President Millard Fillmore signs into law the Organic Act, admitting New Mexico into the Union.

Organized incorporated territories are territories of the United States that are both incorporated (part of
the United States proper) and organized (having an organized government authorized by an Organic
Act passed by the U.S. Congress,
The Territory of New Mexico was an organized incorporated territory of the United States.
A wwa the Oregon Territory etc.
New Mexico Territory was disputed territory during the American Civil War. Settlers in the southern
part of the Territory willingly joined the Confederate States in 1861 as the newly organized
Confederate Territory of Arizona, with a representative delegate to the Confederate Congress in the
capital of Richmond. This territory consisted of the southern half of the earlier Federal New Mexico
Territory of 1851 and was in contrast to the later Federal Arizona Territory established by the Union in
1863, which was the western half split off from the original U.S. New Mexico Territory. Additionally,
more than 8,000 men from New Mexico Territory served in the Union Army .

New Mexico Territory New Mexico - Laws for

the Government of the Territory of New
Mexico; September 22, 1846 Administration.
Sec. 1.
The laws heretofore in force concerning descents, distributions, wills and testaments, as contained in
the treatise on these subjects, written by Pedro Murillo De Larde, shall remain in force so far as they
are in conformity with the constitution of the United States and the state laws in force for the time
being.

Attorney General and Circuit Attorneys

Sec. 1.
There shall be an attorney general appointed by the governor, who shall reside and keep his office at
the seat of government; he shall act as circuit attorney for the circuit in which the seat of government is,
and in said circuit shall perform the duties required by law of circuit attorneys, and receive the same
fees therefor.
Sec. 2.
When required he shall give his opinion in writing to the general assembly, or either house, to the
governor, secretary of the territory, auditor, treasurer and any circuit attorney upon any question of law
relating to their respective duties or offices.
THIS SOUNDS LIKE FUNCTIONS OF A STATE TO ME.or if not state proper is is exercising
GOVENRMENT & AUTHORIZED UNDER & pursuant to the organic original constution.
A state of the United States is one of the 50 constituent entities that shares its sovereignty with the
federal government. Americans are citizens of both the federal republic and of the state in which they
reside, due to the shared sovereignty between each state and the federal government.[1] Kentucky,
Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and Virginia use the term commonwealth rather than state in their full
official names.
States are the primary subdivisions of the United States. They possess all powers not granted to the
federal government, nor prohibited to them by the United States Constitution.

The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1801 incorporated Washington, D.C. and placed it under the
exclusive control of the United States Congress. In congress THERE ARE NO FUNCTIONS OF
ATTORNEYY GENERAL governor, secretary of the territory, auditor, treasurer etc.ITS NOT A
STATTE OF THE UNION.
The U.S. Constitution provided for a federal district under the exclusive jurisdiction of the U.S.
Congress, and the District is therefore not a part of any state. The states of Maryland and Virginia each
donated land to form the federal district .
THIS SOUNDS FOREIGN TO ME!!
The people of the United States ARE subject to common law jurisdiction. This was set forth through
precedent in England with the passage of the Magna Carta. By creating a CORPORATION aka
Districet of Columbia aka D.C. aka FEDERAL ZONE changed system of law in said FEDERAL
ZONE.. Instead of Common Law, Roman Civil Law as well as Admiralty/Maritime Law were the
jurisdiction.These law systems are also known as "Divine Right of Kings", and the "Law of the Seas"

The Supreme Court later noted, in Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor,[7] that parties to
litigation could voluntarily waive their right to an Article III tribunal, and thereby submit themselves to
a binding judgment from an Article I tribunal.
I HAVE DONE NO SUCH THING I HAVE SAID I REMAIN AT ALL TIME IN COMMON LAW
JURSIDCITON.

“The United States is entirely a creature of the Federal Constitution, its power and authority has no
other source and it can only act in accordance with all the limitations imposed by the Constitution.”
Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1, 1 L. Ed. 2nd. 1148 (1957).

IF YOU CLAIM jusidcition PLEASE ENLIGHTEN ME AS TO THIS PROCESS.

If you issue a judgemen I do not believe it ma posses validty or force of law not issued under article
111 PROVISIONS. UPON A MAN.

The CORPORATION OF THE UNITED STATES does not have any legal jurisdiction outside of the
District of Columbia. Within the States of the Republic, the Federal Government of the United States
has absolutely no jurisdiction!

The Supreme Court has stated:

“The laws of Congress in respect to those matters do not extend into the territorial limits of the states,
but have force only in the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the exclusive
jurisdiction of the national government.” Caha v. U.S., 142 U.S., at 215 (1894).
Becraft cites twenty court cases confirming the territorial limitation of federal jurisdiction, including:
 U.S. v. Cotroni, 527 F.2d 708, 711 (2nd Cir., 1975) – holding federal wiretap laws as territorial.
  Reyes v. Secretary of H.E.W., 476 F.2d 910, 915 (D.C. Cir., 1973) – holding administration of
Social Security Act as territorial.
 Schoenbaum v. Firstbrook, 268 F. Supp. 385, 392 (S.D.N.Y., 1967) – holding securities act as
territorial.

Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time.” Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co., 495 F 2nd
906 at 910.
“It is axiomatic that the prosecution must always prove territorial jurisdiction over a
crime in order to sustain a conviction therefor.” U.S. v. Benson, 495 F.2d, at 481 (5th Cir.,
1974).
“The law provides that once State and Federal Jurisdiction has been challenged, it must
be proven.” Main v. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502 (1980).
“Where there is absence of proof of jurisdiction, all administrative and judicial proceedings
are a nullity, and confer no right, offer no protection, and afford no justification, and may be
rejected upon direct collateral attack.” Thompson v Tolmie, 2 Pet. 157, 7 L. Ed. 381; and
Griffith v. Frazier, 8 Cr. 9, 3 L. Ed. 471.

“To do righteousness and justice Is more acceptable to the L ORD

than sacrifice.”[Prov.21:34,Bible,NKJV]“It is a joy for the just to do
justice,But destruction will come to the workers of iniquity. ”
9 U.S. Code § 8.
Proceedings begun by libel in admiralty and
seizure of vessel or property If the basis of
jurisdiction be a cause of action otherwise
justiciable in admiralty, then, notwithstanding
anything herein to the contrary, the party
claiming to be aggrieved may begin his
proceeding hereunder by libel and seizure of
the vessel or other property of the other party
according to the usual course of admiralty
proceedings, and the court shall then have
jurisdiction to direct the parties to proceed
with the arbitration and shall retain
jurisdiction to enter its decree upon the
award.
Blamberg Bros. v. United States, 260 U.S. 452
(1923) Blamberg Brothers v. United States
No. 165
Argued December 5, 1922
Decided January 2, 1923
260 U.S. 452
Syllabus
The second section of the Suits in Admiralty Act does not authorize a suit in personam against the
United States as a substitute for a libel in rem when the United States vessel is not in a port of the
United States or of one of her possessions. P. 260 U. S. 458.[ STATE OF NEW MEXICO IS
INPOSSESION.
272 F. 978 affirmed.
Page 260 U. S. 453
Appeal from a decree of the district court dismissing a libel in admiralty for want of jurisdiction.
made or availing against or affecting a specific person only; imposing a personal liability.

§781. Libel in admiralty against or impleader of United States

A libel in personam in admiralty may be brought against the United States, or a petition impleading the
United States, for damages caused by a public vessel of the United States, and for compensation for
towage and salvage services, including contract salvage, rendered to a public vessel of the United
States: Provided, That the cause of action arose after the 6th day of April, 1920.
(Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 428, §1, 43 Stat. 1112 .)

Short Title
Act Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 428, which enacted this chapter, is popularly known as the "Public Vessels Act".

ARTICLE 5
Drawing and Empaneling Jurors

38-5-1. Qualification of jurors.

1. A person who is at least eighteen years of age, a United States citizen, a resident of New Mexico
residing in the county for which a jury may be convened is eligible and may be summoned for
service as a juror by the courts, unless the person is incapable of rendering jury service because
of:
38-5-2. Exemption from jury service; excusals; service of disqualified juror.
 A person who has served as a member of a petit jury panel or a grand jury in either state or
federal courts within the preceding thirty-six months shall be exempt from sitting or serving as
a juror in a court of this state when the person requests to be exempted from service by reason
of the exemption granted by this subsection.
 A person who is seventy-five years of age or older who files an affidavit requesting an
exemption from jury service with a local court shall be permanently exempt from jury service.
 A person may be excused from jury service at the discretion of the judge or the judge's
designee, with or without the person's personal attendance upon the court, if:
1. jury service would cause undue or extreme physical or financial hardship to the prospective
juror or to a person under the prospective juror's care or supervision;
2. the person has an emergency that renders the person unable to perform jury service; or
3. the person presents other satisfactory evidence to the judge or the judge's designee.
38-5-10. Summoning of jurors; claiming exemption.As used in this section and Section 38-5-1 NMSA
1978, "undue or extreme physical or financial hardship":
1. means circumstances in which a person would:
1. be required to abandon another person under the person's care or supervision due to the
extreme difficulty of obtaining an appropriate substitute caregiver during the period of
jury service;
2. incur costs that would have a substantial adverse impact on the payment of necessary
daily living expenses of the person or the person's dependent; or
3. suffer physical hardship that would result in illness or disease; and

Upon drawing a list of jurors for grand jury or petit jury service, the clerk shall issue a summons for
each juror ordering his attendance at a time and place as fixed by the district judge or magistrate
ordering the drawing. The summons may be served by first class mail or in a manner provided for the
service of civil process. A willful failure to appear as ordered in the summons is a petty misdemeanor.
Accompanying each summons, the clerk of the court shall submit for the information of the jurors the
listing of those classes of persons or qualifications provided by law under which an exemption from
jury service may be claimed. Jurors shall be provided a form upon which they may state the facts
supporting their eligibility to claim exemption from jury service and to express a claim for exemption.
History: 1953 Comp., � 19-1-10, enacted by Laws 1969, ch. 222, � 10; 1991, ch. 71, � 3.