Rpms Ipcrf Mti IV Final 6

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPC
Name of Employee: MARIO R. CORTEZ

Positon: MASTER TEACHER I
Review: June 2018 - March 2019
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DepEd/Division of Marikina City
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
QUALITY, EFFECIENCY, TIMELINESS
Weight per MEANS OF VERIFICATION
MFO's KEY RESULT AREAS Objectives Timeline KRA OUTSTANDING VERY SATISFACTORY
(MOV)
(5) (4)
1. Modeled effectve 1. Classroom observaton tool (COT) Quality
applicatons of content ratng sheet and/or inter-observer
Modeled effectve Modeled effectve
knowledge within and agreement form about effectve applicatons of applicatons of
across curriculum applicatons of content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge
within and across within and across
teaching areas. within the across curriculum curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
teaching areas areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a ratng MOV 1 with a ratng
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in of 8 of 7
demonstraton teaching highlightng
integraton of content knowledge
within and across subject areas Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons
lessons as as evidenced by
3. Instructonal materials developed evidenced by MOV 1 MOV 1 from
7.5% highlightng effectve applicaton and supported by colleagues and
any 1 of the other supported by any 1
of content knowledge within and MOV given of the other MOV
across subject areas given
4. Performance tasks/test material(s)
integraton of content knowledge
within and across subject areas
5. Results of assessment used in
mastery of lessons learned
ducaton Services
6. Others (Please specify and provide

CONTENT annotatons) Timeliness
KNOWLEDGE AND 2. Collaborated with 1. Copy of the research proposal focused Quality Conducted, Conducted and
completed and completed acton
PEDAGOGY colleagues in the on enriching knowledge of content and disseminated acton research with
research with colleagues
Basic Educaton Services

MFO's KEY RESULT
CONTENTAREAS Objectives Timeline KRA OUTSTANDING VERY SATISFACTORY
KNOWLEDGE AND (MOV) Conducted, Conducted and
completed(5)and completed(4)acton
PEDAGOGY disseminated acton research with
conduct and applicaton pedagogy research with colleagues
(22.5%) colleagues
of research to enrich 2. Proof of partcipaton and/or
knowledge of content contributon to a collaboratve research
and pedagogy. (e.g. e-mail, actual output submitted, Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 of
of the given MOV the acceptable MOV
terms of reference, etc.)
7.5% 3. Certfied completed collaboratve
research focused on enriching Timeliness Presented the Completed the
research report research report
knowledge cotent and pedagogy within the ratng within the ratng
4. Proof of disseminaton of research period period
findings with colleagues
5. Proof of utlizaton of research findings
annotatons)
3. Developed and applied 1. Classroom observaton tool (COT) Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated
effectve teaching effectve teaching
effectve teaching ratng sheet and/or inter-observer strategies to strategies to
strategies to promote agreement form about using effectve promote critcal and promote critcal and
creat e thinking, as creat e thinking, as
critcal and creatve teaching strategies to promote critcal well as other higher- well as other higher-
thinking, as well as other and creatve teaching, as well as other order thinking skills order thinking skills
7.5% as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
higher-order thingking higher-order thingking skills with a ratng of 8 with a ratng of 7
skills. 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in
different teaching strategies that
develop critcal and creatve thinking

(MOV)
(5) (4)
and/or other HOTS Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 lessons
more lessons as as evidently shown
3. Instructonal materials highlightng evidently shown in in MOV 1 and
different teaching strategies that MOV 1 and supported by any 1
supported by any 1 of the other MOV
develop critcal and creatve thinking, of the other MOV given
and/or other HOTS given
4. Performance tasks/test material(s) in
demonstraton teaching
5. Results assessment used in the
demonstraton teaching
annotatons) Timeliness
4. Worked with colleagues 1. Classroom observaton tool (COT) Quality Modeled and Modeled and
shared effectve shared effectve
to model and share ratng sheet and/or inter-observer classroom classroom
effectve techniques in agreement form about sharing effectve management management
strategies that strategies that
the management of techniques in the management of engage learners in engage learners in
classroom structure to classroom structure actvites/tasks done actvites/tasks done
in different physical in different physical
engege learners, 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in learning learning
individually or in demonstraton teaching highlightng environments as environments as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
groups, in meaningful effectve classroom management with a ratng of 8 with a ratng of 7
exploraton, discovery strategies that engage learners in
and hands-on actvites 7.5% actvites/tasks in different physical
within a range of learning environments
physical learning 3. Minutes of LAC highlightng the sharing Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons
lessons supported supported by MOV
environments. on effectve classroom management by MOV 1 and any 1 1 and any 1 of the
techniques of the other other acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV
4. Instructonal materials used in
demontraton teaching
5. Exhibited effectve and 1. Providing motvaton Quality Exhibited effectve Exhibited effectve
on Services
and constructve and constructve

constructve behvior 2. Praising the learners/Giving positve behavior behavior
management skills by feedback management skills management skills
LEARNING by applying positve by applying positve
and non-violent and non-violent
Weight per MEANS OF VERIFICATION Exhibited effectve Exhibited effectve
MFO's KEY RESULT AREAS Objectives Timeline
KRA OUTSTANDING
and constructve VERYconstructve
and SATISFACTORY
(MOV) behavior behavior
management(5) skills management(4) skills
LEARNING by applying positve by applying positve
applying positve and 3. Setting house rules/guidelines
ENVIRONMENT and non-violent and non-violent
non-violent discipline to 4. Ensuring learners' actve partcipaton discipline to ensure discipline to ensure
learning-focused learning-focused
(22.5%) ensure learning-focused 5. Allowing learners to express their environments environments
environments. ideas/opinions shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a ratng of 8 with a ratng of 7
6. Giving equal opportunites to learners
7.5% 7. Encouraging learners to ask questons
annotatons)
Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of

the given strategies the given strategies
as observed in at as observed in at
least 4 lessons least 3 lessons
Timeliness
6. Worked with colleagues 1. Minutes of LAC session/s, highlightng Quality Worked with Worked with
colleagues at least colleagues in the
to share differentated, one's sharing of strategies on in the school level to share
developmentally differentated and developmentally district/cluster level lesson
to share lesson
appropriate appropriate opportunites to address
opportunites to address learners' differences
7.5%
learners' differences in 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlightng
gender, needs, strengths, stategies on differentated and
interests and developmentally-appropriate
experiences. opportunites to address
learners' differences
(MOV)
(5) (4)
3. Corresponding instructonal materials Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3
lessons as evidently lessons as evidently
showing differentated and shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
developmentally-appropriate and supported by and supported by
any acceptable MOV any acceptable MOV
opportunites to address
learners' differences
4. Others (e.g. testmonial, write-up from
colleagues of the lessons/insights
gained from the Master Teacher's
sharing) Timeliness
7. Developed and applied 1. Classroom observaton tool (COT) Quality Develped and Develped and
effectve strategies in the applied effectve applied effectve
ratng sheet and/or inter-observer strategies showing strategies showing
planning and agreement form about using effectve developmentally- developmentally-
management of sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
strategies in implementng and learning process and learning process
developmentally developmentally sequenced teaching as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
sequenced teaching and with a ratng of 8 with a ratng of 7
and learning process
learning processes to 2. Results of learners' assessment during
meet curriculum the actual teaching
requirements and varied 3. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in
7.5%
teaching contexts. demonstraton teaching highlightng
developmentally sequenced Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least
lessons as 2-3 lessons as
teaching-learning process evidenced by MOV 1 evidenced by MOV 1
4. Instructonal materials showing and 2 and and 2 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1
effectve strategies in developmentally of the other of the other
sequenced teaching and learning acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
process
8. Reviewed with 1. Implemented LAC/FGD Plan Quality Consistently led Frequently led
collaboratve collaboratve
colleagues, teacher and 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on use of
ducaton Services
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher

learner feedback to plan, teacher and learner feedback to enrich and learner and learner
facilitate and enrich feedback as feedback as
teaching practce with proof of evidenced by the evidenced by the
CURRICULUM AND
teaching process. attendance MOV submitted MOV submitted
PLANNING
(22.5%)

MFO's CURRICULUM
KEY RESULT AREAS Objectives Timeline
AND KRA OUTSTANDING VERY SATISFACTORY
PLANNING (MOV)
(5) (4)
(22.5%) annotatons) Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3
collaboratve collaboratve
7.5% reviews of teacher reviews of teacher
and learner and learner
feedback as feedback as
evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV
Timeliness
9. Advised and guided 1. Teaching and learning resources Quality Consistently advised Frequently advised
colleagues in the colleagues in the
colleagues in the developed by colleagues and critqued selecton, selecton,
selecton, organizaton, on their alignment to learning goals organizat6ion, organizat6ion,
development and use of development and development and
2. Lesson plans by colleagues critqued in appropriate use of appropriate use of
appropriate teaching and terms of the alignment of the teaching teaching and teaching and
learning resources, learning resources learning resources
and learning resources to the indicated as shown in the as shown in the
including ICT, to address 7.5% MOV submitted MOV submitted
learning goals and appropriateness to
specific learning goals. the target learners
annotatons)
(MOV)
(5) (4)
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3
teaching and teaching and
learning resources learning resources
as evidenced by at as evidenced by at
least 1 of the least 1 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
10. Worked collaboratvely 1. Any proof of collaboratve review if the Quality Consistently Frequently reviewed
reviewed collaboratvely
with colleagues to test is designed based on its purpose collaboratvely assessment tools
review the design, (e.g. diagnostc, formatve and assessment tools with colleagues as
with colleagues as shown in the MOV
selecton, organizaton summatve) shown in the MOV submitted
and use of a range of 2. Any proof of collaboratve review of the submitted
effectve diagnostc, alignment of the test with the curriculum
formatve and summatve 7.5% 2.1. formatve test attached to a Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3
assessment tools as assessment tools as
assessments.strategies lesson plan evidently shown in evidently shown in
consistent with 2.2. summatve assessment with TOS any of the any of the
curriculum requirements. 2.3. diagnostc test with its TOS
11. Interpreted 1. Collaboratve interpretaton of the Quality Consistently Frequently
collaborated with collaborated with
collaboratvely index of mastery obtained from 1 class colleagues in the colleagues in the
monitoring and 2. Collaboratve interpretaton of item interpretaton of interpretaton of
assessment data as assessment data as
evaluaton strategies of analysis of quarterly examinatons shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
attainment data to 3. Collaboratve interpretaton of reslts submitted submitted
support learner progress 7.5%
of performance assessment
and achievement. 4. Others (Please specify and provide Efficiency Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 3
different types of of the same kind of
annotatons) MOV MOV
on Services
Timeliness
ASSESSMENT AND
MFO's KEY RESULT AREAS Objectives Timeline KRA
OUTSTANDING VERY SATISFACTORY

(MOV)
(5) (4)
ASSESSMENT AND 12. Applied skills in the 1. Sample agreement for lerners at risk Quality Consistently applied Frequently applied
REPORTING skills in the effectve skills in the effectve
effectve communicaton signed by parents and corresponding communicaton of communicaton of
(22.5%) of learner needs, evidence of improvement learner needs and learner needs and
progress to progress to
progress and 2. Record of dialogue and/or parent- parents/guardians parents/guardians
achievement to key teacher conferences and corresponding as shown in he MOV as shown in he MOV
submitted submitted
stakeholders, including evidence of improvement
parets/guardians. 3. Anecdotal record communicated to
and signed by the learners and/or
parents with corresponding
evidence of improvement
4. Sample of learners' test results signed
by parents and corresponding
evidence of improvement
5. Sample of accomplished rubrics given
7.5%
for performance task and
corresponding evidence of improvement
6. Attendace sheet/minutes of parent- Efficiency Submitted at least 3 Submitted any 3
of the acceptable MOV
teacher conference MOV
7. Signed report cards of students at risk
with corresponding evidence of
improvement
8. Correspondence notebook/letters/proof
of communicaton using other
modalites (e.g. e-mail, SMS, etc.) and
corresponding evidence of improvement
9. Learners' performance record
(MOV)
(5) (4)
13. Performed various 1. Served as reliever of classes in the Quality Consistently Frequently
performed special performed special
related work/actvites absence of tdeachers tasks and/or tasks and/or
that contribute to the 2. Served as OIC in the absence of the assignments as assignments as
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
teaching-learning principal submitted submitted
process. 3. Represented the principal in meetngs
and conferences
4. Observed classes of Teachers I-III
5. Assisted the school selecton committee
in the evalu teachersaton of credentals
when hiring or promotng

6. Certficate of Partcipaton
PLUS FACTOR 7. Certficate of Training Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted only 3
10.0% different kinds of different kinds of
(10%) 8. Certfcate of Speakership acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
9. Committee involvement
10. Advisorship of co-curricular actvites
11. Book or Journal authorship/
Contributorship
12. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship
13. Coaching and mentoring learners in
compettons
14. Mentoring pre-service/interventon
15. Other
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satsfactory
2.500-3.499 Satsfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatsfactory
Below 1.499 Poor
(MOV)
(5) (4)
Overall rating/assessment for the accomplishments

shall fall withinthe following adjectival ratings and
shall be in three(3) decimal points.
MARIO R. CORTEZ EDNA S. CONSTANTINO

Ratee Rater
OMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
Name of Rater: EDNA S. CONSTANTINO
Positon: PRINCIPAL
Date of Review: April 2019
ING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

QUALITY, EFFECIENCY, TIMELINESS RATING
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR ACTUAL SCORE
RESULTS Q E T Ave
(3) (2) (1)
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Modeled effectve Modeled effectve
applicatons of applicatons of
content knowledge content knowledge
within and across within and across
curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a ratng MOV 1 with a ratng
of 6 of 5
Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable

as evidenced by as evidenced by evidence was
MOV 1 from MOV 1 from shown 4 4 4 0.3000
colleagues and colleagues and
of the other MOV of the other MOV
given given
Conducted acton Proposed acton No acceptable

research with research with evidence was
colleagues colleagues shown
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR ACTUAL
Conducted acton Proposed acton No acceptable
SCORE
RESULTS Q E T Ave
research with
(3) research with
(2) evidence was(1)
colleagues colleagues shown
Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable

MOV MOV evidence was
shown
4 4 4 4 0.3000
Conducted the Prroposed the No acceptable
research report research report evidence was
within the ratng within the ratng shown
period period
Demonstrated Demonstrated
effectve teaching effectve teaching
strategies to strategies to
promote critcal and promote critcal and
creat e thinking, as creat e thinking, as
well as other higher- well as other higher-
order thinking skills order thinking skills
as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
with a ratng of 6 with a ratng of 5 4 4 4 0.3000
RESULTS Q E T Ave
(3) (2) (1)
Submitted 2 lessons Submitted lesson as No acceptable
as evidently shown evidently shown in evidence was
in MOV 1 and MOV 1 and shown
of the other MOV of the other MOV
given given
Modeled and Modeled and

shared effectve shared effectve
classroom classroom
management management
strategies that strategies that
engage learners in engage learners in
actvites/tasks done actvites/tasks done
in different physical in different physical
learning learning
environments as environments as
4 4 4 0.3000
Submitted 2 lessons Submitted any 1 No acceptable

supported by MOV lesson of the evidence was
1 and any 1 of the acceptable MOV shown
other acceptable
MOV
Exhibited effectve Exhibited effectve No acceptable

and constructve and constructve evidence was
behavior behavior shown
management skills management skills
by applying positve by applying positve
Exhibited effectve Exhibited effectve No acceptable ACTUAL
SATISFACTORY
and constructve UNSATISFACTORY
and constructve POOR was
evidence SCORE
behavior behavior shown RESULTS Q E T Ave
management (3) skills management(2)skills (1)
by applying positve by applying positve
discipline to ensure discipline to ensure
learning-focused learning-focused
environments environments
4 4 4 0.3000
Applied at least 7 of Applied at least any No acceptable

the given strategies of the given evidence was
as observed in at strategies as shown
least 2 lessons observed in only 1
lesson
Worked with Worked with No acceptable

colleagues in the colleagues but no evidence was
department or evidence of sharing shown
grade level to share with others
lesson
4 4 4 0.3000
RESULTS Q E T Ave
(3) (2) (1)
Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable
lessons as evidently lesson as evidenced evidence was
shown in MOV 1 by either by MOV 2 shown
and supported by or 3 but no evidene
any acceptable MOV of sharing with
others
Develped and Develped and No acceptable

applied effectve applied effectve evidence was
strategies showing strategies showing shown
developmentally- developmentally-
sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
and learning process and learning process
as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
4 4 4 0.3000
Submitted 1 lesson Submitted 1 lessons No acceptable

as evidenced by as evidenced by any evidence was
MOV 1 and 2 and 1 of the other shown
supported by any 1 acceptable MOV
of the other
acceptable MOV
Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable

collaboratve collaboratve evidence was
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher shown
and learner and learner
feedback as feedback as
evidenced by the evidenced by the
MOV submitted MOV submitted
RESULTS Q E T Ave
(3) (2) (1)
Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
collaboratve collaboratve review evidence was
reviews of teacher of teacher and shown 3 3 3 0.2250
and learner learner feedback as
feedback as evidently shown in
evidently shown in any of the
MOV 1 and acceptable MOV
supported by any 1
of the acceptable
MOV
Occasionally advised Rarely advised No acceptable

colleagues in the colleagues in the evidence was
selecton, selecton, shown
organizat6ion, organizat6ion,
development and development and
appropriate use of appropriate use of
teaching and teaching and
learning resources learning resources
as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted 4 4 4 0.3000
RESULTS Q E T Ave
(3) (2) (1)
Submitted at least 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
teaching and teaching and evidence was
learning resources learning resource as shown
as evidenced by at evidenced by any of
least 1 of the the acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV
Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable

reviewed collaboratvely evidence was
collaboratvely assessment tools shown
assessment tools with colleagues as
with colleagues as shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV submitted
submitted
Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3000

assessment tools as assessment tools as evidence was
evidently shown in evidently shown in shown
any of the any of the
Occasionally Rarely collaborated No acceptable

collaborated with with colleagues in evidence was
colleagues in the the interpretaton of shown
interpretaton of assessment data as
assessment data as shown in the MOV
submitted
4 4 4 0.3000
Submitted at least 2 Submitted any one No acceptable

of the same kind of of the MOV evidence was
MOV shown
RESULTS Q E T Ave
(3) (2) (1)
Occasionally applied Rarely applied skills No acceptable
skills in the effectve in the effectve evidence was
communicaton of communicaton of shown
learner needs and learner needs and
progress to progress to
parents/guardians parents/guardians
as shown in he MOV as shown in he MOV
submitted submitted
4 4 4 0.3000
Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable

MOV MOV evidence was
shown
RESULTS Q E T Ave
(3) (2) (1)
Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable
performed special special tasks and/or evidence was
tasks and/or assignments as shown
assignments as shown in the MOV
submitted
Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable 5 5 5 0.5000

different kinds of acceptable MOV evidence was
acceptable MOV shown
OVERALL RATING OF
ACCOMPLISHMENTS Very Satisfactory 4.0250
RESULTS Q E T Ave
(3) (2) (1)
EDNA S. CONSTANTINO JOEL T. TORRECAMPO

Rater OIC, Office of the Schools Superintendent
Name: MARIO R. CORTEZ School: SSS VILLAGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Position: Master Teacher I School Year: 2019-2020
SUMMARY SHEET FOR THE COMPUTATION OF PORTFOLIO RATING

Master Teacher II
Numerical
Weight per Score
KRA Weight per KRA Objective Ratings
Objective
Q E T Ave
Objecive 1 7.5% 4 4 - 4 0.300
1 22.5% Objecive 2 7.5% 4 4 4 4 0.300
Objecive 3 7.5% 4 4 - 4 0.300
Objecive 4 7.5% 4 4 - 4 0.300
2 22.5% Objecive 5 7.5% 4 4 - 4 0.300
Objecive 6 7.5% 4 4 - 4 0.300
Objecive 7 7.5% 4 4 - 4 0.300
3 22.5% Objecive 8 7.5% 3 3 - 3 0.225
Objecive 9 7.5% 4 4 - 4 0.300
Objecive 10 7.5% 4 4 - 4 0.300
4 22.5% Objecive 11 7.5% 4 4 - 4 0.300
Objecive 12 7.5% 4 4 - 4 0.300
5 10.0% Objecive 13 10% 5 5 - 5 0.500
Final Ratng 4.025
Adjectval Ratng Very Satisfactory
MARIO R. CORTEZ EDNA S. CONSTANTINO

Ratee Rater
EDNA S. CONSTANTINO
Approving Authority

Rpms Ipcrf Mti IV Final 6

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Rpms Ipcrf Mti IV Final 6

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPC

Name of Employee: MARIO R. CORTEZ

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

6. Others (Please specify and provide

QUALITY, EFFECIENCY, TIMELINESS

develop critcal and creatve thinking

within a range of learning environments

and constructve and constructve

Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of

reviews of teacher reviews of teacher

QUALITY, EFFECIENCY, TIMELINESS

3. Others (Please specify and provide

OUTSTANDING VERY SATISFACTORY

when hiring or promotng

Overall rating/assessment for the accomplishments

MARIO R. CORTEZ EDNA S. CONSTANTINO

ING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable

Conducted acton Proposed acton No acceptable

Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable

Modeled and Modeled and

Submitted 2 lessons Submitted any 1 No acceptable

Exhibited effectve Exhibited effectve No acceptable

Applied at least 7 of Applied at least any No acceptable

Worked with Worked with No acceptable

Develped and Develped and No acceptable

Submitted 1 lesson Submitted 1 lessons No acceptable

Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable

Occasionally advised Rarely advised No acceptable

Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable

Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3000

Occasionally Rarely collaborated No acceptable

Submitted at least 2 Submitted any one No acceptable

Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable

Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable 5 5 5 0.5000

EDNA S. CONSTANTINO JOEL T. TORRECAMPO

SUMMARY SHEET FOR THE COMPUTATION OF PORTFOLIO RATING

MARIO R. CORTEZ EDNA S. CONSTANTINO

Potrebbero piacerti anche