Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Abstract--In the advanced technology low power, speed and of logic circuit that thinks about the relative magnitudes of
size play a significant role specifically in the field of magnitude these two variables. The block diagram of magnitude
VLSI circuits. In this paper small power dissipation and less comparator appears in Fig 1. The result of magnitude
area over conventional 2- bit comparator is proposed and using comparator is determined by three variables that
this comparator a new style 12-bit comparator is proposed. The demonstrate whether A>B, A<B, or A=B.
main objective of this paper is to design and implement of
magnitude comparator using different logic techniques and
compared in terms of power consumption, propagation delay
and transistor count. The results of this paper are simulated on
the EDA tanner tool realized in 45-nanometer technology at
0.7v supply voltage.
I. INTRODUCTION
The power consumption is a vital issue in magnitude
CMOS circuits, where different techniques and technologies
are used to design circuits for low power dissipation with
small size and high-speed interface applications are
developed.
Circuit size relies on upon the quantity of transistors and Fig. 1. Block diagram of magnitude comparator.
their sizes and on the wiring complexity [1]. The wiring
intricacy is dictated by the quantity of associations and their The first phase in the comparison processor of the two-bit
lengths. Therefore, the wiring complexity may fluctuate magnitude comparator is to check the greatest bit A0 and B0.
significantly from one logic style to another and On the off chance that greatest bit of both inputs are
consequently, the legitimate decision of logic style is critical distinctive, e.g. assume the greatest bit of A is more
for circuit execution [2]. prominent than B in that case A>B and if the greatest bit of
Magnitude comparator has several utilities like those are B is more prominent than A at that moment A<B. In the
utilized as a part of microprocessor and embedded systems. event, that greatest bit of both inputs is equivalent after that
In this paper, magnitude comparator is designed using go for next step. The second step is to check the following
different techniques with the low power consumption and relating bits A1 and B1 of both the inputs. On the off chance
higher packing densities in 45-nanometer technology at 0.7v that next comparing bit of A is more noteworthy than B at
supply voltage. that moment A>B and if information condition is switch,
subsequently A<B. In the event that, both inputs are same
II. TWO-BIT MAGNITUDE COMPARATOR
subsequently A=B [7]. Equation (1), (2) and (3) is given to
In magnitude logic system, the traditional method of control the outputs of the two-bit magnitude comparator.
comparison of two variable A (A0, A1) and B (B0, B1) of a
two-bit binary number is a logical operation that figures out
whether A is less than B, A is greater than B and A equal to
B [3], [4]. Therefore, the magnitude comparator is such type
978-1-5090-4724-6/17/$31.00 ©2017 IEEE
2017 Devices for Integrated Circuit (DevIC), 23-24 March, 2017, Kalyani, India 104
Fig. 10. Design of N-bit magnitude comparator using X-E logic technique.
Fig. 12. Schematic of the two-bit magnitude comparator using the CMOS
logic technique.
Fig. 14. Schematic of the two-bit magnitude comparator using half adder
Fig. 17. Schematic of 12-bit magnitude comparator using half adder logic
logic technique.
technique .
Fig. 18 . Layout of the optimized half adder logic based 12-bit magnitude
comparator.
Fig.15. Schematic of the X-E logic based two-bit magnitude comparator. TABLE III PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF TWO-BIT
MAGNITUDE COMPARATOR
Paramete Conven Transm Propose Half X-E Half
rs -tional ission d adder logic adder
2-bit Gate Transmi logic based logic
compar logic[6] ssion based 2-bit based
ator Gate 2-bit comp 12-bit
logic compar arator comp
based 2- ator arator
bit
compara
tor
Power
0.12
consumpt 0.62 0.47 0.28 0.33 0.61
ion (µW)
Number
of 54 74 30 20 25 120
transistor
Propagati
7.63
on delay 8.40 8.49 6.87 7.96 3.13
(n-sec)
Power
delay 0.82 1.90
5.20 3.99 2.13 2.62
Fig. 16. Layout of the optimized half adder logic based two-bit magnitude Product
comparator. (µ-nJ)
2017 Devices for Integrated Circuit (DevIC), 23-24 March, 2017, Kalyani, India 109
IX. CONCLUSIONS
To enhance the performance of a magnitude comparator we
have designed magnitude comparator using different logic
techniques. After simulation of all kinds of outline
strategies, the last results are gotten for Power Consumption,
Delay and Power Delay Product. Power utilization of the
half adder logic based two-bit magnitude comparator is
0.12µW which is almost 74.46% less than existing
transmission gate logic based two-bit magnitude
comparator[6]. It has been found that the transistor count is
less in the proposed transmission gate logic circuit which is
almost 69.69% less than existing transmission gate logic
based two-bit magnitude comparator, subsequently that the
overall area is minimized. According to this half adder logic
technique a 12-bit magnitude comparator is designed which
has 0.61 microwatt power consumption and 3.13
nanosecond propagation delay.
References
[1] S. Kang and Y. Leblebici : ‘CMOS Magnitude Integrated Circuit,
Analysis and Design’ (Tata McGraw-Hill, 3rd Ed, 2003). 295-302.
[2] A. Bellaouar and Mohamed I. Elmasry, “Low Power Magnitude VLSI
Design: Circuits and Systems” (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2nd Ed,
1995).
[3] S. Salivahanan and S. Arivazhagan (2004): ‘Magnitude Circuits and
Design’ (2nd Ed).
[4] M.Morris Mano: ‘Magnitude Design’ (Pearson Education Asia. 3rd
Ed, 2002).
[5] Dinesh Sharma, Microelectronics group, EE Department IIT Bombay,
“Logic Design”, http://www.ee.iitb.ac.in/~smdp/DKStutorials/logic-
notes.pdf, pp.1-34.
[6] Anjuli, Satyajit Anand: ‘two-bit Magnitude Comparator Design Using
Different Logic Styles’ International Journal of Engineering Science
Invention, ISSN (Online): 2319 – 6734, ISSN (Print): 2319 – 6726
www.ijesi.org Volume 2 Issue 1 PP.13-24, January. 2013.
[7] Vijaya Shekhawat, Tripti Sharma and K. G. Sharma: ‘Low Power
Magnitude Comparator Circuit Design’ International Journal of
Computer Applications (0975 – 8887), Volume 94 – No 1, May 2014