Sei sulla pagina 1di 5

[Downloaded free from http://www.indianjpsychiatry.org on Thursday, May 16, 2019, IP: 36.76.81.

25]

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Internet addiction and daytime sleepiness among professionals in India:


A web‑based survey
Lokesh Kumar Singh, K. Hari Hara Suchandra, Amrit Pattajoshi1, Spoorthy Sai Mamidipalli, Huma Kamal2,
Sharda Singh, Bhoomika Sachacher3, Varun Mehta4
Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, 2Department of Psychiatry, Pt. J.N.M Medical College,
Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 1Department of Psychiatry, Hi Tech Medical College and Hospital, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha,
3
Department of Psychiatry, Amity University, 4Department of Psychiatry, Central Institute of Psychiatry, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

ABSTRACT

Background: The likelihood of the relation between Internet overuse and comorbid psychiatric conditions is on the
rise. However, sleep disturbances are common psychiatric symptoms associated with internet overuse. Our objective
was to examine the association of Internet overuse with excessive daytime sleepiness, sleep problems in professionals
from India.
Materials and Methods: This was a web‑based cross‑sectional study through a predesigned questionnaire which
included various professional groups. The information included in the questionnaire was sociodemographic details,
Young’s internet addiction test (IAT) and Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS).
Results: About 1.0% of total sample population had severe internet addiction whereas 13% were in the range of
moderate internet addiction and the mean score on IAT was found to be 32 (standard deviation [SD] = 16.42). The mean
duration of total night time sleep (5.61 ± 1.17) is significantly lower in participants with moderate and severe internet
addiction (6.98 ± 1.12) compared to those with no and mild internet addiction. The mean scores of ESS were significantly
higher in individuals with moderate and severe addiction (M = 10.64, SD = 4.79). We found that sleepiness while in 5
of the situations such as driving a car ( χ2 = 27.67; P < 0.001), sitting and reading ( χ2 = 13.6; P = 0.004), traveling in a
car ( χ2 = 15.09; P = 0.002), afternoon rest time ( χ2 = 15.75; P = 0.001), and postlunch quiet time ( χ2 = 24.09; P < 0.001),
predicted membership to moderate‑to‑severe internet addiction, even after controlling for the confounding effects of
age and gender.
Conclusions: This study shows an association between Internet overuse, excessive daytime sleepiness, and other sleep
problems. Clinicians should be proactive and conscious in scrutinizing the patients for internet addiction and its consequences.

Key words: Addiction, internet, sleep

INTRODUCTION

Internet is no longer just used for educational and research


Address for correspondence: Dr. Spoorthy Sai Mamidipalli, purposes unlike in the past. Over the years because of
Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences,
Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
E‑mail: saispoorthy.m@gmail.com This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of
the Creative Commons Attribution‑NonCommercial‑ShareAlike 4.0 License,
which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non‑commercially,
Access this article online as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under
the identical terms.
Quick Response Code
Website: For reprints contact: reprints@medknow.com
www.indianjpsychiatry.org

How to cite this article: Singh LK, Suchandra KH, Pattajoshi A,


DOI:
Mamidipalli SS, Kamal H, Singh S, et al. Internet addiction and
daytime sleepiness among professionals in India: A web-based
10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_412_18
survey. Indian J Psychiatry 2019;61:265-9.

© 2019 Indian Journal of Psychiatry | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 265


[Downloaded free from http://www.indianjpsychiatry.org on Thursday, May 16, 2019, IP: 36.76.81.25]

Singh, et al.: Internet addiction and day time sleep

accessibility and affordability, the number of users has respective devices that way maintaining authenticity of the
increased day‑by‑day. With 2 billion global users, in India, sample. The information included in the questionnaire was
there were a predicted total of 354 million internet users sociodemographic details, Young’s internet addiction test
in 2015.[1] Adolescents and young adults are especially at (IAT)[20] and the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS).[21] For the IAT,
increased risk for internet addiction and its consequences we used 5 point Likert scale (1 = rarely, 2 = occasionally,
compared to the elderly.[2] 3 = frequently, 4 = often, and 5 = always); total scores
ranging from 20 to 100.  Final responses were analyzed
Internet addiction has been defined as “excessive or using the appropriate statistical method.
poorly controlled preoccupations, urges or behaviors
regarding computer use and internet access that lead to The purpose of the present study was to examine the
impairment or distress.”[3] Although there are controversies association of Internet overuse with EDS in professionals
over use of the term “addition,”[4] and many prefer to use from India.
terms ‑ “problematic internet use,”[5] “excessive internet
use,”[6] etc., all of these terms convey similar implications. RESULTS
Overall, this condition is defined as the inability of
individuals to control the internet use, resulting in marked Out of the 2015 responses received, 233 were excluded
distress and/or functional impairment in daily life.[7‑9] due to incomplete responses. Hence, the overall sample
included was 1782 [Figure 1]. Out of this sample, the groups
Since the time Goldberg[10] introduced the term “internet we included were doctors, students (nursing and MBBS),
addiction,” there is growing interest in this field. Multitude and other professionals.
of studies conducted till date studied the prevalence,
risk factors and consequences of internet addiction.[11,12] Sociodemographic data
However, the gray zone still persists as it has not been given In the final sample of 1782 completers of the online survey,
place in the existing classificatory systems such as DSM‑5. 58.4% (n = 1040) were male, 41.6% (n = 742) were female.
The only behavioral addiction considered in the DSM‑5 is The mean age group was found to be 27.7 years. About
the internet gaming disorder under conditions requiring 27.4% were doctors (Post MBBS, PGs), 38.3% were students,
further study.[13] and 34.3% included other professionals. The proportion
of individuals who stayed at home (n = 876%–49.2%) and
With the increase in time spent in the internet use various away from home (n = 906%–50.8%) was almost similar in
studies showed relation between growing internet use and the current sample. Most commonly used gadget was
comorbid psychiatric issues such as loneliness, depression, mobile phone (n = 1611, 90.4%) followed by desktop/laptop
harm avoidance, anxiety symptoms, impulsivity, and (n = 171, 9.6%).
attention‑deficit–hyperactivity disorder.[14‑16] Furthermore,
individuals with excessive internet usage have less time to Scores of internet addiction and it is relation to sleep
sleep and feel tired more often than not. Excessive daytime The mean score on Young’s IAT is 32 (standard
sleepiness (EDS) is associated with impaired workplace deviation = 16.42), indicating that the most of the population
performance, injuries, and risk of drowsy driving.[17] Studies was within the average user range. About 1.0% of the total
addressing this issue of internet overuse and EDS have sample population had significant problems with internet
been rarely carried out in India. A few studies available till usage, whereas 13% were in the range of frequent/occasional
date tell us about the prevalence of internet overuse in
professional groups[18,19] where workplace functioning is of
utmost importance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a web‑based survey conducted between January


and February 2018 (2 months) through predesigned online
questionnaire (www.surveymonkey.com). The questionnaire
was circulated by using E‑mails, WhatsApp, Facebook,
other messenger applications by the investigators of four
medical colleges to their contacts, who included various
professional groups such as teachers, engineers, nurses,
and students. The study commenced after taking approval
from Ethics Committee. The target population included
was between 18 and 65 years of age, of either gender. The Figure 1: Flow diagram illustrating inclusion of samples in the
respondents could fill the survey only once through their study

266 Indian Journal of Psychiatry Volume 61, Issue 3, May-June 2019


[Downloaded free from http://www.indianjpsychiatry.org on Thursday, May 16, 2019, IP: 36.76.81.25]

Singh, et al.: Internet addiction and day time sleep

problems, 62.9% of the sample were average internet users. It was also found that the participants with moderate‑severe
About 23% of the sample scored even <20 suggestive of internet addiction had significantly high chance of dozing in
having no problem with their internet use. all the eight situations listed out on ESS [Table 2].

To test our primary objective, we divided the overall sample RESULTS OF LOGISTIC REGRESSION
based on IAT scores into two categories ‑ none and mild
(includes those with IAT scores <20 and 20–49), moderate A logistic regression analysis was conducted with levels
and severe (includes those with IAT scores 50–79 and 80–100). of internet addiction (no or mild level of addiction as one
group; moderate or severe level of addiction as other group)
Sleep disturbances and internet addiction severity as dependent variables, ESS categories as independent
In this study, the total sleep duration of the participants variables with age and gender as covariates. We found that
ranged between 4 and 10 h, whereas the mean sleep duration sleepiness while in 5 of the situations such as driving a car
was found to be 6.7 h. About 66.2% reported some form of (2 = 27.67; P < 0.001), sitting and reading (2 = 13.6;
sleep disturbances. Among this lack of freshness after sleep P  = 0.004), travelling in a car (2 = 15.09; = 0.002),
was seen in majority (24.6%) followed by difficulty initiating afternoon rest time (2 = 15.75; P = 0.001), and postlunch
sleep (17.9%), difficulty maintaining sleep (12.7%), and early quiet time (2 = 24.09; P < 0.001), predicted membership
morning awakening (11%), respectively. to moderate to severe internet addiction, even after
controlling for the confounding effects of age and gender.
This model produced an overall Cox and Snell pseudo
As shown in Table 1, we can understand that the mean
R2 = 0.139 (2 = 266.01; P < 0.001).
duration of total nighttime sleep is significantly lower in
participants with moderate and severe internet addiction
DISCUSSION
compared to those with no and mild internet addiction.
Furthermore, we found out that participants with nighttime
The current study determined the prevalence of internet
sleep disturbances had significantly higher severity of addiction and patterns of EDS among professionals in
internet addiction. When different types of sleep problems India. This study has also provided an estimate of the sleep
were compared between both severity groups, lack of problems among the respondents.
freshness of sleep was significantly higher in the moderate
and severe addicts group compared to no and mild addicts. The relation between sleep and excessive internet usage
All other types of sleep problems such as getting up earlier forms a vicious cycle. Several hypotheses put forward predict
than intended, intermittent awakenings, difficulty falling that excessive exposure to the light emitting diodes screens
asleep were found to be at a similar rate across different particularly before bedtime, disrupts the biological clock
levels of severity of internet addiction. and the circadian rhythm, thus leading to a phase delay and
a slowing of melatonin secretion.[22] According to existing
Findings from Epworth sleepiness scale literature, the consequences of this phase shift leads to leads to
The mean scores of Epworth sleepiness scores were sleep disturbances with later bedtimes, shorter sleep duration,
significantly higher in individuals with moderate and severe diurnal hypersomnolence, and headaches.[23,24] However, the
addiction. These findings suggest that the higher the vice‑versa is also true, individuals who are predisposed to
internet addiction the more it cause interference in daytime sleep disturbances or have existing sleep disturbances are
alertness [Table 2]. likely to use internet as a measure to distract.[25]

Table 1: Sleep disturbances and relation to internet addiction


Variables Yes/no Mean±SD/n; n (%) t‑test/χ2 (P)
No‑mild severe Moderate‑severe
Duration of sleep at night (h) ‑ 6.98±1.12 5.61±1.17 17.74 (<0.001)
Sleep disturbances Yes 974 (63.6) 205 (82) 32.58 (<0.001)
No 558 (36.4) 45 (18)
Most common sleep problem
Falling asleep Yes 277 (18.1) 42 (16.8) 0.24 (0.624)
No 1255 (81.9) 208 (83.2)
Intermittent awakenings Yes 195 (12.7) 31 (12.4) 0.02 (0.885)
No 1337 (87.2) 219 (87.6)
Getting up earlier than intended Yes 163 (10.6) 33 (13.2) 1.44 (0.230)
No 1369 (89.4) 217 (86.8)
Lack of freshness after sleep Yes 339 (22.1) 100 (40) 35.39 (<0.001)
No 1193 (77.9) 150 (60)
SD – Standard deviation

Indian Journal of Psychiatry Volume 61, Issue 3, May-June 2019 267


[Downloaded free from http://www.indianjpsychiatry.org on Thursday, May 16, 2019, IP: 36.76.81.25]

Singh, et al.: Internet addiction and day time sleep

Table 2: Relation between Epworth Sleepiness Scores and internet addiction scores
Variable n; n (%)/mean±SD χ2 (P)
None and mild Moderate and severe
ESS total 6.97 (3.89) (n=1532) 10.64 (4.79) (n=250) 13.34 (<0.001)
While in a vehicle, while stopped for a few minutes in traffic
Would never doze 1215 (79.3) 126 (50.4) 133.35 (<0.001)
Slight chance of dozing 223 (14.6) 61 (24.4)
Moderate chance of dozing 68 (4.4) 36 (14.4)
High chance of dozing 26 (1.7) 27 (10.8)
While sitting and reading
Would never doze 512 (33.4) 41 (16.4) 123.08 (<0.001)
Slight chance of dozing 651 (42.5) 77 (30.8)
Moderate chance of dozing 281 (18.3) 73 (29.2)
High chance of dozing 88 (5.7) 59 (23.6)
While watching TV
Would never doze 717 (46.8) 102 (40.8) 44.16 (<0.001)
Slight chance of dozing 552 (36.0) 69 (27.6)
Moderate chance of dozing 201 (13.1) 46 (18.4)
High chance of dozing 62 (4.0) 33 (13.2)
While sitting inactive in a public place (e.g., a theater or a meeting)
Would never doze 745 (48.6) 84 (33.6) 74.51 (<0.001)
Slight chance of dozing 530 (34.6) 76 (30.4)
Moderate chance of dozing 189 (12.3) 47 (18.8)
High chance of dozing 68 (4.4) 43 (17.2)
While as a passenger in a car for an hour without a break
Would never doze 470 (30.7) 56 (22.4) 26.13 (<0.001)
Slight chance of dozing 532 (34.7) 72 (28.8)
Moderate chance of dozing 331 (21.6) 62 (24.8)
High chance of dozing 199 (13.0) 60 (24.0)
While lying down to rest in the afternoon when circumstances permit
Would never doze 205 (13.4) 24 (9.6) 40.92 (<0.001)
Slight chance of dozing 444 (29.0) 55 (22.0)
Moderate chance of dozing 471 (30.7) 54 (21.6)
High chance of dozing 412 (26.9) 117 (46.8)
While sitting and talking to someone
Would never doze 1217 (79.4) 129 (51.6) 127.08 (<0.001)
Slight chance of dozing 229 (14.9) 63 (25.2)
Moderate chance of dozing 71 (4.6) 39 (15.6)
High chance of dozing 15 (1) 19 (7.6)
While sitting quietly after a lunch without alcohol
Would never doze 488 (31.9) 49 (19.6) 63.94 (<0.001)
Slight chance of dozing 560 (36.6) 70 (28.0)
Moderate chance of dozing 324 (21.1) 63 (25.2)
High chance of dozing 160 (10.4) 68 (27.2)
SD – Standard deviation; ESS – Epworth Sleepiness Scale

The excessive amount of time spent online may directly on adolescents and school going children. Moreover, the
reduce the total sleep time leading to a diagnosis of sleep‑related variables were assessed using semi‑structured
insomnia. Time spent online, although not assessed questionnaires.[17,27‑30]
separately, is the basis for 6 (out of 20) items (i.e., 01, 02,
05, 06, 17, and 19) of the IAT, the scale used in our study. In our study, we found that the presence of sleep
Moreover, validity studies conducting factor analysis also disturbances and lack of freshness after sleep were
have found “time” to be a major factor.[26] Studies done till significantly higher among those with higher levels of
date to evaluate the relation between social media/internet internet addiction (moderate‑severe group). Furthermore,
usage and sleep have shown that excessive use of screen the duration of night sleep was significantly lower in
leads to sleep‑related consequences such as getting to respondents with higher levels of internet addiction. These
bed later in the night, needing more time to fall asleep, findings are similar to the studies done in India till now.[31]
increased number of awakenings in the night, and difficulty However, as to our knowledge, this is the first study from
in waking up and feelings of sleepiness in day. In addition, India focusing on internet addiction, sleep disturbances,
sleep quality of individuals with higher scores on internet and EDS. A few studies done from India assessing internet
addiction scale was worse when compared to those with a addiction and psychiatric comorbidities showed relation
lower score. However, these studies were mainly focused of internet overuse and personality characteristics,[32]

268 Indian Journal of Psychiatry Volume 61, Issue 3, May-June 2019


[Downloaded free from http://www.indianjpsychiatry.org on Thursday, May 16, 2019, IP: 36.76.81.25]

Singh, et al.: Internet addiction and day time sleep

depression, anxiety, well‑being, and functioning.[19,33,34] CMAJ 1996;154:1882‑3.


10. Goldberg I. Internet Addictive Disorder (IAD) Diagnostic Criteria. Available
We could not find any study from India that assessed the from: https://www.psycom.net/iadcriteria.html. [Last accessed on
relation between daytime sleepiness and internet addiction 2018 Oct 02].
11. Nath K, Naskar S, Victor R. A cross‑sectional study on the prevalence,
using validated scale. risk factors, and ill effects of internet addiction among medical students
in northeastern India. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2016;18.
Our study is not without limitations. Predominantly, online DOI: 10.4088/PCC.15m01909.
12. Billieux  J, Maurage  P, Lopez‑Fernandez  O, Kuss  DJ, Griffiths  MD. Can
nature of the study might have picked up the sample which disordered mobile phone use be considered a behavioral addiction?
used internet more compared to other population. Although An update on current evidence and a comprehensive model for future
research. Curr Addict Rep 2015a; 2:156‑62.
we tried to include population from all the age groups, the 13. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
predominant age group of the final sample was between of Mental Disorders (DSM‑5). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric
25 and 30 years thus limiting the representativeness of Association; 2013.
14. Carli V, Durkee T, Wasserman D, Hadlaczky G, Despalins R, Kramarz E,
the sample. As it was a cross‑sectional study, no causal et al. The association between pathological internet use and comorbid
relationships could be ascertained from the same. psychopathology: A systematic review. Psychopathology 2013;46:1‑3.
15. Ko CH, Yen JY, Chen CS, Yeh YC, Yen CF. Predictive values of psychiatric
symptoms for internet addiction in adolescents: A 2‑year prospective
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009;163:937‑43.
16. Weidman AC, Fernandez KC, Levinson CA, Augustine AA, Larsen RJ,
Rodebaugh TL, et al. Compensatory internet use among individuals
Internet has revolutionized various fields such as education, higher in social anxiety and its implications for well‑being. Pers Individ Dif
marketing, and social communication and so the number 2012;53:191‑5.
17. Choi K, Son H, Park M, Han J, Kim K, Lee B, et al. Internet overuse and
of internet users is increasing exponentially every year. excessive daytime sleepiness in adolescents. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci
Developing countries like India are not an exception to this. 2009;63:455‑62.
18. Grover S, Chakraborty K, Basu D. Pattern of internet use among
India lacks in literature on Internet addiction compared to professionals in India: Critical look at a surprising survey result. Ind
western literature thereby showing the lack of awareness Psychiatry J 2010;19:94‑100.
and also the need for more research in this field. The present 19. Goel D, Subramanyam A, Kamath R. A study on the prevalence of internet
addiction and its association with psychopathology in Indian adolescents.
study identifies the association between Internet overuse, Indian J Psychiatry 2013;55:140‑3.
EDS, and other sleep problems. As the number of Internet 20. Young K. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder.
Cyberpsychol Behav 1996;3:237‑44.
addicts will continue to grow, clinicians should be proactive 21. Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: The epworth
in examining Internet addiction in cases of EDS. sleepiness scale. Sleep 1991;14:540‑5.
22. Touitou Y, Touitou D, Reinberg A. Disruption of adolescents’ circadian
clock: The vicious circle of media use, exposure to light at night, sleep
Future studies should focus upon studying daytime sleep loss and risk behaviors. J Physiol Paris 2016;110:467‑79.
as a mediator between internet addiction and work 23. Chang AM, Aeschbach D, Duffy JF, Czeisler CA. Evening use of
light‑emitting eReaders negatively affects sleep, circadian timing, and
performance in professionals. next‑morning alertness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015;112:1232‑7.
24. Lemola S, Perkinson‑Gloor N, Brand S, Dewald‑Kaufmann JF,
Financial support and sponsorship Grob A. Adolescents’ electronic media use at night, sleep disturbance,
and depressive symptoms in the smartphone age. J Youth Adolesc
Nil. 2015;44:405‑18.
25. Lam LT. Internet gaming addiction, problematic use of the internet, and
sleep problems: A systematic review. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2014;16:444.
Conflicts of interest 26. Fernández‑Villa T, Molina AJ, García‑Martín M, Llorca J,
There are no conflicts of interest. Delgado‑Rodríguez M, Martín V, et al. Validation and psychometric
analysis of the internet addiction test in Spanish among college students.
BMC Public Health 2015;15:953.
REFERENCES 27. Li JB, Lau JT, Mo PK, Su XF, Tang J, Qin ZG, et al. Insomnia partially
mediated the association between problematic internet use and
1. Alawadhi N. India’s internet user base 354 million, registers 17% growth depression among secondary school students in China. J Behav Addict
in first 6 months of 2015: IAMAI report. Economic Times; 3 September, 2017;6:554‑63.
2015. Available from: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/ 28. Ekinci Ö, Çelik T, Savaş N, Toros F. Association between internet use and
indias-internet-user-base-354-million-registers-17-growth-in-first-6- sleep problems in adolescents. Noro Psikiyatr Ars 2014;51:122‑8.
months-of-2015-iamai-report/articleshow/48780291.cms. [Last retrieved 29. Dube N, Khan K, Loehr S, Chu Y, Veugelers P. The use of entertainment
on 2018 Sep 19]. and communication technologies before sleep could affect sleep and
2. Aslanidou S, Menexes G. Youth and the Internet: Uses and practices in weight status: A population‑based study among children. Int J Behav Nutr
the home. Comput Educ 2008;51:1375‑91. Phys Act 2017;14:97.
3. Shaw  M, Black  DW. Internet addiction: Definition, assessment, 30. Royant‑Parola S, Londe V, Tréhout S, Hartley S. The use of social media
epidemiology and clinical management. CNS Drugs 2008;22:353‑65. modifies teenagers’ sleep‑related behavior. Encephale 2018;44:321‑8.
4. Ryding  FC, Kaye  LK. “Internet addiction”: A  conceptual minefield. Int J 31. Shrivastava A, Sharma MK, Marimuthu P. Internet use at workplaces
Ment Health Addict 2018;16:225‑32. and its effects on working style in Indian context: An exploration. Indian J
5. Spada MM. An overview of problematic internet use. Addict Behav Occup Environ Med 2016;20:88‑94.
2014;39:3‑6. 32. Saini VK, Baniya GC, Verma KK, Soni A, Kesharwani S. A study on
6. Weinstein A, Lejoyeux M. Internet addiction or excessive internet use. Am relationship of internet addictive behavior with personality traits among
J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2010;36:277‑83. medical students. J Mental Health Hum Behav 2016;21:108‑11.
7. Young KS. Psychology of computer use: XL. Addictive use of the internet: 33. Nalwa K, Anand AP. Internet addiction in students: A cause of concern.
A case that breaks the stereotype. Psychol Rep 1996;79:899‑902. Cyberpsychol Behav 2003;6:653‑6.
8. Mitchell P. Internet addiction: Genuine diagnosis or not? Lancet 34. Yadav P, Banwari G, Parmar C, Maniar R. Internet addiction and
2000;355:632. its correlates among high school students: A preliminary study from
9. OReilly M. Internet addiction: A new disorder enters the medical lexicon. Ahmedabad, India. Asian J Psychiatr 2013;6:500‑5.

Indian Journal of Psychiatry Volume 61, Issue 3, May-June 2019 269

Potrebbero piacerti anche