Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
FILED
1st JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
Santa Fe County
STATE OF NEW MEXICO 7/25/2019 2:43 PM
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT STEPHEN T. PACHECO
COUNTY OF SANTA FE CLERK OF THE COURT
Jennifer Romero
Petitioners,
v. No. _________________
Respondent.
COME NOW Petitioners Harold Meyers, Laura Sias, and Duke Rodriguez, by counsel
Egolf + Ferlic + Harwood, LLC (Brian Egolf and Kristina Caffrey, appearing) and petition this
Court for an alternative writ of mandamus, pursuant to NMSA 1978 § 44-2-4, to compel the
Secretary of the New Mexico Department of Health and the Department of Health Medical
Cannabis Program Manager to immediately issue registry identification cards to Harold Meyers,
Laura Sias, and Duke Rodriguez, because they are qualified patients pursuant to statutory
definitions. As of the date of this filing, the Department of Health’s Medical Cannabis Program
has refused to issue registry identification cards to eligible qualified patients, and in so doing it
incorporated herein fully by reference, and will also be submitted directly to the Court.
1. Harold Meyers is a resident of Dalhart, Texas who suffers from obstructive sleep
4. Kenny Vigil is a state officers of the New Mexico Department of Health, which
6. The Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act (hereinafter “the Act”) legalized the
use and production of medical cannabis in New Mexico in 2007. See N.M.S.A. 1978 § 26-2B-1
et seq.
7. “The purpose of the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act is to allow the
beneficial use of medical cannabis in a regulated system for alleviating symptoms caused by
debilitating medical conditions and their medical treatments.” NMSA 1978, § 26-2B-2 (2007).
8. The Act provides for the licensure of patients, health care providers, caregivers,
cannabis manufacturers, and manufacturers of cannabis products by the MCP. NMSA 1978, §
26-2B-3 (2019).
9. The Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act was amended in 2019. The law
amending the Act, Laws 2019, Chapter 247, is attached here as Exhibit 2. The current text
available from the New Mexico Compilation Commission enacting and evidencing the
10. The changes to the Act took effect on June 14, 2019.
2
11. The Act charges the Department of Health (hereinafter “DOH”) with
administering the medical cannabis system in New Mexico. See N.M.S.A. 1978 § 26-2B-7
12. DOH has created within itself the Medical Cannabis Program.
13. Kenny Vigil is the Program Manager of the Medical Cannabis Program.
14. The Act is premised upon certain categories of people and business being
qualified patient’s primary caregiver shall not be subject to arrest, prosecution or penalty in any
manner for the possession of or the medical use of cannabis if the quantity of cannabis does not
“practitioner shall not be subject to arrest or prosecution, penalized in any manner or denied any
right or privilege for recommending the medical use of cannabis or providing written
certification for the medical use of cannabis pursuant to the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use
Act.”
17. Additionally, N.M.S.A. 1978 § 26-2B-4(G) (2019) states that a licensed producer,
manufacturer, or testing facility “shall not be subject to arrest, prosecution or penalty, in any
medical cannabis, a “qualified patient” must first obtain a “registry identification card,” which is
3
issued by the DOH Medical Cannabis Program. See N.M.S.A. 1978 §26-2B-3(V) and (X) and
§26-2B-7(B).
diagnosed by a practitioner as having a debilitating medical condition and has received written
20. The “written certification” comes from a medical practitioner. The definition of
“written certification” within the Act is “a statement made on a department-approved form and
signed by a patient’s practitioner that indicates, in the practitioner’s professional opinion, that the
patient has a debilitating medical condition and the practitioner believes that the potential health
benefits of the medical use of cannabis would likely outweigh the health risks for the patient.”
21. The Act also contains a definition of “practitioner,” which is “a person licensed in
New Mexico to prescribe and administer drugs that are subject to the Controlled Substances
22. The Compassionate Use Act includes a list of medical conditions that are
considered to be a “debilitating medical condition,” and having one of those conditions will
make an individual eligible to be qualified to legally purchase and use medical cannabis in New
Mexico. Rather, the Act lists several specific medical conditions that may make an individual
eligible to be qualified to legally purchase and use medical cannabis in New Mexico. Those
23. A registry identification card issued allows a qualified patient to legally purchase
cannabis from a licensed producer and allows the qualified patient to use and transport cannabis
4
24. The registry identification is issued by the Department of Health. N.M.S.A. 1978
§26-2B-3(X).
25. The Act specifically states when and under what conditions DOH must issue a
department shall issue registry identification cards to a patient and to the primary caregiver for
that patient, if any, who submit the following, in accordance with the department's rules: (1)
a written certification; (2) the name, address and date of birth of the patient; (3) the name,
address and telephone number of the patient's practitioner; and (4) the name, address and date of
26. The Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act was amended in 2019 with the stated
purpose of “to expand eligibility…and to establish new qualifying medical conditions, civil
protections, and interstate and tribal reciprocity.” Senate 406, as passed and signed and enrolled
27. The 2019 amendments to the Act changed the definition of “qualified patient.”
28. Prior to the 2019 amendments to the Act, the definition of qualified patient was “a
resident of New Mexico who has been diagnosed by a practitioner as having a debilitating
medical condition and has received written certification and a registry identification card”
(emphasis added). See Senate Bill 406, Page 12, attached hereto as Exhibit 2.
29. The 2019 amendments changed the definition of qualified patient to “a person
who has been diagnosed by a practitioner as having a debilitating medical condition and has
received written certification and a registry identification card...” (emphasis added). N.M.S.A.
5
30. By making this change to the law, the Legislature removed the requirement that
31. The issue presented by this petition for writ of mandamus is whether the
Department must issue registry identification cards to persons not residents of New Mexico who
32. The Department of Health’s issuance of registry identification cards for use,
33. The Department of Health’s issuance of registry identification cards for use,
34. This is apparent from both the words of the statute and from prior caselaw.
35. “Mandamus lies to compel the performance of a ministerial act or duty that is
clear and indisputable.” New Energy Econ., Inc. v. Martinez, 2011–NMSC–006, ¶ 10, 149 N.M.
36. “A ministerial act is an act which an officer performs under a given state of facts,
exercise of his own judgment upon the propriety of the act being done.” Id. ¶ 10
37. N.M.S.A. 1978 §26-2B-7(B) states, “The department shall issue registry
identification cards to a patient and to the primary caregiver for that patient, if any, who submit
the following, in accordance with the department’s rules: (1) a written certification; (2) the name,
address and date of birth of the patient; (3) the name, address and telephone number of the
patient’s practitioner; and (4) the name, address and date of birth of the patient’s primary
6
38. The word “shall” indicates a ministerial action without the availability of
discretion.
39. N.M.S.A. 1978 §26-2B-7(C) (2019) further states, “The department shall verify
and shall approve or deny an application within thirty days of receipt. The department may
deny an application only if the applicant did not provide the information required
40. The Uniform Statute and Rule Construction Act governs how certain words and
41. N.M.S.A. 1978 § 12-2A-4(A) states that the words “shall” and “must” “express a
42. “One of the canons of statutory construction states that the words ‘shall’ and
‘will’ are mandatory and ‘may’ is permissive or directory.” Montano v. Los Alamos County,
1996-NMCA-108, ¶ 5.
43. Because N.M.S.A. 1978 §26-2B-7(B) states DOH “shall issue registry
identification cards,” the Department’s issuance of the cards is a mandatory duty that is clear,
44. Furthermore, NMSA 1978, §26-2B-7(B) describes the “given state of facts” under
45. NMSA 1978, § 26-2B-7(B) lists four, and only four, pieces of information that are
7
46. Additionally, NMSA 1978, § 26-2B-7(C) states, “The department may deny an
application only if the applicant did not provide the information required pursuant to
Subsection B of this section or if the department determines that the information provided
is false,” which precludes the Department of Health from requiring any other pieces of
information other than the four pieces listed in §26-2B-7(B) (emphasis added).
47. While NMSA 1978, §26-2B-7(B) contains the phrase “who submit the following,
in accordance with Department rules,” this phrase refers merely to the manner of submission of
the four listed pieces of information, rather than the substance of the information required.
48. Thus, the Department can issue rules requiring the use of a form or requiring that
submissions be typed, or requiring the usage of blue ink rather than black ink, or specifying the
49. “In accordance with Department rules” does not work to enlarge the Department’s
discretionary power over the issuance of registry identification facts; rather, it only works to
recognize the Department’s ability to specify the manner in which patients should submit
50. NMSA 1978, §26-2B-7(C) emphasizes that the Department does not have
discretion regarding what pieces of information are necessary to receive a registry identification
card: “The department may deny an application only if the applicant did not provide the
information required pursuant to Subsection B of this section or if the department determines that
51. In addition to the statutory language being obviously mandatory and ministerial,
there is legal precedent regarding DOH’s lack of discretion over registry identification cards.
8
52. Case D-101-CV-2014-00140, Carola Kieve v. New Mexico Department of Health,
53. The Court’s final order in that case, which is attached here as Exhibit 3, states “As
part of an initial application for a patient card, the Department may require from patients and
their practitioners no more information that what is included in NMSA 1978 § 26-2B-3(H)” and
patient’s application, but the Department may not require that the ‘written certification’ contain
any information or attestation that is not expressly required by the Act” (Order, page 3).
54. The Kieve case reinforces that DOH may not add requirements beyond what is in
55. As explained further below, DOH currently requires prospective qualified patients
to submit a copy of a New Mexico driver’s license, in order to prove New Mexico residency.
56. The current application form used by DOH is attached here as Exhibit 4. It
requires patients applicants to submit a “clear copy of your current New Mexico Driver’s
57. DOH’s requirement of a copy of a New Mexico driver’s license is, in and of
58. The statute does not require submission of a driver’s license from anyone,
resident or not.
59. The requirement of a driver’s license is directly contrary to statute and to the
Kieve ruling.
60. The Court must order Respondents to cease requiring driver’s licenses and to
9
Persons Not New Mexico Residents Are Eligible to Be Qualified Patients and Must
Receive Registry Identification Cards
61. The plain language of the 2019 Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act indicates
that non-New Mexico-residents may obtain registry identification cards and participate in the
62. The plain language of the 2019 Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act indicates
that DOH must issue a registry identification card to an out-of-state resident who otherwise
63. “When interpreting a statute, a court’s primary goal is to facilitate and promote
the Legislature’s purpose.” Gandydancer, LLC v. Rock Hosue CGM, LLC, 2018-NMCA-064, ¶
7.”
64. “In discerning that purpose, ‘we look first to the plain language of the statute,
giving the words their ordinary meaning, unless the Legislature indicates a different one was
65. In another mandamus case, the Supreme Court stated, “A statute must be read and
given effect as it is written by the Legislature, not as the court may think it should be or would
have been written if the Legislature had envisaged all the problems and complications which
might arise…Courts must take the act as they find it and construe it according to the plain
meaning of the language employed.” Perea v. Baca, 1980-NMSC-079, ¶ 22, 94 N.M. 624.
66. The plain language of the current definition of qualified patient indicates that the
67. The language is “a person who has been diagnosed by a practitioner as having a
debilitating medical condition and has received written certification and a registry identification
10
68. A “person” is simply that: a human being, regardless of whether they are a New
69. Additionally, the word “person” replaces “New Mexico resident,” Which was
found in the law prior to the 2019 changes to the law. The replacement is a clear sign of
legislative intent to widen the reach of eligibility for the New Mexico medical cannabis program.
70. DOH has informally indicated, since the passage of the 2019 amendments, that
the change from “resident of New Mexico” to “person” was only done to accommodate the
72. The 2019 amendments added a new definition of “reciprocal participant” to the
Act, which is “an individual who holds proof of authorization to participate in the medical
cannabis program of another state of the United States, the District of Columbia, a territory or
commonwealth of the United States or a New Mexico Indian nation, tribe or pueblo.”
73. The Act does not require DOH to promulgate rules regarding reciprocal
participants until 2020: “By March 1, 2020, the secretary of health shall adopt and promulgate
rules relating to medical cannabis program reciprocity. The department may identify
requirements for the granting of reciprocity, including provisions limiting the period of time in
which a reciprocal participant may participate in the medical cannabis program.” N.M.S.A. 1978
§ 26-2B-7(I).
74. While DOH may wish to believe that reciprocal participants are a mere sub-set of
qualified patients, there is ample evidence from the statute indicating that “reciprocal
participants” are an entirely different category of card-holders separate and apart from “qualified
patients.”
11
75. First, the definition of “registry identification card” at NMSA 1978, § 26-2B-3(X)
says it is a card issued to a “qualified patient” or “primary caregiver,” but not to a reciprocal
participant.
76. Second, NMSA 1978, § 26-2B-4, the section of the Act exempting MCP
participants from criminal penalties for their participation in cannabis-related activities contains
one exemption from prosecution for “qualified patients” and another separate exemption for
“reciprocal participants.” Thus, reciprocal participants and “qualified patients” are listed
separately as separate categories of eligible users by the Act itself. If reciprocal participants
were merely a subset of qualified patients, there would be no need to grant them separate explicit
exemptions.
medical cannabis, while reciprocal participants are allowed to possess “not more than the limit
identified by department rule” under § 26-2B-4(C) (stating that “a qualified patient or primary
caregiver [may purchase] not more than an adequate supply from a lawful source,” while a
“reciprocal participant [may] purchas[e] or obtain[] not more than the limit identified by
department rule”).
78. Again, if reciprocal participants were merely a subset of qualified patients, there
would be no need to set different purchase limitations for the two different classes.
79. Fourth, the Medical Advisory Board of the Medical Cannabis Program is charged
with recommending “quantities of cannabis that are necessary to constitute an adequate supply
for qualified patients and primary caregivers,” and also with recommending “quantities of
cannabis that a reciprocal participant may obtain and possess.” N.M.S.A. 1978 § 26-2B-6.
12
80. This again demonstrates that “qualified patients” is not simply an umbrella term
that incorporates “reciprocal participants,” because qualified patients are subject to different
81. Fifth, reciprocal participants “shall not be required to comply with the registry
82. The definition of “qualified patient” is “a person who has been diagnosed by a
practitioner as having a debilitating medical condition and has received written certification and
83. A qualified patient has received a registry identification card, but reciprocal
participants do not receive registry identification cards. Therefore, a reciprocal participant is not
a qualified patient.
84. Therefore, the two classes are entirely different, and the definition of “qualified
Mexico resident qualified patient is that a reciprocal participant must be a resident of a state that
86. If a person lives in a state that does not allow medical cannabis, or does not allow
it for that person’s particular condition, that person cannot be a “reciprocal participant.”
87. Sixth, the stated purpose of the 2019 amendments was to “expand eligibility…and
to establish new qualifying medical conditions, civil protections, and interstate and tribal
reciprocity,” indicating that expanded access (expanding the definition of qualified patient) and
13
88. The plain language of the definition of “qualified patient,” together with the larger
structure of the statute, includes New Mexico residents and non-New Mexico residents.
89. Further revealing the intent to allow non-residents to participate in the Medical
Cannabis Program is the requirement that patients must receive written certifications from
in New Mexico to prescribe and administer drugs that are subject to the Controlled Substances
90. The 2019 amendments to the Act do not obviate the requirement that a qualified
91. Therefore, a non-New Mexico resident must still receive a certification from a
medical practitioner licensed in New Mexico in order to receive a registry identification card.
92. Additionally, the 2019 amendments to the Compassionate Use Act included a
provision for the creation of “cannabis consumption areas.” These “cannabis consumption
areas” are defined as “an area within a licensed premises approved by the department where
cannabis may be consumed that complies with rule as established by the department.” N.M.S.A.
1978 §26-2B-3(C) 2019; see Exhibit 2, statutory amendments, at pages 7 and 28.
93. There are many conceivable classes of non-New Mexico residents who may wish
94. Those classes include, but are not limited to, out-of-state residents receiving
medical treatment in New Mexico and staying here for an extended period, but not long enough
to qualify as a resident; out-of-state residents who have second homes in New Mexico and do not
spend enough time in New Mexico to qualify as a resident; out-of-state residents who regularly
visit relatives, friends, or business interests in New Mexico and wish to maintain continuity of
14
cannabis ingestion during their visits; out-of-state residents contemplating or completing a move
to New Mexico who have not yet established residency; out-of-state residents who wish to come
to New Mexico to determine if and how medical cannabis helps their debilitating medical
conditions; a college student attending an institute of higher learning in New Mexico who will
not qualify as a New Mexico resident during their college attendance; a visiting or interning
scientist at one of New Mexico’s scientific laboratories who will not stay long enough to
occurred and still occurs in other states and U.S. territories. Prior to 2016, Oregon statute stated
that cannabis authorization cards were to be issued to “persons who meet the requirements” (see
Opinion of Oregon Attorney General, June 14, 2010, attached here as Exhibit 5). The Oregon
Attorney General stated in an opinion that the Oregon medical cannabis statute “contains no
96. The Oregon Attorney General opinion also discussed the fact that Oregon still
required an Oregon medical practitioner to make a certification for a patient. The Oregon
Attorney General commented that physicians have reciprocity in licensing, that there need not be
a long-term relationship between an Oregon physician and a prospective patient, and that the
difficulty a nonresident might encounter in finding an Oregon physician was not an impediment
97. California law also currently does not have a residency requirement. Under CA
Health & Safety Code Section 11362.712, a “qualified patient” must possess a “physician’s
recommendation” to access medical cannabis at reduced prices (California also has legalized
recreational cannabis, but medical cannabis can be purchased without sales tax). The definition
15
of “qualified patient” is “ a person who is entitled to the protections of Section 11362.5, but who
does not have an identification card issued pursuant to this article.” CA Health & Safety Code
Section 11362.7.
One of the questions is “Can I use cannabis,” with the answer stating, “You can legally use
cannabis if you are 21 or older. You can also use cannabis if you are 18 or older and have a
identification card.”1
99. The United States Virgin Islands explicitly has a definition for and a category for
“Nonresident in-patient cardholder.” See V.I. St. Title 19, Section 776.
100. The Act clearly allows non-New Mexico residents to become qualified patients
101. The Act does not allow non-New Mexico residents to transport cannabis across
state lines.
102. Any non-New Mexico resident who becomes a qualified patient does so with the
understanding that their use of cannabis is still subject to other laws, including laws prohibiting
103. The Petitioners in this case do not advocate for interstate transportation of
cannabis, and they do not argue that the Act makes such interstate transportation legal.
1
California recently overhauled its cannabis laws. Now, registry identification cards are optional and governed by
counties. Many counties do require proof of residency to issue the cards, but a person does not need a card to
purchase medical cannabis; the person needs only the physician recommendation.
16
104. Out-of-state residents who apply for registry identification cards in New Mexico
may and should be educated regarding the legal consequences of transporting cannabis into or
105. The requirements for issuance of a medical cannabis registry identification care
from the New Mexico Department of Health Medical Cannabis Program are clear.
106. First, the applicant must be a “person.” N.M.S.A. 1978 §26-2B-3(V) (2019).
107. The applicant person must have one of the debilitating medical conditions listed at
form and signed by” a medical practitioner “licensed in New Mexico to prescribe and administer
drugs that are subject to the Controlled Substances Act” “that indicates, in the practitioner’s
professional opinion, that the patient has a debilitating medical condition and the practitioner
believes that the potential health benefits of the medical use of cannabis would likely outweigh
the health risks for the patient.” N.M.S.A. 1978 §26-2B-3(BB) and §26-2B-3(S) (2019).
109. The applicant person must submit the written certification to the Department of
Health along with the name, address and date of birth of the patient and the name, address and
112. Mr. Rodriguez owns a home in New Mexico, but he does not spend the requisite
17
113. Mr. Rodriguez is a principle of several businesses in New Mexico and comes to
114. Mr. Rodriguez also has immediate family members in New Mexico, and he
115. Mr. Rodriguez does not wish to transport cannabis across the border between
116. However, Mr. Rodriguez wishes to maintain his regimen of cannabis medication
117. Mr. Rodriguez intends to consume cannabis at his home in New Mexico when he
practitioner.
119. Mr. Rodriguez submitted the written certification to DOH on the form prescribed
by DOH, along with the names and addresses of him/herself and the practitioner who issued the
certification.
120. DOH issued a denial letter. The denial letter is attached here as Exhibit 6.
121. The reasons DOH gave for the denial were “ID you sent was from outside New
Mexico,” and “it does not contain a New Mexico address or New Mexico County of Residence.”
124. Dalhart, Texas is just over the state line from Clayton, New Mexico.
18
125. Mr. Meyers owns and operates several small business located in New Mexico,
including a retail liquor store and a check-cashing store. Meyers also leases and operates several
126. Mr. Meyers spends approximately three days per week in New Mexico, and does
not qualify as a “resident” of New Mexico, nor does he have a New Mexico driver’s license.
127. Mr. Meyers intends to travel to New Mexico from Dalhart, purchase medical
practitioner.
129. Mr. Meyers submitted the written certification to DOH on the form prescribed by
DOH, along with the names and addresses of him/herself and the practitioner who issued the
certification.
130. DOH issued a denial letter. The denial letter is attached here as Exhibit 7.
131. The basis for DOH’s denial was lack of a New Mexico driver’s license or ID card.
134. Ms. Sias’s brother and best friend both live in Las Cruces New Mexico, and she
135. Ms. Sias would like to obtain medical cannabis to alleviate the symptoms of her
136. Ms. Sias intends to travel to Las Cruces from El Paso, purchase medical cannabis
19
137. Ms. Sias has considered moving to New Mexico in order to obtain medical
cannabis lawfully, but her partner works in El Paso, and they cannot make the move to New
Mexico.
practitioner.
139. Ms. Sias submitted the written certification to DOH on the form prescribed by
DOH, along with the names and addresses of herself and the practitioner who issued the
certification.
140. DOH issued a denial letter. The denial letter is attached here as Exhibit 9.
141. The reasons DOH gave for the denial were “ID you sent was from outside New
Mexico,” and “it does not contain a New Mexico address or New Mexico County of Residence.”
142. All of these Petitioners met the qualifications described above at Paragraphs 106
143. “Mandamus lies to compel the performance of a ministerial act or duty that is
clear and indisputable.” New Energy Econ., Inc. v. Martinez, 2011–NMSC–006, ¶ 10, 149 N.M.
144. “A ministerial act is an act which an officer performs under a given state of facts,
exercise of his own judgment upon the propriety of the act being done.” Id. ¶ 10
145. Kenny Vigil owes a ministerial duty to issue medical cannabis registry
identification cards to any person—whether a resident of New Mexico or not—who submits the
20
146. Petitioners all submitted registry identification card applications to the
Department of Health that met the statutory criteria for issuance of a card.
147. As such, Kenny Vigil has a ministerial duty to Petitioners to issue the registry
identification cards.
149. The issuance of registry identification cards are acts which Defendants perform
under a given state of facts, in a prescribed manner, in obedience to a mandate of legal authority,
and without regard to the exercise of their own judgment upon the propriety of the particular
150. The “given state of facts” here is 1) being a person; 2) the person having one of
the debilitating medical conditions listed in statute; 3) the person obtaining “a statement made on
a department-approved form and signed by” a medical practitioner “licensed in New Mexico to
prescribe and administer drugs that are subject to the Controlled Substances Act” “that indicates,
in the practitioner’s professional opinion, that the patient has a debilitating medical condition and
the practitioner believes that the potential health benefits of the medical use of cannabis would
likely outweigh the health risks for the patient; and 4) the person submitting the written
certification to the Department of Health along with the name, address and date of birth of the
patient and the name, address and telephone number of the patient’s practitioner.
151. The prescribed manner here is the person’s submission of this information on the
DOH-prescribed form.
21
153. The lack of DOH’s power to exercise its judgment in determining whether to
issue a registry identification card is shown by the lack of any such delegation of power in the
154. Mandamus will issue if there is no “plain, speedy and adequate remedy in the
156. Petitioners do not have a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary
course of law.
Application.
158. Issue a writ of mandamus requiring that Mr. Vigil issue a registry identification
card to the Petitioners and any other person, whether a New Mexico resident or not, who 1) has
one of the debilitating medical conditions listed in statute; 2) has obtained “a statement made on
a department-approved form and signed by” a medical practitioner “licensed in New Mexico to
prescribe and administer drugs that are subject to the Controlled Substances Act” “that indicates,
in the practitioner’s professional opinion, that the patient has a debilitating medical condition and
the practitioner believes that the potential health benefits of the medical use of cannabis would
likely outweigh the health risks for the patient;” and 3) has submitted that statement to the
Department of Health along with the name, address and date of birth of the patient and the name,
22
B. Award Petitioners their damages, costs, and fees pursuant to NMSA § 44-2-12
and 44-6-11.
D. Award any such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.
Respectfully submitted,
EGOLF + FERLIC +
MARTINEZ + HARWOOD, LLC
23
VERIFICATION
I have read the foregoing Petition for Writ of Mandamus and swear that the foregoing is
!L/@F
Harold Meyers
~~
Notary Public
My Commission expires:
Exhibit 1
v. No. _________________
Respondent.
TO: Kenny Vigil, Program Manager of Department of Health Medical Cannabis Program
Mexico’s Medical Cannabis and become “qualified patients;” Petitioners meet the statutory
qualifications for qualified patients pursuant to the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act.
2. Petitioners have petitioned this Court for an alternative writ of mandamus. The
Petition is attached hereto as Exhibit A. All allegations found in the Petition that are not
3. The Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act (hereinafter “the Act”) legalized the
use and production of medical cannabis in New Mexico in 2007. See N.M.S.A. 1978 § 26-2B-1
et seq.
4. “The purpose of the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act is to allow the
beneficial use of medical cannabis in a regulated system for alleviating symptoms caused by
debilitating medical conditions and their medical treatments.” NMSA 1978, § 26-2B-2 (2007).
1
5. The Act provides for the licensure of patients, health care providers, caregivers,
cannabis manufacturers, and manufacturers of cannabis products by the MCP. NMSA 1978, §
26-2B-3 (2019).
6. The Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act was amended in 2019.
administering the medical cannabis system in New Mexico. See N.M.S.A. 1978 § 26-2B-7
10. Kenny Vigil is the Program Manager of the Medical Cannabis Program.
11. The Act is premised upon certain categories of people and business being
qualified patient’s primary caregiver shall not be subject to arrest, prosecution or penalty in any
manner for the possession of or the medical use of cannabis if the quantity of cannabis does not
“practitioner shall not be subject to arrest or prosecution, penalized in any manner or denied any
right or privilege for recommending the medical use of cannabis or providing written
certification for the medical use of cannabis pursuant to the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use
Act.”
14. Additionally, N.M.S.A. 1978 § 26-2B-4(G) (2019) states that a licensed producer,
manufacturer, or testing facility “shall not be subject to arrest, prosecution or penalty, in any
2
manner, for the production, possession, manufacture, distribution, dispensing or testing of
medical cannabis, a “qualified patient” must first obtain a “registry identification card,” which is
issued by the DOH Medical Cannabis Program. See N.M.S.A. 1978 §26-2B-3(V) and (X) and
§26-2B-7(B).
diagnosed by a practitioner as having a debilitating medical condition and has received written
17. The “written certification” comes from a medical practitioner. The definition of
“written certification” within the Act is “a statement made on a department-approved form and
signed by a patient’s practitioner that indicates, in the practitioner’s professional opinion, that the
patient has a debilitating medical condition and the practitioner believes that the potential health
benefits of the medical use of cannabis would likely outweigh the health risks for the patient.”
18. The Act also contains a definition of “practitioner,” which is “a person licensed in
New Mexico to prescribe and administer drugs that are subject to the Controlled Substances
19. The Compassionate Use Act includes a list of medical conditions that are
considered to be a “debilitating medical condition,” and having one of those conditions will
make an individual eligible to be qualified to legally purchase and use medical cannabis in New
Mexico. Rather, the Act lists several specific medical conditions that may make an individual
3
eligible to be qualified to legally purchase and use medical cannabis in New Mexico. Those
20. A registry identification card issued allows a qualified patient to legally purchase
cannabis from a licensed producer and allows the qualified patient to use and transport cannabis
21. The registry identification is issued by the Department of Health. N.M.S.A. 1978
§26-2B-3(X).
22. The Act specifically states when and under what conditions DOH must issue a
department shall issue registry identification cards to a patient and to the primary caregiver for
that patient, if any, who submit the following, in accordance with the department's rules: (1)
a written certification; (2) the name, address and date of birth of the patient; (3) the name,
address and telephone number of the patient's practitioner; and (4) the name, address and date of
23. The 2019 amendments to the Act changed the definition of “qualified patient.”
24. Prior to the 2019 amendments to the Act, the definition of qualified patient was “a
resident of New Mexico who has been diagnosed by a practitioner as having a debilitating
medical condition and has received written certification and a registry identification card”
25. The 2019 amendments changed the definition of qualified patient to “a person
who has been diagnosed by a practitioner as having a debilitating medical condition and has
received written certification and a registry identification card...” (emphasis added). N.M.S.A.
4
26. By making this change to the law, the Legislature removed the requirement that
27. The Department of Health’s issuance of registry identification cards for use,
28. The Department of Health’s issuance of registry identification cards for use,
29. This is apparent from both the words of the statute and from prior caselaw.
30. “Mandamus lies to compel the performance of a ministerial act or duty that is
clear and indisputable.” New Energy Econ., Inc. v. Martinez, 2011–NMSC–006, ¶ 10, 149 N.M.
31. “A ministerial act is an act which an officer performs under a given state of facts,
exercise of his own judgment upon the propriety of the act being done.” Id. ¶ 10
32. N.M.S.A. 1978 §26-2B-7(B) states, “The department shall issue registry
identification cards to a patient and to the primary caregiver for that patient, if any, who submit
the following, in accordance with the department’s rules: (1) a written certification; (2) the name,
address and date of birth of the patient; (3) the name, address and telephone number of the
patient’s practitioner; and (4) the name, address and date of birth of the patient’s primary
33. The word “shall” indicates a ministerial action without the availability of
discretion.
5
34. N.M.S.A. 1978 §26-2B-7(C) (2019) further states, “The department shall verify
and shall approve or deny an application within thirty days of receipt. The department may
deny an application only if the applicant did not provide the information required
35. The Uniform Statute and Rule Construction Act governs how certain words and
36. N.M.S.A. 1978 § 12-2A-4(A) states that the words “shall” and “must” “express a
37. “One of the canons of statutory construction states that the words ‘shall’ and
‘will’ are mandatory and ‘may’ is permissive or directory.” Montano v. Los Alamos County,
1996-NMCA-108, ¶ 5.
38. Because N.M.S.A. 1978 §26-2B-7(B) states DOH “shall issue registry
identification cards,” the Department’s issuance of the cards is a mandatory duty that is clear,
39. Furthermore, NMSA 1978, §26-2B-7(B) describes the “given state of facts” under
40. NMSA 1978, § 26-2B-7(B) lists four, and only four, pieces of information that are
41. Additionally, NMSA 1978, § 26-2B-7(C) states, “The department may deny an
application only if the applicant did not provide the information required pursuant to
Subsection B of this section or if the department determines that the information provided
6
is false,” which precludes the Department of Health from requiring any other pieces of
information other than the four pieces listed in §26-2B-7(B) (emphasis added).
42. While NMSA 1978, §26-2B-7(B) contains the phrase “who submit the following,
in accordance with Department rules,” this phrase refers merely to the manner of submission of
the four listed pieces of information, rather than the substance of the information required.
43. “In accordance with Department rules” does not work to enlarge the
Department’s discretionary power over the issuance of registry identification facts; rather, it only
works to recognize the Department’s ability to specify the manner in which patients should
44. NMSA 1978, §26-2B-7(C) emphasizes that the Department does not have
discretion regarding what pieces of information are necessary to receive a registry identification
card: “The department may deny an application only if the applicant did not provide the
information required pursuant to Subsection B of this section or if the department determines that
45. In addition to the statutory language being obviously mandatory and ministerial,
there is legal precedent regarding DOH’s lack of discretion over registry identification cards.
47. The Court’s final order in that case states “As part of an initial application for a
patient card, the Department may require from patients and their practitioners no more
information that what is included in NMSA 1978 § 26-2B-3(H)” and “The Department may
7
the Department may not require that the ‘written certification’ contain any information or
attestation that is not expressly required by the Act” (Order, page 3).
48. The Kieve case reinforces that DOH may not add requirements beyond what is in
49. As explained further below, DOH currently requires prospective qualified patients
to submit a copy of a New Mexico driver’s license, in order to prove New Mexico residency.
50. The current application form used by DOH requires patients applicants to submit
a “clear copy of your current New Mexico Driver’s License or New Mexico photo ID.”
51. DOH’s requirement of a copy of a New Mexico driver’s license is, in and of
52. The statute does not require submission of a driver’s license from anyone,
resident or not.
53. The requirement of a driver’s license is directly contrary to statute and to the
Kieve ruling.
54. Respondent must cease requiring driver’s licenses and must issue registry
Persons Not New Mexico Residents Are Eligible To Be Qualified Patients and Must
Receive Registry Identification Cards
55. The plain language of the 2019 Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act indicates
that non-New Mexico-residents may obtain registry identification cards and participate in the
56. The plain language of the 2019 Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act indicates
that DOH must issue a registry identification card to an out-of-state resident who otherwise
8
57. “When interpreting a statute, a court’s primary goal is to facilitate and promote
the Legislature’s purpose.” Gandydancer, LLC v. Rock Hosue CGM, LLC, 2018-NMCA-064, ¶
7.”
58. “In discerning that purpose, ‘we look first to the plain language of the statute,
giving the words their ordinary meaning, unless the Legislature indicates a different one was
59. In another mandamus case, the Supreme Court stated, “A statute must be read and
given effect as it is written by the Legislature, not as the court may think it should be or would
have been written if the Legislature had envisaged all the problems and complications which
might arise…Courts must take the act as they find it and construe it according to the plain
meaning of the language employed.” Perea v. Baca, 1980-NMSC-079, ¶ 22, 94 N.M. 624.
60. The plain language of the current definition of qualified patient indicates that the
61. The language is “a person who has been diagnosed by a practitioner as having a
debilitating medical condition and has received written certification and a registry identification
62. A “person” is simply that: a human being, regardless of whether they are a New
63. Additionally, the word “person” replaces “New Mexico resident,” Which was
found in the law prior to the 2019 changes to the law. The replacement is a clear sign of
legislative intent to widen the reach of eligibility for the New Mexico medical cannabis program.
9
64. Although the Compassionate Use Act contains a definition of “reciprocal
65. The 2019 amendments added a new definition of “reciprocal participant” to the
Act, which is “an individual who holds proof of authorization to participate in the medical
cannabis program of another state of the United States, the District of Columbia, a territory or
commonwealth of the United States or a New Mexico Indian nation, tribe or pueblo.”
66. The Act does not require DOH to promulgate rules regarding reciprocal
participants until 2020: “By March 1, 2020, the secretary of health shall adopt and promulgate
rules relating to medical cannabis program reciprocity. The department may identify
requirements for the granting of reciprocity, including provisions limiting the period of time in
which a reciprocal participant may participate in the medical cannabis program.” N.M.S.A. 1978
§ 26-2B-7(I).
67. There is ample evidence from the statute indicating that “reciprocal participants”
are an entirely different category of card-holders separate and apart from “qualified patients.”
68. First, the definition of “registry identification card” at NMSA 1978, § 26-2B-3(X)
says it is a card issued to a “qualified patient” or “primary caregiver,” but not to a reciprocal
participant.
69. Second, NMSA 1978, § 26-2B-4, the section of the Act exempting MCP
participants from criminal penalties for their participation in cannabis-related activities contains
one exemption from prosecution for “qualified patients” and another separate exemption for
“reciprocal participants.” Thus, reciprocal participants and “qualified patients” are listed
separately as separate categories of eligible users by the Act itself. If reciprocal participants
10
were merely a subset of qualified patients, there would be no need to grant them separate explicit
exemptions.
medical cannabis, while reciprocal participants are allowed to possess “not more than the limit
identified by department rule” under § 26-2B-4(C) (stating that “a qualified patient or primary
caregiver [may purchase] not more than an adequate supply from a lawful source,” while a
“reciprocal participant [may] purchas[e] or obtain[] not more than the limit identified by
department rule”).
71. If reciprocal participants were merely a subset of qualified patients, there would
be no need to set different purchase limitations for the two different classes.
72. Fourth, the Medical Advisory Board of the Medical Cannabis Program is charged
with recommending “quantities of cannabis that are necessary to constitute an adequate supply
for qualified patients and primary caregivers,” and also with recommending “quantities of
cannabis that a reciprocal participant may obtain and possess.” N.M.S.A. 1978 § 26-2B-6.
73. This again demonstrates that “qualified patients” is not simply an umbrella term
that incorporates “reciprocal participants,” because qualified patients are subject to different
74. Fifth, reciprocal participants “shall not be required to comply with the registry
75. The definition of “qualified patient” is “a person who has been diagnosed by a
practitioner as having a debilitating medical condition and has received written certification and
11
76. A qualified patient has received a registry identification card, but reciprocal
participants do not receive registry identification cards. Therefore, a reciprocal participant is not
a qualified patient.
77. Therefore, the two classes are entirely different, and the definition of “qualified
Mexico resident qualified patient is that a reciprocal participant must be a resident of a state that
79. If a person lives in a state that does not allow medical cannabis, or does not allow
it for that person’s particular condition, that person cannot be a “reciprocal participant.”
80. The plain language of the definition of “qualified patient,” together with the larger
structure of the statute, includes New Mexico residents and non-New Mexico residents.
81. Further revealing the intent to allow non-residents to participate in the Medical
Cannabis Program is the requirement that patients must receive written certifications from
in New Mexico to prescribe and administer drugs that are subject to the Controlled Substances
82. The 2019 amendments to the Act do not obviate the requirement that a qualified
83. Therefore, a non-New Mexico resident must still receive a certification from a
medical practitioner licensed in New Mexico in order to receive a registry identification card.
84. Additionally, the 2019 amendments to the Compassionate Use Act included a
provision for the creation of “cannabis consumption areas.” These “cannabis consumption
12
areas” are defined as “an area within a licensed premises approved by the department where
cannabis may be consumed that complies with rule as established by the department.” N.M.S.A.
85. There are many conceivable classes of non-New Mexico residents who may wish
86. Those classes include, but are not limited to, out-of-state residents receiving
medical treatment in New Mexico and staying here for an extended period, but not long enough
to qualify as a resident; out-of-state residents who have second homes in New Mexico and do not
spend enough time in New Mexico to qualify as a resident; out-of-state residents who regularly
visit relatives, friends, or business interests in New Mexico and wish to maintain continuity of
cannabis ingestion during their visits; out-of-state residents contemplating or completing a move
to New Mexico who have not yet established residency; out-of-state residents who wish to spend
time in New Mexico to find out whether cannabis may help their medical conditions; a college
student attending an institute of higher learning in New Mexico who will not qualify as a New
Mexico resident during their college attendance; a visiting or interning scientist at one of New
Mexico’s scientific laboratories who will not stay long enough to establish official residence in
New Mexico.
88. The Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act clearly allows non-New Mexico
residents to become qualified patients and purchase medical cannabis lawfully within New
Mexico.
13
89. The Act does not allow non-New Mexico residents to transport cannabis across
state lines.
90. Any non-New Mexico resident who becomes a qualified patient does so with the
understanding that their use of cannabis is still subject to other laws, including laws prohibiting
91. The Petitioners in this case do not advocate for interstate transportation of
cannabis, and they do not argue that the Act makes such interstate transportation legal.
92. Out-of-state residents who apply for registry identification cards in New Mexico
may and should be educated regarding the legal consequences of transporting cannabis into or
93. The requirements for issuance of a medical cannabis registry identification care
from the New Mexico Department of Health Medical Cannabis Program are clear.
94. First, the applicant must be a “person.” N.M.S.A. 1978 §26-2B-3(V) (2019).
95. The applicant person must have one of the debilitating medical conditions listed at
form and signed by” a medical practitioner “licensed in New Mexico to prescribe and administer
drugs that are subject to the Controlled Substances Act” “that indicates, in the practitioner’s
professional opinion, that the patient has a debilitating medical condition and the practitioner
believes that the potential health benefits of the medical use of cannabis would likely outweigh
the health risks for the patient.” N.M.S.A. 1978 §26-2B-3(BB) and §26-2B-3(S) (2019).
14
97. The applicant person must submit the written certification to the Department of
Health along with the name, address and date of birth of the patient and the name, address and
100. Mr. Rodriguez owns a home in New Mexico, but he does not spend the requisite
101. Mr. Rodriguez is a principle of several businesses in New Mexico and comes to
102. Mr. Rodriguez also has immediate family members in New Mexico, and he
103. Mr. Rodriguez does not wish to transport cannabis across the border between
104. However, Mr. Rodriguez wishes to maintain his regimen of cannabis medication
105. Mr. Rodriguez intends to consume cannabis at his home in New Mexico when he
practitioner.
107. Mr. Rodriguez submitted the written certification to DOH on the form prescribed
by DOH, along with the names and addresses of him/herself and the practitioner who issued the
certification.
15
108. DOH issued a denial letter.
109. The reasons DOH gave for the denial were “ID you sent was from outside New
Mexico,” and “it does not contain a New Mexico address or New Mexico County of Residence.”
110. DOH did not deny Mr. Rodriguez’s application on any basis having to do with the
111. Therefore, DOH has conceded that Mr. Rodriguez obtained the necessary written
certification, and the only basis DOH has for denial is residency.
114. Dalhart, Texas is just over the state line from Clayton, New Mexico.
115. Mr. Meyers owns and operates several small business located in New Mexico,
including a retail liquor store and a check-cashing store. Meyers also leases and operates several
116. Mr. Meyers spends approximately three days per week in New Mexico, and does
not qualify as a “resident” of New Mexico, nor does he have a New Mexico driver’s license.
117. Mr. Meyers intends to travel to New Mexico from Dalhart, purchase medical
practitioner.
119. Mr. Meyers submitted the written certification to DOH on the form prescribed by
DOH, along with the names and addresses of him/herself and the practitioner who issued the
certification.
16
121. DOH did not deny Mr. Meyers’ application on any basis having to do with the
122. Therefore, DOH has conceded that Mr. Meyers obtained the necessary written
certification, and the only basis DOH has for denial is residency.
123. The basis for DOH’s denial was lack of a New Mexico driver’s license or ID card.
126. Ms. Sias’s brother and best friend both live in Las Cruces New Mexico, and she
127. Ms. Sias would like to obtain medical cannabis to alleviate the symptoms of her
128. Ms. Sias intends to travel to Las Cruces from El Paso, purchase medical cannabis
129. Ms. Sias has considered moving to New Mexico in order to obtain medical
cannabis lawfully, but her partner works in El Paso, and they cannot make the move to New
Mexico.
practitioner.
131. Ms. Sias submitted the written certification to DOH on the form prescribed by
DOH, along with the names and addresses of herself and the practitioner who issued the
certification.
17
133. The reasons DOH gave for the denial were “ID you sent was from outside New
Mexico,” and “it does not contain a New Mexico address or New Mexico County of Residence.”
134. DOH did not deny Ms. Sias’ application on any basis having to do with the
135. Therefore, DOH has conceded that Ms. Sias obtained the necessary written
certification, and the only basis DOH has for denial is residency.
136. All of these Petitioners met the qualifications described above but were
137. “Mandamus lies to compel the performance of a ministerial act or duty that is
clear and indisputable.” New Energy Econ., Inc. v. Martinez, 2011–NMSC–006, ¶ 10, 149 N.M.
138. “A ministerial act is an act which an officer performs under a given state of facts,
exercise of his own judgment upon the propriety of the act being done.” Id. ¶ 10
139. Kenny Vigil owes a ministerial duty to issue medical cannabis registry
identification cards to any person—whether a resident of New Mexico or not—who submits the
Department of Health that met the statutory criteria for issuance of a card.
141. As such, Kenny Vigil has a ministerial duty to Petitioners to issue the registry
identification cards.
18
143. The issuance of registry identification cards are acts which Defendants perform
under a given state of facts, in a prescribed manner, in obedience to a mandate of legal authority,
and without regard to the exercise of their own judgment upon the propriety of the particular
144. The “given state of facts” here is 1) being a person; 2) the person having one of
the debilitating medical conditions listed in statute; 3) the person obtaining “a statement made on
a department-approved form and signed by” a medical practitioner “licensed in New Mexico to
prescribe and administer drugs that are subject to the Controlled Substances Act” “that indicates,
in the practitioner’s professional opinion, that the patient has a debilitating medical condition and
the practitioner believes that the potential health benefits of the medical use of cannabis would
likely outweigh the health risks for the patient; and 4) the person submitting the written
certification to the Department of Health along with the name, address and date of birth of the
patient and the name, address and telephone number of the patient’s practitioner.
145. The prescribed manner here is the person’s submission of this information on the
DOH-prescribed form.
147. The lack of DOH’s power to exercise its judgment in determining whether to
issue a registry identification card is shown by the lack of any such delegation of power in the
148. Mandamus will issue if there is no “plain, speedy and adequate remedy in the
19
150. Petitioners do not have a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary
course of law.
151. Issue medical cannabis program registry identification cards to each of the
Petitioners.
152. Issue a medical cannabis program registry identification card to any person,
whether a New Mexico resident or not, who 1) has one of the debilitating medical conditions
listed in statute; 2) has obtained “a statement made on a department-approved form and signed
by” a medical practitioner “licensed in New Mexico to prescribe and administer drugs that are
subject to the Controlled Substances Act” “that indicates, in the practitioner’s professional
opinion, that the patient has a debilitating medical condition and the practitioner believes that the
potential health benefits of the medical use of cannabis would likely outweigh the health risks for
the patient;” and 3) has submitted that statement to the Department of Health along with the
name, address and date of birth of the patient and the name, address and telephone number of the
patient’s practitioner.
compliant manner.
155. Show cause before this court at ________________ a.m./p.m. on the ________
_________________________________
Honorable ___________________
20
SENATE PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR
SENATE BILL 406
AN ACT
.214251.3
Exhibit 2
SPAC/SB 406
is enacted to read:
ADMINISTRATION--RESTRICTION--EXEMPTIONS.--
guardian; and
.214251.3
- 2 -
(4) before the first administration of medical
treatment plan.
students;
subsection.
[bracketed material] = delete
.214251.3
- 3 -
SPAC/SB 406
department.
attend school;
school-sponsored activity; or
delete = ºbold, red, highlight, strikethrough»
qualified student;
.214251.3
- 4 -
cannabis to a qualified student in accordance with the
or by burning;
charter school;
activity;
.214251.3
- 5 -
SPAC/SB 406
valid for more than one year from the date of issuance."»SJC
act] Chapter 26, Article 2B NMSA 1978 may be cited as the "Lynn
Erin Armstrong."
.214251.3
- 6 -
solely from an intrastate source;
B. "cannabis":
resin extracted from any part of the plant; and every compound,
plant; fiber produced from the stalks; oil or cake made from
establishment to:
underscored material = new
.214251.3
- 7 -
SPAC/SB 406
program;
products;
and
Amendments: new = ºbold, blue, highlight»
license holders;
.214251.3
- 8 -
H. "cannabis product":
product;
(1) cancer;
(2) glaucoma;
spasticity;
.214251.3
- 9 -
SPAC/SB 406
arthritis;
health;
.214251.3
- 10 -
three-tenths percent on a dry weight basis;
a representative capacity;
product;
in the state;
Mexico who is at least eighteen years of age and who has been
underscored material = new
.214251.3
- 11 -
SPAC/SB 406
or
.214251.3
- 12 -
(2) to a primary caregiver that identifies the
document;
clinical health care from a site apart from the site where the
services;
cannabis; and
.214251.3
- 13 -
SPAC/SB 406
adequate supply;
.214251.3
- 14 -
subject to seizure or forfeiture pursuant to the Controlled
rule;
cannabis; or
.214251.3
- 15 -
SPAC/SB 406
unless:
.214251.3
- 16 -
identification card, the qualified patient or primary caregiver
not be forfeited under any state or local law providing for the
.214251.3
- 17 -
SPAC/SB 406
license.
.214251.3
- 18 -
relieve the qualified patient or primary caregiver from:
vehicle;
.214251.3
- 19 -
SPAC/SB 406
law."
.214251.3
- 20 -
debilitating medical conditions that qualify for the medical
use of cannabis;
use of cannabis;
cards; [and]
RULES--DUTIES--RECIPROCITY.--
.214251.3
- 21 -
SPAC/SB 406
.214251.3
- 22 -
[licensed producers] licensees; and
caregiver;
patient;
[bracketed material] = delete
.214251.3
- 23 -
SPAC/SB 406
whose application has been denied shall not reapply for six
by the department.
require by rule.
[bracketed material] = delete
.214251.3
- 24 -
in status of the qualified patient's debilitating medical
Use Act;
identification card; or
.214251.3
- 25 -
SPAC/SB 406
J. A reciprocal participant:
department rules;
FEES--LIMITATIONS--RULEMAKING--LICENSURE--ISSUANCE--
REPORTING.--
[bracketed material] = delete
.214251.3
- 26 -
the department shall not charge a fee relating to the medical
cannabis registry.
licensee.
[bracketed material] = delete
.214251.3
- 27 -
SPAC/SB 406
and
.214251.3
- 28 -
participation in the medical cannabis program established
products."
the following:»Hf2
.214251.3
- 29 -
SPAC/SB 406
Use Act.»Hf2
action" means:
employment;
underscored material = new
employment; or
.214251.3
- 30 -
compensation or in terms, conditions or privileges of
employment."»Hf2
conduct allowed under the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act."
education;
part; and
[bracketed material] = delete
.214251.3
- 31 -
SPAC/SB 406
forth in the document of gift but the purposes are not set
.214251.3
- 32 -
used for transplantation or therapy, the gift may be used for
research or education.
the purpose of the gift, the gift may be used only for
of this section.
of the organ.
the organ.
.214251.3
- 33 -
SPAC/SB 406
the person knows that the gift was not effectively made
document of gift.
delete = ºbold, red, highlight, strikethrough»
anatomical gift."
.214251.3
- 34 -
SECTION SJCº13. 14.»SJC A new section of the Family
MEDICAL CARE.--
grounds for:
.214251.3
- 35 -
SPAC/SB 406
- 36 -
delete = ºbold, red, highlight, strikethrough»
Amendments: new = ºbold, blue, highlight»
[bracketed material] = delete
underscored material = new
.214251.3
7/25/2019 | Chapter 26 - Drugs and Cosmetics - ARTICLE 2B Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act
Exhibit 2A
ARTICLE 2B
Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act
Chapter 26, Article 2B NMSA 1978 may be cited as the "Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act" in
honor of Lynn Pierson and Erin Armstrong.
ANNOTATIONS
Severability. — Laws 2007, ch. 210, §11 provided for the severability of the Lynn and Erin
Compassionate Use Act if any part or application thereof is held invalid.
The 2019 amendment, effective June 14, 2019, changed "Sections 1 through 7 of this act" to
"Chapter 26, Article 2B NMSA 1978".
The purpose of the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act is to allow the beneficial use of medical
cannabis in a regulated system for alleviating symptoms caused by debilitating medical conditions and
their medical treatments.
ANNOTATIONS
Effective dates. — Laws 2007, ch. 210, § 12 made the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act
effective July 1, 2007.
Severability. — Laws 2007, ch. 210, §11 provided for the severability of the Lynn and Erin
Compassionate Use Act if any part or application thereof is held invalid.
26-2B-3. Definitions.
A. "adequate supply" means an amount of cannabis, in any form approved by the department,
possessed by a qualified patient or collectively possessed by a qualified patient and the qualified
https://laws.nmonesource.com/w/nmos/Chapter-26-NMSA-1978?printMode=selected#!fragment/zoupio-_Toc11339171/BQCwhgziBcwMYgK4DsDWszIQewE4B… 1/16
7/25/2019 | Chapter 26 - Drugs and Cosmetics - ARTICLE 2B Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act
patient's primary caregiver that is determined by rule of the department to be no more than
reasonably necessary to ensure the uninterrupted availability of cannabis for a period of three months
and that is derived solely from an intrastate source;
B. "cannabis":
(1) means all parts of the plant Cannabis sativa L. containing a delta-9-
tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of more than three-tenths percent on a dry weight basis, whether
growing or not; the seeds of the plant; the resin extracted from any part of the plant; and every
compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture or preparation of the plant, its seeds or its resin; and
(2) does not include the mature stalks of the plant; fiber produced from the stalks; oil or
cake made from the seeds of the plant; any other compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture or
preparation of the mature stalks, fiber, oil or cake; the sterilized seed of the plant that is incapable of
germination; the weight of any other ingredient combined with cannabis to prepare topical or oral
administrations, food, drink or another product; or hemp;
C. "cannabis consumption area" means an area within a licensed premises approved by the
department where cannabis may be consumed that complies with rule as established by the
department;
D. "cannabis courier" means a person that is licensed by the department to transport usable
cannabis and cannabis products within the state from a cannabis establishment to:
(5) such other person that the department may by rule approve for participation in the
medical cannabis program;
(4) purchase, obtain, sell and transport cannabis products to other cannabis
establishments; and
https://laws.nmonesource.com/w/nmos/Chapter-26-NMSA-1978?printMode=selected#!fragment/zoupio-_Toc11339171/BQCwhgziBcwMYgK4DsDWszIQewE4B… 2/16
7/25/2019 | Chapter 26 - Drugs and Cosmetics - ARTICLE 2B Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act
G. "cannabis producer" means a person that is licensed by the department to possess, produce,
dispense, distribute and manufacture cannabis and cannabis products and sell wholesale or by direct
sale to qualified patients and primary caregivers;
H. "cannabis product":
(1) means a product that contains cannabis, including edible or topical products that may
also contain other ingredients; and
(2) does not include the weight of any other ingredient combined with cannabis or cannabis
extract to prepare topical or oral administrations, food, drink or another product;
I. "cannabis testing facility" means a person that is licensed by the department to perform tests
of cannabis products to analyze the strength or purity of the items and to collect cannabis samples
and transport cannabis products to the cannabis testing facility from cannabis establishments;
(1) cancer;
(2) glaucoma;
(4) damage to the nervous tissue of the spinal cord, with objective neurological indication of
intractable spasticity;
(6) positive status for human immunodeficiency virus or acquired immune deficiency
syndrome;
(7) admitted into hospice care in accordance with rules promulgated by the department;
https://laws.nmonesource.com/w/nmos/Chapter-26-NMSA-1978?printMode=selected#!fragment/zoupio-_Toc11339171/BQCwhgziBcwMYgK4DsDWszIQewE4B… 3/16
7/25/2019 | Chapter 26 - Drugs and Cosmetics - ARTICLE 2B Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act
(23) any other medical condition, medical treatment or disease as approved by the
department;
L. "hemp" means the plant cannabis sativa L. and any part of the plant, whether growing or not,
containing a delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of no more than three-tenths percent on a dry
weight basis;
M. "license" means a license issued pursuant to the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act;
O. "licensee representative" means an owner, director, officer, manager, employee, agent or other
representative of a licensee, to the extent that person acts in a representative capacity;
Q. "medical cannabis program" means the program established pursuant to the Lynn and Erin
Compassionate Use Act for authorization and regulation of the medical use of cannabis in the state;
S. "practitioner" means a person licensed in New Mexico to prescribe and administer drugs that
are subject to the Controlled Substances Act;
T. "primary caregiver" means a resident of New Mexico who is at least eighteen years of age and
who has been designated by the patient's practitioner as being necessary to take responsibility for
managing the well-being of a qualified patient with respect to the medical use of cannabis pursuant to
the provisions of the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act;
U. "produce" means to engage in any activity related to the planting or cultivation of cannabis;
V. "qualified patient" means a person who has been diagnosed by a practitioner as having a
debilitating medical condition and has received written certification and a registry identification card
pursuant to the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act on the basis of having been diagnosed, in
person or via telemedicine, by a practitioner as having a debilitating medical condition; provided that a
https://laws.nmonesource.com/w/nmos/Chapter-26-NMSA-1978?printMode=selected#!fragment/zoupio-_Toc11339171/BQCwhgziBcwMYgK4DsDWszIQewE4B… 4/16
7/25/2019 | Chapter 26 - Drugs and Cosmetics - ARTICLE 2B Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act
practitioner may only issue a written certification on the basis of an evaluation conducted via
telemedicine if the practitioner has previously examined the patient in person;
(1) to a qualified patient that identifies the bearer as a qualified patient and authorizes the
qualified patient to use cannabis for a debilitating medical condition; or
(2) to a primary caregiver that identifies the bearer as a primary caregiver authorized to
engage in the intrastate possession and administration of cannabis for the sole use of a qualified
patient who is identified on the document;
ANNOTATIONS
The 2019 amendment, effective June 14, 2019, defined certain terms related to medical cannabis
and medical cannabis programs as used in the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act; added new
Subsections B through I and redesignated former Subsections B and C as Subsections J and K,
respectively; in Subsection J, in Paragraph J(5), after the paragraph designation, added "seizure
disorder, including", added new Paragraphs J(8) through J(22) and redesignated former Paragraph
J(8) as Paragraph J(23); deleted Subsection D, which defined "licensed producer"; added new
Subsections L through R and redesignated former Subsections E and F as Subsections S and T,
respectively; added new Subsection U and redesignated former Subsection G as Subsection V; in
Subsection V, after "means a", deleted "resident of New Mexico" and added "person", and after
"Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act", deleted "and" and added "on the basis of having been
diagnosed, in person or via telemedicine, by a practitioner as having a debilitating medical condition;
provided that a practitioner may only issue a written certification on the basis of an evaluation
conducted via telemedicine if the practitioner has previously examined the patient in person"; added
https://laws.nmonesource.com/w/nmos/Chapter-26-NMSA-1978?printMode=selected#!fragment/zoupio-_Toc11339171/BQCwhgziBcwMYgK4DsDWszIQewE4B… 5/16
7/25/2019 | Chapter 26 - Drugs and Cosmetics - ARTICLE 2B Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act
new Subsections W through AA and redesignated former Subsection H as Subsection BB; and in
Subsection BB, after "means a statement", deleted "in a patient’s medical records or a statement"
and added "made on a department-approved form and", and after "health risks for the patient",
deleted "A written certification is not valid for more than one year from the date of issuance".
Temporary provisions. — Laws 2019, ch. 247, § 15 provided that a licensed producer, as defined
in the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act prior to the enactment of Laws 2019, ch. 247 shall be
considered to be a cannabis producer, as defined by Laws 2019, ch. 247.
Written certification is the functional equivalent of a prescription. — Under the Lynn and Erin
Compassionate Use Act, the written certification required by a person licensed in New Mexico to
prescribe and administer controlled substances is the functional equivalent of a prescription as
defined in the Worker’s Compensation Act, 52-1-1 NMSA 1978 et seq. Maez v. Riley Industrial,
2015-NMCA-049.
26-2B-4. Exemption from criminal and civil penalties for the medical use of
cannabis.
A. A qualified patient or a qualified patient's primary caregiver shall not be subject to arrest,
prosecution or penalty in any manner for the possession of or the medical use of cannabis if the
quantity of cannabis does not exceed an adequate supply; provided that a qualified patient or the
qualified patient's primary caregiver may possess that qualified patient's harvest of cannabis.
B. A reciprocal participant shall not be subject to arrest, prosecution or penalty in any manner for
the possession of or the medical use of cannabis if the quantity of cannabis does not exceed the limit
identified by department rule.
C. The following conduct is lawful and shall not constitute grounds for detention, search or arrest
of a person or for a violation of probation or parole, and cannabis products that relate to the conduct
are not contraband or subject to seizure or forfeiture pursuant to the Controlled Substances Act or the
Forfeiture Act [31-27-1 through 31-27-8 NMSA 1978]:
(1) a qualified patient or primary caregiver possessing or transporting not more than an
adequate supply or a reciprocal participant possessing or transporting not more than the limit
identified by department rule;
(2) a qualified patient or primary caregiver purchasing or obtaining not more than an
adequate supply from a lawful source or a reciprocal participant purchasing or obtaining not more
than the limit identified by department rule;
(3) a qualified patient using or being under the influence of cannabis; provided that the
qualified patient is acting consistent with law;
(5) with respect to cannabis cultivated under a personal production license, a qualified
patient or primary caregiver possessing, planting, cultivating, harvesting, drying, manufacturing or
transporting cannabis plants or cannabis products as allowed by department rule; provided that a
qualified patient or primary caregiver who possesses a personal production license shall not
https://laws.nmonesource.com/w/nmos/Chapter-26-NMSA-1978?printMode=selected#!fragment/zoupio-_Toc11339171/BQCwhgziBcwMYgK4DsDWszIQewE4B… 6/16
7/25/2019 | Chapter 26 - Drugs and Cosmetics - ARTICLE 2B Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act
manufacture cannabis products using an oil extractor solvent that is stored under pressure unless the
qualified patient or primary caregiver holds a separate license from the department permitting the
person to manufacture cannabis products using an oil extractor solvent that is under pressure.
D. Subsection A of this section shall not apply to a qualified patient under the age of eighteen
years, unless:
(1) the qualified patient's practitioner has explained the potential risks and benefits of the
medical use of cannabis to the qualified patient and to a parent, guardian or person having legal
custody of the qualified patient; and
(2) a parent, guardian or person having legal custody consents in writing to:
(c) control the dosage and the frequency of the medical use of cannabis by the qualified
patient.
E. A qualified patient or a primary caregiver shall be granted the full legal protections provided in
this section if the qualified patient or primary caregiver is in possession of a registry identification
card. If the qualified patient or primary caregiver is not in possession of a registry identification card,
the qualified patient or primary caregiver shall be given an opportunity to produce the registry
identification card before any arrest or criminal charges or other penalties are initiated.
F. A practitioner shall not be subject to arrest or prosecution, penalized in any manner or denied
any right or privilege for recommending the medical use of cannabis or providing written certification
for the medical use of cannabis pursuant to the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act.
H. Any property interest that is possessed, owned or used in connection with the medical use of
cannabis, or acts incidental to such use, shall not be harmed, neglected, injured or destroyed while in
the possession of state or local law enforcement officials. Any such property interest shall not be
forfeited under any state or local law providing for the forfeiture of property except as provided in the
Forfeiture Act. Cannabis, paraphernalia or other property seized from a qualified patient or primary
caregiver in connection with the claimed medical use of cannabis shall be returned immediately upon
the determination by a court or prosecutor that the qualified patient or primary caregiver is entitled to
the protections of the provisions of the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act, as may be evidenced
by a failure to actively investigate the case, a decision not to prosecute, the dismissal of charges or
acquittal.
I. state or local government shall not impose a criminal, civil or administrative penalty on a
licensee or a licensee representative, or on a person that allows property to be used by a licensee or
https://laws.nmonesource.com/w/nmos/Chapter-26-NMSA-1978?printMode=selected#!fragment/zoupio-_Toc11339171/BQCwhgziBcwMYgK4DsDWszIQewE4B… 7/16
7/25/2019 | Chapter 26 - Drugs and Cosmetics - ARTICLE 2B Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act
a licensee representative pursuant to a license, solely for conduct that is allowed pursuant to a
license.
J. A person shall not be subject to arrest or prosecution for a cannabis-related offense for simply
being in the presence of the medical use of cannabis as permitted under the provisions of the Lynn
and Erin Compassionate Use Act.
ANNOTATIONS
The 2019 amendment, effective June 14, 2019, revised provisions related to the exemption of the
medical use of cannabis from criminal and civil penalties; in Subsection A, after "qualified patient",
added "or a qualified patient’s primary caregiver", and after "adequate supply;", added "provided
that a qualified patient or the qualified patient’s primary caregiver may possess that qualified
patient’s harvest of cannabis"; deleted former Subsection B, added new Subsections B and C and
redesignated former Subsections C through G as Subsections D through H, respectively; in
Subsection E, added "qualified" preceding each occurrence of "patient" and added "primary"
preceding each occurrence of "caregiver"; in Subsection G, after "A", deleted "licensed producer"
and added "licensee or licensee representative", after "possession", added "manufacture", after
"dispensing", added "testing", and added the last sentence; and added a new Subsection I and
redesignated former Subsection H as Subsection J.
(1) criminal prosecution or civil penalties for activities not authorized in the Lynn and Erin
Compassionate Use Act;
(2) liability for damages or criminal prosecution arising out of the operation of a vehicle
while under the influence of cannabis; or
(b) at a public park, recreation center, youth center or other public place.
B. A person who makes a fraudulent representation to a law enforcement officer about the
person's participation in a medical use of cannabis program to avoid arrest or prosecution for a
cannabis-related offense is guilty of a petty misdemeanor and shall be sentenced in accordance with
the provisions of Section 31-19-1 NMSA 1978.
https://laws.nmonesource.com/w/nmos/Chapter-26-NMSA-1978?printMode=selected#!fragment/zoupio-_Toc11339171/BQCwhgziBcwMYgK4DsDWszIQewE4B… 8/16
7/25/2019 | Chapter 26 - Drugs and Cosmetics - ARTICLE 2B Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act
obtains or transports cannabis outside New Mexico, the licensee or the licensee's representative shall
be subject to arrest, prosecution and civil or criminal penalties pursuant to state law.
History: Laws 2007, ch. 210, § 5; 2019, ch. 247, § 5; 2019, ch. 247, § 5; 2019, ch. 261, § 2.
ANNOTATIONS
2019 Multiple Amendments. – Laws 2019, ch. 247, § 5 and Laws 2019, ch. 261, § 2, both effective
June 14, 2019, enacted different amendments to this section that can be reconciled. Pursuant to
12-1-8 NMSA 1978, Laws 2019, ch. 261, § 2, as the last act signed by the governor, is set out
above and incorporates both amendments. The amendments enacted by Laws 2019, ch. 247, § 5
and Laws 2019, ch. 261, § 2 are described below. To view the session laws in their entirety, see the
2019 session laws on NMOneSource.com.
The nature of the difference between the amendments is that Laws 2019, ch. 247, § 5, removed
certain restrictions related to the use or possession of cannabis, and Laws 2019, ch. 261, § 2,
removed certain restrictions related to the use or possession of cannabis.
Laws 2019, ch. 247, § 5, effective June 14, 2019, removed certain restrictions related to the use or
possession of cannabis; in Subsection A, Paragraph A(3), deleted Subparagraphs A(3)(a) and A(3)
(b) and redesignated former Subparagraphs A(3)(c) and A(3)(d) as Subparagraphs A(3)(a) and A(3)
(b), respectively; and in Subsection C, after "If a", deleted "licensed producer" and added "licensee
or the licensee’s representative", and after "outside New Mexico", deleted "in violation of federal law,
the licensed producer" and added "the licensee or the licensee’s representative".
Laws 2019, ch. 261, § 2, effective June 14, 2019, removed certain restrictions related to the use or
possession of cannabis; and in Subsection A, Paragraph A(3), deleted Subparagraphs A(3)(a) and
A(3)(b) and redesignated former Subparagraphs A(3)(c) and A(3)(d) as Subparagraphs A(3)(a) and
A(3)(b), respectively.
The secretary of health shall establish an advisory board consisting of nine practitioners
knowledgeable about the medical use of cannabis. The members shall be chosen for appointment by
the secretary from a list proposed by the New Mexico medical society, the New Mexico nurses
association, the New Mexico academy of family physicians, the New Mexico academy of physician
assistants, the New Mexico pharmacists association or the New Mexico Hispanic medical
association. A quorum of the advisory board shall consist of five members. The advisory board shall:
A. review and recommend to the department for approval additional debilitating medical
conditions that would benefit from the medical use of cannabis;
B. accept and review petitions to add medical conditions, medical treatments or diseases to the
list of debilitating medical conditions that qualify for the medical use of cannabis;
C. convene at least twice per year to conduct public hearings and to evaluate petitions, which
shall be maintained as confidential personal health information, to add medical conditions, medical
treatments or diseases to the list of debilitating medical conditions that qualify for the medical use of
cannabis;
https://laws.nmonesource.com/w/nmos/Chapter-26-NMSA-1978?printMode=selected#!fragment/zoupio-_Toc11339171/BQCwhgziBcwMYgK4DsDWszIQewE4B… 9/16
7/25/2019 | Chapter 26 - Drugs and Cosmetics - ARTICLE 2B Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act
D. issue recommendations concerning rules to be promulgated for the issuance of the registry
identification cards;
E. recommend quantities of cannabis that are necessary to constitute an adequate supply for
qualified patients and primary caregivers;
G. recommend quantities of cannabis that a reciprocal participant may obtain and possess.
ANNOTATIONS
The 2019 amendment, effective June 14, 2019, increased the number of members of the advisory
board, provided that additional entities may propose members to be appointed to the advisory
board, and required the advisory board to recommend formulation or preparations of cannabis and
to recommend quantities of cannabis that a reciprocal participant may obtain and possess; in the
introductory paragraph, after "consisting of", deleted "eight" and added "nine", after "practitioners",
deleted "representing the fields of neurology, pain management, medical oncology, psychiatry,
infectious disease, family medicine and gynecology. The practitioners shall be nationally board-
certified in their area of specialty and", after "New Mexico medical society,", added "the New Mexico
nurses association, the New Mexico academy of family physicians, the New Mexico academy of
physician assistants, the New Mexico pharmacists association or the New Mexico Hispanic medical
association", and after "shall consist of", deleted "three" and added "five"; and added new
Subsections F and G.
(2) collect fees from licensees; provided that the department shall not charge a fee relating
to the medical cannabis registry.
B. By December 20, 2019, the secretary of health shall adopt and promulgate rules to establish
fees for licenses for cannabis producers, cannabis manufacturers, cannabis couriers, cannabis testing
facilities or any other cannabis establishments whose operations are authorized pursuant to the Lynn
and Erin Compassionate Use Act.
C. The department shall establish application and licensing fees applicable to licenses for activity
related to the medical cannabis program.
D. The department shall administer licensure for medical cannabis program activity provided for in
the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act, which shall include personal production licenses and
licenses for:
https://laws.nmonesource.com/w/nmos/Chapter-26-NMSA-1978?printMode=selected#!fragment/zoupio-_Toc11339171/BQCwhgziBcwMYgK4DsDWszIQewE4B… 10/16
7/25/2019 | Chapter 26 - Drugs and Cosmetics - ARTICLE 2B Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act
E. The department shall not issue any other license provided for in this section to a cannabis
testing facility licensee.
F. In consultation with qualified patients and primary caregivers, the department shall produce an
assessment report annually, which shall be published to the public and that includes at a minimum an
evaluation of:
(1) the affordability of and accessibility to medical cannabis pursuant to the Lynn and Erin
Compassionate Use Act; and
(2) the needs of qualified patients who live in rural areas, federal subsidized housing or
New Mexico Indian nations, tribes or pueblos.
G. The department shall allow for the smoking, vaporizing and ingesting of cannabis products
within a cannabis consumption area on the premises if:
(2) cannabis consumption is not visible from any public place or from outside the cannabis
consumption area; and
(3) qualified patients who consume cannabis on the premises have a designated driver or
other means of transportation consistent with current law.
ANNOTATIONS
Effective dates. — Laws 2019, ch. 247 contained no effective date provision, but, pursuant to N.M.
Const., art. IV, § 23, was effective June 14, 2019, 90 days after the adjournment of the legislature.
A. After consultation with the advisory board, the department shall promulgate rules in accordance
with the State Rules Act [Chapter 14, Article 4 NMSA 1978] to implement the purpose of the Lynn and
Erin Compassionate Use Act. The rules shall:
(1) govern the manner in which the department will consider applications for registry
identification cards and for the renewal of identification cards for qualified patients and primary
caregivers;
https://laws.nmonesource.com/w/nmos/Chapter-26-NMSA-1978?printMode=selected#!fragment/zoupio-_Toc11339171/BQCwhgziBcwMYgK4DsDWszIQewE4B… 11/16
7/25/2019 | Chapter 26 - Drugs and Cosmetics - ARTICLE 2B Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act
(2) define the amount of cannabis that is necessary to constitute an adequate supply,
including amounts for topical treatments;
(3) identify criteria and set forth procedures for including additional medical conditions,
medical treatments or diseases to the list of debilitating medical conditions that qualify for the medical
use of cannabis. Procedures shall include a petition process and shall allow for public comment and
public hearings before the advisory board;
(4) set forth additional medical conditions, medical treatments or diseases to the list of
debilitating medical conditions that qualify for the medical use of cannabis as recommended by the
advisory board;
(5) identify requirements for the licensure of cannabis producers and cannabis production
facilities, cannabis couriers, cannabis manufacturers, cannabis testing facilities and any other
cannabis establishments that the department may license and set forth procedures to obtain licenses;
(6) develop a distribution system for the medical cannabis program that provides for:
(a) cannabis production facilities within New Mexico housed on secured grounds and
operated by licensees; and
(b) distribution of cannabis to qualified patients or their primary caregivers to take place at
locations that are designated by the department and that are not within three hundred feet of any
school, church or daycare center that were in existence in that location before the licensee distributing
medical cannabis nearby was licensed; provided that this distance requirement shall not apply to
distribution at the home of the qualified patient or primary caregiver;
(7) identify requirements for testing and labeling of cannabis and cannabis products for
quality assurance. The department shall adopt and promulgate rules pursuant to this paragraph by
December 20, 2019;
(8) determine additional duties and responsibilities of the advisory board; and
B. The department shall issue registry identification cards to a patient and to the primary caregiver
for that patient, if any, who submit the following, in accordance with the department's rules:
(3) the name, address and telephone number of the patient's practitioner; and
(4) the name, address and date of birth of the patient's primary caregiver, if any.
C. The department shall verify the information contained in an application submitted pursuant to
Subsection B of this section and shall approve or deny an application within thirty days of receipt. The
department may deny an application only if the applicant did not provide the information required
pursuant to Subsection B of this section or if the department determines that the information provided
is false. A person whose application has been denied shall not reapply for six months from the date
of the denial unless otherwise authorized by the department.
https://laws.nmonesource.com/w/nmos/Chapter-26-NMSA-1978?printMode=selected#!fragment/zoupio-_Toc11339171/BQCwhgziBcwMYgK4DsDWszIQewE4B… 12/16
7/25/2019 | Chapter 26 - Drugs and Cosmetics - ARTICLE 2B Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act
D. The department shall issue a registry identification card within five days of approving an
application, and a card shall expire three years after the date of issuance.
(1) the name and date of birth of the qualified patient and primary caregiver, if any;
(2) the date of issuance and expiration date of the registry identification card; and
F. A person who possesses a registry identification card shall notify the department of any
change in the person's name, qualified patient's practitioner, qualified patient's primary caregiver or
change in status of the qualified patient's debilitating medical condition within ten days of the change.
G. Possession of or application for a registry identification card shall not constitute probable cause
or give rise to reasonable suspicion for a governmental agency to search the person or property of the
person possessing or applying for the card.
H. The department shall maintain a confidential file containing the names and addresses of the
persons who have either applied for or received a registry identification card. Individual names on the
list shall be confidential and not subject to disclosure, except:
(2) to authorized employees of state or local law enforcement agencies, but only for the
purpose of verifying that a person is lawfully in possession of a registry identification card; or
(3) as provided in the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.
I. By March 1, 2020, the secretary of health shall adopt and promulgate rules relating to medical
cannabis program reciprocity. The department may identify requirements for the granting of
reciprocity, including provisions limiting the period of time in which a reciprocal participant may
participate in the medical cannabis program.
J. A reciprocal participant:
(1) may participate in the medical cannabis program in accordance with department rules;
(2) shall not be required to comply with the registry identification card application and
renewal requirements established pursuant to this section and department rules;
(3) shall at all times possess proof of authorization to participate in the medical cannabis
program of another state, the District of Columbia, a territory or commonwealth of the United States or
a New Mexico Indian nation, tribe or pueblo and shall present proof of that authorization when
purchasing cannabis from a licensee; and
(4) shall register with a licensee for the purpose of tracking sales to the reciprocal
participant in an electronic system that is accessible to the department.
https://laws.nmonesource.com/w/nmos/Chapter-26-NMSA-1978?printMode=selected#!fragment/zoupio-_Toc11339171/BQCwhgziBcwMYgK4DsDWszIQewE4B… 13/16
7/25/2019 | Chapter 26 - Drugs and Cosmetics - ARTICLE 2B Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act
ANNOTATIONS
Cross references. — For the Federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996,
see 42 U.S.C. § 300gg et seq.
The 2019 amendment, effective June 14, 2019, provided additional duties for the department of
health; in the section heading, added "reciprocity"; in Subsection A, in the introductory paragraph,
deleted "No later than October 1, 2007, and", in Paragraph A(5), after "licensure of", added
"cannabis", and after "production facilities", added "cannabis couriers, cannabis manufacturers,
cannabis testing facilities and any other cannabis establishments that the department may license",
in Paragraph A(6), after "medical cannabis", added "program", in Subparagraph A(6)(b), after
"daycare center", added "that were in existence in that location before the licensee distributing
medical cannabis nearby was licensed; provided that this distance requirement shall not apply to
distribution at the home of the qualified patient or primary caregiver", added a new Paragraph A(7)
and redesignated former Paragraphs A(7) and A(8) as Paragraphs A(8) and A(9), respectively; in
Subsection D, after "shall expire", deleted "one year" and added "three years"; added new
subsection designation "E." and redesignated former Subsections E through G as Subsections F
through H, respectively; and added Subsections I and J.
The department shall require a qualified patient to reapply for a registry identification card no
sooner than two years and eleven months from the date the patient's current registry identification
card is issued; provided that, in order to remain eligible for participation in the medical cannabis
program established pursuant to the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act, a qualified patient shall
submit annually to the department a statement from a practitioner indicating that:
A. the practitioner has examined the qualified patient during the preceding twelve months;
C. the practitioner believes that the potential health benefits of the medical use of cannabis would
likely outweigh the health risks for the qualified patient.
ANNOTATIONS
Effective dates. — Laws 2019, ch. 247 contained no effective date provision, but, pursuant to N.M.
Const., art. IV, § 23, was effective June 14, 2019, 90 days after the adjournment of the legislature.
The department shall not limit the amount of THC concentration in a cannabis product; provided
that the department may by rule adopt requirements for apportionment and packaging of cannabis
https://laws.nmonesource.com/w/nmos/Chapter-26-NMSA-1978?printMode=selected#!fragment/zoupio-_Toc11339171/BQCwhgziBcwMYgK4DsDWszIQewE4B… 14/16
7/25/2019 | Chapter 26 - Drugs and Cosmetics - ARTICLE 2B Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act
products.
ANNOTATIONS
Effective dates. — Laws 2019, ch. 247 contained no effective date provision, but, pursuant to N.M.
Const., art. IV, § 23, was effective June 14, 2019, 90 days after the adjournment of the legislature.
(1) restrict an employer's ability to prohibit or take adverse employment action against an
employee for use of, or being impaired by, medical cannabis on the premises of the place of
employment or during the hours of employment; or
(2) apply to an employee whose employer deems that the employee works in a safety-
sensitive position.
ANNOTATIONS
Effective dates. — Laws 2019, ch. 247 contained no effective date provision, but, pursuant to N.M.
Const., art. IV, § 23, was effective June 14, 2019, 90 days after the adjournment of the legislature.
A person who is serving a period of probation or parole or who is in the custody or under the
supervision of the state or a local government pending trial as part of a community supervision
program shall not be penalized for conduct allowed under the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act.
ANNOTATIONS
Effective dates. — Laws 2019, ch. 247 contained no effective date provision, but, pursuant to N.M.
Const., art. IV, § 23, was effective June 14, 2019, 90 days after the adjournment of the legislature.
https://laws.nmonesource.com/w/nmos/Chapter-26-NMSA-1978?printMode=selected#!fragment/zoupio-_Toc11339171/BQCwhgziBcwMYgK4DsDWszIQewE4B… 15/16
7/25/2019 | Chapter 26 - Drugs and Cosmetics - ARTICLE 2B Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act
https://laws.nmonesource.com/w/nmos/Chapter-26-NMSA-1978?printMode=selected#!fragment/zoupio-_Toc11339171/BQCwhgziBcwMYgK4DsDWszIQewE4B… 16/16
FILED IN MY OFFICE
DISTRICT COURT CLERK
4/29/2015 4:25:50 PM
STEPHEN T. PACHECO
Gloria Landin
Plaintiff,
v. No. D 101-CV-2014-00140
Defendant.
ORDER
THIS MATTER having come before the Court for Trial on the Merits on April 13 and
14, 2015, and counsel for all parties making their appearance and the Court having considered
the argument and authorities of counsel, and having reviewed all matters of record (all exhibits to
this hearing have been scanned and attached hereto) including post trial papers, and being fully
Plaintiff claims that Defendant (New Mexico Departljient of Health, DOH, the
../
Department) has exceeded its statutory authority in imposing additional requirements on certain
applicants for medical cannabis licenses (program), contrary to the Lynn and Erin
Defendant claims that it has not exceeded its statutory authority in promulgating Medical
Cannabis Program Rules in accordance with the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act, NMSA
At issue is 1) whether the Department exceeded its authority by requiring a patient when
alleging Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) as a "debilitating medical condition" certify that
Exhibit 3
1
"standard treatment have failed to bring adequate relief' as a pre-condition to certification into
the program 2) whether the Department exceeded its authority by requiring a patient when
alleging Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) as a "debilitating medical condition" provide
The Court ' s opinion does not concern itself with the many policy issues involved in the
implementation of this statute or the medical efficacy of medical cannabis for any particular
debilitating medical condition. Instead, it focuses on the New Mexico Department of Health's
implementation of the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act and whether they have exceeded
their statutory mandate and delegation when dealing with applications involving PTSD. See
FF40-43.
It 1s clear in New Mexico that when the legislature has declared the policy and
established primary standards to which agencies like the Department of Health must conform,
the state agencies only have the power necessary to the accomplish of the purposes of the statute.
The Department of Health has interjected itself and its judgement between the patient and his or
her doctor in requiring an exhaustion of treatment remedies before declaring a patient eligible for
the medical cannabis program. For these reasons, the Court finds in part on behalf of Carola
Kieve.
1. The Department has NOT exceeded its authority by requiring the submission of
medical records by patients applying to the program with PTSD if that requirement is limited to
2
2. There is no statutory authority for the Department to require that a PTSD patient's
certifying practitioner attest that "standard treatments have failed to bring adequate relief' as a
3. As part of an initial application for a patient card, the Department may require
from patients and their practitioners no more information that what is included in NMSA 1978 §
26-2B-3(H).
support of a patient's application, but the Department may not require that the "written
certification" contain any information or attestation that is not expressly required by the Act.
However, the Court finds that the Department of Health has authority of verify the diagnosis of
PTSD and may: request medical records from a patient and/or a patient's practitioner only 1) to
verify the truthfulness of the patient's application, i.e. regarding diagnosis 2) if the Department
has reason to believe that the patient has submitted false information regarding diagnosis.
Statute
The purpose of the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act is to allow the
beneficial use of medical cannabis in a regulated system for alleviating
symptoms caused by debilitating medical conditions and their medical treatments.
3
(4) damage to the nervous tissue of the spinal cord, with objective
neurological indication of intractable spasticity;
(5) epilepsy;
(6) positive status for human immunodeficiency virus or acquired immune
deficiency syndrome;
(7) admitted into hospice care in accordance with rules promulgated by the
department; or
(8) any other medical condition, medical treatment or disease as approved by
the department;
4
B. accept and review petitions to add medical conditions, medical treatments
or diseases to the list of debilitating medical conditions that qualify for
the medical use of cannabis;
C. convene at least twice per year to conduct public hearings and to evaluate
petitions, which shall be maintained as confidential personal health
information, to add medical conditions, medical treatments or diseases to the
list of debilitating medical conditions that qualify for the medical use of
cannabis;
A. No later than October 1, 2007, and after consultation with the advisory board,
the department shall promulgate rules in accordance with the State Rules Act
to implement the purpose of the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act. The
rules shall:
( 1) govern the manner in which the department will consider applications for
registry identification cards and for the renewal of identification cards for
qualified patients and primary caregivers;
(3) identify criteria and set forth procedures for including additional medical
conditions, medical treatments or diseases to the list of debilitating
medical conditions that qualify for the medical use of cannabis.
Procedures shall include a petition process and shall allow for public
comment and public hearings before the advisory board;
(4) set forth additional medical conditions, medical treatments or
diseases to the list of debilitating medical conditions that qualify for
the medical use of cannabis as recommended by the advisory board;
5
C. The department shall verify the information contained in an application
submitted pursuant to Subsection B of this section and shall approve or
deny an application within thirty days of receipt. The department may
deny an application only if the applicant did not provide the information
required pursuant to Subsection B of this section or if the department
determines that the information provided is false. A person whose
application has been denied shall not reapply for six months from the date
of the denial unless otherwise authorized by the department.
6
(6) positive status for human immunodeficiency virus or acquired immune
deficiency syndrome; and
(7) admission into hospice care in accordance with rules promulgated by
the department.
7
(9) amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Lou Gehrig's disease);
(10) inclusion body myositis;
(11) spasmodic torticollis (cervical dystonia);
(12) Parkinson's disease;
(13) Huntington's disease;
(14) ulcerative colitis; and
(15) such other conditions as the secretary may approve.
8
qualified patient, and shall conduct an in-person physical or mental
evaluation of the applicant or qualified patient prior to issuing a
certification.
(4) A practitioner may be prohibited from certifying patient applications
for:
(a) failure to comply with any provision of this rule;
(b) falsification of any material or information submitted to the
department; _
(c) threatening or harming an employee of a producer, a medical
practitioner, a patient, or an employee of the department; or
(d) any determination by the practitioner's licensing body that
practitioner has engaged in unprofessional or dishonorable conduct.
certifies patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) to the Medical Cannabis Program
pursuant to the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act, NMSA 1978, §§26-2B-1 through 7
condition for enrollment in the Medical Cannabis Program in 2010 by then Cabinet Secretary
Alfredo Vigil, M.D., following a recommendation for addition of PTSD by the Medical
the Medical Cannabis Program require "medical records that document an assessment by a
licensed psychiatrist and a DSM-IV diagnosis of PTSD", and also requested that "the psychiatrist
should attest that other treatment modalities have failed to provide adequate relief of symptoms".
9
The first requirement that the patient provided medical records at the time of the application or
after is consistent with if not taken directly from the language of NMSA 26-2B=3H.
4. When PTSD was added to the Rule in 2010, the Rule required that "a patient
applying on the basis of having any qualifying condition must submit written certification from
the patient's practitioner which must attest ... that standard treatments have failed to bring
5. In the most recent version of the rule the Department in an effort to lessen the
impact of the requirement cited above added the following language to 7.34.3.8 in bold: that
standard treatments have failed to bring adequate relief, unless the practitioner determines
6. The additional requirements cited in paragraphs four and five above are in
addition to and duplicate of the statutory provision that the practitioner attest to the: "potential
risks and benefits" of the use of medical cannabis for the condition have been discussed with the
patient.
7. The Rule also required that medical records confirming a diagnosis of PTSD by a
PTSD in order for such an application to be accepted; this provision was amended in 2015 to
that standard treatments have failed to bring adequate relief based in part on concern that
cannabis should not be utilized as a treatment of first resort for Department-approved conditions
such as PTSD.
10
9. Currently, as in 2010, there are very few medical studies regarding the effects of
cannabis on persons with PTSD, and there are very few double-blinded clinical studies of the
effects of cannabis on human subjects, which may result in part from the fact that cannabis is
identified as a Schedule I drug in the U.S. Controlled Substances Act, rendering it unlawful to
possess or distribute under Federal law. However, it is also true that there are no double-blind
studies for any of the conditions the Department of Health approved for treatment by medical
cannabis.
10. All and any concerns described by DOH in Paragraph 9 above, are addressed
through there regulatory authority to list or delist debilitating medical conditions. That is the
gatekeeper role of DOH in this process that fall within their delegated regulatory authority.
11. Diagnoses for PTSD are subjective in nature, insofar as they are primarily based
upon the reports of the individual. However, there is an objective test provide for in the Rules.
12. The vast majority of persons enrolled in the Medical Cannabis Program have
enrolled under Department-approved conditions, and most of those individuals have enrolled by
certifying for PTSD and chronic pain. It is clear from the Medical Director's testimony and that
of Dr. Vigil, that DOH has concerns that the diagnosis of PTSD may or is misused to obtain
13. Dr. Kieve has submitted to the New Mexico Department of Health's Medical
Cannabis Program documentation supporting various patients' applications for medical cannabis
14. Several of Dr. Kieve' s patients have sought Patient Cards for the treatment of the
11
15. Some of Dr. Ki eve's patients' applications for Patient Cards remain pending, due
to the fact that the applications have been neither granted nor denied by the Medical Director of
the Medical Cannabis Program, sometimes contrary to the patients' wishes. See Plaintiff's
16. The Medical Director of the Medical Cannabis Program failed to approve or
delayed the approval of the subject applications of certain of Dr. Kieve's patients because Dr.
Kieve did not submit to him medical records or evidence that other treatment modalities have
been attempted and have failed in the treatment of her patients' PTSD symptoms.
17. The Medical Director demanded medical records of certain of Dr. Kieve's
patients as well as evidence that other treatment modalities have been attempted and have failed
18. The Medical Director has stated that, until Dr. Kieve submits the medical records,
as required under the contract rules, and other information, the patients' Patient Cards will not be
19. The purpose of the New Mexico Medical Cannabis Program is to allow for the
lawful use of medical cannabis by individuals with certain qualifying medical conditions.
20. Dr. Vigil, who was on the ground floor during the inception of the program,
testified that regulations were required in essence to prevent the State from getting in trouble
21. The Act enumerates seven conditions that qualify for treatment with medical
cannabis.
22. The Act grants the Department the authority to additional medical conditions
12
23. As of the date of these findings, the Department has added at or near nine
additional debilitating medical conditions by regulation. PTSD is one of the debilitating medical
24. The Act states that the Department "shall issue" a Patient Card to a patient who
submits (a) a written certification; (b) the name, address and date of birth of the patient; (c) the
name, address and telephone number of the patient's practitioner; and (d) the name, address and
date of birth of the patient's primary caregiver, if any. NMSA 1978 § 26-2B-3(H).
25. The Act defines "written certification" as "a statement in a patient's medical
opinion, the patient has a debilitating medical condition and the practitioner believe that the
potential heal benefits of the medical use of cannabis would likely outweigh the health risks for
27. The Act does not contain language regarding a patient or a doctor submitting
medical records to the Department in order to receive a Patient Card, but it does permit the
28. The Act does not require a single medical certification be supported by medical
records, but it does require both in language and purpose verification of the debilitating medical
condition.
29. It is the current and ongoing practice of the Department to require PTSD patients
practitioner or prescribing psychologist and 2) evidence that "standard treatments" have failed .
30. Dr. Kieve has been treating patients for PTSD since 2010. Dr. Kieve has treated
13
31. Medical Cannabis treats the symptoms of PTSD. It allows or assists in the use
32. Plaintiffs Exhibit 1 outlines exactly what the doctor is to be providing when
33. Plaintiffs Exhibit 1 shows what the Department requires for "Medical Reasons
for Provider Certification". It clearly requires that the medical provider attest that standard
34. Plaintiffs Exhibit 2 states in the certification that a doctor may make a medical
judgment regarding medical cannabis. Dr. Kieve testified that her certification on the form
requiring her to certify that "the risks outweigh the benefits" takes into account any adverse
effects medical cannabis may have on the patient on other therapies or that may or may not have
worked.
35. There is no difference between the right side and the left side of Exhibit 2 except
that additional requirements are imposed for these submissions are provided for on the right side
at Exhibit 2. Exhibit 2 also reads "Verification of medical information may include, with patient
consent, examination of medical records documenting the patient has a current diagnosis of a
36. Plaintiffs Exhibit 3 shows that the Department of Health is gomg beyond
verification and focusing on the physician's treatment. In the Note section, it states "since you
have only seen Dr. Kieve once in consultation, we need prior records of failed therapies." It is
clear from this exhibit that the Department of Health is denying an application or delaying an
application based on a request that the patient exhaust therapeutic alternatives. This is not
14
37. Plaintiffs Exhibit 4 again sets forth the requirement from the Department of
Health as "provide documentation of medications or standard treatments that have failed". This
is not a requirement upon which they can deny an application under any reading of the statute.
checklist. It is within the Department's authority in verifying the application to ask for a medical
39. Page 2 of Plaintiffs Exhibit 6 illustrates the issues in this case. This portion of
By signing below you are certifying, that based on your in person examination of the
You have discussed the potential risks and benefits with the patient and
benefits outweigh risk
If requested you can provide records that reflect history and treatment of
diagnosis.
The Court finds that the first and second bullets are permitted by statute. The
requirements for the third and fourth bullets go beyond the authority granted by the New Mexico
Legislature and do not conform to the requirements or abilities of the New Mexico Department
of Health to "verify" the application. The Department of Health is permitted to request records to
40. Exhibit A is the Medical Advisory Committee Report presented to the New
Mexico Medical Canvas Program at the public meeting on Thursday, January 15, 2009. These
15
are the minutes for the Committee's recommendations of other debilitating conditions that are
41. The second page of Exhibit A, Subpart 1, are notes for "conditions that are
43. Paragraph 2 of Exhibit A, Subpart F, indicates under Clinical Data "there are no
specific clinical trials data regarding the use of cannabinoids for the treatment of PTSD." This
information is relevant to the numerous references of lack of double-blind studies to verify the
effect cannot be the Lloyd's for the treatment of PTSD. However, the record reflects that there
are no such studies for any of the other conditions listed, either in statute or those added by the
44. Paragraph 4 of Exhibit A states clearly under "Verification of the condition" that
"there are DSM-IV criteria for making the diagnosis of PTSD". It sets no other criteria.
45. Paragraph 5 continues with the Verification Condition and states "the Medical
Cannabis Program should require medical records that document an assessment by a licensed
psychiatrist and a DSM-IV diagnosis of PTSD". However, the panel goes on to recommend that
"in addition, the psychiatrist should attest that other treatment modalities have failed to provide
adequate relief of symptoms and that medical cannabis might be of benefit to the patient". These
V. Analysis
At the outset, it should be noted that the area of drug control is one in which some form
To be effective, a drug control program must be reviewed continuously, and adjusted when
16
necessary, in light of new knowledge concerning the drug. The legislature, by its nature, has
neither the facilities nor the expertise to assume this task. Furthermore, because the legislature is
not in continuous session, it cannot give the drug control program constant attention, the lack of
which could result in a controlled substance being disseminated throughout the State before
effective controls were instituted. See e.g. State v. Edwards, 572 S.W.2d 917,919 (Tenn.1978).
That said there remain strict limits under New Mexico law regarding how far a State
Agency can deviate from their statutory delegated duty, especially when it is so specifically
defined.
The Supreme Court said in a case involving a delegation of authority under New
The legislature has declared the policy and established primary standards to which
the agencies must conform. The Authority and other state agencies are
delegated only that power necessary to the accomplishment of the purposes
of the statute. Beyond that, it does not delegate legislative power or confer
executive or judicial authority. The legislature has not delegated its authority
to make a law but has delegated power to determine facts upon which the law
makes its own action depend. (Emphasis added.)
Montoya v. O'Toole, 1980-NMSC-045, 94 N.M. 303,304,610 P.2d 190, 191. (Citing State v.
New Mexico State Authority, 76 N.M. 1, 13,411 P.2d 984,993 (1966).)
The Department of Health argues that the Court should give deference to its
of the statute, this Court need not defer to the Department's interpretation. See Regents of Univ.
of NM, 1998-NMSC-020, ,r 17, 125 N.M. 401, 962 P.2d 1236. This Court simply declines to
depart from the plain language of the N.M. Stat. Ann. § 26-2B-2 because there is no ambiguity
17
within this statute. See Cobb v. State Canvassing Bd., 2006-NMSC-034, 140 N.M. 77, 92, 140
P.3d 498, 513. The Statute does not grant the Department the authority it seeks.
In this case, the role of the Department of Health is clear. As Dr. Vigil described in his
testimony and consistent with the statutory purpose, the Department of Health is to regulate the
application of and dispensing of the Medical Cannabis as permitted under the Act. NMSA 1978
§ 26-2B-2. The particular medical efficacy of medical cannabis on any of the listed conditions is
not known because not many studies have been performed. See FF 9, 10.
We apply statutes according to their plain meaning, unless adherence to the literal
meaning would lead to injustice, absurdity, or internal contradiction. T&T Taxi. Ltd. V. NM.
Pub. Regulation Comm 'n., 2006-NMSC-016, ~5, 139 N.M. 550, 135 P.3d 814. See also FF 2,3
19-23.
As outlined above, a "qualified patient" is one who has been "diagnosed" as having a
"debilitating medical condition" and has received "written certification"' of such. NMSA 1978
§6-2-B-3. All these terms are defined, most notably "written certification", which is a statement
.in a patient's medical records or a statement signed by a patient's practitioner that, in the
practitioner's professional opinion, the patient has a debilitating medical condition and the
practitioner believes that the potential health benefits of the medical use of cannabis would likely
outweigh the health risks for the patient. See Id. See also FF32-35. That is the entire scope of the
''certification." However, it is clear that the Department of Health has gone beyond what is
This is bolstered by the clear language of NMSA 1978 § 26-2B-7, which read that the
department SHALL issue registry identification cards who submit a "written ce1iification" and
other identifying information. See NMSA 1978 § 26-2B-7B. Subpart C, then tells the
18
Department that they have the authority to '·verify the information contained in an application
submitted pursuant to Subsection B". It states further '·the department may deny and application
only if the applicant did not provide the information required pursuant to Subsection B of the
section or if the depa1irnent determines that the information is false." See FF 44.45
The Department in its own rules, by their title, acknowledge that they have gone beyond
In NMAC 7.34.3.8 they insert subpart C and title it '·additional application requirements
for the department approved conditions." 7.34.3.8 Cl and C2, C4 confcmn to NMSA 1978 § 26-
2B-3H and bon-ow language exactly from the statute. It is C(3), that departs:
Department of Health argues they have granted authority under NMSA 1978 § 26-2B-6
which reads that the Secretary of Health through and advisory board shall: accept and review
petitioner so add medical conditions, medical treatments or diseases to the list of debilitating
medical conditions that qualify for the medical use of cannabis. See Id. The Court disagrees.
This grant of authority is the gate keeper role of the department to add to the list of debilitating
conditions, not to condition to the treatment of those conditions by the use of medical cannabis.
The term "medical treatment" must be read in in context of the complete statutory language,
19
segregate it would read: add ... medical treatment to the list of debilitating medical conditions that
qualify for the medical use of cannabis. Thus NMSA 1978 § 26-2B-6 is allowing the Department
"debilitating medical condition'' it is not granting authority to the Department of Health to add
The Depm1ment argues that if this Court limits the Depm1ment' s authority in this case it
This Court respectfully disagrees. What is contained in NMAC 7.34.3.8 (4) is not similar
to in kind or wording to 7.34.3.8 (C)(3). The first is an objective test to verify the diagnosis the
other is a mandate to the patient and to the doctor that they exhaust prescriptive or other
treatment remedies. Subsection (A)(4) is more in line with (8)(7) that requires that a diagnosis
for PTSD must meet "the diagnostic criteria of the current diagnostic and statistical manual of
mental disorders."
There is no argument that 7.34.3.8C3 is nowhere in the statutory grant of authority. See
FF 25-29,36-39. This makes sense given the context and purpose of the Act. The problem with
this provision and the implementation of it in the Department's forms is that it goes beyond
verification and intrudes into the treatment of patient and the doctor patient relationship. This is a
critical difference. The Court finds helpful this discussion by the New Yark Courts in the context
20
In order to maintain an action to recover damages ansmg from medical
malpractice, a doctor-patient relationship is necessary (see, Lee v. City of New
York, 162 A.D.2d 34, 560 N.Y.S.2d 700; Murphy v. Blum, 160 A.D.2d 914, 554
N.Y.S.2d 640; Hickey v. Travelers Ins. Co., 158 A.D.2d 112, 558 N.Y.S.2d 554;
Fraser v. Brunswick Hosp. Med. Center, 150 A.D.2d 754, 542 N.Y.S.2d 204).
This relationship is created when professional services are rendered and accepted
by another person for purposes of medical or surgical treatment and may be based
either on an express or implied contract (see, Lee v. City of New York, supra ). In
general, this relationship is not formed when a doctor examines a patient solely
for purposes of rendering an evaluation for an employer or potential employer
(see, e.g., Lee v. City of New York, supra [firefighter's physical exam]; Murphy v.
Blum, supra [Workers' Compensation claim]; Hickey v. Travelers Ins. Co., supra
[Workers' Compensation claim]; LoDico v. Caputi, 129 A.D.2d 361, 517
N.Y.S.2d 640 [Workers' Compensation claim]). However, an important exception
to this rule occurs when the examining doctor causes further injury by either
affirmatively treating the patient or affirmatively advising the patient as to a
course of treatment (see, Lee v. City of New York, supra; Hickey v. Travelers
Ins. Co., supra; LoDico v. Caputi, supraLicht v. Hohl Mach. & Conveyor Co.,
158 A.D.2d 1000, 551 N.Y.S.2d 149).
Heller v. Peekskill Cmty. Hosp., 198 A.D.2d 265, 265-66, 603 N.Y.S.2d 548, 549-50 (1993)
Here, the Department of Health is requiring a physician first of all to try and understand
what "standard treatments" are, and if they can do that, they must exhaust those standard
treatments. In the case of PTSD it might be other prescription drugs. This is exactly what Dr.
Kieve rightly objected to, and is what is beyond the authority of the Department to require .
Finally, as Dr. Kieve correctly testified NMAC 7.34.3.8(C)(4) and its correlative requirements
on the forms that the practioner attest that "the potential risks and benefits of the use of medical
cannabis for the condition have been discussed with the patient" covers that concern without
mandating an exhaustion of those treatment. See FF 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16. This is bolstered by
21
The Legislature clearly intended to leave it to the practitioner the determination of whether or not
medical cannabis is proper for the patient with or without other alternative or with or without
exhausting other "standard treatments." See also, NM Admin. Code 7.34.3 DD. In fact by doing
so even seems that the Department is contradicting its own instruction that the patient client
relationship resides with the certifying practitioner not the state. See NMAC supra (stating: (3) In
relationship with the applicant or qualified patient, and shall conduct an in-person physical or
This Court will tum finally to Plaintiffs second request that this Court invalidate the
Department's requirement that medical records be provided verifying diagnosis of PTSD at the
time the application is made. See Complaint, Plaintiffs Findings and Conclusions. Again, based
on the cases cited above it is clear the Legislature such authority through a verification stating:
The certification must include in statement in a patient's records, and the statute nowhere else
limits the Department to verifying a diagnosis AFTER rather than CONCURRENT WITH the
application. Plaintiffs request for relief is DENIED in this regard. See NMSA 1978, § 26-2B-
7(B).
22
VI. Legal Conclusions
A. Judge Sarah M. Singleton in her July 31, 2014 Order dispensed with the standing
issue. "The Court finds that Dr. Kieve lacks standing to assert the claims that are the subject of
this case on her behalf, but that Dr. Kieve holds third-party standing to assert the claim stated in
B. Nothing has changed regarding Dr. Kieve's standing. Not only does she have
standing to assert the claim on behalf of her patients but she has shown a concrete injury to
herself by the Department's insistence that she exhaust treatment remedies with her patient
before she is able to certify that patient's application to the program. See FF I, 13-18,30
C. The Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 26-2B-1 to -7 ("the
D. The purpose of the Act is "to allow the beneficial use of medical cannabis in a
regulated system for alleviating symptoms caused by debilitating medical conditions and their
medical treatments."
E. The Act charges the Department with regulation of the medical cannabis program.
F. The Act specifies that the Department "shall issue" a patient card to a patient
a. a written certification,
c. the name, address and telephone number of the patient's practitioner, and
d. the name, address and date of birth of the patient's primary caregiver, if any.
23
G. The Act provides that "the Department may deny an application only if the
applicant did not provide the information required pursuant to N.M. Stat. Ann. § 26-2B-7(B) or
H. The Act grants the Department the authority to add, by regulation, additional
J. When an applicant applies to the program with the qualifying condition of PTSD,
the Department requires that supporting medical records confirming the diagnosis be submitted
with the application. Requesting medical records "verifying" the diagnosis are within the scope
K. When an applicant applies to the program under PTSD, the Department requires
that their certifying practitioner attest that "standard treatments have failed to bring adequate
relief." This is beyond the scope of the Department of Health's authority under the Act.
certifications to attest that "standard treatments have failed to bring adequate relief." This is
M. There is statutory authority that allows the Department to require that patients
include medical records with their applications for patient identification cards if it is limited to
medical records by patients applying to the program with PTSD beyond what is permitted in
paragraph M.
24
0. Any proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law not consistent with this
IT IS ORDERED:
P. There is no statutory authority for the Department to require that a PTSD patient's
certifying practitioner attest that "standard treatments have failed to bring adequate relief' as a
condition of approving an application. The Department may not impose this requirement.
Q. As part of an initial application for a patient card, the Department may require
from patients and their practitioners no more information that what is included in NMSA 1978 §
support of a patient's application, but the Department may not require that the "written
certification" contain any information or attestation that is not expressly required by the Act or as
S. The Department may request at the certification stage medical records from a
patient and/or a patient's practitioner only 1) to verify the truthfulness of the patient's
application, and/or 2) if the Department has reason to believe that the patient has submitted false
information.
O~dL
HONORABLE DAVID K. THOMSON
District Judge, Division VI
Entered 4/29/2015
25
.... .Enrollment/.Ke.,,enroument. Medical «.;erttttcation J:t
~o.rnt .~ ...,..... _ .
NEW·MEXICO
Please print cleorly and en.sure applicationis complete. lncompleteor illegibleapplicationsor applicationswith
DEPARTMENTOF missingdocwnentswill delay processing.Incompleteapplications.will be kept on file for six monthsfromthe
•UEl[TD
D I ft i L-dat
- e_r_ec
forms _e_iv_ed
must _have
b_y_th
_e_p_ro
_gram
original__ __ r s_ix
;_afte
signatures. _be
_v_o
_ m_o-n-ths-it_wt_·1_1
Photocopies, faxed _ided
and andanewcopies
electronic applicationmust
will not be be submitted.All
accepted.
C Huntington's Disease
□ Parkinson's disease
Written certification MUSTbe provided pursuantto theLynn& Erin CompasslonoJeUseAct of 2007,medicalprovidermustcertifyand answerthe
foJlowingquestionsas well as provide medical records, diagnostic notes, or signed letter regarding treatment and diagnosis.
By signing below you are certifying,that based on your In person examination of the patient, the patient's condition Is:
• Chronicand debilitating )dv es □ No
• Youhave discussed the potential risks and benefits with the patient and benefits outweigh risk J.!!e s □ No
• Standard Treatments have failed to bring adequate relief j{ves □ No
• If requested you can provide records that reflect history and treatment of diagnosis. 'jt<es□ No
For re-enrollments,the provider must re-certifythat the patient',medicalconditionstill warrantsthe use of medicalcan~~ by selectingthe
answer that applies. Doyou belleve this personstillmeets the ellelbllltyrequirementsfor the MedicalCannabisProgram?~Yes □ No
ProviderName: Lf\'(el 1--'""-''-- _______ Patient in your care for bow long? -=
bJ~'-""'i+=-..:;...
__ _
ProviderEmail: --.:== I<,,,../
l
~,:i~::d~~!~' ~~~eflPeclelty: ~ :--':::
~~p-'-c::H~e-; ~ """'...,.~..,...
MailingAddress:---:~ ~~:::t::"=,.......-;-:;r::--...,.-;;-:-,; ;::;;:-- -;; ___________ State: NM_ZlpCode: ___ _
7
Provider Telephone N
NM Medical License fl:
NM ControlledSubstanceLicense#:
Date:
(Must be dated wl
3 J~{
m!IY 9 days of program reeelpt)
__,ite Chart Created: _____ _ 0 Approved □ Not Approved MedicalCann EXHIBIT ofBaHh
Medical Director Signature:____________ _ Date: __ _ 1190St. Fra 87502
MCP Coordinator/Man.ager Signature:_________ _ Date:__ _
1 1 Page2
Enrollment/Re-enrollmentMedical CertificationForm
with
Pleaseprintclearlyand ensureapplicationis complete.Incompleteor illegibleapplicationsor applications
missingdocumentswilldelayproGeSSing. Incomplete applications
willbe kepton fileforsixmonthsfromthe
datereceivedby the program; aftetsix monthsit willbe voidedand a newapplicationmust be submiltld.All
fonns must haveoriginalsignatures.Photoeoples,faxedand electroniccopieswill not he accepted.
WriUcn ccrtlOcotion MUST be provldeel pursuant to the Lynn& Erin Comptusionate UseAct of 2007,medicalprovidermustcertifyand~r the
followingqu~ooi; as well asprovidemedicalrecords,diagnosticnotes,or signedletterregardingtreatmentand diagnosis.
Doyou certifythat this person's quallfylngmedicalc;ondltlonIs debllltatlng? ~_; □· No Provider'sl~ltl~~ · ··
Doyou certifytha.tthe potential risksand benefits of the use of medicalcannabisfor the conditionhave been dlse1.1ssed withthe patient?~
)(ves D No Provider's1n1t1als
Do you certifyth~t standard treatments have faUedto bring adequate rellen ,~es D No Provider's Initials
Have you attached medicalrecords,diagnosticnotes, or ether records
Where are patient recordskept? Office_ Other (explalo)-+ty).>CA.,.~""""-"~
of¥3!'.'1~t?,,....-'."::"
-= :..:...-'-1~....;::;'-"-'-"-""'-f_ __
.)i4.::J.es□ No Provider'slottl~ls
___ ___ ___ _
For re-enrollments, the provider must re-certify that the patient's medicalcondition~till wan-ants the use or medical eannabiJ by selectingthe
answer that applies 110d l11itialing. r-n/'I
Doyou believe this person still muets the ellglblRtyrequirementsfor the MedicalCannabisProgram? ~es □ No Provider'sInitial~_ ..,
..., ,;
{v-. ~=:===
===
====== Patient In your care fo~ bow long? (o / t ~ / 1Z..
_ _ __ _ Bojlrd Certified ~eclalty: l§<.IC-klta.fvv\
_ ,:_;::.._......--,--:~ ....a..;.-.;;..;_ ,.__.:....:..:.________ city: L,,llS veoet.~State:tii i:f-ro,
zipCodc\
---,- -=-----=-____;:;.,,--=
--,,..,.-~.-,.., ,-:;;:o.-:::--::-City:· Statu tiM_ Zip Code:___ _
..,_........,"'--Second Telephone N
DEA License #:
a.
Medical Director Signature: Date: -, ll90 St; F 87505
MCP Coordinat~t/Manager Signature: Ovv-J
e=: 7 Date: '-1- \ j "'\)
1 age2
Revised 4/20/2013
Pleasereturnthisformwithmissing
documentation.
o+i'c-e_
Dear P11.tiertt
Applicant,
Thnnk you for applyingto the MedicalCannabisProgrum. Throughthe ndntioistrntivereviewprocess, it has beendeterminedthat
your applicationis incomplete. We willcontinueprocessingyour applicationprocesswhen Iboinformationrequestedbelowhasbeon
received. The progrnin cannot nccept Items vin email or fox nnd nUmedlcnl 1·ecordsmust be within tho 111st
12 months.
0 Cl~ilrcopy ofNM Photo LO. (Driver's license or NM StnteID Cnrd)- Mustbe a copy of the permanentNM PhotoI.D.- Temporary/
Extension I.D. or licensesare not accepted,)
D Information 1·egnrdlngcllngnosls
D To qualify widerSevere ChronicPninyou need hvo certifications,oneof whichmust bo Conna specialistwithexpertisein pnin
managementor expertisein the process that is causingthe severe chronicpnin.
0 To apply under InflammatoryAutoiminul\e-MediatedArthritis,:yourcertificationmustbe froma rheumntologist.
D To apply undorGlauoomn:the diagnosismust be mnd.oby on ophtltalmologlst.
0 To apply underPainful PeripheralNeuropo,U1y : Medico!Recordsmust be submittedwith diagnosis.
D To apply un<krPTSD: You must providen letteror recordsfrom o:psycWntristor psychintricnursepractitionerthntconfinn
diagnosisnndprovide nu updnteort how yolt nr&doingund.er cutTOnttreatment.
'm Clinicalnotes, diagnosticnotes, or currentmedicaldocumentsare required.o {;.,P.$#rtt',1~ ~~ ~
D After consultingwith your certifyingmedicalproviderand/orreviewingthe medi tlI'ecofas i~ji:~ that you are not
~ible under' the conditionyou listed.
1f,,Providedocumentationof medicntionsor stnndardtrentmentsthat havefuiled. ~ ~ ~ f
0 Enrollment Forms/MeclicnlCertificntiou fo1•n1s/Mcdicnl Practitioners Notes ~ (/
D EnrollmentInformationFonn w1isnot complete
D Applicant did not sign nnd/or dnte the fonn.
D Medical Certificationor Medical PractitionerNotesfonn was not complete/NeedsPhysicalcxnmor mentalstntusnotes,
D Missingmedicalprovider contact informntion
D Certifyingru1d/or contributiugmedicalprnctiliont:r(s)providing recordsmust be licensedin New Mexicoand musthave II curte11t
NewMexico ControlledSubstaacc:s License.
0 Release oflnformntlon for nil contributing n1edlcnlpractitioners.
~Not ·
I 3
NEW
,:MEXIC0
~Patient _Re-enrollment
Dear PatientApplicant,
Thankyou for applyingto the MedicalCaMabis Program. Throughthe administrativereviewprocess,it has been determinedthatyour
applicationfs incomplete. We will continueprocwiag yourapplicationprocesswhen the informationrequestedbelowhas been-~ved.
ne program-cannot accept items via email or fax and all medicalrecords mast be within the last 12 months.
D Clear copyofNM PhotoID. (Driver's Licenseor NM StateID Card) - Must be a copy of the permanentNM PhotoLD,- Temporary/
ExtensionI.D. or liceascs
are not accepted.)
0 InformaUon Tegardlng·dla.gnosls
G To quolil'funder ·severeChronicPein you need hvo certifications,one ofwhiob mustbe from a pain managementspecialist
0 To npplyunderInflammatoryAutoimmune-MediatedArthritis,yourocrtificationmostbe .froma rbeumntologist · ·-··
D To apply underGlaucoma:the dingno~ismust be madeby an opbthalmologis1.
0 To applyunder PainfulPeripheralNeuropathy:MedicalRecordsmustbe submittedwith diagnosis.
0 To apply underPTSD:You must providea letteror recordsfrom a psychiatrist.orpsyi::hiatrlcnursepractitionerthalconfirm
_ ~lfgnosis and providean update on bow youore doingundercur.re·nt trea~ . _. r
,1, .-Li . .,..
~1 cal Dotes,diagnosticno,tes,or currentmedicaldocumenlS are required.'t1],f1sJe 01~ '-~ ~
col1$Ultingwith your certifyingmedicalproviderand/orrevi.ewinglhe medicalrecordsit has been_aetenmned that you are not
undecthe conditionyou listed. \ (\. {~ ~ Q ~ () ~'/SJ ''(4., , •
de documentation·ofmedicationsor standardtreatmentsthathavefailed. \) I
0 Enrollment.Forms/Medical
Certificationforms/Medical
~ctitioners Notes
D Enrollme~finformation·Fonn was not complete
0 -AppU~t -didnot signand/ordate the fonn.
0 MedicalCertificatibnForm was not complete
D Missing inedical
providercontact information
0 Ce11ifyingand/orcontributingmedicalpractitioner(s)providingrecordsmustbe licensedin New Moxko and musthavea cunent
New MexicoControlledSubstancesLicense.
0 Release of Information for all contributing medical practitioners,
D Patient Production Licenn Application Form
0 Incomplete,all seclionsmustbe completed
D Not enoughdetail.each sectionmust be answeredin detail,
D J'_mofofho~eltgJ.~jncom~is fequlrodbut wnsnot submittedwith yournpplicntion.Youmust provide11.copy:of.youthf?Wehold
federal ln.xreturn. Ifyourfiousehold does itol·file federal taxeirprovidea storementregardinghow 1114ilY
peoplelive in your household,
and what is your total monthlyhouseholdincome.
D A $30 fee ls requlr.edbut was not submittedwithYoutapplicalion.
D Addresson 8J)l?liOation differsfrom addresson file. You mustprovideproof you ownpro~tty ot that it is youri,rimaryresidence.
· This can be fn,the fomi oh deed, utilitybtll, or-a certifiedcopyof.youdense agreement,
0 Notes:
I l/ (
.. -·····..,··•....,u,1uauon 11or .ar-"""'I
rl c-.iseprint r lcnrly 11
nd ensure opplicntion15compkle. lnco111p h:1cor llltg iblc lica
ini.-isingd cumcnlswill delay proct:SS ing. lncornplcltappli~nlions willbe kepi M fr c
dale rcccivcd by 1h1:pros,am: n.ftcr~ill1nun1hsii will be voided1111d a new npplicalion sl b b
fornrnmust ha,,c originnlsir,nalun;.s . Photocopi~s , r:i.tell nnd clectrnnic copic~will not be ncc~p:c;J.
0 Copy of New Mexico ID or Driver's License Atta.cbed. (This must be o perm:rncnt ID; the p~grm:; cusmo! o::cc.:;,
The following information is optional ond is used for sliltistienl purposes only:
_ Hispanic While VAmerican Indian Black or Afl'ican/Amcriea11 Asi n
Nati c Hawaiian/Pnoifio Islander Other
T!:,, pf';y·:;.:,:d 1:dt r, ":JS pr.;. ·:d::-1b2/i1u: musr' /;c yuur primnry pliy.)·j::d trs:rlew:,i 0,1d ,:,i.'I epp ~.e:· •' , -~ ·,::-::::~'!::!,:: :.. ,. i
il-!b.J~,,
··.' t·: t:_i)j;,,~•li: -. a,u·chcn;;2 uf address uu1.s1be repari ••d, i:, ,,r itiu.t~. 1.1,; ..rr t:jj~·..~ ::·!J·:,•:., '.', i ·.-,
. Or. .·e a11p.r:;-:er.,
calcndur 1/11ys.
Me1.Jicnl
Provider', Nam ccoodaty MedlcalProl·lderName:
Q.C1{C)\Q Y.,~\le_ _____ ~------ - -- -
Medical Provider's Office Address: MedicalProvider'sOffice Address:
_\\oDO J..&io._~-J'.',ld~ C#\lo
so.a-to.~e. '1M o1S-eit I
O;,signing below, I cenify thal all the infonnationsubmittedis completeand correct. {olso aeknnwledgl! that ( h:ivc
r~•c.l:ind will abide by the limitationsand restrictionson my right to use nnd possess.tncdical cannal.li:,ns !:>Wtcj in the
.y1mand Erin Compassionate Use Act and in NewMexicoAdministrativeCode7.34.3, the full text can be foundon
~\ • t 1 1 •. , ,, .. ~
_,_. _ _. t:,.,_ .•
EXHIBIT
I
(Ua1e)
NMDOH~S~ ON V
·=====
..~=
__
,__
·-. ·'..·-
l\lcdic I nn11:ihisProuram • Ni\1 O~ptirtrncm orll~:illh
f.'c,New l\1ctico 11;;;05
J t'lO SI. Fn111dsDri\'t', S3400 • $1111111
(50!1\1127-2311
PageI
-- ---~- .. -..-..'-cu '\..,~J uucanon Jl·orm
1'4CVV IVltJ\lGU Please print clearly and ensure nppl!cntlonis complete. Incompleteor illegibleopplicationsor applications with
DEPARTMENTOF missing uocumcnlSwill delay processing. Incompleteapplicationswill be kept on file for six months from the
H..
HEA[J hove original__
_d_a_•e_n:_·c_c_lv_c_<l_b_y_l_he-pro_gram
fom\Sm11s1 s_i_x_m_o_n-1l_is_
signatures.
;_n_n_c_r i_tw_lll_b_c_v_o_id_cd_an_d_n_n_e
Photocopies, fn cd and electronic_
wcopies
_o_p_p_lic_a_t_io_n_m_u
will not _s_
bet _b e_s_u_b_m_i_lle_d_
11cccpt,J. ._A_I_I
-~
Wril:ti:n ccr1lficot1011M IJS'T be prn, ·idcd pursuant 10 lhc l;m11& Erin Compo.sslo11ate Use Acl o/2007, medical provider musLcertify and nnswcr tl1e
following,qucs1io11 .sns well us pro,·ide meditnl n:cnrtls, diagnostic notes, or sigJJcdlelttr rcgordingtrcalmcnl w1ddlugtiosis.
Do you certrfythat this po~on's qualifying medical condition Is debllltatlng? 'rnYes O No Provider's Initial~
Do y,. a,rtlly Iha! d,o P<>tenllI ,blu aad b,oonuol tha "" of modlul <O~bl• to, tho eond"1"" ha,o ,;;n dl"""'d with tho pollen~
.J9 Yes O No Provider's lnltlal~
For re-enrollments, the provl(lcr muJt rc-ccrllr) •111111lhc patient's medicnl condition still warrants tht un or medkal cannabis by selecting the
answer thnt uppli s 11ndtnit1111ing.
Do you bcllellathis person 5tlll meel:5the ollglbllltvrequlr emenl.s for the Medical Cannabis Program? □ Yes O No Pro111der'5Initials __
The NewMc.~kdDcp111tmcn1 ofHe11llh.Medi"! CannabisProgramwill ~erifythe lnformetion providedwithinJOdny$ofn:ceivi:ngo full 111dcomplc:tc appliution.
V«ificationor mc-d1calinfcmnatiDllmayinclude,wllhpatientconstn l, cJCllntinatlon
of medical rc:cordsdocumenting
!hepnlicnlhas n cum:nldingnosls of o deblliUlling
mcdi.cal condhlon,Cmificsion mw1 be:providedby a prnditioner as delinedin Scdion3 of the l>m &. Erir,Compcml011a1e U# AcJof 2001,"11per,cn licensed In New
Mexicoto prescribenndadministerdrunslhlllrue5ubjcctto the ControlledSubstancesML By signingbelow you an: nllcstinglhnt your prlmlll')'pla~ r pmcllu Is within
M
13 .. __NOV
,.._
12 2013
--~---... --
tX Il,;0 1 P-lt_lL5_c_p_ri_nt_c_h:_ar_
l'Jt VVIVI ly_an_d
_en_s_ur_c_ap_p_li_cu_li-on_i_s_co_m_p_
lc-le-.-ln_c_o
m_p
_lc_t_c
-or_l_llc
_g_
lb-lc_n_p-p
l-ico-t-io_n_s
o-r-n-pp
- l-ica_1
_ln_n_\_Vi_LI)_--,
OF missingdocumentswilldeluy procc:ssing.lncomplttc uppllcu.tionswill be kept on meforsiit mon1hsfromthe
DEPARTMENT
datt rccoived by theprogram;afier six monthsit will be voided nnd a new 11pp lic-atlo11must be sulimittcd.A ll
HEALi formsmu~"I haveoriginal signuturcs.l' llotocopies, faxed :ind electronic opics will not be :\ccc1lled.
This form is completed by the certifying mcdk:il prnctitioncr and inc luded witb all applications.
A the certifying practitioner, is it your professional opiflionthat the potential health benefits of the medical use of cannabis would likely
outweigh he Ithrisks for this patient?
JJ'Yes □ No
for renewal, is the patient maintaining or improving on crumabis? Please Describe:
Recommendationsfor ongoi1igtreatment:
Medical Cannabis Program to discuss my medical condition, including treatment records, test results
and evaluations specific to PT6}) wilh my
(PleasePrint Qul\llfylng Mcdlcnl ConnoblsCondition)
I understand that I may revoke this release at any tiruc. I also unders~andthat if I wish to revoke th.isauthorization,
I m\lst do so in writing Lo the Medical Cannabis Program Coordinator, nnd that revocation may result in the
inabiLityof the program to c rtify me as a Medical Cnnnabis Program participant. Additionally, I understand that
the revocation willnot apply to information that has ulready been released in response to lhfa ctuthorization. The
infonnation disclosed pursu.o.ntto the aulhori.zation is subject to potential re-disdosure by the recipient, and will not
be prate ted by lh HfP AA privacy rule. I understand that lbis disclosure is voluntary and that signing this form is
not necessary in order to receive treatment from the Department of Health. 11,i r lease is required, however, to
verify my eligibility for the Medical. Cannabis Program.
By signing tbjs release, l certify that 1 run aware that the program may provide verification of my enrollment and
personal production license stalus with law enforcement; but only for the purpose of verifying that a person is
lawfu!Iy enrolled in the medical cannabis program, or in I.heevent thut the medical cannabis program manager or
dcsignee has renson to believe lhat a qualified patienl or patient-applicant may have violnted an applicable law or
failed to adhere to Department of Health regulations. /
Participant Signature or Personal Represent.alive:
Print Name:
Please do not send us original medical records; we will not be able to mail them back to you.
D For Chronic Pain, for initial enrollmentthe certificationmust be signedby a specialistin pain
managementor expertisein the conditioncausing the pain, For renewal applications,the certification
may be signed by a primary care provider.
D If you wish to produce your own medical cannabis, submit a separate applicationfor a patient Personal
ProductionLicense (PPL). This must be completedannuallyor if any infonnation changes, such as
location, security, etc.
••PLEASE NOTE: OUR APPLICATIONPROCESSINGTIME IS 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE WE RECEIVE
THE COMPLETEAPPLICATION. IF YOU HAVE NOT RECEIVEDANYTHING40 DAYS AFTER
SUBMITTINGYOUR APPLICATION,PLEASE CONTACTOUR OFFICE••
EXHIBIT
Revised2/27/2015 I G
Enrollment/Re-enrollment Information Form
NEW
MEXI
CQ,--P-le_as_e-pnn-.
-t-cl-ear_l
_y_an_d
_en
_ s_ur
_e_a_pp_li_'ca-ti-on-is
-co_m_p_le_te_. -ln-co_m_p
_le_te_o_r _ill_egi
_ b_l_e
a-p-pli-.
c-ati
-.o_ns_o_r
-app
- li-ca_ti_ons
- Wl
-.th
--,
DEPARTMENT
OF missingdocumentswill delayprocessing.Incompleteapplicationswill be kept on file for six months from the
HEA[JH _ forms
~ must
da_te_r-ec-ehave
-iv_ed_b original
_y_th signatures.
_e_p_ro_gr_am
_________
and electronic copies will not be b-e
accepted.
_b_e_v-oi-ded_an_d_a_n_ew_a-pp-li-ca_ti_on_m_us_t
-s-ub_tn1
___,ExpirationDate: ____
_·tt
_ed_ . All
--~
D Copy of New Mexico ID or Driver's License Attached. (This must be a permanent ID; the program cannot accept
Temporaryor ExtensionID)
Applicant First Name: ________ _ __ Last: _____________ Middle:___ _
Date of Birth (Month/Day/Year):____________ _
The following information is optional and is used for statistical purposes only:
_ Hispanic White American Indian Black or African/American Asian
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Other
Thephysical addressprovided below must be your primary physical residence and will appear on your patient card
subject to approvaL
Once approved, any change of address must be reported, in writing, to our office within ten (10) calendar days.
Is the address below a change of address from previous year applications? __ Yes __ No
Physical Address:----------------------------------
City: _____________ County:_________ Zip: _____ _
By signing below, I certify that all the information submitted is complete and correct. I also acknowledge that I have
read and will abide by the limitations and restrictions on my right to use and possess medical cannabis as stated in the
Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act and in New Mexico Administrative Code 7.34.3,the full text can be found on
the program website at: nmhealth.org/go/mcp
(ApplicantSignature) (Date)
THE ENROLLMENT/RE-ENROLLMENT MEDICAL CERTIFICATION FORM MUST BE COMPLETED IN FULL BY THE MEDICAL PROVIDER.
i NMDOHUSEONLY
i
Date Chart Created: ______ Revtewed By: _____ _ Medical Cannabis Program• NM Department of Health
PPL Appllcadon Attached: _YES _NO 1190 St. Frandl Drive, S3400 • Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505
(~05) 827-2321
Page 1
Revised2/27/2015
Enrollment/Re-enrollment Medical Certification Form
NEWMEXICOPlease print clearly and ensure applicationis complete. Incomplete or illegible applications or applicatioJ!liwith
missing documents will delay processing. Incomplete applications will be kept on .filefor six months from the
l'JH
DEPARTMENT OF
HEA
L _ ...._
da
_ te_r-ece
forms
Last: _____________
_o_n-ths-it_Wl
. Photocopies, _·faxed
_n_b_e_v_and
o_id
_e_electronic
d_an
_d_ a_n_ew
-copies
ap
_p_li_·c-ati
_·o
will_nnot
_m
_ :u~
st_b_
be
Middle Initial:
e_s-ub_ID1
accepted._ .tted
_ ._All
__ __.
For re-enrollments, the provider molt re-certify that the patient's medical condition still warrants the use of medical cannabil by selecting th
ana,nr that applies. Do you believe this person still meets the ellglbllltyrequirements for the MedicalCannabis Program? □ Yes □ No
The New Mexico Department of Health, Medical Cannabis Program will verify the information provided within 30 days of receiving a full and complete
applicatlo.n. Verification of medical information roay include, with patient consent, examination of medical records documenting the patient has a current
diagnosis of a debilitating medical condition. Certification must be provided by a practitioner as defined in Section 3 of the Lynn & Erin Compassionate
UseAct of 2007, "a person licensed in New Me.xico to prescribe and administer drugs that are subject to the ControlledSubstancesAct." By signing
below you are attesting that your primary place of practi.ce is within the State of New Mexico. Further you are certifying patient eligioility for enrollment
in the New ~ exico Departmentof Health Medical CannabisProgram and agreeing to have patient medical records audited as necessary.
Provider Name: _ ______________________ Patient In your care for how long? _______ _
Provider Email: _____________________ _
Provider Clinical Licensure (MD, DO, NP, PA, etc,): Board Certified Specialty: ___ __ _____ _ _
Office Address: __ __ ___________ __ City: __ _ ______ _ State:~ Zip Code: ___ _
Mailing Address: City: State: Zip Code: ___mn... _
Provider Telephone Number: Second Telephone Number: _______________ _
NM Medical License#: DEA Licenae #: ____ ___ _________ _
NM Controlled Substance License#: __ __ ___________ _
i NMDOBUSEONLY
I
Date Chart Created: ______ _ □ Approved □ Not Approved Medical Cannabis Program • NM Department of Health
Medical Dlreetor Signature: _____________ _ Date: __ _ 1190 St, Francis Drive, S3400 • Santa F■i NM 8750!1
MCP Coordinator/Manager Signature: _________ _ Date: __ _ (505) 827-2321
Page2
Revised 2/27/2015
Medical Provider Clinical/Diamosti .c Notes Form
NEWMEXICOPleaseprint clearlyand ensureapplicationis complete.Incompleteor illegibleapplicationsor applicationswith
DEPARTMENT OF missingdocumentswill delayprocessing. Incompleteapplicationswill be kept on file for six monthsfrom the
[J H....
HEA _da
_te
_ re_must
forms ce
_i_ve_have
d_b_y_th
_e_p-ro_gram
original__ ;_a_fte
_r_s_ix
signatures. _m
_o_n_th_s_it_wi
Photocopies, _·fu:ed
_n_b_e_vo
_i-ded
and _electronic
an
_ d_a_new
This form must be completed by the certifying medical practitioner and included with all application .
--coples
ap_p_li_cwill
a_ti_on_not
_ us
m _t_b_
be e -su_b_mt
accepted. _·tte
_ d_.Al
_ l _ __..
Have you attached medical records, diagnostic notes, or other records of treatment? □ Yes □ No
Where are patient records kept? Office__ Other (explain) _____ _ ________________ _ _
i NMDOHUSE ONLY
i
Medical Cannabil Program• NM Departmentof Health
1190 St. FranciaDrive, S3400 • Santa Fe, NM 87505
(505) 827-2321
Page 3
Revised2/27/2015
Release of Information Form
NEW
MEXI
CQ,--P-le_as_e_pnn-.-t-cl-ear
_l_y_an_d_en
_ s_ur_e_ap
_p_li_ca_ti_on_ i_s-co_mp_le_te_.
In
- co-mp
- let<,
_ o_r -ill-egi
-.b-le_ a_pp_li_'
c-ati-
.o-ns_o_r
-ap_p_li_ca_ti_ons
_ wi_'th
- -,
DEPARTMENT
OF missing documentswill delay processing.Incompleteapplicationswill be kept on file for six months from the
HEA[JH forms
~ d-
ate must
_ r_e_ have
ce-iv-ed original
_ b_y_th
_ e_p signatures.
_ro_gram;
__ Photocopies,
· _aft_e_r s_ix
_m_o
_n_th_s-it_wifaxed
_ b_e_v_and
_·11 o1-·d_eelectronic
_ d_ a n_e_wcopies
d_an will·on
_a-pp_li_·ca-ti--not be b
m-us-t-accepted.
e- s-ub_nu
_·_tted
_ . All-- ~
Medical Cannabis Program to discuss my medical condition, including treatment records, test results and
I understand that I may revoke this release at any time. I also understand that ifl wish to revoke this authorization, I
must do so in writing to the Medical Cannabis Program Coordinator, and that revocation may result in the inability
of the program to certify me as a Medical Cannabis Program participant. Additionally, I understand that the
revocation will not apply to information that has already been released in response to this authorization. The
information disclosed pursuant to the authorization is subject to potential re-disclosure by the recipient, and will not
be protected by the HIP AA privacy rule. I understand that this disclosure is voluntary and that signing this form is
not necessary in order to receive treatment from the Department of Health. This release is required, however, to
verify my eligibility for the Medical Cannabis Program.
By signing this release, I certify that I am aware that the program may provide verification of my enrollment and
personal production license status with law enforcement; but only for the purpose of verifying that a person is lawfully
enrolled in the medical cannabis program, or in the event that the medical cannabis program manager or designee has
reason to believe that a qualified patient or patient-applicant may have violated an applicable law or failed to adhere
to Department of Health regulations.
If this form is signed by a personal representative, rather than the applicant a witness other than the personal
representative must sign below:
N. M. S. A. 1978, § 26-2B-1
Effective:July 1, 2007
Currentness
Sections 1 through 7 of this act may be cited as the "Lynn and Erin CompassionateUse Act" in honor of Lynn Pierson and
Erin Armstrong.
Credits
Addedby L. 2007, Ch. 210, § 1, eff. July 1, 2007.
End of Document © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
EXHIBIT
I
V✓estlawNe.xt:' © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works
§ 26-2B-2. Purpose of act, NM ST § 26-2B-2
N. M. S. A. 1978, § 26-2B-2
Effective:July 1, 2007
Currentness
in a regulated
The purpose of the Lynn and Erin CompassionateUse Act is to allow the beneficialuse of medical cannabis
system for alleviatingsymptomscausedby debilitatingmedicalconditionsand their medicaltreatments.
Credltl
Addedby L. 2007, Ch. 210, § 2, eff. July 1, 2007.
End of Document Cl 2014 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
'Nestlaw Nexr © 2014 Thomson Rec1ters No claim to original US. Government Work.s
§ 28-2B-3. Definitions, NM ST § 26-2B-3
N. M. S. A. 1978, § 26-2B-3
§ 26-2B-3. Definitions
Effective:July 1, 2007
Currentness
B. "debilitatingmedicalcondition"means:
(1) cancer;
(2) glaucoma;
(4) damageto the nervoustissue of the spinal cord, with objectiveneurologicalindicationof intractablespasticity;
(5) epilepsy;
D. "licensed producer" means any person or association of persons within New Mexico that the department determinesto
be qualified to produce, possess, distribute and dispense cannabis pursuant to the Lynn and Erin CompassionateUse Act
and that is licensed by the department;
E. ''practitioner" means a person licensed in New Mexico to prescribe and administerdrugs that are subject to the Controlled
SubstancesAct;
F. ''primary caregiver" means a resident of New Mexico who is at least eighteen years of age and who bas been designated
by the patient's practitioner as being necessary to take responsibilityfor managing the well-being of a qualified patient with
respect to the medical use of cannabis pursuant to the provisions of the Lynn and Erin CompassionateUse Act;
G. "qualified patient" means a resident of New Mexico who bas been diagnosed by a practitioner as having a debilitating
medical condition and bas received written certification and a registry identification card issued pursuant to the Lynn and
Erin CompassionateUse Act; and
H. "written certification" means a statement in a patient's medical records or a statement signed by a patient's practitioner
that, in the practitioner'sprofessional opinion, the patient has a debilitatingmedical condition and the practitionerbelieves
that the potential health benefits of the medical use of cannabis would likely outweigh the health risks for the patient. A
written certificationis not valid for more than one year from the date of issuance.
Credits
Added by L. 2007, Ch. 210, § 3, eff. July 1, 2007.
-l/9s i Next <c ,c 1 Th ,n n Ro ,toi I\, arrrl c, ngma S o.., rrma• I Wor s 2
§ 26-2B-4. Exemption from criminal and civil penalties for the ..., NM ST § 26-2B-4
N. M. S. A. 1978, § 26-2B-4
§ 26-2B-4. Exemption from criminal and civil penalties for the medical use of cannabis
A. A qualifiedpatient shall not be subject to arrest,prosecutionor penalty in any manner for the possessionof or the medical
use of cannabisif the quantityof cannabisdoes not exceedan adequatesupply.
C. SubsectionA of this sectionshall not apply to a qualifiedpatient under the age of eighteenyears, unless:
( 1) the qualifiedpatient's practitionerhas explainedthe potential risks and benefits of the medical use of cannabisto the
qualifiedpatient and to a parent, guardianor person having legal custodyof the qualifiedpatient; and
(c) controlthe dosageand the frequencyof the medicaluse of cannabisby the qualifiedpatient.
D. A qualifiedpatient or a primarycaregivershall be grantedthe full legal protectionsprovidedin this sectionif the patient or
caregiveris in possessionof a registry identificationcard. If the qualifiedpatient or primary caregiveris not in possessionof
a registry identificationcard, the patient or caregivershall be given an opportunityto produce the registry identificationcard
before any arrest or criminalchargesor other penaltiesare initiated.
E. A practitionershall not be subject to arrest or prosecution,penalized in any manner or denied any right or privilege for
recommendingthe medicaluse of cannabis or providingwritten certificationfor the medicaluse of cannabispursuantto the
Lynn and Erin CompassionateUse Act.
F. A licensed producer shall not be subject to arrest, prosecutionor penalty, in any manner, for the production,possession,
distributionor dispensingof cannabispursuantto the Lynn and Erin CompassionateUse Act.
"»s-tl Ne=<
§ 26-2B-4. Exemption from criminal and civil penalties for the ..., NM ST § 26-2B-4
0. Any property interest that is possessed, owned or used in connectionwith the medical use of cannabis, or acts incidental
to such use, shall not be harmed, neglected, injured or destroyed while in the possession of state or local law enforcement
officials.Any such property interest shall not be forfeitedunder any state or local law providing for the forfeitureof property
except as provided in the Forfeiture Act. Cannabis,paraphernaliaor other property seized from a qualified patient or primary
caregiver in connectionwith the claimed medical use of cannabis shall be returned immediatelyupon the determinationby a
court or prosecutor that the qualified patient or primary caregiver is entitled to the protections of the provisions of the Lynn
and Erin CompassionateUse Act, as may be evidencedby a failure to actively investigatethe case, a decisionnot to prosecute,
the dismissal of charges or acquittal.
H. A person shall not be subject to arrest or prosecution for a cannabis-relatedoffense for simply being in the presence of the
medical use of cannabis as permitted under the provisions of the Lynn and Erin CompassionateUse Act.
Credits
Added by L. 2007, Ch. 210, § 4, eff. July 1, 2007.
Notes of Decisions(3)
End of D11c11111enl (·) 2014 Thomson Rcuk-ts. No claim to nrigin;il U.~LGovcrn1ncnl \Vurks
Vkrsl Next 1$ 201 1 htll'T",on · , rs. o 'rn 1 Ir. o ,qr al U G,>v,nn en1 W rks
§ 26-28-5. Prohibitions, restrictions and limitations on the medical..., NM ST§ 26-28-5
N. M. S. A 1978, § 26-2B-5
§ 26-2B-5. Prohibitions, restrictions and limitations on the medical use of cannabis; criminal penalties
(1) criminalprosecutionor civil penaltiesfor activitiesnot authorizedin the Lynn and Erin CompassionateUse Act;
B. A person who makes a fraudulentrepresentationto a law enforcementofficer about the person'sparticipationin a medical
use of cannabisprogramto avoid arrest or prosecutionfor a cannabis-relatedoffenseis guilty of a petty misdemeanorand shall
be sentencedin accordancewith the provisionsof Section31-19-1NMSA 1978.
Credits
Addedby L. 2007, Ch. 210, § 5, eff. July I, 2007.
Nu .la1111 I II
§ 26-2B-5. Prohibitions, restrictions and limitations on the medical ... , NM ST§ 26-2B-5
End of Document @2014 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
,'A </';wvNext ct, 2014 ~ homson Rcut0rs Nc- cl~1m to c1rig1nalUS Covt rnrne 1•VVo•·ks 2
§ 26-2B-6. Advisory board created; duties, NM ST § 26-2B-6
N. M. S. A. 1978, § 26-2B-6
Effective:July 1, 2007
Currentness
The secretaryof health shall establishan advisoryboard consistingof eight practitionersrepresentingthe fields of neurology,
pain management,medical oncology,psychiatry,infectiousdisease, family medicine and gynecology.The practitionersshall
be nationallyboard-certifiedin their area of specialtyand knowledgeableaboutthe medicaluse of cannabis.The membersshall
be chosenfor appointmentby the secretaryfrom a list proposedby the New Mexicomedical society.A quorumof the advisory
board shall consist of three members.The advisoryboard shall:
A. review and recommendto the departmentfor approvaladditionaldebilitatingmedical conditionsthat would benefit from
the medical use of cannabis;
B. accept and review petitions to add medical conditions,medical treatmentsor diseases to the list of debilitatingmedical
conditionsthat qualify for the medical use of cannabis;
C. convene at least twice per year to conduct public hearings and to evaluate petitions, which shall be maintained as
confidentialpersonalhealth information,to add medical conditions,medical treatmentsor diseasesto the list of debilitating
medical conditionsthat qualify for the medical use of cannabis;
E. recommendquantitiesof cannabis that are necessaryto constitute an adequate supply for qualifiedpatients and primary
caregivers.
Credits
Added by L. 2007, Ch. 210, § 6, eff. July 1, 2007.
l•:ml of llocumcnl !,"l 1,014 Thomson Rcukrs. No claim 1o m iginal U.S. Oovermnent \Vorks.
N. M. S. A 1978, § 26-2B-7
A. No later than October 1, 2007, and after consultationwith the advisory board, the departmentshall promulgaterules in
accordancewith the State Rules Act to implementthe purposeof the Lynn and Erin CompassionateUse Act. The rules shall:
(1) governthe manner in whichthe departmentwill considerapplicationsfor registry identificationcards and for the renewal
of identificationcards for qualifiedpatients and primary caregivers;
(3) identify criteria and set forth proceduresfor includingadditionalmedical conditions,medicaltreatmentsor diseasesto
the list of debilitatingmedical conditionsthat qualify for the medical use of cannabis.Proceduresshall include a petition
process and shall allow for public commentand public hearingsbefore the advisoryboard;
(4) set forth additionalmedical conditions,medical treatmentsor diseasesto the list of debilitatingmedical conditionsthat
qualify for the medicaluse of cannabisas recommendedby the advisoryboard;
(5) identifyrequirementsfor the licensureof producersand cannabisproductionfacilitiesand set forth proceduresto obtain
licenses;
(b) distributionof medical cannabis to qualifiedpatients or their primary caregiversto take place at locationsthat are
designatedby the departmentand that are not within three hundredfeet of any school,churchor daycarecenter;
Next n son
§ 26-2B-7. Registry identification cards; department rules; duties, NM ST§ 26-2B-7
B. The departmentshall issue registry identificationcards to a patient and to the primarycaregiverfor that patient, if any, who
submitthe following,in accordancewith the department'srules:
(4) the name, address and date ofbirth of the patient'sprimarycaregiver,if any.
D. The departmentshall issue a registryidentificationcard within five days of approvingan application,and a card shall expire
one year after the date of issuance.A registryidentificationcard shall contain:
(1) the name, addressand date of birth of the qualifiedpatient and primary caregiver,if any;
F. Possessionof or applicationfor a registry identificationcard shall not constituteprobablecause or give rise to reasonable
suspicionfor a governmentalagency to searchthe person or propertyof the person possessingor applyingfor the card.
G. The departmentshall maintaina confidentialfile containingthe names and addressesof the personswho have either applied
for or received a registry identificationcard. Individualnames on the list shall be confidentialand not subject to disclosure,
except:
(1) to authorizedemployeesor agents of the departmentas necessaryto performthe dutiesof the departmentpursuantto the
provisionsof the Lynn and Erin CompassionateUse Act;
1/k'sh, Next 1 21114 fh , ,., )11R< iler .I un lo w ,gin 11U S Gov rnrn nl Works 2
§ 26-28-7. Registry Identification cards; department rules; duties, NM ST§ 26-28-7
(2) to authorizedemployeesof state or local law enforcementagencies,but only for the purpose of verifyingthat a person
is lawfullyin possessionof a registryidentificationcard; or
Credits
Addedby L. 2007, Ch. 210, § 7, eff. July 1, 2007.
\l'~taw Nexr © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 3
Debilitating Medical Conditions
1. Cancer
2. Glaucoma
3. Multiple sclerosis
4 . Damage to the nervous tissue of the spinal cord, with objective neurological indication of
intractable spasticity
5. Epilepsy
6. HIV/AIDS
3. Intractable nausea/vomiting
4. Severe anorexia/cachexia
6. Crohn's disease
7. PTSD
EXHIBfr
I Cf
§ 26-2B-3. Definitions, NM ST § 26-2B-3
N. M. S. A.1978, § 26-2B-3
§ 26-2B-3. Definitions
Effective:July 1, 2007
Currentness
B. "debilitatingmedicalcondition"means:
(1) cancer;
(2) glaucoma;
(3) multiplesclerosis;
(5) epilepsy;
MedicalCannabisProgram
MedicalAdvisoryBoardMeetingAgenda
January15, 2009
Location:1231 CandelariaNW
Albuquerque,NM 87107
THURSDAYJanuary15, 2009:
1. 9:00 a.m. • OpeningRemarks
3. Review Petitions*:
2009-01
2009-02
2009-03
2009-04
2009-05
2009-06
EXHIBIT
I A
Committee Report
1. EveElting, M.D.
2. EveEspey,M.D.
3. William Johnson,M.D.
4. Mitch Simson,M.D.
A. Painfulperipheralneuropathy
1. Biologicalplausibility:
CBl receptorspresent in peripheral nervesmediatethe major activity of
endogenousand exogenouscannabinoids.There may be a minor role of CB2
receptorsIn decreasingInflammatoryprocessesIn someforms of peripheral
neuropathy. A study of capsaicin-lnducedneuropathicpain In normalvolunteers
suggestsa therapeutic window for smokedcannabis,with low to moderatedoses
decreasingpain and higher dosesIncreasingpain. In contrast,exogenous
cannablnoldshave not beendemonstratedto be effective analgesicsIn the
treatment of acute nociceptivepain that is not related to nervedamage.
a. Martin Fontelleset al., "Role of cannablnoldsIn the managementof
neuropathicpain", CNSDrugs22: 645-653,2008.
b. WallaceM et al., "Dose-dependenteffects of smokedcannabison capsaicin-
lnducedpain and hyperalgeslaIn health volunteers",Anesthesiology107:
785~796,2007.
c. Kraft et al., "Lackof analgesiaby oral standardizedcannabisextract on
acute Inflammatorypain and hyperalgesiain volunteers",Anesthesiology
109: 101-110,2008.
2. Clinicaldata:
Two recently publishedclinicaltrials of neuropathicpainassociatedwith HIVdisease
and its treatment supportthe effectivenessof smokedcannabisIn the relief of
neuropathlcpain. A studyof pain relatedto brachia!plexusavulsionshoweda
benefit in terms of pain relief and sleepfor two cannabisbasedmedicinalextracts
not currently avallablein the U.S. A secondstudy of neuropathlcpaindue to
different causes(multiplesclerosis,spinalcord Injury, brachia!plexusdamageand
limb amputation)suggestedthat cannabismedicinalextractscould provide relief
from neurogenlcsymptomsthat were unresponsiveto standardtherapies.
d. AbramsDI et al., "CannabisIn painful HIV-associated sensoryneuropathy;a
randomizedplacebo-controlledtrial", Neurology68: 515-521,2007.
e. EllisRJet al., "Smokedmedicalcannabisfor neuropathlcpain In HIV:a
randomized,crossoverclinicaltrial", Neuropsychopharmacology 34: 672-680,
2009.
f. BermanJSet al., "Efficacyof two cannabisbasedmedicinalextractsfor relief of
central neuropathicpainfrom brachia!plexusavulsion:resultsof a randomized
controlled trial", Pain112: 299-306.
g. Wade OTet al., "A preliminarycontrolled study to determinewhether whole-
plant cannabisextractscan improve Intractableneurogenicsymptoms",Clinical
Rehabilitation17: 21-29,2003.
3. Seriousnessof the medicalcondition:
PainfulperipheralneuropathyIs a seriousmedicalconditionthat can havea
significantimpact upon the mobility, daily functioningand quality of life of an
individual. It is painconditionthat is very difficult to managein manycaseswith
existingmedications.
4. Verification of the medicalcondition
The diagnosisof peripheralneuropathycan be confirmedby diagnostictests and by
the evaluationof a qualifiedmedicalpractitioner.
s. Specificconditionsfor inclusionof the condition:
All casesof peripheralneuropathyshouldbe verified by objectivediagnostictesting
and should be confirmedby a qualified medicalpractitioner. Applicationto the
Medical CannabisProgramshould be accompaniedby medicalrecordsthat confirm
the presenceof painful peripheralneuropathythat hasbeenrefractoryto other
treatments.
B. Intractablenausea/ vomiting
1. Biologicalplausiblllty:
CB1receptorsare presentboth in the dorsalvaguscomplexof the bralnstemand In
the myenteric plexusof the stomachand duodenum. The role of central CBl
receptors probably mediatesthe effect of cannabinoldson "anticipatory'' nausea
and vomiting.
An extensivereview of pharmacologicalstudies of cannabinoidphysiologyis
contained in the following:
a. CroxfordJLet al., "Therapeuticpotential of cannabinoidsin CNSdisease",
CNSDrugs,1: 179-202, 2003.
2, Clinicaldata:
There is an extensivemedicalliterature on the effectivenessof cannabinoldsIn the
treatment of intractable nauseaand vomiting, much related to cancer
chemotherapy-Inducednauseaand vomiting. This experienceis reviewed in:
b. MachadoRochaFCet al., "Therapeuticuseof Cannabissativaon
chemotherapy-inducednauseaand vomiting amongcancerpatients:
systematicreview and meta-analysis",EuropeanJournalof CancerCare17:
413-443, 2008.
3. Seriousnessof the condition:
Intractable nauseaand vomiting has a significant impact upon functionality and
quality of life. It can havean Impact as well upon nutrition and can lead to damage
of the upper gastrointestinaltract.
4. Verification of the medicalcondition
The condition can be verified by medical history and the evaluationof a qualified
clinician.
5. Specificconditionsfor inclusionof the condition:
Application to the MedicalCannabisProgramshould be accompaniedby medical
recordsthat confirm the presenceof Intractable nauseaand vomiting that hasbeen
refractory to other treatments.
C. SevereAnorexia/ Cachexia
1. Biologicalplausibility:
The appetite stimulatory effects of the cannabinoldsare well describedand are
mediated by CBl receptorsin the central nervoussystem.
a. CroxfordJLet al., ibid.
2. Clinicaldata:
A randomizedplacebo-controlledtrial of smokedcannabisin patients with HIV
demonstrated benefits in terms of calorie intake and weight gain:
c. AbramsDI et al., "Short-term effects of cannabinoidsin patients with HIV-1
infection: a randomized,placebo-controlledcllnlcaltrial", Annalsof Internal
Medicine139: 258-266, 2003.
3. Seriousnessof the condition:
Severeanorexiarelated to medicalconditions can have a significanteffect upon
nutritional status and quality of life.
4. Verification of the medicalcondition
Thecondition can be verified by medicalhistory, by a nutritional evaluationand
physicalexaminationby a qualified clinician.
s. Specificconditionsfor Inclusionof the condition:
Applicationto the MedicalCannabisProgramshould be accompaniedby medical
recordsand the evaluationof a qualifiedclinicianthat confirm the presenceof
severeanorexiarelatedto an underlyingmedicalcondition that hasbeenrefractory
to other treatments.
D. HepatitisCinfectioncurrentlyreceivingantMraltreatment
1. Biologicalplauslblllty:
Treatmentof hepatitisCwith exogenousinterferons In particularis associatedwith
frequent and significantadverseeventsIncludingseverenausea,vomiting and
anorexia. The biologicalrole of cannablnoidsin treating nausea,vomiting and
anorexiaIs describedabove.
2. Clinicaldata:
ThereIs one clinicaltrial of the useof oral cannabinoidsin the managementof HCV
therapy related symptoms. That study showedsignificantrelief of symptoms,with a
higherproportion of oral cannabinoldusersbeingable to completea full courseof
HCVtreatment:
a. CostlnlukCTet al., uEvaluationof oral cannablnoid-containing medications
for the managementof Interferonand ribavlrin-inducedanorexia,nausea
and weight lossIn patientstreated for chronic hepatitisC virus'', Canadian
Journalof Gastroenterology22: 376-380,2008.
Two cautionarystudiesby Hezodeet al. are worth noting. Recentstudieshave
found an associationbetweendally cannabissmoking,hepaticsteatosisand
progressionof fibrosis in chronic hepatitisC. Therefore,cannabiscould not be
recommendedat this time for peoplewith chronic hepatitisCexceptfor those
Individualscurrently undergoingtreatment with Interferon:
b. HezodeC et al., "Daily cannabissmokingas a risk factor for progressionof
fibrosis In chronichepatitis C", Hepatology42: 63-71,2005.
c. HezodeC et al., "Daily cannabisuse:a novel risk factor of steatosisseverity
In patientswith chronichepatitisC.Gastroentero/ogy134: 432-439, 2008.
3. Seriousnessof the condition:
Severeside effects relatedto exogenousinterferon therapy cansignificantlyaffect
the ability of the patient to completea courseof treatment.
4. Verificationof the medicalcondition
The presenceof hepatitisC Infection and its current treatment are readilyverified
with medicalrecords.
5. Specialconsiderationsfor Inclusionof the condition:
Applicationto the MedicalCannabisProgramshould be accompaniedby medical
recordsand the evaluationof a qualifiedclinicianthat confirm that the patient has
hepatitisC Infection and is currently undergoingantiviral treatment for the hepatitis
C Infection.
E. Crohn'sDisease
1. Biologicalplausibility:
CB2receptorswithin the gastrointestinaltract appearto modulate intestinal
Inflammationand limit visceralsensitivityand pain. GastrointestinalCB2receptors
are beingactively Investigatedastargets for treating Inflammatorybowel diseases.
In addition to CBl receptors,CBl receptorsare InvolvedIn gastrointestinalmotility
and secretion,and mediatesomeof the dysmotlllty and abdominalpain associated
with Inflammatory bowel disease:
a. Wright KLet al., "CannabinoldCB2receptorsIn the gastrointestinaltract: a
regulatory systemin statesof Inflammation", BritishJournalof
Pharmacology153: 263-270,2008.
b. KunosGet al., "Cannabinoidscool the Intestine", Nature Medicine 10: 678-
679, 2004.
2. Clinicaldata:
A Medline searchrevealsno publishedclinicaldata on the useof medicalcannabis
for the treatment of inflammatorybowel disease.
3. Seriousnessof the condition:
Crohn'sdiseasecan be manifestedby severeInflammatory diseaseand associated
abdominalpain and GI dysmotility.
4. Verification of the medicalcondition
The presenceof Crohn'sdiseaseis readilyverified by medicalrecordsand by the
evaluationof a qualified medicalpractitioner.
5. Specialconsiderationsfor the inclusionof the condition:
Applicationto the MedicalCannabisProgramshould be accompaniedby medical
recordsand the evaluationof a qualified clinicianthat confirm that the patient has
Crohn'sdiseaseand that it Is refractory to treatment with other modalities.
F. Post-Traumatic StressDisorder(PTSD)
1. Biologicalplausibility:
The two main cannablnoidspresent In smokedcannabis,delta9-
tetrahydrocannabinol(delta9-THC)and cannabidiol(CBD)appearto differ In their
effects upon lnductlon of anxiety and relief of anxiety,and they appearto mediate
this effect by acting on different areasof the central nervoussystem. The
endocannablnoidsystemis also required for the extinction of conditionedfear
responseswhich are characteristicof PTSO:
a. Fusar-PoliPet al., "Distinct effects of delta9-tetrahydrocannablnoland
cannabidiolon neural activation during emotional processing",Archivesof
GeneralPsychiatry66: 95-105, 2009.
.,
b. ChhatwalJPet al., "Functionalinteractionsbetweenendocannabinoidand CCK
neurotransmittersystemsmay be critical for extinction learning'',
Neuropsychopharmacology 34: 509-521,2009.
c. ChhatwalJPet al., "Enhancingcannabinoldneurotransmisslonaugmentsthe
extinctionof conditionedfear", Neuropsychopharmaco/ogy 30: 516-524,2005.
d. Lin HCet al., "Effectsof lntra-amygdalainfusionof CB1receptoragonistson the
reconsolidationof fear-potentiatedstartle", Learning& Memory 13: 316-321,
2006.
e. PamplonaFAet al., "The cannabinoidreceptoragonistWIN 55,212-2facilitates
the extinctionof contextualfear memoryand spatialmemory in rats",
Psychopharmacology (Berlin)188: 641-649,2006.
f. ResstelLBet al., "5-HTreceptorsare involvedin the cannabldiol-induced
attenuationof behaviouraland cardiovascularresponsesto acute restraint
stressin rats" BritishJournalof Pharmacology156: 181-189,2009.
2. Clinicaldata
Thereare no specificclinicaltrials data regardingthe useof cannabinoldsfor the
treatment of PTSD.However,there are somepreclinicaldata related to the
treatment of anxietydisorderswith cannabidloland cannabidiolcogeners.Thereis
alsoa publishedsurveystudy of VietnamcombatveteransIn which participants
reportedthat marijuanausemadetheir PTSDsymptomsbetter.
a. RoserPet al., "Potential antipsychoticpropertiesof centralcannablnold(CBl)
receptorantagonists",WorldJournalof B/ologlcalPsychiatry7: 1-12,2008.
b. BremnerJDet al., "ChronicPTSDin Vietnamcombatveterans:courseof illness
and substanceabuse",AmericanJournalof Psychiatry153: 369-375,1996.
3. Seriousness of the condition
PTSDis a very seriouscondition that significantlyaffectssocialfunctioning and
quality of life. It can be difficult to treat with existingmodalities. The lack of
documentedeffectivetreatment modalitiesfor PTSDIs discussedat length In the
Institute of MedicineReporttitled ''Treatmentof PosttraumatlcStressDisorder:An
Assessmentof the Evidence"(IOM, October17, 2007). In this study,the Institute of
Medicinereviewed90 randomizedclinicaltrials, 37 pharmacotherapystudiesand
53 psychotherapystudies. The panel concludedthat, with the exceptionof
exposuretherapies,there was Inadequateevidenceto supportthe effectivenessof
standardInterventionsfor the managementof PTSD.The panelrecommended
implementationof a rigorousPTSDtreatment researchprogram.
4. Verificationof the condition
Thereare DSM-IVcriteria for makingthe diagnosisof PTSD.
5. Specialconsiderationsfor the Inclusionof the condition
The MedicalCannabisProgramshould require medicalrecordsthat documentan
assessmentby a licensedpsychiatristand a DSM-IVdiagnosisof PTSD.In addition,
the psychiatristshouldattest that other treatment modalitieshavefailed to provide
. .
adequaterelief of symptomsand that medicalcannabismight be of benefit to the
patient.
G. AmyotrophicLateralSclerosis(LouGehrig'sDisease)
1. Biologicalplausibility
Cannabinoidsappearto have a neuroprotectlveeffect in certain neurodegenerative
diseasesthrough activity upon CB2receptors:
a. Weydt Pet al., "Cannabinoldelayssymptomonset in 5OD1(G93A)transgenic
mice without affecting survival"Amyotroph/cLateralSclerosis& OtherMotor
NeuronDisorders6: 182-184.
b. ShoemakerJLet al., ''The CB2cannabinoldagonistAM-1241 prolongssurvivalIn
a transgenicmouse model of amyotrophiclateral sclerosiswhen Initiated at
symptom onset", Journalof Neurochemlstry101: 87-98, 2007.
c. Kim Ket al., "AM1241, a cannablnoidCB2receptor selectivecompound,delays
diseaseprogressionin a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis",
EuropeanJournalof Pharmacology542: 100-105,2006.
2. Clinicaldata
There are no clinical data that are directly relevantto the evaluation of medical
cannabisin ALS. There is one publishedsurveyof the use of medicalcannabisby
ALSpatients that indicatesthat patients receivedbenefit in terms of reducing
symptomsof appetite loss,depression,pain, spasticityand drooling, but no relief in
terms of speechand swallowingor sexualdysfunction. There Is one publicationof a
pilot study that demonstratedsafety and tolerability of Marino! in the treatment of
ALSpatients:
c. Amtmann D et al., "Surveyof cannabisusein patients with amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis",AmericanJournalof Hospiceand PalliativeCare21: 95-
104, 2004.
d. GelinasD et al., "A pilot study of safetyand tolerability of delta9-THC
(Marino!) treatment of Al5", AmyotrophicLateralSclerosis& Other Motor
NeuronDisorders3: 23, 2002.
3. Seriousnessof the condition
Al5 is a very seriouscondition with significantmorbidity and a poor prognosis.
Therapeuticoptions, both in terms of slowingdiseaseprogressionand managing
clinical manifestations,are few and often Ineffective.
4. Verification of the condition
The diagnosisof Al5 is verifiable by clinicalcriteria and diagnostictests.
5. Specialconsiderationsfor inclusionof the condition
The MedicalCannabisProgramshould require medicalrecordsthat document the
diagnosisof Al5, and a written statement from the patient's attending physician
that medicalcannabisis likely to be of benefit.
;
H. Flbromyalgia
1. Biologicalplausiblllty
FibromyalglaIsa pain syndromewith a poorly defined pathophysiology:
a. BradleyLA."Pathophysiologicmechanismsof fibromyalglaand its related
disorders",Journalof ClinicalPsychiatry69 Suppl2: 6-13,2008.
It is conceivablethat the action of cannablnoidsof CB1receptorsmight havea
beneficialeffect upon the pain that is characteristicof fibromyalgia:
b. McPartlandJM. "Expressionof the endocannablnoldsystemin fibroblasts
and myofasclaltissues",Journalof Bodywork& MovementTherapies12:
169-182, 2008.
c. RussoEB."Clinicalendocannablnoiddeficiency(CECO): can this concept
explaintherapeuticbenefits of cannabisin migraine,fibromyalgia,Irritable
bowel syndromeand other treatment-resistantconditions?"
Neuroendocrlnology Letters29: 192-200,2008.
2. Clinicaldata
Thereare no publishedclinicaldata regardingthe effectivenessof medicalcannabis
in the managementof fibromyalgia.
3. Seriousnessof the condition
Fibromyalglacan havea significantImpactupon socialfunctioning and quality of
life.
4. Verificationof the condition
TheAmericanCollegeof Rheumatology"1990 Criteriafor the Classificationof
Fibromyalgla"(Wolfe Fetal., ''TheAmericanCollegeof Rheumatology1990Criteria
for the Classificationof Fibromyalgla:Reportof the Multicenter Criteria
Committee",Arthritis & Rheumatism33: 160-172,1990)include:
a. Historyof widespreadpain presentfor at least3 months,on both sidesof the
body and aboveand below the waist.
b. Painin 11 of 18 tender point siteson digital palpation("trigger points")
c. In addition to muscularpain,frequent associationof the following signsand
symptoms:fatigue, insomnia,joint pains,headaches,restlesslegs,numbness
and tingling, Impairedmemory, leg cramps,impairedconcentration,
nervousness,major depression
5. Specialconsiderationsfor Inclusionof the condition
Forthe purposesof the MedicalCannabisProgram,the clinicaldiagnosisof
fibromyalglawould be problematicto verify.
A. Depression
1. Biologicalplausibility:
The biologicalrationalefor a therapeutic effect of medicalcannabisin depressionIs not well
described. Delta9-THCand cannabidiolappearto havedifferent effectsin the CNSmediated
through different receptorsIn different locations In the CNSthat can result in a mixture of
excitatory and anxiolytlc effects.
2. Clintcatdata:
In the caseof both major depressivedisorder and bipolar disorder,there are studiesthat cause
significantconcernregardingthe role of exogenouscannablnoldsIn exacerbatingnegative
manifestationsof these disorders,Includingpsychosisand suicide:
a. Winokur Get al., "Alcoholismand drug abuseIn three groups- bipolar I, unlpolarsand
their acquaintances",Journalof Affective DisordersSO:81-89, 1998.
b. BaethgeC et al., "SubstanceabuseIn first-episodebipolar I disorder: indicationsfor
early Interventlon", AmericanJournalof Psychiatry162: 1008-1010,2005.
c. BaethgeC et al., "Sequencingof substanceuseand affective morbidity in 166 first-
episodebipolar I disorder patients.Bipolar Disorder10: 738-741,2008.
d. StrakowskiSM et al., "The impact of substanceabuseon the courseof bipolar disorder'',
BiologicalPsychology48: 477-485,2000.
3. Seriousnessof the condition
Major depressiveillnessand its attendant morbidity and mortality are a significantpublic health
concern. The preponderanceof availabledata suggeststhat medicalcannabiscould overall
have a negativeImpact upon this condition.
4. Verification of the condition
There are DSM-IVcriteria for the diagnosisof major depressiveIllnessand bipolar disorder.
5. Specialconsiderationsfor inclusionof the condition
The Medical AdvisoryCommittee to the Medical CannabisProgramadvisesthat depressionnot
be recommendedfor addition to the list of eligible conditions.
C. EnvironmentalIllness
There Is no documentedbiologic rationale or clinical data to support a role for the use of
medical cannabisin the managementof environmental illness.
D, BrainDysfunction
The Medical AdvisoryCommittee voted to not recommendthis condition becausethe condition
was not adequatelydefined.
E, EstrogenReplacementTherapy
There is no documented biologic rationale or cllnlcaldata to support a role for the useof
medical cannabisin the managementof people currently receivingestrogenreplacement
therapy.
For Immediate Release: Contact: Deborah Busemeyer
February 16, 2009 Office: 827-2619, Cell: 4 70-2290
(Santa Fe)- Health Secretary Dr. Alfredo Vigil announced today that the New Mexico
Department of Health is adding seven new medical conditions to its Medical Cannabis Program.
Dr. Vigil based his decision on the Department's Medical Advisory Board's recommendations, a
review of scientific literature that shows the conditions could be helped by medical cannabis and
the purpose of the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act to provide relief from pain and
suffering associated with debilitating medical conditions.
The seven new conditions are: painful peripheral neuropathy, intractable nausea/vomiting, severe
anorexia/cachexia, hepatitis C infection currently receiving antiviral treatment, Crohn's disease,
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (Lou Gehrig ' s disease).
"It's important that we add conditions to our program only if we have scientific evidence that
medical cannabis can provide relief to people who are suffering from those chronic conditions,"
Dr. Vigil said. "We are proud to reach this step where we can help even more people who are
suffering needlessly."
The eight-member Medical Advisory Board had recommended approving eight conditions. Dr .
Vigil did not approve fibromyalgia because there is not enough evidence that medical cannabis
can be potential effective for that condition . Dr. Vigil accepted the Board's recommendation to
deny petitions to add depression, chronic hepatitis C infection (without receiving treatment),
environmental illness, brain dysfunction and estrogen replacement therapy.
The board-certified physicians who serve on the Medical Advisory Board will meet again
onApril 13 to review additional petitions and reconsider other petitions previously submitted.
The Board had requested more information from people who petitioned to add chronic pain,
bipolar disorder, arthritis, asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic fatigue
syndrome and chronic sinus congestion from blunt-facial trauma. People must submit petitions
by March 13 to be considered at the April hearing. The Department is determining the location
of the hearing.
Once a condition is approved, anyone with that medical condition can apply to the Medical
Cannabis Program. In addition to the new conditions added, qualifying conditions are: cancer,
glaucoma, multiple sclerosis, damage to the nervous tissue of the spinal cord with intractable
spasticity, epilepsy and HIV/AIDS. Hospice patients may also be eligible.
To apply for the Medical Cannabis program or to petition for a new condition, look up
http://www. nmhenlth.Qrg/mar ijuana .html or call the Medical Cannabis Program Coordinator at
505-827-2321 .
EXHIBIT
Office of the Secretary• 1190 St. Francis Drive, N4100 • P.O. Box 26110
Santa Fe, New Mexico• 87502-6110 • (505) 827-2613 • FAX: (505) 827-2530
http://www .nmhealth .org
j 6
For all conditions, physicians must certify that patients have an eligible condition, and the
condition is debilitating and not helped by standard treatments. Physicians must also attest that
they have informed patients of the potential risks and benefits associated with using medical
cannabis for their condition. For post traumatic stress disorder, a psychiatrist must certify that
patients have the disorder.
Since the Medical Cannabis Program began July 1, 2007, the Department of Health has
approved 207 patient applications.
###
CC\t<·ol~
l(ievc M. D.
--- - ---~-
General Psychiatry
<atells me that since the miscarriage, she has not been able to be intimate with
her boyfriend because she is so afraid that she will become pregnant again. This has
put a big strain on their relationship. Her relationships with other people have
suffered as well; she doesn't feel as though she can trust people. She has been
1believe that the trauma cal experienced this summer, triggered much earlier
trauma, which she experie~as a young teenager at the hands of her father.
~an playing golf at abou!lia
e 5 with her uncle. It became clear to her uncle
th~ had talent, so he told sf ther, who became extremely ambitious
for her. Beginning in her early teens, s fathe·r would d rout of bed at 5
o'clock every morning (before school), ta e er to o "warm up"
by shooting baskets for awhile before driving her o to
play golf before taking her to school. cllllwas expecte to eep her gr_a~ as
welJ as concentrate heavily on her golf game. Her father began entering llllllllrin
tournaments and she began winning, at which point s-e be an to like the game.
However, the morning routine with her father drove razy and she began
wearing headphones to listen to music so that she wou n ave to listen to him
yelling at her . There were several times when he became so angry that he would rip
the headphones off of-so that she had no choice but to listen to his yelling.
~ (-ut:J
(~LA-tvfJ~
Carola Kieve, M.D.
. -,:,· ·· '; ,. ,
. _., ,I
~ .\ \ ~-~~ , __
;
u!' .
~
.. :
',,-
-
.-
l Dear Patient Applicant,
NAME:
___ Re-cnrollmeul
Please return this form with missing
documentation.
Thank you for applying to the Medical Cannabis Program. Through the ndministrntive review process, it bas been determined that your
application is incomplete . We will continue processing your application proceS!lwhen the infom1alion requested below has been received.
The program cannot ncccpt Items via email or rax nnd nU medical records must be within thc Inst 12 months.
0 Clear copy ofNM Photo I.D. (Driver's License or NM Stale ID Card) - Must be a copy of the pem1ancnt'NM Photo I.D. -Temporary/
Extension J.D. or licenses are not accepted.)
0 Outdated forms were submitted. Please re-submit current program forms. They can be found on the program website below.
0 EnrollmenVApplicationforms MUST be originals. Copies are NOT accepted.
0 Notes:
EXHIBIT
I E
Carola l{icvc M. D.
General Psychiatry
14111-has applied for a medical Cannabis Card. She received a letter in the
~requesting documentation of medications that have been tried and failed. No
medications have been tried because the patient does not want to take
pharmaceuticals. I have insisted that she be in therapy to discuss and work out the
issues that have caused her to have PTSD.I cannot and will not force a patient to
take pharmaceuticals if they wish not to.
Sincerely
GelH£4..
~c i·Lf' -it v:J
CaroJa Kieve, M.D. I
t2c1:,v~ .
(
B"-
V
R1;-----=
NOV2 7 2013
___ Re-enrollment
Dear Patient Applicant,
Thank you for applying to the Medical Cannabis Program. Through the administrative review process, it has been determined that your
application is incomplete. We will continue processing your application process when the information requested below has been received.
The program cannot accept items via email or fax and all medical records must be within the last 12 months.
D Clear copy ofNM Photo l.D. (Driver's License or NM State ID Card) - Must be a copy of the pennanent NM Photo I.D. -Temporary/
Extension I.D. or licenses are not accepted.)
D Outdated forms were submitted. Please re-submit current program fonns. They can be found on the program website below.
D Enrollment/Application forms MUST be originals. Copies are NOT accepted.
I (5 B't'.._·
------
r
Carol" l{ievc M. D.
General Psychiatry
This letter concerns Itli:allil who is my patient. Her application for a medical
cannabis card was demed ~lack of documentation re medications and
therapies that have been tried in the past, as well as the need for a mental status
exam.
Sincerely,
~~~~·;31
B~-----
vf 7·17"; ~ I;.Y/L-7° ':71~ ;(-- EXHIBIT
-~
505 660 4093
I 11
C~1\:,l~ l{icvc f\,..,t
D.
Gene1°0IPsychiatry
,~ EXHIBIT
L...111 UllllltillU ni::-i::111 UllllltHll I IIIUI llli::lllUII rur Ill
1/' N,.~;~_••f~l1'E1,2~.1.c,o]~
_ ~=:!!!!:.·]~!-
""";Y
... !!L- _!!
Pk= pri,t end=~• ,ppllo,,t;o, ~ compl,1<.Jm,omptct, ., m,g;b),,ppllmtloos o, •wlkotioo, w;<l
missing documentswill delay processing.Incomplete applications will be kept on file for six months from the
HEA(JH L-
s must have original signatures. Photocopies,
fonn r-ec-e-iv-cd_b_y_th_c_p_ro-gra_m_
-da-le_• ;_a_lle_r_si_x_m laxeo and
_on-th-s-it_w_it-,l electronicw-ap-p-
-be.,...v--o·...,
1de copies
,....d:,::an-:-d-a-n-e-wlllio-n-m-
li-ca-t notu-st-b-e-su-b-m-i~-ed--_A_
beaccepted . II _ __,
Mailing Address·
City
Email:
By signing below, I certify that all the infonnation submitted is complete and correct. I also acknowledge that I have
read and will abide by the limitations and restrictions on my right to use and possess medical cannabis as stated in the
Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act and in New Mexico Administrative Code 7.34.3, the full text can be found on
. ro am website at: nmhealth.org/abou1/mcp/svcs/.
(Date)
THE ENROLLME~IT/RE•ENROLLMENTMEDICAL CERTIFICATION FORM MUSTBE COMPLETEDIN FULL BY THE MEDICAL PROVIDER.
I NMOOH USEONLy i
DateChart Created:_____ ReviewedBy: Medical Cannabis Program• NM Departmentof Health
PPL ApplicationAttached: _ YES_ NO 1190St. FranclsDrive,S3400• Santa Fe, NewMexico87505
/505)827·2321
t NTEREn EXHIBIT DECE&VEn Page 1
~,, NOV
2.5,r lJ
Revise
1 ~ n N8Vt 8 2014 U
tte-enro11ment
c 11,u11111tmu Medical certification Form
YI . NEWMEXICOPlease print clearly and ensure applicationis complete.Incompleteor illegibleapplicationsor applicationswitll
missingdocumentswill delay processing.Incompleteapplicationswill be kept on file for six months from the
DEPARTMENT OF
( HEA[J
H L.
-d-a-te_re
fonns _cmust
_e_iv_e_have
d_b_y_t_
original
h_e _p_ro_gr
_am
signatures
_ ;_aft
_ e_r s_. i_
Photocopies
x _m_o_n_th_s-it_w
_, ill
faxed
_b_e_v_o
and
_id_e_electronic
d_an
_ d_a_n_e_wcopies
_a_p_p_li_cwill
a-t1
_·o_n_
not
m_u_s_
bet -baccepted.
e_ s_u_b_m_i_tt_ed_._A_l_l _ __.
For re-enrollments, the provider must re-certify that the patient's medicnl condition still wnrrnnts the use of medical can~is by selecting the
answer that applies. Doyou believe this person still meets the ellglbilltyrequirements for the MedicalCannabisProgram? 1l Yes D No
·me New Mexico Department of Health, Medical CannabisProgram will verify the information providedwithin 30 days of receiving a full and complete
application. Verification of medical infonnation may include, with patient consent, examination of medical records documenting the patient hes a current
diagnosis ofa. debilitating medical condition. Certification must be provided by n practitioner as defined in Section3 of the Lynn& Erin Compassionate
UseAct of 2007,"a pcl's on licensed in New Mexico to prescribe and administer drugs that are subject to the Controlled Substances Act." By signing
below you are attesting that your primaryplace of practice is within the State of Now Mexico. F'urthcr you are certifying patient eligibility for enrollment
in Lhe New Mexico Department of Health Medical Cannabis Program and agreeing to have patient medical records audited es necessary.
______,_---=----=-'--"_._-~----'-='-"=
--1--
....,.c~ti:___,
I_ City:
- ..-!c-r- - -c-:-- - 893,rd C,e rtifiad..Specialty:
~ {/\;fi \ H..,,
t¥!\cJ,lv'
b
StateJN M zjp"?ode Slb
_;==
Q -'-
----:~ ...u.J,"-:,.-r,,,--t'-,--::--rT'7"0~- - -- City: _ _ _______ State: NM Zip Code: ___ _
~=====f-__,____ Second Telephone N
t-- -- DEA License II:
Date: II/G'{l3
(Must be dated wfthin 90days of program receipt)
Date Chart Created: __ _ ___ ~o'{!d Medical Cannabis Program• NM Department of Health
Medical Director Signature: --- -~ate: __ _ 1190St. Francis Drive, S3400• Santa Fe, NM 87505
1MCP Coordinator/Manager Signature:__________ Date: __ _ {505)827-2321
NOV1 9 201~ Page 2
i::111u11111t:11urw-1:::111u111nem 1v1eaica1
liertmcattont-orm
' NEWMEXICQ Pleaseprint clearlyand ensure applicationis complete. Incompleteor illegibleapplicationsor applicationswith
11Jij:1tiiiiM::fal•);I missing documentswill delay processing. Incompleteapplicationswill be kept on file for six monthsfrom the
HEA[J
H.... -d-
forms
at-e r-e-must
ce-iv_e_d
have
-by- t-original
he- p-ro-gram
--signatures.
;-aft
_e_r-si_Photocopies,
x -m-on-th-s-it_w_i_
faxed
ll _be_ v_o_
and
id-ed
electronic
_ an
_ d_a-ne_w_a
copies
_p_pl-icwill
-at-io_n_
not be
m_u_
st_b_
accepted.
e _su_b_m-itt-ed_. _A_ll_----J
This form must be completedby the certifying medical practitioner and includedwith all applications.
Diagnosis: f TS.1)
O}Continuing Patient D Initial Visit □ Consultation I J IA U\(V\t'J,,i'laJ.
CC<£-tt,tf,l~~
v 1. tt reel
.....
J c(}.,Vik(llJ--e,.,
Have you attached medical records, diagnostic notes, or other records of treatment? I 4- ~ D Yes D No ~"-c
e
Where are patient records kept? Office '1.__ Other (explain) tl1;1l'{C
•heJ
Cl vYrnveLck;-
Treatment History/History of Diagnosis:
;'
Practitioner Signature
I NMOOHUSE ONLY
DateChart Created:____ _ _ a Approved C Not Approved Medicnl Cannabis Program• NM Departmentof Health
MedicalDirectorSignature: Date:__ _ 1190St. FrancisDrive, S3400• Santa Fe, NM 87505
1 MCP Coordinator/Manager Signature: Date:__ _ {505l 827-2321
Page 3
111.,1\iO,Hi UI I IIIUI IIIOLIUII ru, Ill
NEW
MEX
ICQr--P-le_as_e-pn-.n-t-cl-ear_l_y_an_d_e_n_su-re_a_p-pl-ic-at-io-n-is-c-om_p_le-te-. -ln-c-om_p_le-te_ o_r_il_le-gi-bl-e-ap_p_li-ca-ti-on_s_o_ra-p-pl-ic-at-io-ns_w_i-th- -,
DEPARTMENT
OF missingdocumentswill delay processing.Incompleteapplicationswill be kept on file for six monthsfrom the
( HEAIJH
.... forms
-da must
-te- r-ec have
_ b_y_loriginal
_e_iv-ed _he- p-ro_gr _e_r -si-Photocopies,
signatures.
_a_m_;-aft faxed
_l b_e_v_and
x -m-on_th_s-it_w_il electronic
_ a_n_d_a-ne_wcopies
o-id-ed _a_p-pl-icwill not
-at-io_n_ be
m_u_ accepted
st_b_
e -su-bm .-ed_. _A_ll _ ___,
- itt
Medical Cannabis Program to discuss my medical condition, including treatment records, test results and
I understand that I may revoke this release at any time. I also understand that if I wish to revoke this authorization,
I must do so in writing to the Medical Cannabis Program Coordinator, and that revocation may result in the
inability of the program to certify me as a Medical Cannabis Program participant. Additionally, I understand that
the revocation will not apply to information that has already been released in response to this authorization. The
information disclosed pursuant to the authorization is subject to potential re-disclosure by the recipient, and will not
be protected by the HIPAA privacy rule. I understand that this disclosure is voluntary and that signing this form is
not necessary in order to receive treatment from the Department of Health. This release is required, however, to
verify my eligibility for the Medical Cannabis Program.
By signing this release, I certify that I am aware that the program may provide verification of my enrollment and
personal production license status with law enforcement; but only for the purpose of verifying that a person is
lawfully enrolled in the medical cannabis program, or in the event that the medical cannabis program manager or
designee has reason to believe that a qualified patient or patient-applicant may have violated an applicable law or
failed to adhere to Department of Health regulations.
If this fonn is signed by a personal repr esentative, rather than the applicant a witness other than the personal
representative must sign below:
nEA[JH
. date received by the program; after six month s it will be voided and a new application must be submitted. All
~fi-or_m_s_m_u
_s_t _ha_v_c_o_ri_g_in
_a_l s-ig_n_a_tu
-rc_s___P_ho_t_o
_co_p_ie
_s_,_fu_x
_ec_l_:1n_d
_ e_•l_ec
_t _ro_n
_ic_·c_o_p
_ie_s_w
_i_ll_n_ot
_ be_a_c
_c_e1_1t
_cd_.___ _ ~
Thi form mu st be completed bv th e certif ying m edical practition er and included with all application
,, . vi
l
iactitioner Signature Date of Evaluation
i
N rno11 USE O J,Y
Date_Char~ Create~:
Medical Director Signature:
1
fl~~ ~ ApprO)'t:W Not App roved
D11tc:
/...>·'t 'f__
4-- Medi<ol C••••bi< r,?gcsm • NM Dep,rtme•t of Hea11
1190 St. Francis Driv e, S3400 • Santa Fe, NM 87502
· ·-- - •· · -"·- '~"--~ - - -- ~:nnn ,,...,_
. Date: ~-- (505)827-2321
7.34.2NMAC http://164.64. l l0.239/nmac/parts/title07 /07 .034.0002.htm
EXHIBIT
TITLE7
CHAPTER34
PART2
HEALTH
MEDICAL USE OF CANNABIS
ADVISORY BOARD RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES
I L
7.34.2.1 ISSUING AGENCY: New Mexico Department of Health, Medical Cannabis Program
[7.34.2.1 NMAC - Rp, 7.34.2.1 NMAC, 2/27/2015]
7.34.2.2 STATUTORY AUTHORITY: The requirements set forth herein are promulgated by the secretary of the
department of health pursuant to the authority granted under Section 9-7-6 (E) NMSA 1978, and the Lynn and Erin
Compassionate Use Act, 26-2B-1 et seq. NMSA 1978.
[7.34.2 .2 NMAC - Rp, 7.34.2.2 NMAC, 2/27/2015]
7.34.2.3 SCOPE: This part governs the membership, duties, responsibilities and public hearing proceedings of the
medical cannabis advisory board.
[7.34.2 .3 NMAC - Rp, 7.34.2.3 NMAC, 2/27/2015]
7.34.2.5 EFFECTIVE DATE: February 27, 2015, unless a later date is cited at the end of a section.
[7.34.2.5 NMAC - Rp, 7.34.2.5 NMAC, 2/27/2015]
7.34.2.6 OBJECTIVE: The objective ofthis part is to establish membership, duties, responsibilities, and public
hearing procedures that govern the medical cannabis advisory board proceedings.
[7.34.2 .6 NMAC- Rp, 7.34.2.6 NMAC, 2/27/2015]
7.34.2.7 DEFINITIONS:
A. "Act" means the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act, NMSA 1978, Sections 26-2B-1 through 26-2B-7.
B. "Adequate supply" means an amount of cannabis, derived solely from an intrastate source and in a form
approved by the department, that is possessed by a qualified patient or collectively possessed by a qualified patient and the
qualified patient's primary caregiver, that is determined by the department to be no more than reasonably necessary to ensure
the uninterrupted availability of cannabis for a period of three months or 90 consecutive calendar days.
C. "Administrative review conunittee" means an intra-department committee that reviews qualified patient
or primary caregiver application denials, licensed producer denials made by the program manager, or the imposition of a
summary suspension, in accordance with department rules. The administrative review committee shall consist of the chief
medical officer of the department (or that's person's designee); a deputy secretary of the department (or that person's designee),
and the chief nursing officer of the department (or that person's designee ).
D. "Administrative withdrawal" means the procedure for the voluntary withdrawal of a qualified patient or
primary caregiver from the medical cannabis program.
E. "Advisory board'' means the medical cannabis advisory board consisting of eight practitioners
representing the fields of neurology, pain management, medical oncology, psychiatry, infectious disease, family medicine, and
gynecology.
R "Applicant" means any person applying for enrollment or re-enrollment in the medical cannabis program as
a qualified patient, primary caregiver, or licensed producer.
G. "Approved laboratory" means a laboratory that has been approved by the department specifically for the
testing of cannabis, concentrates, and cannabis derived products.
H. "Batch" means, with regard to usable cannabis, a homogenous, identified quantity of cannabis harvested
during a specified time period from a specified cultivation area, and with regard to concentrated and cannabis-derived product,
means an identified quantity that is uniform, that is intended to meet specifications for identity, strength, and composition, and
that is manufactured, packaged, and labeled during a specified time period according to a single manufacturing, packaging, and
labeling protocol.
I. "Cannabidiol ("CBD")" is a cannabinoid and the primary non-psychoactive ingredient found in cannabis.
J. "Cannabis" means all parts of the plant, cannabis sativa, and cannabis indica, whether growing or not and
the resin extracted from any part of the plant.
K "Cannabis-derived product" means a product, other than cannabis itself, which contains or is derived
from cannabis, not including hemp.
L. "Concentrated cannabis-derived product ("concentrate")" means a cannabis-derived product that is
manufactured by a mechanical or chemical process that separates any cannabinoid from the cannabis plant, and that contains (or
that is intended to contain at the time of sale or distribution) no less than thirty-percent (30%) THC by weight.
1 of7 4/14/2015 8: 19 AM
7.34.2 NMAC http:/1164.64.110.239/nmac/parts/title07 /07 .034.0002.htm
M. "Courier'' means a person or entity that transports usable cannabis within the state of New Mexico from a
licensed non-profit producer to a qualified patient or primary caregiver.
N. "Debilitating medical condition'' means:
(1) cancer;
(2) glaucoma;
(3) multiple sclerosis;
(4) damage to the nervous tissue of the spinal cord, with objective neurological indication of
intractable spasticity;
(5) epilepsy;
(6) positive status for human immunodeficiency virus or acquired immune deficiency syndrome;
(7) admission into hospice care in accordance with rules promulgated by the department; or
(8) any other medical condition, medical treatment, or disease as approved by the department which
results in pain, suffering, or debility for which there is credible evidence that medical use cannabis could be of benefit.
0. ''Department" means the department of health or its agent.
P. "Facility" means any building, space, or grounds licensed for the production, possession, testing,
manufacturing, or distribution of cannabis, concentrates, or cannabis-derived products.
Q. "Intrastate" means existing or occurring within the state boundaries of New Mexico.
R. "Laboratory applicant" means a laboratory that seeks to become an approved laboratory, or that seeks
renewal of approval as an approved laboratory, in accordance with this rule.
S. "License" means the document issued by the department granting the legal right to produce medical
cannabis for a specified period of time.
T. "Licensed producer'' means a person or entity licensed to produce medical cannabis.
U. "Licensure" means the process by which the department grants permission to an applicant to produce
cannabis.
V. "Lot" means an identified portion of a batch, that is uniform and that is intended to meet specifications for
identity, strength, and composition; or, in the case of a cannabis-derived product or concentrate, an identified quantity produced
in a specified period of time in a manner that is uniform and that is intended to meet specifications for identity, strength, and
composition.
W. "Male plant" means a male cannabis plant.
X. "Manufacture" means to make or otherwise produce cannabis-derived product or concentrate.
Y. "Manufacturer'' means a business entity that manufactures cannabis-derived product that has been
approved for this purpose by the medical cannabis program.
Z. "Mature female plant" means a harvestable female cannabis plant that is flowering.
AA. "Medical cannabis program" means the administrative body of the department charged with the
management of the medical cannabis program and enforcement of program regulations, to include issuance of registry
identification cards, licensing of producers, and regulation of manufacturing and distribution.
BB. "Medical cannabis program manager'' means the administrator of the medical cannabis program who
holds that title.
CC. "Medical director'' means a medical practitioner designated by the department to determine whether the
medical condition of an applicant qualifies as a debilitating medical condition eligible for enrollment in the program, and to
perform other duties.
DD. "Medical provider certification for patient eligibility fomi' means a written certification form provided
by the medical cannabis program signed by a patient's practitioner that, in the practitioner's professional opinion, the patient has
a debilitating medical condition as defined by the act or this part and would be anticipated to benefit from the use of cannabis.
EE. "Minor'' means an individual less than 18 years of age.
FF. "Paraphernalia" means any equipment, product, or material of any kind that is primarily intended or
designed for use in compounding, converting, processing, preparing, inhaling, or otherwise introducing cannabis or its
derivatives into the human body.
GG. "Patient enrollment/re-enrollment fomi' means the registry identification card application form for
patient applicants provided by the medical cannabis program.
UH. "Personal production license" means a license issued to a qualified patient participating in the medical
cannabis program, to permit the qualified patient to produce medical cannabis for the qualified patient's personal use, consistent
with the requirements of department rule.
Il. "Petitioner'' means any New Mexico resident or association of New Mexico residents petitioning the
advisory board for the inclusion of a new medical condition, medical treatment, or disease to be added to the list of debilitating
medical conditions that qualify for the use of cannabis.
JJ. "Plant" means any cannabis plant, cutting, or clone that has roots or that is cultivated with the intention of
growing roots.
KK. "Policy" means a written statement of principles that guides and determines present and future decisions and
7.34.2.9 PETITIONREQUIREMENTS:
A. Petition requirements. The advisor y b ard may acce pt and r vi w petitions from any individu al or
association of individual s reques ting th additi on o f a new medical co ndition, medical lr atment or dis ease for the purpose of
parti cipating in the medical cannabis progra m and all lawful privil eges under the· cl. Except as otherwi se provided, a
petitioner filing a petition shall Iii the petition and a copy with lhe medica l ca nnabis pro gram staff by either personal delivery
or certified mail. In order for a petition to be proce ed and forwarded to the advisory board the following information shall be
submitted to ilie medical cannabis program staff.
(1) Petition format: Unless therwi e pr vided by this part or by order of the hearin g officer all
doc ument except exhibi ts, shall be prepar ed on 8 .1/2 x 11-inch whit pap r, print ed double-s ided, if possibl e, and where
appropri ate, the fir st page of e very document shall contain a heading ru1dcaption. Th petitioner shalJ include in the petition
documents a narrati ve address 10 the advi sory board , which includes:
(a) petition caption stating the name, address and telephone number of the petitioner and
ilie medical condition, medical treatment or disease sought to be added to the existing debilitating medical conditions;
(b) an index of the contents of th petiti on, an introductory narrative of the individual or
association of individuals requesting the inclusion of a new medical condition, medi cal treatment or dise a e Lo includ e the
individual or association of individuals' relationship or interest for ilie request whether that interest is professional or as a
concerned citiren;
(c) the proposed benefits from ilie medical use of cannabis specific to the medical
condition , medical treatment or disease sought to be added to the existing debilitating medical conditions listed under the act;
and
(d) any additional supporting medical, testimonial, or scientific documentation.
(2) Statement of intent to present technical evidence: If the petitioner wishes to present technical
evidence at the hearing , the petition shall include a statement of intent. The statement of intent to present technical evidence
shall include:
(a) the name of the person filing the statement ;
(b) the name of each witness;
(c) an estimate of the length of the direct testimony of each witness ;
(d) a list of exhibits, if any, to be offered into evidence at the hearing; and
(e) a summary or outline of the anticipated direct testimony of each witness.
B. Qt.Jalifiedpatient applicant petitioner: If the petition er is submitting their requests as a potential qualified
patient appli cant the petitioner shall attach an original medical practition er 's certifi cation for patient eligibility form provid ed
by the medical ca nna is program manager or de ignee which includes the following information :
(1) the name, address, telephone number and clinical licensure of the petitioner's practitioner;
(2) ilie medical justification for practitioner's certification of the petitioner's debilitating medical
condition;
(3) ilie practitioner's signature and date of signature;
(4) ilie name, address and date of birth of ilie petitioner ;
(5) the name, address and telephone number of the petitioner's practitioner;
(6) a reasonable xerographic copy of the petitioner's New Mexico driver's license or comparable
New Mexico state or federal issued photo identification card verifying New Mexico residence;
(7) documented parental consent if applicable to the petitioner;
(8) if applicable, the petitioner's potential debilitating medical condition;
(9) the length of time the petitioner has been under the care of the practitioner providing the medical
provider certification for pati ent eligibility;
(10) the petitioner's signature and date ; and
(11) a signed consent for release of medical information form provided by the medical cannabis
program
C. Petitioner confidentiality: The department shall maintain a confidential file containing the names and
addresses of the persons who have either applied for or received a public hearing petition request. Individual names on the list
shall be confidential and not subject to disclosure, except:
(1) to authorized employees or agents of the department as necessary to perform the duties of the
department pursuant to the provisions of the act or this part;
(2) as provided in the federal Health Ins urance Portability and Acco untability Act of 1996.
D. Department notification: The medical cannabis program manager or de ignee "haJI review each petition
request and within reas nable lime a fter rece ipt issue notice of docketing upon the petitioner, each ad vis ry board member, and
the advi sory board legal c unsel. The notice of docketing shall contain the petition caption and d cket number, the date upon
wh.icb the petiti.on was rece ived and scheduling date of the advi ory board public hearing. A copy of thi rule shall be included
with a notice of docketing sent to the petitioner.
E. Examination allowed: Subject to the provisions of law restricting the public disclosure of confidential
information , any person may, during normal busi11es ' hours, inspect and copy any document filed in any public hearing
proc eeding. Inspection shall be permitted in acco rdance wilh the ln spec tion of Public Records Act, ections 14-2- J et seq.,
NMSA 1978, but may be limited by tl1e Health losw·ance Pbrtability and Accountability Act or1996. Document ·ubject to
inspection shall be made availabl e by ll1e medical cannabis program manager, or designee as appropri ate. Unles · waiv ed by the
department, the cost o f duplic ati.ng doc uments or audio filed in any public hearing proceeding shall be borne by the person
seeking the copies.
F. Notice of withdrawal: A petitioner may withdraw a petition at any time prior to a decision by the advisory
board by filing a notice of withdrawal with the medical cannabis program manager or designee.
(7.34 .2.9 NMAC - Rp, 7.34.2 .9 NMAC , 2/27/2015]
(5) a list of exhibits, if any, to be offered into evidence at the hearing; and
(6) a summary or outline of the anticipated direct testimony of each witness.
G. Ex parte discussions: At no time after the initiation and before the conclusion of the petition process under
this part, shall the department, or any other party, interested participant or their representatives discuss ex parte the merits of the
petitions with any advisory board member.
H. Public hearing process: The advisory board chairperson shall conduct the public hearing so as to provide
a reasonable opportunity for all interested persons to be heard without making the hearing unreasonably lengthy or cumbersome
or burdening the record with unnecessary repetition .
(1) A quorum of the advisory board shall consist of three voting members.
(2) The advisory board chairperson or alternate shall convene each public hearing by:
(a) introduction of the advisory board members;
(b) statutory authority of the board;
(c) statement of the public hearing agenda; and
(d) recognition of the petitioner.
(3) Petitioner comment period. The petitioner or by representative may present evidence to the
advisory board . The advisory board shall only consider findings of fact or scientific conclusions of medical evidence presented
by the petitioner or by representative to the advisory board prior to or contemporaneously with the public hearing.
(4) Public comment period: The advisory board may provide for a public comment period. Public
comment may be by written comment, verbal or both.
(a) Written comment: Any individual or association of individuals may submit written
comment to the advisory board either in opposition or support of the inclusion of a medical conditions, medical treatments or
diseases to the existing list of debilitating medical conditions contained under the act. All written comment shall adhere to the
requirements of Subsection F of this section.
(b) Public comment: Any member of the general public may testify at the public hearing.
No pri or nod tication is requir ed to present general non-technical talements in support of or in pposition to the petition. Any
such mem er may also offer exhibits in connection with hi testimony, so long as lbe exhibit is n n-technical in natw·c and not
unduly repetitious of the testimony.
I. Recording the hearing: Un1e s the advisory board orders otherwise , the hear ing will be audio rec orded.
Any person, other than the advisory board, desiring a copy of the audio tapes must arr ange copying with the medical cannabis
program r de ig11 ee at their own expense.
[7.34.2.l ONMA - Rp, 7.34.2. 10 NMAC, 2/27/2015]
7.34.2.12 SEVERABILITY: If any part or application of these rules is held to be invalid, the remainder or its
applicati on to other situations or persons shall not be affected. Failure to promulgate rules or implement any provision of these
rules shall not interfere with the remaining protections provided by these rules and the act.
[7.34 .2.12 NMAC- Rp, 7.34.2.12 NMAC, 2/27/2015]
NMAC History:
7.34.2 NMAC, Advisory Board Responsibilities and Duties (filed 03/19/2008) was replaced by 7.34.2 NMAC, Advisory
Board Resp nsibiliti es and Duties, effec tjve 12/30/20 10.
7.34 .2 NMAC, Advisory Board Resp nsibilities and Duties (filed 12/16/2010) was replaced by 7.34 .2 NMAC, Advisory
'•i Board Responsibilities and Duties, effective 02/27/2015.
7 of7 4/14/2015 8: 19 AM
Exhibit 4
Medical Cannabis Program
Website: www.nmhealth.org/go/mcp Telephone Number: 505-827-2321
If you are a patient or caregiver and want to grow your own medical cannabis, complete and send in the
application for a Personal Production License (PPL).
Revised 6-14-2019
Medical Cannabis Program
Website: www.nmhealth.org/go/mcp Telephone Number: 505-827-2321
Questions in this box are optional. Your answers help us better serve people in the program.
If you don’t want to answer something, leave it blank.
Please check the race or ethnicity you call yourself. Check all that apply.
American Indian or Alaska Native Latino or Hispanic American
Tribe: __________________ □ Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
□ Asian □ White
□ Black or African American □ Other:
Are you a Veteran? Yes No Language you speak most often:
Applicant Signature: I have included a COPY OF MY NM STATE ID. By signing below, I agree that:
All the information given above is complete and correct.
I will follow the limits and restrictions on my right to have and use medical cannabis that are in the laws of New
Mexico (the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act and the New Mexico Administrative Code 7.34.3). These laws
are on the program’s website at: nmhealth.org/go/mcp.
I allow the New Mexico Department of Health, Medical Cannabis Program to discuss my medical condition,
including treatment records, test results and evaluations specific to enrollment in the Medical Cannabis Program
with the medical provider(s) named in this application.
Mail to: DOH - Medical Cannabis Program; 1190 S St. Francis Dr.; PO Box 26110; Santa Fe, NM; 87502-6110
NMDOH USE
Date Card Printed: ____________ Reviewed By: _______________ Caregiver App Attached: ☐ YES ☐ NO
PPL App Attached: ☐ YES ☐ NO Check Number: _____________
Disclosure Form on File: ☐ YES ☐ NO Unit Increase Letter Attached: ☐ YES ☐ NO
Page 1 of 2 Please send all pages at the same time Revised 6-14-2019
Medical Cannabis Program
Website: www.nmhealth.org/go/mcp Telephone Number: 505-827-2321
Based on your examination of the patient, by signing below you are certifying everything below:
• The patient’s condition is chronic and debilitating.
• You have discussed the potential risks and benefits with the patient. You find that the potential health benefits of
the medical use of cannabis likely outweigh the health risks for the patient.
• You understand the Medical Cannabis Program needs clinical records annually for verification purposes.
• You are licensed in New Mexico to prescribe and administer drugs that are subject to the Controlled Substances
Act and your primary practice is in New Mexico.
Medical Provider Signature: Date:
(Please print form - then sign) (Must be dated within 90 days of receipt by program)
NMDOH USE
Program Staff Signature: Date:
□ Approved ☐ Denied ☐ Additional notes in BioTrack
Page 2 of 2 Please send all pages at the same time Revised 6-14-2019
Medical Cannabis Program
Website: www.nmhealth.org/go/mcp Telephone Number: 505-827-2321
Page 1 - Completed by the patient including their name, demographics, current address, current
telephone number, and original signature (photocopies not accepted).
Page 2 - Filled out by a medical provider (e.g. Doctor, Nurse Practitioner, prescribing Psychologist,
Dentist, etc. who is allowed by law to prescribe controlled substances in the state of New
Mexico). Please Note: Resident Physicians and Fellows do not have the credentials
necessary to meet regulatory requirements. Please have attending physicians complete the
certification.
o Ensure the following information is present:
• Patient’s legal name and date of birth (matching the patient’s state ID);
• Address where the exam took place and how long this patient has been in your care;
• Reason for provider’s certification (i.e., approved condition/diagnosis):
Check all conditions that apply to the patient and circle the primary certifying
condition.
• Provider’s information:
Name, clinical license held, and board specialty.
NM Medical License number.
Federal DEA License number.
NM Controlled Substance License number.
Office address, mailing address, phone number, and fax number.
• Original provider signature and date (photocopies not accepted).
o Medical notes must be attached to confirm the qualifying condition(s) for the patient’s
application. Ensure these materials are submitted with the application.
All original pages of the application, a photocopy of the patient’s current New Mexico State ID (i.e.,
driver’s license or state issued ID card) and supporting documents should be sent together. This may
be done by the patient or the practitioner.
A practitioner shall not be subject to arrest or prosecution, penalized in any manner or denied any
right or privilege for recommending the medical use of cannabis or providing written certification for
the medical use of cannabis as per NM statue.
Revised 6-14-2019
JOHN R. KROGER MARY H. WILLIAMS
Attorney General Deputy Attorney General
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
GENERAL COUNSEL DIVISION
You asked two questions concerning Oregon’s Medical Marijuana Act, which were
prompted by a recent decision of the Oregon Court of Appeals, State v. Berringer, 234 Or App
665, 229 P3d 615 (2010) (April 14, 2010). Your questions concern whether the Oregon Health
Authority must issue medical marijuana registry identification cards to non-Oregon residents.
Does the Oregon Medical Marijuana Act limit the issuance of registry identification cards
to Oregon residents?
SHORT ANSWER
No. Residency is not a requirement for obtaining a registry identification card under the
Oregon Medical Marijuana Act.
Could the Oregon legislature limit eligibility for Oregon registry identification cards to
Oregon residents without violating the right to travel guaranteed by the United States
Constitution?
SHORT ANSWER
Yes.
Exhibit 5
DISCUSSION
1. Background
The Oregon Medical Marijuana Act (OMMA), ORS 475.300 to 475.346, allows a person
who possesses a registry identification card to engage (as delimited by the Act) in the medical
use of marijuana without being subjected to state criminal or civil penalties. ORS 475.306(1);
ORS 475.300(2). ORS 475.309 establishes the requirements that an applicant must fulfill to
receive a card. The Oregon Health Authority (OHA) is responsible for establishing and
maintaining a program to issue cards “to persons who meet the requirements of [ORS 475.309].”
ORS 475.309(2).
The Oregon Court of Appeals recently discussed those requirements in State v. Berringer.
Some people have informed the OHA that they interpret that opinion to require the OHA to issue
Oregon registry identification cards to non-residents. In light of that contention, you ask whether
non-residents are eligible to receive Oregon cards under OMMA, and whether it would violate
the United States Constitution to deny cards to non-residents.
2. State v. Berringer
In State v. Berringer, the defendant, a California resident, was arrested in Oregon and
convicted under Oregon law for unlawful possession of marijuana. The defendant had a written
statement by a California licensed physician recommending defendant’s medical use of
marijuana. Under California law, that document, if authentic, would allow the defendant to
possess marijuana. 23 Or App at 668. Defendant appealed his Oregon conviction, raising two
federal constitutional challenges, only one of which is relevant.
Defendant argued that in enforcing Oregon’s criminal law against him for possessing
marijuana, the state violated his federal constitutional right to travel from state to state, because
Oregon “provides its own residents with an immunity from some possession of marijuana
prosecutions, while withholding that immunity from nonresidents.” Id.at 671. The court
observed that, although the right to travel is well established, its source in the United States
Constitution has never been definitively identified. Id. at 672. Several United States Supreme
Court cases have located the right in the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV, section
2, guaranteeing the right to enjoy the “Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several
states.” Id. at 672. But another Supreme Court case relied on the Equal Protection Clause, and
still another case concluded that there was no need to identify the particular constitutional
provision for the right to travel interstate. Id.
While the source of the right is not completely clear, the court noted that it is clear that
access to medical treatment is among the interstate traveler’s protected rights based on two cases.
In the first case, the United States Supreme Court invalidated a state law that imposed a one-year
durational residence requirement to obtain access to publicly funded non-emergency
hospitalization and medical care. Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa County, 415 US 250, 94 S Ct
1076, 39 L Ed2d 306 (1974). In the second case, the Court invalidated a state law that imposed a
Grant Higginson, Administrator
June 14, 2010
Page 3
residence requirement to obtain an abortion. Doe v. Bolton, 410 US 179, 200, 93 S Ct 739, 35 L
Ed2d 201 (1973).
The Oregon Court of Appeals distinguished the OMMA from both of those laws,
interpreting it to impose the same requirements on residents and non-residents. The court
reached that conclusion despite “findings” in ORS 475.300 that the Act is intended to allow
“Oregonians” to make medical use of marijuana without fear of penalty:
It is true that the “findings” section of the OMMA refers to “Oregonians” with
debilitating medical conditions and states that they “should be allowed to use
small amounts of marijuana without fear of civil or criminal penalties,” ORS
475.300(2), and “discuss freely with their doctors the possible risks and benefits
of medical marijuana,” ORS 475.300(3). Those provisions are merely hortatory.
The operational provisions of the OMMA and its implementing regulations apply
with equal rigor to residents and nonresidents. Residents and nonresidents alike
must either possess or have applied for an OMMA registration card. ORS
475.309(1) (a). Both must have documentation from the attending physician,
attesting that the person has “a debilitating medical condition and that the medical
use of marijuana may mitigate the symptoms or effects” of the condition. ORS
475.309(2). Both must pay the same registration fee. Id.
But the court acknowledged that OMMA makes it more difficult for nonresidents to
obtain a registry card because an applicant must submit documentation from a physician licensed
under Oregon laws. Id. The court pointed out that the difficulty that this placed on non-residents
was somewhat mitigated by the fact that Oregon physician licensing laws contain reciprocity
provisions allowing nonresident physicians to obtain Oregon licenses and that under OHA rules,
a nonresident need not have a long-term relationship with an Oregon physician. Id. In any
event, the court concluded that “we have found no authority for the proposition that the difficulty
a nonresident might encounter in finding an Oregon attending physician could be considered an
impediment of constitutional magnitude.” Id.
The court then examined OAR 333-008-0020(1), which sets out the forms of
identification that the OHA will accept from an applicant:
***
[E]ven if Oregon law made access to medical marijuana more difficult for
nonresidents, that would not violate defendant's right to travel. As the Supreme
Court has explained:
Id. at 674-75. Accordingly, the court rejected the defendant’s constitutional claim.
3. ORS 475.309
You ask whether ORS 475.309 denies nonresidents eligibility for Oregon registry
identification cards. As discussed, the court in Berringer interpreted ORS 475.309 to allow
Grant Higginson, Administrator
June 14, 2010
Page 5
nonresidents to obtain registry identification cards. Although that part of the opinion may have
been dicta, (the court ultimately concluding that access to a particular drug was not a privilege
protected by the Constitution), we agree with the interpretation. See Stephens v. Bohlman, 314
Or 344, 350, 838 P2d 600 (1992) (when the Oregon Supreme Court has construed the text of a
statute, that construction is considered part of the text of the statute itself); SAIF Corp. v. Allen,
320 Or 192, 204, 881 P2d 773 (1994) (prior Supreme Court interpretation that appears in dictum
does not have the same effect); Younger v. City of Portland, 305 Or 346, 350 n 5, 752 P2d 262
(1988) (Court of Appeals interpretations do not have the same effect as Supreme Court
interpretations).
In construing statutes, we first examine the text in context. PGE v. Bureau of Labor and
Industries, 317 Or 606, 610-611, 859 P2d 1143 (1993). In doing so, we apply statutory and
judicial rules for reading text and context, such as not to omit what has been inserted or to insert
what has been omitted. Id., ORS 174.010. Statutory context includes other provisions of the
same statute and related statutes. PGE, 317 Or at 610. Courts also examine the legislative
history if it is useful to the analysis. State v. Gaines, 346 Or 160, 171-172, 206 P3d 1042 (2009).
If a statute remains ambiguous after examining the text, context, and legislative history, courts
will resort to relevant canons of construction, such as to assume that the legislature would have
intended the construction that would avoid potential constitutional problems. See, e.g., State v.
Stoneman, 323 Or 536, 540 n 5, 920 P2d 535 (1996).
(2) The Oregon Health Authority shall establish and maintain a program for the
issuance of registry identification cards to persons who meet the requirements of
this section. Except as provided in subsection (3) of this section, the authority
shall issue a registry identification card to any person who pays a fee in the
amount established by the authority and provides the following:
(a) Valid, written documentation from the person’s attending physician stating
that the person has been diagnosed with a debilitating medical condition and that
the medical use of marijuana may mitigate the symptoms or effects of the
person’s debilitating medical condition;[1/]
(c) The name, address and telephone number of the person’s attending physician;
(d) The name and address of the person’s designated primary caregiver, if the
person has designated a primary caregiver at the time of application; and
(e) A written statement that indicates whether the marijuana used by the
cardholder will be produced at a location where the cardholder or designated
primary caregiver is present or at another location.
***
Grant Higginson, Administrator
June 14, 2010
Page 6
(5)(b) In addition to the authority granted to the authority under ORS 475.316
to deny an application, [ORS 475.316 grants OHA the discretion to deny an
application for up to six months if it finds that the applicant has “willfully violated
the provisions of ORS 475.300 to 475.346, or rules adopted under ORS 475.300
to 475.346”] the authority may deny an application for the following reasons:
(A) The applicant did not provide the information required pursuant to this section
to establish the applicant’s debilitating medical condition and to document the
applicant’s consultation with an attending physician regarding the medical use of
marijuana in connection with such condition, as provided in subsection (2) and (3)
of this section;
(B) The authority determines that the information provided was falsified; or
(C) The applicant has been prohibited by a court order from obtaining a registry
identification card.
* * *.
Emphasis added.
In sum, ORS 475.309 requires the OHA to issue cards to “persons” who meet its
requirements. Those requirements are paying a fee and providing the listed documents and
information. None of those documents or required information includes proof of residency. Nor
do any definitional terms contain a residency requirement. Cf RCW 69.51A.010(3) (defining a
“qualifying patient” for purposes of Washington’s medical marijuana law as, among other things,
“a resident of the state of Washington at the time of such diagnosis”).
In addition, ORS 475.309 and 475.316 specify the grounds on which the OHA may deny
an application. Lack of Oregon residency is not one of those grounds. Based on the plain text of
ORS 475.309 and 475.316, Oregon residency is not a requirement to obtain an Oregon registry
identification card and lack of residency is not a ground for denial.
But text must be read in context. Statutory statements of general policy can provide
context for particular substantive provisions. See, e.g., Havi Group, L P v. Fyock, 204 Or App
558, 131 P3d 793 (2006). As the court discussed in Berringer, ORS 475.300 states that “ORS
475.300 to 475.346 are intended to allow Oregonians” to discuss medical marijuana use with
their doctors and that “Oregonians” should be allowed to use medical marijuana without fear of
Grant Higginson, Administrator
June 14, 2010
Page 7
penalty. The Court of Appeals declared those provisions to be merely “hortatory” and to have no
substantive effect.
We agree. Although general policy statements can be useful context, they should not be
relied on as authority to insert a requirement that specific and unambiguous substantive
provisions do not contain. See Astleford v. SAIF Corp, 319 Or 225, 234, 874 P2d 1329 (1994)
(general hortatory policy statements did not overcome the statutory definition of “party” or say
anything about statutory rights); Pharma v. Oregon Depart of Human Services ex rel Office of
Medical Assistance Programs, 199 Or App 199, 208, 110 P3d 657 (2005) (statement of policy by
its terms “imposes no requirement that the agency do anything.”); Northwest Natural Gas Co. v.
PUC, 195 Or App 547, 556, 99 P3d 292 (2004) (statutory statements of policy may serve as
useful context for a statute, but courts should be cautious about reading more into them); School
Dist. No. 1 v. Teachers' Retirement, 30 Or App 747, 752, 567 P2d 1080 (1977), rev. den., 281 Or
1 (1978) (“hortatory” phrasing of statutory purpose “does not appear to mandate anything that is
justiciable”); see also ORS 174.010 (office of judge is not to insert what has been omitted); ORS
174.020 (a particular intent controls over a general intent).
Finally, the legislative history does not support interpreting the OMMA to limit card
eligibility solely to Oregon residents. The OMMA was enacted by the people through the
initiative process. Or Laws 1999, ch 4. Relevant history of an initiative petition includes the
ballot title and explanatory statement in the voters’ pamphlet. See Shilo Inn v. Multnomah
County, 333 Or 101, 129-30, 36 P3d 954 (2001), modified on recons. 334 Or 11, 45 P3d 107
(2002). Neither the ballot title nor the explanatory statement in the voters’ pamphlet declare or
imply that card eligibility is limited to Oregon residents. The ballot title makes no mention of
“Oregonians,” but simply refers to “the medical use of marijuana” generally and the explanatory
statement refers to eligible “persons,” not to eligible “Oregonians.” Official Voters’ Pamphlet,
General Election, Volume 1, Measures, November 3, 1998 at 148, 151.
4. U.S. Constitution
You next ask, in light of Berringer, whether the Oregon legislature could limit the
eligibility to receive an Oregon registry card to Oregon residents without violating the right to
travel guaranteed by the United States Constitution. The court in Berringer did not address that
question directly, because the defendant had not applied for or been denied an Oregon registry
card on the basis that he was not an Oregon resident. The court did address the question
indirectly when responding to defendant’s claim that Oregon provided immunity for medical
marijuana use to its own residents, but not to the residents of other states. The court concluded
that nonresidents would be eligible for Oregon cards under OMMA, but it did not hold that the
U.S. Constitution required that result. Instead, it merely construed the language of the statutes
and regulations as allowing nonresidents to obtain cards.
It is true that, in interpreting OHA’s rule concerning acceptable identification, the court
applied the “avoidance canon” – a rule of statutory construction under which courts faced with
an ambiguous statute (or in this case, regulation) will assume an intent to comply with
constitutional mandates. The court applied that rule to avoid “even the possibility of
constitutional infirmity[.]” Berringer, 234 Or App at 674. But the avoidance canon is a rule of
Grant Higginson, Administrator
June 14, 2010
Page 8
statutory construction and nothing more. Its application cannot be construed as a holding that a
contrary interpretation would violate the federal constitution.
And, in the end, the court concluded that “access to a particular drug is not a privilege
‘bearing upon the vitality of the Nation as a single entity.’” Id. In other words, access to a
particular drug is not a privilege that is protected by the federal constitutional right to travel. If
there is no federal constitutional right to access to a particular drug, nonresidents have no federal
constitutional right to an Oregon registry identification card. Thus, Berringer supports the
conclusion that limiting eligibility for Oregon cards to Oregon residents would not violate the
right to travel.
Another compelling ground supports that conclusion. The federal Controlled Substances
Act prohibits possessing, manufacturing, dispensing, and distributing marijuana. 21 USC §§
841(10), 844. Those prohibitions apply even when a person possesses, manufactures, dispenses,
or distributes marijuana for a medical use. United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers
Cooperative, 532 US 483, 494 and n 7, 121 S Ct 1711, 149 L Ed2d 722 (2001) (declining to find
a medical necessity defense to prohibition on distributing marijuana; holding applies equally to
other prohibited acts); see also Gonzales v. Raich, 545 US 1, 14, 125 S Ct 2195, 162 L Ed2d 1
(2005) (possession of marijuana is a proper subject of federal regulation because marijuana has a
“high potential for abuse, lack of any accepted medical use, and absence of any accepted safety
for use in medically supervised treatment”). Given that possession of medical marijuana violates
federal law and that the United States Supreme Court has upheld that law, access to medical
marijuana is not a right protected by the United States Constitution. We conclude that the federal
constitutional right to travel would not be violated by denying nonresidents eligibility for Oregon
registry identification cards.
CONCLUSION
We conclude that: (1) The OMMA contains no Oregon residency requirement for
obtaining an Oregon registry identification card; and, (2) the Oregon legislature could limit
eligibility for Oregon registry identification cards to Oregon residents without violating the
federal constitutional right to travel.
Sincerely,
David E. Leith
Associate Attorney General and
Chief General Counsel
General Counsel Division
DEL:mcg/2074600
ORS 475.302(1) defines “attending physician” to mean “a physician licensed under ORS
1/
chapter 677 who has primary responsibility for the care and treatment of a person diagnosed with a
debilitating medical condition.”
Exhibit 6
Exhibit 7
Exhibit 8