Introduction to Philosophy of Human Person the validity of a premise to a
characteristic or belief of the person
Lesson 2: Methods of Philosophizing (Logic and advocating the premise. Fallacies) Appeal to force (Argumentum ad Deductive Reasoning is the process of making a Baculum) an argument where force, logical argument by applying known facts, coercion, or the threat of force is given definitions, properties and the laws of logic. as a justification for a conclusion. False Cause (Post hoc ergo propter hoc) If then statements are typically used in since that event followed this one, the deductive reasoning. event must have been caused by this If something is true something else one. This fallacy is also referred as must be true. coincidental correlation or correlation The “If” part of the statement is the not causation hypothesis. Slippery Slope – once event occurs, The “then” part is the conclusion. other related events will follow, and this will eventually lead to undesirable Inductive Reasoning – is a method of reasoning consequences. in which the premises are viewed as supplying Key questions: some evidence for the truth of conclusion; it is 1. Claimed effects really that bad? based from observations in order to make 2. Claimed effects likely to follow? generalizations. 3. Costs out weigh the benefits? Red Herring Fallacy – Occurs when something is introduced to an argument Fallacy – is a defect in an argument other than that misleads or distracts from the it having false premises. relevant issue. Appeal to Pity (Argumentum ad Misericordiam) a specific kind of appeal to emotion in which someone tries to win support for an argument or idea by exploiting his or her opponent’s feelings of pity or guilty. Appeal to ignorance (Argumentum ad Ignorantium) Whatever has not been proved false must be true, and vice versa. Composition – This infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole. Division – One reasons logically that something true of a thing must also be true of all or some of its part. Against the Person (Argumentum ad Hominem) this fallacy attempts to link