Module Number: 1 Module Heading: The Systems Development Environment

Modern Systems Analysis and Design 1
Module Number: 1
Module Heading: The Systems Development Environment
Introduction:
This module discusses the modern approach to systems analysis and design that
combines the different processes and data views of systems. It also explains the different
types of information systems and the information Systems Development Life Cycle
(SDLC).
Module Objectives:
At the end of the module, the students should be able to:
1. Define information systems analysis and design.

2. Discuss the modem approach to systems analysis and design that combines
the different processes and data views of systems.
3. Describe the organizational roles, including systems analyst, involved in
information systems development.
4. Describe the different types of information systems.
5. Describe the information Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC).
6. List alternatives to the systems development life cycle and compare the
advantages and deficiencies of the SDLC and its alternatives.
Concept Development:
Information systems analysis and design is a complex, challenging, and

stimulating organizational process that a team of business and systems professionals uses
to develop and maintain computer-based information systems. Although advances in
information technology continually give us new capabilities, the analysis and design of
information systems is driven from an organizational perspective. An organization might
consist of a whole enterprise, specific departments, or individual work groups.
Organizations can respond to and anticipate problems and opportunities through
innovative uses of information technology.
Information systems analysis and design is, therefore, an organizational

improvement process. Systems are built and rebuilt for organizational benefits. Benefits
result from adding value during the process of creating, producing, and supporting the
organization’s products and services. Thus, the analysis and design of information
systems is based on your understanding of the organization’s objectives, structure, and
processes as well as your knowledge of how to exploit information technology for
advantage.
Master of Science in Information Technology (MSIT) Saint Paul University

Few business careers present a greater opportunity for significant and visible
impact on business as do careers in systems development. Furthermore, analyzing and
designing information systems will give you the chance to understand organizations at a
depth and breadth that might take many more years to accomplish in other careers.
According to Money magazine, the position of systems analyst will be the best job in
America (Gilbert, 1994). Money predicted that over half a million new systems analyst
jobs would be created between 1994 and 2005, more than doubling the total number of
positions available in 1994. With such promising career prospects, combined with the
challenges and opportunities of dealing with the rapid advances in information
technologies, it is difficult to imagine a more exciting career choice than systems analysis
and design.
An important (but not the only) result of systems analysis and design is
application software; that is, software designed to support a specific organizational
function or process, such as inventory management, payroll, or market analysis. In
addition to application software, the total information system includes the hardware and
systems software on which the application software runs, documentation and training
materials, the specific job roles associated with the overall system, controls, and the
people who use the software along with their work methods. Although we will address all
these various dimensions of the overall system, we will emphasize application software
development—your primary responsibility as a systems analyst.
In the early years of computing, analysis and design was considered to be an art.
Now that the need for systems and software has become so great, people in industry and
academia have developed work methods that make analysis and design a disciplined
process (similar to processes followed in engineering fields). Our goal is to help you
develop the knowledge and skills needed to understand are various methodologies,
techniques, and tools that have been developed, tested, and widely used over the years to
assist people like you during systems analysis and design.
Methodologies are comprehensive, multiple-step approaches to systems

development that will guide your work and influence the quality of your final product:
the information system. A methodology adopted by an organization will be
consistent with its general management style (for example, an organization’s orientation
toward consensus management will influence its choice of systems development
methodology). Most methodologies incorporate several development techniques.
Techniques are particular processes that you, as an analyst, will follow to help
ensure that your work is well thought-out, complete, and comprehensible to others on
your project team. Techniques provide support for a wide range of tasks including
conducting thorough interviews to determine what your system should do, planning and
managing the activities in a systems development project, diagramming the system’s
logic, and designing the reports your system will generate.
Tools are typically computer programs that make it easy to use and benefit from
the techniques and to faithfully follow the guidelines of the overall development

methodology. To be effective, both techniques and tools must be consistent with an

organization’s systems development methodology. Techniques and tools must make it
easy for systems developers to conduct the steps called for in the methodology. These
three elements — methodologies, techniques, and tools — work together to form an
organizational approach to systems analysis and design.
Although many people in organizations are responsible for systems analysis and
design, in most organizations the systems analyst has the primary responsibility. When
you begin your career in systems development, you will most likely begin as a systems
analyst or as a programmer with some systems analyst responsibilities. The primary role
of a systems analyst is to study the problems and needs of an organization in order to
determine how people, methods, and information technology can best be combined to
bring about improvements in the organization. A systems analyst helps system users and
other business managers define their requirements for new or enhanced information
services. As such, a systems analyst is an agent of change and innovation.
In the rest of the module, we will examine the systems approach to studying
organizations and the systems approach to studying analysis and design. You will learn
about the dominant complementary approaches to systems development— the data and
process-oriented approaches. You will also identify the various people who develop
systems and the different types of systems they develop. The module ends with a
discussion of some of the methodologies, techniques, and tools created to support the
systems development process.
A Modern Approach to Systems Analysis and Design
The analysis and design of computer-based information systems began in the

1950s. Since then, the development environment has changed dramatically, driven by
organizational needs as well as by rapid changes in the technological capabilities of
computers. In the 50s, the focus of the development effort was on the processes the
software performed. Since computer power was a critical resource, efficiency of
processing became the main goal. Computers were large, expensive, and not very
reliable. Emphasis was placed on automating existing processes, such as purchasing or
paying, often within single departments. All applications had to be developed in machine
language or assembly language, and they had to be developed from scratch, as there was
no software industry. Because computers were so expensive, computer memory was also
at a premium, so system developers conserved as much memory for data storage as they
could. Conserving memory helped lead to what is called the Year 2000 Problem (or
Y2K), because the years in dates were stored as two digits instead of four. That worked
fine as long as we were in the twentieth century, but doing all of the calculations that
involved dates would cause problems as soon as we crossed into the twenty-first century.
The Year 2000 Problem has become a major source of work in information systems
departments in the late 1990s.

The first procedural or third-generation computer programming languages did not

become available until the beginning of the 1960s. Computers were still large and
expensive. But the 60s saw important breakthroughs in technology that enabled the
development of smaller, faster, less expensive computers — minicomputers — and the
beginnings of the software industry. Most organizations still developed their applications
from scratch, using their in-house.
development staffs. System development was more of an art than a science. This view of
systems development began to change in the 1970s, however, as organizations began to
realize how expensive it was to develop customized information systems for every
application. Systems development came to be more disciplined as many people worked to
make it more like engineering. Early database management systems, using hierarchical
and network models, helped bring discipline to the storage and retrieval of data. The
development of database management systems helped shift the focus of systems
development from processes first to data first.
The 1980s were also marked by major breakthroughs in computing in

organizations, as microcomputers became key organizational tools. The software industry
expanded greatly as more and more people began to write off-the-shelf software for
microcomputers. Developers began to write more and more applications in fourth
generation languages, which unlike procedural languages, instructed a computer on what
to do instead of how to do it. Computer-aided software engineering (CASE) tools were
developed to make systems developers’ work easier and more consistent. As computers
continued to get smaller, faster, and cheaper, and as the operating systems for computers
moved away from line prompt interfaces to windows- and icon-based interfaces,
organizations moved to applications with more graphics. Organizations developed less
software in-house and bought relatively more from software vendors. The systems
developer’s job went through a transition from builder to integrator.
The current systems development environment in the late-1990s continues to be

focused on systems integration. Developers use visual programming environments, like
Power Builder or Visual Basic, to design the user interfaces for systems that run on
client/server platforms.
The database, which may be relational or object-oriented, and which may have
been developed using software from firms such as Oracle, Microsoft, or Ingres, resides
on the server. Alternatively, an organization may have decided to purchase their entire
enterprise-wide system from companies such as SAP AG or PowerSoft Inc. Enterprise-
wide systems are large, complex systems that consist of a series of independent system
modules. Developers assemble systems by choosing and implementing specific modules.
Today, many aspects of the organization’s systems have been developed to interact with
the Internet or with the firm’s intranet.
Although the systems development environment has changed dramatically since

its beginnings in the 1950s, some basic principles that govern the approach to systems
development have been applicable through all the different eras of computing in

organizations. One principle is the distinction between data, data flows, and processing
logic, a distinction that will be considered in the next sections.
Data – Raw facts about people, objects, and events in an organization.
Information – Data that have been processed and presented in a form suitable for
human interpretation, often with the purpose of revealing trends or patterns.
Data Flow – Data in motion, moving from one place in a system to another.
Processing Logic – The steps by which data are transformed or moved and a
description of the events that trigger these steps.
Separating Data and Processes That Handle Data
Every information system consists of three key components that must be clearly
understood by anyone who analyzes and designs systems: data, data flows, and
processing logic.
Data are raw facts that describe people, objects, and events in an organization,
such as a customer’s account number, the number of boxes of cereal bought, and whether
someone is a Democrat or a Republican. Every information system depends on data in
order to produce information, which is processed data presented in a form suitable for
human interpretation. Systems developers must understand what kind of data a system
uses and where the data originate.
Data flows are groups of data that move and flow through a system and include a
description of the sources and destinations for each data flow. For example, a customer’s
account number may be captured when he or she uses a credit card to pay for a purchased
item. The account number may then be stored in a file within the system until needed to
compile a billing statement or prepare a mailing address for a sales circular. When
needed, the account number can be extracted from storage and used to complete a system
function. Figure 1-1 illustrates data flows with directional lines that connect rounded
rectangles which represent the processing steps that accept input data flows and produce
output data flows.
Processing logic, the third component, describes the steps in the transformation of
the data and the events that trigger these steps. For example, processing logic in a credit
card application will explain how to compute available credit given the current credit
balance and the amount of the current transaction. Processing logic will also indicate that
the computation of the new credit balance will occur when a clerk presses a key on a
credit card scanner to confirm the sales transaction. Figure 1-1, using an English-like
language, illustrates the rules for calculating an employee’s pay and the event (receipt of
a new hours-worked value) that causes this calculation to be made.

Figure 1-1 Differences among data, data flow, and processing logic
Traditionally, an information system’s design was based upon what the system
was supposed to do, such as billing and inventory control: the focus was on output and
processing logic. Although the data the system used as input were important, data were
subordinate to the application. The assumption was that we could anticipate all outputs
and the proper processing steps with their need for data. Therefore, we could easily
derive all data requirements from all known system deliverables. Furthermore, each
application contained its own files and data storage capacity. The data had to match the
specifications established in each application, and each application was considered
separately.
This concentration on the flow, use, and transformation of data in an information

system typified the process-oriented approach to systems development. The techniques
and notations developed from this approach track the movement of data from their
sources, through intermediate processing steps, and on to final destinations. Since various
parts of an information system work on different schedules and at different speeds, the
process-oriented approach also shows where data are temporarily stored until needed for
processing. The natural structure of the data is, however, not specified within the
traditional process-oriented approach. Until recently, techniques for the process-oriented
approach did not address the timing or triggering of processing steps, only their sequence.
Data processing managers soon realized that there were problems with analyzing
and designing systems using only a process-oriented approach. One result was the
existence of several specialized files of data, each locked within different applications
and programs. Many of the files in these different applications contained the same data

elements (see Figure 1-2a). When a single data element changed, it had to be changed in
each of these files. If, for example, such a system were in effect at your university and
your address changed, it would have to be changed in the files of the library, the
registrar’s office, the financial aid office, and every other place your address was stored.
It also became difficult to combine specialized data files. Even if the files contained the
same data elements, each file might use a different name and format for the data. Since it
was important to standardize how data elements were represented, data processing
managers gradually came to separate the application programs and the data these
programs used.
This focus on data typified the data-oriented approach to information systems

development. The data-oriented approach depicts the ideal organization of data,
independent of where and how data are used within a system. The techniques used for
data orientation result in a data model that describes the kinds of data needed in systems
and the business relationships among the data. A data model describes the rules and
policies of a business. Some people believe a data model to be more permanent than a
process model since a data model reflects the inherent nature of a business instead of the
way a business operates, which is constantly changing. Some people refer to data-
oriented approaches as information engineering.
Project
Project
Payroll
Payroll Management
Management
System
System Systems
Systems
Personnel
Personnel Personnel
Personnel Projects
Projects
Tax
Tax Data
Data Data
Data Data
Data Data
Data
Figure 1-2a Traditional relationship between data and applications,

with redundant data, versus the database approach.

Payroll System Project Management

System
Personnel
Tax Data Data Projects Data
Figure 1-2b. Database Approach
Table 1.1. Key Differences Between the Process-Oriented and Data-Oriented

Approaches to Systems Development
Characteristics Process-Orientation Data-Orientation
System focus What the system is Data the system needs to
supposed to do and when operate
Design Stability Limited, as business More enduring, as the data
processes and the needs of an organization do
applications that support not change rapidly.
them change constantly.
Data Organization Data files designed for each Data files designed for the
individual application enterprise
State of the data Much uncontrolled Limited, controlled
duplication duplication
Table 1-1 highlights some of the key distinctions between process-oriented and
the data-oriented approaches to systems development. Although we highlight these two
approaches as separate competing orientations, we do so only to emphasize the
differences and unique contributions to systems analysis and design to give you a sense
of the historical evolution of systems analysis and design methodologies. As either
approach is, by itself, inadequate, this module will cover the techniques and tools you
will need to analyze and design both process and data aspects of systems.

Separating Databases and Applications
As data storage management technology advanced, it became possible to

represent data not in separate files for each application but in coherent and shared
databases. A database is a shared collection of logically related data organized in ways
that facilitate capture, storage, and retrieval for multiple users in an organization.
Databases involve methods of data organization that allow data to be centrally managed,
standardized, and consistent. Instead of a proliferation of separate and distinct data files,
the database approach allows central databases to be the sole source of data for many
varied applications.
Under the data-oriented approach to systems development, databases are designed

around subjects, such as customers, suppliers, and parts. Designing databases around
subjects enables you to use and revise databases for many different independent
applications. This focus results in application independence, the separation of data and
the definition of data from applications.
The central point of application independence is that data and applications arc
separate.
For the data-oriented approach to be effective, however, another change in the system
design is needed: Organizations that have centrally managed repositories of
organizational data must design new applications to work with existing databases.
Organizations that do not have centrally managed repositories of organizational data must
design databases that will support both current and future applications.
YOUR ROLE AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES IN

SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
In an organization that develops its own information systems internally, there are
several types of jobs involved. In medium to large organizations, there is usually a
separate Information Systems (IS) department. Depending on how the organization is set
up, the IS department may be a relatively independent unit, reporting to the organization’s
top manager. Alternatively, the IS department may be part of another functional
department1 such as Finance, or there may even be an IS department in several major
business units. In any of these cases, the manager of an IS department will be involved in
systems development. If the department is large enough, there will be a separate division
for systems development, which would be homebase for systems analysts and another
division for programming, where programmers would be based (See Figure 1-3) . The
people for whom the systems are designed are located in the functional departments and
are referred to as users or end users.

Figure 1-3 Organizational Chart for Typical IS Department
Some organizations use a different structure for their IS departments. Following

this model, analysts are assigned and may report to functional departments. In this way,
analysts learn more about the business they support. This approach is supposed to result
in better systems, since the analyst becomes an expert in both systems development and
the business area.
Regardless of how an organization structures its information systems department,

systems development is a team effort. Systems analysts work together in a team, usually
organized on a project basis. Team membership can be expanded to include IS managers,
programmers1 users, and other specialists who may be involved (throughout or at
specific points) in the systems development project. It is rare to find an organizational
information system project that involves only one person. Thus, learning how to work
with others in teams is an important skill for any IS professionals and we will stress team
skills throughout this module.
A good team has certain characteristics, some that are a result of how the group is
assembled and others that must be acquired through effort on the part of team members
(See Table 1-2). A good team is diverse and tolerant of diversity:
Table 1.2. Characteristics of Successful Teams t

 Diversity in background, skills and goals
 Tolerance of diversity, uncertainty, ambiguity
 Clear and complete communication
 Trust
 Mutual Respect and putting one’s own views second to the team
 Reward structure that promotes shared responsibility and accountability

• A diverse team has representation from all the different groups interested in a
system, and the representation of these groups on the team increases the likelihood of
acceptance of the changes a new system will cause.
• Diversity exposes team members to new and different ideas, ideas they might
never think of were all team members from the same background, with the same skills
and goals.
• New and different ideas can help a team generate better solutions to its
problems and defend the course of action it chooses.
• Team members must be able to entertain new ideas without being overly
critical, without dismissing new ideas out of hand simply because they are new.
• Team members must be able to deal with ambiguous information as well

as with complexity and must learn to play a role on a team (and different roles on
different teams) so that the talents of all team members can best be utilized.
In order to work well together, a good team must strive to communicate clearly
and completely with its members. Team members will communicate more effectively if
they trust each other. Trust, in turn, is built on mutual respect and an ability to place one’s
own goals and views secondary to the goals and views of the group. To help ensure that a
team will work well together, management needs to develop a reward structure that
promotes shared responsibility
and accountability within the team. In addition to rewards for individual efforts, team
members must be rewarded by IS managers for their work as members of an effective
work unit.
Team success depends not only on how a team is assembled or the efforts of the
group but also on the management of the team. Reward systems are one part of good
team management. Effective project management is another key element of successful
teams. Project management includes devising a feasible and realistic work plan and
schedule, monitoring progress against this schedule, coordinating the project with its
sponsors, allocating resources to the project, and sometimes even deciding whether and
when a project should be terminated before completing the system.
The characteristics of each systems analysis and design project will dictate which
types of individuals should be on the project team. In general, those involved in systems
development include IS managers, systems analysts, programmers, end users, and
business managers as well as additional IS managers, technicians, and specialists. We will
now preview the role of each of these players and other stakeholders in systems
development.

IS Managers in Systems Development
The manager of an IS department may have a direct role in the systems

development process if the organization is small or if that is the manager’s style.
Typically, IS managers are more involved in allocating resources to and overseeing
approved system development projects rather than in the actual development process.
Thus, IS managers may attend some project review meetings and certainly will expect
written status reports on project progress covering their areas of concern. IS managers
may prescribe what methodologies, techniques, and tools are
to be used and the procedure for reporting the status of projects. As department leaders,
IS managers are also responsible for career planning and development for systems
analysts and other employees and for solving problems that arise in the course of
development projects.
There are, of course, several IS managers in any medium to large IS department

(See Figure 1-3). The manager of an entire IS department may have the title Chief
Information Officer and may report to the president or chairman of the firm. Each
division of the IS department will also have a manager. Typical titles for these managers
are Director of IS Development, IS Operations Manager, and IS Programming Director.
The Director of IS Development may be responsible for several development projects at
any given time, each of which has a project manager. The responsibilities and focus of
any particular IS manager depend on his or her level in the department and on how the
organization manages and supports the systems development process.
Systems Analysts in Systems Development
Systems analysts are the key individuals in the systems development process. To
succeed as a systems analyst, you will need to develop four skills: analytical, technical,
managerial, and interpersonal. Analytical skills enable you to understand the organization
and its functions, to identify opportunities and problems, and to analyze and solve
problems. One of the most important analytical skills you can develop is systems
thinking, or the ability to see organizations and information systems as systems. Systems
thinking provides a framework from which to see the important relationships among
information systems, the organizations they exist in, and the environment in which the
organizations themselves exist. Technical skills help you understand the potential and the
limitations of information technology. As an analyst, you must be able to envision an
information system that will help users solve problems and that will guide the system’s
design and development. You must also be able to work with programming languages,
various operating systems, and computer hardware platforms. Management skills help
you manage projects, resources, risk, and change. Interpersonal skills help you work with
end users as well as with other analysts and programmers. As a systems analyst, you will
play a major role as a liaison among users, programmers, and other systems
professionals. Effective written and oral communication, including competence in leading
meetings, interviewing, and listening, is a key skill analysts must master. Effective

analysts successfully combine these four skills, as Figure 1-4, a typical advertisement for
a systems analyst position, illustrates.
SYSTEMS ANALYST
Distribution Center
We are the world’s leading manufacturer of women’s intimate apparel products.
Our organization in the Far East has an opening for a Systems Analyst.
Requirements:
 Bachelor’s degree (or comparable) in Computer Science and/or Business

Administrations with 5 (+) years of working experience.
 In-depth understanding of Distribution and Manufacturing concepts
(Allocation, Replenishment, Ship Floor Control, Production Scheduling, MRP)
 Working knowledge of project management and all phases of software
development life cycle.
 Experience with CASE tools, PC and Bar Code equipment is essential.
 Working knowledge of an AS/400 and/or UNIX environment with the
languages C, RPG400 and/or COBOL are desirable.
The successful candidate will provide primary interface for all user problems, answer
technical questions and requests within the applications development group; work with
user areas to establish priorities; and provide recommendations and directions for
process improvement through automation; skills in an Asian language is a plus.
We offer an attractive compensation package, relocation assistance and the technical

and analytical challenges you would expect in a state-of-the-art-environment. The
position will report to Senior Management.
Please forward your resume, along with salary requirements to:
Figure 1-4 Typical job ad for a systems analyst
As with any profession, becoming a good systems analyst takes years of study and
experience. Once hired by an organization, you will generally be trained in the
development methodology used by the organization. There is usually a career path for
systems analysts that allows them to gain experience and advance into project
management and further IS or business management. Many academic IS departments
train their undergraduate students to be systems analysts. As your career progresses, you
may get the chance to become a manager inside or outside the IS area. In some
organizations, you can opt to follow a technical career advancement ladder. As an analyst,
you will become aware of a consistent set of professional practices, many of which are
governed by a professional code of ethics, similar to other professions

Programmers in Systems Development
Programmers convert the system specifications given to them by the analysts into
instructions the computer can understand. Writing a computer program is sometimes
called writing code, or coding. Programmers also write program documentation and
programs for testing systems. For many years, programming was considered an art.
However, computer scientists found that code could be improved if it were structured, so
they introduced what is now called structured programming (Bohm and Jacopini, 1966).
In structured programming, all computing instructions can be represented through the use
of three simple structures: sequence, repetition, and selection. Becoming a skilled
programmer takes years of training and experience. Many computer information systems
undergraduates begin work as programmers or programmer/analysts.
Programming is very labor-intensive, therefore, special-purpose computing tools

called code generators have been developed to generate reasonably good code from
specifications, saving an organization time and money. Code generators do not put
programmers out of work; rather, these tools change the nature of programming. Where
code generators are in use, programmers take the generated code and fix problems with it,
optimize it, and integrate it with other parts of the system. The goal of some computer-
aided software engineering (CASE) tools is to provide a variety of code generators that
can automatically produce 90 percent or more of code directly from the system
specifications normally given a programmer. When this goal is achieved, the role of
programmers on systems development teams will be changed further.
End Users in Systems Development
In the typical traditional systems development process, systems analysts

interview, survey, and observe end users to determine what they need from an
information system. End users are business professionals who are experts in their fields
but who usually do not have the skills, time, desire, or responsibility required to develop
information systems. Therefore, as an analyst, you will work with users to convert their
knowledge of the business into supportive information systems. End users often are your
clients or customers, the people for whom you are building a system. In many cases, end
users will also serve on the systems development team, providing their expertise in very
active ways. You and other IS professionals will also provide support and assistance for
those more sophisticated end users who write, test, and implement their own information
or data distribution systems.
Supporting End-User Development
As the number of user requests for new or improved information systems

increases, an IS department will have to assign priorities to development projects.
Prioritization means that some users will get their systems right away while others must
wait. In the 1970s, with the spread of timesharing systems that enabled several people to

use the same computer at the same time, it became technically possible for end users to
develop their own systems. As education and experience made end users aware of these
technologies and they became skillful in using them, many users, impatient for their
requested projects to be scheduled, developed their own applications. Consequently, a
significant role for systems analysts and other IS professionals is to help end users
develop their own systems, which are often stand-alone systems or data distribution
systems designed to enhance an existing system developed by IS professionals.
Support of end-user development has several dimensions. First, IS professionals

must evaluate and make available suitable tools for end users. Second, IS professionals
must train end users in the use of these tools and their proper application. Third, IS
professionals must be
available to assist end users and to answer questions or perform more complicated
systems development work whenever end users have difficulties. Finally, IS professionals
must continue to maintain the data capture and transfer applications that manage the
databases from which end
users extract the data needed in the systems they build.
End-user design and development of information systems has been somewhat

controversial in the past (Alavi and Weiss, 1985; Davis, 1982). Some IS managers have
worried about the quality of the systems end users produce. However, some end users
believe there is no choice, especially if users must wait for the IS department to provide
the desired and needed
systems. Of course, if an organization is too small to have an IS department and outside
consultants are too expensive, end users have little choice but to develop their own
systems or settle for off-the-shelf software.
Business Managers in Systems Development
Another group important to systems development efforts is business managers,

such as functional department heads and corporate executives. These managers are
important to systems development because they have the power to fund development
projects and to allocate the resources necessary for the projects’ success. Because of their
decision-making authority and knowledge of the firm’s lines of business, department
heads and executives arc also able to set general requirements and constraints for
development projects. In larger companies where the relative importance of systems
projects is determined by a steering committee, these executives have additional power as
they are usually members of the steering committees or systems planning groups.
Business managers, therefore, have the power to set the direction for systems
development, to propose and approve projects, and to determine the relative importance
of projects that have already been approved and assigned to other people in the
organization.

Other IS Managers / Technicians in Systems Development
In larger organizations where IS roles are more differentiated, there may be

several additional IS professionals involved in the systems development effort. A firm
with an existing set of databases will most likely have a database administrator who is
usually involved in any systems project affecting the firm’s databases. Network and
telecommunications experts help
develop systems involving data and/or voice communication, either internal or external to
the organization. Some organizations have human factors departments which are
concerned with system interfaces and ease-of-use issues, training users, and writing user
documentation and manuals. Overseeing much of the development effort, especially for
large or sensitive systems, are an organization’s internal auditors who ensure that required
controls are built into the system. In many organizations, auditors also have responsibility
for keeping track of changes in the system’s design. The necessary interaction of all these
individuals makes systems development very much a team effort.
TYPES OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
As you can see, several different people in an organization can be involved in

developing information systems. Given the broad range of people and interests
represented in systems development, you might assume that it could take several different
types of information systems to satisfy all an organization’s information system needs.
Your assumption would be correct.
Up until now we have been talking about information systems in generic terms,
but there are actually several different types or classes of information systems. In general,
these types are distinguished from each other on the basis of what
the system does or by the technology used to construct the system. As a systems analyst,
part of your job will be to determine which kind of system will best address the
organizational problem or opportunity on which you are focusing. In addition, different
classes of systems may require different methodologies, techniques, and tools for
development.
From your prior studies and experiences with information systems, you are
probably aware of at least four classes of information systems:
• Transaction processing systems
• Management information systems
• Decision support systems (for individuals, groups, and executives)
• Expert systems

In addition, many organizations recognize scientific (or technical) computing and

office automation systems. To preview the diversity of systems development approaches,
the following sections briefly highlight how systems analysis and design methods differ
across the four major types of systems.
Transaction Processing Systems
Transaction Processing Systems (TPS) automate the handling of data about

business activities or transactions, which can be thought of as simple, discrete events in
the life of an organization. Data about each transaction are captured, transactions are
verified and accepted or rejected, and validated transactions are stored for later
aggregation. Reports may be produced immediately to provide standard summarizations
of transactions, and transactions may be moved from process to process in order to
handle all aspects of the business activity.
The analysis and design of a TPS means focusing on the firm’s current procedures
for processing transactions, whether those procedures are manual or automated. The
focus on current procedures implies a careful tracking of data capture, flow, processing,
and output. The goal of TPS development is to improve transaction processing by
speeding it up, using fewer people,
improving efficiency and accuracy, integrating it with other organizational information
systems, or providing information not previously available.
Management Information Systems
A management information system (MIS) takes the relatively raw data available
through a TPS and converts them into a meaningful aggregated form that managers need
to conduct their responsibilities. Developing an MIS calls for a good understanding of
what kind of information managers require and how managers use information in their
jobs. Sometimes managers themselves may not know precisely what they need or how
they will use information. Thus, the analyst must also develop a good understanding of
the business and the transaction processing systems that provide data for an MIS.
Management information systems often require data from several transaction
processing systems (for example, customer order processing, raw material purchasing,
and employee timekeeping). Development of an MIS can, therefore, benefit from a data-
orientation, in which data are considered an organization resource separate from the TPS
in which they are captured. Because it is important to be able to draw on data from
various subject areas, developing a comprehensive and accurate model of data is essential
in building an MIS.

Decision Support Systems
Decision support systems (DSS) are designed to help organizational decision

makers make decisions. Instead of providing summaries of data, as with an MIS, a DSS
provides an interactive environment in which decision makers can quickly manipulate
data and models of
business operations. A DSS is composed of a database (which may be extracted from a
TPS or MIS), mathematical or graphical models of business processes, and a user
interface (or dialogue module) that provides a way for the decision maker, usually a non-
technical manager, to communicate with the DSS. A DSS may use both hard historical
data as well as judgments (or “what if” scenarios) about alternative histories or possible
futures. One form of a DSS, an executive information system (EIS), emphasizes the
unstructured capability for senior management to explore data starting at a high level of
aggregation and selectively drilling down into specific areas where more detailed
understandings of the business are required. In either case, a DSS is characterized by less
structured and predictable use; rather, a DSS is a software resource intended to support a
certain scope of decision-making activities (from problem finding to choosing a course of
action).
The systems analysis and design for a DSS often concentrates on the three main
DSS components: database, model base, and user dialogue. As with an MIS, a data
orientation is most often used for understanding user requirements. In addition, the
systems analysis and design project will carefully document the mathematical rules that
define inter-relationships among different data. These relationships are used to predict
future data or to find the best solutions to decision problems. Thus, decision logic must
be carefully understood and documented. Also, since a decision maker typically interacts
with a DSS, the design of easy-to-use yet thorough user dialogues and screens is
important. Because a DSS often deals with situations not encountered every day or
situations that can be handled in many different ways, there can be considerable
uncertainty on what a DSS should actually do. Thus, systems developers often use
methods that prototype the system and iteratively and rapidly redevelop the system based
on trial use.
The development of a DSS, hence, often does not follow as formal a project plan as is
done for a TI’S or MIS, since the software deliverable is more uncertain at the beginning
of the project.
Expert Systems
Different from any of the other classes of systems we have discussed so far, an
expert system (ES) attempts to codify and manipulate knowledge rather than information.
if-then-else rules or other knowledge representation forms describe the way an expert
would approach situations in a specific domain of problems. Typically, users
communicate with an ES through an interactive dialogue. The ES asks questions (that an
expert would ask) and the end user supplies the answers. The answers are then used to
determine which rules apply and the ES provides a recommendation based on the rules.

The focus on developing an ES is acquiring the knowledge of the expert in the

particular problem domain. Knowledge engineers perform knowledge acquisition; they
are similar to systems analysts but are trained to use different techniques, as determining
knowledge is considered more difficult than determining data.
Summary of Information Systems Types
Many information systems you build or maintain will contain aspects of each of
the four major types of information systems. Thus, as a systems analyst, you will likely
employ specific methodologies, techniques, and tools associated with each of the four
information system types. Table 1-3 summarizes the general characteristics and
development methods for each type.
So far, we have concentrated on the context of information systems development,

looking at the different organizations where software is developed, the people involved in
development efforts, and the different types of information systems that exist in
organizations. Now that we have a good idea of context, we can turn to the actual process
by which many information systems are developed in organizations, the systems
development life cycle.
Table 1.3 Systems Development for Different IS Types

IS Type IS Characteristics Systems Development Methods
Transaction Processing High-volume, data capture Process-orientation; concern
System focus; goal is efficiency of with capturing, validating, and
data movement and storing data and with moving
processing and interfacing data between each required step.
different TPSs.
Management Draws on diverse yet Data-orientation; concern with
Information System predictable data resources to understanding relationships
aggregate and summarize between data so data can be
data; may involve accessed and summarized in a
forecasting future data from variety of ways’ builds a model
historical trends and business of data that supports a variety of
knowledge. users.
Decision Support Provides guidance in Data and decision logic-
System identifying problems, finding orientations, design of user
and evaluating alternative dialogue; group communication
solutions, and selecting or may also be key and access to
comparing alternatives; unpredictable data may be
potentially involves groups necessary; nature of systems
of decision makers; often require iterative development
involves semi-structured and utmost constant updating.
problems and the need to
access data at different levels

of detail.
Expert System Provides expert advice by A specialized decision logic-

asking users a sequence of orientation in which knowledge
questions dependent on prior is elicited from experts and
answers that lead to a described by rules or other
conclusion or forms.
recommendation.
DEVELOPING INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND THE SYSTEMS

DEVELOPMENT LIFE CYCLE
Most organizations find it beneficial to use a standard set of steps, called a

systems development methodology, to develop and support their information systems.
Like many processes, the development of information systems often follows a life cycle.
For example, a commercial product follows a life cycle in that it is created, tested, and
introduced to the market. Its sales increase, peak, and decline. Finally, the product is
removed from the market and replaced by something else. The systems development life
cycle (SDLC) is a common methodology for systems development in many
organizations, featuring several phases that mark the progress of the systems analysis and
design effort. Every textbook author and information system development organization
uses a slightly different life cycle model, with anywhere from three to almost twenty
identifiable phases.

Figure 1-5 The Systems Development Life Cycle
Although any life cycle appears at first glance to be a sequentially ordered set of
phases, it actually is not (See Figure 1-5). The specific steps and their sequence are meant
to be adapted as required for a project, consistent with management approaches. For
example, in any given SOLC phase, the project can return to an earlier phase if necessary.
Similarly, if a commercial product does not perform well just after its introduction, it may
be temporarily removed from the market and improved before being re-introduced. In
the systems development life cycle, it is also possible to complete some activities in one
phase in parallel with some activities of another phase. Sometimes the life cycle is
iterative; that is, phases are repeated as required until an acceptable system is found. Such
an iterative approach is especially characteristic of rapid application development
methods, such as prototyping, which we introduce later in the module (See Figure 1-6).
Some people consider the life cycle to be a spiral, in which we constantly cycle through
the phases at different levels of detail (See Figure 1-7).
The life cycle can also be thought of as a circular process in which the end of the
useful life of one system leads to the beginning of another project that will develop a new
version or replace an existing system altogether. However conceived, the systems
development life cycle used in an organization is an orderly set of activities conducted
and planned for each development project. The skills required of a systems analyst apply
to all life cycle models. Software is the most obvious end product of the life cycle; other
essential outputs include documentation about the system and how it was developed as
well as training for users.
Figure 1-6 Rapid Application Development SDLC

Every medium to large corporation and every custom software producer will have
its own specific, detailed life cycle or systems development methodology in place (See
Figure 1-8). Even if a particular methodology does not look like a cycle, you will
probably discover that many of the SDLC steps are performed and SDLC techniques and
tools are used. Learning about systems analysis and design from the life cycle approach
will serve you well no matter which systems development methodology you use.
Figure 1-7 Evolutionary Model SDLC
When you begin your first job, you are likely to spend several weeks or months
learning your organization’s SDLC and its associated methodologies, techniques, arid
tools. The model resembles a staircase with arrows connecting each step to the step
before it and to the step after it. This representation of the SDLC is sometimes referred to
as the waterfall model. We use this SDLC as one example of a methodology but, more
importantly, as a way to arrange the topics of systems analysis and design. Thus, what
you learn in this book you can apply to almost any life cycle you might follow. As we
describe this SDLC throughout the book, you will see that each phase has specific
outcomes and deliverables that feed important information to other phases. At the end of
each phase (and sometimes within phases for intermediate steps), a systems development
project reaches a milestone and, as deliverables are produced, they are often reviewed by
parties outside the project team. In the rest of this section we provide a brief overview of

each SDLC phase. At the end of the section we summarize this discussion in a table
listing the main deliverables or outputs from each SDLC phase.
Figure 1-8 Seer Technologies, Inc. SDLC
The first phase in the SDLC is called project identification and selection. In this
phase, someone identifies the need for a new or enhanced system. In larger organizations,
this recognition may be part of a corporate and systems planning process. Information
needs of the organization as a whole are examined, and projects to meet these needs are
proactively identified. The organization’s information system needs may result from
requests to deal with problems in current procedures, from the desire to perform
additional tasks, or from the realization that information technology could be used to
capitalize on an existing opportunity. These needs can then be prioritized and translated
into a plan for the IS department, including a schedule for developing new major systems.
In smaller organizations (as well as in large ones), determination of which systems to
develop may be affected by ad hoc user requests submitted as the need for new or
enhanced systems arises as well as from a formalized information planning process. In
either case, during project identification and selection, an organization determines
whether or not resources should be devoted to the development or enhancement of each
information system under consideration. The outcome of the project identification and

selection process is a determination of which systems development projects should be

undertaken by the organization, at least in terms of an initial study.
The second phase is project initiation and planning. The two major activities in
this phase are the formal, yet still preliminary, investigation of the system problem or
opportunity at hand and the presentation of reasons why the system should or should not
be developed by the organization. A critical step at this point is determining the scope of
the proposed system. The project leader and initial team of systems analysts also produce
a specific plan for the proposed project which the team will follow using the remaining
SDLC steps. This baseline project plan customizes the standardized SDLC and specifies
the time and resources needed for its execution. The formal definition of a project is
based on the likelihood that the organization’s IS department is able to develop a system
that will solve the problem or exploit the opportunity and determine
whether the costs of developing the system outweigh the benefits it could provide. The
final presentation of the business case for proceeding with the subsequent project phases
is usually made by the project leader and other team members to someone in management
or to a special management committee with the job of deciding which projects the
organization will undertake.
The next phase is analysis. During this phase, the analyst thoroughly studies the
organization’s current procedures and the information systems used to perform
organizational tasks. Analysis has several sub-phases. The first is requirements
determination. in this sub-phase, you and other analysts work with users to determine
what the users want from a proposed system. This sub-phase usually involves a careful
study of any current systems, manual and computerized, that might be replaced or
enhanced as part of this project. Next, you study the requirements and structure them
according to their inter-relationships and eliminate any redundancies. Third, you generate
alternative initial designs to match the requirements. Then you compare these alternatives
to determine which best meets the requirements within the cost, labor, and technical
levels the organization is willing to commit to the development process. The output of the
analysis phase is a description of (but not a detailed design for) the alternative solution
recommended by the analysis team. Once the recommendation is accepted by those with
funding authority, you can begin to make plans to acquire any hardware and system
software necessary to build or operate the system as proposed.
The fourth and fifth phases are devoted to designing the new or enhanced system.
During design, you and the other analysts convert the description of the recommended
alternative solution into logical and then physical system specifications. You must design
all aspects of the
system from input and output screens to reports, databases, and computer processes.
Design occurs in two SDLC phases: logical design and physical design.
Logical design is not tied to any specific hardware and systems software
platform. Theoretically, the system could be implemented on any hardware and systems
software. The idea is to make sure that the system functions as intended. Logical design

concentrates on the business aspects of the system (which is why some life cycles call
this phase business design).
In physical design, you turn the logical design into physical, or technical,
specifications. For example, you must convert diagrams that map the origin, flow, and
processing of data in a system into a structured systems design that can then be broken
down into smaller and smaller units for conversion to instructions written in a
programming language. You design the various parts of the system to perform the
physical operations necessary to facilitate data capture, processing, and information
output. During physical design, the analyst team decides which programming languages
the computer instructions will be written in, which database systems and file structures
will be used for the data, and which hardware platform, operating system, and network
environment the system will run under. These decisions finalize the hardware and
software plans initiated at the end of the analysis phase. Now you can proceed with
acquiring any new technology not already present in the organization. The final product
of the design phase is the physical system specifications in a form ready to be turned over
to programmers and other system builders for construction.
The physical system specifications are turned over to programmers as the first
part of the implementation phase. During implementation, you turn system
specifications into a working system that is tested and then put into use. Implementation
includes coding, testing, and
installation. During coding, programmers write the programs that make up the system.
During testing, programmers and analysts test individual programs and the entire system
in order to find and correct errors. During installation, the new system becomes a part of
the daily activities of the organization. Application software is installed, or loaded, on
existing or new hardware and users are introduced to the new system and trained. Begin
planning for both testing and installation early as the project initiation and planning
phase, since both testing and installation require extensive analysis in order to develop
exactly the right approach.
Implementation activities also include initial user support such as the finalization
of documentation, training programs, and ongoing user assistance. Note that
documentation and training programs are finalized during implementation;
documentation is produced throughout the life cycle, and training (and education) occur
from the inception of a project. Implementation can continue for as long as the system
exists since ongoing user support is also part of implementation. Despite the best efforts
of analysts, managers, and programmers, however, installation is not always a simple
process. Many well-designed systems have failed because the installation process was
faulty. Our point is that even a well-designed system can fail if implementation is not
well managed. Since the management of implementation is usually done by the project
team, we stress implementation issues throughout this book.
The final phase is maintenance. When a system (including its training,

documentation, and support) is operating in an organization, users sometimes find

problems with how it works and often think of better ways to perform its functions. Also,
the organization’s needs with respect to the system change over time. In maintenance,
programmers make the changes that users ask for and modify the system to reflect
changing business conditions. These changes are necessary to keep the system running
and useful. In a sense, maintenance is not a separate phase but a repetition of the other
life cycle phases required to study and implement the needed changes. Thus, you might
think of maintenance as an overlay to the life cycle rather than a separate phase. The
amount of time and effort devoted to maintenance depends a great deal on the
performance of the previous phases of the life cycle. There inevitably comes a time,
however, when an information system is no longer performing as desired, when
maintenance costs become prohibitive, or when an organization’s needs have changed
substantially. Such problems indicate that it is time to begin designing the system’s
replacement, thereby completing the loop and starting the life cycle over again. Often the
distinction between major maintenance and new development is not clear, which is
another reason maintenance often resembles the life cycle itself.
Throughout the systems development life cycle, the systems development project
itself needs to be carefully planned and managed. The larger the systems project, the
greater the need for project management. Several project management techniques have
been developed in this century and many have been made more useful through
automation. Module 2 contains a more detailed treatment of project planning and
management techniques. Next, we will discuss some of the criticisms of the systems
development life cycle and alternatives developed to address those criticisms.
The Traditional SDLC
There are several criticisms of the traditional life cycle approach to systems
development as followed exactly as outlined in Figure 1-5. One criticism relates to the
way the life cycle is organized. Although we know that phases of the life cycle can
sometimes overlap, traditionally one phase ended and another began once a milestone
had been reached. The milestone usually took the form of some deliverable or pre-
specified output from the phase. For example, the design deliverable is the set of detailed
physical design specifications. Once the milestone had been reached and the new phase
initiated, it became difficult to go back. Even though business conditions continued to
change during the development process and analysts were pressured by users and others
to alter the design to match changing conditions, it was necessary for the analysts to
freeze the design at a particular point and go forward. The enormous amount of effort and
time necessary to implement a specific design meant that it would be very expensive to
make changes in a system once it was developed. There were no CASE tools, no code
generators, and no fourth generation languages when the SDLC was popularized in the
1960s. If the design was not frozen, the system would never be completed, as
programmers would no sooner be done with coding one design than they would receive
requests for major changes. The traditional life cycle, then, had the property of locking in
users to requirements that had been previously determined, even though those
requirements might have changed.

Another criticism of the way the traditional life cycle is often used is that it tends
to focus too little time on good analysis and design. The result is a system that does not
match users’ needs and one that requires extensive maintenance, unnecessarily increasing
development costs. According to some estimates, maintenance costs account for as much
as 70 percent of the system development costs (Aktas, 1987). Given these problems,
people working in systems development began to look for better ways to conduct systems
analysis and design.
Table 1-4. Products of SDLC Phases

Phase Products, Outputs or Deliverables
Product Identification Priorities for systems and projects; an architecture for data,
and networks, hardware and IS management is the result of
Selection associated systems planning activities.
Project Initiation and Detailed steps, or work plan, for projects; specification of
Planning system scope and high-level system requirements or features;
assignment of team members and other resources; system
justification or business case.
Analysis Description of current and where problems or opportunities are
with a general recommendation on how to fix, enhance, or
replace current system; explanation of alternative systems and
justification for chosen alternative.
Logical design Functional, detailed specifications of all system elements (data,
processes, inputs, and outputs)
Physical design Technical, detailed specifications of all system elements
(programs, files, network, system software, etc.); acquisition
plan for new technology.
Implementation Code, documentation, training procedures, and support
capabilities.
Maintenance New versions or releases of software with associated updates to
documentation, training, and support.
Structured Analysis and Structured Design
Ed Yourdon and his colleagues developed structured analysis and structured

design in the early 1970s as a way to address some of the problems with the traditional
SDLC (Yourdon & Constantine, 1979). By making analysis and design more disciplined,
similar to engineering fields, through the use of tools such as data flow diagrams and
transform analysis, Yourdon and colleagues sought to emphasize and improve the
analysis and design phases of the life cycle. The goal was to reduce maintenance time and
effort. Structured analysis and design makes it easier to go back to earlier phases in the
life cycle when necessary—for example, when requirements change. Finally, there is also
an emphasis on partitioning or dividing a problem into smaller, more manageable units
and on making a clear distinction between physical and logical design (DeMarco, 1979;

Yourdon & Constantine, 1979). The life cycle used in this module is faithful to these
structured principles.
Object-Oriented Analysis and Design
A more recent approach to systems development that is becoming more and more
popular is object-oriented analysis and design (OOAD) (we elaborate on this approach on
Module 7). OOAD is often called the third approach to systems development, after the
process-oriented and data-oriented approaches. The object-oriented approach combines
data and processes (call methods) into single entities called objects. Objects usually
correspond to the real things an information system deals with, such as customers,
suppliers, contracts, and rental agreements. Putting data and processes together in one
place recognizes the fact that there are a limited number of operations for any given data
structure. Putting data and processes together makes sense even though typical systems
development keeps data and processes independent of each other. The goal of OOAD is
to make system elements more reusable, thus improving system quality and the
productivity of systems analysis and design.
Another key idea behind object-orientation is that of inheritance. Objects are

organized into object classes, which are groups of objects sharing structural and
behavioral characteristics. Inheritance allows the creation of new classes that share some
of the characteristics of existing classes. For example, from a class of objects called
“person,” you can use inheritance to define another class of objects called “customer.”
Objects of the class “customer” would share certain characteristics with objects of the
class “person”: they would both have names, addresses, phone
numbers, and so on. Since “person” is the more general class and “customer” is more
specific, every customer is a person but not every person is a customer.
As you might expect, you need a computer programming language that can create
and manipulate objects and classes of objects in order to create object-oriented
information systems. Several object-oriented programming languages have been created
(e.g., C++, Eiffel, and ObjectPAL—for Paradox for Windows). In fact, object-oriented
languages were developed first and object-oriented analysis and design techniques
followed. Because OOAD is still relatively new, there is little consensus or
standardization among the many OOAD techniques available. In general, the primary
task of object-oriented analysis is identifying objects, defining their structure and
behavior, and defining their relationships. The primary tasks of object-oriented design are
modeling the details of the objects’ behavior and communication with other objects so
that system requirements are met and re-examining and redefining objects to better take
advantage of inheritance and other benefits of object-orientation.

CONSIDERING DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO DEVELOPMENT
In the continuing effort to improve the systems analysis and design process,
several different approaches have been developed. We will describe the more important
alternatives in more detail in later modules. Attempts to make system development less of
an art and more of a science are usually referred to as systems engineering or software
engineering. As the names indicate, rigorous engineering techniques are applied to
systems development. A very influential practice borrowed from engineering is called
prototyping. We will discuss prototyping next, followed by introductions to Joint
Application Design and Participatory Design.
Prototyping
Designing and building a scaled-down but functional version of a desired system

is the process known as prototyping. You can build a prototype with any computer
language or development tool, but special prototyping tools have been developed to
simplify the process. A prototype can be developed with some fourth-generation
languages (4GLs), with the query and screen and report design tools of a database
management system, and with tools called computer-aided software engineering (CASE)
tools.
Using prototyping as a development technique (See Figure 1-9), the analyst works
with users to determine the initial or basic requirements for the system. The analyst then
quickly builds a prototype. When the prototype is completed, the users work with it and
tell the analyst what they like and do not like about it. The analyst uses this feedback to
improve the prototype and takes the new version back to the users. This iterative process
continues until the users are relatively satisfied with what they have seen. Two key
advantages of the prototyping technique are the large extent
to which prototyping involves the user in analysis and design and its ability to capture
requirements in concrete, rather than verbal or abstract, form. In addition to being used
stand-alone, prototyping may also be used to augment the SDLC. For example, a
prototype of the final system may be developed early in analysis to help the analysts
identify what users want. Then the final system is developed based on the specifications
of the prototype.
Prototyping is a form of rapid application development, or RAD. The

fundamental principle of any RAD methodology is to delay producing detailed system
design documents until after user requirements are clear. The prototype serves as the
working description of needs. RAD methodologies emphasize gaining user acceptance of
the human-system interface and developing
core capabilities as quickly as possible, sacrificing computer efficiency for gains in
human efficiency in rapidly building and rebuilding working systems. On the other hand,
RAD methodologies can overlook important software engineering principles, the result of
which are inconsistencies between system modules, noncompliance with standards, and
lack of reusability of system components (Bourne, 1994).

Figure 1-9 The Prototyping Methodology (Adapted from “Prototyping: The New
Paradigm for Systems Development,” by Naumann and Jenkins)
Joint Application Design
In the late 1970s, systems development personnel at IBM developed a new

process for collecting information system requirements and reviewing system designs.
The process is called Joint Application Design (JAD). The basic idea behind JAD is to
bring structure to the requirements determination phase of analysis and to the reviews
that occur as part of design. Users, managers, and systems developers are brought
together for a series of intensive structured meetings run by a JAD session leader who
maintains the structure and adheres to the agenda. By gathering the people directly
affected by an IS in one room at the same time to work together to agree on system
requirements and design details, time and organizational resources are better managed. As
an added plus, group members are more likely to develop a shared understanding of what
the IS is supposed to do. We will discuss JAD in more details in Module 5.

Participatory Design
Developed in Northern Europe, Participatory Design (PD) represents a viable

alternative approach to the SDLC. PD emphasizes the role of the user much more than
traditional North American techniques do. In some instances, PD may involve the entire
user community in the
development process. Each user has an equal voice in determining system requirements
and in approving system design. In other cases, an elected group of users controls the
process. These users represent the larger community, much as a legislature represents the
needs and wants of the electorate. Typically, under PD, systems analysts work for the
users. The organization’s management and outside consultants provide advice rather than
control (Mumford, 1981). PD is partly a result of the roles of labor and management in
the Northern European workplace where labor is more organized, carries more clout, and
is more intimately involved with technological changes than is true in North America.
IMPROVING IS DEVELOPMENT PRODUCTIVITY
Other efforts to improve the system development process have taken advantage of
the benefits offered by computing technology itself. The result has been the creation and
fairly widespread use of computer-aided software engineering or CASE tools. CASE
tools have been developed for internal use and for sale by several leading firms, including
Intersolv (ExceleratorTM), Oracle (Designer/2000), and Sterling Software (COOL:
Stuff), to name only a few.
CASE tools are built around a central repository for system descriptions and
specifications, including information about data names, format, uses, and locations. The
idea of a central repository of information about the project is not new—the manual form
of such a repository is called a project dictionary or workbook. The difference is that
CASE tools automate the repository for easier updating and for consistency. CASE tools
also include diagramming tools for data flow diagrams and other graphical aids, screen
and report design tools, and other special-purpose tools. CASE helps programmers and
analysts do their jobs more efficiently and more effectively by automating routine tasks.
Evaluation:
Answer the questions in the URL

http://cwx.prenhall.com/bookbind/pubbooks/valacich/chapter1/deluxe.html and
http://cwx.prenhall.com/bookbind/pubbooks/valacich/chapter1/deluxe.html (nos. 1 and 2
only) and send to cruz_marilis@eudoramail.com for evaluation and grading.

Module Number: 1 Module Heading: The Systems Development Environment

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Descrizione originale:

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Module Number: 1 Module Heading: The Systems Development Environment

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Modern Systems Analysis and Design 1

Module Heading: The Systems Development Environment

At the end of the module, the students should be able to:

1. Define information systems analysis and design.

Information systems analysis and design is a complex, challenging, and

Information systems analysis and design is, therefore, an organizational

Master of Science in Information Technology (MSIT) Saint Paul University

Methodologies are comprehensive, multiple-step approaches to systems

Master of Science in Information Technology (MSIT) Saint Paul University

methodology. To be effective, both techniques and tools must be consistent with an

A Modern Approach to Systems Analysis and Design

The analysis and design of computer-based information systems began in the

Master of Science in Information Technology (MSIT) Saint Paul University

The first procedural or third-generation computer programming languages did not

The 1980s were also marked by major breakthroughs in computing in

The current systems development environment in the late-1990s continues to be

Although the systems development environment has changed dramatically since

Master of Science in Information Technology (MSIT) Saint Paul University

Data – Raw facts about people, objects, and events in an organization.

Separating Data and Processes That Handle Data

Master of Science in Information Technology (MSIT) Saint Paul University

This concentration on the flow, use, and transformation of data in an information

Master of Science in Information Technology (MSIT) Saint Paul University

This focus on data typified the data-oriented approach to information systems

Figure 1-2a Traditional relationship between data and applications,

Master of Science in Information Technology (MSIT) Saint Paul University

Payroll System Project Management

Figure 1-2b. Database Approach

Table 1.1. Key Differences Between the Process-Oriented and Data-Oriented

Master of Science in Information Technology (MSIT) Saint Paul University

Separating Databases and Applications

As data storage management technology advanced, it became possible to

Under the data-oriented approach to systems development, databases are designed

YOUR ROLE AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES IN

Master of Science in Information Technology (MSIT) Saint Paul University

Figure 1-3 Organizational Chart for Typical IS Department

Some organizations use a different structure for their IS departments. Following

Regardless of how an organization structures its information systems department,

Table 1.2. Characteristics of Successful Teams t

Master of Science in Information Technology (MSIT) Saint Paul University

• Team members must be able to deal with ambiguous information as well

Master of Science in Information Technology (MSIT) Saint Paul University

IS Managers in Systems Development

The manager of an IS department may have a direct role in the systems

There are, of course, several IS managers in any medium to large IS department

Systems Analysts in Systems Development

Master of Science in Information Technology (MSIT) Saint Paul University

 Bachelor’s degree (or comparable) in Computer Science and/or Business

We offer an attractive compensation package, relocation assistance and the technical

Please forward your resume, along with salary requirements to:

Figure 1-4 Typical job ad for a systems analyst

Master of Science in Information Technology (MSIT) Saint Paul University

Programmers in Systems Development

Programming is very labor-intensive, therefore, special-purpose computing tools

End Users in Systems Development

In the typical traditional systems development process, systems analysts

Supporting End-User Development

As the number of user requests for new or improved information systems

Master of Science in Information Technology (MSIT) Saint Paul University

Support of end-user development has several dimensions. First, IS professionals

End-user design and development of information systems has been somewhat

Business Managers in Systems Development