Sei sulla pagina 1di 9

Trees

DOI 10.1007/s00468-017-1589-4

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Within-crown acclimation of leaf-level physiological


and morphological parameters in young loblolly pine stands
Marco A. Yáñez1 • Thomas R. Fox2 • John R. Seiler2 • Fernando Guerra1 •

Ricardo M. Baettig1 • Francisco Zamudio1 • Javier E. Gyenge3

Received: 10 January 2017 / Accepted: 21 July 2017


Ó Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Abstract position, the magnitude of this effect differed by season.


Key message Light plays a minor role in the within- The fact that crown position affected most of the traits in
crown acclimation of physiological and morphological spring and summer, but not in autumn, suggest that height
parameters in small loblolly pine trees. might be the main driver of foliage acclimation. However,
Abstract Whether the plasticity of foliage within the crown considering that crown position affected SLA in autumn
is driven by light or height is still not well known, espe- but not the photosynthetic rate or N concentration, it is
cially for small trees. The present study was conducted in possible that foliar acclimation of these traits was mainly
two loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) stands growing on two driven by light in this season.
sites, during the third year after planting. The following
traits were investigated in the lower and upper crowns of Keywords Loblolly pine  Gas exchange  Foliage
the same individuals twice per season (spring, summer, and morphology  Foliage acclimation
autumn): photosynthesis (Asat), stomatal conductance (gs),
intrinsic water use efficiency (WUEint), nitrogen concen-
tration ***(N), specific leaf area (SLA), photosynthetic Introduction
nitrogen use efficiency (PNUE), fascicle diameter, and
needles per fascicle. The trees were open-grown at the Accounting for the variability of leaf-level physiological
beginning of the study; thus, any vertical gradient of the parameters within-tree crowns using multi-layered process-
traits was not assumed to be driven by light. Overall, Asat, based models has improved estimates of carbon assimila-
gs, PNUE, and SLA tended to be higher in the lower than in tion at the stand level (De Pury and Farquhar 1997; Ells-
the upper crown, whereas N, fascicle diameter, and needles worth and Reich 1993; Wang et al. 2016). These models
per fascicle were higher in the upper than in the lower account for the within-crown vertical variation (spatial
crown. However, although all traits were affected by crown variation) of certain functional traits and provide infor-
mation on how these traits are related to photosynthetic
capacity. Understanding how crown acclimates at the
Communicated by G. Wieser.
species level and at different stages of stand development is
& Marco A. Yáñez essential for further improvements of these models for use
marcoyanez@utalca.cl in forest plantations (Kenzo et al. 2015). There is a con-
1
tinuous debate about the degree to which height and light
Centro Tecnológico del Álamo (Poplar Technology Center),
Universidad de Talca, 2 Norte 685, P.O. Box 747, Talca,
drive these vertical gradients within the crown (Ambrose
Chile et al. 2009; Cavaleri et al. 2010; Kenzo et al. 2015; Mar-
2 shall and Monserud 2003; Shiraki et al. 2016; Woodruff
Department of Forest Resources and Environmental
Conservation, Virginia Tech, 228 Cheatham Hall (0324), et al. 2004; Zhang et al. 2012b). Most of the studies on this
Blacksburg, VA 2406, USA topic have been conducted using tall trees, in which height
3
AER Tandil, Gral. Rodrı́guez 370, 7000 Tandil, and light gradients are more marked. However, less
Buenos Aires, Argentina understanding exists about how these factors might affect

123
Trees

the physiological and morphological plasticity of small of light was constrained only to a specific level of diffuse
trees. transmittance.
Some studies have addressed the within-crown varia- Height and irradiance are interdependent factors that
tion of traits such as Asat, gs, foliar N partitioning, and affect leaf water potential (Zhang et al. 2012b). Thus, leaf
SLA as influenced by irradiance. Ambient light within the water stress may be the key factor that affects leaf accli-
crown can vary due to self-shading (within the crown) mation (Zhang et al. 2012a). The acclimation of functional
and shading from adjacent trees in the stand (Wyka et al. traits within the crown is dynamic and changes in response
2012). Light is absorbed as it passes through the canopy, to environmental drivers that vary during the year such as
which decreases the photosynthetic capacity in the lower the vapor pressure deficit (VPD), temperature, soil mois-
crown (Lewis et al. 2000). As stands develop and crowns ture content, and light intensity. Consequently, physiolog-
expand, light heterogeneity increases within the crown ical and morphological traits acclimate during the growing
(Chmura and Tjoelker 2008). Typically, the fully exposed season as the leaves elongate. Vertical gradients of leaf
foliage in the upper canopy acclimates to high levels of water potential are expected to be steeper in drier months,
irradiance and has a higher N concentration, more pal- which may induce seasonal acclimation. Similarly, the
isade tissue and mesophyll cells, and a higher number of light intensity and quality varies seasonally affecting the
stomata per unit of leaf area, but lower SLA, light-har- photosynthetic capacity. Although the seasonal variation in
vesting efficiency, and chlorophyll content relative to the gas-exchange parameters has been studied in different
more shaded leaves in the lower crown (Gough et al. Mediterranean species (Broeckx et al. 2014; Limousin
2004; Kazda et al. 2000; Maier et al. 2002; Niinemets et al. 2010; Misson et al. 2010) and pine species (Aspinwall
2007; Niinemets et al. 2015; Palardy 2008; Tang et al. et al. 2011; Tyree et al. 2009), little is known about the
2003; Zhang and Allen 1996). Nitrogen and SLA are key seasonal variation of these parameters when different
functional traits used in process-based models. N in crown layers are compared.
foliage is mostly present in the form of proteins and In small, open-grown trees, hydraulic tension and the
metabolites involved in photosynthesis. Therefore, within light gradient might be insufficient to drive within-crown
the crown, N is preferentially allocated to regions where acclimation, which remains unresolved. This study focuses
carbon assimilation is higher, which generally coincide on loblolly pine, which exhibits considerable phenotypic
with higher irradiance levels (Buckley et al. 2013). This plasticity in response to environmental conditions and
maximizes the return in carbon assimilation per unit cost management practices (Fox et al. 2007). We investigated
of N. Another mechanism that leaves use to acclimate to the seasonal and within-crown variations of gas exchange,
differences in irradiance is the alteration of SLA, which N concentration, PNUE, and morphological parameters of
may have an even greater impact on carbon gain than the foliage in the lower and upper crowns of 3-year-old
re-distribution of N (Evans and Poorter 2001). loblolly pine stands at two sites in the United States. We
Recent studies have shown that height is more strongly hypothesized that in young stands prior to canopy closure,
related to the vertical gradient of functional traits than light i.e., not affected by light gradients in the outer crown, the
(Cavaleri et al. 2010; Ishii et al., 2008; Meinzer et al. 2008; within-crown differences in physiological and morpho-
Shiraki et al. 2016; Woodruff et al. 2004). Therefore, it logical attributes are not driven by light.
might be questionable to use the terms ‘‘sun leaves’’ and
‘‘shade leaves’’ when referring to the upper and lower
foliage, respectively (Oldham et al. 2010). The position of Methods
the foliage within the crown determines the length of the
water column and the magnitude of the resistance to water Study sites, tree selection, and sampling
flow (Marshall and Monserud 2003). The increase in xylem within the crown
water potential in response to gravity is 0.01 MPa m-1
(Woodruff et al. 2004), which alone may explain reduc- Two field trials established in 2009 in the southern United
tions in turgor pressure, water potential, and leaf dry mass States, and were part of a larger project designed to assess
per area (LMA, inverse of SLA) with height (Cavaleri et al. the interactions between loblolly pine genotypes, silvicul-
2010; Meinzer et al. 2008; Zhang et al. 2012a, b). tural intensity, planting density, and site. The two sites
Nonetheless, studying open-grown ponderosa pine (Pinus were included in this study, because they represent con-
ponderosa Laws.), Hubbard et al. (2002) found that height trasting areas where loblolly pine is planted, and the pre-
alone could not explain the vertical gradient in leaf gas vious studies have shown different growth and
exchange or leaf-specific hydraulic conductance. However, physiological responses of the species (Yáñez et al.
Cavaleri et al. (2010) found that height was more strongly 2015, 2017). Details of the study sites, experimental
related to LMA than light in tropical species, and the effect design, and management were presented by Yáñez et al.

123
Trees

(2015). Briefly, one trial was located on the North Carolina


Coastal Plain (NC), at the Bladen Lakes State Forest
(34°490 49.6300 N, 78°350 18.5200 W), while the other trial was
located on the Virginia Piedmont (VA) at the Reynolds
Homestead Forest Resources Research Center
(36°380 35.3200 N, 80°090 18.8400 W). The soil at the VA site
was a well-drained Fairview Series (fine, kaolinitic, mesic
Typic Kanhapludults), whereas the soil at the NC site was a
poorly drained Rains series (fine-loamy, siliceous, semi-
active, thermic Typic Paleaquults). The annual average
temperature and precipitation at VA is 13 °C and
1159.3 mm, respectively. The annual average temperature
and precipitation at NC is 16.9 °C and 1170.7 mm,
respectively (obtained from NOAA online weather data
http://sercc.com/nowdata.html). The present study was
carried out in 2012 (third growing season since planting).
Figure 1 shows the monthly patterns for temperature and
precipitation in 2012.
This study was conducted on a subsample of trees
selected at each site (36 trees per site). The sampled trees
were planted at an initial density of 1235 trees ha-1
(3.66 m between rows and 2.21 m within rows). We
assumed that at this planting density and stage of stand
development (the trees were open-grown), intraspecific
competition for light would be minimal. Thus, the foliage
of both the upper and lower crowns was exposed to similar
irradiance during the day. Therefore, we discarded any
vertical gradient of irradiance at the crown positions sam-
pled. Figure 2 shows a view of the stands during the study.
Fig. 2 View of the sites on the Virginia Piedmont (upper panel) and
North Carolina Coastal Plain (lower panel) in spring during the third
50 250 growing season
Precipitation
Max Temperature NC
40 Average Temperature
Min Temperature 200
Precipitation (mm)

The height of the selected trees ranged from 1.68 to 3.35 m


Temperature (°C)

30
150 at the site in NC and from 2.62 to 4.42 m at the site in VA.
20 The selected trees were free from disease, mechanical
100
10 damage, forking, and dieback.
50
0
Leaf physiological and morphological parameters
-10 0
50 250
VA Leaf-level physiology was repeatedly measured on each
40 selected tree. From March 2012 to November 2012, leaf-
200
Precipitation (mm)
Temperature (°C)

30 level gas exchange was measured every 6–8 weeks (a total


150 of 6 dates per site in the months of March, May, June,
20
August, October, and November). The trees at both sites
100
10 were measured within a 2-week period for each sampling
50 date. The measurements were conducted on branches that
0
were fully exposed to the sun and were randomly selected
-10 0 in the lower and upper third of the crown. A composite
r r t
Jan Feb Ma Ap May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oc Nov Dec sample of three fascicles per crown position was sampled,
and each fascicle was collected from different branches.
Fig. 1 Monthly precipitation and average maximum, minimum, and
mean air temperature for the sites on the North Carolina Coastal Plain For proper selection of sun-exposed fascicles at both crown
(lower panel) and Virginia Piedmont (upper panel) in 2012 positions, the measurements through June were made on

123
Trees

the first flush of 1-year-old foliage; subsequently, the first temporal covariance) and at two positions within the crown
fully expanded flush of current year foliage was measured. (possible within-crown spatial covariance), the variance–
We measured the light-saturated photosynthetic rate (Asat, covariance structures were modeled as doubly repeated
lmol m-2 s-1, at photosynthetically active radiation measurements, using the unstructured matrix for both
(PAR) of 1600 lmol m-2 s-1) and stomatal conductance temporal and spatial covariances. Preliminary analyses
(gs, mmol m-2 s-1) between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. using a using the Akaike (AIC) and Bayesian (BIC) information
portable photosynthesis system (LI-6400, LiCor Inc., Lin- criteria showed that these were the best models to account
coln, NE, USA). The derived intrinsic water use efficiency for the different variance–covariance structures at each
(WUEint) was calculated as Asat/gs. The fascicles collected site. Differences were considered significant at an alpha
from each crown position were placed in the 3 9 2 cm level of 0.05.
chamber immediately after detachment (\30 s). The
chamber air temperature and relative humidity were
maintained at values similar to ambient conditions. For this Results
reason, during the study period, we varied the block tem-
perature in the chamber from 5 to 32 °C at VA and from 9 The statistical approach used in this study enabled us to
to 34 °C at NC. The carbon dioxide concentration was set detect small differences in the physiological and morpho-
to 385 lmol mol-1. Additional measurements of leaf logical traits assessed. Table 1 shows the means per crown
morphology (fascicle diameter and number of needles per position across the growing season and the analysis of
fascicle) were used to calculate leaf area according to the variance results obtained for each physiological and mor-
formula specified by Ginn et al. (1991): leaf area per fas- phological trait per study site. At this stage of stand
cicle = 3.14159(d)(l) ? (n)(d)(l), where d is the fascicle development, and at both sites, all traits except WUEint at
diameter, l is the needle length, and n is the number of VA were affected by crown position either as a main effect
needles per fascicle. In addition, the mean number of or as an effect that differed by season (season by crown
needles per fascicle was calculated for each tree, position, position interaction) (P \ 0.05). Figure 3 shows the sea-
and sampling date. sonal trend of each physiological and morphological trait
Beginning with the May sampling date, the fascicles per site and crown position. As can be observed, when the
collected for physiological assessment were oven dried, interaction term was significant, it was codirectional except
weighed, and ball-milled to a fine powder. Nitrogen con- for WUEint at NC. At both sites, the seasonal patterns for
centration (N) was measured by dry combustion using a Asat and gs were similar. These variables tended to increase
VARIO MAX CN Analyzer (Elementar, Hanau, Germany). in summer (Fig. 3a, b). At NC, Asat and gs were signifi-
Specific leaf area (SLA, cm2 g-1) was determined for the cantly higher in the lower than in the upper crown only in
foliage samples collected in August, October, and spring, whereas these differences persisted until summer at
November, and was calculated as the sum of the leaf area VA. At both sites, the higher gs during the summer months,
for the three fascicle samples divided by the dry weight. more than Asat, decreased WUEint in this season (Fig. 3c).
Subsequently, nitrogen use efficiency (PNUE, At NC, the differences in WUEint between crown positions
lmol mol-1 s-1) was determined as PNUE = (Asat 9 were small and also differed by date (Fig. 3c). At this site,
SLA) 9 28/N, where 28 is the conversion factor of grams WUEint was higher in the lower than in the upper crown in
to mole for N. spring and then shifted in summer and autumn, whereas at
VA, no effect of crown position was detected on WUEint. N
Statistical analysis concentration was higher in the upper than in the lower
crown, and these differences were greater at NC than at
Analysis of variance per site was performed using PROC VA. At both sites, N in the lower crown was maintained at
MIXED in SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, a fairly stable concentration (1.2%) (Fig. 3d). N exhibited a
USA). Individual tree information for both crown positions slight increase from spring to summer followed by a
was averaged by season; therefore, March–May, June– decrease in autumn. At VA, no differences in N between
August, and October–November corresponded to spring, crown positions were detected in autumn. At both sites,
summer, and autumn, respectively. To account for both PNUE was significantly higher in the lower than in the
spatial and seasonal variations of each trait, a model upper crown in both summer and autumn, whereas SLA
including the explanatory variables season, position (lower was significantly higher in the lower than in the upper
and upper crowns), and the interaction among these factors crown only in autumn (Fig. 3e, f). At both sites, the
was applied to each trait. The model did not include ran- number of needles per fascicle and fascicle diameter was
dom factors. Because the measurements were conducted on consistently higher in the upper than in lower crown during
the same individuals in different seasons (possible the growing season (Fig. 3g, h).

123
Trees

Table 1 Upper and lower crown least-square means and P values nitrogen use efficiency (PNUE), specific leaf area (SLA), number of
based on the analysis of variance results for light-saturated photo- needles per fascicle, and fascicle diameter per site (NC North
synthetic rate (Asat), stomatal conductance (gs), intrinsic water use Carolina Coastal Plain, VA Virginia Piedmont)
efficiency (WUEint), nitrogen concentration (N), photosynthetic
Site Crown Asat gs WUEint N PNUE SLA Needles per Fascicle
position fascicle diameter

NC Lower 5.21 (0.08) 114.7 (2.1) 0.048 (0.0006) 1.24 (0.01) 165.4 (3.5) 150.8 (2.1) 3.04 (0.01) 1.23 (0.01)
Upper 5.11 (0.09) 111.9 (2.1) 0.047 (0.0006) 1.46 (0.01) 138.5 (3.5) 141.6 (2.0) 3.39 (0.04) 1.47 (0.01)
VA Lower 5.34 (0.07) 95.2 (2.0) 0.058 (0.0007) 1.29 (0.01) 168.9 (4.0) 151.2 (2.4) 3.04 (0.01) 1.16 (0.01)
Upper 5.02 (0.08) 90.6 (2.3) 0.057 (0.0007) 1.35 (0.01) 143.3 (3.9) 140.1 (2.2) 3.44 (0.04) 1.41 (0.01)
Source of variation
NC Season \0.0001 \0.0001 \0.0001 \0.0001 \0.0001 \0.0001 0.1157 0.0008
Pos. 0.2470 0.1367 0.4626 \0.0001 \0.0001 \0.0001 \0.0001 \0.0001
Season 9 Pos. \0.0001 0.0397 \0.0001 \0.0001 0.5098 0.0210 0.0730 0.0003
VA Season \0.0001 \0.0001 \0.0001 \0.0001 \.3424 0.5450 0.0573 0.0020
Pos. 0.0003 0.0216 0.5664 0.0002 \0.0001 0.0017 \0.0001 \0.0001
Season 9 Pos. 0.0038 0.0020 0.2595 0.0001 0.0259 0.0925 0.4859 0.0061

Values in parentheses are standard errors


The effects are season and crown position (Pos.)

Discussion For instance, more N is allocated to leaves grown under


high light where carbon assimilation is higher (Buckley
Tree canopies permanently acclimate to changing temporal et al. 2013). SLA is also related to irradiance as it describes
and spatial conditions, which influences physiological the efficiency of light capture by leaves relative to biomass
processes (Sellin and Kupper 2004). In this study, the construction (Marshall and Monserud 2003). In our study,
seasonal variation in physiological and morphological the within-crown differences in the physiological and
parameters at two crown positions in young loblolly pine morphological traits are likely not attributable to light
stands located at two contrasting sites was examined under gradients as the main cause due to the following reasons:
the assumptions that these trees were open-grown and there (1) tree height ranged from 1.6 to 4.4 m at the beginning of
was no intense intraspecific competition for light. Under the growing season (spring), and the trees were open-
these conditions, we hypothesized that within-crown dif- grown, (2) according to the within-tree sampling strategy,
ferences in physiological and morphological attributes only foliage that was fully exposed to the sun was selected
during the early stages of stand development are not driven from each crown position, and (3) for the gas-exchange
by light. Our major findings partially support this hypoth- measurements, PAR was controlled within the chamber. If
esis and also suggest that height might play a more any light gradient affected within-crown acclimation, we
important role in the foliage acclimation of small trees expected this to occur toward the end of the growing sea-
compared with light. son, facilitated by a lower solar angle and shading by taller
There is controversy surrounding the extent to which trees, which was not the case. By contrast, at both sites, the
light intensity or height drives foliage acclimation within gas-exchange parameters were most sensitive to the effect
the crown (Cavaleri et al. 2010; Kenzo et al. 2015; Mar- of crown position in spring. Similarly, traits such as fas-
shall and Monserud 2003; Shiraki et al. 2016; Woodruff cicle diameter and number of needles per fascicle are
et al. 2004; Zhang et al. 2012b). Some studies highlight determined in spring when the foliage develops. Our results
how the acclimation of leaf physiological processes and disagree with the findings of McGarvey et al. (2004), who
morphology within the crown is driven specifically by light conducted a similar study. These authors did not find dif-
(Larbi et al. 2015; Le Roux et al. 2001; Niinemets et al. ferences in photosynthetic rates between canopy layers,
2015). By definition, photosynthesis is the conversion of although their trees were taller than those in the current
light energy into carbon compounds from carbon dioxide study and were planted at a higher planting density. Sim-
and water, and the dependence of this process on irradiance ilarly, Hubbard et al. (2002) did not find differences in leaf
is typically analyzed using A/light curves (Palardy 2008). gas-exchange or leaf-specific hydraulic conductance
Moreover, irradiance induces changes in key traits that between the lower and upper crowns of four open-grown
determine the carboxylation efficiency, such as N and SLA. ponderosa pine (P. ponderosa Laws.) trees. It is possible

123
Trees

(a) (e)

µ
µ

(b) (f)

(c) (g)
µ

(d) (h)

Fig. 3 Least-squares means for loblolly pine saturated photosynthetic (NC North Carolina Coastal Plain, VA Virginia Piedmont), crown
rate (Asat) (a), stomatal conductance (gs) (b), intrinsic water use position (lower and upper crowns), and season (spring, summer, and
efficiency (WUIint) (c), nitrogen concentration (N) (d), photosynthetic autumn). Asterisk denotes significant differences at an alpha level of
nitrogen use efficiency (PNUE) (e), specific leaf area (SLA) (f), 0.05. The sample size was 36 trees per site
number of needles per fascicle (g), and fascicle diameter (h) per site

that the lower number of trees sampled in those studies remobilization should begin first in the upper crown, as
compared to ours might have influenced the statistical most of the foliar N is in the form of proteins involved in
power required to detect small differences as was found in carboxylation, a process that should be down-regulated by
our study. Nevertheless, the results presented by McGarvey lower temperatures and incident light in autumn. Alterna-
et al. (2004) suggest that N and SLA are more sensitive tively, the higher investment of N in the light-harvesting
than the photosynthetic rate to small gradients in complexes in the lower crown might have allowed better
irradiance. acclimation of this crown layer to function under higher
The effect of crown position on N concentration also exposure to diffuse light, which is more typical in autumn
differed by season and site. Overall, the N concentration than in summer. These assertions are supported by the
was higher in the upper crown than in the lower. At both results reported by Tarvainen et al. (2015) for Norway
sites, N in the lower crown was maintained at a fairly spruce. These authors found that the photosynthetic gra-
stable concentration, whereas the trend in the upper crown dient along tree height in the growing season decreased in
followed a seasonal pattern. N in the upper crown increased the autumn and winter months, mainly because of a
slightly from spring to summer and then decreased during decrease in photosynthesis in the upper crown relative to
autumn. At VA, no differences in N between crown posi- the levels measured in the lower crown. In general, the N
tions were detected in autumn. The decrease in N con- concentration of current loblolly pine foliage is high in
centration in the upper crown in this season may be spring and decreases toward autumn, and there is a small
associated with nutrient remobilization. We speculated that increase that coincides with 1-year-old foliage senescence

123
Trees

(Munger et al. 2003; Zhang and Allen 1996). This trend 2004; Shiraki et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2012b). In general,
partially agrees with our results, although the seasonal these types of studies typically involved tall trees and
pattern of foliar N will vary by site (Gough et al. 2004; only one sampling point in time, but does this hypothesis
Munger et al. 2003). At both sites, PNUE was consistently apply to small trees? Zhang et al. (2012a) found differ-
higher in the lower than in the upper crown, despite that at ences in leaf water potential and several morphological
VA, neither Asat nor N was affected by crown position in traits attributed to height in small Robinia pseudoacacia
autumn. In this season, the vertical pattern of PNUE is trees. The fact that crown position affected most of the
likely a direct consequence of vertical variation in SLA. traits in spring and summer, but not in autumn, suggests
These results differ from those reported by Chmura and that height might be the main driver of foliage acclima-
Tjoelker (2008), who observed a gradient of gas-exchange tion. However, considering that crown position affected
and morphological (N and SLA) parameters in young SLA in autumn but not the photosynthetic rate or N
loblolly pine (during the fourth and fifth growing seasons); concentration, it is possible that foliar acclimation of
however, a PNUE gradient was not observed. The differ- these traits was mainly driven by light in this season as
ences among these studies may be attributed to the dif- discussed above. Our study showed that the sampling time
ferent phases of stand development. may produce different results. In view of the results,
In general, a little information exists on the seasonal within-crown acclimation may not be explained by only
variation in loblolly pine SLA. In the present study, the light or height. The effect of both of these factors likely
effect of crown position was detected in autumn. SLA was differs by season as soil moisture, nutrients, and the
140 and 151 cm2 g-1 for the upper and lower crowns, proportion of incident and diffuse light change during the
respectively (9% higher in the lower crown). These values year.
are similar to those reported by Tyree et al. (2009) but are Our results provide insights into the seasonal and
lower than the SLA reported by McGarvey et al. (2004) within-crown variation of leaf-level physiological and
(155–187 cm2 g-1 for the lower and upper crowns, morphological traits of young loblolly pine stands (trees
respectively). In closed canopies, the phenotypic plasticity shorter than 5 m). We found a small but significant effect
of loblolly pine is primary expressed as an increase in SLA of crown position on these traits; however, the magnitude
from the top to the bottom of the canopy (Ellsworth and of this effect differed by season. These results partially
Reich 1993; Gratani 2014). Hence, the fact that SLA was support the hypothesis that within-crown acclimation of
similar at both crown positions in summer provides evi- young trees is not driven by light. In this study, the within-
dence that the light intensity was similar at both crown crown acclimation observed during spring and summer
positions. However, the lower irradiance and zenith in the might be better explained by a greater effect of height than
autumn months could explain the differences and decrease light, whereas the autumn acclimation of some traits might
in SLA in autumn at both crown positions and why the be more strongly attributed to the effect of light.
decrease was greater in the upper crown. This might be
Author contribution statement MY is the main author of the
associated with a higher accumulation of non-structural
manuscript, leaded the research, data analysis, and writing. TF par-
compounds (Poorter et al. 2009) because of a lower growth ticipated in the design of the field test, and helps in the sampling
rate and less demand from other parts of the tree. More- strategy for this specific study. He also contributed in the edition of
over, acclimation of trees to diffuse light may likely induce the whole manuscript. He leads the Forest Productivity Cooperative
and the Center for Advance Forestry System; both organizations
a lower SLA, as has been shown for other plant species (Li
provided funds for the field work. JS helped in the sampling strategy
et al. 2014; Li and Yang 2015). Interestingly, both the for this specific study and did some field work for collecting the data.
fascicle diameter and number of needles per fascicle were He provided the equipment involved in the study. He also contributed
higher in the upper than in the lower crown, which may be in the edition of the whole manuscript. FG contributed in the edition
of the whole manuscript as well as suggesting the approaches for the
associated with higher gas-exchange rates on a per fascicle
statistical analysis. RB contributed in the writing of the whole
basis in the upper than in the lower crown (Ingwers et al. manuscript. FZ contributed in the edition of the whole manuscript as
2016). Some studies indicate that the number of needles well as in the statistical analysis. JG contributed in the edition of the
per fascicle might be an adaptation to environmental whole manuscript.
moisture (Cole et al. 2008; Ingwers et al. 2016), which was
Acknowledgements This research was funded through the NSF
not measured in our study. Center for Advanced Forestry Systems (CAFS) and the Forest Pro-
Some studies support the hypothesis that the vertical ductivity Cooperative (FPC). Funding for this work was also provided
acclimation of physiological and morphological traits is in part by the Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station and the Pro-
driven by height as it constrains vertical water transport, gram McIntire Stennis of the National Institute of Food and Agri-
culture, US Department of Agriculture. We also thank John Peterson
which induces osmotic and turgor pressure adjustments at and Samuel Frye for their help in the field work, Timothy Albaugh for
the leaf level (Cavaleri et al. 2010; Ishii et al. 2008; providing the meteorological data.
Meinzer et al. 2008; Oldham et al. 2010; Woodruff et al.

123
Trees

Compliance with ethical standards angustifolia and Tilia cordata flood plain forest. Tree Physiol
20:1029–1037
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of Kenzo T, Inoue Y, Yoshimura M, Yamashita M, Tanaka-Oda A, Ichie
interest. T (2015) Height-related changes in leaf photosynthetic traits in
diverse Bornean tropical rain forest trees. Oecologia
177:191–202
Larbi A, Vazquez S, El-Jendoubi H, Msallem M, Abadia J, Abadia A,
References Morales F (2015) Canopy light heterogeneity drives leaf
anatomical, eco-physiological, and photosynthetic changes in
Ambrose AR, Sillett SC, Dawson TE (2009) Effects of tree height on olive trees grown in a high-density plantation. Photosynth Res
branch hydraulics, leaf structure and gas exchange in California 123:141–155
redwoods. Plant Cell Environ 32:743–757 Le Roux X, Bariac T, Sinoquet H, Genty B, Piel C, Mariotti A,
Aspinwall MJ, King JS, McKeand SE, Domec JC (2011) Leaf-level Girardin C, Richard P (2001) Spatial distribution of leaf water-
gas-exchange uniformity and photosynthetic capacity among use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination within an
loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) genotypes of contrasting inherent isolated tree crown. Plant Cell Environ 24:1021–1032
genetic variation. Tree Physiol 31:78–91 Lewis JD, McKane RB, Tingey DT, Beedlow PA (2000) Vertical
Broeckx LS, Fichot R, Verlinden MS, Ceulemans R (2014) Seasonal gradients in photosynthetic light response within an old-growth
variations in photosynthesis, intrinsic water-use efficiency and Douglas-fir and western hemlock canopy. Tree Physiol
stable isotope composition of poplar leaves in a short-rotation 20:447–456
plantation. Tree Physiol 34:701–715 Li T, Yang Q (2015) Advantages of diffuse light for horticultural
Buckley TN, Cescatti A, Farquhar GD (2013) What does optimization production and perspectives for further research. Front Plant Sci
theory actually predict about crown profiles of photosynthetic 6:704
capacity when models incorporate greater realism? Plant Cell Li T, Heuvelink E, Dueck TA, Janse J, Gort G, Marcelis LFM (2014)
Environ 36:1547–1563 Enhancement of crop photosynthesis by diffuse light: quantify-
Cavaleri MA, Oberbauer SF, Clark DB, Clark DA, Ryan MG (2010) ing the contributing factors. Ann Bot 114:146–156
Height is more important than light in determining leaf Limousin JM, Misson L, Lavoir AV, Martin NK, Rambal S (2010) Do
morphology in a tropical forest. Ecology 91:1730–1739 photosynthetic limitations of evergreen Quercus ilex leaves
Chmura DJ, Tjoelker MG (2008) Leaf traits in relation to crown change with long-term increased drought severity? Plant Cell
development, light interception and growth of elite families of Environ 33:863–875
loblolly and slash pine. Tree Physiol 28:729–742 Maier CA, Johnsen KH, Butnor J, Kress LW, Anderson PH (2002)
Cole KL, Fisher J, Arundel ST, Cannella J, Swift S (2008) Branch growth and gas exchange in 13-year-old loblolly pine
Geographical and climatic limits of needle types of one- and (Pinus taeda) trees in response to elevated carbon dioxide
two-needled pinyon pines. J Biogeogr 35:257–269 concentration and fertilization. Tree Physiol 22:1093–1106
De Pury DGG, Farquhar GD (1997) Simple scaling of photosynthesis Marshall JD, Monserud RA (2003) Foliage height influences
from leaves to canopies without the errors of big-leaf models. specific leaf area of three conifer species. Can J For Res
Plant Cell Environ 20:537–557 33:164–170
Ellsworth DS, Reich PB (1993) Canopy structure and vertical patterns McGarvey RC, Martin TA, White TL (2004) Integrating within-
of photosynthesis and related leaf traits in a deciduous forest. crown variation in net photosynthesis in loblolly and slash pine
Oecologia 96:169–178 families. Tree Physiol 24:1209–1220
Evans JR, Poorter H (2001) Photosynthetic acclimation of plants to Meinzer FC, Bond BJ, Karanian JA (2008) Biophysical constraints on
growth irradiance: the relative importance of specific leaf area leaf expansion in a tall conifer. Tree Physiol 28:197–206
and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing carbon gain. Plant Cell Misson L, Limousin JM, Rodriguez R, Letts MG (2010) Leaf
Environ 24:755–767 physiological responses to extreme droughts in Mediterranean
Fox TR, Jokela EJ, Allen HL (2007) The development of pine Quercus ilex forest. Plant Cell Environ 33:1898–1910
plantation silviculture in the southern United States. J Forest Munger GT, Will RE, Borders BE (2003) Effects of competition
105:337–347 control and annual nitrogen fertilization on gas exchange of
Ginn SE, Seiler JR, Cazell BH, Kreh RE (1991) Physiological and different-aged Pinus taeda. Can J For Res 33:1076–1083
growth responses of eight-year-old loblolly pine stands to Niinemets U (2007) Photosynthesis and resource distribution through
thinning. For Sci 37:1030–1040 plant canopies. Plant Cell Environ 30:1052–1071
Gough CM, Seiler JR, Johnsen KH, Sampson DA (2004) Seasonal Niinemets U, Keenan TF, Hallik L (2015) A worldwide analysis of
photosynthesis in fertilized and nonfertilized loblolly pine. For within-canopy variations in leaf structural, chemical and phys-
Sci 50:1–9 iological traits across plant functional types. New Phytol
Gratani L (2014) Plant phenotypic plasticity in response to environ- 205:973–993
mental factors. Adv Bot 2014:1–17 Oldham AR, Sillett SC, Tomescu AM, Koch GW (2010) The
Hubbard RM, Bond BJ, Senock RS, Ryan MG (2002) Effects of hydrostatic gradient, not light availability, drives height-related
branch height on leaf gas exchange, branch hydraulic conduc- variation in Sequoia sempervirens (Cupressaceae) leaf anatomy.
tance and branch sap flux in open-grown ponderosa pine. Tree Am J Bot 97:1087–1097
Physiol 22:575–581 Palardy SG (2008) Physiology of woody plants. Academic Press, San
Ingwers MW, Urban J, McGuire MA, Bhuiyan RA, Teskey RO Diego
(2016) Physiological attributes of three- and four-needle fasci- Poorter H, Niinemets Ü, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Villar R (2009) Causes
cles of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Trees 30:1923–1933 and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a
Ishii HT, Jennings GM, Sillett SC, Koch GW (2008) Hydrostatic meta-analysis. New Phytol 182:565–588
constraints on morphological exploitation of light in tall Sequoia Sellin A, Kupper P (2004) Within-crown variation in leaf conduc-
sempervirens trees. Oecologia 156:751–763 tance of Norway spruce: effects of irradiance, vapour pressure
Kazda M, Salzer J, Reiter I (2000) Photosynthetic capacity in relation deficit, leaf water status and plant hydraulic constraints. Ann For
to nitrogen in the canopy of a Quercus robur, Fraxinus Sci 61:419–429

123
Trees

Shiraki A, Azuma W, Kuroda K, Ishii HR (2016) Physiological and properties to intra-canopy light gradients: a common garden test
morphological acclimation to height in cupressoid leaves of with four broadleaf deciduous angiosperm and seven evergreen
100-year-old Chamaecyparis obtusa. Tree Physiol 36:1–10 conifer tree species. Oecologia 170:11–24
Tang Z, Chambers JL, Sword MA, Barnett JP (2003) Seasonal Yáñez MA, Fox TR, Seiler JR (2015) Early growth responses of
photosynthesis and water relations of juvenile loblolly pine loblolly pine varieties and families to silvicultural intensity. For
relative to stand density and canopy position. Trees Struct Funct Ecol Manag 356:204–215
17:424–430 Yáñez MA, Seiler JR, Fox TR (2017) Crown physiological responses
Tarvainen L, Räntfors M, Wallin G (2015) Seasonal and within- of loblolly pine clones and families to silvicultural intensity:
canopy variation in shoot-scale resource-use efficiency trade-offs assessing the effect of crown ideotype. For Ecol Manag
in a Norway spruce stand. Plant Cell Environ 38:2487–2496 398:25–36
Tyree MC, Seiler JR, Maier CA, Johnsen KH (2009) Pinus taeda Zhang S, Allen HL (1996) Foliar nutrient dynamics of 11-year-old
clones and soil nutrient availability: effects of soil organic matter loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) following nitrogen fertilization. Can J
incorporation and fertilization on biomass partitioning and leaf For Res 26:1426–1439
physiology. Tree Physiol 29:1117–1131 Zhang Y, Equiza MA, Zheng Q, Tyree MT (2012a) Factors
Wang X, Zhou H, Han F, Li Y, Hu D (2016) Dynamic spatial patterns controlling plasticity of leaf morphology in Robinia pseudoaca-
of leaf traits affect total respiration on the crown scale. Sci Rep cia L. II: the impact of water stress on leaf morphology of
6:1–12 seedlings grown in a controlled environment chamber. Ann For
Woodruff DR, Bond BJ, Meinzer FC (2004) Does turgor limit growth Sci 69:39–47
in tall trees? Plant Cell Environ 27:229–236 Zhang Y, Zheng Q, Tyree MT (2012b) Factors controlling plasticity
Wyka TP, Oleksyn J, Zytkowiak R, Karolewski P, Jagodzinski AM, of leaf morphology in Robinia pseudoacacia L. I: height-
Reich PB (2012) Responses of leaf structure and photosynthetic associated variation in leaf structure. Ann For Sci 69:29–37

123

Potrebbero piacerti anche