CEng 144- Reinforced Concrete Design

1st Sem SY: 2018-2019

Laboratory Exercise Number 3

Computer Programming for One-way Slab Flexure Design

Item No. 1
One-way slab flexure designer

Framing Plan and Loading Inputs:

Clear Span of the Slab along Direction of flexure, l (m)

Uniform live Load (force per unit area), Kpa
Unit Weight of Reonforced Concrete, KN/m^3
PLEASE SELECT:
1. End Span, Discontinuous end integral with Support
Positive Moment 2. End Span, Discontinuous End Unrestrained
3. Interior Spans, All
4. Interior face of Exterior Support, Member built
integrally with supporting spandrel Beam
5. Interior face of Exterior Support, Member built
integrally with supporting column
6. Exterior face of first interior support, Two Spans
Negative Moment
7. Exterior face of first interior support, More than two spans
8. Face of all the other supports, All
9. Face of all supports satisfying (a) Slabs with spans not
exceeding 3m. (b) Beams where ratio of sum of
column stiffness to beam stiffness exceeds 8 at each end span
PLEASE SELECT: 1. Simply supported
2. One-End Continuous
3. Both ends Continuous
4. Cantilever

Trial Design Inputs:

Slab Thickness of Trial Design, h (mm)

Bar Diameter of Trial Design, db (mm)
Regular Horizontal Spacing of Flexural Reinforcement of Trial Design, s (mm)
Concrete Cover (mm)
Concrete Strength of Trial Design, f'c (Mpa)
Steel Yield Strength of Trial Design, fy (Mpa)

Verification of Slab Thickness:

Table 407.3.1.1 (NSCP 2015)

Support Condition Minimum h (mm) Corrected Value Based from fy

Simply supported 185 146.679
One-End Continuous 154.166667 122.232
Both ends Continuous 132.142857 104.77
Cantilever 370 293.357

Verification of Spacing:

From 425.2.1 (NSCP 2015) From 407.7.2.3 (NSCP 2015)

At least the greatest of: Maximum Spacing, s

mm Min s mm
50 mm 50 3h 375
db 12 50 450 mm 450
4/3 dagg N/A

Spacing of Temp Bars

From Sec 424.4

mm
Spacing 452.389 450

From Sec 407.7.6.2

lesser of
5h 625
450 mm 450
 Assumptions:
Use 1-m wide strip for flexure analysis
Assume there is no lateral support by the strips adjacent to the 1-m strip being consid
Assume gravity loads only (DL and LL). Sec 405.3.1
Use Table 406.5.2 for Computing required flexural strength.
Assume that d = h - concrete cover - db/2

uts:

(m) 3.7 Trial Thickness, h complied w

1.9 Trial Spacing, s complied the
23.6 Required Ultimate Moment C
Ultimate Flexural Strength/1-
th Support Design is Adequate?
ned Max allowable Spacing of Tem

built

built SUMMARY:
1
Spans TRIAL h
e than two spans MIN h

with spans not

m of
8 at each end span

125
12
Design, s (mm) 150
20
20.7
275

Analysis and Computation

Live Load, w (KN/m) 1.9

Dead Load, w (KN/m) 2.95
Value Based from fy Minimum h (mm) Required Ultimate Moment Capacity/ 1-m strip (KN*m
l^2
Left Span
122.2321428571
Midspan 13.69
Right Span

Moment (Dead Load) 3.36546

Moment (Live Load) 2.16758
7.2.3 (NSCP 2015)

Spacing, s Ultimate Flexural Strength/1-m strip of Trial Design (K

MAX s
Assumption SY:
375
alpha, mm 11.7843
Beta 0.85
c, mm 13.8639
fs, Mpa 3684.51

THEN:
alpha 11.7843
c 13.8639
fs 3684.51
t to the 1-m strip being considered

Outputs:

Trial Thickness, h complied with Sec. 407.3.1? YES-Complied

Trial Spacing, s complied the pertinent Requirements? YES-Complied
Required Ultimate Moment Capacity/ 1-m strip (KN*m) 7.5066833333
Ultimate Flexural Strength/1-m strip of Trial Design (KN*m) 17.3749101993
Design is Adequate? ADEQUATE
Max allowable Spacing of Temp. Bars, mm 450

SUMMARY:

125 Trial Spacing 150

122.23214 MIN s 50
MAX s 375
ment Capacity/ 1-m strip (KN*m)
Divisor
12
24 12
12

As,mm^753.982236862
d, mm 99

gth/1-m strip of Trial Design (KN*m)

IF SNY:
c1, mm 41.650267
41.650267
c2,mm -71.89879
alpha 35.402727
fs 826.16134

From NSCP 2015. Sec 421 Table 421.2.2

Reduction Factor (phi)
εt 0.0184225 0.9
εty 0.001375
CEng 144- Reinforced Concrete Design
1st Sem SY: 2018-2019

Laboratory Exercise Number 3

Computer Programming for One-way Slab Flexure Design

Item No. 1
One-way slab flexure designer

Framing Plan and Loading Inputs:

Clear Span of the Slab along Direction of flexure, l (m)

Uniform live Load (force per unit area), Kpa
Unit Weight of Reonforced Concrete, KN/m^3
PLEASE SELECT:
1. End Span, Discontinuous end integral with Support
Positive Moment 2. End Span, Discontinuous End Unrestrained
3. Interior Spans, All
4. Interior face of Exterior Support, Member built
integrally with supporting spandrel Beam
5. Interior face of Exterior Support, Member built
integrally with supporting column
6. Exterior face of first interior support, Two Spans
Negative Moment
7. Exterior face of first interior support, More than two spans
8. Face of all the other supports, All
9. Face of all supports satisfying (a) Slabs with spans not
exceeding 3m. (b) Beams where ratio of sum of
column stiffness to beam stiffness exceeds 8 at each end span
PLEASE SELECT: 1. Simply supported
2. One-End Continuous
3. Both ends Continuous
4. Cantilever

Trial Design Inputs:

Slab Thickness of Trial Design, h (mm)

Bar Diameter of Trial Design, db (mm)
Regular Horizontal Spacing of Flexural Reinforcement of Trial Design, s (mm)
Concrete Cover (mm)
Concrete Strength of Trial Design, f'c (Mpa)
Steel Yield Strength of Trial Design, fy (Mpa)

Verification of Slab Thickness:

Table 407.3.1.1 (NSCP 2015)

Support Condition Minimum h (mm) Corrected Value Based from fy

Simply supported 80 63.4286
One-End Continuous 66.6666667 52.8571
Both ends Continuous 57.1428571 45.3061
Cantilever 160 126.857

Verification of Spacing:

From 425.2.1 (NSCP 2015) From 407.7.2.3 (NSCP 2015)

At least the greatest of: Maximum Spacing, s

mm Min s mm
50 mm 50 3h 375
db 12 50 450 mm 450
4/3 dagg N/A

Spacing of Temp Bars

From Sec 424.4

mm
Spacing 452.389 450

From Sec 407.7.6.2

lesser of
5h 625
450 mm 450
 Assumptions:
Use 1-m wide strip for flexure analysis
Assume there is no lateral support by the strips adjacent to the 1-m strip being consid
Assume gravity loads only (DL and LL). Sec 405.3.1
Use Table 406.5.2 for Computing required flexural strength.
Assume that d = h - concrete cover - db/2

uts:

(m) 1.6 Trial Thickness, h complied w

1.9 Trial Spacing, s complied the
23.6 Required Ultimate Moment C
Ultimate Flexural Strength/1-
ith Support Design is Adequate?
ned Max allowable Spacing of Tem

r built

r built SUMMARY:
1
Spans TRIAL h
e than two spans MIN h

with spans not

um of
8 at each end span

125
12
Design, s (mm) 150
20
20.7
275

Analysis and Computation

Live Load, w (KN/m) 1.9

Dead Load, w (KN/m) 2.95
Value Based from fy Minimum h (mm) Required Ultimate Moment Capacity/ 1-m strip (KN*m
l^2
Left Span
52.8571428571
Midspan 2.56
Right Span

Moment (Dead Load) 0.62933

Moment (Live Load) 0.40533
.7.2.3 (NSCP 2015)

Spacing, s Ultimate Flexural Strength/1-m strip of Trial Design (K

MAX s
Assumption SY:
375
alpha, mm 11.7843
Beta 0.85
c, mm 13.8639
fs, Mpa 3684.51

THEN:
alpha 11.7843
c 13.8639
fs 3684.51
nt to the 1-m strip being considered

Outputs:

Trial Thickness, h complied with Sec. 407.3.1? YES-Complied

Trial Spacing, s complied the pertinent Requirements? YES-Complied
Required Ultimate Moment Capacity/ 1-m strip (KN*m) 1.4037333333
Ultimate Flexural Strength/1-m strip of Trial Design (KN*m) 17.3749101993
Design is Adequate? ADEQUATE
Max allowable Spacing of Temp. Bars, mm 450

SUMMARY:

125 Trial Spacing 150

52.857143 MIN s 50
MAX s 375
ment Capacity/ 1-m strip (KN*m)
Divisor
12
24 12
12

As,mm^753.982236862
d, mm 99

gth/1-m strip of Trial Design (KN*m)

IF SNY:
c1, mm 41.650267
41.650267
c2,mm -71.89879
alpha 35.402727
fs 826.16134

From NSCP 2015. Sec 421 Table 421.2.2

Reduction Factor (phi)
εt 0.0184225 0.9
εty 0.001375