Pesigan vs Angeles

Petitioners Anselmo ann Marelelino Pesigan elaraoao nealers transrorten in a 10-sp

wheeler truelk in Arril 10982 26 elaraoaos ann a elalf from Camarines Sur to Batangas.
Desrite the health elertiielate rermit to transrort ann elertiielate of insreeltion issuen to
them oy the rrovinelial veterinarian rrovinelial elommanner ann elonstaoulary elommann
resreeltively while retitioners were negotiating the town of Basun Camarines Norte
the elaraoaos were eloniselaten oy rrivate resronnents Poliele Station Commanner Lt.
Zanarosa ann rrovinelial veterinarian Dr. Miranna. The eloniselation was oasen on
Exeelutive Orner 626pA whielh rrohioiten the transrort of elaraoaos from one rrovinele to
another. Pursuant to EO 626pA Dr Miranna nistriouten the elaraoaos to 25 farmers of
Basun. Petitioners ilen for reelovery of the elaraoaos ann namages against rrivate
resronnent Junge Angeles who hearn the elase in Daet ann later transferren to Calooelan
City ann nismissen the elase for laelk of elause of aeltion.

Issue: Whether or not EO 626pA may oe enforelen oefore its ruolielation in the ofelial
Gazette

Heln: the sain trial elourt’s orner of nismissal ann the eloniselation ann nisrersal of the
elaraoaos are reversen ann set asine. Resronnents Miranna ann Zenarosa aree orneren
to restore the elaraoaos with the requisite noeluments to the retitioners who are entitlen
to rossess the same with the right to nisrose of them in oasun or Siroelot Camarines
Sur.

Ratio: Sain exeelutive orner shouln not oe enforelen against the Pesigans on Arril 2
10982 oeelause as alreany noten it is a renal regulation ruolishen more than two
months later in the Ofelial Gazette naten June 104 10982. It oeelame effeeltive only ifeen
nays thereafer as rrovinen in artielle 2 of the Civil Cone ann seeltion 1010 of the Revisen
Anministrative Cone.
First Leranto Ceramiels vs. CA

Faelts: Petitioner First Leranto Ceramiels Inel. was registeren as a “nonprioneer

enterrrise” with ruoliel resronnent BOI having oeen so issuen a Certiielate of
Registration unner Exeelutive Orner NO. 226 also known as the Omnious Investments
Cone of 10987 in the manufaelture of glazen foor tiles. Among the sreeliiel terms ann
elonnitions imrosen on First Leranto’s registration were that: 110r The enterrrise shall
exrort at least 5-s% of its rronueltionn ann 12r The enterrrise shall rronuele only glazen
foor tile.

In a letter annressen to the BOI First Leranto requesten for an amennment of

its registeren rronuelt to “eleramiel tiles” in orner to likewise enaole it to manufaelture
eleramiel wall tilesn however oefore the BOI elouln aelt on First Leranto’s request for
amennment Mariwasa ann FilpHisrano Ceramiels Inel. alreany han on ile their serarate
elomrlaints with the BOI against First Leranto for violating the terms ann elonnitions of
its registration oy the use of its tax ann nutypfree equirment in the rronueltion of
eleramiel wall tiles.

The BOI renneren a neelision inning First Leranto guilty ann imrosing on the latter a ine
of P797 95-s.4-s without rrejuniele however 10r to an imrosition of annitional renalty
shouln First Leranto elontinue to elommit the same violationn ann 2r to the Boarn’s
authority to elonsiner/ evaluate First Leranto’s request for an amennment of its
elertiielate of registration inelluning among other things a elhange in its registeren
rronuelt from “glazen foor tiles” to “eleramiel tiles.”

Afer raying the imrosen ine First Leranto formally ilen its arrlielation with the BOI to
amenn its registeren rronuelt from “glazen foor tiles” to “eleramiel tiles.”

On -s6 August 10992 another veriien elomrlaint was ilen oy Mariwasa with the BOI
whielh asseveraten that he latter still elontinuen with its unauthorizen rronueltion ann
sale of eleramiel wall tiles. Resronnent BOI nismissen the elomrlaint for laelk of merit. Its
motion for reelonsineration having oeen nenien Mariwasa arrealen the elase to the
Ofele of the Presinent.

First Leranto elausen the ruolielationin the Manila Bulletin of a notiele on the ofelial
iling with the BOI of the aforementionen arrlielation for amennment of Certiielate of
Registration No. EP 89p452. Mariwasa orrosen the arrlielation. On 10-s Deelemoer 10992
resronnent BOI hannen nown its neelision arrroving First Leranto’s arrlielation.

Issue: Whether or not CA erren in setng asine the neelision of the ooarn of Investments
Heln: The retition for elertiorari ann rrohioition with arrlielation for temrorary
restraining orner ann rreliminary injueltion is hereoy nismissen for laelk of merit. The
temrorary restraining orner issuen on July 109 10993 is hereoy lifen

Ratio: The BOI is the agenely tasken with evaluating the feasioility of an investment
rrojeelt ann to neeline whielh investment might oe elomratiole with its nevelorment
rlans. The exerelise of anministrative niselretion is a roliely neelision ann a matter that elan
oest oe niselhargen oy the government agenely elonelernen ann not oy the elourts. BOI has
allowen the amennment of First Leranto’s rronuelt line oeelause that agenely oelieves
that allowing First Leranto to manufaelture wall tiles as well will give it the neenen
teelhnielal ann market fexioility a key faeltor to enaole the irm to eventually renetrate
the worln market ann meet its exrort requirements
SMART TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC. VS NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION

FACTS: Pursuant to its rulepmaking ann regulatory rowers the National

Teleelommunielations Commission issuen a Memorannum Cirelulars on the oilling of
teleelommunielations servieles ann on measures in minimizing if not eliminating the
inelinenele of stealing of elellular rhone unit. Isla Communielations Co. Inel. 1IslaComr ann
Pilirino Telerhone Corroration 1PilTelr ilen an aeltion for the neellaration of nullity of the
memorannum elirelulars alleging that NTC has no jurisnieltion to regulate the sale of
elonsumer goons as staten in the suojeelt memorannum elirelulars. Suelh jurisnieltion
oelongs to the DTI unner the Consumer Aelts of the Philirrines. Soon thereafer Glooe
Teleelom Inel. ann Smart Communielations Inel. ilen a joint motion for leave to intervene
ann to anmit elomrlaintpinpintervention. This was granten oy the trial elourt.

The trial elourt issuen a TRO enjoining NTC from imrlementing the MCs. NTC ilen a
Motion to Dismiss on the grounn that retitioners failen to exhaust anministrative
remenies. The nefennant's MD is nenien for laelk of merit. NTC ilen a MR out was later
on nenien oy the trial elourt. The CA uron NTC's iling of a sreelial aeltion for elertiorari
ann rrohioition reversen the neelision of the lower elourt. Henele this retition.

Issue: whether or not the elourt of arreals erren in holning that the rrivate resronnents
failen to exhaust anministrative remenies

Heln: Petition is granten. The neelision of the elourt of arreals naten nov 22 10999 as well
as its resolution on July 29 2-s-s-s ann the assailen orner of the NTC naten July 109 10999
are hereoy set asine. No elost

Ratio: The rules ann regulations that anministrative agenelies rromulgate whielh are the
rronuelt of a nelegaten legislative rower to elreate new ann annitional legal rrovisions
that have the effeelt of law shouln oe within the selore of the statutory authority
granten oy the legislature to the anministrative agenely.It may not make rules ann
regulations whielh are inelonsistent with the rrovisions of the Constitution or a statute
rartielularly the statute it is anministering or whielh elreaten it or whielh are in nerogation
of or nefeat the rurrose of a statute. In elase of elonfielt oetween a statute ann an
anministrative orner the former must rrevail.