Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
net/publication/259369028
CITATIONS READS
7 484
1 author:
Manikandan Vairavan
Kalasalingam University
76 PUBLICATIONS 711 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Manikandan Vairavan on 23 October 2015.
34
International Journal of Mining, Metallurgy & Mechanical Engineering (IJMMME) Volume 1, Issue 1 (2013) ISSN 2320–4060 (Online)
for processing of PMC is fly ash. Fly ash is one of the balls. The ball mill is a key piece of equipment for grinding
residues generated in combustion of coal in Thermal power crushed materials, and it is widely used in production lines for
plants and comprises the fine particles that rise with the flue powders such as cement, silicates, refractory material,
gases. Fly ash is generally captured by electrostatic fertilizer, glass ceramics, etc. as well as for ore dressing of
precipitators or other particle filtration equipment before the both ferrous and non-ferrous metals. The ball mill can grind
flue gases reach the chimneys of coal-fired power plants. The various ores and other materials either wet or dry. The size
dimensions of the fly ash particle are in the range of 5 to 50 reduction of fly ash particle is performed by using the above
μm and the color is grey in nature. Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 shows the techniques. The ball mill is operated for different time periods
photographic image of the epoxy resin and fly ash. (4hrs, 6hrs and 8 hrs) to get different particle size. The milled
sample fly ash particle size was analyzed by particle size
analyzer equipment. It is found that the sizes of the particles
are 480 nm, 350 nm and 300 nm respectively.
SEM is one of the best and most widely used techniques for
the chemical and physical characterization of fly ash. The
three most common modes of operation in SEM analysis are
backscattered electron imaging (BSE), secondary electron
imaging (SEI), and EDS. In this study, BSE and EDS were
used to characterize the fly ash samples. A representative
Fig 1. Epoxy Resin Fig 2. Fly ash portion of fly ash particles was sprinkled onto double-sided
carbon tape mounted on a SEM stub. This grain mount enable
B. Planetary Ball milling technique to determine the particle morphology, external surface
structure and external elemental distribution of individual fly
A planetary ball mills is a type of ball mill. Planetary ball ash particles.
mills are smaller than common ball mills and mainly used in The morphology of a fly ash particle is controlled by
laboratories for grinding sample material down to very small combustion temperature and cooling rate. The majority of the
sizes. A planetary ball mill consists of at least one grinding jar particles ranged in size from approximately 1μm to 5 μm and
which is arranged eccentrically on a so-called sun wheel. The consisted of solid spheres (Fig.5). Agglomerated particles and
direction of movement of the sun wheel is opposite to that of irregularly shaped amorphous particles shown in figure 5 may
the grinding jars (ratio: 1:-2 or 1:-1 or else). The grinding have been due to inter-particle contact or rapid cooling.
balls in the grinding jars are subjected to superimposed
rotational movements, so called as Coriolis forces. The
difference in speeds between the balls and grinding jars
produces an interaction between frictional and impact forces,
which releases high dynamic energies. The interplay between
these forces produces the high and very effective degree of
size reduction of the planetary ball mill.
35
International Journal of Mining, Metallurgy & Mechanical Engineering (IJMMME) Volume 1, Issue 1 (2013) ISSN 2320–4060 (Online)
D. Specimen preparation
Fig. 8 Hardness testing m/c Fig. 9 Impact testing m/c
Fly ash impregnated polymer matrix composite
specimens used in this work are manufactured by pouring the
The determination of the Rockwell hardness (Fig.8) of a fly
mixture contain both fly ash and epoxy resin in the required
ash impregnated epoxy composite material involves the
size of mould. Before that the measured quantity of the fly ash
application of a minor load followed by a major load, and then
say 10 wt % is put into the epoxy resin and mixed it evenly by
noting the depth of penetration. The main advantage of
using mechanical stirrer. Hardener is added with the mixture
Rockwell hardness is its ability to display hardness values
for quick setting of composite specimen. TABLE I shows that
directly, thus obviating tedious calculations involved in other
the different size of fly ash fillers impregnated with epoxy
hardness measurement techniques. It is typically used in
resin for the synthesis of composite specimens.
engineering and metallurgy. Its commercial popularity arises
from its speed, reliability, robustness, resolution and small
TABLE I Different Size of fly ash fillers
area of indentation. In order to get a reliable reading the
S. No Specimen Size of Fly ash filler
thickness of the test-piece should be at least 10 times the depth
of the indentation. Also, readings should be taken from a flat
1 S1 50 μm perpendicular surface, because convex surfaces give lower
readings. A correction factor can be used if the hardness of a
2 S2 300 nm convex surface must be measured.
The Charpy impact test (Fig.9), also known as the Charpy v-
3 S3 350 nm notch test, is a standardized high strain-rate test which
determines the amount of energy absorbed by a fly ash
4 S4 480 nm
impregnated epoxy composite material during fracture. Figure
10 shows the fractured specimen after impact. This absorbed
The molding box surface was covered with wax plastic energy is a measure of a given material's toughness and acts as
sheets along with wax polish, which acts as a releasing agent a tool to study temperature-dependent ductile-brittle transition.
for easy and quick removal of composite panel. It is clearly It is widely applied in industry, since it is easy to prepare and
shown in figure 6. After sometime the specimen is taken out conduct and results can be obtained quickly and cheaply. A
from the mould for mechanical testing which is shown in Fig. major disadvantage is that all results are only comparative.
7
36
International Journal of Mining, Metallurgy & Mechanical Engineering (IJMMME) Volume 1, Issue 1 (2013) ISSN 2320–4060 (Online)
minor load and 140kg major load. The impact strength was with decreasing fly ash filler size. The impact strength
analyzed on charpy impact testing machine as per ASTM 256 increased in the case of smaller particle size fly ash which
standard. The results obtained from both the mechanical confirmed that the void space available in the larger particle
testing are discussed below. size fly ash material. Therefore the stress propagation was
greater in the case of a larger fly ash particle size filled
A. Effect of fly ash filler size on Hardness composites than that of a smaller fly ash particle size
The hardness values shown in Fig. 11 indicated that composites.
decrease in fly ash filler size increases the hardness. The
addition of fly ash filler increases the hardness of composite IV CONCLUSION
material due to increase in the resistance strength of polymer In this work the residue from the thermal power plant is
to plastic deformation. The composite with 300 nm size fly utilized as filler material in the polymer matrix composite
ash filler yields higher hardness value than other filler sizes materials. Morphological and elemental characterization of fly
due to the better adhesion between the matrix and the filler. ash was performed by SEM and EDS. Micron level fly ash
In this case, the polymeric matrix phase and the solid filler particle was converted into Nano level by means of ball
phase would be pressed together and touch each other more milling technique. The composite specimens are prepared by
tightly. Thus the interface can transfer pressure more impregnating four different sizes (50 μm, 480 nm, 350 nm,
effectively in smaller size fly ash filler than larger one. This and 300 nm) of fly ash filler materials by using molding
might have resulted in an enhancement of hardness. process. Mechanical testing such as hardness and impact test
was carried out. It is found that the 300 nm size fly ash filler
impregnated polymer composite yields better impact energy
(14 J) and hardness value (35 Hv) than others. Thus by
decreasing the size of fly ash filler leads to increase the
interface between the polymeric matrix and the solid fillers.
This work paves a scope for future investigators to obtain
the size of filler materials less than 100 nm for better
enhancement of mechanical and physical properties of
particulate reinforced polymer composites.
REFERENCES
1. Bernd Wetzel, Frank Haupert, Ming Qiu Zhang, “Epoxy nanocomposites
Fig 11. Effect on hardness for various sizes of fly ash filler with high mechanical and tribological performance” Composites Science
and Technology 63 (2003) 2055–2067.
2. Amar Patnaik and Alok Satapathy, “Erosion Wear Response of Flyash-
B. Effect of fly ash filler size on Impact Properties Glass Fiber-Polyester Composites: A Study using Taguchi Experimental
The Charpy impact test was used to evaluate the relative Design” Malaysian Polymer Journal, Vol. 4, No.2, p 13-28, 2009.
3. Mishra s and Shimpi N G, “Comparison of nano CaCO3 and fly ash filled
toughness of the test materials which is reported in energy lost styrene butadiene rubber on mechanical and thermal properties” Journal
per unit of specimen thickness or cross sectional area. High of scientific and industrial research Vol.64, October 2005, pp.744-751.
strain rates or impact loads may be expected in many 4. Dr. Najat J. Saleh & Samir Nassaf Mustafa, “A Study of Some
engineering applications of composite materials. Mechanical, Thermal and Physical Properties of Polymer Blend with Iraqi
Kaolin Filler” Eng. & Tech. Journal, Vol.29, No.11, 2011.
5. Sohn JE, J Adhesion 19:15 (1985).
6. Mohapatra R. and Rajagopala Rao J., J. Chem. Tech and Biotech., 76,
2001, 9-26
7. Pedlow J. W., Cenospheres, in Coal ash utilization Fly ash, Bottom ash
and Slag, Ed. Torrey S., Noyes Data Corporation, N.J., 1978, 353-362
8. Rothon, R. N. (1997). Mineral Fillers in Thermoplastics: Filler
Manufacture, Journal of Adhesion, 64:87–109.
9. Rothon, R. N. (1999). Effects of Particulate Fillers on Flame Retardant
Properties of Composites, Advanced Polymer Science, 139: 67–107.
10. Kishore, SM Kulkarni, D Sunil and S Sharathchandra, “Effect of surface
treatment on the impact behaviour of fly-ash filled polymer composites”
Polym Int 51:1378–1384 (2002).
11. ASTM D 785 Standard test method for hardness.
12. ASTM 256 Standard test method for impact strength.
Fig 12. Effect on impact strength for various sizes of fly ash filler
37
International Journal of Mining, Metallurgy & Mechanical Engineering (IJMMME) Volume 1, Issue 1 (2013) ISSN 2320–4060 (Online)
38