Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
METHODOLOGY 04
CONTENTS
KEY FINDINGS 05
SOCIAL HIRING
CHALLENGES 12
BENEFITS OF
SOCIAL HIRING 19
RECOMMENDATIONS 21
CONCLUSION 22
EXECUTIVE
” SUMMARY
In the last few years, social media has emerged as the new town center of the online
world where people visit, interact and engage, o en. With more and more tech-
YOU CAN’T savvy millennials and Gen-Z employees joining the workforce, social hiring has
flourished as the most prominent, probably the only, preferred employment
TEACH pla orm. TopCHRO conducted a survey to know the extent, impact and modes of
EMPLOYEES this pla orm.
TO SMILE. THEY The survey was designed to get maximum diverse views and was floated across a
HAVE TO SMILE range of industries and regions. Its interpreta on in this report is limited to
BEFORE YOU prominent observa ons and major devia ons. The results have been approximated
HIRE THEM. and should not be taken as exact numbers. To get the exact picture, numbers and
understanding of the method, a detailed and broad study is advised.
”
©2019. TopCHRO. All Rights Reserved. 03
METHODOLOGY
5.14%
Not so
Important
Social hiring is a must for 66.09% of the
11.64% respondents and is well-integrated in the systems:
Most
Important
Use and effec veness of social hiring are
54.45%
indisputable. 11.64% of the organiza ons say social
Very hiring is most important for them and 54.45% say
Important
social hiring is very important for them. Though
most organiza ons use social hiring, there is a
28.77% striking ambiguity in its use and different
Moderately
Important
organiza ons are using it differently and for
different purposes.
By asking them to
fill social media forms 12.3% Big Companies Are Making Bigger
Investments in Social Hiring:
By asking them to upload
resume directly through 39.4% A notable shi is building in large
social media
organiza ons. Only 53.9% of organiza ons are
By redirec ng to the now redirec ng applicants to their career site.
company’s career site 53.9% 12.3% have adopted social media forms. They
are now turning to social hiring for a rac ng
By asking candidates to talent and popularizing their company culture.
mail their resume 52.6%
The bigger chunk of small and mid-size
organiza ons pie is invested in recruitment.
By asking candidates to
message on social media 25.5% Small and mid-level organiza ons need to
explore more poten al uses of social hiring
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 like branding and job adver sing.
Though many hiring mechanisms are available, not all of them are uniformly used. While social media and group pos ngs are widely used,
others not so much despite their ease and efficiency.
Social media:
LinkedIn 94.88% Instagram 17.75%
Facebook helps in targe ng demography, interest
and, skills and, LinkedIn validates the candidate’s
Facebook 51.54% Whatsapp experience and skills. Twi er is being used to
4.78%
target candidates based on their interest. 94.88%
of respondents are using LinkedIn which makes it
the most popular hiring pla orm.
Twi er 21.16% Myspace 3.07%
Employers Perspec ve: Are Chatbots Beneficial? Employers Perspec ve: Should ATS be integrated
with social pla orms?
No 29.11% No 43.80%
Yes 69.86% Yes 56.30%
Chatbots: 69.86% of respondents find ATS: 56.30% of respondents say ATS should
chatbots useful. Only 16.10% of organiza ons be integrated with social pla orms for
have included chatbots in their website’s effec ve social hiring. Respondents find
career sec on. But the ones that have used linking ATS with social pla orms effec ve yet
chatbots have found them effec ve. cumbersome since it is to be done manually.
Post jobs for Create a job pos ng Ask internal Ask for Include Chat Send direct
specific roles in on the company’s employees to share referrals bots on the website’s messages to
relevant group page jobs in their profiles career sec on poten al candidates
The popularity of groups is rising. 76.71% of employers post jobs in relevant groups while 65.41% of post jobs on their
career page. Organiza ons that have used forms have found them to be effec ve. Budget limita on is restric ng
organiza ons from using social forms in their post and applica ons.
80 80
60 60
18.06%
Budget a Constraint:
25.16%
Organiza ons are exer ng themselves for
social hiring budget. Even the ones that
have not demarcated any budget for social
23.87% hiring priori ze it for finding passive
candidates and for employer branding.
New and mid-level organiza ons that have
lately taken it up seem to be struggling to
meet budget demands and only 23.87% of
organiza ons feel that social hiring cost is a
27.10% concern. These organiza ons have limited
Yes, but not much.
Yes, we have a sufficient budget. No, we don’t have a budget but definitely need one. their budget to target poten al candidate
We may have a budget by the next quarter. No, we don’t need a budget. and to reduce hiring cost.
80 80
60 60
34.62%
40 18.60% 38.27% 40 29.07%
26.92%
17.81% 21.92% 20.99%
20 20
0 0
Though organiza ons concur social
Yes, we have a sufficient budget Yes, but not much hiring is a cost-effec ve op on for
hiring and brand building, they are
yet to calibrate a suitable budget for
1-50 50-500 500-2000 2000+ 1-50 50-500 500-2000 2000+ it. 26.03% of respondents from small
100 100
organiza ons said that they don’t
80 80 have a budget for social hiring but
60 60 they need one. Convincing the board
40 40
would be another challenge that HR
26.03%
22.09%
27.40% 26.74%
21.15%
professionals have to take. A cost-
13.46% 20.99%
20
12.35% 20
benefit model could help.
0 0
Somewhat Effec ve
Somewhat Effec ve
Somewhat Effec ve
Somewhat Effec ve
Least Effec ve
Least Effec ve
Least Effec ve
Least Effec ve
Least Effec ve
Most Effec ve
Most Effec ve
Most Effec ve
Most Effec ve
Most Effec ve
100
Social Hiring Has Heavily Impacted Other
90 Hiring Methods:
80
52.94%
51.05%
50.00%
70
42.21%
46.67%
41.32%
44.91%
37.15%
60
33.45%
50 career pages and job portals. Five
25.52%
21.53%
23.08%
16.55%
40
10.18%
20
10
respondents find social media most
0 effec ve for hiring. Conven onally the
Outsourcing most preferred medium of hiring, cold
Job Portals to a Social Media Company
(Monster, recruitment (LinkedIn, Cold Calling website’s calling has declined in popularity and only
Indeed etc.) agency Facebook etc.) career sec on 22% find it effec ve.
80 80
Social hiring budget is an impediment
13.70% 22.09% 26.92% 23.46% 35.62% 27.91% 17.31% 7.41% and 52.26 % of respondents feel that
60 60
cost is not a limi ng factor.
40 40
Mails and 54.11% of organiza ons ask candidates to mail their CVs and 53.08% of respondents direct candidates
career page: to their career pages.
ATS: Respondents find linking ATS with social pla orms effec ve but cumbersome since it is to be done
manually.
17.81% of organiza ons that are using chatbots on the career page of their websites have found them
effec ve. Respondents have said that chatbots are encouraging engagement among applicants.
Chatbots Closed-ended chat op ons ease the applica on process. However, its applica on will depend on
bring
Engagement: coopera on between the HR and the tech team. Support from stakeholders will be required. Integra on
of chatbots however, seems inevitable considering the popularity of AI, Machine Learning and NLP.
The integra on needs to be pondered upon.
Organiza ons that have used social forms found them easy and effec ve. But only a small percentage
Forms: of 13.02% of organiza ons, notably big organiza ons, are using them. Given the ease and effec veness
of social forms, these can be be er used.
Group 76.71% of respondents rated pos ng jobs for specific roles in the relevant group as the most important
pos ngs: social hiring prac ce.
The TopCHRO survey Social Hiring 2019 establishes social hiring as a prominent and popular hiring and brand building mechanism. It has
replaced, if not completely wiped out, tradi onal hiring, brand building and employee engagement methods and its benefits are
uncontestable.
Recent demands of disrup ve workforces and diversity challenge the HR managers to up their recruitment and employee engagement game.
The current and upcoming tech-savvy millennial and Gen-Z workforce is more or less oblivious to the tradi onal hiring mechanisms. They
cannot be used anymore either to a ract or to retain talent. Applicant preferences reinforce the use of social hiring.
With social hiring, both reach and impact can be exponen al. Its applicability is enormous and it seems we haven’t explored the complete
possibili es in social hiring and have restricted ourselves to few tried and tested uses.
To get maximum advantage, organiza ons must build and apply strategies that align social hiring with their goals. It is recommended that the
organiza ons use social hiring for iden fying the desired candidate, employer branding and talent acquisi on if they are medium or small in
size and, for brand building too if they are big. Integra ng interfaces like chatbots, ATS and forms are likely to increase the effec veness of
the social hiring process.
Bigger organiza ons are inves ng more on social hiring while medium and smaller organiza ons are trying to invest more in it. Its prevalence
and preference indicate that social hiring will con nue to be a preferred or probably the only hiring and engagement source for a long me
to come. Deligh ully so.
Our sincere thanks to all respondents who took out their valuable me and made efforts to respond to this survey. If you have an opinion or
a sugges on for us, please feel free to respond to us. We greatly appreciate your interest in the TopCHRO ini a ve.
Thank you!
TopCHRO is commi ed to the growth and development of HR and Talent Management profession and leadership. Periodically, it iden fies
the world’s 100 best-performing CHROs and senior HR professionals, and shares lessons from their success and vivid experiences, which have
impacted and influenced business and the profession of HR in significant ways. TopCHRO aims to be a comprehensive, one-stop resource
for the global HR community on new trends, perspec ves, discussions, developments, research and emerging best prac ces in human
resource and talent management.
TopCHRO™ does not guarantee applica on or validity of informa on and insights in this report and will not be responsible for any loss that may arise from use of the informa on or insight cited in the report. Readers
are advised to use their own judgment while making related decisions.