Bibliografia

Albert, H. (2007). Scienza giuridica ed ermeneutica. Il diritto come fatto sociale e il compito della
giurisprudenza. Ars interpretandi, 12(1), 31-0.

Aliotta, J. M. (1987). Combining Judges' Attributes and Case Characteristics: An Alternative

Approach to Explaining Supreme Court Decisionmaking. Judicature, 71, 277.

Anderson, P. W. (1988). The economy as an evolving complex system. Addison-Wesley.

Arthur, W. B. (1997). The economy as an evolving complex system II. Addison-Wesley.

Bacon, F. (1620). Novum organum. L.I, af. LXXIX.

Balasundaram, B., Butenko, S., & Hicks, I. V. (2011). Clique relaxations in social network analysis:
The maximum k-plex problem. Operations Research, 59(1), 133-142.

Barabási, A. L. (2004). Link. La scienza delle reti. Torino: Einaudi.

Barabási, A. L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. science, 286(5439),
509-512.

Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009, March). Gephi: an open source software for
exploring and manipulating networks. In Third international AAAI conference on weblogs and social
media.

Berry, B. J., Griffith, D. A., & Tiefelsdorf, M. R. (2008). From spatial analysis to geospatial science.
Geographical Analysis, 40(3), 229-238.

Bobbio, N. (1954). La teoria pura del diritto e i suoi critici. Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura
civile, 2(1954), 356.

Boero, R., Morini, M., & Sonnessa, M. (2006). Modelli per la complessità: la simulazione ad agenti
in economia. P. Terna (Ed.). Il mulino.

Bommarito II, M. J., Katz, D. M., Zelner, J. L., & Fowler, J. H. (2010). Distance measures for
dynamic citation networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 389(19), 4201-
4208.

Bommarito II, M. J., Katz, D., & Zelner, J. (2009, June). Law as a seamless web?: comparison of
various network representations of the united states supreme court corpus (1791-2005). In
Proceedings of the 12th international conference on artificial intelligence and law (pp. 234-235).
ACM.
Bonaventura L., Consoli A. (2009), La scelta dei criteri di priorità per il giudice penale: effetti sui
carichi pendenti e sul costo sociale, MPRA Paper, n. 14559.

Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social
sciences. science, 323(5916), 892-895.
Boulet, R., Mazzega, P., & Bourcier, D. (2009, September). Network analysis of the French
environmental code. In International Workshop on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems
(pp. 39-53). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Boulet, R., Mazzega, P., & Bourcier, D. (2011). A network approach to the French system of legal
codes—part I: analysis of a dense network. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 19(4), 333-355.

Boulton, G., Campbell, P., Collins, B., Elias, P., Hall, W., Laurie, G., ... & Walport, M. (2012).
Science as an open enterprise. The Royal Society.

Cecconi, F. (2013). Simulating Crime: Models, Methods, Tools. Informatica e diritto, 22(1), 181-
191.

Cioffi‐Revilla, C. (2010), Computational social science. WIREs Comp Stat, 2: 259-271.

Conte, R. (2016). Computational Social and Behavioral Science. In New Frontiers in the Study of
Social Phenomena (pp. 1-7). Springer, Cham.

Conte, R., Gilbert, N., Bonelli, G., Cioffi-Revilla, C., Deffuant, G., Kertesz, J., ... & Nowak, A.
(2012). Manifesto of computational social science. The European Physical Journal Special
Topics, 214(1), 325-346.

Contractor, N. S., Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2006). Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses
about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example. Academy of
Management Review, 31(3), 681-703 pag. 684.

de Sola Pool, I., & Kochen, M. (1978). Contacts and influence. Social networks, 1(1), 5-51.

Della Porta, D., & Keating, M. (Eds.). (2008). Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences:
A pluralist perspective. Cambridge University Press.

Doreian, P., & Stokman, F. N. (2003). Evolution of social networks: Part III. Special double issue of
Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 27(2), 3.

Doreian, P., & Stokman, F. N. (Eds.). (1997). Evolution of social networks (Vol. 1). Psychology
Press.
Drobak, J. N. (1971). Computer simulation and gaming: an interdisciplinary survey with a view
toward legal applications. Stan. L. Rev., 24, 712.

Eisenberg, T. (2011). The origins, nature, and promise of empirical legal studies and a response to
concerns. U. Ill. L. Rev., 1713.

Epstein, J. M. (1999). Agent‐based computational models and generative social science. Complexity,
4(5), 41-60.

Epstein, J. M. (2006). Generative social science: Studies in agent-based computational modeling.

Princeton University Press.

Epstein, Joshua M. (2008). 'Why Model?'. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation
11(4)12.

F. Bell (2016). Empirical Research in Law. Griffith Law Review, 25(2), 262-282.

Faro, S. (2014). Scienze sociali computazionali, diritto, informatica giuridica (verso la scienza
giuridica computazionale). In L’informatica giuridica in Italia. Cinquant’anni di studi, ricerche ed
esperienze (pp. 603-619). ESI.

Faro, S., Lettieri, N., eds. (2013). Law and Computational Social Science. Informatica e diritto.
Numero monografico.

Faulconbridge, J. R., Beaverstock, J. V., Muzio, D., & Taylor, P. J. (2007). Global law firms:
Globalization and organizational spaces of cross-border legal work. Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus., 28, 455.

Fowler, J. H., Johnson, T. R., Spriggs, J. F., Jeon, S., & Wahlbeck, P. J. (2007). Network analysis
and the law: Measuring the legal importance of precedents at the US Supreme Court. Political
Analysis, 15(3), 324-346.

Frankenreiter, J. (2017). Network analysis and the use of precedent in the case law of the cjeu-a reply
to derlen and lindholm. German LJ, 18, 687.

Freeman, L. (2004). The development of social network analysis. A Study in the Sociology of Science,
1.
Frosini, V. (1969). Scienza giuridica (voce), in Novissimo Digesto Italiano, Utet.

Gharajedaghi, J. (2006). Systems thinking: Managing chaos and complexity: A platform for designing
business architecture. Elsevier.
Granovetter, M. (2008). The Strength of Weak Ties (1973). American Journal of Sociology, 78(6),
1360-13.

Gros, C. (2010). Complex and Adaptive Dynamical Systems (pp. 157-190). Springer.

Grossi, P. (2000). Scienza giuridica italiana: un profilo storico: 1860-1950. Giuffrè.

Grossi, P. (2006). Società, diritto, stato: un recupero per il diritto (Vol. 70). Giuffrè Editore.

Guala, F. (2009). Esperimenti paradigmatici: il gioco dell’Ultimatum. Issue 10/07/09 HumanaMente.

Journal of Philosophical Studies.

Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. University of
California, Riverside. CA (Online book).

Hermann, T., & Hunt, A. (2011). The sonification handbook (pp. 399-425). J. G. Neuhoff (Ed.).
Berlin, Germany: Logos Verlag.

Holmes, O. W. Jr. (2010). Collected Legal Papers. Peter Smith.

Humphreys, P. (2004). Extending ourselves: Computational science, empiricism, and scientific

method. Oxford University Press.

Jeh, G., & Widom, J. (2002, July). SimRank: a measure of structural-context similarity. In
Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data
mining (pp. 538-543). ACM.

Katz, D. M., & Bommarito, M. J. (2014). Measuring the complexity of the law: the United States
Code. Artificial intelligence and law, 22(4), 337-374.

Katz, D. M., Gubler, J. R., Zelner, J., & Bommarito, M. J. (2011). Reproduction of Hierarchy-A
Social Network Analysis of the American Law Professoriate. J. legal edUC., 61, 76.

Kelsen, H. (1997). Problemi fondamentali della dottrina del diritto pubblico. Edizioni Scientifiche
Italiane.

Krebs, V. E. (2002). Mapping networks of terrorist cells. Connections, 24(3), 43-52.

Kronman, A. T. (1995). The lost lawyer: Failing ideals of the legal profession. Harvard University
Press pagg. 165-167.

Kruse, K. R. (2011-2012). Getting Real about Legal Realism, New Legal Realism, and Clinical Legal
Education. New York Law School Law Review 56(2), 659.
Lazega, E., & Snijders, T. A. (Eds.). (2015). Multilevel network analysis for the social sciences:
Theory, methods and applications (Vol. 12). Springer.

Lazega, E., & Van Duijn, M. (1997). Position in formal structure, personal characteristics and choices
of advisors in a law firm: A logistic regression model for dyadic network data. Social networks, 19(4),
375-397.

Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabási, A. L., Brewer, D., ... & Jebara, T. (2009).
Computational social science. Science, 323(5915), 721-723.

Leeuw, F. L. (2015). Empirical Legal Research The Gap between Facts and Values and Legal
Academic Training. Utrecht L. Rev., 11, 19.

Lentini, L., & Fornero, G. (1991). Popper. G. Fornero, La filosofia contemporanea, UTET, Turin,
585-678.

Lettieri, N. (2010). Artificialia. Possibili nuovi orizzonti della scienza giuridica.

Scienza&Filosofia(4), 41-52.

Lettieri, N. (2013). Ius in silico. Diritto, computazione e simulazione. ESI.

Lettieri, N. (2016). Computational Social Science, the Evolution of Policy Design and Rule Making
in Smart Societies. Future internet, 8(2), 19.

Lettieri, N., & Fabiani, E. (2016). Dati, computazione, scienza: estendere i confini del processo civile
telematico. Scritti dedicati a Maurizio Converso.

Lettieri, N., Altamura, A., Faggiano, A., & Malandrino, D. (2016). A computational approach for the
experimental study of EU case law: analysis and implementation. Social Network Analysis and
Mining, 6(1), 56.

Lettieri, N., Altamura, A., Giugno, R., Guarino, A., Malandrino, D., Pulvirenti, A., ... & Zaccagnino,
R. (2018). Ex Machina: Analytical platforms, Law and the Challenges of Computational Legal
Science. Future Internet, 10(5), 37.

Lettieri, N., Altamura, A., Malandrino, D., & Punzo, V. (2017, September). Agents Shaping
Networks Shaping Agents: Integrating Social Network Analysis and Agent-Based Modeling in
Computational Crime Research. In EPIA Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 15-27). Springer,
Cham.
Lettieri, N., Faro, S., Malandrino, D., Faggiano, A., & Vestoso, M. (2015). Network, Visualization,
Analytics. A Tool Allowing Legal Scholars to Experimentally Investigate EU Case Law. In AI
Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems (pp. 543-555). Springer, Cham.

Lettieri, N., Malandrino, D., & Spinelli, R. (2014). From Structure to Function. Exploring the Use of
Text and Social Network Analysis in Criminal Investigations. In Network Analysis in Law (pp. 79-
94). Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.

Lettieri, N., Malandrino, D., & Vicidomini, L. (2017). By investigation, I mean computation. Trends
in Organized Crime, 20(1-2), 31-54.

Lettieri, N., Malandrino, D., Giuffrida, G., & Spinelli, R. (2013). Text and (social) network analysis
as investigative tools: a case study. Informatica e diritto, 22(1), 263-280.

Liu, L. (Ed.). (2008). Artificial crime analysis systems: using computer simulations and geographic
information systems. Igi Global.

Martin, A. D., Quinn, K. M., & Epstein, L. (2004). The median justice on the united states supreme
court. NCL rev., 83, 1275.

Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: una rivoluzione che trasformerà il nostro
modo di vivere e già minaccia la nostra libertà. Garzanti

Mazzega, P., Bourcier, D., & Boulet, R. (2009, June). The network of French legal codes. In
Proceedings of the 12th international conference on artificial intelligence and law (pp. 236-237).
ACM.

Memon, N., & Larsen, H. L. (2006, May). Practical algorithms for destabilizing terrorist networks.
In International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (pp. 389-400). Springer, Berlin,
Heidelberg.

Mende, J. (2005). The poverty of empiricism. Informing Science: the International Journal of an
Emerging Transdiscipline, 8, 189-211.

Merlino, A. (2012). Storia di Kelsen: la recezione della 'Reine Rechtslehre' in Italia. Ed. Scientifica.

Merryman, J. H. (1953). The authority of authority: What the California Supreme Court cited in 1950.
Stan. L. Rev., 6, 613.

Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem. Psychology today, 2(1), 60-67.

Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity: A guided tour. Oxford University Press.

Mosleh, M., & Heydari, B. (2017). Fair topologies: community structures and network hubs drive
emergence of fairness norms. Scientific reports, 7(1), 2686.

Newman, M., Barabasi, A. L., & Watts, D. J. (2011). The structure and dynamics of networks (Vol.
12). Princeton University Press.

Niblett, A. (2010). Do judges cherry pick precedents to justify extralegal decisions: A statistical
examination. Md. L. Rev., 70, 234.

Parisi, D. (1998). La naturalizzazione della cultura.

Parisi, D. (2014). Future robots: towards a robotic science of human beings (Vol. 7). John Benjamins
Publishing Company.

Pluchino, A. (2016). 10 pillole di complessità. Una guida per capire la rivoluzione scientifica in
corso. Malcor D’.

Posner, R. A. (1986). The decline of law as an autonomous discipline: 1962-1987. Harv. L. Rev., 100,
761.

Punzo, V. (2013). Agent-based approach to crime and criminal justice policy analysis. Informatica
e diritto, 22(1), 193-210.

Qin, J., Xu, J. J., Hu, D., Sageman, M., & Chen, H. (2005, May). Analyzing terrorist networks: A
case study of the global salafi jihad network. In International Conference on Intelligence and Security
Informatics (pp. 287-304). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Robinson, R. (2009). Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals and the Local Construction of
Reliability. Alb. LJ Sci. & Tech., 19, 39.

Romano, S. (1946). L'ordinamento giuridico. Sansoni.

Ruhl, J. B. (2007). Law's complexity: a primer. Ga. St. UL Rev., 24, 885.

Salvini, A. (2005). L'analisi delle reti sociali. Risorse e meccanismi (Vol. 1, pp. 1-192). Pisa
University Press.

Sandgren, C. (2000). On empirical Legal Science. Scandinavian Stud. L., 40, 445.

Savoia, L. (2007). L'analisi della dinamica del network con SIENA. Analisi delle reti sociali. Teorie,
metodi, applicazioni. Franco Angeli.

Scaglione, A. (2011). Reti mafiose. Cosa Nostra e Camorra: organizzazioni criminali a confronto.
FrancoAngeli.
Scarpelli, U. (1971). Il metodo giuridico. Rivista di diritto processuale, 4(1971), 554.

Smits, J. M. (2012). The mind and method of the legal academic. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Snijders, T. A. (2005). Models for longitudinal network data. Models and methods in social network
analysis, 1, 215-247.

Snijders, T. A., & Baerveldt, C. (2003). A multilevel network study of the effects of delinquent
behavior on friendship evolution. Journal of mathematical sociology, 27(2-3), 123-151.

Solberg, R. S., & Lindquist, S. A. (2006). Activism, ideology, and federalism: Judicial behavior in
constitutional challenges before the Rehnquist Court, 1986–2000. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies,
3(2), 237-261.

Squazzoni, F. (2009). Simulazione sociale: modelli ad agenti nell'analisi sociologica. Carocci.

Squazzoni, F. (2014). A social science‐inspired complexity policy: Beyond the mantra of

incentivization. Complexity, 19(6), 5-13.

Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world (No.
HD30. 2 S7835 2000).
Stock, O. (Ed.). (1994). Intelligenza artificiale: aree di ricerca, tendenze, prospettive. Angeli.

Stokman, F. N., & Doreian, P. (2001). Evolution of social networks Part II. Special issue of Journal
of Mathematical Sociology, 23(1).

Suchman, M. C., & Mertz, E. (2010). Toward a new legal empiricism: empirical legal studies and
new legal realism. Annual review of law and social science, 6, 555-579.

Tansley, S., & Tolle, K. M. (2009). The fourth paradigm: data-intensive scientific discovery (Vol. 1).
A. J. Hey (Ed.). Redmond, WA: Microsoft research.

Tarissan, F., & Nollez-Goldbach, R. (2014). The network of the international criminal court decisions
as a complex system. In Iscs 2013: Interdisciplinary symposium on complex systems (pp. 255-264).
Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Tarissan, F., & Nollez-Goldbach, R. (2015, December). Temporal properties of legal decision
networks: a case study from the International Criminal Court. In 28th International Conference on
Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX'2015).

Terna, P., Boero, R., Morini, M., & Sonnessa, M. (2005). Simulazione, modelli ad agenti e scienze
sociali.
Thoyer, S., Morardet, S., Rio, P., Simon, L., Goodhue, R., & Rausser, G. (2001). A bargaining model
to simulate negotiations between water users. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation,
4(2), 13-20.

Trobia, A., & Milia, V. (2011). Social Network Analysis. Approcci, tecniche e nuove applicazioni.
Carocci.

Ulen, T. S. (2002). A Nobel Prize in legal science: theory, empirical Work, and the scientific method
in the study of law. U. Ill. L. Rev., 875.

Waldrop, M. M. (1993). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. Simon
and Schuster.

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 8).
Cambridge university press.

Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’networks. nature,

393(6684), 440.

Whalen, R. (2016). Legal networks: The promises and challenges of legal network analysis. Mich. St.
L. Rev., 539.

Winkels, R., Ruyter, J., & Kroese, H. (2011). Determining authority of dutch case law. Legal
Knowledge and Information Systems, 235, 103-112.

Xu, J. J., & Chen, H. (2005b). CrimeNet explorer: a framework for criminal network knowledge
discovery. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 23(2), 201-226.

Xu, J., & Chen, H. (2005a). Criminal network analysis and visualization. Communications of the
ACM, 48(6), 100-107.

Zwillinger, D., & Kokoska, S. (1999). CRC standard probability and statistics tables and formulae.
Crc Press.

Sitografia

https://books.google.it/books?hl=it&lr=&id=IKoAAAAAcAAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=novum+org
anum&ots=GZ5YLBRqIi&sig=9ujyISZNwuuIgkY8CHJQrTftl2M#v=onepage&q=novum%20orga
num&f=false (28.02.2019)
https://oa.inapp.org/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/77/INAPP_SINAPPSI_Lettieri_2017.pdf?s
equence=1&isAllowed=y (10.03.2019)

https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/austin-jl/ (12.03.2019)

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/509/579/case.pdf (11.03.2019)

https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/5047/law-as-a-natural-phenomenon-the-empirical-
investigation-of-the-legal-universe-between-complexity-bio#overview (10.03.2019)

https://books.google.it/books?id=8t04DgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=it&source=gbs_atb#v
=onepage&q&f=false (24.05.2019)

http://home.deib.polimi.it/loiacono/uploads/Teaching/ASD/ASD%2010%20Grafi.pdf (08.06.2019)

https://www.academia.edu/849370/Dispense_di_Grafi_e_Reti_di_Flusso (12.06.2019)

https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41598-017-01876-
0/MediaObjects/41598_2017_1876_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (12.06.2019)

http://newlegalrealism.org/1990/01/04/what-is-new-legal-realism/ (02.06.2019)

https://openaccess.sdum.uminho.pt/wpcontent/uploads/2013/02/1_GeoffreyBoulton_OpenAIREwor
kshopUMinho.pdf (08.03.2019)

http://www.scienzaefilosofia.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/res569821_06-lettieri.pdf
(02.06.2019)

http://www.scienzaefilosofia.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/res569821_06-lettieri.pdf
(02.06.2019)

http://epdb.eu/eulegislation (10.03.2019)

http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/11/4/12.html (10.03.2019)

http://lexmex.fr (10.03.2019)

http://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/14559/ (10.03.2019)

https://home.ravellaw.com/ (10.03.2019)

https://www.computationallegalstudies.com/ (10.03.2019)

https://www.insna.org/ (11.04.2019)

http://www.redes-sociales.net/ (11.04.2019)
http://xavier.informatics.indiana.edu/lanet-vi/ (05.06.2019)

http://nodexl.codeplex.com/ (05.06.2019)

http://pajek.imfm.si/doku.php?id=pajek (05.06.2019)

http://www.caida.org/tools/visualization/walrus/ (05.06.2019)

http://www.caida.org/home/ (05.06.2019)

http://opte.org/ (05.06.2019)

http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/ (06.06.2019)

https://gephi.org/gexf/format/ (09.06.2019)

https://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/ (09.06.2019)

https://users.dimi.uniud.it/~paolo.serafini/TGTG.pdf (12.06.2019)