Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
REPORT ON
“TO STUDY THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL”
AT
“SBI LIFE INSURANCE”
SUBMITTED TO
SAVITRIBAI PHULE
PUNE UNIVERSITY
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF
REQUIREMENT OF
MASTEROF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (MBA)
SUBMITTED BY
RICHA PANKAJ MEHTA
Place: ………………….
I also wish to thank the member of staff of company Vaibhav Saxena and
Bhavesh Tidke and the faculty of the college for their constant support and
help in accomplishing the project.
CONTENTS
COMPANY CERTIFICATE
STUDENT’S DECLARATION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
1. Executive Summary 1
3. Company Profile 4
4. Theoretical Background 12
5. Research Methodology 19
7. Findings 41
8. Suggestions / Recommendations 42
9. Conclusions 43
REFERENCES 44
APPENDIX 45
LIST OF GRAPHS
Sr. No Graph No. Title Of Graph Page
No.
1. 6.1 Gender 24
2. 6.2 Age 25
3. 6.3 Occupation 26
4. 6.4 Annual Income 27
5. 6.5 Investment Preferred 28
6. 6.6 % of Income Invested 29
7. 6.7 Type of Mutual Fund 30
8. 6.8 Time Horizon 31
9. 6.9 Regular Investor 32
10. 6.10 Knowledge about Mutual Fund 33
11. 6.11 Reason to invest 34
12. 6.12 Schemes preferred 35
13. 6.13 Medium of Information 36
14. 6.14 Source of purchase 37
15. 6.15 Attractive Feature 38
16. 6.16 Company Preferred 39
LIST OF TABLE
Sr. No Table No. Title Of Table Page No.
1. 5.1 Research Methodology 23
2 6.1 Gender 24
3 6.2 Age 25
4 6.3 Occupation 26
5 6.4 Annual Income 27
6 6.5 Investment Preferred 28
7 6.6 % of Income Invested 29
8 6.7 Type of Mutual Fund 30
9 6.8 Time Horizon 31
10 6.9 Regular Investor 32
11 6.10 Knowledge about 33
Mutual Fund
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Project study report consists of brief description of company SBI LIFE
INSURANCE CO. LTD., NASHIK, the special focus on the human resources.
My topic was “PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AT SBI INSURANCE
COMPANY” along with significant findings & suggestions that give idea how
many the employees in the company are satisfied and not satisfied with welfare
facility of the company.
for promotions, providing financial rewards and other actions which require
different treatment among the members of the group as, distinguished from
better and also assisted in identifying the needs of the employees. This helps to
Reason for selecting SBI LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY is, it is one of the
The project was conducted in Nasik city for a period of 2 months i.e. 15
May to 15 July.
PHASE 2- I communicated with them about the performance appraisal
system
PHASE 3-Questionnaire was prepared and observation was done.
PHASE 4- Questions were asked and Questionnaire was filled by the
employees.
The data was collected and analyzed.
RESULT: The study has helped to know the performance of the employees
better and also assisted in identifying the needs of the employees. This helps to
improve the effectiveness of the performance appraisal that in turn leads to better
Mission
“To emerge as the leading company offering a comprehensive range of life insurance
and pension products at competitive prices, ensuring high standards of customer satisfaction
and world class operating efficiency, and become a model life insurance company in India in
Values
Trustworthiness
Ambition
Innovation
Dynamism
Excellence
Vision
To be the most trusted and preferred life insurance provider.
LOCATION:-NASHIK
PRODUCT RANGE
UNIT LINKED PRODUCTS:
Horizon 11
Unit plus 11
Unit plus child plan
Unit Plan Elite
Smart Ulip
PENSION PRODUCTS:
Horizon 11 Pension
Unit Plus 11 Pensions
Lifelong Pension
Immediate Annuity
DHANARAKSHA PLUS:
Dhanaraksha Plus SP
Dhanaraksha plus LPPT
Dhanaraksha plus RP
Ph:0253-6685500
Email: sachin.sonawane@sbi-life.com
Website: www.sbilife.co.in
HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT OF SBI LIFE INSURANCE
SBI Life Insurance Company Limited (SBI Life) established in 2001 is a joint
venture between State Bank of India (SBI) and BNP Paribas Cardif S.A. and is
one of the leading life Insurance companies in India. SBI has an unrivalled
strength of over 22000 branches across the country making it the largest banking
group in India. BNP Paribas Cardif S.A. is the life and property & casualty
insurance arm of BNP Paribas one of the strongest banks in the world. SBI Life
offers a comprehensive range of life insurance and pension products.
The company offers individual and group products which include savings and
protection plans to address the insurance needs of diverse customer segments.
SBI Life has a multi-channel distribution network comprising of an expansive
Bancassurance channel with SBI and agent network comprising of 1.13 lakh
agents as on September 30 2018. The company's other distribution channels
include direct sales and sales through corporate agents brokers insurance
marketing firms and other intermediaries. As on September 30 2018 the
company had a widespread network of 848 offices across the Country.SBI Life
Insurance Company Limited was incorporated as a public limited company at
Mumbai on October 11 2000 and received certificate of commencement of
business from the RoC on November 20 2000.
The Company is registered with the IRDAI for carrying out business of life
insurance pursuant to the registration certificate dated March 29 2001. During
financial year 2002-03 SBI Life launched Bancassurance channel. It also paid its
first claim during the year. During financial year 2004-05 SBI Life's Assets
Under Management (AUM) crossed Rs 1000 crore mark. In January 2005 SBI
Life launched unit linked product. During financial year 2005-06 SBI Life
became the first new generation private life insurance company to make profit;
the company registered profit after tax of Rs 2.03 crore for the year.During
financial year 2007-08 SBI Life's Gross Written Premium (GWP) crossed the
milestone of Rs 5000 crore and AUM crossed the milestone of Rs 10000 crore.
The company also achieved cumulative breakeven during the year wiping out all
accumulated losses. During the year the company's share capital increased by Rs
500 crore to Rs 1000 crore. During financial year 2009-10 SBI Life's GWP
crossed the milestone of Rs 10000 crore. During financial year 2010-11 SBI
Life's branch network crossed the milestone of 500 branches.
ABOUT THE COMPANY
SBI Life Insurance is a joint venture between State Bank of India and BNP
Paribas Assurance SBI owns 74% of the total capital and BNP Paribas
Assurance the remaining 26%. SBI Life Insurance has an authorized capital
of Rs.2,000 crore and a paid up capital of Rs.1,000 crore. State Bank of
India enjoys the largest banking franchise in India. Along with its 6
Associate Banks, State Bank Group has the unrivalled strength of over
16,000 branches across the country, arguably the largest in the world. BNP
Paribas is the 1st largest French company and ranks 5th in the banking
industry worldwide, 1st bank in Euro Zone as per Global 2000 Forbes’ 2008.
It is 6th most valuable international banking brand as per Brand Finance
2008.
BNP Paribas Assurance is the insurance arm of BNP Paribas - Euro Zone’s
leading Bank. BNP Paribas, part of the worlds top 10 groups of banks by
market value and part of Europe top 3 banking companies, is one of the
oldest foreign banks with a presence in India dating back to 1860. BNP
Paribas Assurance is the fourth largest life insurance company in France,
and a worldwide leader in Creditor insurance products offering protection to
over 50 million clients. BNP Paribas Assurance operates in 41 countries
mainly through the Bancassurance and partnership model.
Multi-distribution Model
ACHIEVEMENTS IN 2017-2018
1.SBI life wins TISS leapvault CLO awards 2017 for L and D team of the year in the
insurance category.
2.SBI life was conferred the 3rd HR excellence business world award in order of merit for
excellence in HR technology.
3.SBI life once again adjudged as one of the most trusted brand 2017 for the seventh
consecutive year by the economic times brand equity.
4.SBI life wins the brand of the year 2017-2018 award in the insurance category by WCRC.
SWOT ANALYSIS
STRENGTHS:
• Since the tribe of life insurers has grown from 12 to 16, but SBI still
leads the private sector pack. SBI life is the Ranks among Global Top
Three at Million Dollar Round Table.
• Product innovation is a focus area for them. To stay relevant to the
consumer they work hard for innovating and developing new
products.
• Even today after it has rolled out so many campaigns, SBI remains
among the most trusted brand.
• SBI Life is fundamentally strong and the prospect of meeting its
policyholder's obligations as highest.
WEAKNESSES:
• Product awareness.
• Policies of govt. of India are favorable for the growth of the company.
THREATS:
• Capital requirement for setting up a life insurance company is very
high. The intensity of rivalry among private players is very high.
• Increased competition in the insurance sector.
CHAPTER 4
THEROTICAL BACKGROUND
Performance Appraisal
Meaning-
Needs-
Determination of Compensation:
Performance appraisal tells about how well employees have performed their
job responsibility. It helps to evaluate their performance and determine their
compensation fairly. If employees are compensated appropriately, they will
be motivated accordingly. If the compensation is not determined in
accordance to their performance, employees may be dissatisfied with their
job and the organization.
Reward management:
To motivate employees, appropriate reward provision have to be managed
which should be linked with performance appraisal. Employees will be
displeased if they don't receive appropriate reward for their better
performance. Similarly, if employees receive reward despite of their poor or
weak performance, employees won't be motivated to improve their
performance and this only increase the burden of the organization.
Performance appraisal helps to match the reward with the performance.
Motivation:
Performance appraisal itself serves as a means of motivation. Employees
who give their best performance will be evaluated and treated as valuable
and reliable employees. This sort of response will motivate the employees to
perform better. It further tells about the types of motivation to be provided to
employees based upon their performance.
Proper control:
Through performance appraisal, appropriate feedback regarding the job
performance, effectiveness and productivity can be provided to the
employees. This will help to know where the control is required and
improve the things. Performance appraisal provides an opportunity to learn
from the mistakes and helps to take corrective measures.
Career planning:
Policy formulation:
Performance appraisal provides information about employees and their
performance that serves as an input for training and development programs
as well as career development and motivational programs. This provides
suggestion in formulating appropriate human resource policy for the overall
development of the organization.
Methods-
Traditional Method:
Ranking Method:
It is the oldest and simplest formal systematic method of performance
appraisal in which employee is compared with all others for the purpose of
placing order of worth. The employees are ranked from the highest to the
lowest or from the best to the worst.
In doing this the employee who is the highest on the characteristic being
measured and also the one who is L lowest, are indicated. Then, the next
highest and the next lowest between next highest and lowest until all the
employees to be rated have been ranked. Thus, if there are ten employees to
be appraised, there will be ten ranks from 1 to 10.
Paired Comparison:
In this method, each employee is compared with other employees on one- on
one basis, usually based on one trait only. The rater is provided with a bunch
of slips each coining pair of names, the rater puts a tick mark against the
employee whom he insiders the better of the two. The number of times this
employee is compared as better with others determines his or her final
ranking.
Grading Method:
In this method, certain categories of worth are established in advance and
carefully defined. There can be three categories established for employees:
outstanding, satisfactory and unsatisfactory. There can be more than three
grades. Employee performance is compared with grade definitions. The
employee is, then, allocated to the grade that best describes his or her perfor-
mance.
Forced-Choice Method:
The forced-choice method is developed by J. P. Guilford. It contains a series
of groups of statements, and rater rates how effectively a statement describes
each individual being evaluated. Common method of forced-choice method
contains two statements, both positive and negative.
Check-List Method:
The basic purpose of utilizing check-list method is to ease the evaluation
burden upon the rater. In this method, a series of statements, i.e., questions
with their answers in ‘yes’ or ‘no’ are prepared by the HR department. The
check-list is, then, presented to the rater to tick appropriate answers relevant
to the appraisee. Each question carries a weight-age in relationship to their
importance.
When the check-list is completed, it is sent to the HR department to prepare
the final scores for all appraises based on all questions. While preparing
questions an attempt is made to determine the degree of consistency of the
rater by asking the same question twice but in a different manner
The form lists traits (such as quality and reliability) and a range of job
performance characteristics (from unsatisfactory to outstanding) for each
trait. The rating is done on the basis of points on the continuum. The
common practice is to follow five points scale.
The rater rates each appraisee by checking the score that best describes his
or her performance for each trait all assigned values for the traits are then
totaled.
Essay Method:
Essay method is the simplest one among various appraisal methods
available. In this method, the rater writes a narrative description on an
employee’s strengths, weaknesses, past performance, potential and
suggestions for improvement. Its positive point is that it is simple in use. It
does not require complex formats and extensive/specific training to
complete it.
However, essay method, like other methods, is not free from drawbacks. In
the absence of any prescribed structure, the essays are likely to vary widely
in terms of length and content. And, of course, the quality of appraisal
depends more upon rater’s writing skill than the appraiser’s actual level of
performance.
Moreover, because the essays are descriptive, the method provides only
qualitative information about the employee. In the absence of quantitative
data, the evaluation suffers from subjectivity problem. Nonetheless, the
essay method is a good start and is beneficial also if used in conjunction
with other appraisal methods.
Modern Method:
360-degree appraisal:
Any person having through knowledge about the job contents can appraise
an employee. According to this method all parties related to an organization
will be rating an employee. Thus, performance appraisal by supervisors,”
peers, subordinates, customer employees themselves, other users of service,
and consultants is known as 360-degree appraisal. 360-degree appraisal is a
systematic assessment of an employee regarding his present job, organi-
zational expectations and his potentialities for a better job.
Supervisor appraisal:
While appraising the performance, supervisors include superiors of
employee from the same department, departmental head or managers.
Usually, immediate superiors appraise the performance, which in turn is
reviewed by the departmental head or manager.
Peer appraisal:
Peer appraisal is experimental with military personnel so far. Peer Appraisal
is a method of evaluating the employee performance by his co-employees
rather than by his manager as they have sufficient opportunity to review the
performance on a daily basis.
Subordinates appraisal:
This is a novel method in which subordinates may be asked to evaluate the
superiors. This rating is quite useful in identifying competent superiors.
Self-appraisal:
If individuals understand the objectives, they are expected to achieve the
standards by which they are to be evaluated, they are to a great extent in the
best position to appraise their own performance. Since employees are
interested in the self-development, they appraise systematically and may
become highly motivated also.
The next thing you need to do is comparing the actual performance with the
anticipated or standard performance. This comparison is essential because it
makes it possible for you as the manager or evaluator to identify the
deviations of your employees from the established standards.
The results of the comparison may be depicted positive or negative results
that would call for appropriate action depending on how you deem the
results to be. Some of such actions include recalling, assessing and
scrutinizing data concerned with the performance of employee among many
others.
In SBI LIFE INSURANCE they have the system of performance appraisal of their
the performance, promote their employees and to arrange for their various training
programmes if they require for enhancing their skills in their respective areas and in
contribution enhancement..
Employees are evaluated by how well they accomplish a specific set of objectives
that have been determined to be critical in the successful completion of their job.
planning, self- control, and periodic reviews. In goal setting, the organization's overall
objectives are used as guidelines from which departmental and individual objectives
are set. In action planning, the means are determined for achieving the ends
established in goal setting. That is, realistic plans are developed to attain the
when behavior deviates from the standards established in the goal-setting phase. SBI
Company set goals to its employee by properly reporting with its employees and then
evaluating them upto what extent it has been achieved and if there is failure in
reaching the target what are the causes or reasons behind it.
Every evaluator has his or her own value system which acts as a standard against
which appraisals are made. Relative to the true or actual performance an individual
exhibits, some evaluator~ mark high and others low. The former is referred to as
positive leniency error and the latter as negative leniency error. When evaluators are
that is, rated higher than it actually should. Similarly, a negative leniency error
scope of error as far as the SBI LIFE INSURANCE company is concerned, but sometimes
about a description in the evaluating criteria. Thus, though chances are less, positive
As far as SBI LIFE INSURANCE company is concerned, there are four outcomes possible:
c. Good -If the performance evaluated by the management turns out to be good.
d. Below average -If the performance evaluated by the management turns out to
The time constraints enables the employee to show or project his/her capabilities in
term of performance as per the duration allowed. In SBI LIFE INSURANCE, the
Feedback
The company provides the annual feedback to its employees and thus, in term bring
out the highlights of the self assessment programmed. This enables the better
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Statement of the Problem
strength.
STAGE 2 – Collecting data using the survey method, by getting the sample
employees fill the questionnaire.
Observation method:
Definition:
Observation means viewing or seeing. We go on observing something or other
while we are awake. Most of such observations are just casual and have no
specific purpose. But observation as a method of data collection is different from
such casual viewing.
Interview method:
Definition:
A somewhat formal discussion between a hirer and an applicant or candidate
typically in person , in which information is exchanged, with the intention of
establishing the applicant’s suitability for a position
2. SECONDARY DATA
There are various methods of data gathering which involves the use of specific
recording forms. These are called tools or instruments of data collection.
During the course of conducting research, a researcher has to collect the data
through adopting one or the other method.
Websites
Books
Magazines
Brochures etc.
Sample size:-
50 respondents
Method of research:–
An observational study. Probability sampling is more reliable. It is more time and
money consuming. The sample size of consumers surveyed was 50 respondents.
Limitations-
Results are just an indication of the present scenario and may not be applicable in
the future.
As the study was conducted only in Nashik area, so it can be said that the study
was regional biased.
Since sampling was done under the simple random sampling method, where easily
approachable respondents were picked up. So this may not represent the whole
universe.
Respondent may fill the partially correct information in questionnaire.
DATA ANALYSIS AND
INTERPRETATION
1. Are you aware about the organization performance appraisal system?
a) YES b) NO
OPINION NO. OF PERCENTAGE
RESPONDENTS
50 100
YES
0 0
NO
50 100
TOTAL
YES
NO
From the above it is evident that 100% of the employees feel that
performance appraisal is quit essential for any organization.
2. Do you think that performance appraisal is essential?
a) YES b) NO
YES 48 96
NO 2 4
TOTAL 50 100
YES
NO
From the above data it is evident that 96% of the respondents feel that
performance appraisal is very essential in the organization, where as 45
employees feel it is not essential in organization.
3. Does appraisal system of your organization facilities career growth &
learning?
a) YES b) NO
YES 42 84
NO 8 16
TOTAL 50 100
From the above data it shows that 84% of employees feel that organization
facilitate growth & learning due to performance appraisal, where as 16% of
employees feel that organization does not provides growth & learning of
employees.
4. Is the current performance appraisal system really assesses the quality of
an employee.
Do you agree?
a) YES b) NO
OPINION NO.OF PERCENTAGE
RESPONDENTS
YES 46 92
NO 4 8
TOTAL 50 100
YES
NO
From the above data it is evident that 92% of the employees feel that the
performance appraisal system really assesses the quality of an employee,
where as 85 feel that it does not assesses the quality of an employee.
5. Periodicity of performance appraisal should be on
c) Annual basis
A 8 16
B 12 24
C 30 60
TOTAL 50 100
A
B
From the above data it is evident that 60%of the employees feel that
performance appraisal should be done on annual basis & 24% of the
employees feel should be in done on half yearly basis 165 of the employees
feel should be done in quarterly basis.
6The present performance appraisal of your organization distinguishes the
performers & non performers?
A
B
C
From the above data it is evident that 74% of the employees „agree‟ that
performance appraisal system of the organization distinguishes performs &
non performers, where as 105 strongly agree and 16% disagree doesn‟t
distinguishes performers & non-performers.
7 A monthly performance appraisal of employee is required for
maintaining efficiency of individuals &l organization?
a) YES b) NO
YES
NO
From the above it shows that 96% of the employees feel that periodic
performance appraisal of the employee is required for maintaining efficiency
of individual and organization and above 4% of the employees feel that it is
not required to maintained.
8Are you aware of the basis or attributes on which your performance is
appraised?
a) YES b) NO
YES
NO
From them above data it shows that 82% of the employees are aware on
which their performance is appraised but 16% of the respondents feel that
they are not aware of the basis on which their performance is appraised.
9Performance appraisal should be based upon
A
B
C
From the above data it shows that 54% of the employees feel that
performance appraisal in railways is based upon performance 36% feel that
it based on both performance and recommendation 7 trade union.
10Performance appraisal is useful to the contributor to encourage people to
perform better on their jobs?
a) YES b) NO
YES
NO
From the above data it shows that 92%of the employees feel that
performance appraisal is contributor to encourage better job, but 8% of the
employees feel that it is not a contributor for job.
11The existing appraisal system is helping each employee to discover his/her
potential & make their short comings?
c) Strongly Disagree
A
B
C
From the above data it shows that 76% of the employees feel that appraisal
system discovers potential and make their short comings and 125 employees
feel that it does not discover potential.
FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION:
Findings:
It has been found that most of the employees think that the
performance appraisal is essential and they think it is used as a
tool to improve performance, to determine organization needs,
and to basis for pay increase, promotions, and transfer.
The appraisal system facilitates growth & learning of employees
and it is used to distinguish performers.
The existing appraisal system helps the management to identify
potentiality of employees as well as useful for maintaining
efficiency of the individual & organization.
Some employees that they do not know which basis their
performance is appraised and most of the employees feel that it
help them discover their potential and enables to know their
short coming.
Organization provides training & development programs to
overcome the short comings identified in performance appraisal.
The employees that their promotions match their contributions
and new performance appraisal technique should be adopted in
the organization and the short comings are informed to them.
The performance appraisal supports to experiment with new
ideas as basis for promotion.
RECOMMENDATION:
The performance appraisal system should facilitate career growth
& learning of employees.
The short coming of employees should be informed to them
after performance appraisal promptly.
Promotion should be based on performance rather than seniority or
any other factors.
Performance appraisal should be appraised by granting awards/
merit certificate.
New performance appraisal techniques such as 360 degree
performance appraisal system should be used.
The performance appraisal should not be assessed by biased mind
and personal grudge.
Feedback should not be given to the employees more frequently.
Name (Optional):_
Age:
Gender:
Department/ Role:
a) Yes b) No
a) Yes b) No
a) Yes b) No
a) Yes b) No
c) Annual basis
a) Yes b) No
a) YES b) NO
a) YES b) NO
c) Strongly Disagree
Conclusion
Performance appraisal is the systematic observation and evaluation
of employees’ performance. Some of the most commonly used
performance appraisal methods include the judgmental approach,
the absolute standards approach, and the results-oriented approach.
Ideally, performance appraisal should be completely accurate and
objective. However, the performance appraisal process is far from
accurate and objective, sometimes resulting in rating errors. Common
rating errors include strictness or leniency, central tendency, halo
effect, and recency of events.
References
Bratton, J. (2012). Human resource management: Theory and practice. New
York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Deblieux, M. (2003). Performance appraisal
source book: A collection of practical samples. Alpharetta, GA: Society for
Human Resource Management. Dessler, G. (2012). Human resource
management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Fletcher, C. (2009).
Appraisal, feedback, and development: Making performance review work. New
York, NY: Routledge. Grote, R. C. (2011). How to be good at performance
appraisals: Simple, effective, done right. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business
Review Press. Guerra-Lopez, I. J. (2009). Performance evaluation: Proven
approaches to improving program and organizational performance. New York,
NY: Wiley. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1994). A theory of goal setting and task
performance (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Rothwell, W. J.
(2012). Encyclopedia of human resource management set-3 volumes. New
York, NY: Wiley