Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
sources?
The Story…
John Woodson, the protagonist, has planned a rendezvous with Charlene, a lady he
has not seen in six years. She claims to have some mysterious information for him –
information concerning a recently discovered ancient manuscript dating back to the
year 600 BC. When they later meet, Charlene further informs Woodson that this
manuscript, discovered in Peru, is said to contain within it at least nine great insights
concerning the spiritual development, the evolutionary future, and the ultimate goal of
the human race. This manuscript also predicts a massive transformation in human
society, commencing in the last decades of the 20th Century. According to this
manuscript, the human race will sequentially move through the enclosed insights to
reach a higher (or even the highest) vibrational and spiritual state of being.
Conveniently, Charlene knows of the first insight, and tells Woodson that this insight
manifests first as restlessness, and then the realization of the importance of, and the
real reason behind, coincidence. Not long after his meeting with Charlene, Woodson
is on a plane to Peru to uncover more information about the rest of the manuscript.
The story progresses as a kind of a treasure hunt, a new treasure (insight) being found
by Woodson in every chapter, as he not-so-deftly dodges and defies the Peruvian
government in a stream of nauseating coincidence!
The Analysis
An introduction to this book defines the content as a ‘parable’ – that is, a fictional
story with moral teachings. Classically, parables tend to be a little farfetched but do
serve the purpose I have just mentioned – and this book is no different. From the get
go, the novel is painfully unrealistic – the major reason being that Redfield wastes no
time in incorporating the first insight (that of coincidence) into the plot. Characters
and plot twists pop up as convenient – symbols and farce are the flavour of the day,
and are used à tort et à travers. This particular parable pulls out all the stops to make
its points. If this is not your style, then you are in for a rocky ride.
Redfield begins to relay his major theories of energy in the third insight, and
continues throughout the rest of the book. Some are original and reasonably
interesting – some are quite the opposite. Take the third insight, for instance – the
notion that an energetic force imbues and surrounds all living forms, and that it can be
visualized and interpreted. Strangely, Redfield never once in his lengthy discourse
mentions the word ‘aura’. Either this word was invented post-the1994publication, or
Redfield wanted the idea to seem like his own. At this point in the parable, the
storyline had descended to the ridiculous. The protagonist didn’t seem to have any
mind or logic of his own, and was instead riding the wave of serendipity. In short,
there was a scarcity of intelligence in plot construction, and I wasn’t finding the
insights were compensating well at all.
The book improved ever so slightly here, though. This is the point Redfield at which
begins to theorize about the exchange of energy between humans and other humans,
and humans and nature – all in the context of the fictional parable. My tolerance for
outlandish twists also seemed to improve over the next fifty pages and couple of
insights!
Redfield’s thoughts on the exchange of energy are quite readable. Naturally, all are
unsubstantiated theories, as the existence of such an energy is also unsubstantiated by
conventional science - but I have to say that his theories could match up with many
day-to-day human interactions. The following presented ‘insights’ basically serve as
Redfield’s voice on the issue. One particulars insight talks of conflict, and explains
how all human conflict is a power struggle for energy – energy being ‘won’ when one
has the upper hand. This insight says that such power struggles are only necessary
because many humans are not in touch with the natural force (God?), and therefore
must muster energy in other ways.
Another insight serves to propose how humans act to win such energy from others. In
short, this insight says that all humans have a ‘control drama’, an act that each of us
formulated in childhood to win back some of the energy being sapped from us by
parental demands, corrections, and imperfections. The four control dramas are
explained to be ‘The Intimidator’, ‘The Interrogator’, ‘Aloof’, and ‘Poor Me’.
Redfield writes of the interactions between such control dramas in a convincing
manner - although such interactions could simply be considered basic psychology,
rather than anything to do with an unseen energy. Take the interrogator, for example, a
person that likes to control (and hence sap energy from others) by pointing out their
faults. This can be counteracted by an ‘Aloof’ personality which ignores and
condescends to such an attack – and so, energy is regained. Power struggle number
one. As a second example, take the intimidator, a person that resorts to threats on a
person’s physical safety. This is only poorly counteracted by an aloof personality, so a
‘Poor Me’ personality evolves – a person that brings out the violins and makes the
intimidator feel guilty, thereby retrieving energy. An intimidator could also be
counteracted by an intimidator, but this could be quite a violent stand-off (drunken
brawls spring to mind). Redfield says that intimidators inevitably produce poor-me or
intimidator children, while an interrogator parent often produces aloof children. He
mentions other combinations of control dramas as well, but I don’t have the space to
go through them all. Ultimately, he claims that energetic power struggles like these
lower our spiritual and 'vibrational' state of being.
The fictional story winds onwards as each of the nine insights are revealed in turn. As
I got used to the incorporation of the insights into the storyline, my ability to tolerate
the book did increase a little – with some of the insights, the fictional work in parallel
was useful in clarifying some of the author’s points. Overall, this book was an okay
read, simply due to the four or five insights that made me think (a little). The fictional
personalities of the characters all fall in line with the insights, however, and we only
get to see traits relevant to the current insight at hand. This means that the characters
lack complexity and the storyline wanders many times to the predictable (even if the
persisting use of coincidence allows for some surprises!) Don't hold you breath for the
final couple of insights either - they are wishful thinking taken to the extreme, and not
credible in the least.