NATIONAL COLLEGE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Amafel Building, Aguinaldo Highway, Dasmariñas, Cavite

Tel. No.: (046)416-6278 ● Telefax: (046)416-0166 ● Mobile No.:+63918-888-6278
www.ncst.edu.ph

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
BS Architecture Program
S.Y. 2019-2020, 1st Semester

Ar.Alver A.Verzosa ,UAP

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 3 ( ARDE 3)

PLATE NO.1” A CATHOLIC SECONDARY SCHOOL BUILDING”

DESIGN PROBLEM:

In response to the increasing backlogs of school buildings particularly of secondary school building & with the
current poor situations of school buildings in some areas of Cavite, some wealthy and philanthropies officials of a
Parents Teachers Association(PTA) wish to put up a new secondary school building w/ complete modern amenities,
facilities, and a healthy environment for the student in an irregular & and relatively slope lot.

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS:

BP 344 (accessibility law) COMMUNITY LANDMARK

PD 1096 (national building code) Environmental considerations
PD 1185 (fire code of the Philippines) Vehicular/Human Traffic
Natural lightings & ventilations Others
Permanent Structure
Spatial Requirements
Security
Waste disposal

DESIGN CHARACTERISTIC

MODERN-CLASSICAL STYLE

SPACE REQUIREMENTS:

1. Administrative office
 Principals office -dental clinic
 Guidance office -medical clinic
 Accounting office -conference room
 Cashiers office -file room
 Private comfort room -faculty office w/private cr
 Maintenance office -security office
2. Public comfort room for ( male & female)
3. Library w/ office for the librarian w/ adequate space for 2 staf
4. Covered Quadrangle, stage & flagpole
5. Adequate space for study areas
6. Indoor/outdoor courts & gymnasium
7. Electrical & mechanical room
8. Parking spaces
9. Motor pool
10. Chapel
11. Outdoor recreational area
12. Adequate classrooms for 3000 students
13. Laboratory rooms
14. School canteen w/ large dining area
15. AVR
16. Internet/computer laboratory
 17. OTHER AREAS FROM THE DISCRETION OF THE STUDENT

THE LOT
 NATIONAL COLLEGE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Amafel Building, Aguinaldo Highway, Dasmariñas, Cavite
Tel. No.: (046)416-6278 ● Telefax: (046)416-0166 ● Mobile No.:+63918-888-6278
www.ncst.edu.ph

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
BS Architecture Program
S.Y. 2019-2020, 1st SEMESTER

Arch.Alver A. Verzosa ,UAP

INSTRUCTOR
SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES IN DESIGN 3
NO OF SCHEDULE TYPE DISCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY
HOURS

4 Meeting # 1 LEC+LAB 1. ISSUANCE OF PLATE 1 & SUBMISSION OF

RESEARCH

3 Meeting # 2 LAB SUBMISSION & CHECKING OF PRE STUDIES

Pre Studies Requirements

-matrix diagram

-bubble diagram-zoning diagram

-schematic diagram
GENERAL
-design concept
GUIDELINES
1. Note: use 15” x 20 “ cartolina
4 Meeting # 3 LEC+LAB SUBMISSION & CHECKING OF SEMI FINAL STUDIES

Semi final requirements

-Site development plan-------acs

-Floor plans-----------------------1:200

-2 Elevations----------------------1:200

-1 Section--------------------------1:200

-Summarized Design Concept in paragraph form only

Note: use 20” x 30 “ cartolina

Avoid the hard one

3 Meeting # 4 LAB Checking & consultations

Working out with the final studies before the submission

4 Meeting # 5 LEC+LAB Checking & consultations

Working out with the final studies before the submission

3 Meeting # 6 LAB ESQUISSE 1

4 Meeting # 7 LEC+LAB Checking & consultations

Working out with the final studies before the submission

3 Meeting # 8 SUBMISSION OF FINAL STUDIES

Final Studies Requirements( improve & detailed)
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN--------ACS
FLOOR PLANS--------------------------1:200
4 ELEVATIONS--------------------------1:200
2 SECTIONS------------------------------1:200
DESIGN CONCEPT--------------------PARAGRAPH FORM ONLY NO
ILLUSTRATIONS OF ANY KIND
NORMAL 2POINT INTERIOR PERSPECTIVE FULLY
RENDERED
NORMAL 2POINT EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE FULLY
RENDERED
Note: use 20” x 30 “ cartolina

Avoid the hard one

4 Meeting # 9 LEC+LAB MAJOR EXAM

 1. *** NOTE: ALWAYS BRING YOUR DRAWING TOOLS & 20 x 30 DRAWING PAPER/S,SPECIALY DURING LABORATORY
DAYS

2. NOBODY IS ALLOWED TO ATTEND MY CLASS WITHOUT ANY DRAWING TOOLS & I DON’T TOLERATE BY
STANDERS.OR SHE/HE WILL BE MARK AS ABSENT.THE SAID LABORATORY ACTIVITIES WILL CONSIDER AS
QUIZ/SEATWORK WITH A WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF 25%.PERFORMANCE INSIDE THE ROOM WILL GRADED FROM
0( ZERO) TO 10(TEN ) POINTS.YOU WILL GET A ZERO POINTS IF YOURE DOING NOTHING OR NO DRAWING
TOOLS.DRAWING WILL BE CHECK REGULARLY BEFORE THE END OF THE SESSION.

3. AVOID NOISE & WONDERING AROUND THE CLASSROOM

4. NOT FOLLOWING ANY OF MY INSTRUCTIONS SPECIALY IN PLATES/MAJOR PLATES WILL AUTOMATICALLY GET A 20
OVER 50 P0INTS FOR THE SAID PLATE REGARDLESS OF THE WORKMANSHIP OF THE CONCERN STUDENTS.NOT
FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:

 No/Incomplete title block/or incomplete details in title block & no standard borderline/making your own
title block

 Using scales not prescribe by the professor/faculty

 Incomplete details in drawings/& incomplete drawings/INCOMPLETE REQUIREMENTS

 Inconsistent size of paper

 No names or writing your name at the back of the paper.

 Using diferent color of papers

 Incomplete space requirements.

 Not using the prescribe medium for the perspective & drafting

 Wrong spelling of faculty’s full name specially my surname.

 Giving other requirements that is not included in my requirements.

 SUBMISSION OF PLATE BEYOND THE DEADLINE

 Poor workmanship.

 Not using the prescribe drafting alphabet of lines

 NOT PROPERLY FASTEN OR FOLDED

 Doing short cuts to the drawing requirements.

 Not following my VERY SIMPLE INSTRUCTIONS.

NOTE: IGNORANCE TO THE RULES & GUIDELINES IS NOT AN OPTION AND NEVER BE AN EXCUSE.IF YOURE DISAGREE
WITH MY INSTRUCTIONS/RULES YOUR FREE TO DROPPED MY SUBJECT

WEIGHTED AVERAGE LECTURE LABORATORY

25% QUIZ/SEATWORK QUIZ/LABORATORY

ACTIVITY/PRE-STUDIES

10% ATTENDANCE ATTENDANCE

RECITATIONS RECITATION

10% RESEARCH/ASSIGNMENT RESEARCH

15% LONGQUIZ ESQUIZZE

PROJECT/NOTEBOOK SEMI-FINAL STUDIES

40% PRACTICAL/WRITTEN EXAM FINAL STUDIES

100% TOTAL

NATIONAL COLLEGE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Amafel Building, Aguinaldo Highway, Dasmariñas, Cavite
Tel. No.: (046)416-6278 ● Telefax: (046)416-0166 ● Mobile No.:+63918-888-6278
www.ncst.edu.ph

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
BS Architecture Program
S.Y. 2019-2020, 1ST Semester
Arch.Alver A. Verzosa ,UAP
INSTRUCTOR
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 3
DESIGN PROBLEM: A CATHOLIC SECONDARY SCHOOL BUILDING”

GRADING CRITERIA
PROJECT LESS FAIRLY VERY EXCEPTIONALLY SCORE
ISSUES EVIDENT EDVIDENT EVIDENT EVIDENT
(50-74%) (75-83) (84-91) (92-100)
 ACCEPTABILITY AND Work did not reflect Design concept was Design concept was Design concept was very
SUCCESSFUL any design expressed, clearly relate to the clearly
TRANSLATION OF concept/ character; although its Design Philosophy, related to the Design
THE DESIGN the work had no relationship to the Explained and Philosophy,
CONCEPT 10% conceptual basis Design Philosophy and translated in the work, well-explained and
its with very minor successfully
translation had inconsistencies translated in the work
obvious
inconsistencies
5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 10
SOUNDNESS OF THE Work did not show There was an attempt The site was well-
SITE DE’VT any logical to put the site in order planned, site
PLAN: TRAFFIC planning approach or but a number of constraints were The planning solution
CIRCULATION, strategy incoherent solutions solved, demonstrated an
SEGREGATION, were committed maximized the site exemplary
ZONING OF AREAS, potentials but have example of good site
LANDSCAPING 15% some minor flaws planning in all aspects
7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 14 14.5 15
10 10.5 11
SOUNDNESS & The work showed The work showed an The work was well- The work was very
CREATIVITY OF poor and attempt to designed, impressive,
THEFLOOR PLANS: unacceptable layout of design; spaces were coherent, followed the almost faultless, exhibited
IRCULATION, floor plans logically standards freshideas in designing and
SEGREGATION, acceptable but had nd codes but was had
ZONING OF AREAS violation of observed to have consistently followed the
35% design standards, bldg some very minor codes
code and design faults and standards
other related national /
local laws
17 18 19 20 21 22 26 26.5 27 27.5 28 30 30.5 31 31.5 32 32.5 33 33.5 34 34.5 35
23 24 25 28.5 29
INNOVATIVE AND The work showed The work showed an The work was well- The work was very
EFFECTIVE poor and attempt to designed, impressive,
INTERPRETATION OF inconsistent design the vertical coherent, but was almost faultless, exhibited
ELEVATIONS interpretation of aspect; logically observed to have fresh
AND SECTIOND elevations and sections acceptable but had some very minor ideas in designing and had
BASED ON THE inconsistencies design faults onsistently followed the
DESIGN CONCEPT with the floor plans codes and
20% standards
10 11 12 13 14 15 15.5 16 16.5 17 17.5 18 18.5 19 19.5 20
COMPETENT The work showed The work showed an The work was well- The work was very
TRANSLATION OF poor and attempt to designed, impressive,
EXTERIOR AND inconsistent interpret the design in coherent, but was almost faultless, exhibited
INTERIOR interpretation of 3– observed to have fresh
PERSPECTIVES 10% exterior and interior dimensional form but some very minor ideas in designing and
perspectives had design faults rendering 3-
inconsistencies with dimensional images
the floor plans,
elevations and sections
5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 10
OVERALL The work did not The work met the The work was The presentation was very
CORRECTNESS OF observe drafting minimum commendable, neat, commendable, well-
DRAWINGS AND standards, untidy, and acceptable design impressive but had presented,
CREATIVITY OF did not meet presentation, but some minor very neat and had no
PRESENTATION 10% basic acceptable had a number of drafting errors drafting
presentation drafting errors errors
5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 10
TOTAL SCORE

COMMENTS:________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________

_____AR ALVER A. VERZOSA,UAP____

PRINTED NAME AND SIGNITURE OF FACULTY