Criteria Excellent (70% and above) Commendable (60-69%) Good (50-59%) Satisfactory (40-49%) Marginal Fail (35-39%) Fail

Satisfactory (40-49%) Marginal Fail (35-39%) Fail (1-34%)

Fails to demonstrate
Provides a clear Attempts to frame and
Introduction to the Some valid and relevant Adequate identification adequate knowledge and Fails to consider any
introduction to the highlight the
organization and current information and identified of organization and understanding about information regarding
organization and current organization and
CSR projects current projects. projects organization and organization and projects
CSR projects. projects.
projects.
Drafting creative and
innovative CSR project
that fits well into the Attempt to Draft
A CSR project which based Adequate attempt to draft Fails to design an
nature of the creative and innovative No attempt to design a
Introduction to the on rational judgements that a CSR project that economically and
organization after CSR project that fits CSR project that has a
proposed CSR project convey the urgency of doing matches the needs of socially viable CSR
considering core values well into the nature of value to stakeholders
the project. stakeholders project
and needs embedded in the organization
the organizational
culture
Adequate attempt to
Applies appropriate apply appropriate Weak application of
Logically and relevantly Very little or no attempt to
theory (ies) from the Appropriate application theories from CSR appropriate theories
Justification and focussed application of CSR use CSR discipline . No
CSR discipline with of theory (ies) from discipline . Limited from CSR discipline .
theoretical analysis discipline but with limited evidence of understanding
some evidence of CSR discipline evidence of Fails to demonstrate
evidence of wider reading. key concepts.
independent reading understanding key detailed understanding.
concepts.
A random collection of
Conclusions derived Conclusions do not statements based on the
Conclusions are valid
from in-depth critical Conclusions are limited and Validity of conclusions is follow from the student’s own point of
Conclusions and clearly derived from
analysis. Largely not entirely convincing. unconvincing. evidence and argument view with little or no
in-depth critical analysis
convincing presented. attempt to draw analysis to
conclusions.