Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 8. Reviewed with June 2018- Quality Consistently Frequently led Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable Frequently led 4 3 3.50
Services Planning colleagues, teacher March 2019 participated in collaborative collaborative collaborative evidence was collaborative reviews
and learner feedback LACs/FGDs/meetin reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher shown of teacher and
to plan, facilitate and gs to discuss and learner and learner and learner learner feedback as
enrich teaching teacher/learner feedback as feedback as feedback as evidenced by the
practice. feedback to enrich evidenced by the evidenced by the evidenced by the MOV submitted
instruction as MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
shown in the MOV
submitted
Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Advised and June 2018- Quality Consistently Frequently advised Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable Frequently advised 4 4 4.00
Services guided colleagues in March 2019 advised colleagues colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the evidence was colleagues in the
the selection, in the selection, selection, in the selection, selection, shown selection,
organization, organization, organization, organization, organization, organization,
development and use development and development and development and development and development and
of appropriate appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of
teaching and learning teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
resources, including learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resources
ICT, to address as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
specific learning 7.5% MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
goals.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 3 teaching
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was and learning
learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resource shown resources as
as evidenced by at as evidenced by at as evidenced by at as evidenced by evidenced by at least
least 1 of the least 1 of the least 1 of the any of the 1 of the acceptable
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV
Timeliness
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM ( IPCRF) FOR MASTER TEACHER I-VI
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Worked June 2018- Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable Frequently reviewed 4 4 4.00
Services and Reporting collaboratively with March 2019 reviewed reviewed reviewed collaboratively evidence was collaboratively
colleagues to review collaboratively collaboratively collaboratively assessment tools shown assessment tools
the design, selection, assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools with colleagues as with colleagues as
organization and use with colleagues as with colleagues as with colleagues as shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
of a range of effective shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted submitted
diagnostic, formative 7.5% submitted submitted submitted
and summative
assessment Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 3
strategies consistent assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was assessment tools as
with curriculum as evidently shown as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown evidently shown in
requirements. in any of the in any of the in any of the any of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
ND REVIEW FORM ( IPCRF) FOR MASTER TEACHER I-VI
Score
0.262
0.300
ND REVIEW FORM ( IPCRF) FOR MASTER TEACHER I-VI
0.300
COMPETENCIES
4 Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency. May focus on new
4 4 Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit and
organization. 4
or more precise ways of meeting goals set. 5 Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilties. Demonstrates resourcefulness and the ability
to succeed with minimal resources.
5 Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve performance. Examples
may include doing something better, faster, at alower cost, more efficiently; or improving quality,
costumer satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal.
5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates; 1 - Rarely demonstrate
OVERALL
COMPETENCY 4.00
RATINGS
The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed to the contents of the performance as captured in this form.
Performed various related Exhibited effective and constructive behavior management 1. Do an action research for the development of students
Learning and Development Team Supervisor/ School Head
works/activities that contribute to the skills by applying positive and non-violent discipline to and school. June 2018 - March 2019
teaching-learning process. DepEd Funds Local Funds
ensure learning-focused environments. 2. Attend seminars about action research.
Weight
Weight Numerical Ratings
per
KRA per Objectives Score
Objecti Q E T Ave
KRA
Objective 1 ve
7.5% 4 4 4.00 0.300
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 1 1 0 1.000 0.080
Objective 3 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 4 7.5% 4 5 4.500 0.337
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 4 3 3.500 0.262
Objective 6 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 7 7.5% 4 3 3.500 0.262
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 4 3 3.500 0.262
Objective 9 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 10 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 4 5 4.500 0.337
Objective 12 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Plus Facto 10% Objective 13 10% 5 5 5.000 0.500
Final Rating 3.835
Adjectival Rating VS
Department of Education
JOB SUMMARY
QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications
Education Bachelor of Science in Business Administration Major in University of San Carlos
Management
Experience Teacher I - ( 3 Years ) Master Teacher - 1 ( 3 Years ) 6 years
Licensure Examination for Teachers (LET);
Eligibility RA 1080 November 25, 2011
NEAP
SHS GRADE 11 MASS TRAINING WORKSHOP ON
COMMON/ GEN TOPICS.
Emillio Aguinaldo College
Trainings SHS GRADE 11 MASS TRAINING OF TEACHERS IN THE
K-12 PROGRAM.
B. Preferred Qualifications
Education BSBA with Doctoral Degree in Educational Management ( Complete Academic Requirements )
Experience 6 Years
None
Eligibility LET PASSER
//SGOD-gpm©2018 Page 1 of 1
aster Teacher I
G-18
ne 16, 2016
- 19
16-Jun-16
os
equirements )
vement.
for the improvement of
educative process.
owth and advancement.
servation/ organizing/
Page 1 of 1