Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Introduction
Background
Obesity is a health concern among children that can be
reversed. Over 17 percent of children and teens are obese, and
these numbers are climbing every year. The obesity trend among
children and teens can be reversed with the help of their
community, parents, schools and peers. Unlike adults, children
and teens rely on their parents or guardians for food and
shelter. Many children fail to exercise because parents allow
children to sit in front of a television, computer, or play
video games. Many children spend more than three hours a day on
these devices, almost every day per week.(Moores, 2012). Many
children fail to exercise because they spend most of their time
on technology instead of physical activity. Technology is a
large factor for obesity and inactive children. Eating habits
are another reason for obesity in children. Calorie-rich snacks
and drinks are readily available for children to eat. For
younger kids, the parents are providing these unhealthy snacks
because they are easy. As childhood obesity becomes more
prevalent, snack machines have been replaced or taken out of the
schools. Pop machines are being replaced by lower calorie
sports drinks and water. Seventy-five percent of teens eat fast
food on a weekly basis. The fast food industry spends $4.2
billion annually on advertisement, so there is no question why
so many teens frequent the fast food chains (National Bureau of
Economic Research, 2012). Studies are trying to blame obesity
on fast food chains, but in reality it is the people who are
consuming the fast food. Sadly, the numbers are going to
continue to climb if policymakers do not set regulations to help
reverse these trends. Public health practitioners and
policymakers are trying to find effective ways of slowing and
reversing obesity trends (Boehmer et al, 2009). Many state laws
and regulations addressing the problem have been introduced and
enacted. Hopefully by addressing these issues, it will help the
passage of further policies to help prevent obesity. For
example, a study from 2005 to 2006, used key-informant
interviews that were conducted with 16 legislators and staffers
from 11 states examined qualitative factors that enable and
impede state-level childhood obesity prevention programs. One
factor that might impede the passage of childhood obesity
programs are lobbyists from fast food chains or those from
“unhealthy” food companies. On the other hand, the media may
help positively influence obesity prevention programs. These
prevention programs also need key players such as parents,
physicians, and schools to help support obesity prevention
programs. Individual states have most of the power to influence
policies and regulations in the United States. State
governments are able maintain substantial power over actions
that affect public health. An example of a state legislation
that has taken place within the last five years is an issue
addressing school nutrition standards, and physical education
and activity. Hopefully within the next five years more
legislation can take plan to further these standards. We will
look at the topic areas when we identify the key stakeholders in
the landscape section.
Before the steps are put into place, we must know what our
policy issue consists of. Obesity is our health policy of
choice. Our problem statement is; “What type and scope of a
program must be implemented in order to decrease the obesity
rate among U.S. children within the next five years?” The first
problem of this statement asks what type and scope of program
must be implemented to decrease obesity rate among children. We
also ask if the program can be solved within the next five
years, or at least give the recommendation time to see if it is
beneficial. We have a few things to analyze when breaking down
our problem statement. The first statement allows us to come up
with many opportunities and decide on those, instead of asking,
“Should a program be implemented to decrease obesity rate among
children?” The first part of the problem statement allows us
options that we need for a better analysis. It also allows us
to weigh the pros and cons of different solutions and come up
with one that is agreed upon by the decision maker. The second
part of the question gives us a time frame. We need a time
frame or stopping point so we do not have to analyze
indefinitely. The time frame gives the analyzer an ending to
the problem. Looking at the overall statement, we see that the
options for decreasing obesity can be broad, but the time frame
of five years narrows it down to make the problem manageable.
For the sake of our topic analysis on obesity, this would be an
acceptable problem statement.
Conceptual framework
Methodology
Research Design
RESPONDENTS
Educational Institutions
Medical Organizations
from the different health station for the patient with obesity.
Data analysis
The study is the first to be published using new data from the
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).
NHANES is a large nationally representative survey conducted by
the National Center for Health Statistics, a part of the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention. NHANES is designed to assess
the health and nutritional status of adults and children in the
United States. An allergy/asthma component was supported by
NIEHS and added to the 2005–2006 NHANES study, making it the
largest nationally representative dataset of allergy and asthma
information ever assembled in the United States.
"We have all the pieces of the puzzle in this dataset," said
Zeldin. "The allergy and asthma component of NHANES provides
allergen exposure information, allergic sensitization
information, as well as disease outcome information. There is a
wealth of knowledge we will be able to gain by analyzing these
data that will be useful to allergy and asthma sufferers."