Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
LC-8
Seismic Velocity
Learning objectives:
To know
1) Definition of different seismic velocities
2) Why Vrms ~ Vstack
3) Dix's equation
4) How to generate the VAVE for
depth conversion
Seismic Velocities
Important for :
Conversion from traveltime to depth(Time depth
conversion)
Check of results by modeling
NMO correction--->Stacking
Imaging of the data (migration)
Classification and Filtering of Signal and Noise
Predictions of the Lithology
Aid for geological Interpretation
Seismic Velocities
1. T-D relationship
Chart
Table
2. Time
TWT-Two Way
OWT-One Way
3. Depth
Meters
Feet
Major reson:
Compaction
Factors affecting velocity estimates
Vstack~Vrms
Characteristics of seismic velocity
d3 2.5 H
1. Interval Velocity
2. Average Velocity
3. Stacking Velocity
4. RMS(Root Mean Square) Velocity
5. Instantaneous Velocity
1. Interval Velocity
t1 Travel
Velocity Depth
Z1 Time
t2
Z2 t1 Vave-1 Z1
t3 t2 Vave-2 Z2
Z3
t3 Vave-3 Z3
t4
Z4
t4 Vave-4 Z4
3. Stacking Velocity
Also called as " NMO velocity"
It is a velocity that gives best stack of the seismic signals, usually drive
from the following equation:
offset
offset
Vstack-1
Vstack-2
Vstack-3
Vstack-4
Stacking Velocity(Multiple layers)
offset
Vrms
offset
Characteristics of seismic velocity
V2-stacking
V3
Best Stacking
CMP data
T3 V3-stacking
V4
T4 V4-stacking Vstack~Vrms
V5
T5 V5-stacking
Characteristics of seismic velocity
T0
V1
T1 V1-stacking
V2
T2
TWT(s)
V2-stacking
V3
T3 V3-stacking
V4
T4 V4-stacking
V5
T5 V5-stacking
Characteristics of seismic velocity
Stacking Velocity as function of time
Vstack-1
Vstack ~ VRMS
Vstack-2
Vstack-3
Vstack-4
504
504
6104 839
5839
6038
6261
1682
6865
4. RMS Velocity
If subsurface made of horizontal layers with interval velocities v1,v2,v3,...and one
way time t1, t2, t3,..., VRMS gives by the following formula:
Note:
1- RMS velocity is usually higher than average velocity by approximately 5%.
2- RMS velocity map gives a first indication of velocity variations.
3- The root-mean-square (RMS) velocity is a weighted average.
4- RMS velocity is not a measured velocity.
5. Instantaneous Velocity
3. Vinst=V0+KZ
average velocity, The formula for the V-aveis as follows.
Average Velocity = ∆ S/∆ T
Instantaneous Velocity
In mathematical terms, it can be defined in the following way.
It is the velocity of the object, calculated in the shortest instant of time possible (calculated
as the time interval ∆ T tends to zero).
In terms of the graph, instantaneous velocity at a moment, is the slope of the tangent line drawn at a point on
the curve, corresponding to that particular instant.
Instantaneous velocity, v, is simply the average velocity at a specific instant in time or over an infinitesimally
small time interval.
Methods of velocity-analysis
1. x2-t2 - analysis
2. Methods using NMO correction:
CVP - constant velocity panels
CVS - constant velocity stacks
velocity spectral analysis (semblance analysis)
x -t - analysis
2 2
x2
t 2 = t02 + 2
vstack
1. NMO correction--->Stacking
Reflection hyperbola horizontal alignment Seismic trace
NMO Stacking
correction
Velocity Analysis:
Original CMP gather
Constant-velocity NMO
Velocity panels
Velocity panels:real data example
Derivation of
Dix's equation/formular
Dix's Formular/Equation
Conversion from Vrms to Vvint (interval velocities)
Key Concept of Dix' equation
Interval velocity derived from RMS velocity
Dix formula:
derives the interval velocity from root-mean-square
(NMO/stacking) velocities.
504
504
6104 839
5839
6038
6261
1682
6865
TWT
504
504
6104 839
5839
6038
6261
1682
6865
Velocity(ft/s) Depth (ft)
5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500 8000 -1000 0 Depth
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
0.0 0.0
0.5 0.5
TWT (sec)
TWT (sec)
1.0 1.0
1.5 1.5
Vint
2.0 Vrms 2.0
Vave
2.5 2.5
Time-Depth chart
Stacking
or RMS Average
Model Interval
Thickness TWT velocity velocity
velocity
Tave=Trms
But Trms with longer travel path,
Vrms > Vave
Summay of Stacking Velocity
They are fairly reliable in the shallow part of the section, unreliable in
the deeper parts.
These velocities can change erratically from one velocity layer to the
next.
The true velocities are not that variable, but the uncertainty of picking
stacking velocities makes them vary widely.
Δz(i)
VInt(i) =
Δt(i)
Δz
VInt( 1 ) =
(Travel Time)
VInt( 1 ) ⋅ t0
Δz( 1 ) =
2
Zero-offset geometry.
The thick blue ray illustrates the incident wave.
The reflection coefficient determines the strength of the reflected and transmitted wave fields.
Example: Constant-Velocity Depth Conversion
If we take the case of an interval velocity of 3,000 m/s and
a roundtrip travel time(twt) of 2.0 seconds then
Depth = Δz
3,000 m/ sec ⋅ 2 sec
= = 3,000 m.
2
Vint=3000 m/s
TWT=2 s Interval velocity
Constant velocity
Homogeneous
layer
Multiple layers
A zero-offset experiment in a more realistic, depth-dependent velocity model
Depth
( 2 B) 2 = ( 2 A) 2 + x Offset
2
,
2
( 2 B)2 ( 2 A)2 xOffset
= + 2
VInt2 VInt2 VInt
2
2 2
xOffset
t xOffset =t +
0
VInt2
2
2
xOffset
t xOffset = t + 0
VInt2
2
xOffset
VInt =
NB: This equation is accurate only under t x2Offset − t02
constant velocity and assumed straight rays
Observed zero and non-zero offset travel times.
Example: Observed water-bottom two-way travel times
2
xOffset
VInt( 1 ) = 2
t x2Offset − t0
2650 2
=
2.072 2 − 2.0082
= 5,185 ft./ sec .
2
Both zero- and finite-offset rays VInt xOffset
reflect at the same subsurface = 2
cos (θ ) t xOffset − t02
locations