Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
E = 20GPA
ν = 0.2
2 Draw B.M diagram/ SF Diagram and Axial force diagrem using FEM
Answer
* Convert distribution load to equalent nodel Load
End Reaction = WL/2 = 50X3 / 2 End Moment = 50X3^2 / 12
= 75 KN = 37.5 KNm
I beam = 300x450^3/12 I Column = 300x300^3/12
= 2.28E-03 m 4
= 6.75E-04 m4
Each element behave as a bar element with 6 DOF. So it can be consider following stifness matrix
In Local Coordinate System
900 0 0 -900 0 0 u1
-900 0 0 900 0 0 u2
600 0 0 -600 0 0 ui
0 6 9 0 -6 9 vi
K2= 1E+03 0 9 18 0 -9 9 θi
-600 0 0 600 0 0 uj
0 -6 -9 0 6 -9 vj
0 9 9 0 -9 18 θj
K =
x10^3
Member 2
u3 v3 θ3 u1 v1 θ1
6 0 -9 -6 0 -9 u3
0 600 0 0 -600 0 v3
K = 1E+03 -9 0 18 9 0 9 θ3
-6 0 9 6 0 9 u1
0 -600 0 0 600 0 v1
-9 0 9 9 0 18 θ1
Member 3
u4 v4 θ4 u2 v2 θ2
6 0 -9 -6 0 -9 u4
0 600 0 0 -600 0 v4
K = 1000 -9 0 18 9 0 9 θ4
-6 0 9 6 0 9 u2
0 -600 0 0 600 0 v2
-9 0 9 9 0 18 θ2
Assembling global stifness matix
u1 v1 θ1 u2 v2 θ2 u3 v3 θ3 u4 v4 θ4
906 0 9 -900 0 0 -6 0 9 0 0 0 u1
0 620.3 30.38 0 -20.25 30.38 0 -600 0 0 0 0 v1
9 30.38 78.75 0 -30.38 30.38 -9 0 9 0 0 0 θ1
-900 0 0 906 0 9 0 0 0 -6 0 9 u2
K = 1000 0 -20.25 -30.38 0 620.3 -30.38 0 0 0 0 -600 0 v2
0 30.38 30.38 9 -30.38 78.75 0 0 0 -9 0 9 θ2
-6 0 -9 0 0 0 6 0 -9 0 0 0 u3
0 -600 0 0 0 0 0 600 0 0 0 0 v3
9 0 9 0 0 0 -9 0 18 0 0 0 θ3
0 0 0 -6 0 -9 0 0 0 6 0 -9 u4
0 0 0 0 -600 0 0 0 0 0 600 0 v4
0 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 -9 0 18 θ4
R5= 30.63 R6+R2 AND R6= 20.4 R6-R2 R4= 1.01 R4+R1, R3= 101 R3-R1
906 0 9 -900 0 0 0.0
0 620.3 30.38 0 -20.25 30.38 -75.0
0 3058 7919 900 -3058 3058 -3775
0 0 9 12.04 0 9.06 0
0 0 -900 0 18978 -900 -2372
0 0 589.9 183.8 -600 1578 840.7
R6 = 1.526 R6+R5
906 0 9 -900 0 0 0
0 620.3 30.38 0 -20.25 30.38 -75
0 3058 7919 900 -3058 3058 -3775
0 0 9 12.04 0 9.06 0
0 0 -900 0 18978 -900 -2372
0 0 0 280.4 18062 1507 -1089
R5 = 788 R5-R4
906 0 9 -900 0 0 0
0 620.3 30.38 0 -20.25 30.38 -75
0 0 -7769 -900 2958 -2908 3405
0 0 0 9493 2958 4913 3405
0 0 0 0 1E+05 -4865 -22109
0 0 0 0 -13643 -1506 537
R6 = 10.75 R6+R5
906 0 9 -900 0 0 0
0 620.3 30.38 0 -20.25 30.38 -75
0 0 -7769 -900 2958 -2908 3405
0 0 0 9493 2958 4913 3405.26
0 0 0 0 146671 -4865 -22109
0 0 0 0 0 -21053 -16336
So
0.0 906 0 9 -900 0 0 U1
-75.0 0 620.3 30.4 0.0 -20.3 30.4 V1
3405.3 = 1000 0 0 -7769 -900 2958 -2908 x θ1
3405.3 0 0 0 9493 2958 4913 U2
-22108.9 0 0 0 0 146671 -4865 V2
-16335.6 0 0 0 0 0 -21053 θ2
By solving Equations
U1 = 3.87E-06 m
V1 = -1.25E-04 m
θ1 = -7.76E-04 Rad
U2 = -3.87E-06 m
V2 = -1.25E-04 m
θ2 = 7.76E-04 Rad
f1x = 6.96 KN
f1y = 75.00 KN
m1 = 13.93 KNm
f2x = -6.96 KN
f2y = 75.00 KN
m2 = -13.93 KNm
f4x = 75 KN
f4y = 6.96 KN
m4 = 6.948 KNm
f2x = -75 KN
f2y = -6.96 KN
m2 = 13.9 KNm
Comparisionof SAP 2000 Out Put
Rotational and translation at pont B and C
From Manual Calculation From Sap 2000 output
U1 = 3.87E-06 m U1 = 3.79E-06
V1 = -1.25E-04 m V1 = -1.25E-04
θ1 = -7.76E-04 Rad θ1 = -7.82E-04
U2 = -3.87E-06 m U2 = -3.79E-06
V2 = -1.25E-04 m V2 = -1.25E-04
θ2 = 7.76E-04 Rad θ2 = 7.82E-04
According to the FEM and Sap 2000 Results there have slight change in the results which shall be
neglectable. This shall be cause on followings.
* In manual calculations carried all calculations in round off values. From there shall bring
cumulative variation with such minor value.
*
In manual calculations considered only the purely provided values of the E and I which shall
applicable for the bending stiffener. However for the SAP model it is considering all 3
Dimentional configuration with material Properties such that bending and shear stifner. So
there shall bring minor change.
According to the SAP Model out put, it observed Shear force diagram shown in other direction
than usual sign convention. It because of the sap 2000 is considering postive direction of shear
force is in downward direction as extracted in following figure. So shear force diagram appeared in
mirored direction
Rotational and translation at the node B and C