Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
AQUA A. MAN,
Plaintiff,
On July 20, 2019, the plaintiff sent a written final demand letter
to the defendant, again, ordering him to vacate the premises, hereto
marked as Exhibit “C”. However, the defendant refused to vacate the
house unit and even invited relatives to stay with him. A copy of the
written testimony of Mr. Mario Maurer, who served the same demand
letter is attached and marked hereto as Exhibit “D”.
Before filing the complaint, this dispute has been referred to the
Lupong Tagapamayapa of Brgy. 25, Tacloban City, but no settlement
has been reached, hereto marked as Exhibit “E”.
ISSUE
DISCUSSIONS
-----------
DEFENDANT SHOULD BE EJECTED
FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
-----------
In the case of Ocampo vs. Tirona, the High Court ruled that in
unlawful detainer cases, the FACT OF LEASE AND EXPIRATION OR
VIOLATION OF ITS TERMS should be proved and resolved.
2
PRAYER/ RELIEF
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.
Tacloban City, August 7, 2019
ATTY. KA LABAN
Counsel for the Defendant
Rm. 3 2/F Philam Life Building
Brgy. 25, Tacloban City
3
VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATE OF NON-FORUM SHOPPING
AQUA A. MAN
Affiant
DOC. NO._______
PAGE NO._______ NOTARY PUBLIC
BOOK NO._______
SERIES OF 2019.
ATTY. MIKAELA TAN
Notary Public until December 30, 2019
Rm. 4 2/F Philam Life Building
Brgy. 25, Tacloban City
Roll of Attorneys No. 42481
PTR No. 18909595, July 1, 2017, Tacloban City
IBP No. 693095, July 1, 2017, Tacloban City
MCLE Compliance No. IV-0009876, 07/02/2017
Mikaela.tan@gmail.com