43.31+170+138

beam at SLS = 695.292 KN
1000
800
600
400
200
0
-200 0 5 10 15 20 25
-400
-600
-800
-1000
Diaphram Load TS load UDL SLS
ULS 1

For the ULS shall be consider following Load combinations

BS EN 1990:ULS1: 1.35Gkj, sup + 1.0 Gkj, inf + 1.35 (TS + UDL + 0.4 x qfk)
2002 ULS2: 1.35 Gkj, sup + 1.0 Gkj, inf+ 1.35 gr1b
ULS3: 1.35 Gkj, sup + 1.0 Gkj, inf + 1.35 gr2
ULS4: 1.35 Gkj, sup + 1.0 Gkj, inf + 1.35 gr5

So Maximum Moment at Middle for first combination of ULS

= 1.35*(1682+264.6)+ 1.35(800.3+ 1972+ 0.4*251.19)
= 6506.158 kNm
0
-1000 0 5 10 15 20 25
-2000
-3000
-4000
-5000
-6000
-7000

SLS ULS1
 -4000
-5000
-6000
-7000

SLS ULS1

So Maximum Shear force at beam end for first combination of ULS

= 1.35*(290+54)+ 1.35(170+138+ 0.4*43.31)
= 903.5631 kN

Abutment Design
Claculation of abutment height is based on the provided reduce
levels with maniputlated structural finish level based on the
Girder and slab finishis details.
RL of the base = 95.3 m
RL of Girder Bottom = 100.65 m
Girder Height = 1.35 m
Slab and Wearing corse = 0.15 m
SFL of Road surface = 102.15 m
So Abutment Height = 6.85 m
Width of Abutment = 11.6 m

Load Calculation to Abutment

 * Vertical load on abutment from superstructure
There assume hiegher loading value for the more safe design on
* abutment by considering the design load value calculated for the
edge beam by courbone's Method.
* Assume Pore water presure desipate along the provided weep holes
* Assume abutement is RCC Foundation and place at the rock
level with scouring is considered up to the bed

From shear foce calculation of beam

Self weight of the Super structure = 290 KN/ Bearing pad
Self weight of the Diapram structure= 54 KN/ Bearing pad
Total Dead Load on the abutment = 344 KN/ Bearing pad
uniform Dead load on abutment = 172 KN/ m

Load from the pedastrian (Imposed)= 43.31 KN/ Bearing pad

Load from the trafic (Imposed) = 137.982 KN/ Bearing pad
Load from the TS (Imposed) = 170 KN/ Bearing pad
Total Imposed Load on the abutmen= 351.292 KN/ Bearing pad
uniform Imposed load on abutment = 175.646 KN/ m

Braking & acceleration forces

Cl 4.4.1 Q1k = 0.6 x αQ1 x (2 Q1k) + 0.1 x αq1 x q1k x w1 x L
Cl 4.4.1(2) whare 180 x αQ1 (KN) ≤Q1k≤900(KN)
Whare αQ1 and αq1 equal to 1

Q1k = 0.6 x 300 x 2 + 0.1 x 9 x 3 x 23.2 = 422.64 KN

Q2k = 0.6 x 200 x 2 + 0.1 x 2.5 x 3 x 23.2 = 257.4 KN
So use Q1k =422.64KN by distributing along the Abutment
Thus uniform force on abutment by Qlk = 36.43 KN/m

Active forces on the earth retain side of the Abbutement.

Lateral Presure on the wall
 Abutment Height = 6.85 m
Lateral presure coefficient Ka = (1-Sinφ)/(1+sinφ)

Cl. 4.9.1 Assume Soil friction angle of φ = 30

Ka = (1-Sin30)/(1+sin30)
= 0.333

Cl. 4.9.1 Base Firction coefficient μ = tan 30

= 0.577

Assume Soil Density = 19 kN/m3

BS EN 1991- Surcharge: Due Non availability of Data were considered 20kN/m2

2-2003 Cl.4.9
Cl. 5.7.1 CIRIA So Surcharge Acting On wall = 20*3*2/11.6 KN/m2
= 10.34 KN/m2

PD6694-1:2011 So line load from surcharge Acting = F Ka Nlane/Wabutment

On wall Hs = 2*330*0.33*2/11.6
= 37.55 KN/m

Surcharge Presure on wall Ps = 10.3 x 0.33 x 6.85

= 23.62 KN/m

Soil Presure on wall Psoil = 19 x 0.33 x 6.85^2 * 0.5

= 148.6 kN/m

Pore water pressure on wall (Dosent required due provision of weep holes)

Following Priliminary section parameters were considered for the Abutment

 Density of concrete = 25 KN/m3
Abutment Weight W1 = (1.25*5.1+1.2*4.1+4.1*0.5*0.3+1.35*0.3)*25
= 307.9 KN
COG of abutment = (1.25*3.75^2*0.5+1.2*4.1*1.35+0.
15*4.1*0.7*0.5+1.35*0.3*1.8)/
= (258/25)
2.313 m From Toe

Earth fill on abutment base = 2.4*5.45*19

261.6 kN/m

So with above wall and load configurations folllowing

dimensional arrangment shall be considered for the stability
evalauation.

Restoring moment and stabilizing force on the abutment wall

around the toe
Moment
EC 0 EQU Stabilizing
Weight ϒg ϒq table A2 EC1
Source Lever Moment force EQU
(kN/m)
arm (m) (kNm/m) ψ1 ψ2 ψ3 (KNm) EC1 (KN)
Abutment 307.9 2.313 712.05 676.4475 168.890605
Earth on base 261.6 3.9 1020.24 969.228 143.505586
0.95

Super structure
dead 172 1.95 335.4 318.63 94.3538258
Surcharge on
base 18.62069 3.9 72.62069 68.98966 10.2147285
0.95

Super structure
imposed 175.646 1.95 342.5097 325.3842 96.3539074
∑ 935.7 2482.8 2358.7 513.318653
 Overturning moment and De stabilizing force on the abutment
wall around the toe EC 0 EQU Stabilizing
Weight Lever Moment ϒ ϒ table A2 EC1 force EQU
Source
(kN/m) arm (m) (kNm/m) g q ψ1 ψ2 ψ3 (KNm) EC1 (KN)
Soil Presure 148.6 2.283 339.2221 1.05 356.1832 155.992852
Line Presure
Surcharge 37.55172 6.85 257.2293 385.844 56.3275862
Surcharge

1.5
presure 23.61699 3.425 80.88818 90.9992 26.5691097

0.75
Breaking
force 36.43448 5.35 194.9245 219.29 40.9887931
∑ 246.2 872.3 1052.3 279.878341

FOS Sliding 2.2 <1.5 So Ok <1 So Ok 1.8340778

FOS Overturning <1.5 So Ok 2.846409 2.241417 <1 So Ok

Check for the Bearing failure.

Lever arm were considered from the center of the base
Weight Lever Moment
Source
(kN/m) arm (m) (kNm/m)
Abutment 307.9 0.2 73.0
Earth on base 261.6 -1.4 -353.2
Super structure
dead 172.0 0.6 103.2
Surcharge on
base 18.6 -1.4 -25.1

Super structure
imposed 175.6 0.6 105.4
∑ 935.7 -96.7

Weight Lever Moment

Source
(kN/m) arm (m) (kNm/m)
Soil Presure
Line Presure 148.6 2.3 339.2221
Surcharge
Surcharge 37.6 6.9 257.2293
presure
Breaking 23.6 3.425 80.88818
force 36.4 5.4 194.9245
∑ 246.2 872.3

Summary of the Base reactions

Vertical Load N = 935.7 KN
Moment around the base center = 775.6 KN

M = N/BD +/- 6M/BD2

M max = 935.74/(5.1*1) + 6 * 775.6/(5.1^2)
= 362.3911 < Ground bearing capacity of 670 KN/m2
 M min = 935.74/(5.1*1) - 6 * 775.6/(5.1^2)
= 4.566433 < Ground bearing capacity of 670 KN/m2
So there have no negetive presure which shall tensioning the base.

Summary of Stability check

Design parameter SLS FOS Status ULS FOS Status
Sliding 2.2 >1.5 So OK 1.83 >1 So OK
Over turning 2.85 >1.5 So OK 2.24 >1 So OK

Bearing capacity 362.3911 670 KN/m2 4.566433 >0

So selected Abutment parameters are ok in terms of structural

stability

R/F Design for the Abutment

As per the stability calculation following
As per the EC 0 and EC4 Load combination,
1.35 Qk +1.5 Gk+1.5 GKiψi combination were selected for the
RCC design
Moment
Axial Forces On Wall EC 0 EQU Axial force
Weight Lever Moment ϒ /ϒ table A2 EC1 EQU EC1
Source
(kN/m) arm (m) (kNm/m) g q ψ1 ψ2 ψ3 (KNm) (KN)
Abutment 138.4 0.000 0 1.35 0 186.80625
Super structure 1.35
dead 172.0 0.15 25.8 34.83 232.2

Super structure 1.50

imposed 175.6 0.15 26.3469 39.52035 263.469
∑ 74.4 682.47525
Lever arm measured from wall center to Load center in horizontally

Lateral Force on wall EC 0 EQU Shear force

Weight Lever Moment ϒ /ϒ table A2 EC1 EQU EC1
Source
(kN/m) arm (m) (kNm/m) g q ψ1 ψ2 ψ3 (KNm) (KN)
Soil Presure 148.6 1.08 160.9445 1.50 241.4168 222.846932
Line Presure 1.50
Surcharge 37.6 5.65 212.1672 318.2509 56.3275862
Surcharge 1.50
presure 23.6 2.23 52.54779 78.82169 35.4254797
Breaking force 36.4 4.15 151.2031 1.50 226.8047 54.6517241
∑ 865.3 369.251722
Lever arm measured from Base top level to Load center in Vertically

So Summary of the wall Design Moment and shear Force at base top level

Moment Med 939.6 kNm

 Shear Force Ved 369.3 KN
Axial Force Ned 682.5 KN

Assume Abutment concrete grade is 25N/mm2

Concrete compression capacity of the Wall = 0.567 fck bd
= 0.567*1000*1200*25
= 17010 KN
So axial force capacity is higher than the exisitng axial force. So
it shall be considered as the Cantilever wall

k = Med/bd fck
2

= 939.6*10^6/(1000*1175^2*25)
= 0.027224 <0.156
Figure 4.5 la = 0.95
z = 0.95*1175
= 1116 mm

As = Med/0.87 fy z
= 939.6*10^6/(0.87*500*1116.25)
= 1935.142 mm2/m

As Min = 0.13*bd/100
= 0.13*1000*1175/100
= 1527.5 mm2 < 1935.142

So As req = 1935.142 mm2/m

Provide H 20@ 100mm C-C Vertical and H20-200 Horizontal
So As pro V = 3130 mm2/m
So As pro H= 1565 mm2/m

Check For shear

Design Shear stress on wall = 369252/(1000*1175)
= 0.314 N/mm2
Shear capacity of concrete vRdc = (0.12k100ρfck)^1/3)bd
= 372 KN < 369.25
So shear capacity is ok

As per the Design calculation on bearing presure calculation.

Base Moment at bottom RHS = (362.4+273)*0.5*1.2^2*0.5
= 228.744 KNm/m

Base Moment at bottom LHS = (4.6+168)*0.5*2.4^2*0.5

= 248.544 KNm/m

So maximum Bottom moment = 248.544 kNm

k = Med/bd fck
2

= 248.54*10^6/(1000*1175^2*25)
= 0.007201 <0.156 So section is singly R/F
la = 0.93
z = 0.93*1175
= 1093 mm

As = Med/0.87 fy z
= 248.5*10^6/(0.87*500*1092.75)
= 522.8694 mm2/m

As Min = 0.13*bd/100
= 0.13*1000*1175/100
= 1527.5 mm2 > 522.8694
Thus Use H20@ 200 Top and bottom R/F
PIER DESIGN
Claculation of Pier height is based on the provided reduce levels
with maniputlated structural finish level based on the Girder and
slab finishing details.
RL of the base = 89.55 m
RL of Girder Bottom = 100.65 m
Girder Height = 1.35 m
Slab and Wearing corse = 0.15 m
SFL of Road surface = 102.15 m
So Pier Height = 11.1 m
Width of Pier cap = 11.6 m
 TYIPICAL PIER CROSS SECTION

Load Calculation to Pier

* Vertical load on Pier from superstructure
* There assume hiegher loading value for the more safe design by
considering the design load value calculated for the edge beam
by courbone's Method.
* Considered Traction and Breaking force on piers
* Considered water current and log impacts on pier and wind force
on the bridge
* Assume Pier Foundation is RCC pad place at the rock level with
scouring is considered up to the rock

From shear foce calculation of beam of bridge deck analysis

Self weight of the Super structure = 580 KN/ Bearing pad
Self weight of the Diapram structure= 108 KN/ Bearing pad
Total Dead Load on the abutment = 688 KN/ Bearing pad
uniform Dead load on abutment = 344 KN/ m

Load from the pedastrian (Imposed)= 86.62 KN/ Bearing pad

 Load from the trafic (Imposed) = 275.96 KN/ Bearing pad
Load from the TS (Imposed) = 340 KN/ Bearing pad
Total Imposed Load on the abutmen= 702.584 KN/ Bearing pad
uniform Imposed load on abutment = 351.292 KN/ m

Braking & acceleration forces

Since one end of the girders dowel on the pier and other side
girders act as rollers on the pier. So Traction and breaking forces
will be applicable only at one side
Cl 4.4.1 Q1k = 0.6 x αQ1 x (2 Q1k) + 0.1 x αq1 x q1k x w1 x L
Cl 4.4.1(2) whare 180 x αQ1 (KN) ≤Q1k≤900(KN)
Whare αQ1 and αq1 equal to 1

Q1k = 0.6 x 300 x 2 + 0.1 x 9 x 3 x 23.2 = 422.64 KN

Q2k = 0.6 x 200 x 2 + 0.1 x 2.5 x 3 x 23.2 = 257.4 KN
So use Q1k =422.64KN by distributing along the Pier beam
Thus uniform force on abutment by Qlk = 36.43 KN/m

Cl. 4.7.2.1 Colision force on the pier = 1000 KN Along the bridge
= 500 KN normal to the bridge

for the calculation were considered Load case 2 full ooad condition

Wind Load calculation to the Bridge

EN 1991-1- Wind Presure calcualtion according to the "Eurocode 1: Actions on
4:2004 structures - General actions - Part 1-4: Wind actions"

Natinal Annex Assume wind speed is Vb,0 = 22 ms-1 for Zone 3

Cl: 4.2 Basic Wind speer Vb = Cdir x Cseason x Vb,o

Cdir Directional Factor = 1
Cseason Seasonal Factor = 1
 Vb = 22 ms-1

Cl: 4.3 Mean Wind velocity Vm (z) = Cr(z) x Co(z) x Vb

Table 4.1 Assume terrain category is 0

Z0 Roughness length = 0.003 m
Zmin Minimum Height = 1.0 m
Zmax Maximum Height = 200.0 m
C0 (z) orography factor = 1 due flat terrain
Cr (z) orography factor = Kr ln (Z/Z0)
Kr = 0.19(Z0/Z0,ii)0.07
= 0.15604

Cl: 4.5 Peak Velocity Presure qp (z) = Ce(z) x qb

qb = 1/2. ρ x Vb2
ρ = 1.25 kg/m2
qb = 0.5*1.25*484
= 0.303 KN/m2

Cl: 4.4 Standard deviation of turbulance σv = Kr. Vb. Kt

whare Kt = 1
σv = 0.156x22x1
= 3.433 ms-1

Cl: 4.4 Turbulance Intensity lv(z) = σv/Vm(z)

= (1+7 lv(z)) 1/2 x ρ x Vm(z)
2
Cl: 4.5 Wind pesure of Building qp(z)
At deck level Z= 13.6m
qp(z) =

Level Height (z) Vm (z) lv(z) qp (z) Fw(z)/A

Deck 13.6 28.9014 0.11878 0.95611 1.09953 Without traffic
Deck 15 23 0.15604 0.69175 1.03763 With traffic
Wind force acting on the structure
Cl. 5.3 Fw (z) = CsCd Cf qp(ze) A
Figure 6.1 Z(e) = 11.1+d2 or d3

d2 = 2.5 m
d3 = 3.9 m

d2 = without trafic
d3 = with trafic
Cl 8.3, fig 8.3 Without trafi b/dtot = 11.6/2.5 = 4.6 So Cf = 1.15
With trafic b/dtot = 11.6/3.9 = 3.0 So Cf = 1.5
Cl 6.2 Consider Cs, Cd factors = 1

So Wind force efective on deck to = 23.2*1.09953*2.5

pier without trafic condition = 63.77 kN

So Wind force efective on deck to = 23.2*1.03763*3.9

pier with trafic condition = 93.88 kN

Horizontal Load due to water current on pier

P = 52kV2
Assume Square ended pier k = 1.5
Assume river velocity v = 1.1 m/s

P = 52*1.5*1.1*1.1
= 94.38 kg/m2
= 0.944 kN/m2

Force due to the debris P= 52v2 = 0.629kN/m2 whare k=1

Assume length of 11.6m with depth of 1.2m debris
So Maximum debris force on pie= 0.63*1.2*11.6
= 8.77 KN

Force Due to Log impact = 0.1W V

= 0.1*20*1.1
= 2.2 KN
Water curent force shall be applied over the height of pier and
debris and Log Imfact load to be applied at the HFL level normal
to the river flaw direction.

Analysis were carried by SAP 2000 Model and following results

were obtained
Load combinations were considered with followings
 pier capping beam design
Maximum Moment of the beam were obtained from the model output

Maximum Moment= 1202 kNm

Maximum Shear = 1197 kN

So assume 1000x1000mm Capping beam on pier

Assume Pier shaft and capping beam concrete grade is 25N/mm2

k = Med/bd fck
2

= 1202*10^6/(1000*925^2*25)
= 0.056193 <0.156
Figure 4.5 la = 0.95
z = 0.95*925
= 879 mm

As = Med/0.87 fy z
= 1202*10^6/(0.87*500*878.75)
= 3144.488 mm2/m

As Min = 0.13*bd/100
= 0.13*1000*925/100
= 1202.5 mm2 < 3144.488

So As req = 3144.488 mm2/m

Provide H 25@ 125mm C-C in Bottom and top and H20-200 side bars
 So As pro V = 3984 mm2/m
So As pro H= 1565 mm2/m

Check For shear

Design Shear stress on beam = 1197000/(1000*925)
= 1.294 N/mm2
Shear capacity of concrete vRdc = (0.12k100ρfck)^1/3)bd
= 344 KN < 1197
So shear links to be provide

EC 2 Cl 6.2.3 VRd max (22) = 0.124 bd(1-fck/250)fck

= 2580.75 KN > Ved = 1197
So value of θ <22

Asw/s = Ved/(0.78dfyk cot θ)

= 1.338
Assume H10 @100mm Space
Asw/s = 2*78/100 = 1.56 Hence Ok

PIER SHAFT R/F DESIGN

From Model output

Colum Design were carried by PROKONE program and following

results were obtained.
So Use 36H32 bars with T10@150 LINKS

Refer Pier Base in next sheet

Pier Base Design
Support reaction extracted from the SAP 2000 Model
TABLE: Joint Reactions
Joint OutputCase CaseType F1 F2 F3 M1 M2
Text Text Text KN KN KN KN-m KN-m
1 DEAD LinStatic 26.1 0.0 1505.6 0.0 94.7
1 LIVE LinStatic 27.1 0.0 1013.8 0.0 98.2
1 WIND LinStatic -29.0 0.0 -57.5 0.0 -187.0
1 BREAK LinStatic 0.0 -139.4 0.0 1553.1 0.0
1 P Water LinStatic 0.0 -15.7 0.0 87.2 0.0
1 P Debris LinStatic -3.5 0.0 -3.3 0.0 -19.4
1 P log LinStatic -0.9 0.0 -0.8 0.0 -4.9
48.9 -155.1 2515.2 1640.3 168.6
2 DEAD LinStatic 0.0 0.0 1965.6 0.0 0.0
2 LIVE LinStatic 0.0 0.0 1482.5 0.0 0.0
2 WIND LinStatic -36.3 0.0 0.5 0.0 -212.8
2 BREAK LinStatic 0.0 -143.7 0.0 1583.5 0.0
2 P Water LinStatic 0.0 -15.7 0.0 87.2 0.0
2 P Debris LinStatic -2.9 0.0 -1.5 0.0 -17.4
2 P log LinStatic -0.7 0.0 -0.4 0.0 -4.4
-40.0 -159.4 3446.2 1670.7 -234.6
3 DEAD LinStatic -26.1 0.0 1505.6 0.0 -94.7
3 LIVE LinStatic -27.1 0.0 1013.8 0.0 -98.2
3 WIND LinStatic -28.6 0.0 57.0 0.0 -184.6
3 BREAK LinStatic 0.0 -139.4 0.0 1553.1 0.0
3 P Water LinStatic 0.0 -15.7 0.0 87.2 0.0
3 P Debris LinStatic -2.4 0.0 4.9 0.0 -15.4
3 P log LinStatic -0.6 0.0 1.2 0.0 -3.8
-84.8 -155.1 2582.4 1640.3 -396.8

Total Vertical Force on base = 8543.8 kN

Total Sliding on base (μR) Whare μ=0.58 = 4955.4017 kN
Total lateral force in X direction = -75.9
Total lateral force in X direction = -469.6
Resultant Lateral force = 475.73754 < 4955.4 So sliding of
the base is Ok

Total Reaction on base

Fx Fy FZ MX MY
Location KN KN KN KN-m KN-m
1 48.9 -155.1 2515.2 1640.3 168.6
2 -40.0 -159.4 3446.2 1670.7 -234.6
3 -84.8 -155.1 2582.4 1640.3 -396.8
Total -75.9 -469.6 8543.8 4951.4 462.7
Assume Following base configuration for the basic design calculation

Assume X= 2.5 m
Y= 4m

Maximum Bearing Preasure = N/BD + 6Mx/BD2+ 6My/BD2

= 8543.796/(13)*4)+4951.3925*6/((13)*4^2)+462.7448*6/((13)^2*4)
= 311.2396 KN/m2 <510 ok

Maximum Bearing Preasure = N/BD - 6Mx/BD2- 6My/BD2

= 8543.796/(13)*4)-4951.3925*6/((13)*4^2)-462.7448*6/((13)^2*4)
= 17.367937 KN/m2 <510 ok

So Provide 13mx4m Base on Pier P1

 SLS PRESURE DISTRIBUTION UNDER THE BASE

Maximum Moment at Base at ULS = 1.5*(311+208)*0.5*1.4*1.4*0.5

= 381.465 kNm

= Med/bd fck
2
k
= 381.47*10^6/(1000*1175^2*25)
= 0.0110519511 <0.156
la = 0.95
z = 0.95*1175
= 1116.25 mm

As = Med/0.87 fy z
= 381.47*10^6/(0.87*500*1116.25)
= 785.6045102 mm2/m

As Min = 0.13*bd/99
= 0.13*1000*1175/100
= 1527.5
Thus Use H20@ 200 Top and bottom R/F
1196