Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
by Eric S. Hadik
“...Let us run with patience the race that is set before us.” Hebrews 12:1
40-Year Cycle:
Stocks in 2018 - 2021 VI
An INSIIDE Track Report
books, watched his interviews and studied his char- 2018 also ushers in a potentially momentous time in
acter as much as possible… to use to her benefit. East vs. West competition. Could late-2018 usher
in an intensification of these battles? IT
Is it possible that Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping
have done the same?
Stock Indices
If so, who is in the most advantageous position
06/29/18 - Stock indexes are fulfilling the third sig-
when this competition is viewed from a longer-term
nificant (multi-month) cycle in 2018. They were
perspective? And who might just be waiting for the
forecast to peak in mid-to-late-Jan. ’18 and then
right opportunity to go ‘all in’? decline into late-March ’18 before rebounding into
mid-to-late-June 2018...
Flashing Warning Signs
The action of 2018 is reinforcing expectations that
In recent weeks, it has been reported that Chinese
this time period - stretching into 2020 or 2021 could
fishing boats - as well as ‘land’-based sources - look a bit like 1978 - 1980/1981 (40-Year Cycle)
have been temporarily blinding US pilots with lasers, during which a combination of competing forces -
over the South China Sea. That region continues to including accelerating inflationary pressures - kept
be one of China’s primary foci, an area through the market in a volatile trading range for a few
which massive amounts of global commerce travel years.
each day. China has the long view.
[That is just a general assessment and is not in-
This laser flashing has also been occurring on the tended to imply comparative months or years… just
coast of East Africa - where China just completed a an overall parallel.]
naval facility in Djibouti, a few miles from an existing The DJIA maintains key support at 23,360 - the
US facility. They continue to compete. level of its early-Feb low and its weekly trend rever-
sal point. That support was tested in late-March
War Cycles in 2021 and again in early-April, but has held each time.
As I have pointed out throughout the 2010’s, long- It would take a weekly close below 23,360/DJIA to
term War Cycles focus on 2021 (at least from the signal a larger-degree correction that could take it
West’s perspective) - the latest phase of an 80-Year down to at least 22,900/DJIA and closer to its 2018
Cycle of War that dates back for centuries. support & primary target for the year - around
22,100/DJIA.
Major wars rarely begin out of nowhere. And rare-
ly without a steady, often extended, escalation of
tensions before reaching a breaking point. And they 8-Month Cycle in DJ Comp Sept. ‘18 Peak
often surround some form of territorial dispute.
China, the US & the South China Sea fit into these Jan ‘18
criteria - with War Cycles continuing to focus on Hadik’s Cycle
2021 for the ultimate ‘flashpoint’. From the looks Progression
and sound of it, dozens of preliminary flash points -
in Africa & the South China Sea - are now occurring.
In most cases, the DJIA is the least diverse and Jun ‘16 Aug. ‘17
least representative of the overall market. With its
composition of only 30 stocks, frequently re- Oct/Nov ‘16 Mar/Apr ‘17
insiidetracktrading.com
aligned to bring in positive stocks and dump nega-
tive ones, it can give a rather skewed perspective.
However, the Nasdaq 100 and S+P 500 have become far less diverse, with close to 80% of the NQ-100’s gains
coming from three stocks in 2018 (AMZN, NFLX & MSFT). The same stocks account for 70+% of the S+P 500’s
gains, according to CNBC and other sources. Add in GOOGL, AAPL & FB and you have almost all of the NQ-
100’s gains.
After moving parabolic in 2018, NFLX has shown some signs of vulnerability after completing back-to-back ~150.0
rallies since Dec. 2017. In the past, I have discussed certain stocks acting as a proxy for the overall market.
NFLX could be the canary in the coal mine...
As for the overall indices, they have rallied since turning their intra-month trends up on July 6, validating the short-
term buy signal generated in the NQU on July 5. The NQU has generated a series of bullish signals while the
DJIA has done the opposite. This tug-of-war could be coming to a resolution as the DJIA nears its decisive June
peak.”
July 2018 - Similar to 2015/2016, specific stocks could be more precisely adhering to overall cycles even as the
indexes mask developing struggles. In this case, NFLX is peaking precisely during the late-June/early-July
monthly cycles and preparing for a sell-off. As described since early-2018, there could be multiple factors - begin-
ning with global indices and then evolving to specific US stocks - that create a ’tail wagging the dog’ syndrome.
That would also adhere to the ’roller coaster’ analogy described many times before. In that parallel, different
stocks and indexes peak sequentially (in a progression, at different times) - much like the separate but connected
cars of an old wooden roller coaster. It is only once the final car passes the summit that the entire train of cars -
or in this illustration, the entire equity complex - is able to decline in tandem… usually reaching an accelerated
plunge in a short amount of time. Weekly, monthly & yearly cycles continue to point to Sept. 2018 as the most
likely time for the final ‘cars’ to reach and pass the summit - setting the stage for a bearish 4Q 2018. IT
Global Indices
16-Month Cycle in DJ Comp
06/28/18 - China’s Shanghai Composite is ful-
filling expectations for further downside but elevat-
Sept. ‘18 Peak
ed this decline. This comes after it peaked in late-
Jan. ‘18 - fulfilling a ~2-year low-low-(high) Cycle
Hadik’s Cycle
Progression & a ~1-year/360-degree low-low-low- Progression
low-(high) Cycle Progression.
May 2018 - set while fulfilling its yearly LHR (in late-
~8-Month Cycle in STOXX 50 (Europe)
2017) and multiple yearly LLR levels. The May ‘18
peak also perpetuated a very precise 54 - 55 week
May 2017 Jan. 2018
high (Apr. ‘15) - high (Apr. ‘16) - high (May ‘17) -
high (May 2018) Cycle Progression. Sept. 2016 Sept. 2018
Information is from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Due to futures’ volatility, recommendations are subject to change
without notice. Readers using this information are solely responsible for their actions and invest at their own risk. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Principles, employees & associates of INSIIDE Track Trading Corporation may have positions in recommended futures or options. The discussion and/or analysis of any
stock, ETF or Index is strictly for educational purposes and is not an offer to buy or sell securities nor a recommendation to do so. Please check all information before
making an investment. No part of this publication may be reproduced or re-transmitted without the editor’s written consent. All Tech Tips ä -- and the term Tech Tips ä
-- are trademarks of INSIIDE Track Trading Corporation and all unauthorized reproduction is strictly prohibited.
Eric S. Hadik -- Editor Copyright 2018 INSIIDE Track Trading Corporation
SUBSCRIPTION RATES:
#1 - Monthly newsletter with periodic Special Reports (no Intra-Month Updates): ____ $179 per yr. (12 issues)
#2 - Monthly newsletter plus Intra-Month Updates: ____ $297 per yr. (12 issues & 12 months)
PO Box 2252 • Naperville IL 60567 • 630-637-0967 • 630-637-0971 (fx) • INSIIDE@aol.com • ww.insiidetrack.com
Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations. No representation is being made that any account will or is
likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. There are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical
performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by a particular trading program. One of the limitations of
hypothetical performance results is they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading
does not involve financial risk and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk in
actual trading. The ability to withstand losses or adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material
points which can adversely affect actual trading results. There are many other factors related to the markets in general or to
the implementation of a specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical
performance results -- all of which can adversely affect actual trading results.