Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
K Veeraiah
Currently MFIs are having global assets worth $50 billion and are not
damaged much by the ongoing crisis of financial capitalism. This proves the
INDIAN CONTEXT
PHENOMENAL GROWTH
As it grows into a profitable business for sure and the MFIs repayment to
banks went up, the banks also reciprocated by lending more than $1 billion to
MFIs in the country. This also paved way for the entry of bigwigs such as SKS,
Reliance, Tata Mutual, apart from longstanding organisations such as Share and
Spandana. All these big players concentrated their operations in Andhra
Pradesh due to its vast SHG client base. Thus the MFIs in Andhra Pradesh in
particular and in in general became corporate entities. With an expansion of 60
per cent per annum it became a lucrative business opportunity attracting so
many big names into the industry. It is appropriate to refer to the Business Line
newspaper which editorially commented on this shift by saying, “Over the last
decade, businessmen whose goals were not the same as those of the original
do-gooders, entered the micro-finance space. They had a firm eye on profit
opportunity and there was a proliferation of micro-finance institutions. Through
clever marketing and image-building, they all donned a halo of virtue that
sought to hide the fact they were, in fact, just large-scale village-type money-
lenders by another name”. As the big names started entering into microfinance
business in the state, the small ones and the ones who started these
operations on non-profit base depending on mobilising internal resources were
crowded out by the big boys. In that way, the operations of microfinance not
only got consolidated in the hands of a few operators, but they are also
witnessing monopolisation of microfinance sector in the state.
There are multiple aspects to the issues that are come up for discussion.
For now we will confine to certain aspects and limited issues. The human rights
violation by MFIs is not a new issue in Andhra Pradesh. A study conducted by
district collector in Krishna district during 2006, the first time when complaints
came up about the morally hazardous methods of recovery staff, concluded
that all MFIs are charging almost 50 per cent interest charges over the loans.
The governments paved way for levying interest rates nearly 400 times than
regular bank interest rates. Even now, for the most commercial loans such as
vehicle loans or housing loans banks are charging nearly 12-14 per cent only
where as MFIs which are supposed to be instrumental in financial inclusion are
charging 50-60 per cent of interest. This whole exercise results in three tier
interest unlike one tier interest as it was in case of banks lending directly to
consumers. Once bank is fixing its rate of interest at 14 per cent, the operation
costs will be added to that which depends upon the size of the MFI and the
profit. In some cases, the debtors failing to face the pressure of MFIs collection
staff lost their mental balance. In some other cases, the women were forced to
pawn their mangalasutrams, and other valuable goods in houses. In certain
cases, invoking the group collaterals, MFI staff forced the rest of the group
members to repay on behalf of their defaulted group member. In all the
occasions, the MFIs are violating the human rights of debtors. All these re-
payments are confined only to weekly interest payments. Amidst so many
attacks, the state government issued an ordinance. In a nutshell, all these
issues revolve around regulating MFIs in levying interest rates. Though NABARD
is supposed to be the nodal agency with a dedicated executive director cadre
person with a department lined up, there is no voice of NABARD in the whole
episode.
Nearly two weeks before the state plunged into this controversy, RBI
issued a directive to the banks asking them to take steps to cap the interest
rates. RBI master guidelines categorically keep the burden of regulating
interest rates on the shoulders of scheduled commercial banks. All the
nationalised banks in unison refused to implement the said directive stating
that it hurts the market sentiments as they are lending capital for profit and
capping interest rate down the line would have a potential risk of non-
recoveries. There is multiplicity of responsibilities among the various
government agencies resulting in leaving the MFIs – large and small –
unregulated. The RBI’s permission is necessary for all MFIs to start lending.
Once they get clearance they can approach financial agencies to raise loans to
lend under the respective structures of MFI. Hence the RBI is holding keys to
regulate them. It can regulate in different ways. First the RBI has to asses the
magnitude of financial exclusion and resources to deal with the state as a unit.
Accordingly, it can allow certain number of MFIs to start operations in that
particular state. Proliferation of MFIs in a particular area is also causing trouble
to the clients, with the competition amongst the MFIs. Once competition enters,
even the service oriented MFIs will be forced to apply market dynamics
resulting in moving away from the objectives. Another source of regulation
could be banks, particularly nationalised banks that are providing loans to MFIs
either as start-up capital or in the form of equity in successful ventures. There
ends the role of banks leaving the money trail aspects untouched. The RBI in a
communique to the government of AP felt that the state governments are
appropriate agencies to regulate MFI operations. The ministry of finance even
after these inhuman incidents, still went on to say, “ We don't intend to
regulate rates. It is not just feasible to control them.” As mentioned above it is
surprising to note that the key nodal agency for financial inclusion, NABARD is
not letting us know its mind. With the multiplicity of responsibilities, MFIs are
left unregulated.
The states under Left Front governments stand out with a stark
difference. The government of Andhra Pradesh is talking about recovery in
the presence of panchayat officials now, where as governments in and Kerala
internalised SHGs model by bringing them under the control of panchayati raj
system. This helped them to channel the credit to the needy families unlike in
Andhra Pradesh where the channeling of credit is market driven as a way out
for expanding consumer credit. A research conducted by Centre for Socio-
Economic and Environmental Studies, confirms this assessment as well as the
experiences of . As long as SHGs, MFIs became integral parts of democratically
elected local bodies, they can be of useful instruments in developing rural
infrastructure such as sanitation and housing. Once they are devoid of such
democratic set up, they will be driven by market based needs whose
consequences are there to see in happening in Andhra Pradesh now.
ROLE MODEL