NATURAL BORN CITIZEN AGAIN - 2019

1. Natural Born Citizen is a Natural Law term. Natural meaning, not a man-made Law, a law
existing in nature alone and inalienable to man’s laws.
2. By the laws of nature alone, all rights pass from birth Father to child at birth. In the case of
natural citizenship, a child becomes a citizen of the country of their Father at birth, by mere tacit
consent.
3. NBC is the right of every child to be born a legal citizen of the country to which the birth Father
is a legal citizen. No man-made law can strip a child of this natural right. These are known as
“true citizens” by natural birthright alone.
4. The natural born citizen requirements in Article II exists to protect the Oval Office from
occupation by foreign agents or anyone with dual or divided national interests and loyalties.
5. Born on soil is “native” born, which is the basis for 14th Amendment man-made birthright
citizenship under statute law. It is a form of mass naturalization under man-made laws. This is
the basis for “anchor baby” naturalization.
6. Much of the modern confusion comes from the fact that at present, the USA has two types of
"birthright citizenship." One made by Nature (Natural Born Citizen) and the other made by man
under the 14th Amendment (Native Born citizen - aka anchor baby). The big C and small c are
important. The big C indicates "true Citizen" by natural right alone, which the small c indicates a
citizen by the laws on man, only, not a "true Citizen."
7. The matter has been further complicated in recent history, by the demand for “equality.” Many
females seeking total equality with males want the Natural Rights to pass from mother, as an
equal to the father. Government officials want “undocumented citizens” (aka illegal aliens) to
have the same rights as all legal citizens of the USA. They want “anchor baby” to be equal to
“Natural Born Citizen” so that they can occupy the Oval Office just the same as any “true
Citizen,” a Natural Born Citizen, as required by Article II of the US Constitution.
8. To further complicate the matter, certain political interests seek to make Natural Born Citizen a
more restrictive term, by claiming that a person must be both “natural” and “native” born to
qualify as a “true Citizen” eligible for high office. Although their intent may be honorable, the
result of this effort is to further destroy the NBC term and requirement for high office by making
the term “legally ambiguous,” (potentially having more than one meaning), and therefore,
unenforceable under the law, leaving the Oval Office wide open to anyone from anywhere on
earth.
8-a, - People seeking to disqualify Senator John Sidney McCain in the 2008 election used a
bastardized interpretation of NBC to make their claim against McCain. Although McCain was a
Vietnam War veteran and the son of American parents, the claim against McCain was based
upon the fact that he was not "native" born within the borders of the USA. It’s the only claim
they could make, but they had to bastardize the NBC term in order to make it. McCain was born
to a US Navy Admiral stationed in Panama at the time of McCain's birth. In order to make a
claim against McCain's eligibility, they had to make that claim on the basis of him not being
"native born" as there was no other way to attempt to disqualify McCain. The result of their
effort did not disqualify McCain, but it did elect Barack Obama, who is believed to be the son of
a non-citizen of the USA, a Father from Kenya with British citizenship.
9. “Bastard” – today, this term is seen as only a curse or slur against any child born out of wedlock,
and the term is entirely socially unacceptable as a result. However, in its original definition,
there is an important purpose to the term as it relates to mankind and society. There is no such
thing as a “fatherless child.” If there were no father, there would be no child. The historical point
of this term is to identify a child for which we simply cannot know who the natural birth father is
and therefore, cannot know the loyalties of that father. The natural birth mother is always
known, but the father is not always known.

Barack Obama example: To this day, it is NOT certain who Barack Obama’s real birth father is,
even after he served out two full terms in the Oval Office. What is certain is Barack Obama is not
a Natural Born Citizen of the United States and he was, therefore, never constitutionally eligible
to occupy the Oval Office.

Ted Cruz example: Unlike Obama, the Cruz documentation is entirely clear. Ted was “native
born” in Canada to parents who at the time, were NOT legal citizens of the United States.
Therefore, Ted Cruz has no USA citizenship documentation at all, he is as “undocumented” in
the USA as any other “undocumented alien” in the USA today. Ted’s documentation confirms
that he was “born Canadian” and never naturalized to the USA under U.S. Naturalization
Statutes. His legal argument has been based upon a 14th Amendment claim of “acquired
citizenship: via U.S. Naturalization Laws. But there are no documents to back up his claim in this
regard. In May of 2014, Ted “renounced his Canadian citizenship” confirming that he had been a
Canadian citizen from birth until that moment. It is not possible for Ted Cruz to be a Natural
Born Citizen of the USA on the basis of his own public records. In fact, Ted Cruz was still a legal
citizen of Canada when he ran for and was elected a US Senator for Texas in 2012.

So, I ask you now, what is a Natural Born Citizen and why does it matter? Can we prevent the
next foreign agent from occupying the Oval Office, now that Obama has served two terms as an
illegitimate occupant?