Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Crime Prevention
Michael Branch-Parks
Ashford University
LaShawanda Alexander
February 4, 2017
CRIME 2
Crime Prevention
commit criminal acts do so because they want to maximize their happiness and have the least
amount of pain. When a person commits a crime the punishment should be proportionate to the
crime. According to the Classical School of Criminology video most crimes committed during
the medieval period were punishable by death. Also in that time period torture was used to not
help deter crime but to insure the public that they were safe. Over the course of time we have
developed ways that insures everyone even criminals have rights and are treated fairly even if
The Classical School of Criminology says that discipline is a way to prevent crime. If
an obitual criminal does not want to commit a crime, then that have to be disciplined enough to
not commit the crime. The Classical School of Crime Causation has a few major components
that began in 1974 by a man named Cesare Beccaria. The first component is that everyone can be
a criminal. There are many opportunities for a person to commit a crime and when something
The next component is that crime is rational. People think rationally which involves
an ends or a means calculation. With hat being said people choose to do deviant behavior based
off of their rational decisions. The next component is free will. With rational thinking comes the
option of free will. So a person can choose to commit a crime because they want to and not
The next component is crime. When a person commits a crime they get a sense of
pleasure from it. As a result, from this pleasure a person would commit another crime to get the
same feeling. The last component is punishment. When a crime is committed a punishment that
CRIME 3
is proportion to the crime should follow. During medieval times many punishments for almost
any crime committed was death. Those type of punishments were not proportionate to the crime.
Specific deterrence looks at the offenders individually and the punishment that is
given to them is designed specifically for them so they do not commit another crime. Specific
deterrence punishments are usually harsh punishments aimed at the offender to change their
behavior. One example is someone who has to pay a fine for speeding or someone who receives
a prison sentence. Those types of punishments are made so an individual does not commit the
same crime. General deterrence is a punishment that is not specific to one individual but is aimed
at the public to deter people from committing a crime knowing that the punishment would be
severe.
This type of deterrence would target people who thought about becoming an offender.
One example of this type of deterrence is when a teenager is sent to boot camp as a mandatory
sentence for committing an offense. This is done to make the teens who have thought about
offending fearful of the consequences of committing a crime. Today’s society has a lot different
ways of committing crimes especially with the advancement of technology. Technology gives a
There are many factors that make it hard to deter crime therefore the time it takes to
create a law to fix a crime takes longer. Corruption is a big challenge when it comes to deterring
crime. You can watch your local news station and see that there are people in positions of
authority in our criminal justice system who are corrupt and hinder the change needed to fix
criminal activity because them themselves are committing a crime. Unfortunately, race is
something that influences deterrence but not in a positive way. With the advancement of
CRIME 4
technology, we see people of color being mistreated by law enforcement officials which does
deter crimes from happening but also put a rift between law enforcement and civilian population.
Another challenge to deterrence is politicians. When laws are created they should be
created to be equal and fair to everyone but, if a politician has influence on the laws that are
created and that particular politician does not have the publics best interest at heart then
essentially the laws that are created are working for their favor. Another deterrence is people
who are in different society classes in life. Punishments for crimes committed should be given to
everyone fairly but what happens more often than not is that people who live in a higher class in
society are punished less than people of a lower class. When criminal commit crimes they
commit crimes they believe they can get away with or if the reward is high enough they will risk
A few ways to increase the risk for criminals is to install more cctv cameras and
alarms. The Classical School of Crime Causation says that committing a crime is a rational
choice therefore criminals typically do not commit crimes where their cameras because it has the
potential to leave evidence behind. Installing more alarms has become a lot easier especially with
the type of technology we have in today’s society. When we think of the time of day a criminal
usually commits a crime we think of the middle of the night where there is no light. To increase
the risk installing more lighting could be a way to increase the risk that an offender has to make.
Decreasing the rewards of a crime being committed is a way to deter criminals from
conducting crimes. If a person has a car and has options on where to par their car park in an area
that has security officers. Criminals are all about opportunity so if we do things not to create an
opportunity then they less likely to make us a victim. If a person has to withdraw money from an
ATM machine, then do it in the day instead of in the middle of the night. There is still an
CRIME 5
opportunity for a criminal to rob a person but there is more of a chance they will get caught in
References
https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/criminology/the-classical-school-of-
criminological.php
https://mises.org/library/pitfalls-classical-school-crime-0
http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1128
http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7363
http://schoolworkhelper.net/theories-of-crime-classical-biological-sociological-
interactionist/
Siegel, L. J. (2015). Criminology: The core (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.