Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Keywords: Cutting tool, Edge preparation, Edge hone, Tool life, Surface
roughness, K-factor.
1. INTRODUCTION difference in the obtained tool life. The heat transfer and
temperature developed were found to depend on form
Tool geometry is found to be a key to developing the factor. It also had an impact on the stress developed at
cutting tools with optimum performance. It is seen that the tool tip causing variations in tool wear and surface
tool macro geometry controls the cutting forces and tool finish [5]. The Sα had significant impact on the
life. Tools are further optimized in design by adopting temperature profile near the edge rather than Sγ and
variety of tool micro-geometries. The micro-geometry hence it has larger influence on tool life and wear rate
refers to the edge preparation which is imparted into the [6]. The higher Sα was found to generate more friction
tools in order to prevent early tool breakages. Edge between the work piece and flank and consequently
preparation can either be chamfered or honed. The increases the wear rate. Hence trumpet edge (K>1)
honed edges produce additional passive forces known as resulted in a better tool life due to lower Sα values when
ploughing forces compared to sharp edges in which the compared to waterfall and symmetric edges [7]. The
ploughing is insignificant [1]. The corner radius in occurrence of ploughing was observed to be higher at
combination with the smaller edge radius improves the larger Sα and hence it resulted in a lower tool life [8]. It
tool life minimizing wear, whereas larger hone radius is evident from the background study that the asym–
increases the forces [2]. The variation in feed has larger metrical edge hone has an impact on tool life and sur–
effect on forces in chamfered edge compared to honed face quality. But it has to be ensured that the extreme
edge. The honed edge produces lesser forces compared care is taken while measuring the edge profile since
to chamfered edges [3].The edge honing was proven to incorrect measuring methods will lead to a false charac–
be necessary to increase the stability of the tool by terization [9,10]. A decrease in form factor with larger
ensuring the edge to be more resistant to wear and contact length along flank face resulted in a increase in
avoiding stress concentration before coating [4]. tool load as well as tool wear [11,12]. The contradictory
The edge preparation can be done in different ways results were obtained by an experimental work carried
and three major types of edge hone profiles can be out by Fulemov et al,[13] 2015 in which lower K-factor
generated. Edge hone profile is judged by an important generated better quality surface and improved tool life.
parameter known as form factor or K-factor. The term This was explained as the insert adopted had wiper
K-factor is geometrically described as follows: geometry and caused a different performance.
The value of K-factor determines whether the edge The use of larger honed edges was found to nega–
radius is more inclined towards rake or flank. K-factor tively affect the finished surface quality. Edge honing is
was found to vary the tool performance and making a done by different technologies like immerse tumbling,
magnet brushing, drag finishing, grinding and abrasive
Received: August 2018, Accepted: January 2019 brushing [14]. The chamfered edges control the rake angles
Correspondence to: Padmakumar M, Lead and edge preparation helps in avoiding stress concen-
Engineer, Kennametal India Limited Technology trations which weakens the edge [15]. Asymmetrical edge
Centre, India with lower Sα eliminated the material side flow and
E-mail: mpadmakumar86@gmail.com improved surface quality [16]. Prediction of forces in
doi: 10.5937/fmet1903437S
© Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Belgrade. All rights reserved FME Transactions (2019) 47, 437-441 437
machining is important in determining power, dimensional
accuracy, form, surface finish and fixtures [17].
Figure 4: (a) Flank (b) Rake (c) Nose of the insert with K=1.6
Insert K factor before K factor after Figure 8: Graph representing tool life for different edges
No Machining machining Table 4: Tool life results for both the edges
1 1.0 0.80
2 1.6 0.90 Insert Type Tool life(Minutes)
(K=1.0) 99
(K=1.6) 95
It is observed that the cutting edge did not retain its
K-factor after machining. Hence SEM image of the
cutting-edge is taken and result is shown in figure 7.
Figure 9: Wear photos of (a) Flank (b) Rake (c) Nose of the
insert with K=1.0
Tool life is compared between the symmetric edge and The edge-honing is effective in improving tool wear
trumpet edge. In general conditions flank is subjected to resistance and the performance of trumpet is evaluated
more abrasion due to friction with the work piece and in terms of tool life and surface roughness with
hence flank wear progression is monitored in this study. symmetric edge in milling of AISI4140 steel. Following
The comparison of wear progression between both the conclusions can be drawn from this research activity:
edges is shown in figure 8. • Trumpet honed edge was found to produce the
Even though trumpet hone was found to wear at a surface with lower and constant Ra values
slower rate compared to symmetric edge, it has failed compared to symmetric edge.
around the same time as symmetric edge. The initial • The higher value of Sα along the flank face in
lower wear observed is due to the lower friction deve– symmetric edge is responsible for the varia-
loped between the flank and work piece as it had lower tions in Ra value.