Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Exception:
If the interruption is due to
fortuitous event of force
majeure. (Art. 698, NCC)
Duty to exercise
extraordinary diligence
General:
-A common carrier is
bound to carry the
passengers safely as far
as human care and
foresight can provide,
using the utmost diligence
of very cautious persons,
with a due regard for all
the circumstances. (Art.
1755, NCC)
-The extraordinary
responsibility of the
common carrier lasts from
the time the goods are
unconditionally placed in
the possession of, and
received by the carrier for
transportation until the
same are delivered,
actually or constructively,
by the carrier to the
consignee or to the person
who has a right to receive
them. (Art. 1736, NCC)
Exception:
-No other defense may be
raised. (Art. 1734):
1. Flood, storm,
earthquake, lightning,
or other natural disaster
or calamity
2. Act of the public
enemy in war, whether
international or civil
3. Act or omission of
the shipper or owner of
the goods
4. The character of the
goods or defects in the
packing or in the
containers
5. Order or act of
competent public
authority
6. Exercise of
extraordinary diligence.
CONTRACT OF CARRIAGE OF PASSENGERS
Common Carrier Passenger
Obligation to Accept Obligation to observe diligence of a
good father of a family
General:
A common carrier granted a certificate of General:
public convenience is duty bound to
accept passengers or cargo without any The passenger must observe the diligence
discrimination. It is illegal for domestic of a good father of a family to avoid injury
ship operators to refuse to accept or carry to himself. (1761, NCC)
passengers or cargo without just cause.
(Section 16, RA 9295)
General: General:
The common carrier is bound to transport The Passenger must pay the
passengers to the destination agreed compensation agreed upon in the
upon and without delay. contract of carriage.
Exception: Exception:
If delay is due to fortuitous event of force If it has been agreed that the carriage be
majeure. (Art. 698, NCC) gratuitous.
General:
-A common carrier is bound to carry the
passengers safely as far as human care
and foresight can provide, using the
utmost diligence of very cautious
persons, with a due regard for all the
circumstances. (Art. 1755, NCC)
- The duty of a common carrier to provide
safety to its passengers so obligates it not
only during the course of the tripe, but for
so long as the passengers are within its
premises and where they ought to be in
pursuance of the contract of carriage.
(LRTA v. Navidad, 2003)
Exception:
-All persons who remain on the premises,
without just cause and not part of the
contract of carriage.
-When the negligence of the passenger is
the proximate and only cause of the injury
or death, the common carrier is not liable
if he exercised extraordinary diligence.
EXTRAORDINARY DILLIGENCE OF A COMMON CARRIER
A common carrier is bound to carry the passengers safely as far a human care
and foresight provide, using the utmost diligence of very cautious persons, with due
regard for all circumstances.
By Sea Seaworthy - The ship which will transport the passengers and goods
is seaworthy. Seaworthiness is implied
Cargoworthy - the carrier must not accept the goods that cannot
properly be transported in the ship. The ship must be efficiently strong
and equipped to carry the particular kind of cargo which she has
contracted to carry and her cargo must be so loaded that it is safe for
her to proceed on her voyage.
Adequate Equipment - With respect to vessels that carries
passengers, the Maritime Industry Authority prescribes rules which
provide for indispensable equipment and facilities. e.g. Exit doors, life
boats, live vests.
Competence of Captain and Crew - Failure on the part of the carrier
to provide competent captain and crew should be distinguished from
the negligence of the said captain and crew, because the latter is
covered by the Limited Liability Rule (liability of the shipowner may
be limited to the value of the vessel). If the negligence of the captain
and crew can be traced to the fact that they are really incompetent,
the Limited Liability Rule cannot be invoked because the shipowner
may be deemed negligent.