Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
MAJIDA C.K
Thesis Advisor
UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT
2018
The study entitled ―comparative content analysis of print media coverage of Kisan Long
March in English and Malayalam dailies‖ by Majida C.K in partial fulfillment for the degree
of Master of Communication and Journalism is hereby accepted.
Accepted as partial fulfillment for the Degree of Master of Communication and Journalism
by University of Calicut.
Date: Head
Department of Journalism
and Mass Communication
Date: Chairman
Board of Examiners
DECLARATION
University of Calicut
Date:
MAJIDA C.K
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the dissertation entitled ―comparative content analysis of print media
coverage of Kisan Long March in English and Malayalam dailies‖ is a record of bonafide
study and research carried out by Majida C.K under my supervision and guidance.
Date
Assistant Professor
University of Calicut
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I bow before the almighty for giving me the strength to successfully complete the work in
time.
I to express sincere gratitude to my thesis advisor Mr. Ramis Salam, Assistant Professor,
Department of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Calicut, for his
guidance and Support. I am thankful to Dr.Muhammadali.N, Head of the department,
Department of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Calicut for his support.
I owe thanks to a very special person my husband, Junaise for his continued and unfailing
love and support during my thesis work. I would not have been able to complete the
process if you had not displayed enthusiasm and pride in my achievements.
Majida C.K
TABLE OF CONTENT
1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………..1
2 Review of Literature…………..………………..…………………..………………………10
3.6.7 Prominence……………………………………………………………..…....21
5 Discussion nd Conclusion………………..….………………….……….….………….38
5.1 Discussion…………………………………………………………..……….…………38
5.2 Conclusion………………………………………………..……...………...…………..38
5.3 Recommendations……...……………………….…………………………..………..40
References……………………………………………….……………………………………41
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
Title
No. No.
4.1.1 25
Page wise categorization of news stories
INTRODUCTION
Mass media perform significant role in the process of change. It refers as a means
or agency for communicating, transmitting or diffusing information to the public. Media
is the fourth pillar of the democracy. It has the power of developing images, generate
the opinion and cast the behavior. Media in India are very influential and had reached
grass root level people. They determine people‘s thinking, modify their opinion, and
shape social interface. Mass media bring new values in the system. Van den Ban and
Hawkins (1996) point out that the mass media does this in a different of ways
including setting agenda for major discussion, ideas, topics, transferring knowledge,
forming and changing opinions and behavior.
The print, electronic and social media all over the country played a significant role on
coverage of Kisan Long March. They also highlighted the agrarian crisis and burning
peasant issues which have significance for the whole country.
Centre for Media Studies, conducted a study the manner in which the English-
language Indian press presented the causes and consequences of these and other
farmer protests between mid March and mid July. For the study, they used Media
Cloud—an open-source news analysis platform developed in collaboration by the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Lab and Harvard University to examine
the content of news websites. The tool facilitated several kinds of text analyses,
including finding out the most frequently used words in a set of 1stories and detecting
the overall theme of an article. The websites that Media Cloud analyzed included
legacy newspapers such as the Times of India and The Hindu, broadcast sources
such as NDTV and Times Now, websites such as The Wire and Scroll.in, as well as
small blogs and sites that carry news about India.
The farmers decided to come to Delhi to gain the attention of the national
media and thus modified their protests for its consumption. They came up with
innovative, even provocative, ways to protest: they held rats and snakes between
their teeth, wore a garland of skulls which they claimed belonged to farmers who had
committed suicide, threatened to consume their own urine and stripped when they
were denied an audience with Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The farmers found
limited success in gaining responsible media coverage. While their methods saw
coverage in mainstream media, the issues they had been raising barely got any
attention. Given that the protest was not accompanied by digital outreach and social
media campaigns, the mainstream media‘s coverage formed the primary narrative of
the protests.
The study also revealed that the media covered the protests through an
extremely political lens. A certain degree of coverage of relevant politicians‘
responses to the issue is a crucial addition to the overall coverage. However, in the
media, political reactions are not only a way to gauge the importance of a story; they
also constitute a sub-genre of political news. The focus, once again, moved from the
causes of the protests to the political players that stood to gain or lose from them.
Nearly 80 percent of the stories made direct mention of ministers or political parties.
The most frequently used word in these stories was ―minister.‖ Much of the reportage
focused on drought and farmer suicides, with a third of the stories examined
identifying them as the causes of the protests. The actual causes of the protests,
specified by the farmers themselves, such as rising cost of production, credit
diversion to corporations, rural unemployment and minimum support prices, was
replaced by the familiar narrative of drought and farmer suicides.
According to Delhi based Centre for Media Studies, between the years 2012-
16, the news coverage to 6,40,000 villages in India on front pages is merely 0.26 %.
It was the average percentage of 5 years. Meanwhile, the news coverage to
agriculture in the mainstream Hindi and English newspaper in Delhi were 0.07 and
0.17 percentage respectively. Most of the agriculture sector news items published
were the notifications from the state and central agriculture department and the
campaigns of the agri- business companies. The mainstream dailies made no
genuine coverage on the issues related with farmers and agriculture. According to the
statistics of National Crime Bureau, 3, 10,000 farmers committed suicide due to
financial loss and debts between 1995 to 2015. The numbers are not accurate, and
suicide tall is even higher as many such incidents are not reported.
More stories on the rights and entitlements of the poor could help. The
press can add does make a difference when its functions. Governments do react
and respond to the press in the country. The Indian press has been very strong in
some respects. But it has proved increasingly inept at covering process, especially,
the development process. The biggest journals in this country gave far more space
to Imran Khan‘s wedding than to the starvation deaths (Sainath, 1996).
The decline of agriculture media coverage also has strong ties to systamatic
pressures within the media industry, such as demand from profit, the need to
satisfy advertisers and dwelling resources. Rural and agricultural sector in India
have long remained less portrayal in the media. Al Jazeera feature on coverage of
agriculture in Indian media quoted a study by the Centre for Media Studies which
examined six English and Hindi newspapers including the Times of India, The Hindu,
Dainik Bhaskar and Dainik Jagran over the course of two months in 2015 and
discovered that the percentage of front-page stories portrayal on rural India was zero.
The Hindu was an exception; 1.37 percent of its stories were on topic. Looking at six
broadcast news outlets, including DD News, Zee News and NDTV, explained that
rural news did not receive more than seven minutes of prime time on any of the
surveyed based on news channels. Most of the employees at these organizations
have an urban background and are based in the cities. News, then, is produced by
and for urban society. Farming and agriculture are covered only during particular
episode or crisis. Such episodic reporting decided how urban India understands rural
India.
The obsession with political ideology is the common fact to most coverage of
agriculture stories. The study conducted by Media Cloud to examined news reporting
across English-language publications in India in 2016 found that out of all the stories
that used the words ―farm,‖ ―agri‖ and ―agro,‖ only 4.4 percent of all news was about
farming or agriculture. The rest of the stories had politics as their central idea.
The Kisan march was unique in the way it was conducted with discipline,
determination and a collective coordination of peasant power. The sight of a sea of
red flags moving in a massive march captured the attention of people everywhere
and the national and regional media took this visual message to all corners of the
country‖. No mass protest in recent times has had the nationwide impact as the Kisan
Long March (Dhawale, Long March: A brilliant Victory, 2018).
The Kisan Long March led by All India Kisan Sabha (AIKS) in Maharashtra
captured the nation‘s attention to the agrarian crisis in rural Maharashtra and forced
the government to agree most of the demands raised by them. Political parties across
the ideological spectrum supported the farmers demand ranging from All India Kisan
Sabha of CPI (M), which had conducted the march, Congress, Nationalist Congress
Party, Aam Aadmi Party, Republican Party, Samajwadi Party, Maharashtra
Navnirman Sena (MNS) and even the Shiv Sena, which is a partner in the state
government. The farmers protest offered an opportunity to develop an alternative
political narrative based on issues that impact the lives of ordinary people and it was
effectively articulated through a mass movement.
The protestors were from a few regions of Maharashtra, but spoke for every
farmer and laborer in the country. In September 2016, the Bombay High Court
expressed its dismay over the death of 17,000 persons in tribal areas of the state, in
just the preceding 12 months, due to malnutrition. A great majority of those who
marched to Mumbai constituted of tribal people, which brought to clear idea to the
agrarian crisis faced by rural Maharashtra.
The All India Kisan Sabha demands that the tribal villages not be submerged
and that the water is made available to these districts and to other drought-prone
districts in Maharashtra. Over the past two years, the BJP governments at the centre
and at the state have betrayed the assurances given to the peasantry. This list of
demands and grievances has been ignored. The Kisan Sabha organized the Long
rally to condemn the BJP state and central governments for consistent betrayals
(Dhawale, A Remarkable Struggle, 2018).
According to NITI Aayog evaluation report (2016) on MSP pointed out that
79% farmer reacted in the negative when asked if they were satisfied with the MSP
regime. Some of the reasons for their disappointment were delay announcement of
MSP rates, lack of infrastructure at procurement centres, distance to procurement
centres and delayed in payments.
Economists and bankers have argued against loan waivers stating that they
give rise to the moral hazard problem and encourage credit indiscipline. The State
Bank of India chairman Arundhati Bhattacharya states that ―We feel that in case of a
(farm) loan waiver there is always a fall in credit discipline because the people who
get the waiver have expectations of future waivers as well. As such future loans given
often remain unpaid.‖
Unlike the off-made demands of ensuring a loan waiver to farmers, the
focus here was more on gaining rights over the land they have been struggling for
generations. The administration‘s laziness and the lack of good political policy will
have delayed the implementation of the Forest Rights Act.
―In its preface, the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers
(Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 (Forest Rights Act for short), identified the
historical injustice meted out to Scheduled Tribes (ST) and other traditional forest
dwellers (OTFDs)‖. It seeks to secure traditional rights over forest land and
community forest resources (CFRs), and establish democratic community-based
forest governance (Neema Pathak Broome, Shruti Ajit , 2017).
―The Forest Rights Act gives equal importance to both circumstantial and
oral evidence to settle a claim in a tribal community‘s favour, But more often than
not, the claims are turned down due to administrative reasons and wrong
interpretation of terms like ‗cultivation‘ and ‗possession‘ used in the Act‖ (The Wire,
2018).
P. Sainath pointed out in his book ―Everybody Loves a Good Drought‖ that
―It is crucial to understand about the landless agriculture and marginal framers who
makes up 85persent of India poor: they are not purchasers of food grain. Hikes in
food prices hit them very badly. Inflation is strongly linked to food prices. So its
impact on these sections is always worse‖ (Sainath, 1996).
Agrarian Crisis has led farmers to commit suicide in recent years. The major
reasons for agrarian distress are: incomplete agenda in land reforms, quantity and
quality of water, technology fatigue, access, adequacy and timeliness of institutional
credit, and opportunities for assured and remunerative marketing. Adverse
meteorological factors add to these problems. Farmers need to have assured access
and control over basic resources, which include land, water, bio resources, credit,
insurance, technology, knowledge management, and markets. The committee
suggested that ―Agriculture‖ be included in the Concurrent List of the Constitution.
Land Reforms: Land reforms are needed to address the basic issue of access
to land for both crops and live stock.
Credit and Insurance: extend the outreach of the formal credit system to reach
the most appropriate people; reduce the rate of crop loans interest into 4%; ensure
Moratorium on debt recovery; set up an Agriculture Risk Fund to provide relief to
farmers in the consequences of successive natural disasters. Provide Kisan Credit
Cards to women farmers and sustainable livelihood for the poor,
This study was undertaken with the objective of analyzing the coverage of
Kisan Long March news in both national and regional newspapers. The prominent
dailies namely, The Hindu, The New Indian Express, Malayala Manorama, and
Mathrubhumi were selected for this study.
Chapter II
REVIEW OF LITURATURE
For meeting the objectives of the study, it was important to go through the studies
already completed on this aspect. Relevant literature was reviewed. Here is a brief
description:
―Frames in the U.S. print media coverage of the Kashmir conflict‖ (2004), a
research conducted by Durga Ray discussed the frames used by the U.S print media
in their coverage of the Kashmir conflicts. The U.S. print media, represented by The
New York Times, The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times, have chosen to
highlight two aspects of the Kashmir conflict – religion and warfare. This study shows
that media coverage of the Kashmir conflict was crisis-oriented and reflected U.S.
concerns in the region. The conflict was described as violent Kashmiri separatist
movement, a frame that changed to one depicting it as ongoing violent conflict
between and Pakistan. Kashmiri were predominantly identified as armed militants
fighting for secession of Kashmir from India. Pakistan was consistently identified as a
country supporting the Kashmiri separatist movement with arms and training, and
later as a country itself participating in the conflict through its military. The United
States was consistently described as a country concerned with peace and security in
South Asia.
Framing Hillary Clinton: A Content Analysis of the New York Times News
Coverage of the 2000 New York Senate Election, a research paper conducted by
Amy Beth Busher (2006) This study used a combination of qualitative and
quantitative content analyses to examine how news articles written by the New York
Times portrayed Hillary Clinton during the 2000 New York Senate Election. The study
discovered four dominant frames -political activity, gender stereotype, horserace and
traditional first lady. The finding shows that Hillary Clinton received more coverage
based on her political activity. Hillary Clinton framed as the winner in the majority of
the New York Times news articles.
War on the Web: The Immediate News Framing of Gulf War II by Daniela V.
Dimitrova, Lynda Lee Kaid, Andrew Paul Williams, and Kaye D. Trammell examined
the immediate coverage of the 2003Iraq war on the front page of 246international
news Websites. The study reveals that most of the online news site provided
coverage and made Gulf War IInd their top story only hours after the war began.
According to this study the foreign news sites framed the war differently than U.S
website. Domestic news sites focused more heavily on the military conflict, media
self-coverage and human interest while the responsibility frame was more common
for international sites. Online news coverage in countries officially favour of the war
tended to portray it in more positive than in the countries against the war.
Unseen and unheard – how Dalits are represented in three Indian newspapers
by Joanna Wahlstedt (2012), the thesis focused on three Indian English newspapers:
Times of India, The Hindu and Indian Express, to examine how do journalists find
their reporting about Dalits? The study focused three theories development
journalism, the agenda setting theory and theory about minorities in media. The result
of the study reveal that Dalits are frequently mentioned in the three newspaper, but
the main subject is almost never Dalits and their situation in society. The most topics
were the election, rape against Dalits, crime and affirmative action. These subjects
often have a connection to sensation. The most quoted actors in the articles are the
elite and not Dalits. There is little space to caste violence, since most of these articles
are short.
Coverage of sedition charges against JNU students in The Hindu & Times of
India by Sobhika V and Sikha N. The study examined the coverage of JNU issue of
sedition by the prominent English national dailies The Hindu and The Times of India.
It also focused how the newspapers had framed the story through using framing
theories. The study shows that The Hindu has allotted more space to the JNU issue
than The Times of India. The caste frame, political frame, student‘s politics frame,
thematic frame and episodic frame has been used in the analysis of the JNU crisis.
The study ―Domestic Conflict or Global Terror? Framing the Mumbai Terror
Attacks in the U.S. Print Press‖ by Kamla Pande (2009), explored the coverage of the
2008 Mumbai terrorist attack in the U.S. print media. The frames and narratives are
examined through a content analysis of stories written about the attack in The New
York Times and The Washington Post. The analysis reveals that the war on terror
frame is actually the dominant meta-narrative within which conflict framing may
occurring this investigation into how the U.S. news press covered the Mumbai attack,
it was proposed that the nature and content of the coverage would depend on which
frame was used to convey the event to the American public.
METHODOLOGY
This chapter presents the objectives of the study, statement of the problem,
methodology, theoretical framework, sampling and operational definition of key terms.
To carry out a comparative content analysis of print media coverage of Kisan Long
March, in terms of number of stories and space appearing in the four newspapers -
The Hindu, The New Indian Express, Malayala Manorama and Mathrubhumi.
The purpose of this study is to analyze the coverage of agrarian crisis in four
newspapers namely The Hindu, The New Indian Express, Malayala Manorama and
Mathrubhumi.
Content analysis was found to be the most appropriate method to undertake this
study. The researcher conducted both quantitative and qualitative content analysis in
order to examine the research objectives. The aim of the study is to examine the
content coverage of Kisan Long March. Content analysis of the newspapers has been
done to examine the fact that how much coverage has been given to Kisan Long
March by newspapers during the Long March.
Both quantitative and qualitative content analysis is carried out to find out the
coverage of Kisan Long March on four newspapers, including two Malayalam and two
English dailies – The New Indian Express, The Hindu, Malayala Manorama and
Mathrubhumi.
The quantitative analysis of the study will give a clear idea of news stories of
Kisan Long March. The study had analyzed the total space allotted to the news items
in the newspapers, page wise categorization of stories, total space allocation to
cartoons and photographs, news bias of the selected newspapers, action statements
etc.
The qualitative content analysis will help to identify the bias shown by the
selected newspapers, while reporting the issue. Thematic analysis helps to identify
the frames used by The Hindu, The New Indian Express, Malayala Manorama and
Mathrubhumi in covering the farmers protest. Specific news bias analysis on each
frame help to identify which aspect of protest are specifically supported.
News report, photograph, cartoons, Action statement and headlines are taken as the
unit of content analysis.
3.4 Sampling
In this research, four newspapers are selected to observe the qualitative and
quantitative content analysis in regarding with the Kisan Long March,
Selected newspapers are The Hindu, The New Indian Express, Malayala Manorama
and Mathrubhumi. The study period was from March 5th 2018 to March 18th 2018.
The Hindu is an English language Indian daily newspaper published by Kasturi and
sons Ltd. It is the second largest newspaper in India by circulation after Time of India.
It always been noted for its fair and accurate reporting of events. In 1994, The Hindu
becomes the first newspaper to offer an online edition.
3.4.2 The New Indian Express
3.4.4 Mathrubhumi
Framing is based on the assumption that how a story is illustrated in news reports can
have an influence on how it is understood by audiences or readers. The theory was
propounded by Goffman. He pointed out that people interpret what is happening
around their world through their primary framework. Framing basically involves
salience and selection. To frame is to select various aspects of a perceived reality
and create them more salient in a communicating text, in such a way as to encourage
causal interpretation, a particular problem definition, moral evaluation, and treatment
recommendation for the item described.
Robert Entman (1993) point out that frames are manifested ―by the presence
or absence of certain keywords, stock phrases, stereotyped images, sources of
information, and sentences that provide thematically reinforcing clusters of facts or
judgments.‖A frame refers to the way media as gatekeepers organize and present the
ideas, topics and events they cover.
The All India Kisan Sabha (AIKS) was a major peasant movement formed by
Sahajanand Saraswati at the Lucknow session of the Indian National Congress in
1936.
Kisan Long March was a large protest march by farmers in Maharashtra, conducted
by the All Indian Kisan Sabha.
Agenda setting is a theory of mass communication that explain the way in which the
mass media interacts with and affects the public, it targets
3.6.4 Framing
Framing is a theory related to mass media. It is based on the assumption that how a
story is illustrated in news reports can have a influence on how it is understood by
audiences or readers.
News coverage is the coverage of news story and examined through the content
analysis that how much space was given in each newspaper for the issue and to what
extent newspapers reported the issue.
News bias is the bias of journalists and producers within the mass media in the
selection of events and stories that are published and how they are covered.
3.6.7 Prominence
Prominence is refers to the features which lend visibility to the articles. These include
edition lead, page lead, boxed use of bold type and use of pictures.
Volume of coverage is refers to the total space allocated to the farmers agitation in
column centimeters
This section deals with the difficulties and limitations that faced the researcher during
this study.
The present study examined only four news papers namely The Hindu, The
New Indian Express, Malayala Manorama and Mathrubhumi. Hence the
assumption from this study cannot be applied to the entire news papers in
India.
The time period for the study was limited to March 5th 2018 to March 18th
2018.
The study was limited to content analysis of newspapers; therefore, the
awareness of the news stories on the readers could not be analyzed.
Chapter IV
This chapter analysis the newspaper coverage of Kisan Long March by the four
selected dailies The Hindu, The New Indian Express, Mathrubhumi and Malayala
Manorama. Through this chapter the researcher has tries to explore how much
prominence has been given to the issue, how the selected newspaper frame the
Kisan Long March in terms of page positioning, tone and thematic content.
The quantitative analysis of the study will give a clear idea of news stories of Kisan
Long March. The study had analyzed the total space allotted to the news items in the
newspapers, page wise categorization of stories, total space allocation to cartoons
and photographs, news bias of the selected newspapers, action statements etc. The
quantitative content analysis will help to understand significance of the coverage in
detailed.
The following table discusses the number of stories that appeared in the selected
newspaper during the study period.
The study findings in Table 4.1.1 shows that Kisan Long March received very
little attention in selected newspapers. Mathrubhumi newspaper had a relatively
better coverage of the issue when compared to the other three newspapers.
Mathrubhumi newspaper published a total of 11 stories during the period. It includes
2 front page stories 2 editorial stories 7 inner page stories. Both The Hindu and The
New Indian Express covered 7 stories related to the issue. The Hindu published more
inner page news stories as compared to other three newspapers.
4
Front page stories
3 Editorial page stories
0
The Hindu The New Indian Malayala Mathrubhumi
Express Manorama
The finding indicates that the newspapers relegate the news of the farmers‘ protest
to the inner pages, hardly giving it minor importance. Agrarian crisis in India have
long remained less portrayal in the media. The findings pointed out that issues of
.social and economic importance that concern the masses are not the top priority for
mainstream media houses, which are increasingly driven by the need for advertising
revenue.
Space allocation is a major aspect for any newspaper. When a newspaper gives
space for an issue has a bigger impact in grasp the attention of the reader. Here
focuses on the newspaper coverage of the issue in a scientific way. How much space
has been allotted for the story and how the issue has been framed etc. are examined.
The table reveals the space allocation of the selected newspaper for reporting the
Kisan Long March.
The above table shows that The Hindu allotted a total space of 486.84 column cm for
the coverage of the long march. The New Indian Express allotted 497 column.cm
spaces for the story. Malayala Manorama had given 478.1 column.cm and
Mathrubhumi given 632.2column.cm for reporting the issue. Mathrubhumi has given
more space to the news coverage.
The Hindu which is known to cover socio-economic issues significantly did not
give much space to this news on its editorial page. The Hindu allotted only
67.column.cm for the issue. Through this data it gives clear evidence that how the
mainstream newspapers ignore the peasant issues and agrarian crisis by giving less
coverage. These findings suggest that agrarian crisis is not considered by newspaper
editors and owners as important enough to attract the readers.
No 1 - 1 -
Table 4.1.3 shows that The Hindu and Malayala Manorama published cartoons
whereas no cartoon was in The New Indian Express and Mathrubhumi.
The Hindu daily has allotted more space to cartoon as compared to Malayala
Manorama. The Hindu has given 48 column.cm for cartoon and Malayala Manorama
allotted 38.4 column.cm to cartoon.
4.1.4 Visual Representations
Single
0 0 0 0
Colour
Group Colour 3 2 4 3
The above table reflects the news stories covered with and without pictures in
selected newspapers. It shows that The Hindu gave more news with photographs as
compared to other selected newspapers. It can be clearly seen in the table that The
Hindu has given 8 photographs of the long march.
Single
Colour 0 0 0 0
Single
Black & White 0 0 0 22.5
Group
Colour 117 57 192.6 146.53
Total space of
167 172 331.6 254.93
photographs
According to the tabulated data the actual space given to the newspapers were
determined, therefore the total space given to the pictures related to Kisan Long
March in selected newspapers was 924.6 cm2 between the issues from March 5th,
2018 to March 18th, 2018. It clearly illustrate that pictures often enhance the
importance of the issue because it not only explain the reader about the importance
but also present the image which helps reader to make perception effectively.
The table indicates that The Hindu allotted a total space of 167 column cm for
the visual representation of the long march; The New Indian Express has given
172column cm, Malayala Manorama 331.6 column.cm and Mathrubhumi has given
254.93 column.cm of space to pictures that are related to the stories of Kisan Long
March. This is very interesting relationships found out that the Malayalam
newspapers have given greater space to picture than English newspapers
According to the analysis, most of the pictures are appeared in upper left and
right halves which also determine the importance of the issue. At the same time most
of the pictures relegated to the inner pages.
Headlines are another significant area of research. Headline plays a crucial role in
newspaper. It attracts the readers to read the news story. The font size of the
headlines will indicate the importance of the news story. The importance of the story
increases when the headline appeared in bold font. The research had gone through
the analysis of the headlines. The headline portrayed the incident rigorous.
The Hindu 2 2 0 2
Malayala 2 2 0 2
Manorama
Mathrubhumi 3 1 1 5
The Hindu has given 2 single lined bold headline of the news story. It also
gave 2 double lined, and 2 normal heading of the issue.
The New Indian Express has published 2 single lined bold headline of the
story of long march. It also gave 2 double lined, and 2 normal headlines of the issue.
The Single line headline mostly came in the front page of the newspaper. It also gave
bold headings in the editorial page and inner page.
The Malayala Manorama has given 2 single line bold headlines and 2 double
bold headlines to the news story of Kisan Long March.
The political party leaders, famous social activist, journalists and other prominent
personalities have delivered their opinions on Kisan Long March. The four selected
newspapers publish the action statements of the opinion holders.
In this section, long march related news stories are critically analyzed to identify the
bias shown by the selected newspapers, while reporting the farmers protest.
Thematic analysis helps to identify the frames used by The Hindu, The New Indian
Express, Malayala Manorama and Mathrubhumi in covering the farmers protest.
Specific news bias analysis on each frame help to identify which aspect of protest are
specifically supported.
News bias is common in newspapers and this bias makes a huge impact in the
selection of events and stories that are reported and in the way they are covered.
Newspapers always give news according to their agenda. The stories will be
presented according to the policy of the editorial board. Every newspaper will have a
particular point of view towards an issue. The four selected newspaper has shown
some sort of news bias while reporting the protest. Here the researcher evaluates
how the selected newspapers covered the issue, whether in its favour, neutral or
balanced.
A news paper published its views on current events – both local and national – on its
editorial page. This is where editorial; lettets to the editor, op-ed column and political
cartoon appear. Thus the editorial page is the most important page of a newspaper.
An editorial is an unsigned article that presents the newspapers opinion on an issue.
It reflects the point of view of the newspaper policy. The Hindu, The New Indian
Express, Malayala Manorama and Mathrubhumi deeply analyzed the Kisan Long
March in their editorial page.
The Hindu published the farmers protest through their editorial page. The lead
of the editorial discussed about the way of protest, the manner in which they
conducted themselves without distracting of other citizen and refrain from aggressive
slogans. The editorial page makes little effort to explain the issues of the protesting
farmers. It focused how people of Mumbai welcomed farmers with water, food items,
medical aids and footwear.
On the other hand The New Indian Express strongly supported the long march
conducted All India Kisan Sabha in editorial. The New Indian Express questioned the
ignorance of government towards agrarian crisis. Through their editorial stated that
there is difference between Kisan Long March and other farmer protest that
conducted in last few months. It pointed out that the structural demand of the Kisan
Long March is that the implementation of Forest Right Act. It reveals that this problem
is something that is specific to Adivasee farmers, since this law was passed in 2006
to bring relief to forest and tribal communities, but whose rights over such land are
not officially recognized. The editorial pages of The New Indian Express discussed
the farmers protest and agrarian crisis in detailed manner.
The Hindu, which is known to cover socio-economic issues prominently, gives little
space to this news on its front page. That went to reports about the demands of
farmers and its front page report on March 13 2018 talked about that The
Maharashtra government has agreed to the most of the demands of the protesters
and has given its approval in letter.
The New Indian Express gave more prominence to the issue of farmers‘
distress. The front page of the newspaper carried the story with the title ‗Sea of
farmers in Mumbai‘ on March 13 2018. The newspaper had a front-page lead report
related to the long march that takes account of voices of 10 farmers who have
participated in the protest.
The all newspapers relegate the news of the farmers‘ protest to the inner pages. On
March 13, 2018 the inner page of The Hindu reports that how the Mumbai citizens
welcomed farmers with water, food and medical aids and the lead reports on the
Nation page focus on the political background of the Kisan Long March and reports
how the Shiva Sena which is a partner in the government of Maharashtra, The
Nationalist Congress Party, The Congress, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) and
Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) have supported the march.
The New Indian Express report the issue in inner page on 13 March 2018 with
the headline ―New edge to agrarian distress: Why demands are more than loan
waiver‖ explains how a large section of farmers are not seeking a loan waiver, but the
immediate implementation of the Forest Rights Act, 2006. Malayala Manorama
reports focus on the crowds of protest and their demands and politics around the
march.
The Kisan Long March captured the nation‘s attention to the agrarian crisis.
The newspaper reports contributed to it. It reported in favour of the government and
the farmers, sometimes it published equally balanced reports. The below tables show
that news bias of the selected news papers.
Table 4.2.1 News bias of the Newspapers
Exclusively in favour of
the government 0 0 0 0
Neutral or
4 1 3 4
equally balanced
Exclusively in favour of
3 6 3 7
the Kisan
Data in table 4.8 shows the news bias of selected newspapers. The Hindu reports
3news stories in favour of the farmers and while it published 4 news stories in neutral.
The New Indian Express reported majority of the news stories in favour of the long
march and one news item published in neutral. Malayala Manorama gave 3 news
stories in favour of the long march, while they also published 3 stories in neutral. Like
The New Indian Express, Mathrubhumi daily also published majority of their news
items in favour of the long march. And two news stories reported in neutral. The
above tabulated data indicate that majority of the news items published in favour of
the Kisan Long March.
The selected newspapers gave most of the space to other news reports as
compared to the coverage of Kisan Long March.
The Malayalam newspaper Mathrubhumi daily published more stories
regarding to the issue.
The coverage of Kisan Long March on the front page of the selected
newspapers was negligible. Very few news were recorded on the first page of
the newspapers regarding to the issue.
The newspapers relegate the news of the farmers‘ protest to the inner pages,
hardly giving it minor importance.
Malayala Manorama has given much prominence to the issue by giving a
major space to the news in front page while compared to other three
newspapers. It allotted 150 column cm for front page news stories.
The news area covered on the editorial pages in four newspapers was very
less.
The Hindu which is known to cover socio-economic issues significantly did not
give much space to this news on its editorial page. The Hindu allotted only
67.column.cm for the issue.
Only The Hindu and Malayala Manorama published cartoons whereas no
cartoon was in The New Indian Express and Mathrubhumi. The Hindu has
given 48 column.cm spaces for cartoon and Malayala Manorama allotted 38.4
column.cm spaces to cartoon.
The total space given to the pictures related to Kisan Long March in selected
newspapers was 924.6 cm.
The Malayalam newspapers have given greater space to picture than English
newspapers.
The New Indian Express has published 2 single lined bold headline of the
story of long march. It also gave 2 double lined, and 2 normal headlines of the
issue. The Single line headline mostly came in the front page of the
newspaper. It also gave bold headings in the editorial page and inner page.
The study focused on the coverage given to news reports on Kisan Long March by
the four dailies – The Hindu, The New Indian Express, Malayala Manorama and
Mathrubhumi.
The Kisan Long March led by All India Kisan Sabha (AIKS) in Maharashtra
captured the nation‘s attention to the agrarian crisis in rural Maharashtra and forced
the government to agree most of the demands raised by them. Their demands
included Farm loan waiver, Remunerative prices, Implementation of the
Swaminathan Commission‘s recommendations, stringent implementation of the
Forest Rights Act (FRA), Increase in various pension schemes for poor farmers and
agricultural workers,
5.1 Discussion
The media often played an essential role in shaping the public opinion. The public
response towards an issue is highly influenced by the news spread through the media
especially newspapers. People find more comfort in gathering news from
newspapers. Therefore, the newspapers should publish news based on the truth, not
from their political ideology. It will create ambiguity among the public and they will
mould their perspective regarding the newspaper content. The study had focused on
the coverage of Kisan Long March by the prominent dailies The Hindu, The New
Indian Express, Malayala Manorama and Mathrubhumi.
Kisan Long March received very little attention in selected newspapers. Most
of the reports related to farmers‘ agitation relegate to the inner pages.
Through this research gives clear evidence that how the mainstream
newspapers ignore the peasant issues and agrarian crisis by giving less coverage.
These findings suggest that agrarian crisis is not considered by newspaper editors
and owners as important enough to attract the readers. Agrarian crisis in India have
long remained less portrayal in the media. The study pointed out that issues of .social
and economic importance that concern the masses are not the top priority for
mainstream media houses. Hence the study has examined all the aspects of the
Kisan March. It has discussed the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the content.
Most of the report discussed about the political background of the protest,
mobilization of the march, and the way of protest and farmers demand rather than
focusing actual problem of farmers. The results of the research also agree with a
study of Centre for Media Studies which discovered that Rural and agricultural sector
in India have long remained less portrayal in the media.
The findings of the research also agree with the agenda setting theory by
McCombs and Dr. Donald Shaw which states that the news plays an integral part in
the shaping of political realities. The amount of time spent on an issue and the
information relayed in a news story, along with the story's position, determines how
much a reader learns and the amount of importance placed on the issue.
The lack of in depth coverage around the economic conditions and policies
that underlie the farmers‘ protests created a distorted perception of the problem.
Readers were given little context for the farmers‘ struggle and were kept uninformed
about their own stake in the agrarian crisis.
5.2 Conclusion
The study entitled with ―A comparative content analysis of print media coverage of
Kisan Long March in four dailies: The Hindu, The New Indian Express, Malayala
Manorama and Mathrubhumi‖ focused on the coverage of Kisan Long March and
analyzed how the selected newspapers cover the issue in terms of page positioning,
tone and thematic content.
The study concluded by findings that the selected newspapers gave little
attention to the coverage of Kisan Long March. The Malayalam newspaper
Mathrubhumi daily published more stories regarding to the issue. The coverage of
Kisan Long March on the front page of the selected newspapers was negligible. Very
few news were recorded on the first page of the newspapers regarding to the issue.
The newspapers relegate the news of the farmers‘ protest to the inner pages, hardly
giving it minor importance. Malayala Manorama has given much prominence to the
issue by giving a major space to the news in front page while compared to other three
newspapers. It allotted 150 column cm for front page news stories. The news area
covered on the editorial pages in four newspapers was very less.
5.3 Recommendations
1. Arul Aram, G.C. Prem Nivas and G.P. Ramya. (2015). Newspaper framing of
Kudankulam Nuclear Plant in Tamil Nadu .
5. Anushka Shah, Zeenab Aneez. (2017). How the Indian News Covered the
2017 Farmer Protests: A Quantitative Study. Media cloud .
11. Daniela V. Dimitrova, L. L. (2003). War on the Web: The Immediate News
Framing of Gulf War II .
14. Dhawale, A. (2018). Long March: A brilliant Victory. In A. Dhawale, the kisAn
long MArch .
15. Dr. Usharani Narayana, Dr. Suresh Kumar. (2009). Content Analysis of
Agricultural News Coverage in Leading Language Dailies of India, A study of
Kannada Language dailies of Karnataka state.
17. I, H. (2015). News Framing on Indo-Pak Conflicts in the News (Pakistan) and
Times of India: War and Peace Journalism Perspective.
22. Neema Pathak Broome, Shruti Ajit . (2017). Promise and Performance: Ten
Years of the Forest Rights Act in Maharashtra. OXFAM - India .
23. Padre S, Tripp R. (2003). Reforming farm journalism: The experience of Adike
Parthrike in India Agricultural Research and Extension Network (AGREN).
London: Overseas Development Institute.
24. Pande, K. (2009). Domestic Conflict or Global Terror? Framing the Mumbai
Terror Attacks in the U.S. Print Press .
25. Ray, D. (2004). Frames in the U.S. print media coverage of the Kashmir
conflict.
27. Sainath, P. (1996). Everybody Loves a Good Drought. New Delhi: Penguin
Books.
29. Wahlstedt, J. (2012). Unseen and unheard – how Dalits are represented in
three Indian newspapers.